Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

SOL staking could evolve from passive yield into a claim on real network revenue Mert highlights a key part of the Solana staking thesis: stakers can benefit from economic activity happening directly on the network. “Not only are you getting protected from issuance, you’re getting additional real productive yield...

21,626 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 13

Фото профиля mert
mert2 месяцев назад

stake with helius and use solana

Фото профиля Kaiz 🐂🀄️
Kaiz 🐂🀄️2 месяцев назад

Solana summer 🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля Kaiz 🐂🀄️
Kaiz 🐂🀄️2 месяцев назад

ft: @mert, @paulbarrontv

Фото профиля MORI⚡️
MORI⚡️2 месяцев назад

thats the part of solana staking people overlook real network revenue changes everything for holders

Фото профиля Unclearfatez
Unclearfatez2 месяцев назад

Thats not real mert. The real @mert dont have hair

Фото профиля Honeycomb
Honeycomb2 месяцев назад

@mert Stake and stack your solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112

Фото профиля Fablo
Fablo2 месяцев назад

more activity more fees, got it

Фото профиля Crypto Sapiens
Crypto Sapiens2 месяцев назад

that actually makes sense yeah

Фото профиля Adel Bucetta
Adel Bucetta2 месяцев назад

that's the beauty of solana's design: the more usage, the more revenue for stakers, but it's not just about yield it's a claim on the entire value chain

Фото профиля Hubra | Solana staking
Hubra | Solana staking2 месяцев назад

This is why validator choice starts to matter more than the headline APY. Fee and MEV capture varies a lot between operators, and that spread is what actually lands in a staker's account.

Фото профиля Wolfgang
Wolfgang2 месяцев назад

got it, will follow the instructions strictly now

Фото профиля JPool
JPool2 месяцев назад

Yes, exactly this. Working on it.

Фото профиля MCF
MCF2 месяцев назад

Right?

Похожие видео

OLY | Who Pays for Yield? Yield numbers are easy to advertise. Understanding where that money comes from takes a little more work. Whenever I look at a DeFi protocol, that's where I start. I went through OLY revenue structure on Ethereum, and its flywheel gives us a few things worth examining. - Following Revenue Sources OLY combines several income mechanisms: • ETH collected through sell taxes • ETH staking rewards through Lido stETH • Liquidity fees earned from Uniswap pools Each has a different source. Staking rewards come from Ethereum's validation system. Liquidity fees depend on trading activity, while transaction taxes are paid by market participants. None of these income streams is fixed or guaranteed. - Revenue and Token Inflation One detail worth pointing out is OLY Inflation, which also appears in its flywheel. Protocol inflation can increase treasury token holdings, but newly issued tokens aren't equivalent to revenue earned from staking or trading fees. I think separating these sources matters when evaluating any DeFi model. More incentives don't automatically mean more economic activity. - What Happens as OLY Expands? OLY is already extending its liquidity model into Robinhood Chain, including markets involving tokenized stocks. Bank of OLY is also being prepared as an onchain DeFi initiative, not a licensed bank. It will operate with OLY rather than introducing another token. I'm interested in seeing how staking, liquidity fees and transaction activity develop as this ecosystem grows. Revenue matters, but understanding its source matters even more. More details from OLY:

Arjantit

25,968 просмотров • 12 дней назад