Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

WHEN CITIZENS QUESTION THE ELECTORAL SYSTEM, ACCOUNTABILITY MUST ANSWER The question raised by advocate Mahmood Pracha in this video goes to the heart of democratic accountability: Who is accountable when citizens believe their right to vote is being compromised? Pracha calls for sustained public mobilisation over the Election Commission,... SIR, voter-list changes and the electoral process. He argues that citizens must defend constitutional rights through lawful democratic protest and demands answers from those responsible for administering elections. Some of his statements in the video are political allegations or demands and should be understood as such—not as established judicial findings. But there is a documented issue that deserves scrutiny. The Indian Express reported that Election Commissioners Vivek Joshi and Sukhbir Singh Sandhu objected to changes made to Form 6, describing the change as “illegal” and “unauthorised.” The disputed change required new voters to answer questions connected with earlier SIR electoral rolls. That makes transparency more than a political slogan. It means citizens deserve clear answers: Who authorised the change? Why was it introduced? Why were objections raised internally? What safeguards exist to ensure that eligible citizens are not excluded? Pracha has also announced a 10 October Jantar Mantar mobilisation around EVMs and SIR. Independent reporting confirms that such a protest has been announced, although its exact scale and arrangements remain subject to permissions and developments. A democracy does not become stronger by silencing questions. It becomes stronger when institutions can answer difficult questions with documents, procedures and evidence. Protect the vote. Demand transparency. Question power—peacefully, lawfully and persistently. Video: Mahmood Pracha Video source/creator: Khabar Clips Source: FAIR USE DISCLAIMER: This content is shared for purposes of criticism, comment, education, research, and public discussion. All rights to the original video belong to their respective copyright holders. #DimaagiNaxal #Resistance #UnitedResistanceshow more

Ashok Dadhwal

5,709 subscribers

52,615 views • 3 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Education Comedy

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

24 Comments

KV Pramod3 days ago

Very correct sir 👏👏👏

Nishikant Dandkar हिंदू3 days ago

Oooooo chutiya

prem singh mehra3 days ago

तुझे हार्ट अटैक न पड़ जाए

KV Pramod3 days ago

Kudos to you sir 👏👏👏

PB-10.Rajdeep Singh Ahluwalia 🇮🇳3 days ago

Yeah bonk ta rehta, results koi aa nhi rahe. Is ka alag he hi

VERNICLINE🇮🇳🇮🇳3 days ago

Ye chutiya sise hi bolke sabko fasata hai

Yogesh Tyagi3 days ago

अगर बदतमीजी करोगे तो सजा तो मिलेगी

Krs3 days ago

👍🏻💪🏻🔥🔥 besharam police bjp ke dalal jaise kaam kar raha hai. besharam 🚮🗑️dalal media,tumhare sawal bjp walon ne diya kya?sawal poochna nahi aata hai tho,bjp join karo. nalayak media baat karna seekho aain aiin aiin..aiin bewakoof jaise karke kya bol raha hai.🫏 @MehmoodPracha

USn Singh3 days ago

Touch मत करना भाई सीधा लातो मुक्के लट्ठों से ठोकना चल निकल चूतिये

राष्ट्रवादी🇮🇳3 days ago

अगर प्रदर्शन स्थल पर किसी भी प्रकार की अराजकता का माहौल बनता है और सरकारी संपत्तियों को कोई भी नुकसान पहुंचाया जाता है या पुलिस पर पथराव और मार पीट की जाती है तो सारी जिम्मेवारी फिर इन वकील साहब को ही लेनी चाहिए।

Rehima Begum3 days ago

Rastopoti kiu choop he kiu ak bond he kiya

Abhijit Bose3 days ago

Is Chutiye ko kyon nahi bajaya ja raha hai, ye sare choro ki fauj hai

dayakisan3 days ago

Sahi bol rhe ho sir ye jo officer hai iss Sarkar ke talwe chatne wale in mai kuch officer vidhayko ke rishtedaar hai madarchod suar kutte

Kk3 days ago

Bahut khoob

Puspa3 days ago

सबिधान रक्षा नहि कुर्शि खोजि है कुछ होता देखाइ देता नहि

सत्यमेव जयते। 🇮🇳🎯 💙3 days ago

It's a repeat #demonetization 🤣😂 99.3% of currency came back to the banks during demonetization (although #Dhurandhar2 was silent on it) ABOUT 91.13% of the decided appeals favored restoring the excluded electors to the rolls in WB Now many will reenter the rolls through #Form6

Boss3 days ago

Voter ID is a proof of Citizenship?🙄

Nemil Jogani3 days ago

Isko koi seriously toh lo 🥴

himanshu agarwal3 days ago

This vakil is chamcha of congress

xxyyzzd3 days ago

🙏🙏🙏

Anshul3 days ago

Excellent 👍👍👍👍👍

Vitamin_I3 days ago

@rashtrapatibhvn - Thank you for your achivement

Prateek Saxena3 days ago

Payment received.

BHUSHAN VASISHTH3 days ago

Saal gujar gaye ye neta nahi ban paa raha

Related Videos

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

The speaker argues that the current student protests over exam paper leaks should not be limited to demanding the resignation of the Education Minister. Instead, he claims the root cause lies with the central government, alleging that institutions such as the Election Commission and the electoral system have been compromised. Key themes include: Criticism of the Prime Minister, the BJP, RSS, and the Union government. Allegations that repeated exam paper leaks reflect systemic governance failures. Calls for a broader political movement rather than a single-issue protest. Strong criticism of EVMs and advocacy for a return to paper ballots. Claims that democratic institutions have been weakened. Criticism of India's foreign policy, particularly regarding the US, Israel, Iran, China, and oil imports. Appeals for youth and citizens to participate in peaceful, sustained democratic movements. The video primarily expresses political opinions and allegations, many of which are disputed or not established as fact. For example: Claims that elections cannot be won unless permitted by the Prime Minister are political assertions, not proven facts. Statements about the Election Commission being completely controlled or elections being predetermined remain matters of political debate rather than judicially established conclusions. References to exam paper leaks are grounded in real incidents, but the attribution of responsibility to specific political actors is the speaker's interpretation. This video is less a news report and more a political speech. It mixes genuine public concerns—such as exam paper leaks, unemployment, and institutional accountability—with strong political accusations and personal opinions. Some criticisms are based on real events, while many broader conclusions are contested and should not be accepted as established facts without independent evidence. A healthy democracy allows criticism of governments, but it also requires citizens to distinguish between verified facts, political opinion, and rhetorical claims.

Ashok Dadhwal

14,868 views • 3 months ago

“THE TRUTH SHOULD COME OUT — THAT IS WHAT POWER FEARS.” [Original Facebook Video — AR News India] ( Former Bombay High Court judge Justice B. G. Kolse Patil raises sharp questions about the Election Commission, judiciary and political power, while calling for truth, accountability and constitutional action. The video also raises questions about whether people should continue to press their demands when institutional avenues appear to have failed. His broader message is uncompromising: when citizens believe institutions are not hearing them, democratic pressure and public accountability remain essential. Justice Kolse Patil is indeed a former Bombay High Court judge. Creator Credit: AR News India — original video creator. #DimaagiNaxal #Resistance #UnitedResistance

“THE TRUTH SHOULD COME OUT — THAT IS WHAT POWER FEARS.” [Original Facebook Video — AR News India] ( Former Bombay High Court judge Justice B. G. Kolse Patil raises sharp questions about the Election Commission, judiciary and political power, while calling for truth, accountability and constitutional action. The video also raises questions about whether people should continue to press their demands when institutional avenues appear to have failed. His broader message is uncompromising: when citizens believe institutions are not hearing them, democratic pressure and public accountability remain essential. Justice Kolse Patil is indeed a former Bombay High Court judge. Creator Credit: AR News India — original video creator. #DimaagiNaxal #Resistance #UnitedResistance

Ashok Dadhwal

48,763 views • 17 days ago

When a citizen is forced to repeatedly prove that they are a citizen, democracy itself begins to stand trial. Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa raises a constitutional question that deserves every Indian's attention. If Aadhaar is not conclusive proof of citizenship, PAN is not, Voter ID is not, and the Ministry of External Affairs says even a passport is only a travel document and not conclusive proof of citizenship, then what certainty does an ordinary citizen have? In a democracy, the citizen is sovereign and the State exists to serve the citizen—not to keep every citizen under perpetual suspicion. Burdening millions of law-abiding people with repeatedly proving their identity and citizenship undermines trust in democratic institutions and risks excluding genuine citizens from exercising their constitutional rights. Lavasa argues that determining citizenship is not the Election Commission's role and cautions against shifting this burden onto citizens. A constitutional democracy is strengthened by inclusion, transparency and due process, not by creating uncertainty over the status of those who have lived, voted, paid taxes and contributed to the nation for decades. Video Link:

When a citizen is forced to repeatedly prove that they are a citizen, democracy itself begins to stand trial. Former Election Commissioner Ashok Lavasa raises a constitutional question that deserves every Indian's attention. If Aadhaar is not conclusive proof of citizenship, PAN is not, Voter ID is not, and the Ministry of External Affairs says even a passport is only a travel document and not conclusive proof of citizenship, then what certainty does an ordinary citizen have? In a democracy, the citizen is sovereign and the State exists to serve the citizen—not to keep every citizen under perpetual suspicion. Burdening millions of law-abiding people with repeatedly proving their identity and citizenship undermines trust in democratic institutions and risks excluding genuine citizens from exercising their constitutional rights. Lavasa argues that determining citizenship is not the Election Commission's role and cautions against shifting this burden onto citizens. A constitutional democracy is strengthened by inclusion, transparency and due process, not by creating uncertainty over the status of those who have lived, voted, paid taxes and contributed to the nation for decades. Video Link:

Ashok Dadhwal

11,470 views • 3 months ago

The health of a republic depends not only on elections being held, but on citizens trusting that institutions act fairly, transparently, and without discrimination. When people believe that voter registration, identity verification, or access to essential rights can be affected by administrative errors or arbitrary decisions, confidence in democracy inevitably weakens. A democracy must ensure that every eligible citizen has a genuine opportunity to vote and that any disputes are resolved quickly, transparently, and with due process. If bureaucratic procedures become so burdensome that they interfere with fundamental rights or essential public services, the state risks appearing more punitive than protective. Institutions derive their legitimacy from public trust, and that trust depends on fairness, accountability, and equal treatment under the law—not on selective or inconsistent application of rules. The strength of a constitutional republic is measured not by how efficiently it exercises power, but by how carefully it safeguards the rights and dignity of every individual, especially when mistakes occur. Protecting civil liberties, ensuring prompt remedies, and maintaining institutional neutrality are indispensable for preserving democratic legitimacy and the rule of law.

The health of a republic depends not only on elections being held, but on citizens trusting that institutions act fairly, transparently, and without discrimination. When people believe that voter registration, identity verification, or access to essential rights can be affected by administrative errors or arbitrary decisions, confidence in democracy inevitably weakens. A democracy must ensure that every eligible citizen has a genuine opportunity to vote and that any disputes are resolved quickly, transparently, and with due process. If bureaucratic procedures become so burdensome that they interfere with fundamental rights or essential public services, the state risks appearing more punitive than protective. Institutions derive their legitimacy from public trust, and that trust depends on fairness, accountability, and equal treatment under the law—not on selective or inconsistent application of rules. The strength of a constitutional republic is measured not by how efficiently it exercises power, but by how carefully it safeguards the rights and dignity of every individual, especially when mistakes occur. Protecting civil liberties, ensuring prompt remedies, and maintaining institutional neutrality are indispensable for preserving democratic legitimacy and the rule of law.

Ashok Dadhwal

13,045 views • 3 months ago

“My name has been removed from the voter list.” Voices from the ground at Jantar Mantar, where protesters gathered amid demands for the resignation and arrest of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. One protester from Delhi’s Okhla constituency says her name has disappeared from the electoral roll despite having lived in the city all her life and says she has been asked to make a new voter ID. Others question the police action at the protest and describe being detained and put into buses without being told where they were being taken. The protesters argue that they have gathered to defend their right to vote, protest peacefully and demand free and fair elections. The protest comes amid a wider political controversy over the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands for CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation. Watch this ground report till the end and follow DeKoder for more. #JantarMantar #ElectionCommission #SIR #GyaneshKumar #VoterList #VotingRights #ElectoralRolls #ECI #Delhi #Protest #IndianPolitics #Democracy #VoterID #ElectionCommissionOfIndia

“My name has been removed from the voter list.” Voices from the ground at Jantar Mantar, where protesters gathered amid demands for the resignation and arrest of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. One protester from Delhi’s Okhla constituency says her name has disappeared from the electoral roll despite having lived in the city all her life and says she has been asked to make a new voter ID. Others question the police action at the protest and describe being detained and put into buses without being told where they were being taken. The protesters argue that they have gathered to defend their right to vote, protest peacefully and demand free and fair elections. The protest comes amid a wider political controversy over the Election Commission, the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands for CEC Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation. Watch this ground report till the end and follow DeKoder for more. #JantarMantar #ElectionCommission #SIR #GyaneshKumar #VoterList #VotingRights #ElectoralRolls #ECI #Delhi #Protest #IndianPolitics #Democracy #VoterID #ElectionCommissionOfIndia

DeKoder

19,364 views • 9 days ago

“Those planning for the upcoming nationwide protest are criminals and Jobless”— Zamfara CP. The statement made by the Zamfara Commissioner of Police (CP) is a concerning and dismissive remark that undermines the democratic rights of citizens to peacefully assemble and express their grievances because: 1. Labeling protesters as criminals: This statement presupposes that anyone participating in the protest is a criminal, which is unfair and unjust. Protesters are exercising their constitutional rights to demand change and hold leaders accountable. 2. Dismissing concerns: By calling protesters "jobless," the CP trivializes the legitimate concerns and grievances that citizens want to bring attention to. This dismissive attitude ignores the root causes of social unrest and fails to address the underlying issues. 3. Intimidation: Such statements can be seen as an attempt to intimidate and discourage people from participating in the protest, thereby infringing on their rights to freedom of assembly and expression. 4. Lack of empathy : The CP's statement demonstrates a lack of understanding and empathy for the struggles and frustrations that citizens face, which can further exacerbate social tensions. It's essential for authorities to respect and protect citizens' rights, engage in constructive dialogue, and address the underlying issues driving the protest.

“Those planning for the upcoming nationwide protest are criminals and Jobless”— Zamfara CP. The statement made by the Zamfara Commissioner of Police (CP) is a concerning and dismissive remark that undermines the democratic rights of citizens to peacefully assemble and express their grievances because: 1. Labeling protesters as criminals: This statement presupposes that anyone participating in the protest is a criminal, which is unfair and unjust. Protesters are exercising their constitutional rights to demand change and hold leaders accountable. 2. Dismissing concerns: By calling protesters "jobless," the CP trivializes the legitimate concerns and grievances that citizens want to bring attention to. This dismissive attitude ignores the root causes of social unrest and fails to address the underlying issues. 3. Intimidation: Such statements can be seen as an attempt to intimidate and discourage people from participating in the protest, thereby infringing on their rights to freedom of assembly and expression. 4. Lack of empathy : The CP's statement demonstrates a lack of understanding and empathy for the struggles and frustrations that citizens face, which can further exacerbate social tensions. It's essential for authorities to respect and protect citizens' rights, engage in constructive dialogue, and address the underlying issues driving the protest.

Peter Obi Grassroots Commentary

22,191 views • 2 years ago

For centuries, India’s strength has not been uniformity but coexistence. Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains and countless communities have shared this land, its culture, its struggles and its dreams. Our Constitution transformed that shared inheritance into a promise of equal citizenship, where rights come from being Indian, not from religion, caste or identity. The pain expressed in this video reflects a deeper anxiety: when politics is built on division, fear and suspicion, it weakens the very foundation of the Republic. Democracies flourish when citizens are united by constitutional values, not separated into competing camps for electoral gain. India's future cannot be secured through hatred. It can only be secured through justice, equality, fraternity and respect for human dignity. Governments come and go, but the ideals of the Constitution must endure. Citizens across communities have a responsibility to reject polarization and defend the democratic values that generations before us struggled to build. The answer to divisive politics is not more division—it is a renewed commitment to constitutional citizenship, social harmony, and democratic accountability. India belongs equally to all its people, and that principle must remain non-negotiable. Link:

For centuries, India’s strength has not been uniformity but coexistence. Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, Buddhists, Jains and countless communities have shared this land, its culture, its struggles and its dreams. Our Constitution transformed that shared inheritance into a promise of equal citizenship, where rights come from being Indian, not from religion, caste or identity. The pain expressed in this video reflects a deeper anxiety: when politics is built on division, fear and suspicion, it weakens the very foundation of the Republic. Democracies flourish when citizens are united by constitutional values, not separated into competing camps for electoral gain. India's future cannot be secured through hatred. It can only be secured through justice, equality, fraternity and respect for human dignity. Governments come and go, but the ideals of the Constitution must endure. Citizens across communities have a responsibility to reject polarization and defend the democratic values that generations before us struggled to build. The answer to divisive politics is not more division—it is a renewed commitment to constitutional citizenship, social harmony, and democratic accountability. India belongs equally to all its people, and that principle must remain non-negotiable. Link:

Ashok Dadhwal

25,731 views • 3 months ago

VIDEO | On the EC-SIR row, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan says, “The revelation made today is extremely serious. It shows that the Election Commission has become the fiefdom of one person, Gyanesh Kumar. There are three Election Commissioners, and the other two have repeatedly raised objections to decisions of the Election Commission. Yet Gyanesh Kumar continues to do what he wants and ignores the other two Election Commissioners. An even more serious aspect of this revelation is that Gyanesh Kumar has centralised the entire IT system of the Election Commission to such an extent that all decisions are being taken centrally by the Election Commission in Delhi, including whose name should be added to the electoral roll, whose name should not be added and whose name should be deleted... This is such a serious matter that Gyanesh Kumar should not merely be removed from office; he should also be prosecuted. This is what needs to be done in this country.”

VIDEO | On the EC-SIR row, senior advocate Prashant Bhushan says, “The revelation made today is extremely serious. It shows that the Election Commission has become the fiefdom of one person, Gyanesh Kumar. There are three Election Commissioners, and the other two have repeatedly raised objections to decisions of the Election Commission. Yet Gyanesh Kumar continues to do what he wants and ignores the other two Election Commissioners. An even more serious aspect of this revelation is that Gyanesh Kumar has centralised the entire IT system of the Election Commission to such an extent that all decisions are being taken centrally by the Election Commission in Delhi, including whose name should be added to the electoral roll, whose name should not be added and whose name should be deleted... This is such a serious matter that Gyanesh Kumar should not merely be removed from office; he should also be prosecuted. This is what needs to be done in this country.”

Press Trust of India

35,234 views • 12 days ago

"We want an electoral system the citizens can trust" – Hon. Chikombo Hon. Chikombo delivered a passionate rejection of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (#CAB3) in Parliament, arguing that the proposed changes fail to address the real issues facing Zimbabwe's democracy. According to Chikombo, the Bill does not eliminate electoral toxicity, heal national divisions, or strengthen reconciliation. Instead, he warned that it centralises power and takes decision-making further away from ordinary citizens. "Election toxicity is not removed by extending terms, but by reforming power," he said. He argued that Zimbabwe does not need fewer elections, it needs better elections that are free, credible, and trusted by the people. In one of the most striking moments of his presentation, Chikombo said the Bill "transfers power from the citizens" and sends the message that "their vote is dangerous." Watch the full video to hear his detailed arguments and decide for yourself: Does Zimbabwe need constitutional amendments, or does it need electoral reforms that restore public trust? 🎥 Watch now and join the conversation. #CAB3 #Zimbabwe #Parliament #ElectoralReform #Democracy #Governance #ZimbabwePolitics

"We want an electoral system the citizens can trust" – Hon. Chikombo Hon. Chikombo delivered a passionate rejection of Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 (#CAB3) in Parliament, arguing that the proposed changes fail to address the real issues facing Zimbabwe's democracy. According to Chikombo, the Bill does not eliminate electoral toxicity, heal national divisions, or strengthen reconciliation. Instead, he warned that it centralises power and takes decision-making further away from ordinary citizens. "Election toxicity is not removed by extending terms, but by reforming power," he said. He argued that Zimbabwe does not need fewer elections, it needs better elections that are free, credible, and trusted by the people. In one of the most striking moments of his presentation, Chikombo said the Bill "transfers power from the citizens" and sends the message that "their vote is dangerous." Watch the full video to hear his detailed arguments and decide for yourself: Does Zimbabwe need constitutional amendments, or does it need electoral reforms that restore public trust? 🎥 Watch now and join the conversation. #CAB3 #Zimbabwe #Parliament #ElectoralReform #Democracy #Governance #ZimbabwePolitics

Change Radio

10,042 views • 3 months ago

With what many people have described as a joke in the name of an election in Ekiti State, I hope Nigerians are truly preparing for the 2027 elections. From what we are seeing, it appears that not only are many Nigerians unprepared, but our electoral system is also not inspiring the level of confidence that citizens expect. If we want credible elections in 2027, we must start paying attention now. We cannot wait until election day before demanding transparency, accountability, and integrity from all stakeholders. Democracy only works when the people are vigilant and when electoral institutions earn the trust of the citizens they serve. The time to prepare for 2027 is now.

With what many people have described as a joke in the name of an election in Ekiti State, I hope Nigerians are truly preparing for the 2027 elections. From what we are seeing, it appears that not only are many Nigerians unprepared, but our electoral system is also not inspiring the level of confidence that citizens expect. If we want credible elections in 2027, we must start paying attention now. We cannot wait until election day before demanding transparency, accountability, and integrity from all stakeholders. Democracy only works when the people are vigilant and when electoral institutions earn the trust of the citizens they serve. The time to prepare for 2027 is now.

JusticeCrack

23,024 views • 3 months ago

Delhi: Co-convenor, Cockroach Janta Party, Saurav Das says, "The second thing that is happening-look at Bengal. There is a very significant and serious observation regarding Bengal in these files. In Bengal, 60 lakh people were identified as having logical discrepancies. This means that there was some issue with their details, such as their names not matching or it not being clear whether their parents were included in the previous SIR. Out of those 60 lakh people, 33 lakh were subsequently added. But when those 33 lakh voters were added following the Supreme Court’s order, the Election Commission of India challenged the addition in court in a matter involving lakhs of voters. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi asked in the files: These appeals are being filed against voters in such large numbers-who authorised them? It is being done in the name of the Election Commission of India, but who is authorising it? You need to understand that the Election Commission is not the sole responsibility of one person. There are three Election Commissioners, and the Commission functions either by consensus or by majority vote. The two other Election Commissioners clearly called this illegal, but even then, the Election Commission of India, under the direction of Gyanesh Kumar-and whoever is directing or controlling him-has continued carrying out these illegal actions for months. It has been going on for a long time, for nearly one and a half years, since the SIR began..."

Delhi: Co-convenor, Cockroach Janta Party, Saurav Das says, "The second thing that is happening-look at Bengal. There is a very significant and serious observation regarding Bengal in these files. In Bengal, 60 lakh people were identified as having logical discrepancies. This means that there was some issue with their details, such as their names not matching or it not being clear whether their parents were included in the previous SIR. Out of those 60 lakh people, 33 lakh were subsequently added. But when those 33 lakh voters were added following the Supreme Court’s order, the Election Commission of India challenged the addition in court in a matter involving lakhs of voters. Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi asked in the files: These appeals are being filed against voters in such large numbers-who authorised them? It is being done in the name of the Election Commission of India, but who is authorising it? You need to understand that the Election Commission is not the sole responsibility of one person. There are three Election Commissioners, and the Commission functions either by consensus or by majority vote. The two other Election Commissioners clearly called this illegal, but even then, the Election Commission of India, under the direction of Gyanesh Kumar-and whoever is directing or controlling him-has continued carrying out these illegal actions for months. It has been going on for a long time, for nearly one and a half years, since the SIR began..."

IANS

203,837 views • 11 days ago

🚨 MICHIGAN — this is exactly why transparency in our elections matters. Macomb county clerk Anthony G. Forlini met with all of his local clerks and they identified a huge problem- major discrepancies involving voter-registration information that included both fraudulent and duplicate voter registrations. Per usual, Jocelyn Benson claims voter fraud in Michigan does not exist while the receipts and proof keep pouring in and showing that it absolutely exists across the entire state. When questions are being raised about voter registrations and whether people are exploiting weaknesses in the system, the answer shouldn’t be outrage at the questions. It should be records, audits, accountability and answers. Election integrity isn’t about which party wins. It’s about making sure every lawful vote is counted once, every registration is legitimate, and the public can verify that the system is working as promised. Watch this. Listen carefully. Then ask the question every Michigan voter should be able to ask: Are we doing everything possible to protect the integrity of our voter rolls and can officials prove it? Because confidence in elections isn’t something government gets to demand from the public. It has to be EARNED through transparency. Your ballot is your opportunity to demand better. Vote for Anthony Forlini to be your next Secretary of State so we can finally fix this broken system 🙌🏻

🚨 MICHIGAN — this is exactly why transparency in our elections matters. Macomb county clerk Anthony G. Forlini met with all of his local clerks and they identified a huge problem- major discrepancies involving voter-registration information that included both fraudulent and duplicate voter registrations. Per usual, Jocelyn Benson claims voter fraud in Michigan does not exist while the receipts and proof keep pouring in and showing that it absolutely exists across the entire state. When questions are being raised about voter registrations and whether people are exploiting weaknesses in the system, the answer shouldn’t be outrage at the questions. It should be records, audits, accountability and answers. Election integrity isn’t about which party wins. It’s about making sure every lawful vote is counted once, every registration is legitimate, and the public can verify that the system is working as promised. Watch this. Listen carefully. Then ask the question every Michigan voter should be able to ask: Are we doing everything possible to protect the integrity of our voter rolls and can officials prove it? Because confidence in elections isn’t something government gets to demand from the public. It has to be EARNED through transparency. Your ballot is your opportunity to demand better. Vote for Anthony Forlini to be your next Secretary of State so we can finally fix this broken system 🙌🏻

Monica Yatooma

22,803 views • 17 days ago

Sometimes satire speaks louder than slogans because it exposes truths that plain speech struggles to make people hear. This discussion cuts to the heart of a deeper question: Who funds politics, and who pays the price? When political parties receive enormous corporate funding but ordinary students must survive on public donations, free drinking water, and basic solidarity while protesting for fair examinations, democracy faces a moral test. Electoral funding should never buy silence, immunity, or unequal accountability. Corruption is not only about stolen money—it is also about a system where financial power shapes whose voices are amplified and whose suffering is ignored. A democracy remains healthy only when governments answer to citizens, not to their biggest donors. The real satire is that those demanding transparent education and equal opportunity must struggle for basic facilities, while those backed by wealth and influence rarely face the same scrutiny. That irony should concern every citizen, regardless of political preference. Link:

Sometimes satire speaks louder than slogans because it exposes truths that plain speech struggles to make people hear. This discussion cuts to the heart of a deeper question: Who funds politics, and who pays the price? When political parties receive enormous corporate funding but ordinary students must survive on public donations, free drinking water, and basic solidarity while protesting for fair examinations, democracy faces a moral test. Electoral funding should never buy silence, immunity, or unequal accountability. Corruption is not only about stolen money—it is also about a system where financial power shapes whose voices are amplified and whose suffering is ignored. A democracy remains healthy only when governments answer to citizens, not to their biggest donors. The real satire is that those demanding transparent education and equal opportunity must struggle for basic facilities, while those backed by wealth and influence rarely face the same scrutiny. That irony should concern every citizen, regardless of political preference. Link:

Ashok Dadhwal

22,894 views • 3 months ago

The Question They Didn't Want Answered - And Why It Matters Even More Today This is one of the more revealing exchanges I've had in Question Period. I asked straightforward questions about government decision-making, lobbying, and conflicts of interest involving the Premier. Instead of answers, I was met with interruptions, insults, and repeated attempts to shut down the discussion. Watch closely. Ask yourself: Why was this question so difficult to answer? And why were they so determined to prevent it from being asked? Since this exchange, Albertans have witnessed controversy after controversy involving sole-source contracts, procurement practices, government appointments, and questions of transparency and accountability. And now, AHS has been ordered by the courts to turn over documents to law enforcement. That development makes this exchange even more relevant. The details may change, but the pattern remains the same. When legitimate questions are raised, this government dodges responsibility. Too often we see deflection, obstruction, and theatrics. Question Period exists for one reason: accountability. Albertans deserve answers, not excuses. Watch this exchange and decide for yourself whether this is the standard of government Alberta deserves. #ableg #abpoli #accountability #ucp #alberta #publictrust #transparancy #abtory

The Question They Didn't Want Answered - And Why It Matters Even More Today This is one of the more revealing exchanges I've had in Question Period. I asked straightforward questions about government decision-making, lobbying, and conflicts of interest involving the Premier. Instead of answers, I was met with interruptions, insults, and repeated attempts to shut down the discussion. Watch closely. Ask yourself: Why was this question so difficult to answer? And why were they so determined to prevent it from being asked? Since this exchange, Albertans have witnessed controversy after controversy involving sole-source contracts, procurement practices, government appointments, and questions of transparency and accountability. And now, AHS has been ordered by the courts to turn over documents to law enforcement. That development makes this exchange even more relevant. The details may change, but the pattern remains the same. When legitimate questions are raised, this government dodges responsibility. Too often we see deflection, obstruction, and theatrics. Question Period exists for one reason: accountability. Albertans deserve answers, not excuses. Watch this exchange and decide for yourself whether this is the standard of government Alberta deserves. #ableg #abpoli #accountability #ucp #alberta #publictrust #transparancy #abtory

Peter Guthrie

11,084 views • 3 months ago

The Presidency appears to be upset because the presidential candidate of the NDC, Peter Obi, called for the resignation of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. It is important to understand that many of the criticisms being made today are not new to Nigerian politics. Similar criticisms and demands were made by opposition figures, including Bola Tinubu himself, during the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan. It is also important for Nigerians to remember that the current President was one of the leading figures of the opposition movement that challenged the government of the day and ultimately contributed to a historic political transition. That is why we must continue to speak up, peacefully and lawfully, in pursuit of a better Nigeria. We should not allow those who exercised their right to criticize previous governments to deny others that same right today. A healthy democracy thrives on accountability, constructive criticism, and the freedom of citizens to express their views without fear. The journey toward a better Nigeria must continue.

The Presidency appears to be upset because the presidential candidate of the NDC, Peter Obi, called for the resignation of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu. It is important to understand that many of the criticisms being made today are not new to Nigerian politics. Similar criticisms and demands were made by opposition figures, including Bola Tinubu himself, during the administration of former President Goodluck Jonathan. It is also important for Nigerians to remember that the current President was one of the leading figures of the opposition movement that challenged the government of the day and ultimately contributed to a historic political transition. That is why we must continue to speak up, peacefully and lawfully, in pursuit of a better Nigeria. We should not allow those who exercised their right to criticize previous governments to deny others that same right today. A healthy democracy thrives on accountability, constructive criticism, and the freedom of citizens to express their views without fear. The journey toward a better Nigeria must continue.

JusticeCrack

18,063 views • 3 months ago

What is happening in the name of SIR across Bengaluru, Hubballi, and many parts of Karnataka is a complete mockery of the electoral process. Instead of mandatory door to door verification by BLOs, people are being herded together like a public gathering and voter verification is being reduced to a farce. This is not SIR. This is an organised subversion of the very purpose for which SIR exists. The Karnataka Congress government appears more interested in protecting its vote bank than protecting the sanctity of electoral rolls. When individual verification is abandoned and mass exercises are encouraged, suspicions of facilitating illegal or dubious entries become inevitable. Democracy cannot function on political convenience, selective scrutiny, and appeasement. The Election Commission must act without delay, cancel every such compromised SIR exercise conducted across Karnataka, and order a fresh, transparent, and strictly rule based verification process. The people of Karnataka deserve clean voter rolls, not an electoral circus orchestrated for partisan gains.

What is happening in the name of SIR across Bengaluru, Hubballi, and many parts of Karnataka is a complete mockery of the electoral process. Instead of mandatory door to door verification by BLOs, people are being herded together like a public gathering and voter verification is being reduced to a farce. This is not SIR. This is an organised subversion of the very purpose for which SIR exists. The Karnataka Congress government appears more interested in protecting its vote bank than protecting the sanctity of electoral rolls. When individual verification is abandoned and mass exercises are encouraged, suspicions of facilitating illegal or dubious entries become inevitable. Democracy cannot function on political convenience, selective scrutiny, and appeasement. The Election Commission must act without delay, cancel every such compromised SIR exercise conducted across Karnataka, and order a fresh, transparent, and strictly rule based verification process. The people of Karnataka deserve clean voter rolls, not an electoral circus orchestrated for partisan gains.

Arvind Bellad

36,215 views • 3 months ago

SUCH IS THE COLLAPSE OF LAW & ORDER IN #BENGAL that individuals now openly claim they have the BJP West Bengal GOVERNMENT ORDER TO HURL EGGS at women, senior citizens, or anyone they choose. Listen to the audacity! When questioned about who authorised him to hurl eggs and assault an elderly man, he unabashedly declares that it is "their government" and that, as the area in-charge, he has orders to do as he pleases. WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE POLITICAL CULTURE BEING ENCOURAGED by BJP? When people begin to believe they enjoy impunity because of political patronage, the rule of law itself stands imperilled. Violence against women, intimidation of the elderly, and attacks on political opponents can never become the new normal. The police administration's silence and inaction raise profound questions about its commitment to uphold the law and protect ordinary citizens. This nightmare must end. The people of Bengal deserve better. Women deserve safety. Our senior citizens deserve to live with dignity and respect.

SUCH IS THE COLLAPSE OF LAW & ORDER IN #BENGAL that individuals now openly claim they have the BJP West Bengal GOVERNMENT ORDER TO HURL EGGS at women, senior citizens, or anyone they choose. Listen to the audacity! When questioned about who authorised him to hurl eggs and assault an elderly man, he unabashedly declares that it is "their government" and that, as the area in-charge, he has orders to do as he pleases. WHAT DOES THIS SAY ABOUT THE POLITICAL CULTURE BEING ENCOURAGED by BJP? When people begin to believe they enjoy impunity because of political patronage, the rule of law itself stands imperilled. Violence against women, intimidation of the elderly, and attacks on political opponents can never become the new normal. The police administration's silence and inaction raise profound questions about its commitment to uphold the law and protect ordinary citizens. This nightmare must end. The people of Bengal deserve better. Women deserve safety. Our senior citizens deserve to live with dignity and respect.

All India Trinamool Congress

28,067 views • 2 months ago

[WATCH] IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION. In the interest of democratic participation and to allow our communities to exercise their fair choice in selecting those they believe will be the best public representatives. Those communities affected we believe should be given the opportunity to participate in the democratic processes. It is not harmful to democracy to allow the investigation into the technical issues to take place. On of the major changes is how the ANC manages the candidate selection process is that there are new requirements, the criteria we use now is much more stringent to ensure that those we send to contest elections are qualifying and wanted by their communities, both in ethical conduct, skills and competence. What that means is that ANC processes of candidates selection are very laborious and we are the first to admit that they are laborious because we involve over a period of time many stakeholders including the community, to those who say why we left things to the eleventh hour we can say categorically we did not. We want to assure our members and communities that those communities and municipalities affected we are dealing with this issue and do find justice in the process and that they will exercise their democratic right. That is why we are asking for a constructive solution with the independent electoral commission and we do believe they will open the door to engagement, it is a Chapter 9 institution it is duty bound to find a solution as long as that solution does not break the law. We are not asking for any changes in our list, we are asking for that portion that was kicked out to be investigated.

[WATCH] IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION. In the interest of democratic participation and to allow our communities to exercise their fair choice in selecting those they believe will be the best public representatives. Those communities affected we believe should be given the opportunity to participate in the democratic processes. It is not harmful to democracy to allow the investigation into the technical issues to take place. On of the major changes is how the ANC manages the candidate selection process is that there are new requirements, the criteria we use now is much more stringent to ensure that those we send to contest elections are qualifying and wanted by their communities, both in ethical conduct, skills and competence. What that means is that ANC processes of candidates selection are very laborious and we are the first to admit that they are laborious because we involve over a period of time many stakeholders including the community, to those who say why we left things to the eleventh hour we can say categorically we did not. We want to assure our members and communities that those communities and municipalities affected we are dealing with this issue and do find justice in the process and that they will exercise their democratic right. That is why we are asking for a constructive solution with the independent electoral commission and we do believe they will open the door to engagement, it is a Chapter 9 institution it is duty bound to find a solution as long as that solution does not break the law. We are not asking for any changes in our list, we are asking for that portion that was kicked out to be investigated.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

66,182 views • 1 month ago

Israel likes to claim that it has equal rights for its Palestinian citizens. But it does not. The neighborhood of Akbara, in Safed has suffered from extreme neglect from the municipality. Their children do not have a local school and are not provided transportation, as required by law to get to school. They are also not hooked up to the sewage system leading to contamination of its water sources, and they are repeatedly denied building permits on their own land and do not have sufficient health services. That is why, as they say in this video, the residents feel like "fifth class citizens."

Israel likes to claim that it has equal rights for its Palestinian citizens. But it does not. The neighborhood of Akbara, in Safed has suffered from extreme neglect from the municipality. Their children do not have a local school and are not provided transportation, as required by law to get to school. They are also not hooked up to the sewage system leading to contamination of its water sources, and they are repeatedly denied building permits on their own land and do not have sufficient health services. That is why, as they say in this video, the residents feel like "fifth class citizens."

Shaiel Ben-Ephraim

15,510 views • 11 days ago

Freedom of expression is a constitutional right. It should not become a right that exists only when it is convenient for those in power. From internet restrictions during political events to arbitrary arrests of journalists and disruptions affecting political communication, the pattern is difficult to ignore. When access to information is restricted and criticism is met with intimidation or prosecution, it is not only individual expression that suffers. Public participation suffers with it. Political rights do not end when a person goes online. For democracy to function, people must be able to speak, question, criticise, organise, and access information without fear. Constitutional rights mean little if exercising them comes at the cost of being silenced.

Freedom of expression is a constitutional right. It should not become a right that exists only when it is convenient for those in power. From internet restrictions during political events to arbitrary arrests of journalists and disruptions affecting political communication, the pattern is difficult to ignore. When access to information is restricted and criticism is met with intimidation or prosecution, it is not only individual expression that suffers. Public participation suffers with it. Political rights do not end when a person goes online. For democracy to function, people must be able to speak, question, criticise, organise, and access information without fear. Constitutional rights mean little if exercising them comes at the cost of being silenced.

Human Rights Commission of Pakistan

12,692 views • 11 days ago