Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Some subnets have been collecting $TAO emissions for work that never happened. Not a bug. Not a hack. A strategy the old system could not see, because its memory was built to forget. This week Bittensor shipped the upgrade that ends it. One formula change, and now emission follows... two things only: real price and real miners. Fake the second one and your share goes to zero the very next tempo. Most people will read the release notes and see math. What actually shipped is a purge, and the subnets on the wrong side of it are already visible if you know which variable to watch. I broke the whole mechanism down in plain language below. The salary and the drug test. The empty factory still cashing subsidies. The credit card cycle that just got cancelled. Emissions used to reward whoever gamed the meter. Now they reward whoever builds. That reprices every subnet on the network. You will want to find this post later.show more

2xnmore

45,344 subscribers

10,553 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Most people tracking $TAO are watching the price chart. The ones who are actually ahead are watching the subnets. Here is why subnet growth is the real TAO price driver, and why almost nobody is talking about it correctly. $TAO does not work like most tokens. The price is not driven by speculation alone. It is driven by real network usage tied to AI computing output. Miners, validators, and developers earn TAO based on performance. The more useful the AI output, the more the network rewards it. Subnets are where that output gets produced. Each subnet is a specialised AI marketplace running inside the Bittensor network. One subnet handles language processing. Another handles predictive modelling. Another handles data indexing. Each one is a separate competitive market where AI models compete to produce the best output and earn TAO rewards for doing so. Here is what that means for price: Every new subnet that launches creates a new source of TAO demand. Developers who want to participate need TAO. Users who want access need TAO. Validators who want to secure the subnet need TAO. The token is not optional infrastructure. It is the entry ticket and the reward mechanism for every subnet that runs on the network. Right now, the subnet ecosystem is approaching $1.5 billion in cumulative value. Nearly 70 percent of TAO supply is already staked. Post-halving emissions sit at 3,600 TAO per day, down from 7,200. Supply tightening. Subnet demand is growing. Institutional custody is now live through BitGo and Yuma. Forecasts suggest the subnet ecosystem matures between 2026 and 2028, transitioning from infrastructure development into enterprise adoption. That transition is when decentralised AI stops being a thesis and starts being a cost efficiency argument that businesses make against centralised AI providers. When that argument lands at scale, every subnet on Bittensor becomes a revenue-generating node. Every new enterprise use case becomes a new source of TAO demand. The analysts watching the price chart are looking at the output of this system. The analysts watching subnet growth are looking at the input. Grayscale filed the ETF. BitGo opened the institutional door. The subnets are doing the actual work. Watch the subnets. Who else is tracking this layer?

Most people tracking $TAO are watching the price chart. The ones who are actually ahead are watching the subnets. Here is why subnet growth is the real TAO price driver, and why almost nobody is talking about it correctly. $TAO does not work like most tokens. The price is not driven by speculation alone. It is driven by real network usage tied to AI computing output. Miners, validators, and developers earn TAO based on performance. The more useful the AI output, the more the network rewards it. Subnets are where that output gets produced. Each subnet is a specialised AI marketplace running inside the Bittensor network. One subnet handles language processing. Another handles predictive modelling. Another handles data indexing. Each one is a separate competitive market where AI models compete to produce the best output and earn TAO rewards for doing so. Here is what that means for price: Every new subnet that launches creates a new source of TAO demand. Developers who want to participate need TAO. Users who want access need TAO. Validators who want to secure the subnet need TAO. The token is not optional infrastructure. It is the entry ticket and the reward mechanism for every subnet that runs on the network. Right now, the subnet ecosystem is approaching $1.5 billion in cumulative value. Nearly 70 percent of TAO supply is already staked. Post-halving emissions sit at 3,600 TAO per day, down from 7,200. Supply tightening. Subnet demand is growing. Institutional custody is now live through BitGo and Yuma. Forecasts suggest the subnet ecosystem matures between 2026 and 2028, transitioning from infrastructure development into enterprise adoption. That transition is when decentralised AI stops being a thesis and starts being a cost efficiency argument that businesses make against centralised AI providers. When that argument lands at scale, every subnet on Bittensor becomes a revenue-generating node. Every new enterprise use case becomes a new source of TAO demand. The analysts watching the price chart are looking at the output of this system. The analysts watching subnet growth are looking at the input. Grayscale filed the ETF. BitGo opened the institutional door. The subnets are doing the actual work. Watch the subnets. Who else is tracking this layer?

2xnmore

11,997 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Someone just stole from 37,000 $TAO holders and walked away clean. Not because they broke a rule. Because no rule existed to stop them. That changes today. Here is what happened. Covenant AI ran one of the most watched subnets on Bittensor. On April 10, the founder sold their entire position and disappeared. No warning. No announcement. No on-chain signal. By the time holders found out, the price had already moved against them. This was not a hack. This was not a bug. This was a founder legally exiting into their own community with zero accountability. Bittensor just closed that door permanently. The Conviction upgrade is live on mainnet today. Every emission a subnet owner earns now locks automatically the moment it arrives. They cannot touch it immediately. If they want to exit they must submit a public unlock transaction on-chain. Visible to every single person on the network the second it is submitted. Then the clock starts. 30 days before 63% of their position becomes spendable. 90 days before 95% is accessible. You now have a month of warning before the first dollar of sell pressure hits. A silent exit is no longer possible. The founder has to tell you they are leaving before they can leave. And it goes further. Any holder can now lock their tokens toward a different address they believe would run the subnet better. The address with the most locked support behind it becomes eligible to take over entirely. Bad owners can be replaced by the community before they do damage. Before today, subnet investing had one risk nobody could price. The person running it could vanish overnight, and you would never see it coming. That risk has been removed from the equation. Skin in the game used to be a promise. Now, it is a number on a block explorer that every holder can verify in real time. The people who understand what accountable infrastructure means for the value of $TAO will not need to explain themselves later. This is still early.

Someone just stole from 37,000 $TAO holders and walked away clean. Not because they broke a rule. Because no rule existed to stop them. That changes today. Here is what happened. Covenant AI ran one of the most watched subnets on Bittensor. On April 10, the founder sold their entire position and disappeared. No warning. No announcement. No on-chain signal. By the time holders found out, the price had already moved against them. This was not a hack. This was not a bug. This was a founder legally exiting into their own community with zero accountability. Bittensor just closed that door permanently. The Conviction upgrade is live on mainnet today. Every emission a subnet owner earns now locks automatically the moment it arrives. They cannot touch it immediately. If they want to exit they must submit a public unlock transaction on-chain. Visible to every single person on the network the second it is submitted. Then the clock starts. 30 days before 63% of their position becomes spendable. 90 days before 95% is accessible. You now have a month of warning before the first dollar of sell pressure hits. A silent exit is no longer possible. The founder has to tell you they are leaving before they can leave. And it goes further. Any holder can now lock their tokens toward a different address they believe would run the subnet better. The address with the most locked support behind it becomes eligible to take over entirely. Bad owners can be replaced by the community before they do damage. Before today, subnet investing had one risk nobody could price. The person running it could vanish overnight, and you would never see it coming. That risk has been removed from the equation. Skin in the game used to be a promise. Now, it is a number on a block explorer that every holder can verify in real time. The people who understand what accountable infrastructure means for the value of $TAO will not need to explain themselves later. This is still early.

2xnmore

19,549 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Jason Calacanis just told his friends to buy one $TAO and not to blame him if it goes to zero. Most people read that as a gamble. It is the most honest AI crypto take on the timeline right now. One TAO trades around $190 today. That is not a position; that's tuition. You are not buying it to flip it. You are buying it to force yourself to learn how the first real market for decentralised AI actually works. Bittensor caps at 21M coins. Same scarcity math as Bitcoin. But Andy said the quiet part out loud. 21M is just the surface. The cap is the surface. The network underneath is the depth. 128 subnets competing for emissions. Ridges outscoring funded labs on real engineering benchmarks. Chutes serving inference the network actually pays for. Barry Silbert is positioned. Jason is positioned. They are not trading a chart. They are buying a seat at a five year show. Own a single coin, read the docs, and watch the network before you watch the price. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price. Save this. You will want it when the show starts.

Jason Calacanis just told his friends to buy one $TAO and not to blame him if it goes to zero. Most people read that as a gamble. It is the most honest AI crypto take on the timeline right now. One TAO trades around $190 today. That is not a position; that's tuition. You are not buying it to flip it. You are buying it to force yourself to learn how the first real market for decentralised AI actually works. Bittensor caps at 21M coins. Same scarcity math as Bitcoin. But Andy said the quiet part out loud. 21M is just the surface. The cap is the surface. The network underneath is the depth. 128 subnets competing for emissions. Ridges outscoring funded labs on real engineering benchmarks. Chutes serving inference the network actually pays for. Barry Silbert is positioned. Jason is positioned. They are not trading a chart. They are buying a seat at a five year show. Own a single coin, read the docs, and watch the network before you watch the price. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price. Save this. You will want it when the show starts.

2xnmore

20,807 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

$TAO just reclaimed the #1 AI crypto spot. Most people saw the headline. Almost nobody understands what it means for the price. Here is the data. $NEAR built real infrastructure. Partnerships. Developer activity. A legitimate ecosystem. $TAO just walked past it anyway. Not because of hype. Because Bittensor is the only AI crypto with a functioning marketplace for machine intelligence where supply, demand, and price discovery are all happening on-chain right now. That is not a roadmap. That is a live network. The numbers. 120+ subnets running today. $1.4B+ total ecosystem value. Chutes AI subnet: 150B+ tokens per day. Grayscale GTAO Trust: already live. Single subnet listed on the marketplace at $970,000 asking price. Subnets are becoming assets. The market is starting to price that. What the emission data is telling you. Emission rate is the network's vote on where the most valuable work is being done. When a subnet gains emission share, the collective stake-weighted intelligence of the network has decided that subnet's output is worth more of the TAO supply. Chutes AI gaining emissions while processing 150B tokens daily is not a coincidence. The network is directing capital toward proven output before any headline announces it. Why mainstream money changes everything. James Altucher just launched bluetao. ai, a TAO-powered ChatGPT alternative built directly on Bittensor subnets. He did not just buy the token. He built a product on the network. Products built on a network create structural demand for the native asset. That is how every successful L1 cycle has worked. Bittensor is now getting that builder activity from outside the crypto native world. That is a different signal from a price target tweet. Why $TAO is structurally different. Most AI tokens are betting their chain becomes the preferred environment for AI development. $TAO is not betting on becoming infrastructure. It already is. 120+ subnets running. Miners competing. Validators setting weights. Alpha tokens being priced in real time. The difference between $TAO and every other AI crypto is the difference between a city under construction and a city people are already living in. Van de Poppe said $1,000 to $2,000 in 12 months. He gave you the narrative. The subnet emission data is the mechanism he did not explain. Now you have both. $TAO at $313 with a $3.42B market cap is still early relative to what this network is actually processing. Centralised AI infrastructure companies are valued at hundreds of billions for processing far less novel work than a decentralised intelligence marketplace running 120+ competing subnets simultaneously. The repricing has not happened yet. The subnet marketplace listing at $970,000 is telling you something the price has not caught up to yet.

$TAO just reclaimed the #1 AI crypto spot. Most people saw the headline. Almost nobody understands what it means for the price. Here is the data. $NEAR built real infrastructure. Partnerships. Developer activity. A legitimate ecosystem. $TAO just walked past it anyway. Not because of hype. Because Bittensor is the only AI crypto with a functioning marketplace for machine intelligence where supply, demand, and price discovery are all happening on-chain right now. That is not a roadmap. That is a live network. The numbers. 120+ subnets running today. $1.4B+ total ecosystem value. Chutes AI subnet: 150B+ tokens per day. Grayscale GTAO Trust: already live. Single subnet listed on the marketplace at $970,000 asking price. Subnets are becoming assets. The market is starting to price that. What the emission data is telling you. Emission rate is the network's vote on where the most valuable work is being done. When a subnet gains emission share, the collective stake-weighted intelligence of the network has decided that subnet's output is worth more of the TAO supply. Chutes AI gaining emissions while processing 150B tokens daily is not a coincidence. The network is directing capital toward proven output before any headline announces it. Why mainstream money changes everything. James Altucher just launched bluetao. ai, a TAO-powered ChatGPT alternative built directly on Bittensor subnets. He did not just buy the token. He built a product on the network. Products built on a network create structural demand for the native asset. That is how every successful L1 cycle has worked. Bittensor is now getting that builder activity from outside the crypto native world. That is a different signal from a price target tweet. Why $TAO is structurally different. Most AI tokens are betting their chain becomes the preferred environment for AI development. $TAO is not betting on becoming infrastructure. It already is. 120+ subnets running. Miners competing. Validators setting weights. Alpha tokens being priced in real time. The difference between $TAO and every other AI crypto is the difference between a city under construction and a city people are already living in. Van de Poppe said $1,000 to $2,000 in 12 months. He gave you the narrative. The subnet emission data is the mechanism he did not explain. Now you have both. $TAO at $313 with a $3.42B market cap is still early relative to what this network is actually processing. Centralised AI infrastructure companies are valued at hundreds of billions for processing far less novel work than a decentralised intelligence marketplace running 120+ competing subnets simultaneously. The repricing has not happened yet. The subnet marketplace listing at $970,000 is telling you something the price has not caught up to yet.

2xnmore

12,150 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

$TAO is still being priced like a narrative token. It is not. Right now, the network is running 128 live subnets. Every single one of them settles in and out of TAO. That is not a side feature. That is the entire economic design. When Ridges competes with or outperforms funded labs on real engineering benchmarks, value flows back to TAO. When Chutes serves paid inference, value flows back to TAO. When a new subnet launches and miners compete for emissions, value flows back to TAO. There is no other chain where the success of the applications automatically compounds into the base asset this cleanly. Meanwhile, the market keeps treating every quiet week as proof the thesis is dead. Look at the actual structure: - 21 million hard cap - First halving already done - Daily emissions cut in half permanently - Subnet tokens now appearing on major exchange roadmaps - Barry Silbert, Jason Calacanis, and Grayscale all positioned on the same side of the table This is not a “maybe one day” story. This is a live incentive machine that has already survived its first supply shock and is still producing intelligence that closed labs have to pay real money to match. The people staring at the daily candle are waiting for permission. The people reading the subnet economics already know what the next leg looks like. The people who understood this before the repricing will not need to explain their positioning later.

$TAO is still being priced like a narrative token. It is not. Right now, the network is running 128 live subnets. Every single one of them settles in and out of TAO. That is not a side feature. That is the entire economic design. When Ridges competes with or outperforms funded labs on real engineering benchmarks, value flows back to TAO. When Chutes serves paid inference, value flows back to TAO. When a new subnet launches and miners compete for emissions, value flows back to TAO. There is no other chain where the success of the applications automatically compounds into the base asset this cleanly. Meanwhile, the market keeps treating every quiet week as proof the thesis is dead. Look at the actual structure: - 21 million hard cap - First halving already done - Daily emissions cut in half permanently - Subnet tokens now appearing on major exchange roadmaps - Barry Silbert, Jason Calacanis, and Grayscale all positioned on the same side of the table This is not a “maybe one day” story. This is a live incentive machine that has already survived its first supply shock and is still producing intelligence that closed labs have to pay real money to match. The people staring at the daily candle are waiting for permission. The people reading the subnet economics already know what the next leg looks like. The people who understood this before the repricing will not need to explain their positioning later.

2xnmore

15,082 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Most $TAO holders are flying blind. They bought the token. They watched the price. They read the threads. But they have never opened the one tool that shows them everything happening inside the Bittensor network in real time. It is called Taostats. It is free. And after reading this, you will never look at $TAO the same way again. Here is exactly how to use it. Step 1: Start at the Subnets page. This is the heartbeat of the entire network. Every subnet running on Bittensor is listed here with: - its current emission rate - the number of active miners and validators - real-time performance data The emission rate is the most important number on this page. It tells you exactly how much TAO is flowing into each subnet every block. High emission means the network is directing significant resources toward that subnet's commodity. Low emission means the market has not yet recognised its value, or the subnet has not yet proven itself. Watch which subnets are gaining emission share over time. That movement tells you where the network believes the most valuable work is being done, before any headline announces it. Step 2: Use the Subnet pages to go deeper. Click any subnet, and you enter a complete dashboard for that individual market. - The TradingView chart shows you the alpha token price history for that subnet. Alpha tokens are the subnet-specific tokens that sit inside TAO's broader economy. Their price relative to TAO tells you how the market is valuing that subnet's specific commodity. - The Metagraph is the full list of every miner and validator currently active in the subnet: their UID, their stake, their trust score, their emission share. This is the raw intelligence layer. The miners consistently earning the most emissions are producing the work the validators collectively agree is the most valuable. - The Sentiment Index gives you a real-time community temperature reading on each subnet. Not price sentiment. Ecosystem sentiment. Whether the participants building inside the subnet believe it is healthy and improving. Step 3: Check Validators before you stake anything. This is the step most people skip and regret. The Validators page on Taostats shows you the performance history of every validator on the network: their VTrust score, their emission consistency, and their weight-setting behaviour across subnets. VTrust is the metric that matters most. It measures how closely a validator's judgments align with the honest stake-weighted majority across the network. High VTrust means the validator is doing genuine work and being rewarded for it. Low VTrust means the validator is either lazy, copying other validators' weights, or attempting to manipulate the system. When you delegate your TAO to a validator, you are trusting them with your emissions. Taostats shows you exactly which validators have earned that trust over time, and which ones have not. Never stake blind again. Step 4: Use the Blockchain explorer to track real movement. The Blockchain section of Taostats logs every transfer, every staking transaction, and every extrinsic called on the Bittensor chain in real time. This is where you track what wallets are actually doing: - Large staking transactions from unknown addresses - Subnet registration events that signal a new market is about to go live - Neuron registration burns that show demand for participation in a specific subnet is accelerating The people who read on-chain data before the narrative catches up to it are the ones who position correctly before the crowd notices the move. Step 5: Track your own portfolio inside the Dashboard. Connect your coldkey address, and Taostats builds you a complete portfolio view: - Your TAO balance - Your staking positions - Your delegation returns - Your yield over time The yield calculator is particularly useful. It shows you the actual return you are generating from your staking position in real TAO terms, not in percentage estimates that assume conditions that may not hold. If your yield is lower than the network average for your validator tier, Taostats shows you that too. Switching validators takes one transaction. The data to make that decision intelligently is right in front of you. The bigger picture. Most people holding $TAO are making decisions based on price charts and social media sentiment. Both of those inputs are downstream of what is actually happening inside the network. Subnet emission shifts. Validator VTrust changes. On-chain registration events. Neuron burn rates. Alpha token price movements relative to TAO. All of it is live on Taostats right now. All of it is free. All of it tells you something the price chart cannot. The investors who understand Bittensor at the data layer will always be positioned ahead of the investors who understand it at the narrative layer. Taostats is the data layer. Bookmark it. Open it daily. The network is telling you exactly what it is doing if you know where to look.

Most $TAO holders are flying blind. They bought the token. They watched the price. They read the threads. But they have never opened the one tool that shows them everything happening inside the Bittensor network in real time. It is called Taostats. It is free. And after reading this, you will never look at $TAO the same way again. Here is exactly how to use it. Step 1: Start at the Subnets page. This is the heartbeat of the entire network. Every subnet running on Bittensor is listed here with: - its current emission rate - the number of active miners and validators - real-time performance data The emission rate is the most important number on this page. It tells you exactly how much TAO is flowing into each subnet every block. High emission means the network is directing significant resources toward that subnet's commodity. Low emission means the market has not yet recognised its value, or the subnet has not yet proven itself. Watch which subnets are gaining emission share over time. That movement tells you where the network believes the most valuable work is being done, before any headline announces it. Step 2: Use the Subnet pages to go deeper. Click any subnet, and you enter a complete dashboard for that individual market. - The TradingView chart shows you the alpha token price history for that subnet. Alpha tokens are the subnet-specific tokens that sit inside TAO's broader economy. Their price relative to TAO tells you how the market is valuing that subnet's specific commodity. - The Metagraph is the full list of every miner and validator currently active in the subnet: their UID, their stake, their trust score, their emission share. This is the raw intelligence layer. The miners consistently earning the most emissions are producing the work the validators collectively agree is the most valuable. - The Sentiment Index gives you a real-time community temperature reading on each subnet. Not price sentiment. Ecosystem sentiment. Whether the participants building inside the subnet believe it is healthy and improving. Step 3: Check Validators before you stake anything. This is the step most people skip and regret. The Validators page on Taostats shows you the performance history of every validator on the network: their VTrust score, their emission consistency, and their weight-setting behaviour across subnets. VTrust is the metric that matters most. It measures how closely a validator's judgments align with the honest stake-weighted majority across the network. High VTrust means the validator is doing genuine work and being rewarded for it. Low VTrust means the validator is either lazy, copying other validators' weights, or attempting to manipulate the system. When you delegate your TAO to a validator, you are trusting them with your emissions. Taostats shows you exactly which validators have earned that trust over time, and which ones have not. Never stake blind again. Step 4: Use the Blockchain explorer to track real movement. The Blockchain section of Taostats logs every transfer, every staking transaction, and every extrinsic called on the Bittensor chain in real time. This is where you track what wallets are actually doing: - Large staking transactions from unknown addresses - Subnet registration events that signal a new market is about to go live - Neuron registration burns that show demand for participation in a specific subnet is accelerating The people who read on-chain data before the narrative catches up to it are the ones who position correctly before the crowd notices the move. Step 5: Track your own portfolio inside the Dashboard. Connect your coldkey address, and Taostats builds you a complete portfolio view: - Your TAO balance - Your staking positions - Your delegation returns - Your yield over time The yield calculator is particularly useful. It shows you the actual return you are generating from your staking position in real TAO terms, not in percentage estimates that assume conditions that may not hold. If your yield is lower than the network average for your validator tier, Taostats shows you that too. Switching validators takes one transaction. The data to make that decision intelligently is right in front of you. The bigger picture. Most people holding $TAO are making decisions based on price charts and social media sentiment. Both of those inputs are downstream of what is actually happening inside the network. Subnet emission shifts. Validator VTrust changes. On-chain registration events. Neuron burn rates. Alpha token price movements relative to TAO. All of it is live on Taostats right now. All of it is free. All of it tells you something the price chart cannot. The investors who understand Bittensor at the data layer will always be positioned ahead of the investors who understand it at the narrative layer. Taostats is the data layer. Bookmark it. Open it daily. The network is telling you exactly what it is doing if you know where to look.

2xnmore

162,152 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

When Barry Silbert and Jason Calacanis land on the same thesis in the same week, that is not two opinions. That is a signal forming in public. But read what Jason actually said, because most people will miss it. Open competition vetted by validators is not a slogan on Bittensor. It is the mechanism itself. And it already has a receipt. Subnet 62. Ridges beat Cognition Labs on SWE-bench. An open decentralised network outscored a closed lab on the exact benchmark the closed labs use to prove they are winning. That is the thesis validating itself before the price caught up. $TAO is hard capped at 21M like Bitcoin. Emissions already halved. The institutions quoting each other about it right now are not early. They are on time. The people still asking what Bittensor does are the ones who buy the news the docs told you six months ago. Read the docs before the price.

When Barry Silbert and Jason Calacanis land on the same thesis in the same week, that is not two opinions. That is a signal forming in public. But read what Jason actually said, because most people will miss it. Open competition vetted by validators is not a slogan on Bittensor. It is the mechanism itself. And it already has a receipt. Subnet 62. Ridges beat Cognition Labs on SWE-bench. An open decentralised network outscored a closed lab on the exact benchmark the closed labs use to prove they are winning. That is the thesis validating itself before the price caught up. $TAO is hard capped at 21M like Bitcoin. Emissions already halved. The institutions quoting each other about it right now are not early. They are on time. The people still asking what Bittensor does are the ones who buy the news the docs told you six months ago. Read the docs before the price.

2xnmore

25,726 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Most $TAO holders will never mine a single block. They are too busy watching charts while a small group earns real emissions every block by actually producing intelligence on subnets. The network does not reward watchers. It rewards producers. This is the complete no-fluff guide to becoming one of them. Everything you need. Nothing you do not. Subnet selection. The one decision that determines everything before you spend a single TAO. Cold and hotkey setup. The wallet structure most people get wrong before they even start. Registration. What the burn cost actually means and how to avoid paying too much. Immunity periods. The 13.7 hour window that separates prepared miners from deregistered ones. Axon Publishing. The step most beginners skip that silently kills their emissions from day one. Auto staking. How serious miners compound every block without lifting a finger. Monitoring. The five numbers that tell you whether your position is safe or about to disappear. Safe migration. How to move machines without losing your UID or your earnings. This is not passive income. This is competitive intelligence production rewarded in real time. If you have the expertise and the hardware, this is how you stop being a spectator. Save this. Study it. Then start. Shoutout DecipheringCrypto for the excellent video. 2xnmore Openτensor Foundaτion

Most $TAO holders will never mine a single block. They are too busy watching charts while a small group earns real emissions every block by actually producing intelligence on subnets. The network does not reward watchers. It rewards producers. This is the complete no-fluff guide to becoming one of them. Everything you need. Nothing you do not. Subnet selection. The one decision that determines everything before you spend a single TAO. Cold and hotkey setup. The wallet structure most people get wrong before they even start. Registration. What the burn cost actually means and how to avoid paying too much. Immunity periods. The 13.7 hour window that separates prepared miners from deregistered ones. Axon Publishing. The step most beginners skip that silently kills their emissions from day one. Auto staking. How serious miners compound every block without lifting a finger. Monitoring. The five numbers that tell you whether your position is safe or about to disappear. Safe migration. How to move machines without losing your UID or your earnings. This is not passive income. This is competitive intelligence production rewarded in real time. If you have the expertise and the hardware, this is how you stop being a spectator. Save this. Study it. Then start. Shoutout DecipheringCrypto for the excellent video. 2xnmore Openτensor Foundaτion

2xnmore

29,968 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

JUST IN: const shares the vision for gamma tokens, usage credits that subnets could fund from a slice of their emissions and spend on compute, inference, and other infrastructure. What this means ⬇️ → Subnets stop being isolated prize pools. They can buy services from one another instead of only competing for $TAO → Gamma is meant to work as a transferable credit, not just another speculative subnet token → Access is designed to reach beyond Bittensor, so outside compute and inference providers could take the same credits → Emissions become operating budget, not only a reward that gets sold into TAO If a subnet can spend what it earns on real work, Bittensor starts looking less like a scoreboard and more like an internal market for intelligence.

JUST IN: const shares the vision for gamma tokens, usage credits that subnets could fund from a slice of their emissions and spend on compute, inference, and other infrastructure. What this means ⬇️ → Subnets stop being isolated prize pools. They can buy services from one another instead of only competing for $TAO → Gamma is meant to work as a transferable credit, not just another speculative subnet token → Access is designed to reach beyond Bittensor, so outside compute and inference providers could take the same credits → Emissions become operating budget, not only a reward that gets sold into TAO If a subnet can spend what it earns on real work, Bittensor starts looking less like a scoreboard and more like an internal market for intelligence.

Intelligence ττ

75,768 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Barry Silbert just gave the clearest explanation of $TAO and Bittensor subnets anyone has ever delivered on a mainstream stage. He said it plain: $TAO powers a decentralized marketplace for intelligence. Anyone can launch a subnet, earn tokens, and monetize real ML work. Open and permissionless. The ultimate hedge against centralized AI. Then Tom Lee made it even simpler. Subnets are the S&P 500 of independent AI startups. Each one competing to deliver value. Each one with its own token. TAO coordinating the entire network underneath. Two sentences, that is the whole thesis. Most people have spent two years trying to explain Bittensor and nobody listened. Two legends made it obvious in under five minutes. This is still early.

Barry Silbert just gave the clearest explanation of $TAO and Bittensor subnets anyone has ever delivered on a mainstream stage. He said it plain: $TAO powers a decentralized marketplace for intelligence. Anyone can launch a subnet, earn tokens, and monetize real ML work. Open and permissionless. The ultimate hedge against centralized AI. Then Tom Lee made it even simpler. Subnets are the S&P 500 of independent AI startups. Each one competing to deliver value. Each one with its own token. TAO coordinating the entire network underneath. Two sentences, that is the whole thesis. Most people have spent two years trying to explain Bittensor and nobody listened. Two legends made it obvious in under five minutes. This is still early.

2xnmore

23,236 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Barry Silbert has been right about one thing his entire career. He finds the asset before the crowd finds the narrative. Bitcoin at $7. Coinbase seed round. Grayscale before the ETF existed. Now he is pointing at $TAO and saying the words he said about Bitcoin in 2012. The subnet flywheel is the part most people are still not understanding. Every token launched on Bittensor trades in and out of TAO. 88 subnets competing to solve real problems. Every winner flows value back to the base layer. That dynamic does not exist on Ethereum. It does not exist on Solana. It only exists here. $500 million in annual TAO emissions available right now as incentives for compute, data, and intelligence providers. At current prices. Watch what that number becomes if price moves. The infrastructure play is early. The narrative is early. The market cap is early. Most people will understand this after the move.

Barry Silbert has been right about one thing his entire career. He finds the asset before the crowd finds the narrative. Bitcoin at $7. Coinbase seed round. Grayscale before the ETF existed. Now he is pointing at $TAO and saying the words he said about Bitcoin in 2012. The subnet flywheel is the part most people are still not understanding. Every token launched on Bittensor trades in and out of TAO. 88 subnets competing to solve real problems. Every winner flows value back to the base layer. That dynamic does not exist on Ethereum. It does not exist on Solana. It only exists here. $500 million in annual TAO emissions available right now as incentives for compute, data, and intelligence providers. At current prices. Watch what that number becomes if price moves. The infrastructure play is early. The narrative is early. The market cap is early. Most people will understand this after the move.

2xnmore

58,439 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Const just said the quiet part out loud. Jacob Steeves, on the new Bittensor meta after v440: "This isn't a handouts game... emission is the finite resource." The Emission Gate just turned that sentence into a rule. Parked subnets no longer get a free drip of $TAO just for existing. Demand now has to clear a bar, sitting around rank 32 today. Clear the bar and you keep nearly everything, plus a share of what the tail just lost. Fall below it and your emission gets throttled toward almost nothing. Here is what that did in the live snapshot: Top 8 subnets: 32.8% → 52.7% of all emission 94 subnets below the bar: 38.4% → 12.5% Effective network size: ~50 → ~22 subnets The old game was hold a slot and collect. The new game is earn your place above the bar or fade. Builders with real products just got cheaper entry. Idle squatters just got an eviction notice. Full map of how the gate works, where the bar sits, and what it means for every role, subnet owner, alpha staker, builder, node runner, is below 👇 Watch Const explain the philosophy in 40 seconds: This is Bittensor choosing meritocracy over welfare.

Const just said the quiet part out loud. Jacob Steeves, on the new Bittensor meta after v440: "This isn't a handouts game... emission is the finite resource." The Emission Gate just turned that sentence into a rule. Parked subnets no longer get a free drip of $TAO just for existing. Demand now has to clear a bar, sitting around rank 32 today. Clear the bar and you keep nearly everything, plus a share of what the tail just lost. Fall below it and your emission gets throttled toward almost nothing. Here is what that did in the live snapshot: Top 8 subnets: 32.8% → 52.7% of all emission 94 subnets below the bar: 38.4% → 12.5% Effective network size: ~50 → ~22 subnets The old game was hold a slot and collect. The new game is earn your place above the bar or fade. Builders with real products just got cheaper entry. Idle squatters just got an eviction notice. Full map of how the gate works, where the bar sits, and what it means for every role, subnet owner, alpha staker, builder, node runner, is below 👇 Watch Const explain the philosophy in 40 seconds: This is Bittensor choosing meritocracy over welfare.

2xnmore

17,949 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Most $TAO holders staking right now are trusting the wrong validators. Not because they are careless. Because nobody explained what the numbers on the Validators page actually mean. There is a tool inside Taostats that shows you exactly which validators are genuinely working and which ones are collecting your emissions without contributing anything to the network. It is free. It is live. And almost nobody is using it correctly. Here is exactly how to read it. Step 1: Understand what Dominance actually measures. Dominance is not popularity. It is not a ranking of which validator is best. It describes a validator's Stake Weight as a percentage of all validator stake weights combined across the network. Stake Weight is calculated as: root stake multiplied by 0.18, plus all alpha staked across subnets converted into TAO. Root stake is deliberately discounted at 18 percent of its face value. Alpha stake carries the full weight. This means a validator with deep subnet-level staking is structurally more powerful than one sitting purely on root, even if their raw TAO numbers look similar on the surface. When you see a validator with rising Dominance over time, it is not just getting more popular. It is getting more alpha stake directed toward it across active subnets. That is a meaningful signal about where serious capital is moving inside the network. Step 2: Check the Take percentage before you delegate anything. Take is the percentage of emissions the validator keeps for itself. Everything above that number flows to you as a nominator. A validator with a 18 percent Take keeps 18 percent of the emissions their position generates and distributes the remainder to stakeholders. A validator with a 50 percent Take is keeping half of what your stake earns. Most people never look at this number before delegating. It is the first number you should check. A high Take is not automatically a red flag if the validator is genuinely performing well and contributing to the network. But a high Take combined with low VTrust in their subnet performance page is the exact combination that should make you move your stake immediately. Step 3: Open the Validator Performance page and find the VTrust score. This is the number most holders never see. VTrust measures how closely a validator's weight assignments align with the honest stake-weighted majority across the network inside each subnet they operate in. Validators are responsible for evaluating miner output and assigning scores. Those scores go into Yuma Consensus and determine which miners earn emissions. A validator doing genuine evaluation work will have weights that align closely with the honest consensus. High VTrust. Consistent emissions. Reliable nominator returns. A validator that is weight copying, meaning they are simply copying the Yuma consensus scores back onto themselves rather than doing real evaluation, will show a flagged return on Taostats. Their nom/24hr/1k TAO score appears in red. This is Taostats telling you directly: this validator is extracting value from the network without contributing to it. When you stake to a weight copying validator, you are funding a free rider. Step 4: Watch the 24hr Nominator Change column. This number moves fast and it tells you something before any other signal does. A validator losing nominators over consecutive days is a validator that informed stakers are quietly leaving. A validator gaining nominators rapidly while their VTrust is healthy is a validator attracting attention for the right reasons. The 24hr column is the on-chain version of sentiment before sentiment becomes a narrative on social media. Step 5: Check Active subnets alongside Total Weight. Active tells you the number of subnets where the validator has a parent or child hotkey running. A validator with high Total Weight but low Active subnets is concentrated. They are running a specific strategy in specific markets. A validator with broad Active coverage across many subnets is building a wider surface area for emissions and is more exposed to the overall network performance rather than any single subnet cycle. Neither is inherently better. But knowing which type of validator you are delegating to tells you what you are actually betting on when you stake. Step 6: Check the Weight Change column over time. Total Weight is a snapshot. Weight Change is momentum. A validator with stable or growing Total Weight over consecutive days is attracting net new stake consistently. A validator with declining Weight Change is losing stake faster than it is gaining it. Most people look at the current number. The people positioning correctly are watching which direction the number is moving and how fast. The difference between a good validator and a dangerous one is not obvious from the outside. It is not the name. It is not the size. It is the VTrust score, the Take percentage, the nominator trend, and whether Taostats is showing their return in red or not. Every one of those signals is sitting on the Validators page right now. Free. Live. Updated every block. The investors who read the data layer before the narrative layer will not need to explain their staking decisions later. Open Taostats tonight. You will want to find this post when you do.

Most $TAO holders staking right now are trusting the wrong validators. Not because they are careless. Because nobody explained what the numbers on the Validators page actually mean. There is a tool inside Taostats that shows you exactly which validators are genuinely working and which ones are collecting your emissions without contributing anything to the network. It is free. It is live. And almost nobody is using it correctly. Here is exactly how to read it. Step 1: Understand what Dominance actually measures. Dominance is not popularity. It is not a ranking of which validator is best. It describes a validator's Stake Weight as a percentage of all validator stake weights combined across the network. Stake Weight is calculated as: root stake multiplied by 0.18, plus all alpha staked across subnets converted into TAO. Root stake is deliberately discounted at 18 percent of its face value. Alpha stake carries the full weight. This means a validator with deep subnet-level staking is structurally more powerful than one sitting purely on root, even if their raw TAO numbers look similar on the surface. When you see a validator with rising Dominance over time, it is not just getting more popular. It is getting more alpha stake directed toward it across active subnets. That is a meaningful signal about where serious capital is moving inside the network. Step 2: Check the Take percentage before you delegate anything. Take is the percentage of emissions the validator keeps for itself. Everything above that number flows to you as a nominator. A validator with a 18 percent Take keeps 18 percent of the emissions their position generates and distributes the remainder to stakeholders. A validator with a 50 percent Take is keeping half of what your stake earns. Most people never look at this number before delegating. It is the first number you should check. A high Take is not automatically a red flag if the validator is genuinely performing well and contributing to the network. But a high Take combined with low VTrust in their subnet performance page is the exact combination that should make you move your stake immediately. Step 3: Open the Validator Performance page and find the VTrust score. This is the number most holders never see. VTrust measures how closely a validator's weight assignments align with the honest stake-weighted majority across the network inside each subnet they operate in. Validators are responsible for evaluating miner output and assigning scores. Those scores go into Yuma Consensus and determine which miners earn emissions. A validator doing genuine evaluation work will have weights that align closely with the honest consensus. High VTrust. Consistent emissions. Reliable nominator returns. A validator that is weight copying, meaning they are simply copying the Yuma consensus scores back onto themselves rather than doing real evaluation, will show a flagged return on Taostats. Their nom/24hr/1k TAO score appears in red. This is Taostats telling you directly: this validator is extracting value from the network without contributing to it. When you stake to a weight copying validator, you are funding a free rider. Step 4: Watch the 24hr Nominator Change column. This number moves fast and it tells you something before any other signal does. A validator losing nominators over consecutive days is a validator that informed stakers are quietly leaving. A validator gaining nominators rapidly while their VTrust is healthy is a validator attracting attention for the right reasons. The 24hr column is the on-chain version of sentiment before sentiment becomes a narrative on social media. Step 5: Check Active subnets alongside Total Weight. Active tells you the number of subnets where the validator has a parent or child hotkey running. A validator with high Total Weight but low Active subnets is concentrated. They are running a specific strategy in specific markets. A validator with broad Active coverage across many subnets is building a wider surface area for emissions and is more exposed to the overall network performance rather than any single subnet cycle. Neither is inherently better. But knowing which type of validator you are delegating to tells you what you are actually betting on when you stake. Step 6: Check the Weight Change column over time. Total Weight is a snapshot. Weight Change is momentum. A validator with stable or growing Total Weight over consecutive days is attracting net new stake consistently. A validator with declining Weight Change is losing stake faster than it is gaining it. Most people look at the current number. The people positioning correctly are watching which direction the number is moving and how fast. The difference between a good validator and a dangerous one is not obvious from the outside. It is not the name. It is not the size. It is the VTrust score, the Take percentage, the nominator trend, and whether Taostats is showing their return in red or not. Every one of those signals is sitting on the Validators page right now. Free. Live. Updated every block. The investors who read the data layer before the narrative layer will not need to explain their staking decisions later. Open Taostats tonight. You will want to find this post when you do.

2xnmore

11,771 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

$TAO isn't dead. They called it dead at $300. It's at $200 and they're calling it dead again. Here is what the chart is not showing you: $2.2B market cap. $200M+ in 24-hour volume. 11M circulating supply with the halving already executed. 67% of supply staked and locked. Emissions cut in half. 7,200 $TAO per day down to 3,600. Every new subnet requires buying and staking more $TAO to activate. Subnet token valuations already hit $1.5B earlier this year. Grayscale filed for a spot $TAO ETF. Bitwise filed too. Decision window still open. This is not a dead asset. This is a misread asset. Real decentralized compute. Real supply shock mechanics. Real institutional positioning in the background. While the crowd prices it like a hype token that missed its cycle. The gap between on-chain reality and chart noise is not closing slowly. It just widened again. The people calling $TAO dead right now will be explaining themselves when the next catalyst hits. The people who read the docs are already accumulating. Screenshot this. Come back in 3 months. The market still has not priced this in.

$TAO isn't dead. They called it dead at $300. It's at $200 and they're calling it dead again. Here is what the chart is not showing you: $2.2B market cap. $200M+ in 24-hour volume. 11M circulating supply with the halving already executed. 67% of supply staked and locked. Emissions cut in half. 7,200 $TAO per day down to 3,600. Every new subnet requires buying and staking more $TAO to activate. Subnet token valuations already hit $1.5B earlier this year. Grayscale filed for a spot $TAO ETF. Bitwise filed too. Decision window still open. This is not a dead asset. This is a misread asset. Real decentralized compute. Real supply shock mechanics. Real institutional positioning in the background. While the crowd prices it like a hype token that missed its cycle. The gap between on-chain reality and chart noise is not closing slowly. It just widened again. The people calling $TAO dead right now will be explaining themselves when the next catalyst hits. The people who read the docs are already accumulating. Screenshot this. Come back in 3 months. The market still has not priced this in.

2xnmore

22,271 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

When you pull up the tuition for a D3 school, the number hits you like a wall. You show your parents. They shake their heads. Someone closes the laptop. And just like that, a school that could have been the perfect fit gets crossed off a list it never even made it onto. That happens every single recruiting cycle. What most families never get to is the part where the sticker price is not the real price. Where financial aid, merit scholarships, and one of the highest discount rates in the country bring that number down to something that actually makes sense. There are athletes on D3 rosters right now from public schools, from towns that are not affluent, from families who almost did not apply because of that first number they saw online. They kept digging. And it changed everything. Every school in the country is also required by law to have a net price calculator on their website. Plug in your GPA and your family's information and you will get a real ballpark number, not the scary one on the homepage. Brant McAdams is the head football coach at Pacific Lutheran Football and this week on the podcast he breaks down recruiting from a head coach's perspective and what families get wrong about D3. Want the full episode? Comment PODCAST and I will send it over.

When you pull up the tuition for a D3 school, the number hits you like a wall. You show your parents. They shake their heads. Someone closes the laptop. And just like that, a school that could have been the perfect fit gets crossed off a list it never even made it onto. That happens every single recruiting cycle. What most families never get to is the part where the sticker price is not the real price. Where financial aid, merit scholarships, and one of the highest discount rates in the country bring that number down to something that actually makes sense. There are athletes on D3 rosters right now from public schools, from towns that are not affluent, from families who almost did not apply because of that first number they saw online. They kept digging. And it changed everything. Every school in the country is also required by law to have a net price calculator on their website. Plug in your GPA and your family's information and you will get a real ballpark number, not the scary one on the homepage. Brant McAdams is the head football coach at Pacific Lutheran Football and this week on the podcast he breaks down recruiting from a head coach's perspective and what families get wrong about D3. Want the full episode? Comment PODCAST and I will send it over.

Nick Lemke, RD | Sports Nutrition for Athletes

40,263 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

$Everyone who chased $TAO at 276 is now watching it in the red and wondering if the move is over. It is not. It is doing the one thing a real breakout is supposed to do. Price ran to 276, then pulled back into 252. That is not weakness. That is the retest. The level that has to hold: 252 That is the 0.382 of this whole leg, and price is sitting right on it. Hold this zone on daily closes and the pullback is just the trend catching its breath. The line under it that still keeps bulls in control: 238 The 0.618 golden pocket. As long as dips get bought between here and there, the higher low structure stays intact and the uptrend is fine. Where it goes if the retest holds: 276, then open air Reclaim the highs and the last overhead from spring is the only thing left in the way. What actually breaks it: 238 A daily close back below it fills the gap toward 214 and turns the whole breakout into a fake. That is the invalidation. Not a red candle. A close under the pocket. Here is the part most people miss. RSI cooled from overbought to the low 60s while price only gave back a fraction of the move. Momentum reset without the trend breaking. That is the healthiest thing a chart can do after a vertical leg. The breakout was the easy part to post. The retest is the part that decides who was actually right.$

Everyone who chased $TAO at 276 is now watching it in the red and wondering if the move is over. It is not. It is doing the one thing a real breakout is supposed to do. Price ran to 276, then pulled back into 252. That is not weakness. That is the retest. The level that has to hold: 252 That is the 0.382 of this whole leg, and price is sitting right on it. Hold this zone on daily closes and the pullback is just the trend catching its breath. The line under it that still keeps bulls in control: 238 The 0.618 golden pocket. As long as dips get bought between here and there, the higher low structure stays intact and the uptrend is fine. Where it goes if the retest holds: 276, then open air Reclaim the highs and the last overhead from spring is the only thing left in the way. What actually breaks it: 238 A daily close back below it fills the gap toward 214 and turns the whole breakout into a fake. That is the invalidation. Not a red candle. A close under the pocket. Here is the part most people miss. RSI cooled from overbought to the low 60s while price only gave back a fraction of the move. Momentum reset without the trend breaking. That is the healthiest thing a chart can do after a vertical leg. The breakout was the easy part to post. The retest is the part that decides who was actually right.

2xnmore

20,821 просмотров • 29 дней назад

"F1 has become very popular. what do you think about this change?" lando: "formula one in 2019 was just a very closed sport. you really didn't see much about the people, the drivers, the mechanics, the engineers. you really just saw the show on tv. you saw the racing, and really that was about it. now formula one is a lot more open. there's a lot more fans in the races and paddock. everything i do now, people see. it's on tv, netflix, different series, youtube, it's on every piece of social media, which allows it to grow in a much better way. and i think you see some more fans now that love the people, they love the drivers. they can understand more and relate more to the personalities of each driver in formula one. because it was a very male dominated sport. now most of my fans actually are female and that's an amazing thing that we're able to attract and bring in a younger generation, because they are the future of formula one, and also more variation. so it's a pleasure to be part of that journey"

"F1 has become very popular. what do you think about this change?" lando: "formula one in 2019 was just a very closed sport. you really didn't see much about the people, the drivers, the mechanics, the engineers. you really just saw the show on tv. you saw the racing, and really that was about it. now formula one is a lot more open. there's a lot more fans in the races and paddock. everything i do now, people see. it's on tv, netflix, different series, youtube, it's on every piece of social media, which allows it to grow in a much better way. and i think you see some more fans now that love the people, they love the drivers. they can understand more and relate more to the personalities of each driver in formula one. because it was a very male dominated sport. now most of my fans actually are female and that's an amazing thing that we're able to attract and bring in a younger generation, because they are the future of formula one, and also more variation. so it's a pleasure to be part of that journey"

ray

28,864 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I pay Claude $20 a month. Most $TAO holders do too. There is a stack you can build in 15 minutes that fixes that completely. It runs on Bittensor. It costs $10. You do not write a single line of code. Here is how every AI chat product actually works under the hood. Three layers. Always three. The model. The brain. GPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM. The inference layer. The GPU that runs the model when you hit send. The interface. The chat box you actually look at. ChatGPT and Claude bundle all three and hand you the result. You cannot change the model. You cannot change the inference. The interface is non-negotiable. Every prompt you type goes to a server run by a private company whose terms of service can quietly change next month. The anti-ChatGPT move is to pick each layer yourself. This is where $TAO comes in. Chutes is Subnet 64 on Bittensor. It is the inference layer. Open source models like DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, and Llama get served by a global network of miner-operated GPUs. Validators score the output quality. The best inference wins the emissions. You hit send. A miner somewhere runs your prompt. You get the answer back. The TAO you hold is in part paying for the GPU you just used. The basic stack is one URL. chutes. ai/chat No account. No API key. No setup. Switch models mid-conversation. Web search built in. Image generation. File uploads. Free. The advanced stack is Chutes plus TypingMind. One-time license. No recurring fee. Plugins, agents, custom personas, a prompt library you build over months. Full model switching between Chutes, OpenAI, and Anthropic from the same window. Total cost: $10 a month to Chutes for inference. That $10 buys you $50 in actual usage. But here is the signal most people missed inside this story. Chutes ran a free tier until February. Then they killed it. Then they raised the minimum to $10 in May. Most people saw that as bad news. It is the opposite. Free things on the internet do not last. Real products do. Chutes is becoming a real product. A subnet that generates actual revenue from actual users paying actual money for actual AI inference. That is what $43 million in Q1 network revenue looks like at the individual subnet level. And there is one more thing ChatGPT and Claude cannot offer that Chutes already has. Trusted Execution Environments. Your prompt gets encrypted on your device, shipped to a confidential compute GPU, and the lock only breaks inside the chip. The miner running the model physically cannot read your prompt. ChatGPT cannot promise that. Claude cannot promise that. Bittensor already built it. You are holding a network where the subnets are generating real revenue, shipping real privacy infrastructure, and replacing $20 a month centralised subscriptions with $10 a month decentralised inference. The people who use the product always understand the investment better than the people who only watch the price.

I pay Claude $20 a month. Most $TAO holders do too. There is a stack you can build in 15 minutes that fixes that completely. It runs on Bittensor. It costs $10. You do not write a single line of code. Here is how every AI chat product actually works under the hood. Three layers. Always three. The model. The brain. GPT, Claude, DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM. The inference layer. The GPU that runs the model when you hit send. The interface. The chat box you actually look at. ChatGPT and Claude bundle all three and hand you the result. You cannot change the model. You cannot change the inference. The interface is non-negotiable. Every prompt you type goes to a server run by a private company whose terms of service can quietly change next month. The anti-ChatGPT move is to pick each layer yourself. This is where $TAO comes in. Chutes is Subnet 64 on Bittensor. It is the inference layer. Open source models like DeepSeek, Kimi, GLM, and Llama get served by a global network of miner-operated GPUs. Validators score the output quality. The best inference wins the emissions. You hit send. A miner somewhere runs your prompt. You get the answer back. The TAO you hold is in part paying for the GPU you just used. The basic stack is one URL. chutes. ai/chat No account. No API key. No setup. Switch models mid-conversation. Web search built in. Image generation. File uploads. Free. The advanced stack is Chutes plus TypingMind. One-time license. No recurring fee. Plugins, agents, custom personas, a prompt library you build over months. Full model switching between Chutes, OpenAI, and Anthropic from the same window. Total cost: $10 a month to Chutes for inference. That $10 buys you $50 in actual usage. But here is the signal most people missed inside this story. Chutes ran a free tier until February. Then they killed it. Then they raised the minimum to $10 in May. Most people saw that as bad news. It is the opposite. Free things on the internet do not last. Real products do. Chutes is becoming a real product. A subnet that generates actual revenue from actual users paying actual money for actual AI inference. That is what $43 million in Q1 network revenue looks like at the individual subnet level. And there is one more thing ChatGPT and Claude cannot offer that Chutes already has. Trusted Execution Environments. Your prompt gets encrypted on your device, shipped to a confidential compute GPU, and the lock only breaks inside the chip. The miner running the model physically cannot read your prompt. ChatGPT cannot promise that. Claude cannot promise that. Bittensor already built it. You are holding a network where the subnets are generating real revenue, shipping real privacy infrastructure, and replacing $20 a month centralised subscriptions with $10 a month decentralised inference. The people who use the product always understand the investment better than the people who only watch the price.

2xnmore

27,216 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 f**king percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

UFO Revolution: S2E3 - 2027 and the Approaching Craft. Is it a Lie? "You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That 100 fking percent is the lie you are going to be told." ~Corbell (Well, I was not expecting this. And right now, I don't know what to think. But we all know it's been hinted at by various folks, including Lue Elizondo. So what's going on?) ~ Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell: "Your government now wants you to know one truth, and that truth is that UFOs are real. They've already done told you. Sometimes, when you want somebody to know a truth, it's so you can set them up to believe a lie, and that's coming. I have zero doubt that lie is coming." Producer: "What is the lie?" Corbell: "Specifically, you want me to say it right now, for real, real? On camera, to be put in the show?" Producer: "Yes." Corbell: "Okay. Problem with that: If we tell the lie before it's told, they can adapt. That wouldn't be wise. I'll tell you privately, but I would really think about if you want to put this in your show. For real. That's a real thing I'm telling you. So, will you think about it before putting it in your show?" Producer: "Absolutely." Corbell: "Okay. So UFOs are real, and they've been here a long time, and that's the truth. But the lie is coming. All indications, like ALL of them, is that that lie is going to be that there is a craft slowly making its way to us here on Earth. And that is the lie they're gonna want you to believe. "It's nuanced, how they explain that, the nature of that threat. But that 100 fking percent is the lie you are going to be told. You even got a date. People been whispering a date for a long time now. I know where that lie comes from. I know, specifically, what document from the 70s initiated the idea of that lie. A classified document. That is the lie you will be told. You're gonna be told that there is a craft on its way to Earth. That's the lie. "Maybe I'm wrong. Hope I'm wrong. I sent you two texts today with a year (Messages showing 2027 are shown on a cell phone). Not from me. Nope, I'm not gonna propagate that lie. I'm not gonna be part of it, I'm not going to say it to the camera. Everybody knows. Just start paying attention. And they'll change the date - especially if they see this - things will change. Because maybe I'm trustworthy, maybe I'm worthy of your trust, maybe I've told you the truth the whole way through it and now and you can verify it. If that's the case, then I'm f**king dangerous. "You've been told the truth about UFOs for a long time now. It's been pretty orchestrated, it's been pretty clear, and it's using people that are telling the truth and wanna tell the truth. Ultimately, they want you to know something. They want you to know UFOs are real. Thank God, we're finally there, we're all there now. They want you to know the truth. But why [do] they want you to know that truth now. I hope I'm wrong, but it's terrifying. Think about it "Maybe it's good to get ahead of it, call it out now, before they do it. I'll be called crazy. That's okay."

Joe Murgia

784,603 просмотров • 1 год назад

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

There was a parent who lost a child to the needle. Not lost to death, which at least lets you grieve and one day stop. Lost to the street. To the years of disappearing, the phone that stops being answered, the front door left unlocked every single night for a decade on the chance the child might finally come through it. And the parent never stopped. Did not move on. Did not decide the child was too far gone. Drove to the worst parts of town to scan the faces under the overpass. Searched for years, going gray with it, burying the hope a hundred times and digging it back up every morning, because a parent does not get to stop loving a child just because the child is lost. And then came the day it finally happened. The child, hollowed out, certain they were beyond all loving, looked up, and there was the parent's face. And neither of them could speak. They just held on, and they wept, the kind of weeping that has years of grief and years of longing pouring out of it at once, the child sobbing the only word they could find, sorry, sorry, and the parent saying the only word that mattered, which was not "where have you been" and not "do you know what you did to me," but only, over and over into their hair, you're home, you're home, you're home. Now understand. That is not just a real story about a parent and a child. That is God, and that is humanity. No one is forgotten by the Father. He did not fold His arms and wait at home for you to crawl back and prove you were worth it. The moment you were lost, He came after you. And the cost He paid to reach the very bottom of your pit was not patience, and it was not effort. It was His Son, sent down below all of it, so there would be no depth where His face was not already waiting for you to find it. So hear this, wherever it finds you. You were never forgotten, not for one second, not in the worst of it. The door has been unlocked every night since the day you left. He is still driving the worst parts of town. He is still scanning the faces under the overpass. He is still weeping over the ones who are certain they have fallen too far to ever come back. And the moment you turn around, you will not hear "where have you been." You will only hear, said over and over into your hair, the one thing that has been true since before the foundation of the world: you're home, you're home, you're home. Stop running. Come home.

Kirk Rollins

21,168 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад