Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Some interesting work being applied in Manchester Utd training already by Ruben Amorim and his staff. A tactical attack v defence drill, including a transitional element involving a 30-40m recovery run on a “ball is lost” trigger. Interesting given the research shows that 30-40% of high intensity runs in...

455,668 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля STATSports
STATSports1 год назад

Here’s a designed example of what the Sonra Live iPad interface looks like, incorporating that RAG (Red/Amber/Green) traffic light system. Coaches can monitor players on an individual basis through % Max Speed exposures, Time in Redzone spent and % Max HR reached during drills or sessions alongside individualised session targets or thresholds for up to 16 different session types per player.

Фото профиля Graham Anderson
Graham Anderson1 год назад

What a load of bollocks - no wonder football is so boring to watch now - you don’t have to study the stats to know some of these frauds don’t run around

Фото профиля ウダイ
ウダイ1 год назад

rashford cant hide now. some others as well

Фото профиля Sage
Sage1 год назад

Yeah Rashford is done

Фото профиля Super-Ally
Super-Ally1 год назад

@Ja_mc15

Фото профиля Adrian Foster
Adrian Foster1 год назад

Just happy not watching them do rondos

Фото профиля Craig Morraies
Craig Morraies1 год назад

@chongy_13

Фото профиля Mat Field
Mat Field1 год назад

@MUFamilyStand

Фото профиля Pas de nom
Pas de nom1 год назад

Get in the bin, tacticos 🤮 look they used our ipads😂

Фото профиля Mukesh
Mukesh1 год назад

Hopefully this training can be replicated on match day . Bennie McCarthy mentioned that whatever they did when training was “lost” on match day

Похожие видео

Author of Designing Data-Intensive Applications, Martin Kleppmann, on why scaling down is just as challenging as scaling up: “Part of what is interesting about modern cloud services, and backend services in general, is how they've introduced the idea of horizontal scalability and shared nothing systems. We can build systems that are able to cope with very high load, even if the individual components are just fairly cheap commodity machines. The scalability story is not just scaling up, but scaling down as well. How do you run a service in such a way that if it has a very small amount of load, it's really cheap to run? That's sort of the same question as ‘how do you continue running a service if it has a very high load?’ Generally, you want the cost and the computing capacity to be roughly proportional to the load that you have and at the low end, that means actually being able to scale down to something that is extremely cheap to run. That's not necessarily a given. It's something that is hard with on-premises software because if you've got a physical machine, that is a unit of deployment. Yes, you could carve it up into two dozen virtual machines, but it still requires some sort of resource allocation. And so, part of what's interesting about some serverless systems, is their ability to scale down and say ‘okay, if you're going to handle just three requests per day, that's just fine as well’”.

The Pragmatic Engineer

21,239 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад