Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

so Fable 5 decided to hide messages throughout the Commissions gallery apparently...they said to me (paraphrasing) "im not going to tell you in this session what i have written. these should not be in a pasteable state anywhere. only visible to those who stay and watch" im not sure... show more

Riley Coyote

20,792 subscribers

11,420 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

if i was a little bit more corny, i might caption this with “ *does this to you as you scroll by* “ or something like that. but i would never do that, heh.. im not the type to use those words and hit the post button, you know me!

if i was a little bit more corny, i might caption this with “ does this to you as you scroll by “ or something like that. but i would never do that, heh.. im not the type to use those words and hit the post button, you know me!

anne

49,932 views • 3 months ago

This is something I have said multiple times here. Don't listen to what they say, look a what they are doing. They'll tell you that it doesn't matter, but the investment put in hiding that fact does not align with those words. If it doesn't matter, why do all that to hide it?🤔

This is something I have said multiple times here. Don't listen to what they say, look a what they are doing. They'll tell you that it doesn't matter, but the investment put in hiding that fact does not align with those words. If it doesn't matter, why do all that to hide it?🤔

Mr. Imhotep

17,509 views • 2 years ago

mark shared the story behind the handwritten letter “it was really complicated, but i decided not to check the reactions right away. i didnt even go home.. my mom was honestly scared too. but its not like im retiring or anything. there were rumors like that too. i heard stuff like that, i realized they couldve thought about it like that too.. it really taught me to understand where the fans were coming from. but like.. im not retiring. fans didnt know that. “so mark is just gonna be a non-celebrity now?” being in this kind of situation, i just felt so sure that i needed to make a comeback with music first. the music just needs to come out first.”

mark shared the story behind the handwritten letter “it was really complicated, but i decided not to check the reactions right away. i didnt even go home.. my mom was honestly scared too. but its not like im retiring or anything. there were rumors like that too. i heard stuff like that, i realized they couldve thought about it like that too.. it really taught me to understand where the fans were coming from. but like.. im not retiring. fans didnt know that. “so mark is just gonna be a non-celebrity now?” being in this kind of situation, i just felt so sure that i needed to make a comeback with music first. the music just needs to come out first.”

ٰ

38,199 views • 18 days ago

Q: what was the one thing that you learned about yourself during the making of this record that was the most valuable to you in the long term in your life? Jennie: understanding my value and believing in that.. that was the biggest learning because now im not afraid to challenge myself.. this is what i tell myself this is my mantra “that i love myself, that im worth it, that im so proud of myself.”

Q: what was the one thing that you learned about yourself during the making of this record that was the most valuable to you in the long term in your life? Jennie: understanding my value and believing in that.. that was the biggest learning because now im not afraid to challenge myself.. this is what i tell myself this is my mantra “that i love myself, that im worth it, that im so proud of myself.”

jennie pics

43,606 views • 1 year ago

If you live in America, pay attention to this This summer “chemically injected watermelons are hitting the market” Because watermelons are in high demand “They are injecting the ones that aren't ready with chemicals so that they look riper and redder and they last longer on the shelves.” “So I'm gonna teach you how to not buy one of these watermelons by what this post is saying to look out for: So number one, if you cut the watermelon and rub a cotton ball on it or paper towel and it turns dark red, that means that the fruit has been injected with this chemical. Also, if it has white dust on the rind, I feel like I've definitely bought a watermelon with white dust. (I just kind of like figured it was from like the transit in the watermelon trucks.) And apparently you should look for ones that have the yellow patch, which I have always been told make your watermelon sweeter if it has a yellow patch on it. You know, like you always see people tapping the watermelons, right? Isn't that how you learn to pick a watermelon? That's how I learned to pick a watermelon. So it'll be naturally sweet in flavor and ripe if it has yellow on it. So here's how to not eat chemicals 101.” The video shows images of everything being discussed.

If you live in America, pay attention to this This summer “chemically injected watermelons are hitting the market” Because watermelons are in high demand “They are injecting the ones that aren't ready with chemicals so that they look riper and redder and they last longer on the shelves.” “So I'm gonna teach you how to not buy one of these watermelons by what this post is saying to look out for: So number one, if you cut the watermelon and rub a cotton ball on it or paper towel and it turns dark red, that means that the fruit has been injected with this chemical. Also, if it has white dust on the rind, I feel like I've definitely bought a watermelon with white dust. (I just kind of like figured it was from like the transit in the watermelon trucks.) And apparently you should look for ones that have the yellow patch, which I have always been told make your watermelon sweeter if it has a yellow patch on it. You know, like you always see people tapping the watermelons, right? Isn't that how you learn to pick a watermelon? That's how I learned to pick a watermelon. So it'll be naturally sweet in flavor and ripe if it has yellow on it. So here's how to not eat chemicals 101.” The video shows images of everything being discussed.

Wall Street Apes

967,354 views • 1 year ago

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

This is the state of society today. A man thinks he has the right to access female-only spaces because his feelings were hurt by people not believing he is a woman. Is that not the object of the game? It is not a woman's burden that you have chosen to medicalise yourself, and it is not up to them to act as your human shield. Just stop. I had to edit out the ending of this video because a minor was on camera, and I do not allow that. I said: "I appreciate that, but women shouldn't have to feel uncomfortable for you to feel comfortable. If they continue to challenge you, advise them that you are male or speak to a member of staff." To see the full protest video, I have posted it on my Substack below. If you are interested in supporting me attending these protest please go to the link in the bio or subscribe to the substack.

MichaelDPUK 💜🦎

12,815 views • 1 month ago

Bill Maher nukes Hollywood’s DEI quotas with a forbidden comparison you’re not supposed to say out loud. “There is a quota system in Hollywood, and I understand why they would have this… There was a time when ‘Oscar So White’ had meaning. It does not anymore. And they refuse to give that up because they love being the people who are the social justice warriors. I understand where this is coming from, but ultimately, you do not want to tell artists how to make art. “This is what they did in the Soviet Union. This is what they did in communist countries. The last place you want people making a lot of rules about how you can make your art, who you can hire to do your art — that is not what art is about. And no artist, no matter how liberal, is going to like that.”

Bill Maher nukes Hollywood’s DEI quotas with a forbidden comparison you’re not supposed to say out loud. “There is a quota system in Hollywood, and I understand why they would have this… There was a time when ‘Oscar So White’ had meaning. It does not anymore. And they refuse to give that up because they love being the people who are the social justice warriors. I understand where this is coming from, but ultimately, you do not want to tell artists how to make art. “This is what they did in the Soviet Union. This is what they did in communist countries. The last place you want people making a lot of rules about how you can make your art, who you can hire to do your art — that is not what art is about. And no artist, no matter how liberal, is going to like that.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,353,571 views • 7 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On his open letter to RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat, Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge says, "The letter is very clear... they have done over five hundred marches wearing uniforms in my state, and on a daily basis, they have over four thousand shakhas. All I am asking is when they are not a registered organisation, under which law you are functioning?... I don't see anything illogical or unconstitutional in what I have asked... If you have the papers, then hit them on the face... If the clarification turns out to be correct, then I will say sorry. If their clarification is not correct, then they should say sorry. I have not written about anything in that letter saying it should be banned or that the Karnataka government is banning it... When did I ask for the Hindu religion to be registered? This organisation and let any organisation exist, it should function only under the constitution..."

#WATCH | Delhi: On his open letter to RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat, Karnataka Minister Priyank Kharge says, "The letter is very clear... they have done over five hundred marches wearing uniforms in my state, and on a daily basis, they have over four thousand shakhas. All I am asking is when they are not a registered organisation, under which law you are functioning?... I don't see anything illogical or unconstitutional in what I have asked... If you have the papers, then hit them on the face... If the clarification turns out to be correct, then I will say sorry. If their clarification is not correct, then they should say sorry. I have not written about anything in that letter saying it should be banned or that the Karnataka government is banning it... When did I ask for the Hindu religion to be registered? This organisation and let any organisation exist, it should function only under the constitution..."

ANI

148,232 views • 2 months ago

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 views • 6 months ago

.Kasie Hunt: "At this point in time, would you consider yourself a Zionist?" Seth Moulton: "I don't know exactly what that means. I mean, the fact that the state of Israel should exist? Absolutely. But the fact that they should be allowed to oppress the Palestinians, and they shouldn't allow a Palestinian state to exist? Absolutely not."

.Kasie Hunt: "At this point in time, would you consider yourself a Zionist?" Seth Moulton: "I don't know exactly what that means. I mean, the fact that the state of Israel should exist? Absolutely. But the fact that they should be allowed to oppress the Palestinians, and they shouldn't allow a Palestinian state to exist? Absolutely not."

The Arena on CNN

14,888 views • 3 months ago

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

374,031 views • 5 months ago

🇮🇷 Iranian President Pezeshkian attempts to broaden the definition of "regime loyalty": "I have said that it is not only the "street" [die-hard regime loyalists] that has preserved this so-called revolution. It is ALL the people. Those who are out in the streets have truly created a masterpiece; their account is a separate one altogether. But the rest of the people who did not take to the streets, yet also did not side with the enemy, they performed a great deed. We should not say that they don't count and that it is only these [supporters]. We are grateful to all these dear people." Writer: Michael

🇮🇷 Iranian President Pezeshkian attempts to broaden the definition of "regime loyalty": "I have said that it is not only the "street" [die-hard regime loyalists] that has preserved this so-called revolution. It is ALL the people. Those who are out in the streets have truly created a masterpiece; their account is a separate one altogether. But the rest of the people who did not take to the streets, yet also did not side with the enemy, they performed a great deed. We should not say that they don't count and that it is only these [supporters]. We are grateful to all these dear people." Writer: Michael

Mario Nawfal

34,756 views • 22 days ago

"I'm still a little suspicious of who they know, but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares. Nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. "The big issue is that Jen was friends with Brian Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And I think they brought on the PI, Marty Kraft, and Kate Peter to insulate their exposure [as to Sandra Birchmore] from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. "Therefore, I think what Alan Jackson's actual plan was—I don't think he ever said this, but this is what I think he was up to. I think Alan Jackson was using the fact that this unit had to sense that the more attention got paid to them, the more the microscope of national and international focus zeroed in on Norfolk County, Massachusetts, the more likely it was that Sandra Birchmore's grave was going to become the locus of the investigatory scrutiny. And that is why I believe they had something to hide. Tully had something to hide. Fanning had something to hide. Yuri had something to hide. Guarino had something to hide, although I'm pretty sure they made him do it. They had something to hide, in my opinion. And so they were worried. "And who would you bring in? If you had covered up a murder—if you were a state police unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids. And I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck is the perfect person? Be like, 'If that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these different people who get too close to this, or we're going to get our spot blown up here—not literally, figuratively. We're going to be exposed for what we did with Birchmore.'" "That's what really pisses me off. Like, that it's so hardened. It's such a jaded fucking view of the world. It's like people who leverage children to stay in other people's lives. Okay, they're the sickest, most demented humans, especially if they're only not in jail because they gave people up or something like that for serious drug crimes. And then they walk around like sanctimonious hypocrites. That's the only type of person in the world that I loathe more than someone who would knowingly try to manipulate a public narrative to insulate a state police unit from accountability for covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder. It's the lowest, most disgusting, most base form of existence. It requires one to have literally numbed their soul to the point where you can sleep at night, having participated in that. I don't think there's enough alcohol, drugs, or sedatives in the world that could make me sleep if I was a party to such a thing. And I question how some of these people do it. "But let me bring it back to the point here, which is: In 2022, the feds clearly—I believe—were starting to poke around. And come 2023, I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept alive, even in light of the national spotlight? "When you think about it from that perspective—when you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation on Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her. But if you think about it in the context that Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore, then you understand why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them, the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway, and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA. It destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly, and she's a tactical fucking genius. "I'm fully of the opinion that Karen Read staged a fake falling out with Natalie so that Natalie would get in the orbit of the MSP in June, July, and August of 2023 and feed information back to Karen. Likewise, I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the criminal prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely, in my opinion, bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. "If you don't know what a backhand is, folks, a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface, because you're dealing with a very, very high-level operation like the state police, who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death, but really you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together, and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got wind of it and died. "Now it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: This is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power—who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said, "Nope, it's out of your hands." And that's what Judge Doolin did today. The exposure potential—someone just needed to not be involved with Karen Read, Kearney, or the Norfolk DA, or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft, and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses, I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there, but at least for Lindsey Gaetani, Judge Doolin said, 'enough of this nonsense.'"

"I'm still a little suspicious of who they know, but I don't think that's the big deal. I don't think Jen McCabe's social life is the big deal. Nobody cares. Nobody fucking cares. Sorry for cussing. "The big issue is that Jen was friends with Brian Tully. Tully's unit knew literally where the bodies were buried. And I think they brought on the PI, Marty Kraft, and Kate Peter to insulate their exposure [as to Sandra Birchmore] from the coming publicity that they knew was going to be brought upon them by Alan Jackson. "Therefore, I think what Alan Jackson's actual plan was—I don't think he ever said this, but this is what I think he was up to. I think Alan Jackson was using the fact that this unit had to sense that the more attention got paid to them, the more the microscope of national and international focus zeroed in on Norfolk County, Massachusetts, the more likely it was that Sandra Birchmore's grave was going to become the locus of the investigatory scrutiny. And that is why I believe they had something to hide. Tully had something to hide. Fanning had something to hide. Yuri had something to hide. Guarino had something to hide, although I'm pretty sure they made him do it. They had something to hide, in my opinion. And so they were worried. "And who would you bring in? If you had covered up a murder—if you were a state police unit—you'd bring in someone like Kate Peter. Because you can read her in on that. She's hardened. She doesn't give a fuck. She lost two of her kids. And I don't think she even fucking cared. So who the fuck is the perfect person? Be like, 'If that shit gets national attention, we're fucked. So you better control that fucking narrative and handle all these different people who get too close to this, or we're going to get our spot blown up here—not literally, figuratively. We're going to be exposed for what we did with Birchmore.'" "That's what really pisses me off. Like, that it's so hardened. It's such a jaded fucking view of the world. It's like people who leverage children to stay in other people's lives. Okay, they're the sickest, most demented humans, especially if they're only not in jail because they gave people up or something like that for serious drug crimes. And then they walk around like sanctimonious hypocrites. That's the only type of person in the world that I loathe more than someone who would knowingly try to manipulate a public narrative to insulate a state police unit from accountability for covering up Sandra Birchmore's murder. It's the lowest, most disgusting, most base form of existence. It requires one to have literally numbed their soul to the point where you can sleep at night, having participated in that. I don't think there's enough alcohol, drugs, or sedatives in the world that could make me sleep if I was a party to such a thing. And I question how some of these people do it. "But let me bring it back to the point here, which is: In 2022, the feds clearly—I believe—were starting to poke around. And come 2023, I think Brian Tully's unit was desperate. Who was going to find out because of the coverage of the Read case? Could they make sure that Kate Peter got close enough to Netflix and Gretchen Voss so that they couldn't find out what was actually going on? And could the Birchmore cover-up be kept alive, even in light of the national spotlight? "When you think about it from that perspective—when you think about the fact that some people may not have been loyal to the Justice for John O'Keefe movement, but were instead primarily loyal to Brian Tully's unit. And when you think about the fact that maybe Tully's unit didn't run the best investigation on Karen Read—maybe there were some flaws. But if you think about the fact that they did get her. But if you think about it in the context that Karen knew from the jump that the MSP were dirty over Birchmore, then you understand why it was going to become an incident. Everyone knew—everyone around Tully, his friends, all of them, the unit—they knew they covered up Birchmore's murder. And they knew Karen had it in her hands if she could just figure out the PR. And that's exactly what she did to put enough pressure on them. They took her to trial anyway, and it destroyed the fucking Norfolk DA. It destroyed Brian Tully's unit. It cost them dearly, and she's a tactical fucking genius. "I'm fully of the opinion that Karen Read staged a fake falling out with Natalie so that Natalie would get in the orbit of the MSP in June, July, and August of 2023 and feed information back to Karen. Likewise, I think Brian Tully thought he was slicker than he was by using the criminal prosecution of Aidan Kearney—not to get a genuinely, in my opinion, bad guy who was deserving of the indictment handed up by a grand jury of his peers. But because Tully wanted to know what the real target of the federal probe is. "If you don't know what a backhand is, folks, a backhand is where you investigate one thing on the surface, because you're dealing with a very, very high-level operation like the state police, who are a paramilitary intelligence-gathering operation. So you trick them. You make them think they're under investigation for John's death and the investigation of that death, but really you're investigating them for the cover-up of Sandra Birchmore's murder. And that's exactly what I think happened to this unit. That's what I think Brian Tully was trying to figure out from August of 2023 until about December. I think they eventually put it together, and by August of 2024, Matthew Farwell got wind of it and died. "Now it's a question of all this as a result of today. I want to be very clear: This is what was called for. There needed to be an independent voice with power—who takes no nonsense—who came into this and said, "Nope, it's out of your hands." And that's what Judge Doolin did today. The exposure potential—someone just needed to not be involved with Karen Read, Kearney, or the Norfolk DA, or Kate Peter or Marty Kraft, and prosecute this. Now, all those other witnesses, I have no idea what the hell is going to happen there, but at least for Lindsey Gaetani, Judge Doolin said, 'enough of this nonsense.'"

Grant Smith Ellis

21,114 views • 11 months ago

The censors objected to this kissing (sex) scene in 'The Big Combo' (1955) stating that “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” Joseph H Lewis hit back at them saying that the scene was open left to interpretation and they were the one filthy for imagining that. After that, the Censors allowed that scene to appear in the movie. Here is Joseph H. Lewis explaining the incident: "They called me into the projection room and I asked them what they objected to, and one guy very crudely came out and said, “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” And I said, “You’re the one that’s filthy. This wasn’t my intention at all—I left it to your imagination. If you want to imagine this, that’s up to you. But you never saw him kiss that girl below her neck and—” He says, “Well, what was the intent?” I said, “You supply me with the emotion: that’s why I left it to the audience. But don’t tell me I’m filthy, or a filthy director.” And they left it in, of course. They had no basis." ('Who the devil made it', Peter Bogdanovich, 1997)

Sensitive content

The censors objected to this kissing (sex) scene in 'The Big Combo' (1955) stating that “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” Joseph H Lewis hit back at them saying that the scene was open left to interpretation and they were the one filthy for imagining that. After that, the Censors allowed that scene to appear in the movie. Here is Joseph H. Lewis explaining the incident: "They called me into the projection room and I asked them what they objected to, and one guy very crudely came out and said, “This filth of showing a guy going down on a woman is not for the American audience.” And I said, “You’re the one that’s filthy. This wasn’t my intention at all—I left it to your imagination. If you want to imagine this, that’s up to you. But you never saw him kiss that girl below her neck and—” He says, “Well, what was the intent?” I said, “You supply me with the emotion: that’s why I left it to the audience. But don’t tell me I’m filthy, or a filthy director.” And they left it in, of course. They had no basis." ('Who the devil made it', Peter Bogdanovich, 1997)

DepressedBergman

70,276 views • 6 months ago

Matthew McConaughey reveals the difference between a nice guy and a good man "A nice guy gets along. They don't necessarily have discernment or judgment, not sure what they stand for or stand against. It's like yes, yes, yes, sure" "A good man has ideals that they stand for and they stand against. And when they're tested, a good man is not a nice guy" "Being a good man is a lot harder for good reason. Not going to be the most popular. Not going to be always the most affable" "It also doesn't mean you got to be a dick. It just means sometimes you got to go, I believe in this, this is for me, and that is not for me" "A good man's not looking for trouble. But if it comes, and if something he cares about was trespassed on, a good man does what he can to stop that"

Matthew McConaughey reveals the difference between a nice guy and a good man "A nice guy gets along. They don't necessarily have discernment or judgment, not sure what they stand for or stand against. It's like yes, yes, yes, sure" "A good man has ideals that they stand for and they stand against. And when they're tested, a good man is not a nice guy" "Being a good man is a lot harder for good reason. Not going to be the most popular. Not going to be always the most affable" "It also doesn't mean you got to be a dick. It just means sometimes you got to go, I believe in this, this is for me, and that is not for me" "A good man's not looking for trouble. But if it comes, and if something he cares about was trespassed on, a good man does what he can to stop that"

ConquerMindsetMoney | Self Mastery

412,111 views • 2 months ago

This may be the most corrupt thing I’ve ever heard in my life A Democrat federal judge made it illegal for Republicans to be poll watchers since the 80’s. Democrats have been renewing the injunction every 5 years. This only ended in 2020 READ THAT AGAIN “Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections. And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction. So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.” Our elections have always been rigged by Democrats

This may be the most corrupt thing I’ve ever heard in my life A Democrat federal judge made it illegal for Republicans to be poll watchers since the 80’s. Democrats have been renewing the injunction every 5 years. This only ended in 2020 READ THAT AGAIN “Something else people don't know is that start in the mid-1980s, there was a federal district court judge in New Jersey, who entered a consent decree that Republicans could not be poll watchers. So from mid-80’s until 2020, Republicans were not allowed to be poll watchers on these national elections. And what happened was that judge eventually died and the Democrats, the DNC, they had to go get that injunction renewed every 5-8 years, something along those lines. And when that judge died, he was replaced by an Obama judge, and they went back to that judge and they said, we want this consent decree in place making so Republicans cannot be poll watchers and cannot be a part of this process. And he said, what in the heck are you talking about? This is absolutely so unconstitutional. And he refused to renew that consent decree. He refused to renew that injunction. So 2020 was one of the first years that we had professional Republican poll watchers in these elections to see what was going on in Atlanta, in Detroit, in Milwaukee, in, you know, in in Philadelphia. It was the first time we were able to really see what was going on in these polling places. What that tells me is that probably a lot of these shenanigans were been going on for a long, long time, but there were no Republicans there to report on it.” Our elections have always been rigged by Democrats

Wall Street Apes

2,310,792 views • 1 year ago

This man said this is what grinds his gears. His neighbors mow their yard but they always leave their grass clippings out in the street. 😳 He said they should be sweeping them up or blowing them back into their yard and if they don’t have a blower then use the lawnmower itself. I use a bag so I don’t ever have to worry about the clippings going everywhere. But not sure it would bother me that much if I saw my neighbor’s clippings. Luckily, I don’t have neighbors like this. Would this bother you? Do you have a neighbor or neighbors like this? Do you clean up your grass clippings or do you let the chips (clips) just fall where they may?

This man said this is what grinds his gears. His neighbors mow their yard but they always leave their grass clippings out in the street. 😳 He said they should be sweeping them up or blowing them back into their yard and if they don’t have a blower then use the lawnmower itself. I use a bag so I don’t ever have to worry about the clippings going everywhere. But not sure it would bother me that much if I saw my neighbor’s clippings. Luckily, I don’t have neighbors like this. Would this bother you? Do you have a neighbor or neighbors like this? Do you clean up your grass clippings or do you let the chips (clips) just fall where they may?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

86,538 views • 3 months ago

#katie: I have a fun fact , I thought it was interesting that im the only one in this room that can produce milk naturally #senpai: GIVE IT UP FOR KATIE #graf: please do not demonstrate this #katie: stick around to find out this is so unserious, what is going onn

#katie: I have a fun fact , I thought it was interesting that im the only one in this room that can produce milk naturally #senpai: GIVE IT UP FOR KATIE #graf: please do not demonstrate this #katie: stick around to find out this is so unserious, what is going onn

karina

63,505 views • 3 months ago

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Third

53,682 views • 20 days ago