Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Some time ago, flat Earthers were asked for their models, and the majority who provided specifics described a domed flat Earth with the sun and moon as small, local objects under the dome - both about 32 miles in diameter, circling at around 3000 miles high, with stars projected...

142,154 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Hey, Flat Earthers - I have a challenge for you. Late tonight and into early tomorrow morning, we’re going to have a lunar eclipse. Here in the Eastern time zone: • Partial eclipse begins: 10:33 PM EDT • Maximum eclipse: 12:12 AM EDT • Partial eclipse ends: 1:51 AM EDT At maximum, about 96% of the Moon will be inside Earth’s dark shadow. Under the conventional model, this one’s pretty simple: the Earth passes between the Sun and the Moon, and Earth’s shadow sweeps across the Moon. Millions of people across North and South America and parts of Europe and Africa will be able to watch it happen. But you say the Earth is flat. So explain it. And I’ve made this ridiculously easy for you. I built a little interactive model you can play with. You have a Sun. You have a Moon. You have your flat Earth. Move them anywhere you want. Change the size of the Sun and Moon together. Move either one wherever you like. Raise them. Lower them. Move them closer or farther away. Hell, I’ll even let you tilt the flat Earth disc, rotate it, turn it sideways or flip the entire thing over. I’m giving you essentially complete freedom to arrange your flat-Earth system however you think it needs to be arranged. Your challenge is simple: Reproduce what we’re about to observe. Put the Sun, Moon and flat Earth wherever you want and show us how that arrangement produces the Earth’s shadow moving across the Moon the way millions of people will actually see it tonight. No equations required. No appeals to NASA. No CGI excuses. No arguing about photographs. Just geometry. Here’s the model. Show us what you’ve got.

Alex Boge

18,475 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

[Heo Seongbeom Youtube] 260305 Jin - Moon 🌕🌏 (part1) 👨‍🏫It’s a solo song by Jin, and BTS are also preparing for a comeback in March. I’m really looking forward to it. I’m the moon, and you are the Earth. So it becomes a kind of love triangle. Earlier the sea loved the moon, but who does the moon love? The moon loves the Earth. That idea is reflected in this song, so let’s try interpreting it. Since when have the moon and the Earth been together like this? We’ve been together for so long, but when did it start? About 4.51 to 4.53 billion years ago. Scientists figured this out through radioactive isotope analysis, which showed that the Moon is about 4.51 to 4.53 billion years old. “Shining just by existing.” This line is directed at the Earth. But does the Earth actually shine just by existing? No. Because the Earth is a planet and does not produce its own light. If the Earth appears to shine, it’s probably because of artificial lights made by humans. “Can I stay by your side and protect you?” It sounds shy, but in reality the moon can’t help staying there, because it’s bound by gravity. And here we see the main line of the song. “You are my Earth, and to you I’m just a moon. Your small star that lights up your heart.” It’s poetic, but is the moon actually a star? No. Celestial bodies are generally divided into two categories. First, there are stars (stellar bodies). These produce their own light. Second, there are planets. Planets do not produce their own light. Instead, planets usually orbit around a star. The Earth is a planet. From our perspective, the star in our system is the Sun. So when you look at the night sky and see stars, those lights are actually other suns, each producing their own light. But sometimes when you see a particularly bright “star,” it may actually be a planet like Mercury, Venus, Mars, or Jupiter. Then you might ask: if planets don’t produce their own light, why do they shine? Because they reflect sunlight. The Moon also appears bright because it reflects the Sun’s light. #JIN #방탄소년단진 방탄소년단

star_jin

19,468 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

"You can't explain 'day/night, Seasons, Equinox, and 24 hour daylight* on Flat Earth" Sure I can. *not sunlight The concept of day and night on a flat Earth involves several key ideas related to optics and perception rather than the presumption of physical rotation of a spherical Earth. [FlatGPT Explain sunlight and day/night as if to a child] On a flat Earth, the sun is often depicted as moving in a circular path above the plane. This movement is the cause of the cycle of day and night as different areas come into and out of the sun's light. As the sun sets, it's daylight is still visible for a time until it soon vanishes. Atmospheric conditions like refraction and diffraction affect how we perceive the sun's position and are a large contributing factor to the apparent position of the sun or moon. The idea is that the human eye has a limit to its angular resolution, which affects how we perceive distant objects. This limit could cause objects, including the sun, to become unresolvable at a distance, giving the illusion of setting or disappearing beyond the horizon. The perception of the sun moving across the sky and creating day and night is attributed to perspective. As the sun moves away, it appears to set. And as it approaches, it appears to rise. The sun's light only covers only a portion of the Earth at any given time, (this is true in both models) creating areas of light and darkness. Depending upon the season, and the corresponding height of the sun, the distribution of daylight changes accordingly. The areas of light and darkness are directly determined by the sun's position and height relative to the plane. IF you imagine the Earth as a flat plane with the North Pole at its center and Antarctica defining its boundaries, then it could be said the sun revolves around the Earth in a defined, limited, and cyclical path. During the northern hemisphere's summer, the sun moves closer to the Tropic of Cancer, illuminating the northern regions and creating longer days. As the sun moves southward towards the Tropic of Capricorn, it illuminates the southern hemisphere while the northern hemisphere experiences shorter days and cooler temperatures. The sun's continuous cycle and limited journey creates the familiar patterns of day and night, as well as the changing seasons. Due to the restricted reach of the sun's rays, only half of the Earth is illuminated at any given time, while the other half remains in darkness. In summary, day and night on a flat Earth are driven by the sun's cyclical movement around the Earth, illuminating different regions as it travels between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn. The limited reach of the sun's rays causes half of the Earth to be in daylight while the other half experiences night. Don't let math be your undoing after all those years of bragging and condescension globies. A cardioid in parametric representation: 𝑥(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑)⋅cos⁡𝜑 , 𝑦(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑)⋅sin⁡𝜑 , 0≤𝜑<2𝜋 🤷‍♂️ and inpolar coordinates: 𝑟(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑). 😂 Day/night + seasons: Seasons with Chad: Daylight distribution: Daylight Distribution is equal on ANY map projection: The FE Model The Parrot: Just to hammer this home. The Model. The Video and Model Description: Here is an interactive Flat Earth Model that can explain Sunrise, The model is stolen!: Bendy Light: Misunderstanding the model and lightrays: Starman the the claims of heliocentricity: Show me the code: Misunderstanding The sun and the 'distance' These scale ops are because the celestial coord of the sun and moon are expressed as unit vectors. You scale by the distance to get the position of the object in space in the hemispherical view of the observer. It's used when calc the moon phases well, after scaling by using scalar product of moon and sun direction vectors. If anyone makes claims you cannot answer, send them to me. Cant refute anything.

Shane St Pierre

18,951 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth

Ben Wehrman

12,019 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

To the dudes who believe that stars are fiery balls of gas trillions of miles away 🤩 Which somehow lend evindence to the earth being a globe lol 🙄🌎💦 Do you believe the light from these stars took years to reach your eyes 🥴 Do you believe that you could zoom in on an object that is TRILLIONS OF MILES AWAY with a household camera or telescope ✨🔭 Do you believe that the sun is 400 times bigger than the moon but only looks the exact size and distance of the moon because it is coincidentally 400 times further away Do you believe it is a coincidence that the sky is a perfect compass clock and a calendar and that movement of the luminaries correlate with eachother as if they were designed that way 🌖🌞🗓️ Do you believe that the moon is coincidentally “tidal locked” and rotates at a pace so perfectly that we only ever see one side 🌝 Do you believe that we are orbiting the sun at 66,600 miles per hour at a 66.6 degree tilt while hurtling through the universe at 500k mph and rotating at 1k mph 🫨 But you coincidentally never feel it 🧘🏻‍♂️ And the stars never change in the history of the world 😑 Because… If you are in defense of the globe model and outer space vaccum star trek ufo boogeyman space travel nonsense… These are just a small example of the types of mental gymnanstics you are going to have to pull to continue to argue in the defense of your model You might want to take a little closer look at these stars though before you make up your mind 🧐

Rufus_2688

135,449 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren