Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Someone used Claude Code with an open-source Blender MCP addon to create most of the 3D assets for a fishing game. → A single Claude Code session controlled both Blender and Unity through the Model Context Protocol → The developer's case study describes a 40-part, 42-bone crab model created... show more

0xMarioNawfal

270,598 subscribers

56,590 views • 11 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Gaming Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Asked Claude to create a car chase with Blender and Livepeer MCP. Here's the result:

Asked Claude to create a car chase with Blender and Livepeer MCP. Here's the result:

Livepeer

13,692 views • 1 month ago

Progress on my spinning top battle game. Vibe-coding this with Claude Code, Opus 4.8 and using assets created with the Magnific MCP. Main improvements are the 3D models with the Magnific MCP. 1. 4 top varieties converted to 3D model. 2. Batle stadium 3D model. Also added new attacks, collisions, health bars, jump and dash buttons.

Progress on my spinning top battle game. Vibe-coding this with Claude Code, Opus 4.8 and using assets created with the Magnific MCP. Main improvements are the 3D models with the Magnific MCP. 1. 4 top varieties converted to 3D model. 2. Batle stadium 3D model. Also added new attacks, collisions, health bars, jump and dash buttons.

Jerrod Lew

13,874 views • 4 months ago

Claude Code vs Blender is getting f*cking ridiculous One approach builds a jet engine by hand The other turns a written description into a programmable 3D scene with rotating turbines, mechanical components, realistic materials, and cinematic camera movement And the difference goes way beyond modeling speed Traditional Blender workflow: > MODEL individual mechanical components > POSITION and assemble the geometry > CONFIGURE materials, lighting, and cameras > ANIMATE every moving mechanism > REWORK the scene when specifications change Claude Code + Blender Python: > GENERATE geometry from parameters > ASSEMBLE components programmatically > CONTROL turbine rotation through variables > AUTOMATE lighting and camera movements > REBUILD variations by editing the script The interesting part isn't that AI magically replaces Blender It's that Claude Code can operate Blender through Python, turning repetitive manual work into a reproducible system Want to test the difference? Open Claude Code and ask: "Generate a Blender Python script for a detailed turbofan engine with separate compressor and turbine stages, parameterized blade counts, independent shaft rotation, metallic materials, and a cinematic camera orbit Keep the geometry modular and expose the main parameters so I can regenerate variations without remodeling everything" Blender remains the rendering engine Claude Code changes how you build and control the scene Bookmark this workflow before your next 3D project

Claude Code vs Blender is getting f*cking ridiculous One approach builds a jet engine by hand The other turns a written description into a programmable 3D scene with rotating turbines, mechanical components, realistic materials, and cinematic camera movement And the difference goes way beyond modeling speed Traditional Blender workflow: > MODEL individual mechanical components > POSITION and assemble the geometry > CONFIGURE materials, lighting, and cameras > ANIMATE every moving mechanism > REWORK the scene when specifications change Claude Code + Blender Python: > GENERATE geometry from parameters > ASSEMBLE components programmatically > CONTROL turbine rotation through variables > AUTOMATE lighting and camera movements > REBUILD variations by editing the script The interesting part isn't that AI magically replaces Blender It's that Claude Code can operate Blender through Python, turning repetitive manual work into a reproducible system Want to test the difference? Open Claude Code and ask: "Generate a Blender Python script for a detailed turbofan engine with separate compressor and turbine stages, parameterized blade counts, independent shaft rotation, metallic materials, and a cinematic camera orbit Keep the geometry modular and expose the main parameters so I can regenerate variations without remodeling everything" Blender remains the rendering engine Claude Code changes how you build and control the scene Bookmark this workflow before your next 3D project

Lummox

34,057 views • 9 days ago

motion designers are in serious danger, here is why an AI agent can now model a 3D scene in Blender, animate a website and render a finished MP4. you describe it, the agent builds it. three repos doing exactly that: -> HyperFrames: write HTML, get a video. made by HeyGen for AI agents. ask for a 10-second product intro with a fade-in title and background music, and the agent plans it, animates it and renders the MP4 -> MCP for Blender: connects Blender to Claude or any other model. the agent creates objects, builds scenes and edits them in real 3D while you watch -> GSAP skills: the official skills that teach coding agents to animate the web properly with GSAP. timelines, scroll effects, the stuff premium landing pages are made of the setup for HyperFrames in Claude Code is two lines: claude plugin marketplace add heygen-com/hyperframes claude plugin install hyperframes@hyperframes then just type /hyperframes:hyperframes and describe your video. the stack in one line: Blender for the 3D, GSAP for the motion, HyperFrames for the final render. bookmark this before your next client asks for a promo video.

motion designers are in serious danger, here is why an AI agent can now model a 3D scene in Blender, animate a website and render a finished MP4. you describe it, the agent builds it. three repos doing exactly that: -> HyperFrames: write HTML, get a video. made by HeyGen for AI agents. ask for a 10-second product intro with a fade-in title and background music, and the agent plans it, animates it and renders the MP4 -> MCP for Blender: connects Blender to Claude or any other model. the agent creates objects, builds scenes and edits them in real 3D while you watch -> GSAP skills: the official skills that teach coding agents to animate the web properly with GSAP. timelines, scroll effects, the stuff premium landing pages are made of the setup for HyperFrames in Claude Code is two lines: claude plugin marketplace add heygen-com/hyperframes claude plugin install hyperframes@hyperframes then just type /hyperframes:hyperframes and describe your video. the stack in one line: Blender for the 3D, GSAP for the motion, HyperFrames for the final render. bookmark this before your next client asks for a promo video.

kiosa

62,425 views • 12 days ago

Claude Code vs Blender just exposed how AI can f*cking burn through your budget Two workflows building the same complex 3D rocket assembly, but one ends up costing nearly 19x more in the demo And the scary part is how easily those costs can spiral without improving the final result Claude Code can reason through geometry, generate Python scripts, assemble mechanical components, and automate entire animation sequences But every unnecessary tool call, failed generation, and repeated rebuild adds another layer of cost Meanwhile, Blender can execute predefined operations without paying for another round of AI reasoning Here’s where the workflows differ: Traditional Blender: MODEL individual rocket components POSITION mechanical structures and hinges CONFIGURE materials, lighting, and cameras ANIMATE deployable panels REFINE and reuse finished assets Claude Code + Blender Python: GENERATE geometry from written instructions ASSEMBLE components programmatically PARAMETERIZE dimensions and deployment angles AUTOMATE animations and camera movements REBUILD variations by modifying code The real problem isn’t that AI is expensive It’s using AI reasoning for work that a deterministic script could execute for almost nothing Want to test the difference? Open Claude Code with Blender installed and paste: “Create a procedural Blender Python generator for a detailed rocket assembly with deployable panels, animated hinges, and realistic metallic materials Separate geometry, materials, animation, and camera setup into reusable functions Expose all major design parameters, reuse existing objects where possible, and track execution time and available AI usage costs” The future isn’t Claude Code replacing Blender It’s knowing when to stop paying AI to think and let specialized tools execute Bookmark this workflow before your next 3D project

Claude Code vs Blender just exposed how AI can f*cking burn through your budget Two workflows building the same complex 3D rocket assembly, but one ends up costing nearly 19x more in the demo And the scary part is how easily those costs can spiral without improving the final result Claude Code can reason through geometry, generate Python scripts, assemble mechanical components, and automate entire animation sequences But every unnecessary tool call, failed generation, and repeated rebuild adds another layer of cost Meanwhile, Blender can execute predefined operations without paying for another round of AI reasoning Here’s where the workflows differ: Traditional Blender: MODEL individual rocket components POSITION mechanical structures and hinges CONFIGURE materials, lighting, and cameras ANIMATE deployable panels REFINE and reuse finished assets Claude Code + Blender Python: GENERATE geometry from written instructions ASSEMBLE components programmatically PARAMETERIZE dimensions and deployment angles AUTOMATE animations and camera movements REBUILD variations by modifying code The real problem isn’t that AI is expensive It’s using AI reasoning for work that a deterministic script could execute for almost nothing Want to test the difference? Open Claude Code with Blender installed and paste: “Create a procedural Blender Python generator for a detailed rocket assembly with deployable panels, animated hinges, and realistic metallic materials Separate geometry, materials, animation, and camera setup into reusable functions Expose all major design parameters, reuse existing objects where possible, and track execution time and available AI usage costs” The future isn’t Claude Code replacing Blender It’s knowing when to stop paying AI to think and let specialized tools execute Bookmark this workflow before your next 3D project

Lummox

14,243 views • 7 days ago

Claude Code vs Blender is getting f*cking illegal Two workflows building the same complex 3D rocket assembly, but one costs nearly 19x more in the demo And the difference reveals something most AI automation demos completely ignore Claude Code can reason through geometry, generate Python scripts, assemble mechanical components, and automate complex animations But every unnecessary tool call, failed generation, and repeated rebuild adds overhead that can make the final result ridiculously expensive Meanwhile, Blender can execute predefined procedural operations without paying for another round of AI reasoning Here’s where the workflows differ: Traditional Blender: MODEL individual rocket components POSITION mechanical structures and hinges CONFIGURE materials, lighting, and cameras ANIMATE deployable panels REFINE and reuse finished assets Claude Code + Blender Python: GENERATE geometry from written instructions ASSEMBLE mechanical components through scripts PARAMETERIZE dimensions and deployment angles AUTOMATE animation and camera movement REBUILD variations by changing code The interesting part isn’t which tool wins It’s knowing when AI reasoning is worth the cost and when a deterministic script can do the job Want to recreate the experiment? Open Claude Code with Blender installed and paste: “Create a procedural Blender Python generator for a detailed rocket assembly with deployable panels, animated hinges, and realistic metallic materials Separate geometry, materials, animation, and camera setup into reusable functions Expose all major design parameters, avoid rebuilding unchanged objects, and log execution time and available AI usage costs” Blender handles the 3D execution Claude Code makes the workflow programmable The real advantage isn’t using more AI It’s getting the same result without paying for unnecessary intelligence Bookmark this workflow before your next 3D project

Claude Code vs Blender is getting f*cking illegal Two workflows building the same complex 3D rocket assembly, but one costs nearly 19x more in the demo And the difference reveals something most AI automation demos completely ignore Claude Code can reason through geometry, generate Python scripts, assemble mechanical components, and automate complex animations But every unnecessary tool call, failed generation, and repeated rebuild adds overhead that can make the final result ridiculously expensive Meanwhile, Blender can execute predefined procedural operations without paying for another round of AI reasoning Here’s where the workflows differ: Traditional Blender: MODEL individual rocket components POSITION mechanical structures and hinges CONFIGURE materials, lighting, and cameras ANIMATE deployable panels REFINE and reuse finished assets Claude Code + Blender Python: GENERATE geometry from written instructions ASSEMBLE mechanical components through scripts PARAMETERIZE dimensions and deployment angles AUTOMATE animation and camera movement REBUILD variations by changing code The interesting part isn’t which tool wins It’s knowing when AI reasoning is worth the cost and when a deterministic script can do the job Want to recreate the experiment? Open Claude Code with Blender installed and paste: “Create a procedural Blender Python generator for a detailed rocket assembly with deployable panels, animated hinges, and realistic metallic materials Separate geometry, materials, animation, and camera setup into reusable functions Expose all major design parameters, avoid rebuilding unchanged objects, and log execution time and available AI usage costs” Blender handles the 3D execution Claude Code makes the workflow programmable The real advantage isn’t using more AI It’s getting the same result without paying for unnecessary intelligence Bookmark this workflow before your next 3D project

Lummox

64,016 views • 8 days ago

🚀 🤖 I’m excited to release the first version of Laravel Loop, an MCP Server for Laravel that allows you to create custom tools and connect your Laravel app directly to AI tools like Cursor, Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and others. Let me show you how it works in... 👇

🚀 🤖 I’m excited to release the first version of Laravel Loop, an MCP Server for Laravel that allows you to create custom tools and connect your Laravel app directly to AI tools like Cursor, Claude Code, Claude Desktop, and others. Let me show you how it works in... 👇

Luis Dalmolin

28,488 views • 1 year ago

MoonPay is now live in Claude! Claude users can onramp crypto and move value onchain, powered by the MoonPay Model Context Protocol (MCP)

MoonPay is now live in Claude! Claude users can onramp crypto and move value onchain, powered by the MoonPay Model Context Protocol (MCP)

MoonPay 🟣

36,225 views • 3 months ago

Introducing Generative UI for MCP Apps One server. Infinite interfaces. Instead of building views, define a component catalog. The AI assembles the right UI based on your API, CLI or MCP server tools. Works in Claude, ChatGPT, VS Code, Cursor and more

Introducing Generative UI for MCP Apps One server. Infinite interfaces. Instead of building views, define a component catalog. The AI assembles the right UI based on your API, CLI or MCP server tools. Works in Claude, ChatGPT, VS Code, Cursor and more

Chris Tate

165,297 views • 7 months ago

Connect Claude to Blender to create and edit 3D models. I haven't used Blender in ages, but have fond memories doing the famous donut tutorial. I gave Claude an image of a donut, and it got to work immediately to match colors, sprinkles, frosting and even the lights! So cool!

Connect Claude to Blender to create and edit 3D models. I haven't used Blender in ages, but have fond memories doing the famous donut tutorial. I gave Claude an image of a donut, and it got to work immediately to match colors, sprinkles, frosting and even the lights! So cool!

Jerrod Lew

151,480 views • 6 months ago

A reference sheet can now become a complete 3D asset and an interactive website. I generated the multi-view temple concept with GPT Image 2.0, then gave it to Codex + GPT-5.6 Ultra through Blender MCP. Blender was controlled entirely from the terminal. The model, materials, cameras, renders and exports were all generated through Python scripts. Codex then created a Three.js viewer where I can rotate the temple, switch between every angle and hide each architectural layer. The result still needs refinement, especially around the roofs and ornaments, but the complete image → Blender → web workflow is working. All from one prompt 👇

A reference sheet can now become a complete 3D asset and an interactive website. I generated the multi-view temple concept with GPT Image 2.0, then gave it to Codex + GPT-5.6 Ultra through Blender MCP. Blender was controlled entirely from the terminal. The model, materials, cameras, renders and exports were all generated through Python scripts. Codex then created a Three.js viewer where I can rotate the temple, switch between every angle and hide each architectural layer. The result still needs refinement, especially around the roofs and ornaments, but the complete image → Blender → web workflow is working. All from one prompt 👇

Givros

26,024 views • 3 months ago

BloFin launches the BloFin MCP Server. An open-source Model Context Protocol implementation connecting AI agents to trading infrastructure with 40 developer tools. A step toward BloFin’s mission to build top-tier AI financial infrastructure.

BloFin launches the BloFin MCP Server. An open-source Model Context Protocol implementation connecting AI agents to trading infrastructure with 40 developer tools. A step toward BloFin’s mission to build top-tier AI financial infrastructure.

BloFin Exchange

65,524 views • 7 months ago

K3.1 Pro works directly in the tools used by the 3D modeling and game industries - Blender, Unreal Engine, Godot, and CAD. On BenchCAD, which tests 3D reconstruction from multi-view renderings through CAD code generation, it scores 92.7% with tools, approaching Claude Opus 5.5 (96.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (95.9%). K3.1 Pro can deliver a fairly complete project, from asset construction to scene assembly, animation, and rendering.

K3.1 Pro works directly in the tools used by the 3D modeling and game industries - Blender, Unreal Engine, Godot, and CAD. On BenchCAD, which tests 3D reconstruction from multi-view renderings through CAD code generation, it scores 92.7% with tools, approaching Claude Opus 5.5 (96.2%) and GPT-6 Astra (95.9%). K3.1 Pro can deliver a fairly complete project, from asset construction to scene assembly, animation, and rendering.

Kimi.ai

155,988 views • 6 days ago

Built this with the new shadcn CLI MCP + Namespaced registry and Claude Code in around 5 minutes

Built this with the new shadcn CLI MCP + Namespaced registry and Claude Code in around 5 minutes

Manu Arora

30,417 views • 1 year ago

I keep seeing the same pattern with Three.js games, shaders, p5.js, and now 3D UI. Give a coding agent a strong reference, the live URL, and the source repo. It can study the mechanics, recreate them, and give you a working place to experiment. For this one, I turned a Trevor Noah-inspired book interaction into fictional manuals for Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor. X post: GitHub: Original site:

I keep seeing the same pattern with Three.js games, shaders, p5.js, and now 3D UI. Give a coding agent a strong reference, the live URL, and the source repo. It can study the mechanics, recreate them, and give you a working place to experiment. For this one, I turned a Trevor Noah-inspired book interaction into fictional manuals for Codex, Claude Code, and Cursor. X post: GitHub: Original site:

Meng To

181,281 views • 3 months ago

Introducing text-to-lottie: an open source skill and harness for generating production ready Lottie animations with codex/claude code. $ npx skills add diffusionstudio/lottie Prompts guide and repo in the comments.

Introducing text-to-lottie: an open source skill and harness for generating production ready Lottie animations with codex/claude code. $ npx skills add diffusionstudio/lottie Prompts guide and repo in the comments.

konstantinpaulus

885,127 views • 4 months ago

Claude Code can now connect to remote MCP servers. Pull context from your tools directly into Claude Code with no local setup required.

Claude Code can now connect to remote MCP servers. Pull context from your tools directly into Claude Code with no local setup required.

Anthropic

541,596 views • 1 year ago

#wip #30dayMapChallenge a new tool Experimenting with the #DeepPaint addon in #Blender to 'paint' a landscape - coloring a 3D model of landscape generated from USGS lidar point cloud data.

#wip #30dayMapChallenge a new tool Experimenting with the #DeepPaint addon in #Blender to 'paint' a landscape - coloring a 3D model of landscape generated from USGS lidar point cloud data.

Wendy Shijia

60,384 views • 1 year ago

the Shopify AI Toolkit is here manage your store with your favorite agent Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, and more

the Shopify AI Toolkit is here manage your store with your favorite agent Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, VS Code, and more

Shopify

4,001,139 views • 6 months ago

indie studios, hello how i add fishing to my cozy farm game with Opus 5.5 the trick is adding one new verb per zone. this zone's verb is fishing: step 1 -> Claude Code drives Unity 6 via unity-mcp, Blender via blender-mcp step 2 -> village as a new scene, farm HUD carried over as one prefab step 3 -> Tripo for the set: pier, lighthouse, 4 boats, crab traps, fish stall step 4 -> Opus rigs the cast in Blender and builds the water with URP shaders step 5 -> fishing as one system: cast, tension bar, catch card, coins step 6 -> 12 fish species in a sheet, Opus balances rarity and prices before code step 7 -> ElevenLabs for splashes, gulls, reel clicks. Cinemachine follows the player who does what: > tripo: every new model > unity 6: scenes, water, lighting > opus 5.5: c# scripts, rigging, the fish economy > you: fish until it feels right one new zone, one new verb. the farm plays the same, the island just got bigger next zone: the mine or the forest?

indie studios, hello how i add fishing to my cozy farm game with Opus 5.5 the trick is adding one new verb per zone. this zone's verb is fishing: step 1 -> Claude Code drives Unity 6 via unity-mcp, Blender via blender-mcp step 2 -> village as a new scene, farm HUD carried over as one prefab step 3 -> Tripo for the set: pier, lighthouse, 4 boats, crab traps, fish stall step 4 -> Opus rigs the cast in Blender and builds the water with URP shaders step 5 -> fishing as one system: cast, tension bar, catch card, coins step 6 -> 12 fish species in a sheet, Opus balances rarity and prices before code step 7 -> ElevenLabs for splashes, gulls, reel clicks. Cinemachine follows the player who does what: > tripo: every new model > unity 6: scenes, water, lighting > opus 5.5: c# scripts, rigging, the fish economy > you: fish until it feels right one new zone, one new verb. the farm plays the same, the island just got bigger next zone: the mine or the forest?

Mnimiy

27,108 views • 13 days ago