正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

These international flight time-lapse videos are fantastic for visualizing exactly how the sun moves in its westward circular path above our Flat Earth. This one is from New York 🇺🇸 to Moscow 🇷🇺 during northern Summer (meaning very long days, even 24hrs if you're far enough north) Note how...

benwehrman's profile picture

Ben Wehrman

124,395 subscribers

16,303 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🌞 Wednesday 23 September is the autumn equinox, occurring at 01:05 BST. It's the moment when the Sun crosses the equator heading south, marking the start of astronomical autumn in the Northern Hemisphere. The Sun's position in our sky is constantly changing throughout the year. In summer it climbs high overhead, bringing long days and stronger sunshine. By winter, its path across the sky is much lower, leading to shorter days and weaker sunshine. This video shows how the Sun's path changes through the seasons, all thanks to Earth's 23.44° tilt. ☀️🌍
0:22

🌞 Wednesday 23 September is the autumn equinox, occurring at 01:05 BST. It's the moment when the Sun crosses the equator heading south, marking the start of astronomical autumn in the Northern Hemisphere. The Sun's position in our sky is constantly changing throughout the year. In summer it climbs high overhead, bringing long days and stronger sunshine. By winter, its path across the sky is much lower, leading to shorter days and weaker sunshine. This video shows how the Sun's path changes through the seasons, all thanks to Earth's 23.44° tilt. ☀️🌍

Met Office

35,238 次观看 • 20 天前

Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, on why AI is both a bubble and a revolution at the same time: His answer refuses the binary, laying out why both things can be true at once: "I mean, clearly, it's clearly both, right? It's clearly a bubble and at the same time, it's very interesting and I think it will change society and I think it will change how most skilled jobs get done." But he pushes back on the maximalist framing: "At the same time, I don't think it's as revolutionary as people make it out to be." When asked about artists being angry that AI models were trained on their work without consent, Linus is blunt: "That's reality. Deal with it. That genie is out of the bottle. You're not getting it back. And you're not getting it back whether you are a photographer who's out of work… or you're a programmer that has to learn to deal with a new reality." On programming specifically, he's more optimistic, though he has a sharp caveat about vibe coding: "I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it's going to be a horrible thing to maintain." His conclusion is that programmers aren't going anywhere: "You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result." Linus separates the technology from the noise around it: "I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the whole things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted and there is going to be a crash and it's not… it's going to be ugly."
1:59

Linus Torvalds, creator of Linux, on why AI is both a bubble and a revolution at the same time: His answer refuses the binary, laying out why both things can be true at once: "I mean, clearly, it's clearly both, right? It's clearly a bubble and at the same time, it's very interesting and I think it will change society and I think it will change how most skilled jobs get done." But he pushes back on the maximalist framing: "At the same time, I don't think it's as revolutionary as people make it out to be." When asked about artists being angry that AI models were trained on their work without consent, Linus is blunt: "That's reality. Deal with it. That genie is out of the bottle. You're not getting it back. And you're not getting it back whether you are a photographer who's out of work… or you're a programmer that has to learn to deal with a new reality." On programming specifically, he's more optimistic, though he has a sharp caveat about vibe coding: "I really think that AI will be a tool and it will make people more productive. I think that vibe coding is great for getting into programming. I think it's going to be a horrible thing to maintain." His conclusion is that programmers aren't going anywhere: "You still want to have the people who know how to maintain the end result." Linus separates the technology from the noise around it: "I'm a huge believer in AI. I'm not a huge believer in the whole things going on around AI. I find the marketing and the market to be sick and twisted and there is going to be a crash and it's not… it's going to be ugly."

Big Brain AI

52,726 次观看 • 5 个月前

Most AI tools today are just command-takers. You type, it responds. You click, it executes. There's truly no learning, no memory, no adaptation. You're still doing most of the work. Which is why Miles by Avo on Solana would make so much sense if built well. From what I understand so far, miles learns about you over time, adapts to how you operate, and figures out the tools you struggle to navigate on your own. Less clicking, more conversation, the more you use it, the better it gets at working with you, not just for you. That shift from command-follower to learning companion is bigger than it sounds. It's the difference between a tool and an agent that actually knows you. The second one is Agent Grid and this one is for builders and power users. But as I mentioned in this video, I'm still studying the Agent Grid. I'd come talk about it once I learn properly about it. Souren just keeps shipping!
1:28

Most AI tools today are just command-takers. You type, it responds. You click, it executes. There's truly no learning, no memory, no adaptation. You're still doing most of the work. Which is why Miles by Avo on Solana would make so much sense if built well. From what I understand so far, miles learns about you over time, adapts to how you operate, and figures out the tools you struggle to navigate on your own. Less clicking, more conversation, the more you use it, the better it gets at working with you, not just for you. That shift from command-follower to learning companion is bigger than it sounds. It's the difference between a tool and an agent that actually knows you. The second one is Agent Grid and this one is for builders and power users. But as I mentioned in this video, I'm still studying the Agent Grid. I'd come talk about it once I learn properly about it. Souren just keeps shipping!

Sir Khaycee

20,465 次观看 • 6 个月前

"You can't explain 'day/night, Seasons, Equinox, and 24 hour daylight* on Flat Earth" Sure I can. *not sunlight The concept of day and night on a flat Earth involves several key ideas related to optics and perception rather than the presumption of physical rotation of a spherical Earth. [FlatGPT Explain sunlight and day/night as if to a child] On a flat Earth, the sun is often depicted as moving in a circular path above the plane. This movement is the cause of the cycle of day and night as different areas come into and out of the sun's light. As the sun sets, it's daylight is still visible for a time until it soon vanishes. Atmospheric conditions like refraction and diffraction affect how we perceive the sun's position and are a large contributing factor to the apparent position of the sun or moon. The idea is that the human eye has a limit to its angular resolution, which affects how we perceive distant objects. This limit could cause objects, including the sun, to become unresolvable at a distance, giving the illusion of setting or disappearing beyond the horizon. The perception of the sun moving across the sky and creating day and night is attributed to perspective. As the sun moves away, it appears to set. And as it approaches, it appears to rise. The sun's light only covers only a portion of the Earth at any given time, (this is true in both models) creating areas of light and darkness. Depending upon the season, and the corresponding height of the sun, the distribution of daylight changes accordingly. The areas of light and darkness are directly determined by the sun's position and height relative to the plane. IF you imagine the Earth as a flat plane with the North Pole at its center and Antarctica defining its boundaries, then it could be said the sun revolves around the Earth in a defined, limited, and cyclical path. During the northern hemisphere's summer, the sun moves closer to the Tropic of Cancer, illuminating the northern regions and creating longer days. As the sun moves southward towards the Tropic of Capricorn, it illuminates the southern hemisphere while the northern hemisphere experiences shorter days and cooler temperatures. The sun's continuous cycle and limited journey creates the familiar patterns of day and night, as well as the changing seasons. Due to the restricted reach of the sun's rays, only half of the Earth is illuminated at any given time, while the other half remains in darkness. In summary, day and night on a flat Earth are driven by the sun's cyclical movement around the Earth, illuminating different regions as it travels between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn. The limited reach of the sun's rays causes half of the Earth to be in daylight while the other half experiences night. Don't let math be your undoing after all those years of bragging and condescension globies. A cardioid in parametric representation: 𝑥(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑)⋅cos⁡𝜑 , 𝑦(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑)⋅sin⁡𝜑 , 0≤𝜑<2𝜋 🤷‍♂️ and inpolar coordinates: 𝑟(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑). 😂 Day/night + seasons: Seasons with Chad: Daylight distribution: Daylight Distribution is equal on ANY map projection: The FE Model The Parrot: Just to hammer this home. The Model. The Video and Model Description: Here is an interactive Flat Earth Model that can explain Sunrise, The model is stolen!: Bendy Light: Misunderstanding the model and lightrays: Starman the the claims of heliocentricity: Show me the code: Misunderstanding The sun and the 'distance' These scale ops are because the celestial coord of the sun and moon are expressed as unit vectors. You scale by the distance to get the position of the object in space in the hemispherical view of the observer. It's used when calc the moon phases well, after scaling by using scalar product of moon and sun direction vectors. If anyone makes claims you cannot answer, send them to me. Cant refute anything.
2:49

"You can't explain 'day/night, Seasons, Equinox, and 24 hour daylight* on Flat Earth" Sure I can. *not sunlight The concept of day and night on a flat Earth involves several key ideas related to optics and perception rather than the presumption of physical rotation of a spherical Earth. [FlatGPT Explain sunlight and day/night as if to a child] On a flat Earth, the sun is often depicted as moving in a circular path above the plane. This movement is the cause of the cycle of day and night as different areas come into and out of the sun's light. As the sun sets, it's daylight is still visible for a time until it soon vanishes. Atmospheric conditions like refraction and diffraction affect how we perceive the sun's position and are a large contributing factor to the apparent position of the sun or moon. The idea is that the human eye has a limit to its angular resolution, which affects how we perceive distant objects. This limit could cause objects, including the sun, to become unresolvable at a distance, giving the illusion of setting or disappearing beyond the horizon. The perception of the sun moving across the sky and creating day and night is attributed to perspective. As the sun moves away, it appears to set. And as it approaches, it appears to rise. The sun's light only covers only a portion of the Earth at any given time, (this is true in both models) creating areas of light and darkness. Depending upon the season, and the corresponding height of the sun, the distribution of daylight changes accordingly. The areas of light and darkness are directly determined by the sun's position and height relative to the plane. IF you imagine the Earth as a flat plane with the North Pole at its center and Antarctica defining its boundaries, then it could be said the sun revolves around the Earth in a defined, limited, and cyclical path. During the northern hemisphere's summer, the sun moves closer to the Tropic of Cancer, illuminating the northern regions and creating longer days. As the sun moves southward towards the Tropic of Capricorn, it illuminates the southern hemisphere while the northern hemisphere experiences shorter days and cooler temperatures. The sun's continuous cycle and limited journey creates the familiar patterns of day and night, as well as the changing seasons. Due to the restricted reach of the sun's rays, only half of the Earth is illuminated at any given time, while the other half remains in darkness. In summary, day and night on a flat Earth are driven by the sun's cyclical movement around the Earth, illuminating different regions as it travels between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn. The limited reach of the sun's rays causes half of the Earth to be in daylight while the other half experiences night. Don't let math be your undoing after all those years of bragging and condescension globies. A cardioid in parametric representation: 𝑥(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑)⋅cos⁡𝜑 , 𝑦(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑)⋅sin⁡𝜑 , 0≤𝜑<2𝜋 🤷‍♂️ and inpolar coordinates: 𝑟(𝜑)=2𝑎(1−cos⁡𝜑). 😂 Day/night + seasons: Seasons with Chad: Daylight distribution: Daylight Distribution is equal on ANY map projection: The FE Model The Parrot: Just to hammer this home. The Model. The Video and Model Description: Here is an interactive Flat Earth Model that can explain Sunrise, The model is stolen!: Bendy Light: Misunderstanding the model and lightrays: Starman the the claims of heliocentricity: Show me the code: Misunderstanding The sun and the 'distance' These scale ops are because the celestial coord of the sun and moon are expressed as unit vectors. You scale by the distance to get the position of the object in space in the hemispherical view of the observer. It's used when calc the moon phases well, after scaling by using scalar product of moon and sun direction vectors. If anyone makes claims you cannot answer, send them to me. Cant refute anything.

Shane St Pierre

18,951 次观看 • 2 年前

"You're most likely to give up when you're out of the hardest part and things first start getting better. You're the farthest away from when you were first hyped up. And you're putting in the maximum amount of effort with the least to show for it. And since you're so far from when you thought it was just going to work, that you basically get demoralized and give up. And I now know how to see "this person's in the 'giving up because it's working' mode". 🔥🔥 from tommy on the early days of building Alloy Link in bio for our full conversation, going deep on the early days of fintech, lessons building a technical platform, and how hands-on customer implementations gave them PMF on steroids.
3:55

"You're most likely to give up when you're out of the hardest part and things first start getting better. You're the farthest away from when you were first hyped up. And you're putting in the maximum amount of effort with the least to show for it. And since you're so far from when you thought it was just going to work, that you basically get demoralized and give up. And I now know how to see "this person's in the 'giving up because it's working' mode". 🔥🔥 from tommy on the early days of building Alloy Link in bio for our full conversation, going deep on the early days of fintech, lessons building a technical platform, and how hands-on customer implementations gave them PMF on steroids.

The Peel

31,823 次观看 • 1 年前

The Sun feels warmer at noon than in the morning or evening, because it is physically right above you at local noon 🌞 Its heat is not traveling 93 million miles though a vacuum to get to you. This preposterous distance was made up to block you from understanding that it's a local luminary that was put here by God, circuiting above our Earth in perfect circles every day, its path narrowing and widening over the course of the year, which creates SEASONS. This geocentric model of how the Sun interacts with Earth makes complete sense. Unlike the heliocentric model, which makes zero sense, but everyone believes it anyway since they were taught it when they were too young to ask discerning questions like, "If the Sun and Moon are radically different sizes and distances, how come they've looked the EXACT same size in the sky to us here on Earth, for thousands of years of recorded history?" The deceivers in control of the modern matrix don't want you asking these questions, because it leads to you waking up on where you are, and therefore WHO you are, and why you're actually here inside God's creation.
1:24

The Sun feels warmer at noon than in the morning or evening, because it is physically right above you at local noon 🌞 Its heat is not traveling 93 million miles though a vacuum to get to you. This preposterous distance was made up to block you from understanding that it's a local luminary that was put here by God, circuiting above our Earth in perfect circles every day, its path narrowing and widening over the course of the year, which creates SEASONS. This geocentric model of how the Sun interacts with Earth makes complete sense. Unlike the heliocentric model, which makes zero sense, but everyone believes it anyway since they were taught it when they were too young to ask discerning questions like, "If the Sun and Moon are radically different sizes and distances, how come they've looked the EXACT same size in the sky to us here on Earth, for thousands of years of recorded history?" The deceivers in control of the modern matrix don't want you asking these questions, because it leads to you waking up on where you are, and therefore WHO you are, and why you're actually here inside God's creation.

Ben Wehrman

22,789 次观看 • 4 个月前

This is how every home gym owner ever feels while training around their family. Everyone's just chilling, relaxing, having a good time, and then you're the weirdo in the corner strapping bands and chains to your body like you're out of some horror movie, giving absolutely max effort, producing all sorts of Helm's Deep guttural noises, and having the time of your life. The way you know you're doing it enough is by seeing absolutely zero reactions from those just hanging out around you. If it's just white noise to them, it means you're doing it enough. If they look and comment, you need to start doing it more often. Whenever, I yell, "Yeah BUDDY, ain't nothin' but a peanut!" at the top of my lungs, my Wife doesn't even look up anymore. It's incredible.
1:01

This is how every home gym owner ever feels while training around their family. Everyone's just chilling, relaxing, having a good time, and then you're the weirdo in the corner strapping bands and chains to your body like you're out of some horror movie, giving absolutely max effort, producing all sorts of Helm's Deep guttural noises, and having the time of your life. The way you know you're doing it enough is by seeing absolutely zero reactions from those just hanging out around you. If it's just white noise to them, it means you're doing it enough. If they look and comment, you need to start doing it more often. Whenever, I yell, "Yeah BUDDY, ain't nothin' but a peanut!" at the top of my lungs, my Wife doesn't even look up anymore. It's incredible.

Cooper Mitchell - HomeGymGuy

10,490 次观看 • 1 个月前

CK on birthright citizenship sounds a lot like Clarence Thomas: "If you think you can just get on a Delta Airlines flight from Paris and all of a sudden your kid becomes a U.S. citizen, that devalues the meaning of what it is to be a citizen... It's not our job to open up our borders to every sad story around the place..." "The point being is this and President Trump's executive order is phenomenal. It goes back to this very basic question what does it mean to be a citizen? And we're throwing around citizenship like Frisbees every day. You're a citizen. You're a citizen. You're a citizen. And it dilutes the meaning of the citizen, of what it means to be a U.S. citizen. We need to bring it back to actually say, hey, you have to earn your citizenship. You are not given your citizenship."
0:57

CK on birthright citizenship sounds a lot like Clarence Thomas: "If you think you can just get on a Delta Airlines flight from Paris and all of a sudden your kid becomes a U.S. citizen, that devalues the meaning of what it is to be a citizen... It's not our job to open up our borders to every sad story around the place..." "The point being is this and President Trump's executive order is phenomenal. It goes back to this very basic question what does it mean to be a citizen? And we're throwing around citizenship like Frisbees every day. You're a citizen. You're a citizen. You're a citizen. And it dilutes the meaning of the citizen, of what it means to be a U.S. citizen. We need to bring it back to actually say, hey, you have to earn your citizenship. You are not given your citizenship."

Andrew Kolvet

118,510 次观看 • 3 个月前

Viktor Hovland made 8 birdies to close with a 5 under par 67 at the Masters. After the round, he went deep on the ball flight laws and the importance of matching up the club face to the swing path: “It's a good question. It's just tough to answer. First of all, that's why I like TrackMan and understanding the ball flight laws are very good to have because you can start a ball left, more left than you would like, but if it's curving back, who cares. That just means you're -- granted, if you're hitting it in the center your club path is just maybe creeping a bit more left, but if your face is in the right spot you're just hitting a bigger curve and then you can adjust that accordingly. “If you're starting the ball left and it's going left, is it a face issue, are you striking it off the heel and they're not coming back? There's a lot of minutiae involved with that. “If it's just a face-to-path issue or a club path direction, you can solve that pretty easily by playing a bigger cut or playing a bigger draw or moving it a bit more forward or back in the stance, simple stuff like that.” This is a great explanation that a lot of amateurs can learn from. The Masters
1:01

Viktor Hovland made 8 birdies to close with a 5 under par 67 at the Masters. After the round, he went deep on the ball flight laws and the importance of matching up the club face to the swing path: “It's a good question. It's just tough to answer. First of all, that's why I like TrackMan and understanding the ball flight laws are very good to have because you can start a ball left, more left than you would like, but if it's curving back, who cares. That just means you're -- granted, if you're hitting it in the center your club path is just maybe creeping a bit more left, but if your face is in the right spot you're just hitting a bigger curve and then you can adjust that accordingly. “If you're starting the ball left and it's going left, is it a face issue, are you striking it off the heel and they're not coming back? There's a lot of minutiae involved with that. “If it's just a face-to-path issue or a club path direction, you can solve that pretty easily by playing a bigger cut or playing a bigger draw or moving it a bit more forward or back in the stance, simple stuff like that.” This is a great explanation that a lot of amateurs can learn from. The Masters

Flushing It

667,750 次观看 • 6 个月前

Seoul to Paris Flight - Chasing the Moon - TIME LAPSE ✈️🌝 Beautiful high-altitude visualization of our local Moon completing its circular path above the Flat Earth plane. If you can watch this video and still believe: a) The Moon is 240,000 miles (380,000km) away, not close and local b) The Moon's bright luminance comes from sunlight reflected from thousands of miles away... Congratulations, you have been indoctrinated by a system that hates you, and wants you blind to the true nature of the world you live in! Please wake up! 😁
5:30

Seoul to Paris Flight - Chasing the Moon - TIME LAPSE ✈️🌝 Beautiful high-altitude visualization of our local Moon completing its circular path above the Flat Earth plane. If you can watch this video and still believe: a) The Moon is 240,000 miles (380,000km) away, not close and local b) The Moon's bright luminance comes from sunlight reflected from thousands of miles away... Congratulations, you have been indoctrinated by a system that hates you, and wants you blind to the true nature of the world you live in! Please wake up! 😁

₿en Wehrman

30,236 次观看 • 5 个月前

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth
0:33

There's a whole laundry list of proofs that I find independently convincing, but if I had to pick just one single argument to hang my hat on for why I believe the Earth is flat and stationary, it is the STARS & PLANETS, and their paths in the sky from Earth's POV. How do you explain in the heliocentric model, how every star traces perfect circles around the North Star, and every PLANET traces perfect sacred geometrical patterns around the North Star as well? According to the heliocentric model of the solar system (1st video) all of these spinning ball planets in the Milky Way are orbiting the SUN, at different speeds and path circumferences, at distance ranges from 36 million to 2.8 billion miles away from us. The North Star, NASA tells us, is 2.5 QUADRILLION miles away. Now tell me how all of these independent Sun-orbiting planets would trace PERFECT patterns around the North Star for 6,000+ years of recorded history? Venus literally creates a PERFECT flower of life pattern, which we see appear in nature here on Earth as well. Get the f*ck out of here if you think that's just a fluke cosmic accident. Not to mention, EVERY SINGLE CONSTELLATION has remained the exact same in our sky for 6,000 years? Not a single one has appeared or disappeared, while the universe is supposedly expanding at countless millions of miles per hour? Remember, these are all of Earth's movement vectors we are supposedly experiencing as we soar through the infinitely-expanding void of space 👇 🫨 1,000 MPH spinning around Earth's axis 🫨 66,600 MPH flying around Sun 🫨 500,000 MPH flying through the galaxy 🫨 1,300,000 MPH entire galaxy flying through space 🫨 All while the entire universe is EXPANDING, speeding all of these vectors up and warping the directions in different/random ways 🫨 ALL OF THE STARS we see are flying in different directions too, at their own incomprehensible speeds And yet, the stars we see in the night sky have never changed. Ever. I'm sorry but the "it's parallax" response from the globers doesn't cut it for me - that sounds like a glaring example of starting with a pre-determined conclusion in mind, and making anything up in the middle in order to get to that conclusion. (I WILL GRANT HOWEVER, that at least the parallax effect is something we can visibly see and experience on the micro level—unlike "gravity"—so I will concede that it obviously exists. I just don't believe that it explains all of the above motions, distances, and perfection of consistency in the patterns created by the cosmology we observe). Every ounce of my common sense-trusting brain tells me that all of these insanely huge numbers are just brain-numbing nonsense to obfuscate away from the far-simpler truth: that NONE of these incomprehensible speeds/distances are even happening at all, and rather, the Earth is flat and stationary, and these unchanging constellations and planetary movements are indeed revolving around US. The North Star (Polaris) lies directly above the North Pole, and does not move. The stars and planets rotate around the North Star, above Earth. Just as it looks and feels. I dove into way more nuance on all of these concepts in the first 3 Parts of the 5-Part Flat Earth video series I made for my podcast, which I will link below. WATCH THOSE VIDEOS. And as always, if you have refuting points to share, please drop them in the comments below so we can discuss! #FlatEarth

Ben Wehrman

12,019 次观看 • 6 个月前

I want to know what it's like to be the best in the world? Lewis Hamilton: "It feels pretty special for a short, but a really short space of time. Like, as soon as getting there, getting there, and then it's kind of. I think it's like being at the peak of a mountain. You can only be there for a short period of time, you've got to go down again. And so, it's like the climb down and then the build to trying to do it again.I think from the outside, it looks more than it is,It feels great that you've done it and you're proud of yourself, but then you're like, straight on to the next one"
0:35

I want to know what it's like to be the best in the world? Lewis Hamilton: "It feels pretty special for a short, but a really short space of time. Like, as soon as getting there, getting there, and then it's kind of. I think it's like being at the peak of a mountain. You can only be there for a short period of time, you've got to go down again. And so, it's like the climb down and then the build to trying to do it again.I think from the outside, it looks more than it is,It feels great that you've done it and you're proud of yourself, but then you're like, straight on to the next one"

LH44(A)

16,285 次观看 • 3 个月前

This was awesome. I got the opportunity to describe to Rick Rubin how I make Founders podcast: “Steph Curry was asked: What do you think of when you're taking a shot? And he said: Absolutely nothing. I’ve had people ask me how I choose what to highlight. What are you thinking of when you're doing this? And my response is: Nothing. I just read and if something jumps out to me I don't think at all, I just underline it. And then I'll go back through and reread all my highlights. And if that part is still interesting, it was interesting the first time, now it's interesting the second time, it's probably interesting to other people. There's 10 million mes out there. I'm not unique. And there's no way that if I read this line twice and found it interesting that if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think it's interesting too. If I overthink it or if I think of “oh this person might hear it” or “oh this many people will hear it” that gets in the way. I'm thinking of nothing.”
1:07

This was awesome. I got the opportunity to describe to Rick Rubin how I make Founders podcast: “Steph Curry was asked: What do you think of when you're taking a shot? And he said: Absolutely nothing. I’ve had people ask me how I choose what to highlight. What are you thinking of when you're doing this? And my response is: Nothing. I just read and if something jumps out to me I don't think at all, I just underline it. And then I'll go back through and reread all my highlights. And if that part is still interesting, it was interesting the first time, now it's interesting the second time, it's probably interesting to other people. There's 10 million mes out there. I'm not unique. And there's no way that if I read this line twice and found it interesting that if I read it on a podcast that somebody else is not going to think it's interesting too. If I overthink it or if I think of “oh this person might hear it” or “oh this many people will hear it” that gets in the way. I'm thinking of nothing.”

David Senra

32,924 次观看 • 4 个月前

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!
1:02

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Lusion™

87,350 次观看 • 6 个月前

Come for the hilarious interaction between Xander Schauffele and Doug Ferguson. Stay for the great answer about the trend of removing trees from historic golf courses. "When I hear certain designers saying, I'm going to restore this course to 1915, I'm like, Well, it probably takes a good hundred years for a nice tree to grow, just to take it out, just to say it was where it was before. "I think people keep talking about distance and how the game is played, but just put a bunch of trees on a course -- I think Hilton Head is a good example. Do I like Hilton Head? Not really. But it's hard. It's kind of crazy, if you look at the winning score at Hilton Head and the winning score at Doral, one's called Hilton Head, and one's called the Blue monster. You're like I think the winning score at Miami is lower. It's just funny when you kind of look at it in that sense."
1:47

Come for the hilarious interaction between Xander Schauffele and Doug Ferguson. Stay for the great answer about the trend of removing trees from historic golf courses. "When I hear certain designers saying, I'm going to restore this course to 1915, I'm like, Well, it probably takes a good hundred years for a nice tree to grow, just to take it out, just to say it was where it was before. "I think people keep talking about distance and how the game is played, but just put a bunch of trees on a course -- I think Hilton Head is a good example. Do I like Hilton Head? Not really. But it's hard. It's kind of crazy, if you look at the winning score at Hilton Head and the winning score at Doral, one's called Hilton Head, and one's called the Blue monster. You're like I think the winning score at Miami is lower. It's just funny when you kind of look at it in that sense."

Cameron Jourdan

381,839 次观看 • 5 个月前

"I was getting on [Melyssa Ford] for hiding it, not doing it. I just felt like if you're doing this and this is all the rave out in the street and everybody is doing it, then come in there and tell us about it. ... If I'm watching you go in another room, throwing up, cramps, and whatever you're doing, it's like, 'Okay, something's going on over there.' I get people want to keep a secret. I'm not mad at that. Not me. If I'm on it, you're going to hear about it from me." - Joe Budden
6:46

"I was getting on [Melyssa Ford] for hiding it, not doing it. I just felt like if you're doing this and this is all the rave out in the street and everybody is doing it, then come in there and tell us about it. ... If I'm watching you go in another room, throwing up, cramps, and whatever you're doing, it's like, 'Okay, something's going on over there.' I get people want to keep a secret. I'm not mad at that. Not me. If I'm on it, you're going to hear about it from me." - Joe Budden

Club Shay Shay

365,511 次观看 • 8 个月前