Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Some 2pussy-1dick scenes use "squirt synchronization"—when both women orgasm simultaneously, the dick gets drenched in twin juices. 🌊😈 #TrendingNow #SexEd #Hardcore #WetDreams #DirtyTruth

🔞 Yashi (18+)

25,961 subscribers

19,350 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

NSFW #TrendingNow #SexEd #Hardcore #WetDreams #DirtyTruth

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

$Dr. Karl Jablonowski just revealed two major issues with Hep B vaccination that pro-vaccine advocates “NEVER mention.” “One is the adverse events that manifest from autoimmune issues related to the vaccine like Guillain-Barré syndrome.” “The other is aluminum, which is in both of the available infant vaccines.” “Aluminum is the third-most abundant element on Earth, and yet not a single animal makes use of it as a biological function.” “Because it’s a neurotoxin.” “When you inject a baby with aluminum, some fraction of it is going to go into the brain.” “Once aluminum gets into the brain, there is no easy way out.” “A neurotoxin incompatible with life stuck in the brain of a developing infant is a horrible recipe for their lives and for society.”$

Dr. Karl Jablonowski just revealed two major issues with Hep B vaccination that pro-vaccine advocates “NEVER mention.” “One is the adverse events that manifest from autoimmune issues related to the vaccine like Guillain-Barré syndrome.” “The other is aluminum, which is in both of the available infant vaccines.” “Aluminum is the third-most abundant element on Earth, and yet not a single animal makes use of it as a biological function.” “Because it’s a neurotoxin.” “When you inject a baby with aluminum, some fraction of it is going to go into the brain.” “Once aluminum gets into the brain, there is no easy way out.” “A neurotoxin incompatible with life stuck in the brain of a developing infant is a horrible recipe for their lives and for society.”

Children’s Health Defense

19,576 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Gaspar Noé on Uli Edel's 'Christiane F.' (1981): "We had some film references also in mind when we shot 'Climax' (2018). Like the most unexpected one, probably, is 'Christiane F.' (1981). I re-watched it for the eighth time lately, and it’s a big melodrama, very, very hardcore, with young kids doing drugs and coming to prost!tute themselves to save their love story, but what amazed me when I re-watched the movie was how colourful the movie was, and how well-dressed the characters were. It’s very joyful in terms of colour, in terms of music. The movie is totally dark, and it’s dirty. So I asked both my cinematographer, my production designer – who was repainting all the locations – and my stylist, to be as colourful as they could be, but with scenes that would always look dirty. (...) Really what I liked about 'Christiane F'. was that it was so respectful to every single one of its characters – the movie was, and the director was." (Gaspar Noé's interview with Ben Mortimer, Den of Geek, 2018) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "Christiane F" (1981) was released in the USA.

Gaspar Noé on Uli Edel's 'Christiane F.' (1981): "We had some film references also in mind when we shot 'Climax' (2018). Like the most unexpected one, probably, is 'Christiane F.' (1981). I re-watched it for the eighth time lately, and it’s a big melodrama, very, very hardcore, with young kids doing drugs and coming to prost!tute themselves to save their love story, but what amazed me when I re-watched the movie was how colourful the movie was, and how well-dressed the characters were. It’s very joyful in terms of colour, in terms of music. The movie is totally dark, and it’s dirty. So I asked both my cinematographer, my production designer – who was repainting all the locations – and my stylist, to be as colourful as they could be, but with scenes that would always look dirty. (...) Really what I liked about 'Christiane F'. was that it was so respectful to every single one of its characters – the movie was, and the director was." (Gaspar Noé's interview with Ben Mortimer, Den of Geek, 2018) P.S: On this day, 45 years ago, "Christiane F" (1981) was released in the USA.

DepressedBergman

111,366 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The truth is that many men are naturally timid and fearful. Social media algorithms reward crazy, sensational, outrageous videos. So when you see these clips, and I’m sure both of you have seen them, of some girl doing squats at the gym while recording herself, with a caption underneath like, “Oh my God, some creep just looked at me,” guys watch that and think, “Oh, girls don’t even want to be looked at in public.” So they go into this mode of eyes forward, blinkers on, don’t look at anyone, don’t make any woman think you might be interested in her. But most women at the gym are probably either indifferent to being noticed, or, if they’re single, maybe even positively inclined to being approached in a normal, respectful way. The problem is that men see the video and think that is reality. They get this distorted view of what women are actually like in public. The other thing is that a lot of guys use Me Too, or these videos of women posting mean comments about men, as a justification for what pickup artists call approach anxiety. They’re already afraid of approaching women. Now they have a socially acceptable excuse. “Oh, I don’t want to be accused of harassment.” “I would totally go talk to her, bro, but I don’t want to get Me Too’d.” “I would approach that girl, but what if she records me and posts it online?” That becomes the story they tell themselves. But the truth is, they probably wouldn’t approach her anyway. They would be afraid regardless. So I think there’s a lot of excuse-making mixed in with genuine fear.

The truth is that many men are naturally timid and fearful. Social media algorithms reward crazy, sensational, outrageous videos. So when you see these clips, and I’m sure both of you have seen them, of some girl doing squats at the gym while recording herself, with a caption underneath like, “Oh my God, some creep just looked at me,” guys watch that and think, “Oh, girls don’t even want to be looked at in public.” So they go into this mode of eyes forward, blinkers on, don’t look at anyone, don’t make any woman think you might be interested in her. But most women at the gym are probably either indifferent to being noticed, or, if they’re single, maybe even positively inclined to being approached in a normal, respectful way. The problem is that men see the video and think that is reality. They get this distorted view of what women are actually like in public. The other thing is that a lot of guys use Me Too, or these videos of women posting mean comments about men, as a justification for what pickup artists call approach anxiety. They’re already afraid of approaching women. Now they have a socially acceptable excuse. “Oh, I don’t want to be accused of harassment.” “I would totally go talk to her, bro, but I don’t want to get Me Too’d.” “I would approach that girl, but what if she records me and posts it online?” That becomes the story they tell themselves. But the truth is, they probably wouldn’t approach her anyway. They would be afraid regardless. So I think there’s a lot of excuse-making mixed in with genuine fear.

Rob Henderson

28,757 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

ACTOR JAMES FRANCO 2319 👀 ”SOME SERIOUS STUFF GOING ON” LOOK AT TSHIRT WHAT DOES IT SAY 👀 Monsters, Inc. Fans expressing disbelief that they never noticed it before. The scene in question features the use of the code ’23-19,’ which prompts an emergency response from the Child Detection Agency (CDA) after a monster returns from the human world with a sock stuck to his back. The scene in question features the character George Sanderson being dramatically tackled and shaved by the CDA after his contamination with a ‘foreign object’ – a harmless white sock. The phrase ‘We have a 23-19!’ is shouted by one of his fellow monsters, sparking a chaotic and humorous sequence. “The 23rd letter in the alphabet is W, and the 19th letter is S. Standing for white socks. Yep.” “’23-19′ is in all Pixar movies because it’s the studio number that the producers start off in.” “It’s also the code for copyright infringement law and hidden in lots of movies that have broken it.” Per IGV News The Scandal That Chased James Franco Out Of Hollywood James Franco was at the height of his Hollywood trajectory when, in 2018, he was accused of sexual misconduct by five women, four of whom attended his now-closed acting school, Studio 4, which was launched in 2014. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Sarah Tither-Kaplan, one of the accusers, claimed that she and the other victims would give in to Franco's requests as they believed it would benefit their careers in the long run. "I feel there was an abuse of power, and there was a culture of exploiting non-celebrity women, and a culture of women being replaceable," she opined. The shocking allegations came at the height of the Me Too movement when numerous women in Hollywood, and all over the world, began raising awareness about sexual harassment and abuse in the entertainment industry and beyond. Therefore, the claims against the "General Hospital" alum cost Franco movie roles and even a decades-long friendship with collaborator Seth Rogen. James Franco discussed the sexual misconduct allegations made against him. Referring to the decision to call one of his acting school classes "Sex Scenes," the "Disaster Artist" star admitted that using that title was a stupid decision. Franco also acknowledged having romantic relationships with certain pupils, but clarified, "I didn't sleep with anybody in that particular class, but over the course of my teaching, I did sleep with students and that was wrong." During a 2018 episode of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Franco strongly denied the sexual misconduct allegations. But, in October 2020, the women filed a lawsuit against Franco and two other men — one of whom co-owned the acting school with the "Freaks and Geeks" star — stating that the students were defrauded by Studio 4 and that they were constantly forced to perform sex scenes on camera. The matter was settled in 2021 when Franco and his fellow accused associates agreed to settle for $2.2 million.

ACTOR JAMES FRANCO 2319 👀 ”SOME SERIOUS STUFF GOING ON” LOOK AT TSHIRT WHAT DOES IT SAY 👀 Monsters, Inc. Fans expressing disbelief that they never noticed it before. The scene in question features the use of the code ’23-19,’ which prompts an emergency response from the Child Detection Agency (CDA) after a monster returns from the human world with a sock stuck to his back. The scene in question features the character George Sanderson being dramatically tackled and shaved by the CDA after his contamination with a ‘foreign object’ – a harmless white sock. The phrase ‘We have a 23-19!’ is shouted by one of his fellow monsters, sparking a chaotic and humorous sequence. “The 23rd letter in the alphabet is W, and the 19th letter is S. Standing for white socks. Yep.” “’23-19′ is in all Pixar movies because it’s the studio number that the producers start off in.” “It’s also the code for copyright infringement law and hidden in lots of movies that have broken it.” Per IGV News The Scandal That Chased James Franco Out Of Hollywood James Franco was at the height of his Hollywood trajectory when, in 2018, he was accused of sexual misconduct by five women, four of whom attended his now-closed acting school, Studio 4, which was launched in 2014. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Sarah Tither-Kaplan, one of the accusers, claimed that she and the other victims would give in to Franco's requests as they believed it would benefit their careers in the long run. "I feel there was an abuse of power, and there was a culture of exploiting non-celebrity women, and a culture of women being replaceable," she opined. The shocking allegations came at the height of the Me Too movement when numerous women in Hollywood, and all over the world, began raising awareness about sexual harassment and abuse in the entertainment industry and beyond. Therefore, the claims against the "General Hospital" alum cost Franco movie roles and even a decades-long friendship with collaborator Seth Rogen. James Franco discussed the sexual misconduct allegations made against him. Referring to the decision to call one of his acting school classes "Sex Scenes," the "Disaster Artist" star admitted that using that title was a stupid decision. Franco also acknowledged having romantic relationships with certain pupils, but clarified, "I didn't sleep with anybody in that particular class, but over the course of my teaching, I did sleep with students and that was wrong." During a 2018 episode of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Franco strongly denied the sexual misconduct allegations. But, in October 2020, the women filed a lawsuit against Franco and two other men — one of whom co-owned the acting school with the "Freaks and Geeks" star — stating that the students were defrauded by Studio 4 and that they were constantly forced to perform sex scenes on camera. The matter was settled in 2021 when Franco and his fellow accused associates agreed to settle for $2.2 million.

SANTINO

1,851,068 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

ACTOR JAMES FRANCO 2319 👀 ”SOME SERIOUS STUFF GOING ON” LOOK AT TSHIRT WHAT DOES IT SAY 👀 Monsters, Inc. Fans expressing disbelief that they never noticed it before. The scene in question features the use of the code ’23-19,’ which prompts an emergency response from the Child Detection Agency (CDA) after a monster returns from the human world with a sock stuck to his back. The scene in question features the character George Sanderson being dramatically tackled and shaved by the CDA after his contamination with a ‘foreign object’ – a harmless white sock. The phrase ‘We have a 23-19!’ is shouted by one of his fellow monsters, sparking a chaotic and humorous sequence. “The 23rd letter in the alphabet is W, and the 19th letter is S. Standing for white socks. Yep.” “’23-19′ is in all Pixar movies because it’s the studio number that the producers start off in.” “It’s also the code for copyright infringement law and hidden in lots of movies that have broken it.” Per IGV News The Scandal That Chased James Franco Out Of Hollywood James Franco was at the height of his Hollywood trajectory when, in 2018, he was accused of sexual misconduct by five women, four of whom attended his now-closed acting school, Studio 4, which was launched in 2014. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Sarah Tither-Kaplan, one of the accusers, claimed that she and the other victims would give in to Franco's requests as they believed it would benefit their careers in the long run. "I feel there was an abuse of power, and there was a culture of exploiting non-celebrity women, and a culture of women being replaceable," she opined. The shocking allegations came at the height of the Me Too movement when numerous women in Hollywood, and all over the world, began raising awareness about sexual harassment and abuse in the entertainment industry and beyond. Therefore, the claims against the "General Hospital" alum cost Franco movie roles and even a decades-long friendship with collaborator Seth Rogen. James Franco discussed the sexual misconduct allegations made against him. Referring to the decision to call one of his acting school classes "Sex Scenes," the "Disaster Artist" star admitted that using that title was a stupid decision. Franco also acknowledged having romantic relationships with certain pupils, but clarified, "I didn't sleep with anybody in that particular class, but over the course of my teaching, I did sleep with students and that was wrong." During a 2018 episode of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Franco strongly denied the sexual misconduct allegations. But, in October 2020, the women filed a lawsuit against Franco and two other men — one of whom co-owned the acting school with the "Freaks and Geeks" star — stating that the students were defrauded by Studio 4 and that they were constantly forced to perform sex scenes on camera. The matter was settled in 2021 when Franco and his fellow accused associates agreed to settle for $2.2 million.

ACTOR JAMES FRANCO 2319 👀 ”SOME SERIOUS STUFF GOING ON” LOOK AT TSHIRT WHAT DOES IT SAY 👀 Monsters, Inc. Fans expressing disbelief that they never noticed it before. The scene in question features the use of the code ’23-19,’ which prompts an emergency response from the Child Detection Agency (CDA) after a monster returns from the human world with a sock stuck to his back. The scene in question features the character George Sanderson being dramatically tackled and shaved by the CDA after his contamination with a ‘foreign object’ – a harmless white sock. The phrase ‘We have a 23-19!’ is shouted by one of his fellow monsters, sparking a chaotic and humorous sequence. “The 23rd letter in the alphabet is W, and the 19th letter is S. Standing for white socks. Yep.” “’23-19′ is in all Pixar movies because it’s the studio number that the producers start off in.” “It’s also the code for copyright infringement law and hidden in lots of movies that have broken it.” Per IGV News The Scandal That Chased James Franco Out Of Hollywood James Franco was at the height of his Hollywood trajectory when, in 2018, he was accused of sexual misconduct by five women, four of whom attended his now-closed acting school, Studio 4, which was launched in 2014. In an interview with the Los Angeles Times, Sarah Tither-Kaplan, one of the accusers, claimed that she and the other victims would give in to Franco's requests as they believed it would benefit their careers in the long run. "I feel there was an abuse of power, and there was a culture of exploiting non-celebrity women, and a culture of women being replaceable," she opined. The shocking allegations came at the height of the Me Too movement when numerous women in Hollywood, and all over the world, began raising awareness about sexual harassment and abuse in the entertainment industry and beyond. Therefore, the claims against the "General Hospital" alum cost Franco movie roles and even a decades-long friendship with collaborator Seth Rogen. James Franco discussed the sexual misconduct allegations made against him. Referring to the decision to call one of his acting school classes "Sex Scenes," the "Disaster Artist" star admitted that using that title was a stupid decision. Franco also acknowledged having romantic relationships with certain pupils, but clarified, "I didn't sleep with anybody in that particular class, but over the course of my teaching, I did sleep with students and that was wrong." During a 2018 episode of "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert," Franco strongly denied the sexual misconduct allegations. But, in October 2020, the women filed a lawsuit against Franco and two other men — one of whom co-owned the acting school with the "Freaks and Geeks" star — stating that the students were defrauded by Studio 4 and that they were constantly forced to perform sex scenes on camera. The matter was settled in 2021 when Franco and his fellow accused associates agreed to settle for $2.2 million.

SANTINO

2,004,109 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Samay Raina has completely outclassed Alia Bhatt in the inaugural episode of India's Got Latent Season 2. The debate has started. Approaching creators for film promotions is no longer a choice for many stars and filmmakers—it has become a necessity. The attention economy has changed, and the balance of power is shifting. Take India's Got Latent Season 2. The show has created such unprecedented buzz that it has found a home on both Netflix and YouTube simultaneously. That's a historic achievement and a reflection of how powerful creator-led content has become. On the other hand, despite the scale and ambition behind Alpha, the response to the communication so far has been mixed. I've personally experienced trolling while discussing the film. Some may argue that a section of it is paid trolling, but it would be unfair to ignore the genuine criticism that also exists. Even when we look at stars like Ranveer Singh and Ranbir Kapoor, both Dhurandar and Animal have come when directors extracted something exceptional from them. Great filmmaking still matter! Great storytelling still matters. The larger question is: what do stars need to do to get their sheen back? Should they become more accessible? Should they engage audiences beyond film releases? Should they embrace creators rather than merely use them for promotions? What are your thoughts? Has the creator economy permanently changed the hierarchy of entertainment?

Samay Raina has completely outclassed Alia Bhatt in the inaugural episode of India's Got Latent Season 2. The debate has started. Approaching creators for film promotions is no longer a choice for many stars and filmmakers—it has become a necessity. The attention economy has changed, and the balance of power is shifting. Take India's Got Latent Season 2. The show has created such unprecedented buzz that it has found a home on both Netflix and YouTube simultaneously. That's a historic achievement and a reflection of how powerful creator-led content has become. On the other hand, despite the scale and ambition behind Alpha, the response to the communication so far has been mixed. I've personally experienced trolling while discussing the film. Some may argue that a section of it is paid trolling, but it would be unfair to ignore the genuine criticism that also exists. Even when we look at stars like Ranveer Singh and Ranbir Kapoor, both Dhurandar and Animal have come when directors extracted something exceptional from them. Great filmmaking still matter! Great storytelling still matters. The larger question is: what do stars need to do to get their sheen back? Should they become more accessible? Should they engage audiences beyond film releases? Should they embrace creators rather than merely use them for promotions? What are your thoughts? Has the creator economy permanently changed the hierarchy of entertainment?

Faridoon Shahryar

27,912 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

My RLM finally went recursive! Looking at these logs is way too addictive please send help. Notes: > Sent it 10 long wikipedia articles about deep learning (~2M context). > Asked it to find BLEU scores from Attention paper & explain MHA from these articles > RLM controlled by the new Minimax 2.5 ! Minor prompt changes were needed from the RLM paper. > Spends first 3 iterations understanding data format, works through errors, until it locates the Attention article from the mess. Like a human would use a Jupyter Notebook. > Launches subagent on only AIAYN article > This subagent launches 2 more subagents to fetch (a) BLEU score and (b) MHA (my original two-part question) > The lowest subagent returns the output using "FINAL_VAR" (i.e. it does not generate the text! Just finds the correct location in the context and sends it back as a variable) > Recursion propagates upwards > Outermost LLM recieves the RLM output, and generates the full text response. > Took 2.5 minutes walltime. Max recursion depth level was 2. 12 LLM calls in total. (This video contains cuts when the LLM is thinking/generating) > Subagents never gets to see more than 2000 characters. Only the outermost LLM gets to see the full output - it's needed to answer the final question, but its only 200-300 tokens compared to 2M! > Fully async. Code execution and subagent tasks can happen simultaneously! I feel soooo satisfied. Been some time since I've been this excited about shooting a tutorial video.

My RLM finally went recursive! Looking at these logs is way too addictive please send help. Notes: > Sent it 10 long wikipedia articles about deep learning (~2M context). > Asked it to find BLEU scores from Attention paper & explain MHA from these articles > RLM controlled by the new Minimax 2.5 ! Minor prompt changes were needed from the RLM paper. > Spends first 3 iterations understanding data format, works through errors, until it locates the Attention article from the mess. Like a human would use a Jupyter Notebook. > Launches subagent on only AIAYN article > This subagent launches 2 more subagents to fetch (a) BLEU score and (b) MHA (my original two-part question) > The lowest subagent returns the output using "FINAL_VAR" (i.e. it does not generate the text! Just finds the correct location in the context and sends it back as a variable) > Recursion propagates upwards > Outermost LLM recieves the RLM output, and generates the full text response. > Took 2.5 minutes walltime. Max recursion depth level was 2. 12 LLM calls in total. (This video contains cuts when the LLM is thinking/generating) > Subagents never gets to see more than 2000 characters. Only the outermost LLM gets to see the full output - it's needed to answer the final question, but its only 200-300 tokens compared to 2M! > Fully async. Code execution and subagent tasks can happen simultaneously! I feel soooo satisfied. Been some time since I've been this excited about shooting a tutorial video.

AVB

38,241 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ihtesham Ali

22,640 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

#WATCH | Stampede at New Delhi railway station | Mohammad Hashim, a porter (coolie) at the railway station and an eyewitness narrates the scenes he saw yesterday; gets emotional as he recounts how a 4-year-old girl, who he saved, was resuscitated. "...We were working like any other day when we suddenly heard screams. All of us, all porters, rushed there. We saw children on the floor, women & men running helter-skelter. People were screaming. We pulled up a lot of children and brought them out. A few people had died and some others had fallen unconscious. We brought them to the ambulance. I rescued out 8-10 children...A woman was crying that her 4-year-old daughter died. I rescued the child and brought her out. Two minutes later, the child started breathing again, and she broke down. Her mother burst into tears of joy...We can call ourselves either brave or fools that we too jumped in, risking our lives...We saved several lives...I saw such scenes for the first time in my life...Entire staff, GRP, RPF and porters were working on it...The crowd was for several trains. It happens every day, not just yesterday. But only God knows what happened...But porters helped a lot, there are 1478 porters here..."

#WATCH | Stampede at New Delhi railway station | Mohammad Hashim, a porter (coolie) at the railway station and an eyewitness narrates the scenes he saw yesterday; gets emotional as he recounts how a 4-year-old girl, who he saved, was resuscitated. "...We were working like any other day when we suddenly heard screams. All of us, all porters, rushed there. We saw children on the floor, women & men running helter-skelter. People were screaming. We pulled up a lot of children and brought them out. A few people had died and some others had fallen unconscious. We brought them to the ambulance. I rescued out 8-10 children...A woman was crying that her 4-year-old daughter died. I rescued the child and brought her out. Two minutes later, the child started breathing again, and she broke down. Her mother burst into tears of joy...We can call ourselves either brave or fools that we too jumped in, risking our lives...We saved several lives...I saw such scenes for the first time in my life...Entire staff, GRP, RPF and porters were working on it...The crowd was for several trains. It happens every day, not just yesterday. But only God knows what happened...But porters helped a lot, there are 1478 porters here..."

ANI

38,870 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NEW: Joe Lonsdale with Laura Ingraham on Zohran Mamdani: "Communists and Islamists, the two greatest dangers to America....My friends and I are speaking up against him, and we're criticized... Meanwhile, he's this radical, anti-white communist. ...if this guy wins, he gets a $100 billion budget to use towards his cronies." Laura Ingraham: Does that not give us some insight into what he [Mamdani] really thinks about America, our history and our culture? Joe Lonsdale: This comes back to the red-green alliance, right? The communists and the Islamists, the two greatest dangers to America. Both sides hate America. Both sides hate our past. And want to tear it down. A lot of people on the right say, well, it's New York. They deserve it. They're on the left... they should suffer. But if this guy wins, he gets a $100 billion budget to use towards his cronies. And we've all seen, thanks to President Trump and his work, what they do when they use these budgets, they give them to their friends to promote radical activism. They fund terrible things. This is very dangerous stuff for somebody this extreme, and it's our job to speak up against it. ...it's crazy here in Silicon Valley. My friends and I are speaking up against him, and we're criticized... meanwhile, he's this radical anti-white communist. My friend Shaun Maguire who runs Sequoia, they tried to cancel him.... ...The US Navy was founded 200 years before 9/11. 9/11 wasn't when we started fighting the Islamists. It was 200 years before that when the Barbary pirates were taking millions of white slaves. Islamists have been a problem for a long time. They're still a major problem, and the right needs to pay attention to this again. It's going to keep being a bigger problem if we keep bringing these people into our country. ...there's a lot of really great Muslims in our country. I partner with a lot of Muslims around the world. The UAE is a moderate Muslim country... they actually joke now in the UAE that they don't send their kids to London anymore because they become radicalized if they go there. So I think we can partner with the Muslims that don't want to radicalize their kids and don't want communist Islamists taking over."

NEW: Joe Lonsdale with Laura Ingraham on Zohran Mamdani: "Communists and Islamists, the two greatest dangers to America....My friends and I are speaking up against him, and we're criticized... Meanwhile, he's this radical, anti-white communist. ...if this guy wins, he gets a $100 billion budget to use towards his cronies." Laura Ingraham: Does that not give us some insight into what he [Mamdani] really thinks about America, our history and our culture? Joe Lonsdale: This comes back to the red-green alliance, right? The communists and the Islamists, the two greatest dangers to America. Both sides hate America. Both sides hate our past. And want to tear it down. A lot of people on the right say, well, it's New York. They deserve it. They're on the left... they should suffer. But if this guy wins, he gets a $100 billion budget to use towards his cronies. And we've all seen, thanks to President Trump and his work, what they do when they use these budgets, they give them to their friends to promote radical activism. They fund terrible things. This is very dangerous stuff for somebody this extreme, and it's our job to speak up against it. ...it's crazy here in Silicon Valley. My friends and I are speaking up against him, and we're criticized... meanwhile, he's this radical anti-white communist. My friend Shaun Maguire who runs Sequoia, they tried to cancel him.... ...The US Navy was founded 200 years before 9/11. 9/11 wasn't when we started fighting the Islamists. It was 200 years before that when the Barbary pirates were taking millions of white slaves. Islamists have been a problem for a long time. They're still a major problem, and the right needs to pay attention to this again. It's going to keep being a bigger problem if we keep bringing these people into our country. ...there's a lot of really great Muslims in our country. I partner with a lot of Muslims around the world. The UAE is a moderate Muslim country... they actually joke now in the UAE that they don't send their kids to London anymore because they become radicalized if they go there. So I think we can partner with the Muslims that don't want to radicalize their kids and don't want communist Islamists taking over."

American Optimist

139,645 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

My take : Rarely do I personalise stories. But sometimes one must. Because I come from privilege. And let me use a cliché here - agency. I am fortunate to have both. I come from Haryana. I am married to someone who hails from western Uttar Pradesh. To say that either state ranks poorly on gender justice indices would be the polite version of the truth. My husband and I are also fortunate to still have familial roots in our ancestral villages. And every time I visit whether my village or his -the blessing is almost always the same: “Dudho nahao, puto phalo.” .. back in in the cities ... it translates loosely to: may you be the mother of a hundred sons - . In the village it's always said Literally In the city rarely said aloud but very precisely understood: may you become the mother of sons, because in this country even one son can dramatically elevate a families social standing. A son becomes status. Security. Social capital. He is the lifelong investment expected to yield lifelong returns. The one relationship through which hierarchy can be asserted - just by the virtue of gender - a son - And so the logic begins early. If there are only two glasses of milk, the son gets one not the daughter, sometimes not even the mother. If there is money for only one child’s education, it goes to the son, even if the daughter is brighter, more ambitious, more capable. Investment, after all, is expected to bring returns. And from that logic flows an entire ecosystem: dowry, control, dependence, harassment, silence. What we often describe as “tradition” is, in reality, an economic and social structure built around the premium value assigned to sons. Even when the son is getting married - the privilege of that association is understood to be so acute that the girls family should naturally bear all expenses of the wedding . The tragedy is not only that women are oppressed by it. The tragedy is also that many women are compelled to uphold it, because in deeply unequal systems survival itself becomes transactional. so we can continue to pontificate on #Twisha's death, but we all know the one brutal truth that killed her - we did - we killed twisha : the obsessive premium we attach to a male child. The lifelong social privilege of a “son” has created collateral damage for every woman alive in India . This desire cuts across class, caste, and religion alike. Twisha is dead. But her story survives in the collective, generational silence of women who endured but survived. women who, in some form, exist in each of our homes... and we all know them - very often we are them !

My take : Rarely do I personalise stories. But sometimes one must. Because I come from privilege. And let me use a cliché here - agency. I am fortunate to have both. I come from Haryana. I am married to someone who hails from western Uttar Pradesh. To say that either state ranks poorly on gender justice indices would be the polite version of the truth. My husband and I are also fortunate to still have familial roots in our ancestral villages. And every time I visit whether my village or his -the blessing is almost always the same: “Dudho nahao, puto phalo.” .. back in in the cities ... it translates loosely to: may you be the mother of a hundred sons - . In the village it's always said Literally In the city rarely said aloud but very precisely understood: may you become the mother of sons, because in this country even one son can dramatically elevate a families social standing. A son becomes status. Security. Social capital. He is the lifelong investment expected to yield lifelong returns. The one relationship through which hierarchy can be asserted - just by the virtue of gender - a son - And so the logic begins early. If there are only two glasses of milk, the son gets one not the daughter, sometimes not even the mother. If there is money for only one child’s education, it goes to the son, even if the daughter is brighter, more ambitious, more capable. Investment, after all, is expected to bring returns. And from that logic flows an entire ecosystem: dowry, control, dependence, harassment, silence. What we often describe as “tradition” is, in reality, an economic and social structure built around the premium value assigned to sons. Even when the son is getting married - the privilege of that association is understood to be so acute that the girls family should naturally bear all expenses of the wedding . The tragedy is not only that women are oppressed by it. The tragedy is also that many women are compelled to uphold it, because in deeply unequal systems survival itself becomes transactional. so we can continue to pontificate on #Twisha's death, but we all know the one brutal truth that killed her - we did - we killed twisha : the obsessive premium we attach to a male child. The lifelong social privilege of a “son” has created collateral damage for every woman alive in India . This desire cuts across class, caste, and religion alike. Twisha is dead. But her story survives in the collective, generational silence of women who endured but survived. women who, in some form, exist in each of our homes... and we all know them - very often we are them !

Preeti Choudhry

62,875 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

𝗗𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿: Because I almost always have some gear with me—a drone, a mirrorless camera, or at least a phone—I can capture scenes on the spur of the moment. Here I am freely flying through 3D Gaussian Splats scenes trained from these impromptu captures. It has been several years now since I've developed a real passion for 3D scanning, photogrammetry, and—for the last two and a half years—radiance fields. We actively use these technologies on a professional level at Dpt. , but this is also a personal passion of mine. I love capturing scenes, places, people, moments in time—memories. I enjoy the process of doing it; yes, capturing several hundreds of photos at a time, going in circles around a 'subject' for 15 minutes—all of which can drive my family nuts when they're with me. I have fun pre-processing, aligning, and using datasets to finally see those memories form and then be able to explore them freely in real-time. This week, Meta announced Hyperscape during this year's Meta Connect event… "𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵, 𝘵𝘰𝘰. 𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘩𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦—𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘵 𝘏𝘺𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘦." …it's exciting to see major players like Meta pushing the boundaries of immersive experiences. Their announcement of Hyperscape resonates deeply with the work I've been doing and my passion for capturing and recreating photorealistic environments and memories. It feels like we're all moving toward a future where the lines between the physical and digital worlds blur, allowing us to share spaces and moments in unprecedented ways. I'm thrilled to be contributing my own explorations to this ever-evolving field. The attached video is a screen recording of myself exploring and flying through volumetric captures—dormant memories—in real-time using an app I crafted for this purpose. The first part shows me moving from one memory to another (btw, this works in tethered VR), and in the second part of the video at , I explore two memories simultaneously, rendering two 3D Gaussian Splats of the same location onto two monitors. #gaussiansplatting #radiancefield #digitaltwin #hyperscape #memories

𝗗𝗼𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝗠𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗿𝘆 𝗩𝗶𝗲𝘄𝗲𝗿: Because I almost always have some gear with me—a drone, a mirrorless camera, or at least a phone—I can capture scenes on the spur of the moment. Here I am freely flying through 3D Gaussian Splats scenes trained from these impromptu captures. It has been several years now since I've developed a real passion for 3D scanning, photogrammetry, and—for the last two and a half years—radiance fields. We actively use these technologies on a professional level at Dpt. , but this is also a personal passion of mine. I love capturing scenes, places, people, moments in time—memories. I enjoy the process of doing it; yes, capturing several hundreds of photos at a time, going in circles around a 'subject' for 15 minutes—all of which can drive my family nuts when they're with me. I have fun pre-processing, aligning, and using datasets to finally see those memories form and then be able to explore them freely in real-time. This week, Meta announced Hyperscape during this year's Meta Connect event… "𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘢𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘧 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘦𝘯𝘤𝘦, 𝘸𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘪𝘮𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵, 𝘵𝘰𝘰. 𝘞𝘦’𝘳𝘦 𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘱𝘩𝘰𝘵𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘴𝘵𝘪𝘤 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘰 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘦, 𝘦𝘯𝘢𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘢 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘧𝘰𝘶𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘦𝘸 𝘸𝘢𝘺 𝘵𝘰 𝘣𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘨𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘴𝘱𝘢𝘤𝘦𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘭𝘰𝘰𝘬 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘧𝘦𝘦𝘭 𝘭𝘪𝘬𝘦 𝘺𝘰𝘶’𝘳𝘦 𝘱𝘩𝘺𝘴𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦—𝘸𝘦 𝘤𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘪𝘵 𝘏𝘺𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘤𝘢𝘱𝘦." …it's exciting to see major players like Meta pushing the boundaries of immersive experiences. Their announcement of Hyperscape resonates deeply with the work I've been doing and my passion for capturing and recreating photorealistic environments and memories. It feels like we're all moving toward a future where the lines between the physical and digital worlds blur, allowing us to share spaces and moments in unprecedented ways. I'm thrilled to be contributing my own explorations to this ever-evolving field. The attached video is a screen recording of myself exploring and flying through volumetric captures—dormant memories—in real-time using an app I crafted for this purpose. The first part shows me moving from one memory to another (btw, this works in tethered VR), and in the second part of the video at , I explore two memories simultaneously, rendering two 3D Gaussian Splats of the same location onto two monitors. #gaussiansplatting #radiancefield #digitaltwin #hyperscape #memories

Hugues Bruyère

16,304 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

THE SACRED PURPOSE OF ORGASM This knowledge has been kept from you by the tyrant consciousness that has controlled this plane, third dimensional planet Earth, for the past 6,000 years. The tyrants found that it was much easier to control your species if they brainwashed you with sexual guilt and suppressed your natural sexuality. The power that flows through your body is the same power that allows the rest of us (yes, you are not alone!) to access the myriad of nested layers of multidimensional realities that exist and have always existed all around you. Waves upon waves of energy Your scientists and doctors will tell you that an orgasm is a matter of blood and nerve endings. This physical explanation is not even the tip of the iceberg. Your orgasms take place in a realm that remains largely invisible to most of you. When you experience that sweet ephemeral pleasure you call orgasm, something is occurring in the invisible realm which is very powerful. If you were able to see the waves of energy that pour from your bodies at the moment of orgasm, you would be very careful what you think about when this happens. There are waves upon waves of energy generated by your chakras (energy centers), your endocrine system, and your physical reactions. Be very careful what you are thinking These waves of energy correlate precisely to your thoughts, meaning your consciousness. As you release these frequencies, an entire package flows out into the invisible realms. This is why it is very important for you to be careful of what you are thinking at this moment. Those who are foolish enough to tune into dark thoughts, such as pain and bondage, during their sexual experiences will find themselves plugged into a lower plane of consciousness with some very draining companions. All those wonderfully hideous images painted in the Middle Ages will give you a good idea of the company you can expect to keep. The mind parasites Not only will you hook yourself up to some very nasty entities, but you will find your sexual experience limited and limiting. Your lust will increase, but it will never really be satisfied. Those lower dimensional forces which you have invited to feed upon your orgasmic display will not want you to move on. They will always want more from you. This is why pornography, especially the victim style of pornography, has very big cooties! These negative draining parasitical entities can easily be felt even in cyberspace. A Sacred Orgasm draws pure souls If you want to use your experience to uplift you and your lover, then you both must focus on your mutual consciousness. Your endocrine system works in tandem with you chakras to emit waves of energy. These wave forms have the frequency and even color which correspond precisely with the level of your consciousness from your thoughts. These waves can be seen by those souls who are waiting in the invisible realms for an entry frequency. In simple terms, if you want a child when you are in sexual union, your orgasm will attract the level of consciousness you are creating. You will attract to you the type of consciousness you are generating. Magnetism is the law of the Invisible Realms: Like attracts like. The child/soul is attracted to a similar consciousness, meaning whatever thoughts you are having while you are making love. Your orgasm is an exact expression of your consciousness If you are drunk or on drugs, you will attract a soul from those realms. If you are angry or having some dark fantasy, then you will magnetize a soul from those realms. Consciousness is everything, even in the act of love making. Even if you are not creating a child, you are still sending out masses of energy onto the Earth plane and into the Invisible Realms. This energy greatly effects everything, including the fertility of your fields, the quality of your lives, and what you call Nature. The energies of orgasm can lift the entire planet, if properly done.

Sensitive content

THE SACRED PURPOSE OF ORGASM This knowledge has been kept from you by the tyrant consciousness that has controlled this plane, third dimensional planet Earth, for the past 6,000 years. The tyrants found that it was much easier to control your species if they brainwashed you with sexual guilt and suppressed your natural sexuality. The power that flows through your body is the same power that allows the rest of us (yes, you are not alone!) to access the myriad of nested layers of multidimensional realities that exist and have always existed all around you. Waves upon waves of energy Your scientists and doctors will tell you that an orgasm is a matter of blood and nerve endings. This physical explanation is not even the tip of the iceberg. Your orgasms take place in a realm that remains largely invisible to most of you. When you experience that sweet ephemeral pleasure you call orgasm, something is occurring in the invisible realm which is very powerful. If you were able to see the waves of energy that pour from your bodies at the moment of orgasm, you would be very careful what you think about when this happens. There are waves upon waves of energy generated by your chakras (energy centers), your endocrine system, and your physical reactions. Be very careful what you are thinking These waves of energy correlate precisely to your thoughts, meaning your consciousness. As you release these frequencies, an entire package flows out into the invisible realms. This is why it is very important for you to be careful of what you are thinking at this moment. Those who are foolish enough to tune into dark thoughts, such as pain and bondage, during their sexual experiences will find themselves plugged into a lower plane of consciousness with some very draining companions. All those wonderfully hideous images painted in the Middle Ages will give you a good idea of the company you can expect to keep. The mind parasites Not only will you hook yourself up to some very nasty entities, but you will find your sexual experience limited and limiting. Your lust will increase, but it will never really be satisfied. Those lower dimensional forces which you have invited to feed upon your orgasmic display will not want you to move on. They will always want more from you. This is why pornography, especially the victim style of pornography, has very big cooties! These negative draining parasitical entities can easily be felt even in cyberspace. A Sacred Orgasm draws pure souls If you want to use your experience to uplift you and your lover, then you both must focus on your mutual consciousness. Your endocrine system works in tandem with you chakras to emit waves of energy. These wave forms have the frequency and even color which correspond precisely with the level of your consciousness from your thoughts. These waves can be seen by those souls who are waiting in the invisible realms for an entry frequency. In simple terms, if you want a child when you are in sexual union, your orgasm will attract the level of consciousness you are creating. You will attract to you the type of consciousness you are generating. Magnetism is the law of the Invisible Realms: Like attracts like. The child/soul is attracted to a similar consciousness, meaning whatever thoughts you are having while you are making love. Your orgasm is an exact expression of your consciousness If you are drunk or on drugs, you will attract a soul from those realms. If you are angry or having some dark fantasy, then you will magnetize a soul from those realms. Consciousness is everything, even in the act of love making. Even if you are not creating a child, you are still sending out masses of energy onto the Earth plane and into the Invisible Realms. This energy greatly effects everything, including the fertility of your fields, the quality of your lives, and what you call Nature. The energies of orgasm can lift the entire planet, if properly done.

NEYƎИ

146,754 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

As a woman with a silly huge bust and a small frame I am well aware of the impact my form has on men. Any woman with similar proportions does. Many of us will try to shame men for finding the female form desirable while simultaneously refusing to admit that we do the exact same thing, and we tend to be far more mercenary about it. The reality is that while a woman's body gets attention men are far and away more likely to choose a woman based on how joyful and accepting she is. Lots of manosphere influencers will tell you men want a woman who brings them peace, and I don't think that's entirely accurate. I think men want women who bring them joy. Not just during courtship, or the honeymoon phase, but throughout their lives. Because oftentimes a fellas life is hard, extremely hard, and while peace is one thing, it's those moments of joy within those stretches of peace that really revitalize him. Give him purpose. "I was fun and sweet when we met, and now he has to accept the real me." No. The "real you" has to include sustained joy or the deal was false advertising. Often times this joy takes the form of children, or shared experiences, or just moments of sweetness and memories and they can be extremely esoteric things too. Things you wouldn't even expect. I believe a lot of women lose sight of that reality, and to some extent men do too. Men need more than just peace, they need a reason to keep going and the women in their lives are often instrumental in showing them there is.

Sensitive content

As a woman with a silly huge bust and a small frame I am well aware of the impact my form has on men. Any woman with similar proportions does. Many of us will try to shame men for finding the female form desirable while simultaneously refusing to admit that we do the exact same thing, and we tend to be far more mercenary about it. The reality is that while a woman's body gets attention men are far and away more likely to choose a woman based on how joyful and accepting she is. Lots of manosphere influencers will tell you men want a woman who brings them peace, and I don't think that's entirely accurate. I think men want women who bring them joy. Not just during courtship, or the honeymoon phase, but throughout their lives. Because oftentimes a fellas life is hard, extremely hard, and while peace is one thing, it's those moments of joy within those stretches of peace that really revitalize him. Give him purpose. "I was fun and sweet when we met, and now he has to accept the real me." No. The "real you" has to include sustained joy or the deal was false advertising. Often times this joy takes the form of children, or shared experiences, or just moments of sweetness and memories and they can be extremely esoteric things too. Things you wouldn't even expect. I believe a lot of women lose sight of that reality, and to some extent men do too. Men need more than just peace, they need a reason to keep going and the women in their lives are often instrumental in showing them there is.

BLACK DUMPLING™

44,047 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

When you live in a country where women can easily be mobilised to take sticks, sjamboks, and stones to beat up an imaginary evil spirit that is stopping them from finding a husband, the kleptomaniacs in charge of government in that country can rule forever. These are the same people that will go and vote! Our people still believe in utter nonsense!!!No wonder ZANUPF does whatever it wants with reckless abandon. The complex interplay between societal beliefs, manipulation, and political power in Zimbabwe is wild. The fact that some women can be mobilised to participate in such bizarre rituals reflects a deeper issue of superstition and desperation in the face of socioeconomic challenges. Samora Machel, the first president of independent Mozambique, spoke out strongly against superstition, which he saw as a tool of oppression and backwardness that hindered African progress. One of his most quoted lines on the subject is; “Superstition is the religion of feeble minds.” Machel came to Zimbabwe and spoke out against superstitious behaviour and tribalism at a political rally attended by both Robert Mugabe and Emmerson Mnangagwa. He consistently urged Mozambicans and Africans to reject superstitious beliefs and embrace scientific reasoning. He viewed superstition as a colonial legacy used to keep people ignorant and submissive, and he believed that development and liberation required breaking free from such thinking. When a significant portion of a country’s population is preoccupied with supernatural concerns, it creates an opportunity for political leaders to exploit these beliefs and manipulate the masses. That is why ZANUPF works with these bogus prophets so that many remain under the cover of darkness created by these false prophets! This diversionary tactic allows those in power to maintain control while neglecting their responsibilities to address pressing issues such as poverty, corruption, and the crumbling social welfare system. The delusional masses are simply told that it is God’s timing! Today, all these women are preoccupied with looking for husbands instead of asking why there is 95% unemployment, which leaves the majority of men jobless and contributes to broken marriages. It is common sense, isn’t it? As long as people continue to believe in utter nonsense like beating up evil spirits that are supposedly holding them back from getting married, the ruling party can use these superstitions to consolidate its power and avoid accountability. This cycle of manipulation and exploitation not only perpetuates a flawed political system but also hinders overall societal progress. These women should be “beating up” ZANUPF for destroying the economy, not some imaginary evil spirit. Surely, critical thinking is not as common as it should be! How can Zimbabwe develop with such stupidity in huge abundance?

When you live in a country where women can easily be mobilised to take sticks, sjamboks, and stones to beat up an imaginary evil spirit that is stopping them from finding a husband, the kleptomaniacs in charge of government in that country can rule forever. These are the same people that will go and vote! Our people still believe in utter nonsense!!!No wonder ZANUPF does whatever it wants with reckless abandon. The complex interplay between societal beliefs, manipulation, and political power in Zimbabwe is wild. The fact that some women can be mobilised to participate in such bizarre rituals reflects a deeper issue of superstition and desperation in the face of socioeconomic challenges. Samora Machel, the first president of independent Mozambique, spoke out strongly against superstition, which he saw as a tool of oppression and backwardness that hindered African progress. One of his most quoted lines on the subject is; “Superstition is the religion of feeble minds.” Machel came to Zimbabwe and spoke out against superstitious behaviour and tribalism at a political rally attended by both Robert Mugabe and Emmerson Mnangagwa. He consistently urged Mozambicans and Africans to reject superstitious beliefs and embrace scientific reasoning. He viewed superstition as a colonial legacy used to keep people ignorant and submissive, and he believed that development and liberation required breaking free from such thinking. When a significant portion of a country’s population is preoccupied with supernatural concerns, it creates an opportunity for political leaders to exploit these beliefs and manipulate the masses. That is why ZANUPF works with these bogus prophets so that many remain under the cover of darkness created by these false prophets! This diversionary tactic allows those in power to maintain control while neglecting their responsibilities to address pressing issues such as poverty, corruption, and the crumbling social welfare system. The delusional masses are simply told that it is God’s timing! Today, all these women are preoccupied with looking for husbands instead of asking why there is 95% unemployment, which leaves the majority of men jobless and contributes to broken marriages. It is common sense, isn’t it? As long as people continue to believe in utter nonsense like beating up evil spirits that are supposedly holding them back from getting married, the ruling party can use these superstitions to consolidate its power and avoid accountability. This cycle of manipulation and exploitation not only perpetuates a flawed political system but also hinders overall societal progress. These women should be “beating up” ZANUPF for destroying the economy, not some imaginary evil spirit. Surely, critical thinking is not as common as it should be! How can Zimbabwe develop with such stupidity in huge abundance?

Hopewell Chin’ono

56,142 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I can't believe some of the comments/messages saying "you drew yourself like a child to attract creeps" so I traced over my own irl body to show you. Anime characters usually have bigger heads than normal humans, so the only difference here is the character's head that is just slightly bigger. The photo is from 2023, when i was 23. My hair was shorter and straightened so it isn't as poofy. The drawing was "when i wake up" themed so I drew my bed hair. I have curly hair, so my hair gets really frizzy unless I use a lot of products which I don't when I'm at home. I also would like to say that no, I am NOT trying to attract anyone, I am married and I do not draw any lewd content about myself or my persona. I am just short and skinny, I have tried to gain weight for years but I can't due to a chronic disease. And the duck printed pajamas, the short, the tank top, even the hairtie I drew are things I own and wear the most when I'm at home. The pajama set was actually a birthday gift cause my favorite color is yellow. I'm just really disappointed. Women like me exist, I have friends and family who are even smaller than me, my mom's aunt is 140cm. My teacher in uni was 142cm. Not everyone is tall and curvy. I wished I was talled so many times and I got bullied enough for having a "child-like" figure irl. I hope this clears any misunderstanding that might've been caused.

Sensitive content

I can't believe some of the comments/messages saying "you drew yourself like a child to attract creeps" so I traced over my own irl body to show you. Anime characters usually have bigger heads than normal humans, so the only difference here is the character's head that is just slightly bigger. The photo is from 2023, when i was 23. My hair was shorter and straightened so it isn't as poofy. The drawing was "when i wake up" themed so I drew my bed hair. I have curly hair, so my hair gets really frizzy unless I use a lot of products which I don't when I'm at home. I also would like to say that no, I am NOT trying to attract anyone, I am married and I do not draw any lewd content about myself or my persona. I am just short and skinny, I have tried to gain weight for years but I can't due to a chronic disease. And the duck printed pajamas, the short, the tank top, even the hairtie I drew are things I own and wear the most when I'm at home. The pajama set was actually a birthday gift cause my favorite color is yellow. I'm just really disappointed. Women like me exist, I have friends and family who are even smaller than me, my mom's aunt is 140cm. My teacher in uni was 142cm. Not everyone is tall and curvy. I wished I was talled so many times and I got bullied enough for having a "child-like" figure irl. I hope this clears any misunderstanding that might've been caused.

Ruru ❄️🤍 Comms open

979,000 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

The world of writing has changed forever. AI is getting really good, really fast. ChatGPT is already a better writer than most humans and some professional writers. So, what’s the future of writing? 18 thoughts from Tyler Cowen: 1) Don't let AI smooth out your idiosyncrasies. Let your writing stay weird and uniquely yours. 2) Generic content is dying and the burden is on you as the writer to be distinctive. 3) The more personal your writing becomes, the more future-proof it is. Nobody wants to read memoirs from AI, even if they're technically "better." 4) Use AI as your secondary literature when you read — not just for quick answers, but as a thinking companion. As Tyler puts it, "I'll keep on asking the AI: 'What do you think of chapter two? What happened there? What are some puzzles?' It just gets me thinking... and I'm smarter about the thing in the final analysis." 5) Hallucinations aren't the crisis everyone makes them out to be. No matter the source, if you're going to use a piece of information, you should double-check it. This is true for both books and AI. 6) Secrets will become more valuable in an AI-driven world. 7) One way to use AI as a writer is to research fields you aren't as familiar with before you start writing about them. Tyler said: "I just wrote a column about declassifying classified documents. I don't know that law very well. I asked the AI for a lot of background... now I feel like I'm not an idiot on the topic." 8) AI changes what books are even worth writing. "Predictive books and books about the near future. They don't make sense to write anymore." 9) Editing trick: Try running your writing through AI and asking what some people might find obnoxious. It’s a surprisingly powerful editing trick. 10) When prompting AI, put humans out of your mind and imagine you're talking to an alien or a non-human animal. 11) Many of the most significant AI advancements are likely happening behind closed doors. For example, I hear that Google allows employees to use Gemini with virtually unlimited context windows. 12) What possibilities do large context windows open up? Researchers will be able to load entire regulatory frameworks, historical archives, or massive datasets like "tax records from Renaissance Florence" into a single query. 13) The rate of AI improvement matters more than its current capabilities. As Tyler puts it, "This is the worst they will ever be" is key to understanding their trajectory. "A lot of people don't get that. They're impressed by what they see in the moment, but they don't understand the rate of improvement." 14) The best way to appreciate the current rate of improvement is to use the latest models. 15) Being non-technical can sometimes be an advantage when thinking about AI. Here’s Tyler: "If you're not focused on the technical side, you will see other things more clearly... You just focus on what is this actually good for? And not, am I impressed by all the neat bells and whistles on this advance with AI?" 16) How Tyler uses AI to prep for podcast interviews: Don't waste time asking AI for generic interview questions or broad topics. Tyler says that's the worst question you can ask an AI. It’s “too normy.” Instead, ask specific questions about historical examples and get context. Then, let your own creative questions emerge. 17) Your relationship with mentors and peers becomes more crucial, not less, in an AI world. "Two pieces of general advice with or without AI in the world." Tyler says: "Get more and better mentors and work every day at improving the quality of your peer network." 18) The divide between AI and humans creates a striking paradox. As Tyler puts it: "On one hand the AIs are getting so much better, so learn how to use the AIs. On the other hand, the AIs are getting so much better, so invest in these other things that aren't AI—pure networks. You've gotta do both." I've shared the full conversation with tylercowen below. In the replies, I've also linked to a full transcript and relevant links to YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts if you want to listen there. And if you want a bite-size entry to the episode, I've shared some clips in the replies too.

The world of writing has changed forever. AI is getting really good, really fast. ChatGPT is already a better writer than most humans and some professional writers. So, what’s the future of writing? 18 thoughts from Tyler Cowen: 1) Don't let AI smooth out your idiosyncrasies. Let your writing stay weird and uniquely yours. 2) Generic content is dying and the burden is on you as the writer to be distinctive. 3) The more personal your writing becomes, the more future-proof it is. Nobody wants to read memoirs from AI, even if they're technically "better." 4) Use AI as your secondary literature when you read — not just for quick answers, but as a thinking companion. As Tyler puts it, "I'll keep on asking the AI: 'What do you think of chapter two? What happened there? What are some puzzles?' It just gets me thinking... and I'm smarter about the thing in the final analysis." 5) Hallucinations aren't the crisis everyone makes them out to be. No matter the source, if you're going to use a piece of information, you should double-check it. This is true for both books and AI. 6) Secrets will become more valuable in an AI-driven world. 7) One way to use AI as a writer is to research fields you aren't as familiar with before you start writing about them. Tyler said: "I just wrote a column about declassifying classified documents. I don't know that law very well. I asked the AI for a lot of background... now I feel like I'm not an idiot on the topic." 8) AI changes what books are even worth writing. "Predictive books and books about the near future. They don't make sense to write anymore." 9) Editing trick: Try running your writing through AI and asking what some people might find obnoxious. It’s a surprisingly powerful editing trick. 10) When prompting AI, put humans out of your mind and imagine you're talking to an alien or a non-human animal. 11) Many of the most significant AI advancements are likely happening behind closed doors. For example, I hear that Google allows employees to use Gemini with virtually unlimited context windows. 12) What possibilities do large context windows open up? Researchers will be able to load entire regulatory frameworks, historical archives, or massive datasets like "tax records from Renaissance Florence" into a single query. 13) The rate of AI improvement matters more than its current capabilities. As Tyler puts it, "This is the worst they will ever be" is key to understanding their trajectory. "A lot of people don't get that. They're impressed by what they see in the moment, but they don't understand the rate of improvement." 14) The best way to appreciate the current rate of improvement is to use the latest models. 15) Being non-technical can sometimes be an advantage when thinking about AI. Here’s Tyler: "If you're not focused on the technical side, you will see other things more clearly... You just focus on what is this actually good for? And not, am I impressed by all the neat bells and whistles on this advance with AI?" 16) How Tyler uses AI to prep for podcast interviews: Don't waste time asking AI for generic interview questions or broad topics. Tyler says that's the worst question you can ask an AI. It’s “too normy.” Instead, ask specific questions about historical examples and get context. Then, let your own creative questions emerge. 17) Your relationship with mentors and peers becomes more crucial, not less, in an AI world. "Two pieces of general advice with or without AI in the world." Tyler says: "Get more and better mentors and work every day at improving the quality of your peer network." 18) The divide between AI and humans creates a striking paradox. As Tyler puts it: "On one hand the AIs are getting so much better, so learn how to use the AIs. On the other hand, the AIs are getting so much better, so invest in these other things that aren't AI—pure networks. You've gotta do both." I've shared the full conversation with tylercowen below. In the replies, I've also linked to a full transcript and relevant links to YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts if you want to listen there. And if you want a bite-size entry to the episode, I've shared some clips in the replies too.

David Perell

175,011 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Most people only know Temu and Shein. But I know three platforms you can order from at very cheap prices. They're platforms where Chinese people actually shop on, so things are way cheaper there because you're buying directly from the producers. Even Temu gets its goods from some of these platforms. Likewise, a lot of "mini importers" in Nigeria use these websites. All those WhatsApp and Facebook vendors you see around, they get their goods from these websites at very low prices, then they inflate the prices when they want to resell. I'll mention them below and share their links in the comments section. 1.▫️1688 Best for clothes, shoes, bags, phone accessories, electronics, home appliances, and just about anything in bulk. They offer wholesale prices, but you may need to make bulk orders (10 to 100+ units). It's best for people who want to resell. The language on this website is Chinese, so you'll have to translate it. The video below explains how. 2.▫️Taobao Best for fashion, jewelry, home decor, gadgets, and niche items you can't easily find elsewhere. They sell single items easily, have a huge variety, and even better quality than what gets imported to Temu. It's good for both individuals and resellers. 3.▫️Pinduoduo Best for everyday items, kitchenware, phone accessories, small gadgets, and household basics. This is similar to Taobao, and often even cheaper. It's a great place for everyday buys. NOTE, though: Also, none of these websites ship internationally. You'll need a shipping agent to receive your order in China and forward it to you. It's also best to order in bulk. Some of the agents include: - Superbuy - CSSBuy To use a shipping agent: 1. Create an agent account on any of the agent website I'll share in the comments. 2. Paste the product link from 1688, Taobao, or PDD into their search bar. 2. The agent buys it and receives it at their warehouse. 3. You pay a service fee, then shipping once it arrives. 3. Agent ships to you, sometimes combining items to save cost. Just make sure to always read the descriptions. Sort by best-selling, read reviews and check the photos shared by reviewers instead of relying on product pictures. I'm sure you learnt something. Stay sharp! 🪒

Most people only know Temu and Shein. But I know three platforms you can order from at very cheap prices. They're platforms where Chinese people actually shop on, so things are way cheaper there because you're buying directly from the producers. Even Temu gets its goods from some of these platforms. Likewise, a lot of "mini importers" in Nigeria use these websites. All those WhatsApp and Facebook vendors you see around, they get their goods from these websites at very low prices, then they inflate the prices when they want to resell. I'll mention them below and share their links in the comments section. 1.▫️1688 Best for clothes, shoes, bags, phone accessories, electronics, home appliances, and just about anything in bulk. They offer wholesale prices, but you may need to make bulk orders (10 to 100+ units). It's best for people who want to resell. The language on this website is Chinese, so you'll have to translate it. The video below explains how. 2.▫️Taobao Best for fashion, jewelry, home decor, gadgets, and niche items you can't easily find elsewhere. They sell single items easily, have a huge variety, and even better quality than what gets imported to Temu. It's good for both individuals and resellers. 3.▫️Pinduoduo Best for everyday items, kitchenware, phone accessories, small gadgets, and household basics. This is similar to Taobao, and often even cheaper. It's a great place for everyday buys. NOTE, though: Also, none of these websites ship internationally. You'll need a shipping agent to receive your order in China and forward it to you. It's also best to order in bulk. Some of the agents include: - Superbuy - CSSBuy To use a shipping agent: 1. Create an agent account on any of the agent website I'll share in the comments. 2. Paste the product link from 1688, Taobao, or PDD into their search bar. 2. The agent buys it and receives it at their warehouse. 3. You pay a service fee, then shipping once it arrives. 3. Agent ships to you, sometimes combining items to save cost. Just make sure to always read the descriptions. Sort by best-selling, read reviews and check the photos shared by reviewers instead of relying on product pictures. I'm sure you learnt something. Stay sharp! 🪒

YUA

776,996 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

"If you watch 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Ki!!er' (1986) often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy." --- John McNaughton Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: Henry isn’t entirely unsympathetic, is he? McNaughton: I think of Henry as being a monster, but Ottis is the beast. Henry’s a bit like Frankenstein’s monster – there might just be that little bit of goodness somewhere deep inside that might come out. But once Ottis starts following Henry’s “teachings”, so to speak, he just gives way to his worst impulses and he becomes the beast. Henry is the “better” of the two, if you can make that comparison. It’s not like in most serial-ki!!er films, where what they normally do is present the ki!!er as some evil creature who will not be redeemed, so the audience doesn’t have to bother thinking any deeper thoughts. With Henry, no moral judgement is provided, so you have to think for yourself. Now that’s always been a tough sell in Hollywood. Interviewer: And there’s also a surprising amount of humour in the movie, albeit mostly very black humour. McNaughton: If you watch it often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy. Tom Towles, who plays Ottis, his training was with the Second City group – improvisational comedy. He’s great at playing buffoons, and I’ve used him several times since. The relationship between Henry and Ottis is, at certain points, a little like a bickering couple – like when Ottis smashes the TV in, or when the video-camera breaks and they have their little argument in the car. The way they played those scenes makes me laugh – but of course there’s a lot about the film that’s so shocking that if somebody saw it just once they might think you were crazy to even think of laughing at it. Interviewer: Do you think the film still has the same power to shock, 18 years after you made it? McNaughton: I think it does, yes, though not quite as much as when it first came out – because this kind of thing really hadn’t been seen before. And we were trying to do something different with the presentation of the violent scenes. If you take the early scene where they ki!! the TV man – he’s this repulsive man who goads them until they attack him. It’s a quite traditional setup of introducing a distasteful character, and you’re rooting for the hero to dispatch him. And of course he gets the TV smashed over his head – it’s a kind of gratifying use of violence. Then later we have the ‘home invasion’ sequence, and that’s very different – it’s like a home movie of the massacre of a completely innocent family, chosen at random. We watch them slaughtered, and hopefully people will ask themselves – how entertaining is violence, really? Interviewer: Because in the mid-80s when the film came out, there were many violent films – the 'Rambos' and 'Terminators' and the like. McNaughton: Well, normally the hero goes and shoots a thousand people, and that’s the kind of violence that was shown in movies at the time. We didn’t exactly have those specific films in mind when we made 'Henry', but when trying to tell the story, we realised it was a lot to do with violence, so we tried to dig a little deeper." (John McNaughton's interview with Neil Young, Jigsaw Lounge)

"If you watch 'Henry: Portrait of a Serial Ki!!er' (1986) often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy." --- John McNaughton Full Excerpt: "Interviewer: Henry isn’t entirely unsympathetic, is he? McNaughton: I think of Henry as being a monster, but Ottis is the beast. Henry’s a bit like Frankenstein’s monster – there might just be that little bit of goodness somewhere deep inside that might come out. But once Ottis starts following Henry’s “teachings”, so to speak, he just gives way to his worst impulses and he becomes the beast. Henry is the “better” of the two, if you can make that comparison. It’s not like in most serial-ki!!er films, where what they normally do is present the ki!!er as some evil creature who will not be redeemed, so the audience doesn’t have to bother thinking any deeper thoughts. With Henry, no moral judgement is provided, so you have to think for yourself. Now that’s always been a tough sell in Hollywood. Interviewer: And there’s also a surprising amount of humour in the movie, albeit mostly very black humour. McNaughton: If you watch it often enough, you realise that in a way it’s like an extremely bizarre comedy. Tom Towles, who plays Ottis, his training was with the Second City group – improvisational comedy. He’s great at playing buffoons, and I’ve used him several times since. The relationship between Henry and Ottis is, at certain points, a little like a bickering couple – like when Ottis smashes the TV in, or when the video-camera breaks and they have their little argument in the car. The way they played those scenes makes me laugh – but of course there’s a lot about the film that’s so shocking that if somebody saw it just once they might think you were crazy to even think of laughing at it. Interviewer: Do you think the film still has the same power to shock, 18 years after you made it? McNaughton: I think it does, yes, though not quite as much as when it first came out – because this kind of thing really hadn’t been seen before. And we were trying to do something different with the presentation of the violent scenes. If you take the early scene where they ki!! the TV man – he’s this repulsive man who goads them until they attack him. It’s a quite traditional setup of introducing a distasteful character, and you’re rooting for the hero to dispatch him. And of course he gets the TV smashed over his head – it’s a kind of gratifying use of violence. Then later we have the ‘home invasion’ sequence, and that’s very different – it’s like a home movie of the massacre of a completely innocent family, chosen at random. We watch them slaughtered, and hopefully people will ask themselves – how entertaining is violence, really? Interviewer: Because in the mid-80s when the film came out, there were many violent films – the 'Rambos' and 'Terminators' and the like. McNaughton: Well, normally the hero goes and shoots a thousand people, and that’s the kind of violence that was shown in movies at the time. We didn’t exactly have those specific films in mind when we made 'Henry', but when trying to tell the story, we realised it was a lot to do with violence, so we tried to dig a little deeper." (John McNaughton's interview with Neil Young, Jigsaw Lounge)

DepressedBergman

37,186 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Samuel Hudson will delete his social media accounts soon, and I hope that guy gets help. For years he’s cyber stalked and confabulated stories, while coercing and manipulating individuals online. How many people has he targeted and fixated on over the years ? Lots. And mostly women, especially gender critical women. He’s a trans-activist and a keen advocate for men in women’s spaces . He has an interest in children’s ‘mental health’ and has voiced support for RSE in schools, hate speech laws and maintains he is a devotee of Jacinda Ardern’s ‘be kind’ philosophy. Of late he has been a vociferous supporter of Greens MP Benjamin Doyle, and has made the Bussy scandal the focus of his posts for the last 4 weeks. Last night he was alerted that several people became aware of an extremely hard core and disturbing pornography Channel he ran for the past five years - starring himself. In over 170 videos he filmed himself doing, illegal and disgusting acts. Last night after he became aware people had found his secret content he immediately deleted the channel, but as we know the internet is forever. Most reading this will not know who he is, some will, he says he is a journalist - he’s not . What he is, is the product of the far left, a 25 year old who is unable to control his compulsions, or moderate his emotional response or understand consequences. He is the product of identity politics, hyped up on the ‘us vs them’ mentality, mentored by older men, known Marxists he has become radicalised, disturbed and in my opinion dangerous. He has multiple online accounts, numerous in fact - literally a spreadsheets worth. Worryingly he has set up a network of Facebook messenger ‘chat groups’ with the subject ‘education’. Some 560 unwitting parents had joined one such group until just last week they became suspicious of why he was asking particular questions when confronted by one parent the chat group was abruptly terminated. Hudson is supposedly launching a media company called ‘ThisQuality’ in which he intends to use to defame, attack, dox and torment those who have opposing views, in particular those views on Transgenderism. It is hardly surprising that someone so disturbed is agitating for men in women’s spaces. I believe the far left have taken advantage of a troubled mind and moulded it into very dangerous one. Game’s up Sam.

Sensitive content

Samuel Hudson will delete his social media accounts soon, and I hope that guy gets help. For years he’s cyber stalked and confabulated stories, while coercing and manipulating individuals online. How many people has he targeted and fixated on over the years ? Lots. And mostly women, especially gender critical women. He’s a trans-activist and a keen advocate for men in women’s spaces . He has an interest in children’s ‘mental health’ and has voiced support for RSE in schools, hate speech laws and maintains he is a devotee of Jacinda Ardern’s ‘be kind’ philosophy. Of late he has been a vociferous supporter of Greens MP Benjamin Doyle, and has made the Bussy scandal the focus of his posts for the last 4 weeks. Last night he was alerted that several people became aware of an extremely hard core and disturbing pornography Channel he ran for the past five years - starring himself. In over 170 videos he filmed himself doing, illegal and disgusting acts. Last night after he became aware people had found his secret content he immediately deleted the channel, but as we know the internet is forever. Most reading this will not know who he is, some will, he says he is a journalist - he’s not . What he is, is the product of the far left, a 25 year old who is unable to control his compulsions, or moderate his emotional response or understand consequences. He is the product of identity politics, hyped up on the ‘us vs them’ mentality, mentored by older men, known Marxists he has become radicalised, disturbed and in my opinion dangerous. He has multiple online accounts, numerous in fact - literally a spreadsheets worth. Worryingly he has set up a network of Facebook messenger ‘chat groups’ with the subject ‘education’. Some 560 unwitting parents had joined one such group until just last week they became suspicious of why he was asking particular questions when confronted by one parent the chat group was abruptly terminated. Hudson is supposedly launching a media company called ‘ThisQuality’ in which he intends to use to defame, attack, dox and torment those who have opposing views, in particular those views on Transgenderism. It is hardly surprising that someone so disturbed is agitating for men in women’s spaces. I believe the far left have taken advantage of a troubled mind and moulded it into very dangerous one. Game’s up Sam.

Holyhekatuiteka

30,382 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr