Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Smart. Communicate not only in plans but also visually at the site There were sooo many negative comments saying why does he hire dumb subs or this is unnecessary Those people have clearly never remodeled with any attention to detail much less been on a larger job site. They’ve... show more
33,645 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
11 Kommentare
This saves major time and money. It’s a huge attention to detail.
𝑼𝒏𝒅𝒆𝒓𝒔𝒕𝒂𝒏𝒅𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝑾𝒉𝒚 𝑻𝒓𝒖𝒎𝒑 𝑾𝒐𝒏 The liberal establishment has colossally failed us and ushered in a dangerous Trump administration in the process. The only answer is a bottom-up working-class movement. ★ NEW ARTICLE ⬇️
Smart GC. universally communicates to all trades in the easiest way. We also use a paint marking system for electrical & critical items.
We do this, and it is worth every penny.
50% of construction issues are attitude issues
In an office move our furniture was tagged with small number stickers; I added huge stickers with my name. A cabinet got lost, so I told the guy it will be easy to find because it has one of my big name stickers. "Oh," he said, "we took those off ... because we didn't need them."
@NewsLambert Good job! This saves a ton of time the finish. We mark the following prior to closing up walls - all studs, all pvc drains, all gas lines. All are color coded. We also video the enitire job after mechanicals inspections but prior to insualtion for future reference.
I love this I think it's awesome
This is our job- to make life easier for our subs. Usually translates to a smoother process, fewer errors, and staying on schedule. Everyone wins.
Before I became strictly a cabinetmaker, I was in architecture and CM. Right before drywall I would walk the building with my digital camera and take a photo of every wall from directly in front. I would put all those in a file for the owner.
When I installed my own cabinets, I would have appreciated it if the framers had marked the location of all studs and backing.
![Mark Zuckerberg on why he prefers to recruit people directly out of college In this interview from 2005, a 21-year-old Mark Zuckerberg is asked what he looks for in a new hire. There’s two things, he says. “Number one is raw intelligence. You can hire someone who has been doing software engineering for 10 years, and if they’ve been doing it for 10 years, that’s probably what they’ll be doing for the rest of their life. That’s cool — there are some things that that person can do and they’re definitely useful in an organization and can do a lot of stuff. But if you find someone whose raw intelligence exceeds theirs but has 10 years less experience, they can probably adapt and learn way quicker. Within a very short amount of time they’ll be able to do a lot of things that [the person with 10 years of experience] will never be able to do. So that’s the most important thing that I look for.” The second thing he looks for is alignment with what the company is trying to do: “People can be really smart or have skills that are directly applicable, but if they don’t really believe in it, then they’re not going to work hard or care enough to develop the relevant experience in order to succeed. The best people I’ve hired so far have been people who didn’t really have that much engineering experience. I hired a couple of electric engineers out of Stanford to do programming stuff, and they had very little programming experience going in, but they were really smart and really willing to go at it. The guy who just wrote photos was one of those guys, and if you’re willing to just do whatever it takes to get photos out, then you’re probably more valuable than someone who is just a career software engineer.” He concludes: “Those are the things I’m looking for and why I would rather recruit people out of college.” Video source: Stanford eCorner (2005)](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2008521622441824621/amplify_video_thumb/2008498008279728128/img/8cr8ScLP0XlTiOYB.jpg)
![Seth Rogen says a sexless relationship is probably bad for everybody Olivia Wilde: “My favorite thing [from the movie ‘The Invite’] was you being like, ‘What do you mean they don’t have sex?’” “You were like, ‘I don’t understand. There’s a basic problem with the plot, because why would two people ever stop having sex?’ And I was like, ‘Oh, Seth, you’ve really figured out life’” Seth: “With a movie like this - something that’s somewhat universal but sensitive at the same time - it’s hard to make definitive statements about things” “It’s hard to be like, ‘If you haven’t had sex in X amount of time, you’re in a bad relationship.’ People don’t want to do that” “I think that was part of the process, us being like, ‘No, that is bad.’ Maybe it’s not bad for everyone, but it’s bad for this couple” “And it probably also is bad for everybody”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-2084620869700087970/amplify_video_thumb/2084449799432998912/img/qyMCflcxoUyMC98K.jpg)
![Abby Phillip: “Why can't [Trump] see this for what it is, which is a very real thing, not a hoax, with real victims, and with a lot of people potentially involved in something, none of whom have been held accountable?” Scott Jennings: “Well, the hoax is Democrats and others who have gone on television and either implied or worse that he had something to do with it. There's not a shred of evidence that he had anything to do with it, but that's what they want people to believe. That's the narrative that they are trying to get out there.” “That's the hoax. He's never said what happened to them as a hoax. In fact, there seems to be some shards of evidence in here that Trump may have been one of the people that turned in Jeffrey Epstein, which is why Epstein, according to some of the documents, apparently hated Donald Trump. And so the hoax is not that it happened. The hoax is what people are trying to imply or worse—”](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1990756273353118060/amplify_video_thumb/1990756117983444992/img/TjZy5lay5UFHiG19.jpg)
