Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Soren Monroe-Anderson (Soren Monroe-Anderson) explains why Neros' drones win: "Our airframes right now are mostly made out of carbon plates. Carbon is really light and really strong. But it doesn't have some of the advantages of what they were doing with those metal bodies which is that you get... to use it as a heat sink." "We actually do this on our drone now where the bottom plate is an aluminum plate, and we contact the motherboard and the radios with thermal interface material when we close out the drone with that bottom plate, and so that acts as a big heat sink." "It's just a flat plate that is cut into a shape in 2D versus having to be cast or CNC'd, which is just a lot cheaper for mass manufacturing."show more

Molly O’Shea

71,048 subscribers

13,282 views • 13 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

.Neros Technologies just won a $500M-ceiling US Army contract for its Archer FPV drones. CEO Soren Monroe-Anderson (Soren Monroe-Anderson) on why scaling drone production is the hard part and why very few are doing it well. "I think a lot of drone companies or just a lot of companies in the defense tech space sort of claim that they're ready to produce at scale when they're not, like they haven't proved it... And so a lot of the IP is how we build drones, how we test drones, how we design drones for testing, for reliability, for manufacturability, all of the data we've collected is we've built tens of thousands of drones. These are things that you can't just like drop in and replicate... Like it's really not that hard to put together an FPV drone and go demo it and even get like a contract off of that. It's consistent scale production that's hard."

.Neros Technologies just won a $500M-ceiling US Army contract for its Archer FPV drones. CEO Soren Monroe-Anderson (Soren Monroe-Anderson) on why scaling drone production is the hard part and why very few are doing it well. "I think a lot of drone companies or just a lot of companies in the defense tech space sort of claim that they're ready to produce at scale when they're not, like they haven't proved it... And so a lot of the IP is how we build drones, how we test drones, how we design drones for testing, for reliability, for manufacturability, all of the data we've collected is we've built tens of thousands of drones. These are things that you can't just like drop in and replicate... Like it's really not that hard to put together an FPV drone and go demo it and even get like a contract off of that. It's consistent scale production that's hard."

Mo Islam

17,606 views • 1 month ago

The newest version of Neros' Bandit interceptor drone can fly 300 kilometers per hour: "300 is a pretty good spot for taking out typical Shahed drones." "To go after jet-powered Shahed drones, we need to be closer to 400 km/h, so that would be the ideal end state." — Neros Technologies CEO Soren Monroe-Anderson (Soren Monroe-Anderson)

The newest version of Neros' Bandit interceptor drone can fly 300 kilometers per hour: "300 is a pretty good spot for taking out typical Shahed drones." "To go after jet-powered Shahed drones, we need to be closer to 400 km/h, so that would be the ideal end state." — Neros Technologies CEO Soren Monroe-Anderson (Soren Monroe-Anderson)

Molly O’Shea

77,186 views • 13 days ago

China's drone manufacturing capability "I think today China's easily at 100 million drones a year. I mean, they're supplying most of the components to Ukraine and Russia and both sides are gonna use about 7 million FPV's this year. America is in the hundreds of thousands and there is no company that will domestically build 100,000 drones this year. Neros is trying to get close. We'll be over 100,000 run rate by the end of the year. We have to have production capacity in the millions, tens of millions for credible deterrence, but we also want to solve the problems smarter." Soren Monroe-Anderson, CEO of Neros Technologies

China's drone manufacturing capability "I think today China's easily at 100 million drones a year. I mean, they're supplying most of the components to Ukraine and Russia and both sides are gonna use about 7 million FPV's this year. America is in the hundreds of thousands and there is no company that will domestically build 100,000 drones this year. Neros is trying to get close. We'll be over 100,000 run rate by the end of the year. We have to have production capacity in the millions, tens of millions for credible deterrence, but we also want to solve the problems smarter." Soren Monroe-Anderson, CEO of Neros Technologies

Mo Islam

92,153 views • 1 month ago

Justin Thomas was asked about his group getting put on the clock: "We just didn't really agree with it. ... The hard part to me with the whole pace of play thing is that you, there's so much that goes into golf and there's so much that goes into hole to hole in terms of, are you hitting it close, are you able to tap it in, or you have to mark it, stuff like that, to where, are you holding the group up or are you not, to where it's very hard to make that call. And we just didn't agree with it, to be honest. "But we got taken off, and a hole later we were caught up. So it kind of goes to our point of why we didn't think we should of, but it is what it is. It's a part of it."

Justin Thomas was asked about his group getting put on the clock: "We just didn't really agree with it. ... The hard part to me with the whole pace of play thing is that you, there's so much that goes into golf and there's so much that goes into hole to hole in terms of, are you hitting it close, are you able to tap it in, or you have to mark it, stuff like that, to where, are you holding the group up or are you not, to where it's very hard to make that call. And we just didn't agree with it, to be honest. "But we got taken off, and a hole later we were caught up. So it kind of goes to our point of why we didn't think we should of, but it is what it is. It's a part of it."

Cameron Jourdan

619,272 views • 3 months ago

I found this cooling plate on Amazon, and it looks like a gimmick but I ordered it anyway. This thing actually works SO WELL. The heat is all generated next to the cameras on most phones, but the cameras block coolers from reaching it. This metal plate extends so your cooler (sold separately) can absorb the heat coming out of it. The extended plate is freezing cold. (this is not sponsored, just trying to help people with heating problems). #WarzoneMobile #WZM

I found this cooling plate on Amazon, and it looks like a gimmick but I ordered it anyway. This thing actually works SO WELL. The heat is all generated next to the cameras on most phones, but the cameras block coolers from reaching it. This metal plate extends so your cooler (sold separately) can absorb the heat coming out of it. The extended plate is freezing cold. (this is not sponsored, just trying to help people with heating problems). #WarzoneMobile #WZM

Wynnsanity

13,056 views • 2 years ago

We asked Soren Monroe-Anderson to explain the issue of American drone motors. "A lot of US companies are still using Chinese motors, we want to make our own (but currently can't)." "Same thing with cameras and chips. Our long term challenge is to rebuild all the components from the chips level."

We asked Soren Monroe-Anderson to explain the issue of American drone motors. "A lot of US companies are still using Chinese motors, we want to make our own (but currently can't)." "Same thing with cameras and chips. Our long term challenge is to rebuild all the components from the chips level."

TBPN

15,722 views • 1 year ago

Sanders: But there is another vision out there as well—a darker vision. It is a vision which says that we must give up on democracy, that we are too stupid and inept to govern ourselves, and that we must put more and more power into the hands of one man. It is a vision that says we should accept an economy in which a handful of oligarchs have unbelievable wealth while the vast majority of our people struggle to put food on the table. It is a vision that says the only thing that matters in life is the accumulation of money and power—and that it is OK if we lie, cheat, and steal to achieve those goals. It is a vision which says that we must hate each other because of where we were born, hate each other because of a different language someone speaks, hate each other because of differences in the color of our skin, or our religion, or our sexual orientation. It is a vision that foments hatred, division, and more division. It is an Orwellian vision, which says that we must live in a constant state of fear—that we must always have an enemy and that we must always be at war. It is a vision which says that we have unlimited amounts of money for bombs and guns and killing, but never enough money to feed our children, provide affordable housing, or enable our parents to retire with dignity.

Sanders: But there is another vision out there as well—a darker vision. It is a vision which says that we must give up on democracy, that we are too stupid and inept to govern ourselves, and that we must put more and more power into the hands of one man. It is a vision that says we should accept an economy in which a handful of oligarchs have unbelievable wealth while the vast majority of our people struggle to put food on the table. It is a vision that says the only thing that matters in life is the accumulation of money and power—and that it is OK if we lie, cheat, and steal to achieve those goals. It is a vision which says that we must hate each other because of where we were born, hate each other because of a different language someone speaks, hate each other because of differences in the color of our skin, or our religion, or our sexual orientation. It is a vision that foments hatred, division, and more division. It is an Orwellian vision, which says that we must live in a constant state of fear—that we must always have an enemy and that we must always be at war. It is a vision which says that we have unlimited amounts of money for bombs and guns and killing, but never enough money to feed our children, provide affordable housing, or enable our parents to retire with dignity.

Acyn

60,780 views • 5 months ago

🎙️ Ryan Kalkbrenner: "I don't think I ever played any lineups like that in college, and getting to do that with Hannes (Steinbach) is fun. He's a really smart and skilled big, so being able to do some different things out there is really cool. It lets us explore some stuff in our game and our offensive playbook." 🎙️ "It's the NBA, there's gonna be roster turnover, staff turnover... but the culture that Coach (Charles) Lee and ownership and management have set has been really key to our success last year and building into this year. You see it with those guys coming to support us, you see it with the guys on the bench supporting the guys out on the court. We really have a good culture here, and it's a lot of fun to be a part of... the product on the court is just gonna get even better because of that." (📹

🎙️ Ryan Kalkbrenner: "I don't think I ever played any lineups like that in college, and getting to do that with Hannes (Steinbach) is fun. He's a really smart and skilled big, so being able to do some different things out there is really cool. It lets us explore some stuff in our game and our offensive playbook." 🎙️ "It's the NBA, there's gonna be roster turnover, staff turnover... but the culture that Coach (Charles) Lee and ownership and management have set has been really key to our success last year and building into this year. You see it with those guys coming to support us, you see it with the guys on the bench supporting the guys out on the court. We really have a good culture here, and it's a lot of fun to be a part of... the product on the court is just gonna get even better because of that." (📹

r/CharlotteHornets

15,782 views • 1 month ago

CBS environmental correspondent David Schechter rips Lee Zeldin: “I think the biggest risk is that we have a small window to deal with climate change, really. I mean, you know, it is getting smaller and smaller, less than 10 years to level out and reduce our emissions, and we had — and have currently a lot of rules that deal with that. To throw those out would undo a lot of progress that has been made to try to reach these new standards for our country and for the world, and — and we will lose our opportunity to really get ahead of this problem or even stay current with the problem.”

CBS environmental correspondent David Schechter rips Lee Zeldin: “I think the biggest risk is that we have a small window to deal with climate change, really. I mean, you know, it is getting smaller and smaller, less than 10 years to level out and reduce our emissions, and we had — and have currently a lot of rules that deal with that. To throw those out would undo a lot of progress that has been made to try to reach these new standards for our country and for the world, and — and we will lose our opportunity to really get ahead of this problem or even stay current with the problem.”

Curtis Houck

566,272 views • 1 year ago

Tomorrow, we publish a new The Edge Podcast with Robinhood GM of Crypto, Johann Kerbrat. This clip might be the clearest articulation I’ve ever heard on why Ethereum's roadmap is working, and why Robinhood chose to build its own L2 using Arbitrum. + Ethereum offers security, with proven decentralization + New L1s = centralized databases + EVM liquidity is essential for tokenized stocks & RWAs + Arbitrum’s tech stack wins on engineering merit No edits. No spin. Just a major U.S. fintech explaining why they’re building the future of finance on Ethereum. Real validation for those of us who are long term Ethereum/ETH investors. Here is the clip and transcript for Johann answering why Robinhood chose to build its own Ethereum L2: "You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. And for us, we felt excited about this idea where we can control anything that we want to build and we don't have to deal with any other chain to talk to or anything like that. But at the same time, creating the security of a real proper decentralized chain is extremely difficult, as you know. And we basically get that for free with Ethereum. The network has been going on for a very long time now and the security is stable and it's decentralized. And I think that's really the key two points that we wanted to have. When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created, it's not really decentralized and it's not really secure. So at the end of the day, you're basically having like a... fancy database that is probably a bit slower to use than an actual database. And so we didn't really see the value in that. With Ethereum, we get the security by default. The second thing that we get by having an L2 is that you get all this liquidity that is already part of all the EVM compatible chains. And that was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market onto the chain, we need to have this liquidity. It's not going to be possible if it's in a closed loop or in a closed chain that nobody can access and you need to have like 20 different hoops before you can bridge to that chain. So for us, that was kind of the two elements that we really wanted to focus on and that's why we decided on building on Ethereum. And then we decided on Arbitrum mostly because we love the technology. There's a few things that we are excited about. For example, Stylus. It's a way that we can basically use different language into the chain and we can build on top of that. We also like the way that they prioritize transactions that is, we think, a better way than some of the competition. And so basically we'll use the Arbitrum stack and we'll create our own L2, which will make us also compatible with all the Arbitrum chains. And so we think it's kind of the best of all the worlds. But for us, the idea is like we will start with public stock, and then we think that we can tokenize anything really, not just stocks. It can be private stock, it can be art, it can be real estate, whatever you want to think of. And so we really wanted to have a platform that is kind of easy to build on and we can keep adding on it. At the same time, we know that regulation are going to be hard on some of these products, especially when it comes to financial products. You always have different regulators. You have different rules depending on the region. If you're in the EU versus the US versus LATAM. And so we felt like we wanted to have our own layer that we could customize for these needs. And then anyone that is building on the chain will also be able to benefit from what we are building, versus just putting everything in a contract that will be just good for the people that are using the Robinhood contracts. But so at this point, we announced the chain in June. We are in private test right now, and then we'll do more announcements in the future." Subscribe for the full episode tomorrow! ► Newsletter: ► Spotify: ► Apple: ► Youtube: ► Pods:

Tomorrow, we publish a new The Edge Podcast with Robinhood GM of Crypto, Johann Kerbrat. This clip might be the clearest articulation I’ve ever heard on why Ethereum's roadmap is working, and why Robinhood chose to build its own L2 using Arbitrum. + Ethereum offers security, with proven decentralization + New L1s = centralized databases + EVM liquidity is essential for tokenized stocks & RWAs + Arbitrum’s tech stack wins on engineering merit No edits. No spin. Just a major U.S. fintech explaining why they’re building the future of finance on Ethereum. Real validation for those of us who are long term Ethereum/ETH investors. Here is the clip and transcript for Johann answering why Robinhood chose to build its own Ethereum L2: "You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. And for us, we felt excited about this idea where we can control anything that we want to build and we don't have to deal with any other chain to talk to or anything like that. But at the same time, creating the security of a real proper decentralized chain is extremely difficult, as you know. And we basically get that for free with Ethereum. The network has been going on for a very long time now and the security is stable and it's decentralized. And I think that's really the key two points that we wanted to have. When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created, it's not really decentralized and it's not really secure. So at the end of the day, you're basically having like a... fancy database that is probably a bit slower to use than an actual database. And so we didn't really see the value in that. With Ethereum, we get the security by default. The second thing that we get by having an L2 is that you get all this liquidity that is already part of all the EVM compatible chains. And that was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market onto the chain, we need to have this liquidity. It's not going to be possible if it's in a closed loop or in a closed chain that nobody can access and you need to have like 20 different hoops before you can bridge to that chain. So for us, that was kind of the two elements that we really wanted to focus on and that's why we decided on building on Ethereum. And then we decided on Arbitrum mostly because we love the technology. There's a few things that we are excited about. For example, Stylus. It's a way that we can basically use different language into the chain and we can build on top of that. We also like the way that they prioritize transactions that is, we think, a better way than some of the competition. And so basically we'll use the Arbitrum stack and we'll create our own L2, which will make us also compatible with all the Arbitrum chains. And so we think it's kind of the best of all the worlds. But for us, the idea is like we will start with public stock, and then we think that we can tokenize anything really, not just stocks. It can be private stock, it can be art, it can be real estate, whatever you want to think of. And so we really wanted to have a platform that is kind of easy to build on and we can keep adding on it. At the same time, we know that regulation are going to be hard on some of these products, especially when it comes to financial products. You always have different regulators. You have different rules depending on the region. If you're in the EU versus the US versus LATAM. And so we felt like we wanted to have our own layer that we could customize for these needs. And then anyone that is building on the chain will also be able to benefit from what we are building, versus just putting everything in a contract that will be just good for the people that are using the Robinhood contracts. But so at this point, we announced the chain in June. We are in private test right now, and then we'll do more announcements in the future." Subscribe for the full episode tomorrow! ► Newsletter: ► Spotify: ► Apple: ► Youtube: ► Pods:

DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth

62,600 views • 8 months ago

Not only did he cover he plate number, it's an electronic cover that he could use a remote to close, he got a fake ID claiming he's an appointee of the Government with forged documents. We are reiterating that the use of covered plate numbers is banned, only pennant officers or officials are allowed to cover their plate numbers when it's past 6 PM.

Not only did he cover he plate number, it's an electronic cover that he could use a remote to close, he got a fake ID claiming he's an appointee of the Government with forged documents. We are reiterating that the use of covered plate numbers is banned, only pennant officers or officials are allowed to cover their plate numbers when it's past 6 PM.

SP Bright Edafe

324,354 views • 10 months ago

“You have to mine it out of the ground. You then turn it into a gas for enrichment. You then enrich it — which is essentially a refining process. So enrichment is separating the element of uranium into its two or a couple of different types based on its isotope, which is how many neutrons it has. It’s really a refining, separation process. A lot of people hear ‘enrichment’ and they think there’s going to be a lot of radiation or dangerous chemical reactions. It’s actually just separation." “Cold War era. We were the world leader in enrichment. We had these plants spread out throughout the country that used an old technique that was expensive. It required a lot of energy to do it. But we had the most capacity. Then we built up a lot of enriched uranium that we stockpiled, and those stockpiles..." Scott Nolan

“You have to mine it out of the ground. You then turn it into a gas for enrichment. You then enrich it — which is essentially a refining process. So enrichment is separating the element of uranium into its two or a couple of different types based on its isotope, which is how many neutrons it has. It’s really a refining, separation process. A lot of people hear ‘enrichment’ and they think there’s going to be a lot of radiation or dangerous chemical reactions. It’s actually just separation." “Cold War era. We were the world leader in enrichment. We had these plants spread out throughout the country that used an old technique that was expensive. It required a lot of energy to do it. But we had the most capacity. Then we built up a lot of enriched uranium that we stockpiled, and those stockpiles..." Scott Nolan

Shawn Ryan

104,536 views • 1 year ago

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

American Surgeon shows the actual letter from UnitedHealthcare DENYING a patient in emergency condition from receiving care “This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms” “I think we all knew this would happen. I had another patient come in and share with me that UnitedHealthcare denied her inpatient's day. So this is a patient who had shortness of breath and some chest pain, and she just knew that something wasn't right in her body. She had a family history of blood clots and she'd had a deep flap surgery a couple of weeks ago. She went to the hospital and they saw her and they found that she had a life threatening condition known as pulmonary embolisms. So she was admitted to the hospital and taken care of really well by the doctors there. And they ordered all the right things. After a couple of days, she was discharged. She got a letter from UnitedHealthcare explaining that they didn't agree with the level of her care and that they would not cover it. So I'm gonna share some of the language of that letter with you, and I want you to know that my patient that we talked about previously who had her surgery denied had almost exactly the same letter shared. So there's some troubling things in this letter. I think this term is really interesting. United is saying they reviewed the request for inpatient admission. So let's all just pause and consider that. This is a woman who was in the emergency room with pulmonary embolisms, and the doctor wasn't really requesting anything. They were saying this patient needs to be in the hospital. But an insurance company sees this as a request, and that's part of this prior auth environment that we're living in. So I think it's important as patients and as physicians to just acknowledge that this is our reality now. Someone can think that there's a good medical decision for you and can write orders and wanna do the right thing for you, but your insurance company is seeing that as a request and deciding whether or not they wanna do it. One of the criteria that this insurance company used to decide whether or not to accept or deny this request was whether it's medically necessary. And it's so interesting that we're letting insurance companies and the doctors who work for insurance companies determine what's medically necessary and not just the doctor in front of the patient in the emergency room. So this is a really bold statement from UnitedHealthcare for my patient. They say you did not have to be admitted as an inpatient to the hospital for this care. I think we all need to just reflect on that. An insurance company is telling a patient and her doctor that they disagree with the plan of care to keep that patient safe. I know that this is boiling down to whether it's an inpatient admission or an observation admission, and that's really about money. But what I wanna point out to you is they're making medical decisions. This insurance company is actually weighing in and disagreeing with a doctor who made a medical decision to admit this patient for her safety. So this specific sentence, when a doctor or facility treats a patient above the recommended level of care, we cannot cover it. What the heck? That's what we do. We go above and beyond as physicians. It's clear that insurance companies don't, and they're actually saying it here.”

Wall Street Apes

115,712 views • 1 year ago

This is a perfect example of “how a catcher receives a pitch can greatly affect what the umpire sees and what they call it.” A lot of people argue that what we do as catchers doesn’t matter and a strike is a strike due to where it crosses the plate. I’m a firm believer (Cont.)

This is a perfect example of “how a catcher receives a pitch can greatly affect what the umpire sees and what they call it.” A lot of people argue that what we do as catchers doesn’t matter and a strike is a strike due to where it crosses the plate. I’m a firm believer (Cont.)

The Catching Guy

92,344 views • 4 months ago

Nashon Kondiwa: The dealer's plate is for licensed dealers. The issue of KD plates is not, for me, a very big conversation. Since I became DG, I have tried to clean up the backlog of plates, which I found to be over 30,000 plates that Kenyans have paid for but have never been printed. As we speak, I have 5000 in three months, and this has impacted the cash flows and delays that we are currently experiencing, though we will sort it out within the next 3 days #CitizenMondayReport

Nashon Kondiwa: The dealer's plate is for licensed dealers. The issue of KD plates is not, for me, a very big conversation. Since I became DG, I have tried to clean up the backlog of plates, which I found to be over 30,000 plates that Kenyans have paid for but have never been printed. As we speak, I have 5000 in three months, and this has impacted the cash flows and delays that we are currently experiencing, though we will sort it out within the next 3 days #CitizenMondayReport

Citizen TV Kenya

13,893 views • 2 months ago