Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Small modular reactors could complement Irelands wind energy system beautifully.

49,586 views • 4 months ago •via X (Twitter)

34 Comments

Dr Paul Dorfman's profile picture
Dr Paul Dorfman4 months ago

SMRs (small modular reactors) are another a costly distraction. They are still in development and decades away from deployment at scale. This means that new nuclear is too late for the climate and energy crises. What’s worse, every pound invested in nuclear is a pound not invested in renewables, energy efficiency, storage and grid resilience - investments that would provide a much bigger pay-off.

Patrick FitzGerald's profile picture
Patrick FitzGerald4 months ago

@ProgressIreland Huge distraction. Deploy what’s proven, cheap and scalable now. Get out of our own bloody way to do so.

Micheal OLainn's profile picture
Micheal OLainn4 months ago

To be built, owned and operated by private enterprise, not price regulated, and a wonderful profit making opportunity for the private promoters and private investors on a long term, 30 years or more ahead, basis.

lemass's profile picture
lemass4 months ago

The people running this state are absolute morons and criminals. Nuclear energy was obvious years ago. Such inferior minds are governing the Irish people.

Sean Griffin's profile picture
Sean Griffin4 months ago

FFG are fooling nobody with the auld look over here shite What about all the builders going out of business lads Nuclear my arse

Kit Murray's profile picture
Kit Murray4 months ago

Who would buy, install, manage and control these hundred or thousands of micro-reactors? Would each contract its own source of uranium or fuel, how would they dispose of N/waste, would there be any planning concerns about placing a few or several in the midst of urban dwelling?

Paddy Hopper's profile picture
Paddy Hopper4 months ago

Hinkley Point C is running 20 billion over budget and the UK government has guaranteed price per MWh at more than double the market rate. Now we are going to give Sean and his ilk to build the equivalent of 40 children hospital 🤔 this is a scam.

Justin McKenna 🇮🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦's profile picture
Justin McKenna 🇮🇪🇪🇺🇺🇦4 months ago

@dohville Not commercially available or proven yet.

KBDolly's profile picture
KBDolly4 months ago

Wrong. They would be base load displacing wind and solar. As in uk

Paddy Hopper's profile picture
Paddy Hopper4 months ago

More tech bro bullshit, it will never happen read up on Hinkley Point C that these types also pushed. Oh and where exactly is it going to be built? This is another scheme to transfer tax payers money to the billionaires class. We need to stop these socialism for the Ritch schemes

John's profile picture
John4 months ago

Yesterday wind generation was just 10% . Badly need clean safe reliable small reactor.

Dr Stuart Woolley's profile picture
Dr Stuart Woolley4 months ago

They could. But building a 1/1.5GW traditional reactor would provide solid base load for generations too, let's not focus solely on SMRs.

Stevie-D's profile picture
Stevie-D4 months ago

Why is it that this comes up now, Mehole says Ireland should look into it, then MSM are all over it, when the dogs in the street know it's never going to happen anyway? Stay sharp. I reckon public attention is being deliberately directed away from something else. .

HowlingJeet's profile picture
HowlingJeet4 months ago

@grok For the capital outlay of a small nuclear reactor, what size of grid scale battery storage could a country get instead? Which of the two would be less of a terrorist target.

Before it's too late's profile picture
Before it's too late4 months ago

I can't see a problem with this....

Badri.nair 🇮🇪's profile picture
Badri.nair 🇮🇪4 months ago

Smr is not a complimentary power supply. It's a standalone 24/7 base load source. But SMR's have not taken off anywhere.

ssilva's profile picture
ssilva4 months ago

If there’s gas offshore, build combined cycle power stations, smr’s wouldn’t be ready in 15y…and in between? A combined cycle pp could be ready in a couple of years and provide, 1000-1200MW easily. What’s the point in importing power if we have a fuel in Irish waters?

Jon's profile picture
Jon4 months ago

It's not a viable option, nor a realistic solution to our climate situation

katrina's profile picture
katrina4 months ago

I'd also like to know when I voted for your 'think-tank' to make decisions on behalf of the electorate?

Brian Flynn's profile picture
Brian Flynn4 months ago

No it wouldn't, it would cause cyclic fatigue to a nuclear plant, like what's happening all plant in the country to facilitate wind. Yes there's advances in the materials that can be used to reduce this fatigue, but it's never zero, & with a nuclear plant there's no compromises.

HowlingJeet's profile picture
HowlingJeet4 months ago

Finish a children’s hospital first and then we can talk.

DublinComments's profile picture
DublinComments4 months ago

Be honest. They don’t exist in the real world outside of Russia and China.

Dario Foe's profile picture
Dario Foe4 months ago

Great to see politicians getting their heads out of the sand about nuclear power.

Ricky Tan 🇮🇪's profile picture
Ricky Tan 🇮🇪4 months ago

Ireland relying purely on wind is risky long term because energy demand is only going to explode with AI, data centres and population growth. Small modular reactors could give Ireland stable baseload energy, lower prices over time and reduce dependence on imported fuel and foreign grids. For me, it's a no brainer

Diarmuid Ó Gaothín's profile picture
Diarmuid Ó Gaothín4 months ago

Due to poor economy of scale, the costs of electricity would be astronomical ( importation of and transport of uranium and plutonium on non existent rail infrastructure) You can build no problem but we don't have expertise to bury its waste deep in mountains. Which mountains ?

katrina's profile picture
katrina4 months ago

1/"However, nuclear projects are often subsidised by governments, lowering financial costs [7]. Major data centre operators are also showing interest in nuclear power [131], but a viable unsubsidised business case remains uncertain. SMR developers claim modular construction.."

Daragh Hurley's profile picture
Daragh Hurley4 months ago

Just one small problem - THEY DON'T EXIST!!

Dodo's profile picture
Dodo4 months ago

It's a no-brainer for Ireland. Unfortunately, our US & EU masters will never allow us to buy affordable but advanced Chinese technology.

Gary_Bills's profile picture
Gary_Bills4 months ago

Read this.

Paul Ó Duḃṫaiġ's profile picture
Paul Ó Duḃṫaiġ4 months ago

How many SME’s are currently in commercial operation outside of test beds in China and Russia?

Mick Finn's profile picture
Mick Finn4 months ago

@IrishinEurVoice I wonder would he support the construction of one in Midleton? I certainly wouldn’t

Harry Morris's profile picture
Harry Morris4 months ago

Why do you think that? Nuclear is good for base load, but wind is complemented by dispatchable generation.

Dorkomundo's profile picture
Dorkomundo4 months ago

Ha. If the nuclear can cover for when there is no wind the the expensive eyesores are no longer needed.

lady barkley's profile picture
lady barkley4 months ago

Sorry,we dont need nuclear,we have gazillions of cubic metres of gas in our reserves that are known!Only the fake green agenda is stopping us,along with our oil reserves which could be exploited & arent!Irish people pay the price for treasonous"govts"they've put up with for years

Related Videos