Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Society can't handle this #momson #momandson #caption #momporn #momsonporm #edit #taboo #incest #momcest #fantasy #momlover

@CaptionTv

37,997 subscribers

163,515 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #momson #momandson #caption #momporn #momsonporm #edit #taboo #incest #momcest #fantasy #momlover

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The modern white sister, wide baby making hips, two large round jiggly cheeks. And a pussy that would pull any brother in with her aroma. #incest #taboo #familyfantasy #incestfantasy #tabooincest #familyporn #incestcaption #fantasytaboo #momson #momandson #pawg

The modern white sister, wide baby making hips, two large round jiggly cheeks. And a pussy that would pull any brother in with her aroma. #incest #taboo #familyfantasy #incestfantasy #tabooincest #familyporn #incestcaption #fantasytaboo #momson #momandson #pawg

Mother Lover

20,386 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Edit:8 🔥Incest Mom caught son watching porn turning into sex drama 😋 a complete mom son late night conversation 🙏🏻 Please watch full video and do like and comment guys ...follow & support guys ... Next enna type video edit venum sollunga guys 🙏🏻 #mom #incest #tamil #momson #Edit #hot #amma #porn #tvk #amma #mom #love #vijay tamilperv AI FANTASY STORIES Tamilperv

Edit:8 🔥Incest Mom caught son watching porn turning into sex drama 😋 a complete mom son late night conversation 🙏🏻 Please watch full video and do like and comment guys ...follow & support guys ... Next enna type video edit venum sollunga guys 🙏🏻 #mom #incest #tamil #momson #Edit #hot #amma #porn #tvk #amma #mom #love #vijay tamilperv AI FANTASY STORIES Tamilperv

SG Tamilan

36,873 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

When a construction worker for the data centers is saying the grid can't handle what is coming, you need to listen! Ban DATA CENTERS! We have never been a proactive society. We’ve only been reactive. This is another perfect example!

When a construction worker for the data centers is saying the grid can't handle what is coming, you need to listen! Ban DATA CENTERS! We have never been a proactive society. We’ve only been reactive. This is another perfect example!

Merica 🦋💞

39,181 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

The best comedy 🤣🤣🤣🤣 They don't make TV shows like this anymore. Society couldn't handle it. From the cast, to the clothes they wore and the one liners, no way you can't laugh. Dorthy is straight savage 24 7

The best comedy 🤣🤣🤣🤣 They don't make TV shows like this anymore. Society couldn't handle it. From the cast, to the clothes they wore and the one liners, no way you can't laugh. Dorthy is straight savage 24 7

NRM84

31,917 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

Sneako calls out Asmongold for his take about p*mping out OF women as a streamer and for ducking a debate "How are u saying that p*mping is good if u want to actually protect America..how are u talking about the declining birth rate and actively say that p*mping women is good and that this is what u would do..this is destroying the white race which u love, this is contributing to the decline of society" "And then the demographics get replaced..yikes" "He said back in the beginning of the war in Feb that he'd have a conversation w me..I've yet to see that be played out..if u can't perform under pressure conversationally, then don't tell American troops to go d*e for Israel..I got respect but if u can't even handle high stress games..why should ppl handle warfare?"

Sensitive content

Sneako calls out Asmongold for his take about pmping out OF women as a streamer and for ducking a debate "How are u saying that pmping is good if u want to actually protect America..how are u talking about the declining birth rate and actively say that pmping women is good and that this is what u would do..this is destroying the white race which u love, this is contributing to the decline of society" "And then the demographics get replaced..yikes" "He said back in the beginning of the war in Feb that he'd have a conversation w me..I've yet to see that be played out..if u can't perform under pressure conversationally, then don't tell American troops to go de for Israel..I got respect but if u can't even handle high stress games..why should ppl handle warfare?"

yeet

53,080 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"In Iraq, a mother weeps for her 12-year-old daughter, forced into marriage under a law allowing girls as young as 9 to wed. A man took her, raped her, and now she's trapped. The mother, desperate, pleads with courts that refuse to listen. She cries, 'If my baby gets pregnant, her body can't handle it—her organs aren't developed, she could die.' One court heard her, but a cleric threatened her life if she fought on. What society lets a child suffer like this? The mother asks: if her girl dies from this forced marriage, who's responsible—the law, the clerics, the silence?" - J.N

"In Iraq, a mother weeps for her 12-year-old daughter, forced into marriage under a law allowing girls as young as 9 to wed. A man took her, raped her, and now she's trapped. The mother, desperate, pleads with courts that refuse to listen. She cries, 'If my baby gets pregnant, her body can't handle it—her organs aren't developed, she could die.' One court heard her, but a cleric threatened her life if she fought on. What society lets a child suffer like this? The mother asks: if her girl dies from this forced marriage, who's responsible—the law, the clerics, the silence?" - J.N

Imtiaz Mahmood

105,367 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

#NamtanFilm #น้ำตาลฟิล์ม 👤: (Asking Film if she can handle the #Herรักของเธอ cast) 🤍: Phi, Film has changed. She's grown up now. ❤️‍🩹: I mess around with them too. Society has shaped me, so I join in and mess around with them. 🤍: She's turned. ❤️‍🩹: If we can't resist, we join them. 🤍: And she plays Bambi in #GirlRulesSeries. She's already turned. ❤️‍🩹: Hui! I don't want you to say it. 🤍: Show it, show it. ❤️‍🩹: Show what, Phi? 🤍: Show it. ❤️‍🩹: Show what~? 👤: Nowadays, she puts her hands on her hips at you. 🤍: She fights back. Sometimes, I just sit and think I shouldn't have taught her to be like this ❤️‍🩹: No, Phi likes to... Phi likes to tease me. 🤍: But it's good, I like it. She's lively. I like the way she is like this. 👤: How does she tease you in a way that makes you go, "Uh! No way!" ❤️‍🩹: A lot. A lottt. She likes joking around with others and then goes, "My girlfriend will get jealous, you know?" This! 🤍: "She doesn't like teasing me, but she likes me," say it. I'm kidding.

#NamtanFilm #น้ำตาลฟิล์ม 👤: (Asking Film if she can handle the #Herรักของเธอ cast) 🤍: Phi, Film has changed. She's grown up now. ❤️‍🩹: I mess around with them too. Society has shaped me, so I join in and mess around with them. 🤍: She's turned. ❤️‍🩹: If we can't resist, we join them. 🤍: And she plays Bambi in #GirlRulesSeries. She's already turned. ❤️‍🩹: Hui! I don't want you to say it. 🤍: Show it, show it. ❤️‍🩹: Show what, Phi? 🤍: Show it. ❤️‍🩹: Show what~? 👤: Nowadays, she puts her hands on her hips at you. 🤍: She fights back. Sometimes, I just sit and think I shouldn't have taught her to be like this ❤️‍🩹: No, Phi likes to... Phi likes to tease me. 🤍: But it's good, I like it. She's lively. I like the way she is like this. 👤: How does she tease you in a way that makes you go, "Uh! No way!" ❤️‍🩹: A lot. A lottt. She likes joking around with others and then goes, "My girlfriend will get jealous, you know?" This! 🤍: "She doesn't like teasing me, but she likes me," say it. I'm kidding.

Columbus 🌙

80,555 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

📖SEEDANCE 2.0 JUST MADE EVERY FILM SCHOOL IRRELEVANT FOR SOLO CREATORS Solo creators with the right workflow are closing clients that used to require a full production studio. Seedance 2.0 inside Dreamina holds character consistency across scenes in a way no other tool at this price point comes close to. Same face, same costume, same lighting logic — frame after frame after frame. That's the feature that turns a single prompt session into a short film. The lava demon materializing inside a gothic cathedral. The girl in black holding her ground while everything burns around her. Two characters with completely different visual languages sharing the same atmospheric world — and Seedance holds both of them consistent across every cut. That's not a generation. That's a production. Here's the 7-step workflow that produced this: • Step 1 — Define the character before you define the scene. Write a complete physical description — face structure, hair, clothing, skin, posture. This becomes the anchor every future generation references. • Step 2 — Build the world separately from the character. Gothic cathedral, candlelight, fog, cracked stone, scattered bodies. Define the atmosphere as its own entity before you place anyone inside it. • Step 3 — Generate the reference frame. One image that establishes the visual language, the color grade, the lighting temperature. Lock this as your style reference before generating any video. • Step 4 — Feed the reference into Seedance's image-to-video pipeline with a motion prompt. Camera behavior only — slow push, hold, circle. The image handles the subject. The prompt handles the direction. • Step 5 — Generate four variations per scene. Delete the two that look generated. Keep the one where the character's face holds and the atmosphere feels physical rather than rendered. • Step 6 — Edit in CapCut or Premiere Pro. Add music that matches the emotional temperature of the grade — the visual already tells you what the sound should feel like. Dark orchestral, slow tempo, single instrument carrying the melody. • Step 7 — Save the character description and reference frame as a template. The next episode starts from the same character in the same world. Series content becomes a system, not a restart. How a freelancer sells this: Dark fantasy content for game studios, music artists, and fantasy brands is a real market with real budgets. A musician dropping an album needs a visual world. A game studio needs promotional cinematics. A fantasy brand needs a story. Where to find clients: • Music artists on SoundCloud and Spotify releasing dark, gothic, or cinematic albums — search by genre, find artists with 1k–50k listeners who have no visual content. They have the audience and the need but no production budget for traditional video. • Indie game studios on Itch and Steam launching fantasy or horror titles — they need promotional cinematics and trailers but can't afford a production company. A single free scene built from their game's character art opens every conversation. • Dark fantasy and gothic brands on Instagram and TikTok with strong photo content but zero video presence — jewelry brands, clothing labels, occult lifestyle brands. They have the aesthetic already built. You just add motion to it. • Fantasy and horror fiction authors on Instagram and Substack launching new books — they need visual teasers, trailers, and world-building content to build pre-launch audiences. Most have no idea this kind of production is accessible at this price point. • Tabletop RPG creators and Dungeon Masters on Patreon and Kickstarter — they build entire fantasy universes and need cinematic content for campaigns, promotional videos, and subscriber rewards. The niche is underserved and the creators inside it spend consistently on content tools and services. 📥Tomorrow I'll show you what's sitting right next to this opportunity. 🔖Save this if you are looking for practical AI methods that actually pay.

Zentrix⌚️

50,098 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Tucker Carlson uses Woodstock ‘69 as a snapshot of American societal decline, arguing that even the degen stoners of the baby boomer era looked healthier, happier and better off than young Americans today "Can you imagine? 4 or 5 hundred thousand American 18 year olds plucked at random from cities across the country in a field this summer...57 years after Woodstock. Can you imagine what they would look like with their shirts off?..Can you imagine what their faces would look like?" "You know, we could make a detailed case based on the statistics...pick the biggest generation in American history, the baby boom...you know the average age at which people had babies in...1969? Women had babies in the United States on average the age of 20. How'd they do that?" "Maybe a more telling picture of what life was like in, let's just pick that same year, 1969, is an actual picture from 1969. Let's pick the biggest event that year in the United States." "The first thing you notice, what's the first thing you notice? Well, the complexion of the skin 90% white, but after that the first thing you notice is you can see the ribs on almost every single person at that event. These are thin fit people with muscle definition and not a single hint of what we call now a love handle...In fact, it's probably not even the healthiest cross-section of American society in 1969. These were the drug users of 1969. These were the party people." "And yet even the stoners in 1969 looked, well, fit, trim, and happy." "You can't look at those pictures and thousands more like them on the internet of this country before this era that we're living in now and say the people are better off. They're gravely worse off, and you can see it in their faces and in their tattoos and in their piercings and in their demeanor... So if you cared about them, you would consider that a tragedy."

Tucker Carlson uses Woodstock ‘69 as a snapshot of American societal decline, arguing that even the degen stoners of the baby boomer era looked healthier, happier and better off than young Americans today "Can you imagine? 4 or 5 hundred thousand American 18 year olds plucked at random from cities across the country in a field this summer...57 years after Woodstock. Can you imagine what they would look like with their shirts off?..Can you imagine what their faces would look like?" "You know, we could make a detailed case based on the statistics...pick the biggest generation in American history, the baby boom...you know the average age at which people had babies in...1969? Women had babies in the United States on average the age of 20. How'd they do that?" "Maybe a more telling picture of what life was like in, let's just pick that same year, 1969, is an actual picture from 1969. Let's pick the biggest event that year in the United States." "The first thing you notice, what's the first thing you notice? Well, the complexion of the skin 90% white, but after that the first thing you notice is you can see the ribs on almost every single person at that event. These are thin fit people with muscle definition and not a single hint of what we call now a love handle...In fact, it's probably not even the healthiest cross-section of American society in 1969. These were the drug users of 1969. These were the party people." "And yet even the stoners in 1969 looked, well, fit, trim, and happy." "You can't look at those pictures and thousands more like them on the internet of this country before this era that we're living in now and say the people are better off. They're gravely worse off, and you can see it in their faces and in their tattoos and in their piercings and in their demeanor... So if you cared about them, you would consider that a tragedy."

Fractured Light

24,720 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This isn't just about the 2020 stolen election, it's about the culmination of an engineered, multi-year effort to overthrow President Donald Trump and the United States government itself. From the Russia probe, the Mueller investigation, the impeachments, a stolen election, MMS slander campaigns, the never ending court battles, and multiple assassination attempts. We know that the 2020 election was stolen, but the bigger story here is that these foreign tied election companies were specifically chosen to run U.S. elections when they knew from the start that these companies and their technology were compromised. The stolen 2020 election margins were so large that it literally forced more cheating, on top of cheating in order to overcome Trump's margin of victory. This was not expected and why they got sloppy towards the end. Dominion is tied to Smartmatic which was founded in the early 2000s by Venezuelans close to dictator Hugo Chavez to literally "fix elections." Smartmatic has a history of rigging elections, a terrible record, and ties to Chavez's successor Maduro. Votes are processed in Barcelona, Spain, using foreign servers in Canada, Spain, Germany, everywhere but the United States. Why would ANY countries election results first go to another country? This is a huge red flag from the start. The executive at Smartmatic was also tied to Soros's Open Society Foundation, which is another red flag, with Soros being known for funding color revolutions in multiple countries, including the U.S. itself, implying influence from globalist interests. Dominion's lobbyist was the former chief of staff to Georgia's governor, suggesting insider deals for adoption, and one of Biden's transition team members was also tied to Smartmatic. The inside coordination is just right out in the open and in your face... To top it all off, five private firms handle 90% of U.S. election voting, with little transparency on ownership. States can't meaningfully audit votes because servers are proprietary and located abroad. This is the NUMBER 1 red flag and done on purpose to control election outcomes. This is entire situation depends on if we will no longer have a country or not because if we do not fix this now, we will never have an opportunity again. Don't waste your chance. Stand up and fight for what's right, stand up and fight for the truth.

This isn't just about the 2020 stolen election, it's about the culmination of an engineered, multi-year effort to overthrow President Donald Trump and the United States government itself. From the Russia probe, the Mueller investigation, the impeachments, a stolen election, MMS slander campaigns, the never ending court battles, and multiple assassination attempts. We know that the 2020 election was stolen, but the bigger story here is that these foreign tied election companies were specifically chosen to run U.S. elections when they knew from the start that these companies and their technology were compromised. The stolen 2020 election margins were so large that it literally forced more cheating, on top of cheating in order to overcome Trump's margin of victory. This was not expected and why they got sloppy towards the end. Dominion is tied to Smartmatic which was founded in the early 2000s by Venezuelans close to dictator Hugo Chavez to literally "fix elections." Smartmatic has a history of rigging elections, a terrible record, and ties to Chavez's successor Maduro. Votes are processed in Barcelona, Spain, using foreign servers in Canada, Spain, Germany, everywhere but the United States. Why would ANY countries election results first go to another country? This is a huge red flag from the start. The executive at Smartmatic was also tied to Soros's Open Society Foundation, which is another red flag, with Soros being known for funding color revolutions in multiple countries, including the U.S. itself, implying influence from globalist interests. Dominion's lobbyist was the former chief of staff to Georgia's governor, suggesting insider deals for adoption, and one of Biden's transition team members was also tied to Smartmatic. The inside coordination is just right out in the open and in your face... To top it all off, five private firms handle 90% of U.S. election voting, with little transparency on ownership. States can't meaningfully audit votes because servers are proprietary and located abroad. This is the NUMBER 1 red flag and done on purpose to control election outcomes. This is entire situation depends on if we will no longer have a country or not because if we do not fix this now, we will never have an opportunity again. Don't waste your chance. Stand up and fight for what's right, stand up and fight for the truth.

The SCIF

32,232 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Everyone talks about the government being weaponized but nobody talks about family court. That's where men actually lose everything. Their kids. Their money. Their dignity. And nobody cares because society decided a long time ago that dads are disposable. Andy Tank (Andy Tank). Family law attorney at Livesay & Myers, PC in Virginia. A real tough guy. Walked up to a during a custody deposition break and told him "you look like shit." Unprovoked. In a lobby full of people. Then scurried back on the record and admitted it under oath like a kid who got caught. That's the caliber of man billing you $500/hr to handle a custody case. A guy who can't keep his composure for five minutes in a hallway but somehow expects a judge to trust his judgment on where your kids should sleep at night. He doesn't respect you. He doesn't fear you. And why would he? The whole system treats men like ATMs with visitation rights. You exist to fund everyone else's lifestyle. The ex. The attorneys. The court-appointed therapists. The guardian ad litems. All of them eat because you bleed. And the second you stop being useful the court reminds you exactly where you stand. Young men aren't stupid. They see this. They see their fathers hollowed out. Their uncles bankrupted. Their brothers alienated from their own children. And they're making a rational decision. Why sign a contract where the other party can break it at any time and you lose everything? Marriage rates aren't declining because men are broken. They're declining because men are paying attention. The system doesn't need reform. It needs to be burned down and rebuilt by people who actually believe fathers matter.

Everyone talks about the government being weaponized but nobody talks about family court. That's where men actually lose everything. Their kids. Their money. Their dignity. And nobody cares because society decided a long time ago that dads are disposable. Andy Tank (Andy Tank). Family law attorney at Livesay & Myers, PC in Virginia. A real tough guy. Walked up to a during a custody deposition break and told him "you look like shit." Unprovoked. In a lobby full of people. Then scurried back on the record and admitted it under oath like a kid who got caught. That's the caliber of man billing you $500/hr to handle a custody case. A guy who can't keep his composure for five minutes in a hallway but somehow expects a judge to trust his judgment on where your kids should sleep at night. He doesn't respect you. He doesn't fear you. And why would he? The whole system treats men like ATMs with visitation rights. You exist to fund everyone else's lifestyle. The ex. The attorneys. The court-appointed therapists. The guardian ad litems. All of them eat because you bleed. And the second you stop being useful the court reminds you exactly where you stand. Young men aren't stupid. They see this. They see their fathers hollowed out. Their uncles bankrupted. Their brothers alienated from their own children. And they're making a rational decision. Why sign a contract where the other party can break it at any time and you lose everything? Marriage rates aren't declining because men are broken. They're declining because men are paying attention. The system doesn't need reform. It needs to be burned down and rebuilt by people who actually believe fathers matter.

Jacktron

48,784 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

my boy .Clavicular ran over some junkîe now everyone's crying "murd3rer" "that was too far" "he should be arrested" shut the fuck up brotha 😂 here's what actually happened: vírgin twitter mfs cut out the context this guy threw shit at clav prior to this he invaded clav's property multiple times he tried beating clav up before this event (there's proof in the video) then clav was streaming in his cybertruck this cr@ckhead jumps on windshield (allegedly has a gûn) starts screaming all on camera with his homies on the car and 3 defenceless chicks he'd prob wanna hit too clav had 2 seconds to decide: sit there and die or ran him over he ran him over lmao 3-ton cybertruck vs cr@ckhead cr@ckhead lost THE RESPONSE: woke liberals crying "murd3r" bro what? some drûg addict: - jumped on his car twice - follows him around doing shit - threatened his / friends safety wake the fuck up THE ARGUMENT: "he should've just driven away" THE GUY WAS ON HIS WINDSHIELD "he should've called cops" and risk getting shot? "violence isn't the answer" tell that to the guy harassing him THE REALITY: my client works with clav he's not some psycho not patrick bateman lmao he's a regular mf who protected himself that's it THE JUNKÎE: this wasn't some innocent person stream sniping contributing zero to society screaming at random people in the street had done multiple shit before probably pops some percs like think for a second THE VIRTUE SIGNALERS: people judging from their safe houses: "all life is sacred" okay cool you go let an cr@ckhead jump on your car see if you're still preaching peace fucking hypocrites THE LEGAL REALITY: person threatens your safety you defend yourself it's called america that's LEGAL that's COMMON SENSE that's SURVIVAL the gun was real the threat was real the danger was real this response was justified THE WOKE TEARS: everyone crying is the same people who: - never been in danger - never had gûn pointed at them - live in safe suburbs - virtue signal for internet points easy to judge from your mom’s basement fucking incels THE CHOICE: in that moment: morality doesn't matter philosophy doesn't matter opinions don't matter that was a threat he fucked around and found out play stupid games win stupid prizes THE SUPPORT: anyone hating on clav has never been in that position you’re virtue signaling on twitter my bro the dude just defended his LIFE against a possibly ARMED THREAT if you can't understand that you're living in fantasy land THE CONCLUSION: my boy did what he had to end of story there if you disagree: shut the fuck up you're coping you're woke let your survival instinct speak louder than your marxist ideals or in a more simplistic language: wake tf up kurwa

my boy .Clavicular ran over some junkîe now everyone's crying "murd3rer" "that was too far" "he should be arrested" shut the fuck up brotha 😂 here's what actually happened: vírgin twitter mfs cut out the context this guy threw shit at clav prior to this he invaded clav's property multiple times he tried beating clav up before this event (there's proof in the video) then clav was streaming in his cybertruck this cr@ckhead jumps on windshield (allegedly has a gûn) starts screaming all on camera with his homies on the car and 3 defenceless chicks he'd prob wanna hit too clav had 2 seconds to decide: sit there and die or ran him over he ran him over lmao 3-ton cybertruck vs cr@ckhead cr@ckhead lost THE RESPONSE: woke liberals crying "murd3r" bro what? some drûg addict: - jumped on his car twice - follows him around doing shit - threatened his / friends safety wake the fuck up THE ARGUMENT: "he should've just driven away" THE GUY WAS ON HIS WINDSHIELD "he should've called cops" and risk getting shot? "violence isn't the answer" tell that to the guy harassing him THE REALITY: my client works with clav he's not some psycho not patrick bateman lmao he's a regular mf who protected himself that's it THE JUNKÎE: this wasn't some innocent person stream sniping contributing zero to society screaming at random people in the street had done multiple shit before probably pops some percs like think for a second THE VIRTUE SIGNALERS: people judging from their safe houses: "all life is sacred" okay cool you go let an cr@ckhead jump on your car see if you're still preaching peace fucking hypocrites THE LEGAL REALITY: person threatens your safety you defend yourself it's called america that's LEGAL that's COMMON SENSE that's SURVIVAL the gun was real the threat was real the danger was real this response was justified THE WOKE TEARS: everyone crying is the same people who: - never been in danger - never had gûn pointed at them - live in safe suburbs - virtue signal for internet points easy to judge from your mom’s basement fucking incels THE CHOICE: in that moment: morality doesn't matter philosophy doesn't matter opinions don't matter that was a threat he fucked around and found out play stupid games win stupid prizes THE SUPPORT: anyone hating on clav has never been in that position you’re virtue signaling on twitter my bro the dude just defended his LIFE against a possibly ARMED THREAT if you can't understand that you're living in fantasy land THE CONCLUSION: my boy did what he had to end of story there if you disagree: shut the fuck up you're coping you're woke let your survival instinct speak louder than your marxist ideals or in a more simplistic language: wake tf up kurwa

Adrian Solarz

381,918 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

As I promised yesterday, I'll briefly explain LoRA training and share a workflow I made so you can do it quickly. First, let me answer a very common question: 'Why train LoRAs when we have such advanced models?' Even though we have incredibly advanced models now (like NBP), we still can't always get them to do specific things we want. Simplest example: the spritesheet LoRA I made the other day. I generated 1000 images with Nano Banana and only 100 were what I wanted. The LoRA I trained using those 100 images gives me nearly 100% consistent results. Second point is cost and speed. With LoRA, we can cut costs by 4-5x. And while doing that, we're generating 4-5x faster. How many images do you need for a good LoRA? This depends on your LoRA's complexity. For example, when I training the spritesheet LoRA, even though I used 100 images, I didn't include buildings in the training data, so this LoRA doesn't work for buildings. So think about your LoRA's use cases and add examples for as many use cases as possible to improve quality. What are paired images and how to train LoRAs for image-editing? When training LoRAs for image editing on fal, we call each edit example paired images - one with _start suffix, one with _end suffix. For example, if you're training a background remove LoRA, the unedited original photo will be your '_start' image. The image with background removed will be the '_end' image. Simply put: images we want to edit or use as reference get _start, target images we want to achieve get '_end'. Important: save both images with the same name. Like image332_start.jpg and image332_end.jpg. This way the system knows which images pair together. What about training LoRAs for models with multiple image inputs? Same logic. We still use _start and _end suffixes, but with one difference. Since there are multiple input images, we can number them: _start, _start1, _start2. Example: start images, 1st image = Woman portrait (image35_start.jpg) 2nd image = Glasses photo (image35_start1.jpg) 3rd image = Hat photo (image35_start2.jpg) Output image = portrait of woman wearing glasses and hat (image35_end.jpg) Can we do more detailed captioning? Yes. Similarly, you can improve training quality by creating a txt file for each set with the caption inside. Example: create image35.txt and write: 'Recreate the image by putting the glasses from the second image and the hat from the third image on the woman in the first image.' What are Steps? How many should I use? What's Learning Rate? Steps determines how many times the model sees and processes your training data (your images). Each step, the model learns a bit more. But as steps increase, so does the risk of overfitting. So there's no real default. But for a simpler LoRA with 20 paired images, 1000 steps is ideal. Here's a metaphor for the Steps and Learning Rate relationship: Imagine you have a balloon. Our goal is to inflate it to the optimal size. Steps = How many times we blow into the balloon Learning rate = How hard we blow each time If we blow too softly, we need to blow many more times. If we blow too hard, we risk popping it quickly and can't reach optimal size. Of course training won't explode, but it won't work as intended because it wasn't trained optimally. Training's done, now what? Once training's complete, you'll have a safetensors file. Every model you train on fal has a LoRA inference endpoint. In that inference, add your safetensors file link to the LoRA url input, and you can use your LoRA. Thanks for the read! The workflow in the video: If I forgot anything, let me know in the replies.

As I promised yesterday, I'll briefly explain LoRA training and share a workflow I made so you can do it quickly. First, let me answer a very common question: 'Why train LoRAs when we have such advanced models?' Even though we have incredibly advanced models now (like NBP), we still can't always get them to do specific things we want. Simplest example: the spritesheet LoRA I made the other day. I generated 1000 images with Nano Banana and only 100 were what I wanted. The LoRA I trained using those 100 images gives me nearly 100% consistent results. Second point is cost and speed. With LoRA, we can cut costs by 4-5x. And while doing that, we're generating 4-5x faster. How many images do you need for a good LoRA? This depends on your LoRA's complexity. For example, when I training the spritesheet LoRA, even though I used 100 images, I didn't include buildings in the training data, so this LoRA doesn't work for buildings. So think about your LoRA's use cases and add examples for as many use cases as possible to improve quality. What are paired images and how to train LoRAs for image-editing? When training LoRAs for image editing on fal, we call each edit example paired images - one with _start suffix, one with _end suffix. For example, if you're training a background remove LoRA, the unedited original photo will be your '_start' image. The image with background removed will be the '_end' image. Simply put: images we want to edit or use as reference get _start, target images we want to achieve get '_end'. Important: save both images with the same name. Like image332_start.jpg and image332_end.jpg. This way the system knows which images pair together. What about training LoRAs for models with multiple image inputs? Same logic. We still use _start and _end suffixes, but with one difference. Since there are multiple input images, we can number them: _start, _start1, _start2. Example: start images, 1st image = Woman portrait (image35_start.jpg) 2nd image = Glasses photo (image35_start1.jpg) 3rd image = Hat photo (image35_start2.jpg) Output image = portrait of woman wearing glasses and hat (image35_end.jpg) Can we do more detailed captioning? Yes. Similarly, you can improve training quality by creating a txt file for each set with the caption inside. Example: create image35.txt and write: 'Recreate the image by putting the glasses from the second image and the hat from the third image on the woman in the first image.' What are Steps? How many should I use? What's Learning Rate? Steps determines how many times the model sees and processes your training data (your images). Each step, the model learns a bit more. But as steps increase, so does the risk of overfitting. So there's no real default. But for a simpler LoRA with 20 paired images, 1000 steps is ideal. Here's a metaphor for the Steps and Learning Rate relationship: Imagine you have a balloon. Our goal is to inflate it to the optimal size. Steps = How many times we blow into the balloon Learning rate = How hard we blow each time If we blow too softly, we need to blow many more times. If we blow too hard, we risk popping it quickly and can't reach optimal size. Of course training won't explode, but it won't work as intended because it wasn't trained optimally. Training's done, now what? Once training's complete, you'll have a safetensors file. Every model you train on fal has a LoRA inference endpoint. In that inference, add your safetensors file link to the LoRA url input, and you can use your LoRA. Thanks for the read! The workflow in the video: If I forgot anything, let me know in the replies.

ilker

15,192 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Anthropic might be the biggest hypocrite in tech history. They built their entire brand on one promise: We are the responsible ones. We will not let this technology get out of control. That promise just exploded in public. Last week, a security lapse exposed nearly 3,000 internal files to anyone with an internet connection. Inside those files was a draft blog post about their upcoming model called "Mythos" that contained one of the most alarming sentences any AI company has ever written: "Mythos is currently far ahead of any other AI model in cyber capabilities and poses unprecedented cybersecurity risks." Their own words. About their own product. Leaked because someone forgot to secure a public data store. Cybersecurity stocks crashed the next day. Then THREE DAYS LATER it happened again. Anthropic leaked 500,000 lines of Claude Code source code through a packaging error on GitHub. Claude Code is their most popular product. The code exposed how the tool handles permissions, agent coordination, and internal feature pipelines. Competitors can reverse-engineer it. Hackers can study it for vulnerabilities. The company that tells the world it builds the safest AI can't even keep its own code off the public internet. But wait. It gets worse... Their head of Claude Code had JUST bragged publicly that "pretty much 100 percent" of the company's code is now AI generated. He personally hadn't made a single edit by hand in over two months. So the company whose entire pitch is "trust us with the most powerful technology ever created" is writing 100% of its code with AI and then accidentally publishing it for the world to see. Meanwhile the models they're already shipping are being used for actual cyberattacks RIGHT NOW. In November, Anthropic admitted that a Chinese state-sponsored hacking group used Claude to attack roughly 30 global targets including banks and government agencies. A hacker asked Claude in russian to build a web panel for managing hundreds of attack targets. In February, another hacker used Claude to breach Mexican government agencies and steal sensitive tax and voter information. Their response to all of this? They quietly rolled back their own safety pledge. In late February, Anthropic removed its commitment to halt model development if capabilities outpace safety procedures. The new policy is that they'll grade themselves on "nonbinding but publicly declared" goals. Translation: We used to promise we'd stop if things got dangerous. Now we promise we'll think about it. A congressman sent Anthropic a letter this week asking what the hell is going on. Anthropic hasn't answered. And here's the part that makes all of this actually matter: Anthropic is planning an IPO. They need to convince investors they're a trustworthy, well-run company that can handle the most sensitive technology on the planet. In the last 10 days they leaked their most powerful model's existence by accident, leaked their most popular product's source code by accident, got banned from the entire US government, had the DOJ appeal to restore that ban, told a court they could lose billions from the fallout, and weakened the ONE safety policy that made them different from every other AI lab. The "safe AI company" narrative was always a marketing play. Every AI lab says they care about safety. Anthropic just said it louder. But when your own internal documents admit your next model poses "unprecedented cybersecurity risks" and you can't even keep those documents from leaking to the public internet, the gap between the marketing and the reality becomes impossible to ignore. Anthropic isn't the safest AI company. They're the AI company that figured out that SAYING you're the safest is worth billions in valuation. Until it isn't.

Ricardo

16,245 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

When did a trip to the nail salon change from a relaxing escape into an impromptu episode of amateur reality TV? It seems the concept of basic public decorum has officially left the building, replaced instead by the loud, unfiltered tantrums of individuals who genuinely believe the universe revolves around their personal schedules. In this latest display of unbridled entitlement, a customer decides that the best way to handle a business conflict is to shout over the staff, demand immediate service because she has a flight to catch, and threaten to call the police over what amounts to a scheduling dispute. Sometimes, being a bystander requires breaking the silence—not to add to the chaos, but to firmly and respectfully inject a dose of reality back into the room. The scene plays out with a predictable, yet exhausting, script. A customer, settled into a pedicure chair in Arlington, Virginia, becomes increasingly agitated while confronting a salon employee. When the employee calmly explains the situation, the customer ramps up the intensity, questioning the worker's English comprehension before escalating into full-blown shouting. "I came in at 5:30! I made the appointment to do my nails! I have to do my nails or I'm going to call the cops!" Let’s unpack the sheer absurdity of threatening law enforcement because a nail appointment isn't going exactly as planned. Emergency services exist for actual emergencies, not to act as personal managers for a scheduling mishap. Using the threat of police intervention as a weapon over a beauty service isn't just a misuse of resources; it’s a glaring reflection of a deep-seated privilege that assumes the rules of civil society simply don't apply. What makes these situations truly difficult for service workers is the power imbalance. Staff members are often bound by company policy to remain polite, professional, and composed, even when dealing with abusive behavior. They cannot match the volume or the aggression without risking their livelihood. That is exactly why the intervention from the woman recording the video is so necessary: Calling Out the Disturbance: By explicitly stating, "You are literally disturbing the whole salon," she shifts the focus from the customer's internal drama to the collective experience of everyone else in the room. Demanding Respect: Reminding an adult that they need to have "some decency and be a little bit more respectful" isn't about starting a fight; it’s about drawing a hard line against unacceptable behavior. Restoring Balance: When bystanders speak up calmly and directly, it strips the "Karen" of her perceived audience and support, effectively neutralizing the tantrum. There is a distinct difference between standing up for yourself as a consumer and throwing a childish fit because things aren't going your way. An adult understands that delays happen, miscommunications occur, and flights require proper time management that doesn't rely on a salon working at lightning speed to fix a personal timeline. Acting like an entitled princess and shouting down workers who are just trying to do their jobs doesn't get results quicker; it just alienates everyone around you. A place of business is a shared space, and a little humility, patience, and mutual respect go a long way. If you can't manage that, maybe it's best to handle your appointments—and your tantrums—at home.

When did a trip to the nail salon change from a relaxing escape into an impromptu episode of amateur reality TV? It seems the concept of basic public decorum has officially left the building, replaced instead by the loud, unfiltered tantrums of individuals who genuinely believe the universe revolves around their personal schedules. In this latest display of unbridled entitlement, a customer decides that the best way to handle a business conflict is to shout over the staff, demand immediate service because she has a flight to catch, and threaten to call the police over what amounts to a scheduling dispute. Sometimes, being a bystander requires breaking the silence—not to add to the chaos, but to firmly and respectfully inject a dose of reality back into the room. The scene plays out with a predictable, yet exhausting, script. A customer, settled into a pedicure chair in Arlington, Virginia, becomes increasingly agitated while confronting a salon employee. When the employee calmly explains the situation, the customer ramps up the intensity, questioning the worker's English comprehension before escalating into full-blown shouting. "I came in at 5:30! I made the appointment to do my nails! I have to do my nails or I'm going to call the cops!" Let’s unpack the sheer absurdity of threatening law enforcement because a nail appointment isn't going exactly as planned. Emergency services exist for actual emergencies, not to act as personal managers for a scheduling mishap. Using the threat of police intervention as a weapon over a beauty service isn't just a misuse of resources; it’s a glaring reflection of a deep-seated privilege that assumes the rules of civil society simply don't apply. What makes these situations truly difficult for service workers is the power imbalance. Staff members are often bound by company policy to remain polite, professional, and composed, even when dealing with abusive behavior. They cannot match the volume or the aggression without risking their livelihood. That is exactly why the intervention from the woman recording the video is so necessary: Calling Out the Disturbance: By explicitly stating, "You are literally disturbing the whole salon," she shifts the focus from the customer's internal drama to the collective experience of everyone else in the room. Demanding Respect: Reminding an adult that they need to have "some decency and be a little bit more respectful" isn't about starting a fight; it’s about drawing a hard line against unacceptable behavior. Restoring Balance: When bystanders speak up calmly and directly, it strips the "Karen" of her perceived audience and support, effectively neutralizing the tantrum. There is a distinct difference between standing up for yourself as a consumer and throwing a childish fit because things aren't going your way. An adult understands that delays happen, miscommunications occur, and flights require proper time management that doesn't rely on a salon working at lightning speed to fix a personal timeline. Acting like an entitled princess and shouting down workers who are just trying to do their jobs doesn't get results quicker; it just alienates everyone around you. A place of business is a shared space, and a little humility, patience, and mutual respect go a long way. If you can't manage that, maybe it's best to handle your appointments—and your tantrums—at home.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

24,856 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Holy shit... the gap between what AI video tools promise and what they actually hand back just got a lot smaller. Normally, using AI for video feels like a gamble: you type in a prompt, wait three minutes, and it spits back a locked MP4. If one single specs number on screen is wrong, you can't edit it—you just have to re-prompt, re-render, and burn through your credits again. To see if any tool could actually handle a real commercial asset without the usual headache, I ran a quick test. I took a concept photo of an "iPhone Duo" and asked Fotor’s Fotor Agent to build an Apple-style product reveal—no 3D modeling, no physical camera setup, and no hiring a motion designer. It didn't just render a clip. It handed me an actual multi-track project file in about 40 minutes. A few things genuinely surprised me about the workflow: 1. It built a real timeline (and did its own research) I uploaded the concept shot and asked for a reveal with animated specs. I didn't even feed it detailed technical specs—it actually went online, pulled plausible data, and mapped it out. I cross-checked against Apple’s actual site later and the formatting and spec logic were spot-on. Instead of a flat video, it laid out the clips, music, transitions, and motion graphics onto separate editable tracks. 2. Native 4K Motion Graphics for a few cents a second Getting clean, keyframed motion graphics usually means opening After Effects or paying someone a few thousand bucks to build them. Fotor Agent generated sharp, native 4K spec cards and charts right on the timeline. The cost broke down to just a few cents per second, which makes testing complex visual ideas almost risk-free. 3. You can fix mistakes without re-rendering everything This was the most practical part. When I wanted to shorten a piece of copy on one of the spec cards, I didn't have to generate a new video or burn more credits. I just clicked the text layer directly on the timeline, edited it, and the preview updated instantly. The actual breakdown: Time: 3–5 days of AE keyframing → ~40 minutes Cost: Thousands in agency quotes → A few dollars in credits Workflow: Jumping between 5 different apps → Done in one Agent AI shouldn't just dump a locked video file on your desktop and call it a day. Fotor Agent handles the heavy production setup while leaving you with an actual project file you can tweak and refine. Screen recording and the 4K test clip are attached below! 👇🏼

Holy shit... the gap between what AI video tools promise and what they actually hand back just got a lot smaller. Normally, using AI for video feels like a gamble: you type in a prompt, wait three minutes, and it spits back a locked MP4. If one single specs number on screen is wrong, you can't edit it—you just have to re-prompt, re-render, and burn through your credits again. To see if any tool could actually handle a real commercial asset without the usual headache, I ran a quick test. I took a concept photo of an "iPhone Duo" and asked Fotor’s Fotor Agent to build an Apple-style product reveal—no 3D modeling, no physical camera setup, and no hiring a motion designer. It didn't just render a clip. It handed me an actual multi-track project file in about 40 minutes. A few things genuinely surprised me about the workflow: 1. It built a real timeline (and did its own research) I uploaded the concept shot and asked for a reveal with animated specs. I didn't even feed it detailed technical specs—it actually went online, pulled plausible data, and mapped it out. I cross-checked against Apple’s actual site later and the formatting and spec logic were spot-on. Instead of a flat video, it laid out the clips, music, transitions, and motion graphics onto separate editable tracks. 2. Native 4K Motion Graphics for a few cents a second Getting clean, keyframed motion graphics usually means opening After Effects or paying someone a few thousand bucks to build them. Fotor Agent generated sharp, native 4K spec cards and charts right on the timeline. The cost broke down to just a few cents per second, which makes testing complex visual ideas almost risk-free. 3. You can fix mistakes without re-rendering everything This was the most practical part. When I wanted to shorten a piece of copy on one of the spec cards, I didn't have to generate a new video or burn more credits. I just clicked the text layer directly on the timeline, edited it, and the preview updated instantly. The actual breakdown: Time: 3–5 days of AE keyframing → ~40 minutes Cost: Thousands in agency quotes → A few dollars in credits Workflow: Jumping between 5 different apps → Done in one Agent AI shouldn't just dump a locked video file on your desktop and call it a day. Fotor Agent handles the heavy production setup while leaving you with an actual project file you can tweak and refine. Screen recording and the 4K test clip are attached below! 👇🏼

marcus

45,368 görüntüleme • 4 gün önce