Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🚨 Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6 Astra Sonnet 5.5 is absolutely cooking way better than I expected Astra still has the edge in polish, but Sonnet 5.5 is making this a real competition This Sonnet release could be a BIG one Feel bad for openAI They should respond on Devday...

17,150 görüntüleme • 2 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

Sakshi Sugandhi profil fotoğrafı
Sakshi Sugandhi2 gün önce

The AI race is getting way too competitive 😭

INDIE | KAI profil fotoğrafı
INDIE | KAI1 gün önce

You are spamming with sonnet

Keval Shah profil fotoğrafı
Keval Shah2 gün önce

@Mr_Salio Are there any chances that the pricing of sonnet model will also reduced?

John Herzog profil fotoğrafı
John Herzog2 gün önce

Sonnet 5.5 closing on Astra's polish this close to DevDay puts OpenAI on a short clock

WakeupIndianMen profil fotoğrafı
WakeupIndianMen2 gün önce

Are sonnet and haiku 5.5 releasing on same day?

bertranddo profil fotoğrafı
bertranddo2 gün önce

The model wars will be something to remember What a time to be alive

Rowan profil fotoğrafı
Rowan2 gün önce

Yeah the polish gap is closing fast, honestly. Competition like this just pushes everyone to ship better stuff 🙌

Mehdi profil fotoğrafı
Mehdi2 gün önce

The AI race is getting way out of hand 💀

Benzer Videolar

GPT-5.6 vs GPT-5.5 on my custom spaceship prompt. I gave both models the exact same custom prompt. This is also the same prompt I previously gave to Fable 5. For context, GPT-5.6 Pro worked for 87 minutes, while GPT-5.5 Extra High worked for 34 minutes and 42 seconds. As I’ve said before, based on great authority GPT-5.6 will be an incremental/soldi improvement over GPT-5.5, not a “Fable killer.” My rough expectation has been that it would trade blows with Fable 5 on some benchmarks, maybe win around half depending on the category, but not clearly surpass it overall. And again fable five will have bigger model smell, but this was expected. After testing this coding output, that view feels pretty accurate. GPT-5.6 is clearly better than GPT-5.5 in several visual areas. The lighting, shading, chairs, object details, and exterior of the spaceship looked noticeably stronger. The scene was also easier to test. I do want to give GPT-5.5 credit though. It built out the rooms much much better and the planets looked better than GPT-5.6’s. It was also interesting that both GPT-5.5 and GPT-5.6 produced better-looking planets than Fable 5 in this specific test. The downside with GPT-5.5 was stability. The game was much glitchier and harder to test compared to GPT-5.6. But when it comes to the core of the demo, which is the spaceship itself, Fable 5 still beat both models pretty comfortably. GPT-5.6 is impressive, but from this test, it looks exactly like what I expected which was a meaningful incremental improvement over GPT-5.5, at least for indie game demos, but not something that replaces Fable 5. In collaboration with Chetaslua

Chris

250,919 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce