Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🚨 Socialism 2026 Panel Debates Whether “Settler Colonialism” Is Too Imprecise and Needs to Be “White Settler Colonialism” At Socialism 2026’s “Ocean Deep Solidarity: Reparations, LANDBACK, and Collective Liberation” panel, Raven Schwam-Curtis invokes UVA professor Tiffany King for some galaxy-brain theorizing over whether “settler colonialism” is simply too imprecise....

2,629,806 просмотров • 1 день назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

WESTERN TYPE OF ELECTIONS ARE NOW IN GRAVE JEOPARDY in southern African countries with a history of white settler colonialism or apartheid rule. This is because white monopoly interests in the region that are rooted in British and Portuguese white settler colonialism or apartheid rule - represented by white led organisations like the Brenthurst Foundation of the Oppenheimers - have identified elections as the new and most convenient battle ground for destabilising or toppling governing former liberation movements. Their new strategy is three-pronged: (i) they sponsor parties that they hope might win, as they did last month in Namibia; (ii) if their sponsored party loses, they fund their running dogs to dispute the results by challenging them in or outside the courts to delegitimatise the victory of the governing former liberation movement that would have won the election; again, as is the ongoing case in Namibia; or, (iii) if the country in question is fragile and has simmering or open violent conflict, as for example is the case with conflict-ridden Mozambique; they fund their running dogs to dispute the election results violently, and they use that violence to demand negotiations for a coalition or 'unity' government; with claims that the whole region will burn and South Africa will suffer the most from a refugee influx, if this does not happen. It is for this reason that elections in the southern African countries that suffered white settler colonialism or apartheid are no longer a democratic contest, but have become a clear and present national security danger; bordering on an existential threat. As a result, the state of democratic elections in the region has now reached another level!

Prof Jonathan Moyo

89,583 просмотров • 1 год назад

Just made a short video to explain why it is racist and problematic for Australia to arrest accused Chinese spies. Firstly, arresting accused CCP spies actively boosts Sinophobic racism and therefore undermines Australia's successful multicultural framework. Secondly, this Chinese spy helped boost GDP growth. She took hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Chinese government and invested it right back here in Australia. She bought multiple investment properties which actually actively boosts investment in the wider Australian housing market - thereby helping more young Australians get a foot on the property ladder. Thirdly, I believe that it is racist to expect migrants to assimilate to Australian culture. Expecting migrants to assimilate to the country is a harmful stereotype from the White Australia settler-colonial era, one that we have thankfully progressed past as a country. Lastly but perhaps most importantly, Australia is ultimately Stolen Land. Sovereignty was never ceded, so how can we complain when the Chinese government violates our sovereignty? Ultimately it is about time that white Australians experience settler colonialism ourselves so as to develop empathy for what our ancestors did. By being spied upon and attacked in our own countries, we can develop new insight into the toxicity of white settler-colonial culture, and thereby hopefully rid ourselves of its lingering toxic effects. Thank you for listening guys. Would appreciate your thoughts.

Drew Pavlou 🇦🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼

12,413 просмотров • 1 год назад

What is striking about His Majesty the King of the Thembu nation is not that we agree with his position — we clearly do not — but that he does not hide where he stands. Unlike many who pretend to be “neutral” while quietly siding with imperialism, he openly declares his position. And that honesty, ironically, helps us educate workers, because it exposes the real nature of these global divisions. Firstly, His Majesty justifies his support for Israel on religious grounds. He speaks as if today’s Israeli state is the same as the Israel of biblical times — as if modern geopolitics is scripture, and as if bombs, occupation and war are somehow holy. This is one of the biggest pieces of propaganda used to justify genocide. The state that is slaughtering women and children in Gaza did not exist in biblical times. It did not fall from heaven. It was created in 1948 through settler-colonialism, land dispossession and the ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. This is not religion. This is modern colonialism backed by Western imperial powers. And there is an even deeper contradiction. The very people he is trying so hard to impress — calling them “children of Jesus Christ” — are not even Christians. They are Jewish. Judaism and Christianity are two different religions with different beliefs and theology. Judaism does not recognise Jesus as the son of God. So how can Benjamin Netanyahu suddenly be described as a “son of Jesus”? This is not theology. It is political manipulation dressed up as faith. Religion is being abused to sanitise occupation, apartheid and mass killing. Genocide cannot be baptised with scripture. Secondly, His Majesty says he is “no longer with the East but now with the West.” This reveals another dangerous way of thinking. It suggests that human rights are not a principle, but something that depends on which global power you align with. Yesterday, abuses were tolerated because they came from the East. Today, abuses are tolerated because they come from the West. So morality changes depending on who commits the crime. Some of us reject that completely. For the working class, injustice is injustice — no matter who commits it. Human rights abuse is human rights abuse. Colonialism is colonialism. Imperialism is imperialism. Oligarchy is oligarchy. It does not matter whether it comes from Washington, Moscow, London or Beijing. We do not choose between empires. We stand with the oppressed everywhere — always. That is the politics of principle. That is international solidarity. That is the position of the working class.

Zwelinzima Vavi

45,838 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🔴Kwame Ture on Why Karl Marx Did Not Invent Socialism and the Myth That African Liberation Must Be Separated from It Kwame Ture explains here that Karl Marx did not invent socialism and that socialism emerges from material conditions, not Europe. Marx did not create socialism any more than Newton created gravity. He observed, analyzed, and systematized laws that exist independently of him. This directly challenges the claim that scientific socialism is a Western imposition on African liberation because it “came after” Marx. The issue is not chronology, but development. African peoples did not need Marx to recognize exploitation, struggle against domination, or arrive at socialist conclusions. As Ture explains, wherever capital seeks to dominate labor, struggle emerges as a material fact. African resistance to slavery, colonialism, and wage exploitation demonstrates this historically. The clip makes clear that socialism is not “a white thing,” not a European invention, and not alien to African struggle. What Marx contributed was a scientific method for understanding these realities, not the realities themselves. African liberation movements independently developed socialist conclusions as colonial domination matured into capitalism. This affirms African autonomy rather than denying it. Separating Pan-Africanism from scientific socialism on the basis that it predates Marx is not a defense of African history; it is a misunderstanding of how revolutionary struggle develops under material conditions.

Horn of Africa Leftists

39,171 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад