正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Sometimes satire speaks louder than slogans because it exposes truths that plain speech struggles to make people hear. This discussion cuts to the heart of a deeper question: Who funds politics, and who pays the price? When political parties receive enormous corporate funding but ordinary students must survive on...

22,894 次观看 • 3 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BBC News, "Reform UK has received two record donations, both of £36 million" "Given by two different crypto currency billionaires, Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne" "Last year, if you add up all of the cash donations given to all of the political parties, it comes to about £69m" "These two donations alone come to £72m" This should alarm people regardless of whether they support Reform UK, Labour, the Conservatives or anyone else. The issue is not simply that the donations are large; it is that two ultra-wealthy individuals can give more to one political party than all parties collectively received in cash donations over the previous year. A democracy is meant to rest on political equality: each of us gets one vote. But that principle is weakened when a tiny number of billionaires can supply a party with a campaign machine, advertising reach, staff, polling, data, events and media attention on a scale unavailable to everyone else. They may not literally be buying votes, but they are able to buy an extraordinary amount of political influence. And influence is not only about an explicit quid pro quo. A party that owes much of its financial strength to a couple of donors knows who enabled it. It may become more receptive to their worldview, commercial interests and priorities - consciously or unconsciously - while ordinary supporters, trade unions, local members and voters cannot possibly command comparable access. The fact that these sums are declared does not make the underlying imbalance healthy. Transparency lets us see the problem; it does not solve it. If £72 million from two people can outweigh the combined annual cash donations to every party, the question is whether Britain still has a system in which political power is primarily earned through public support, or one in which vast private wealth can purchase a far louder voice than the public.

Farrukh

14,127 次观看 • 23 天前

WHEN CITIZENS QUESTION THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM, ACCOUNTABILITY MUST ANSWER The question raised by advocate Mahmood Pracha in this video goes to the heart of democratic accountability: Who is accountable when citizens believe their right to vote is being compromised? Pracha calls for sustained public mobilisation over the Election Commission, SIR, voter-list changes and the electoral process. He argues that citizens must defend constitutional rights through lawful democratic protest and demands answers from those responsible for administering elections. Some of his statements in the video are political allegations or demands and should be understood as such—not as established judicial findings. But there is a documented issue that deserves scrutiny. The Indian Express reported that Election Commissioners Vivek Joshi and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu objected to changes made to Form 6, describing the change as “illegal” and “unauthorised.” The disputed change required new voters to answer questions connected with earlier SIR electoral rolls. That makes transparency more than a political slogan. It means citizens deserve clear answers: Who authorised the change? Why was it introduced? Why were objections raised internally? What safeguards exist to ensure that eligible citizens are not excluded? Pracha has also announced a 10 October Jantar Mantar mobilisation around EVMs and SIR. Independent reporting confirms that such a protest has been announced, although its exact scale and arrangements remain subject to permissions and developments. A democracy does not become stronger by silencing questions. It becomes stronger when institutions can answer difficult questions with documents, procedures and evidence. Protect the vote. Demand transparency. Question power—peacefully, lawfully and persistently. Video: Mahmood Pracha Video source/creator: Khabar Clips Source: FAIR USE DISCLAIMER: This content is shared for purposes of criticism, comment, education, research, and public discussion. All rights to the original video belong to their respective copyright holders. #DimaagiNaxal #Resistance #UnitedResistance

Ashok Dadhwal

52,615 次观看 • 3 天前

Some leaders talk about the masses only when election is near. Others make the masses part of their journey long before the cameras arrive. That is the difference Shugaba Bello El-Rufai represents. Bello’s politics is not built on empty noise. It is built on resilience, accessibility, mentorship, and genuine concern for ordinary people. In a country where many politicians remember the poor only during campaigns, Bello has shown a different kind of leadership: the kind that lifts people, opens doors, builds confidence, and gives the children of the poor a reason to believe they also belong in the room. Leadership is not only about holding office. Leadership is about impact. It is about how many people can say their lives became better because you showed up. It is about whether young people around you become stronger, wiser, more confident, and more prepared for the future. This is where Bello stands out. He has not only positioned himself as a political figure; he has become a guide, a mentor, and a bridge for many people who would have otherwise been ignored by the system. He understands that politics should not be a private ladder for the privileged. It should be a platform for human development. When the children of ordinary people begin to stand tall, speak with confidence, compete with the privileged, and feel a sense of dignity, that is not ordinary politics. That is social transformation. Nigeria needs leaders who can see potential in people before society sees it. Leaders who can identify talent among the poor and give it structure. Leaders who do not measure people by their background, but by their capacity to grow. Shugaba Bello El-Rufai represents that rare political energy: firm, passionate, people-focused, and deeply invested in raising others. A true leader does not only rise. A true leader raises people with him. And that is why Bello’s story continues to inspire loyalty, confidence, and respect.

ADC Vanguard

16,121 次观看 • 4 个月前

We strongly condemn the reported attempt to stop El-Rufai’s wife from giving him food while he remains in custody. No matter the politics, no matter the allegation, no matter who is involved, this kind of treatment is unacceptable in any democracy that claims to respect human dignity. Anti-corruption agencies are not punishment centres. ICPC is not a torture chamber. Detention is not a licence to humiliate suspects, punish families, or turn investigation into psychological intimidation. Even when a man is under investigation, he remains a human being. He remains a citizen. He remains entitled to dignity, welfare, access to lawyers, and fair treatment. Let it be clear: nobody is asking that El-Rufai should be above the law. If there is evidence against him, charge him properly. If there is a case, prosecute him openly. If there are questions to answer, let him answer them before a competent court. But denying or restricting basic access to family support, especially food, creates the impression that this is no longer just investigation. It begins to look like vengeance. This is how institutions lose public trust. When agencies behave with emotion instead of procedure, Nigerians stop seeing justice and start seeing political persecution. The rule of law is not tested by how government treats its friends. It is tested by how government treats its critics, opponents, and those it disagrees with. Today, the target is El-Rufai. Tomorrow, it can be any Nigerian whose politics offends those in power. That is why this must be condemned now, loudly and clearly. ICPC must explain what is happening. The government must respect due process. Charge him, release him, or treat him strictly within the limits of the law. A government that uses custody to break people is not fighting corruption. It is abusing power.

ADC Vanguard

12,480 次观看 • 4 个月前

In the topical immigration debates taking place in South Africa, many ignorant people have been manipulated by politicians and individuals with political ambitions who are exploiting that ignorance for their own agendas. But not everyone is ignorant to the real issues at the heart of the crisis. Some voices within South African society, including from the white community, are now speaking openly and calling things for what they are. The reality is that immigration in South Africa is not simply about foreigners. It is also about failed governance across the region, corruption, unemployment, economic collapse, weak border management, and political leaders who refuse to confront the root causes driving migration. Increasingly, some South Africans are beginning to recognise that blaming migrants alone will not solve the deeper structural problems affecting the country. But who cares about facts and accurate narratives when all that is needed are emotions to drive people into doing things they have been wrongly told will mitigate their suffering and the abject poverty in which they live? The tragedy of populist politics is that it feeds on desperation, not truth. People who are struggling economically become easy targets for manipulation, especially when they are constantly told that vulnerable groups, rather than failed leadership and corruption, are responsible for their hardships. Who cares about all the corruption coming out of the Madlanga Commission? Who cares that hospitals are being looted while billions that should have been used for healthcare, schools, roads, housing, and service delivery are instead being squandered on Ferraris and lavish lifestyles for politically connected elites? Nobody cares about those facts. The public is deliberately distracted from the real criminals destroying society. Instead of confronting corruption, state capture, and political failure exposed before the Madlanga Commission, people are encouraged to direct their anger at the easiest and most vulnerable targets, foreign nationals who are themselves trying to survive poverty and economic hardship. That is how populist politics works. It protects the powerful while turning the poor against one another manipulating their ignorance.

Hopewell Chin’ono

28,220 次观看 • 4 个月前