Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

SpaceXAI just released a free Grok Bot workshop 54 minutes on running bots like a product org: 03:37 - stop babysitting threads, use a coordinator 13:32 - split bots into specialists, like a company 23:59 - one agent answers several questions in parallel 30:08 - shared context, zero copy-pasting... between agents 40:40 - the em agent learned to delegate and review But every routing decision there comes back as a paragraph from a frontier model Who takes it, what to check, who signs off. All prose That's not intelligence architecture Jev returns typed options plus a probability for $0.042 per 1M input tokens. Zero sentences LLM creates the work → Jev decides next → code enforces it Save this before you build another coordinator agent 👇show more

spect

13,103 subscribers

13,782 просмотров • 6 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 8

Фото профиля ieatded

ieatded6 дней назад

wow just 54 minutes but so useful

Фото профиля distort

distort6 дней назад

a workshop like this is just what you need to watch in the evening

Фото профиля beamnxw ./

beamnxw ./6 дней назад

saved ser

Фото профиля Abdurrahim TÜRK

Abdurrahim TÜRK5 дней назад

It's all a lie, he failed at every single task I gave him.

Фото профиля whemo

whemo6 дней назад

as i know they did a lot of job to understand how grok bot works

Фото профиля Berk Aladag

Berk Aladag5 дней назад

really cool

Фото профиля broke boy

broke boy6 дней назад

amazing WS

Фото профиля Bret Patton

Bret Patton5 дней назад

This is fascinating. I definitely see real value in everyday life #grokbot @GrokBot

Похожие видео

SpaceXAI just released a free 53-minute Grok Bot workshop their GTM team shows exactly how they run a team of bots: 01:11 - give every bot one clear job 06:38 - automate inbox + meeting prep 08:01 - automate prospect research + outreach 19:35 - split work between specialized bots 37:04 - run multiple tasks in parallel 51:35 - onboard bots like real employees the setup: role → tools → skill → feedback → routine most people are still building one giant agent SpaceXAI is building a team save this before you build another coordinator bot 👇

SpaceXAI just released a free 53-minute Grok Bot workshop their GTM team shows exactly how they run a team of bots: 01:11 - give every bot one clear job 06:38 - automate inbox + meeting prep 08:01 - automate prospect research + outreach 19:35 - split work between specialized bots 37:04 - run multiple tasks in parallel 51:35 - onboard bots like real employees the setup: role → tools → skill → feedback → routine most people are still building one giant agent SpaceXAI is building a team save this before you build another coordinator bot 👇

spect

609,701 просмотров • 5 дней назад

this is pure f*cking treasure 10 GitHub projects that put Jev between your agent and every decision your agent should stop paying a frontier model to answer yes or no ROUTE THE WORK 01 jev-router > 02 jcm-router > 03 jev-agent-skill-router > GUARD EVERY ACTION 04 pi-heed > 05 fx > 06 Foreman > SCORE WHAT MATTERS 07 LlamaIndex Jev > 08 citation-verifier > PUT IT TO WORK 09 yoshi > 10 mastra-jev-moderation > the loop: your agent hits a fork > Jev answers with a probability > your code decides what that number allows > the agent moves on 3 builds I'd explore: coding agent: jev-router > fx > Foreman > yoshi support desk: jev-agent-skill-router > mastra-jev-moderation > LlamaIndex Jev research: jcm-router > pi-heed > citation-verifier save this, then build a decision layer for your agents ⭣

this is pure f*cking treasure 10 GitHub projects that put Jev between your agent and every decision your agent should stop paying a frontier model to answer yes or no ROUTE THE WORK 01 jev-router > 02 jcm-router > 03 jev-agent-skill-router > GUARD EVERY ACTION 04 pi-heed > 05 fx > 06 Foreman > SCORE WHAT MATTERS 07 LlamaIndex Jev > 08 citation-verifier > PUT IT TO WORK 09 yoshi > 10 mastra-jev-moderation > the loop: your agent hits a fork > Jev answers with a probability > your code decides what that number allows > the agent moves on 3 builds I'd explore: coding agent: jev-router > fx > Foreman > yoshi support desk: jev-agent-skill-router > mastra-jev-moderation > LlamaIndex Jev research: jcm-router > pi-heed > citation-verifier save this, then build a decision layer for your agents ⭣

delost

15,734 просмотров • 11 дней назад

A SpaceXAI engineer just released a free 30-min course on Grok Bot Agents: from your first persistent agent to multi-agent chains that research, ship software, and hand work off to Cursor 05:26 - what actually lives inside a Grok agent 08:49 - the 3 ways to run agents 12:04 - chaining multiple agents into one workflow 16:06 - turning X followers into structured research inside Notion 23:08 - handing coding work from Grok straight to Cursor Most people still treat Grok like a chat window. It answers, you copy, you move on. The shift happens when the agents stop waiting for you: one finds the information, one structures it in Notion, one turns it into working code, and they pass the work down the line on their own. Thirty minutes here beats assembling your setup one agent at a time.

A SpaceXAI engineer just released a free 30-min course on Grok Bot Agents: from your first persistent agent to multi-agent chains that research, ship software, and hand work off to Cursor 05:26 - what actually lives inside a Grok agent 08:49 - the 3 ways to run agents 12:04 - chaining multiple agents into one workflow 16:06 - turning X followers into structured research inside Notion 23:08 - handing coding work from Grok straight to Cursor Most people still treat Grok like a chat window. It answers, you copy, you move on. The shift happens when the agents stop waiting for you: one finds the information, one structures it in Notion, one turns it into working code, and they pass the work down the line on their own. Thirty minutes here beats assembling your setup one agent at a time.

Morlex

16,710 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

honestly this should be f*cking illegal your LLM takes 30 seconds to think about a trade, but candle closed 29 seconds ago. Jev answers in 70 to 500 milliseconds. it can't write a word. it returns BUY / SELL / HOLD and a probability, and that's all a scalp needs. 3 repos already built on it: -> jev-trader: one AI trade decision every single block, on a live MON-USDC market -> QuantDinger: a full open-source AI trading OS with Jev built in. research, strategy, agent trading -> AIStock: "one person can become their own super-analyst" $0.042 per million input tokens. output is free. that's thousands of decisions for the price of one LLM call. the catch: fast is not the same as right. a wrong call in 200 milliseconds is still a wrong call. paper trade it first. > let the big model do the research. > let Jev pull the trigger. > let code set the stop. bookmark this before your bot is the slow one in the room.

honestly this should be f*cking illegal your LLM takes 30 seconds to think about a trade, but candle closed 29 seconds ago. Jev answers in 70 to 500 milliseconds. it can't write a word. it returns BUY / SELL / HOLD and a probability, and that's all a scalp needs. 3 repos already built on it: -> jev-trader: one AI trade decision every single block, on a live MON-USDC market -> QuantDinger: a full open-source AI trading OS with Jev built in. research, strategy, agent trading -> AIStock: "one person can become their own super-analyst" $0.042 per million input tokens. output is free. that's thousands of decisions for the price of one LLM call. the catch: fast is not the same as right. a wrong call in 200 milliseconds is still a wrong call. paper trade it first. > let the big model do the research. > let Jev pull the trigger. > let code set the stop. bookmark this before your bot is the slow one in the room.

kiosa

82,972 просмотров • 1 день назад

SpaceXAI just released free 1-hour course on Grok Bot Agents: 1 prompt → CEO bot → agent teams → full 24/7 system from 0% to 100%: 0% → 2:15 - build your first Grok Bot 25% → 6:52 - give every Bot a role 50% → 16:51 - teach Bots to work 24/7 75% → 31:50 - run agent teams in parallel 100% → 52:18 - full system that automate your life most agent tutorials give you a chatbot that waits for prompts - this one builds a 24/7 team that works while your laptop is closed - by team who build it watch it, build one Bot, turn it into a team - then read the full Grok Bot architecture below ↓

SpaceXAI just released free 1-hour course on Grok Bot Agents: 1 prompt → CEO bot → agent teams → full 24/7 system from 0% to 100%: 0% → 2:15 - build your first Grok Bot 25% → 6:52 - give every Bot a role 50% → 16:51 - teach Bots to work 24/7 75% → 31:50 - run agent teams in parallel 100% → 52:18 - full system that automate your life most agent tutorials give you a chatbot that waits for prompts - this one builds a 24/7 team that works while your laptop is closed - by team who build it watch it, build one Bot, turn it into a team - then read the full Grok Bot architecture below ↓

codila

294,284 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

$this harness stack is f*cking gold TypeSafe AI + LangChain finally dropped the layer that makes agents affordable at company scale: jev running inside the langchain agent loop as middleware the problem every big team hits: each fork in the loop is another full LLM call. at 10 agents that's a bill. at 10,000 it's the budget > routing before: every task goes to the frontier model now: jev picks the least costly model that can finish it. lookups go fast, architecture goes powerful > guardrails before: the "is this command dangerous?" check sat in the closed parts of claude code, codex, cursor now: AutoModeMiddleware(tools=["bash"]). one line, any agent, blocked before the tool runs > decisions before: one LLM call per question now: every question about the same state in one request, answered in parallel > audit before: "the model decided" now: the answer, the probability and the confidence stay in agent state > adoption no rewrite. pip install langchain-typesafe and drop it into the agent you already run TypeSafe reports up to 200x faster inference and 400x lower cost than comparable LLMs on classification. the LLM still reasons and writes. jev takes the thousands of small calls in between already live: browserbase agents for fractions of a cent, a live trading agent, email triage at scale full loop mapped below: 7 agents, 4 jev gates per step count the forks in your agent loop tonigh$

this harness stack is f*cking gold TypeSafe AI + LangChain finally dropped the layer that makes agents affordable at company scale: jev running inside the langchain agent loop as middleware the problem every big team hits: each fork in the loop is another full LLM call. at 10 agents that's a bill. at 10,000 it's the budget > routing before: every task goes to the frontier model now: jev picks the least costly model that can finish it. lookups go fast, architecture goes powerful > guardrails before: the "is this command dangerous?" check sat in the closed parts of claude code, codex, cursor now: AutoModeMiddleware(tools=["bash"]). one line, any agent, blocked before the tool runs > decisions before: one LLM call per question now: every question about the same state in one request, answered in parallel > audit before: "the model decided" now: the answer, the probability and the confidence stay in agent state > adoption no rewrite. pip install langchain-typesafe and drop it into the agent you already run TypeSafe reports up to 200x faster inference and 400x lower cost than comparable LLMs on classification. the LLM still reasons and writes. jev takes the thousands of small calls in between already live: browserbase agents for fractions of a cent, a live trading agent, email triage at scale full loop mapped below: 7 agents, 4 jev gates per step count the forks in your agent loop tonigh

NO1ennn

31,666 просмотров • 9 дней назад

SpaceXAI engineer just dropped 1-hour Grok Bot workshop: 1 prompt → CEO bot → agent teams → 100% of daily and business tasks from 0% to 100%: 0% → 3:30 - build your first Grok Bot 25% → 6:52 - give every Bot a role 50% → 16:51 - give bots tools and context 75% → 31:50 - run agent teams in parallel 100% → 52:18 - full system that automate business and life most courses just tell you what Grok Bot is - but this is a real case study from an engineer on the SpaceXAI team who automated her life - and you can do the same watch it, build your first CEO Bot, turn it into a team - then read the full Grok Bot workflow below ↓

SpaceXAI engineer just dropped 1-hour Grok Bot workshop: 1 prompt → CEO bot → agent teams → 100% of daily and business tasks from 0% to 100%: 0% → 3:30 - build your first Grok Bot 25% → 6:52 - give every Bot a role 50% → 16:51 - give bots tools and context 75% → 31:50 - run agent teams in parallel 100% → 52:18 - full system that automate business and life most courses just tell you what Grok Bot is - but this is a real case study from an engineer on the SpaceXAI team who automated her life - and you can do the same watch it, build your first CEO Bot, turn it into a team - then read the full Grok Bot workflow below ↓

codila

108,984 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Everyone is talking about JEV. Almost nobody knows how to actually use it. These 10 GitHub repos fix that. 1. browser-use/jev-ultrafast (~16.6k⭐) Jev for browser agents: pick the next action without another expensive LLM call. 2. tamaratran/fast-jev-compaction (~6.5k⭐) Uses Jev to decide what context still matters and what can be dropped. 3. TheoLeeCJ/SemIf (~4k⭐) Open-source Jev-style decision making you can run locally. 4. jarrodwatts/jev-trader (~2.1k⭐) Real-time trading loop where Jev decides buy, sell or wait. 5. kerpopule/hermes-jev-skills (~670⭐) Jev routing, memory, compaction and skill selection for AI agents. 6. devagrawal09/jev-review (~570⭐) Code review powered by Jev decisions instead of one giant prompt. 7. thruwire/foreman (~520⭐) Jev as a supervisor for coding agents: continue, retry, verify or stop. 8. superagents-lab/jev-search (~400⭐) Jev decides where and how an agent should search. 9. droidrun/mobile-jev (~350⭐) Jev for Android agents choosing the next app action. 10. gargpratyush/jev-router (~340⭐) Routes agent tasks to the right model with Jev. After looking through these, the pattern is pretty clear: LLMs generate. Agents execute. JEV decides. That decision layer is what most agent stacks are still missing. Save this if you want to integrate Jev into your workflow👇

Everyone is talking about JEV. Almost nobody knows how to actually use it. These 10 GitHub repos fix that. 1. browser-use/jev-ultrafast (~16.6k⭐) Jev for browser agents: pick the next action without another expensive LLM call. 2. tamaratran/fast-jev-compaction (~6.5k⭐) Uses Jev to decide what context still matters and what can be dropped. 3. TheoLeeCJ/SemIf (~4k⭐) Open-source Jev-style decision making you can run locally. 4. jarrodwatts/jev-trader (~2.1k⭐) Real-time trading loop where Jev decides buy, sell or wait. 5. kerpopule/hermes-jev-skills (~670⭐) Jev routing, memory, compaction and skill selection for AI agents. 6. devagrawal09/jev-review (~570⭐) Code review powered by Jev decisions instead of one giant prompt. 7. thruwire/foreman (~520⭐) Jev as a supervisor for coding agents: continue, retry, verify or stop. 8. superagents-lab/jev-search (~400⭐) Jev decides where and how an agent should search. 9. droidrun/mobile-jev (~350⭐) Jev for Android agents choosing the next app action. 10. gargpratyush/jev-router (~340⭐) Routes agent tasks to the right model with Jev. After looking through these, the pattern is pretty clear: LLMs generate. Agents execute. JEV decides. That decision layer is what most agent stacks are still missing. Save this if you want to integrate Jev into your workflow👇

unicode

20,745 просмотров • 15 дней назад

$Holy crap, who the hell did this?!! Someone open-sourced a Jev-powered second brain for AI agents and lets you plug it straight into your own agent. GitHub's already at 925 stars, repo's called Hermes-Jev-Skills. You just run one install command, and Jev takes over every tiny decision your agent burns premium tokens on. Which model answers, which skill to load, which memories matter, what survives when context gets cut. Give it your computer or browser and it'll pick the next click, but only from actions you already marked safe. It'll sort your inbox into lanes, strip hidden prompt injections out of search results, and triage every message in ~0.4 seconds. Claude Code and Codex support - they threw that in too. No dependencies, no patching Hermes core, and your API key never touches the agent Link's right here: The catch? Jev itself is a paid cloud API. The skills run on your machine; the decisions don't. But hey, a decision costs a fraction of a cent, everything fails open if Jev goes down, and your expensive model finally gets to do only the thinking. Who needs a damn frontier model picking which file to open!$

Holy crap, who the hell did this?!! Someone open-sourced a Jev-powered second brain for AI agents and lets you plug it straight into your own agent. GitHub's already at 925 stars, repo's called Hermes-Jev-Skills. You just run one install command, and Jev takes over every tiny decision your agent burns premium tokens on. Which model answers, which skill to load, which memories matter, what survives when context gets cut. Give it your computer or browser and it'll pick the next click, but only from actions you already marked safe. It'll sort your inbox into lanes, strip hidden prompt injections out of search results, and triage every message in ~0.4 seconds. Claude Code and Codex support - they threw that in too. No dependencies, no patching Hermes core, and your API key never touches the agent Link's right here: The catch? Jev itself is a paid cloud API. The skills run on your machine; the decisions don't. But hey, a decision costs a fraction of a cent, everything fails open if Jev goes down, and your expensive model finally gets to do only the thinking. Who needs a damn frontier model picking which file to open!

Archive

16,841 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Top 9 agentic use cases for Jev: (bookmark this) Jev handles semantic decisions that ordinary code cannot express reliably. It returns typed answers and probabilities, while code continues to cover the workflow. Here are 9 practical use cases for Jev: 1. Browser next action > Convert the current DOM state into a bounded action such as click, type, or stop. Code executes only valid operation-target pairs. There are already several open-source Jev web agents. 2. Context compaction > Decide which events from a long agent trace should remain. The selected text stays verbatim instead of being replaced with a generated summary. 3. Skill and context loading > Compare the current user turn against the available skills. Load only the instructions needed for that turn instead of filling the context window with every skill. 4. Typed tool-call compilation > Map a natural-language request to a function and fill its typed arguments. Each argument is evaluated separately before code allows execution. 5. Citation verification > Check whether a quoted passage exists and whether the surrounding evidence supports the claim. The output can be supported, unsupported, or contradicted. 6. Extraction verification > Run a cheap extractor first, then use Jev to verify questionable fields. Clean records stay on the fast path while uncertain ones reach a reasoning model. 7. Agent trace evaluation > Turn raw trajectories into queryable labels such as progress and repetition. This avoids asking another LLM to write a full review of every run. 8. Semantic regression tests > Replay a trace suite against a new agent build. Semantic checks can then pass or block prompt, model, tool, and policy changes in CI. 9. Jevgrep code search > Search a codebase by what the code does rather than its exact words. Jev scores candidate snippets and returns the most relevant code first. If you want to see the final pattern in practice, it is already implemented in the Beacon open-source project. It captures full sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and 20+ agent harnesses, and then Jev identifies which workflows and corrections are worth learning from, so that a lesson discovered by one agent can become available to the others. GitHub repo: If you want to dive deeper, check out the full guide on Jev below ↓

Top 9 agentic use cases for Jev: (bookmark this) Jev handles semantic decisions that ordinary code cannot express reliably. It returns typed answers and probabilities, while code continues to cover the workflow. Here are 9 practical use cases for Jev: 1. Browser next action > Convert the current DOM state into a bounded action such as click, type, or stop. Code executes only valid operation-target pairs. There are already several open-source Jev web agents. 2. Context compaction > Decide which events from a long agent trace should remain. The selected text stays verbatim instead of being replaced with a generated summary. 3. Skill and context loading > Compare the current user turn against the available skills. Load only the instructions needed for that turn instead of filling the context window with every skill. 4. Typed tool-call compilation > Map a natural-language request to a function and fill its typed arguments. Each argument is evaluated separately before code allows execution. 5. Citation verification > Check whether a quoted passage exists and whether the surrounding evidence supports the claim. The output can be supported, unsupported, or contradicted. 6. Extraction verification > Run a cheap extractor first, then use Jev to verify questionable fields. Clean records stay on the fast path while uncertain ones reach a reasoning model. 7. Agent trace evaluation > Turn raw trajectories into queryable labels such as progress and repetition. This avoids asking another LLM to write a full review of every run. 8. Semantic regression tests > Replay a trace suite against a new agent build. Semantic checks can then pass or block prompt, model, tool, and policy changes in CI. 9. Jevgrep code search > Search a codebase by what the code does rather than its exact words. Jev scores candidate snippets and returns the most relevant code first. If you want to see the final pattern in practice, it is already implemented in the Beacon open-source project. It captures full sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, OpenCode, and 20+ agent harnesses, and then Jev identifies which workflows and corrections are worth learning from, so that a lesson discovered by one agent can become available to the others. GitHub repo: If you want to dive deeper, check out the full guide on Jev below ↓

rody

47,040 просмотров • 10 дней назад

Jev + LLMs is f*cking insane... this free Jev lab is a clean blueprint for agent builders one support ticket enters. Jev reads the state and answers three typed questions in one call: noul → is it urgent? choice → which team owns it? score → how soon does it need action? then code reads the probabilities. clear, low-risk work flows to the right LLM. ambiguous tickets go to a person. refunds wait for approval. the draft gets checked against policy before it goes out the loop: ticket → typed questions → probabilities → threshold → LLM draft → approval / reply check → shadow run the best part of the lab: you can break the system yourself. set the threshold to zero, remove the “other” choice, watch routing fail, then repair it. the final exercise runs Jev beside existing rules on 40 tickets without letting it act the practical rule: Jev for bounded judgments, an LLM for writing, plain code for hard constraints save this, then read the article below to combine Jev with Dots ⭣

Jev + LLMs is f*cking insane... this free Jev lab is a clean blueprint for agent builders one support ticket enters. Jev reads the state and answers three typed questions in one call: noul → is it urgent? choice → which team owns it? score → how soon does it need action? then code reads the probabilities. clear, low-risk work flows to the right LLM. ambiguous tickets go to a person. refunds wait for approval. the draft gets checked against policy before it goes out the loop: ticket → typed questions → probabilities → threshold → LLM draft → approval / reply check → shadow run the best part of the lab: you can break the system yourself. set the threshold to zero, remove the “other” choice, watch routing fail, then repair it. the final exercise runs Jev beside existing rules on 40 tickets without letting it act the practical rule: Jev for bounded judgments, an LLM for writing, plain code for hard constraints save this, then read the article below to combine Jev with Dots ⭣

beamnxw ./

11,130 просмотров • 7 дней назад

this is unreal f*cking gold for Jev builders 20 repos people are building on Jev right now. browser agents, context tools, trading bots, even a drone 1. JEV-Ultrafast - a fast browser agent ↳ 2. Fast-JEV-Compaction - context compression ↳ 3. JSON-Render - generative UI ↳ 4. Typesafe-MCP - use Jev with any client ↳ 5. JEV-MCP - a judgment toolkit ↳ 6. Semdecide - a classifier that lives in your CLI ↳ 7. JEV-Codex-Router - routes each task to the right model ↳ 8. Winnow - garbage collection for your context ↳ 9. JEV-Review - code review triage ↳ 10. Blink - a repo navigator ↳ 11. Agent-Desktop - desktop automation ↳ 12. Typesafe-Mario - an agent that plays Super Mario ↳ 13. JEV-Drone - drone control ↳ 14. OneVOneJev - a browser FPS ↳ 15. JEV-Trader - HFT market making ↳ 16. Prism - liquidity signal detection ↳ 17. Neo4Jev - knowledge graph traversal ↳ 18. JEV-Curate - training data screening ↳ 19. Canny - checks whether a task was actually completed ↳ 20. KillMyIdea - scores startup ideas before you build them ↳ pick by what you do: > coding -> JEV-Review, Blink, Canny, JEV-Codex-Router > context -> Fast-JEV-Compaction, Winnow > automation -> JEV-Ultrafast, Agent-Desktop > clients and tools -> Typesafe-MCP, JEV-MCP, Semdecide > UI -> JSON-Render > trading -> JEV-Trader, Prism > data -> Neo4Jev, JEV-Curate > founders -> KillMyIdea > just for fun -> Typesafe-Mario, OneVOneJev, JEV-Drone grab the one closest to your job and ship something on top of it this week

this is unreal f*cking gold for Jev builders 20 repos people are building on Jev right now. browser agents, context tools, trading bots, even a drone 1. JEV-Ultrafast - a fast browser agent ↳ 2. Fast-JEV-Compaction - context compression ↳ 3. JSON-Render - generative UI ↳ 4. Typesafe-MCP - use Jev with any client ↳ 5. JEV-MCP - a judgment toolkit ↳ 6. Semdecide - a classifier that lives in your CLI ↳ 7. JEV-Codex-Router - routes each task to the right model ↳ 8. Winnow - garbage collection for your context ↳ 9. JEV-Review - code review triage ↳ 10. Blink - a repo navigator ↳ 11. Agent-Desktop - desktop automation ↳ 12. Typesafe-Mario - an agent that plays Super Mario ↳ 13. JEV-Drone - drone control ↳ 14. OneVOneJev - a browser FPS ↳ 15. JEV-Trader - HFT market making ↳ 16. Prism - liquidity signal detection ↳ 17. Neo4Jev - knowledge graph traversal ↳ 18. JEV-Curate - training data screening ↳ 19. Canny - checks whether a task was actually completed ↳ 20. KillMyIdea - scores startup ideas before you build them ↳ pick by what you do: > coding -> JEV-Review, Blink, Canny, JEV-Codex-Router > context -> Fast-JEV-Compaction, Winnow > automation -> JEV-Ultrafast, Agent-Desktop > clients and tools -> Typesafe-MCP, JEV-MCP, Semdecide > UI -> JSON-Render > trading -> JEV-Trader, Prism > data -> Neo4Jev, JEV-Curate > founders -> KillMyIdea > just for fun -> Typesafe-Mario, OneVOneJev, JEV-Drone grab the one closest to your job and ship something on top of it this week

Mr. Buzzoni

29,333 просмотров • 13 дней назад

this is unreal f*cking gold for Jev builders 20 repos people are building on Jev right now. browser agents, context tools, trading bots, even a drone 1. JEV-Ultrafast - a browser agent built for speed ↳ 2. Fast-JEV-Compaction - squeezes your context down ↳ 3. JSON-Render - UI generated on the fly ↳ 4. Typesafe-MCP - plugs Jev into any client ↳ 5. JEV-MCP - a toolkit for judgment calls ↳ 6. Semdecide - a classifier right in your terminal ↳ 7. JEV-Codex-Router - sends every task to the model that fits it ↳ 8. Winnow - clears the junk out of your context ↳ 9. JEV-Review - sorts code reviews by what needs eyes first ↳ 10. Blink - finds your way around any repo ↳ 11. Agent-Desktop - runs your desktop for you ↳ 12. Typesafe-Mario - an agent playing Super Mario ↳ 13. JEV-Drone - flies a drone ↳ 14. OneVOneJev - a shooter in your browser ↳ 15. JEV-Trader - high-frequency market making ↳ 16. Prism - spots liquidity signals ↳ 17. Neo4Jev - walks a knowledge graph ↳ 18. JEV-Curate - screens training data ↳ 19. Canny - confirms a task is really finished ↳ 20. KillMyIdea - scores a startup idea before you sink time into it ↳ start where your work is: > coding -> JEV-Review, Blink, Canny, JEV-Codex-Router > context -> Fast-JEV-Compaction, Winnow > automation -> JEV-Ultrafast, Agent-Desktop > clients and tools -> Typesafe-MCP, JEV-MCP, Semdecide > UI -> JSON-Render > trading -> JEV-Trader, Prism > data -> Neo4Jev, JEV-Curate > founders -> KillMyIdea > for fun -> Typesafe-Mario, OneVOneJev, JEV-Drone pick one, build on it this week, and you'll be the person on your team who actually knows Jev engineering when it gets asked for

this is unreal f*cking gold for Jev builders 20 repos people are building on Jev right now. browser agents, context tools, trading bots, even a drone 1. JEV-Ultrafast - a browser agent built for speed ↳ 2. Fast-JEV-Compaction - squeezes your context down ↳ 3. JSON-Render - UI generated on the fly ↳ 4. Typesafe-MCP - plugs Jev into any client ↳ 5. JEV-MCP - a toolkit for judgment calls ↳ 6. Semdecide - a classifier right in your terminal ↳ 7. JEV-Codex-Router - sends every task to the model that fits it ↳ 8. Winnow - clears the junk out of your context ↳ 9. JEV-Review - sorts code reviews by what needs eyes first ↳ 10. Blink - finds your way around any repo ↳ 11. Agent-Desktop - runs your desktop for you ↳ 12. Typesafe-Mario - an agent playing Super Mario ↳ 13. JEV-Drone - flies a drone ↳ 14. OneVOneJev - a shooter in your browser ↳ 15. JEV-Trader - high-frequency market making ↳ 16. Prism - spots liquidity signals ↳ 17. Neo4Jev - walks a knowledge graph ↳ 18. JEV-Curate - screens training data ↳ 19. Canny - confirms a task is really finished ↳ 20. KillMyIdea - scores a startup idea before you sink time into it ↳ start where your work is: > coding -> JEV-Review, Blink, Canny, JEV-Codex-Router > context -> Fast-JEV-Compaction, Winnow > automation -> JEV-Ultrafast, Agent-Desktop > clients and tools -> Typesafe-MCP, JEV-MCP, Semdecide > UI -> JSON-Render > trading -> JEV-Trader, Prism > data -> Neo4Jev, JEV-Curate > founders -> KillMyIdea > for fun -> Typesafe-Mario, OneVOneJev, JEV-Drone pick one, build on it this week, and you'll be the person on your team who actually knows Jev engineering when it gets asked for

Mr. Buzzoni

11,667 просмотров • 8 дней назад

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.2M FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD THE JEV SYSTEM IN 60 MINUTES, DOING $100K A MONTH four agents cost $0, and the system they assemble in an hour generates $100K a month scout → builder → critic → operator → JEV every agent is pinned to one exact model version, and none of them runs on "latest" the scout on Haiku 4.5 reads the market, the builder on Sonnet 5 builds everything, the critic on Opus 5 decides what ships the operator runs Haiku through the batch API at half price - the one agent that never has to hurry the builder takes 59% of the whole hour, because it's the one writing, and writing costs 5x more than reading short answers are cheap answers - and the whole economics rests on that one rule pin the versions in ROOT.md and next month JEV behaves exactly the same point it at "latest" and the model underneath updates quietly, no error, and the answers start to drift $100K a month is 334 customers at $299 four versions, one system - pin them and JEV stays JEV save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 4 agents ↓

ANTHROPIC LEAKED A $4.2M FILE WHERE 4 AGENTS BUILD THE JEV SYSTEM IN 60 MINUTES, DOING $100K A MONTH four agents cost $0, and the system they assemble in an hour generates $100K a month scout → builder → critic → operator → JEV every agent is pinned to one exact model version, and none of them runs on "latest" the scout on Haiku 4.5 reads the market, the builder on Sonnet 5 builds everything, the critic on Opus 5 decides what ships the operator runs Haiku through the batch API at half price - the one agent that never has to hurry the builder takes 59% of the whole hour, because it's the one writing, and writing costs 5x more than reading short answers are cheap answers - and the whole economics rests on that one rule pin the versions in ROOT.md and next month JEV behaves exactly the same point it at "latest" and the model underneath updates quietly, no error, and the answers start to drift $100K a month is 334 customers at $299 four versions, one system - pin them and JEV stays JEV save this and paste it into Claude Code - let it build you these 4 agents ↓

Sprytix

37,977 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Another insane Jev use case! Jev makes it incredibly cheap to evaluate and classify agent runs at scale. And finally, someone open-sourced a self-improving memory layer that can put that capability to work across agent harnesses. It turns your agent sessions into a compounding knowledge layer, where every successful run can make future agents smarter across: - Codex - Claude Code - Cursor - OpenCode and 20+ more Beacon by Asymptote Labs continuously builds a shared history across your agent harnesses and uses Jev to identify the runs worth learning from. It then turns the best workflows, corrections, and debugging patterns into reusable skills. GitHub repo: (don’t forget to star it ⭐) Most agent runs are messy. They contain exploration, failed commands, dead ends, and one-off fixes that should never become permanent memory. So Beacon preserves the full session history, while Jev helps decide what should be promoted, reviewed, or discarded. The recording below shows this in action. Beacon found 579 sessions across 5 coding-agent harnesses and normalized them into one consistent history. From there, Jev surfaces the lessons worth keeping and makes them available across your agent stack. - A pattern learned in Cursor can carry into OpenCode. - A lesson from Claude Code can improve the next Codex run. Every successful run adds to the shared knowledge layer, making future agents smarter. If you want to dive deeper into Jev, I also wrote a breakdown of how it works. The article is quoted below.

Another insane Jev use case! Jev makes it incredibly cheap to evaluate and classify agent runs at scale. And finally, someone open-sourced a self-improving memory layer that can put that capability to work across agent harnesses. It turns your agent sessions into a compounding knowledge layer, where every successful run can make future agents smarter across: - Codex - Claude Code - Cursor - OpenCode and 20+ more Beacon by Asymptote Labs continuously builds a shared history across your agent harnesses and uses Jev to identify the runs worth learning from. It then turns the best workflows, corrections, and debugging patterns into reusable skills. GitHub repo: (don’t forget to star it ⭐) Most agent runs are messy. They contain exploration, failed commands, dead ends, and one-off fixes that should never become permanent memory. So Beacon preserves the full session history, while Jev helps decide what should be promoted, reviewed, or discarded. The recording below shows this in action. Beacon found 579 sessions across 5 coding-agent harnesses and normalized them into one consistent history. From there, Jev surfaces the lessons worth keeping and makes them available across your agent stack. - A pattern learned in Cursor can carry into OpenCode. - A lesson from Claude Code can improve the next Codex run. Every successful run adds to the shared knowledge layer, making future agents smarter. If you want to dive deeper into Jev, I also wrote a breakdown of how it works. The article is quoted below.

Akshay 🚀

119,449 просмотров • 15 дней назад

Most AI coding setups right now look something like this: one agent in a terminal, another in a browser tab, a chat window somewhere else, and you in the middle copy-pasting diffs like a very tired air traffic controller. JetBrains just launched something aimed right at that mess. It's called JetBrains Air, and it lives inside their IDEs. The short version: Air lets you direct multiple coding agents, run their tasks in parallel, and review their work without ever leaving your IDE. Here's what stood out to me: 👇 1. You pick the agents. Air isn't tied to a single agent or provider. You can use the ones you already like. That matters more than it sounds, because the "best" coding agent changes every few months, and nobody wants to rebuild their whole workflow each time. 2. Parallel work without losing track. You can run several agent sessions at once, even across different projects. Air shows you where your attention is needed, so you're not hopping between tabs to find out which agent is stuck. 3. You stay in control. You can follow what each agent is doing, give it input, inspect the changes, and review the output before accepting anything. Nothing lands in your codebase just because an agent felt confident. 4. The agents get IDE smarts too. This is the part I find most interesting. JetBrains IDEs already have great code navigation, refactoring, testing, and debugging. With Air, both you and your agents work with that context. So the agents aren't guessing blind inside a chat box, and when something needs a human, the real tools are right there. The bigger idea here is that agents become part of your development workflow instead of a separate chat you keep switching to. There's also a nice bonus. For a limited time, JetBrains is offering Junie Lite for free (fair use applies). It's their own coding agent paired with a highly efficient model. It isn't pitched as a frontier-level agent. Think of it as a solid, free baseline for trying out Air and running everyday tasks. Air works in any JetBrains IDE and is in early access right now. If you write code with agents, give it a try: #ad

Most AI coding setups right now look something like this: one agent in a terminal, another in a browser tab, a chat window somewhere else, and you in the middle copy-pasting diffs like a very tired air traffic controller. JetBrains just launched something aimed right at that mess. It's called JetBrains Air, and it lives inside their IDEs. The short version: Air lets you direct multiple coding agents, run their tasks in parallel, and review their work without ever leaving your IDE. Here's what stood out to me: 👇 1. You pick the agents. Air isn't tied to a single agent or provider. You can use the ones you already like. That matters more than it sounds, because the "best" coding agent changes every few months, and nobody wants to rebuild their whole workflow each time. 2. Parallel work without losing track. You can run several agent sessions at once, even across different projects. Air shows you where your attention is needed, so you're not hopping between tabs to find out which agent is stuck. 3. You stay in control. You can follow what each agent is doing, give it input, inspect the changes, and review the output before accepting anything. Nothing lands in your codebase just because an agent felt confident. 4. The agents get IDE smarts too. This is the part I find most interesting. JetBrains IDEs already have great code navigation, refactoring, testing, and debugging. With Air, both you and your agents work with that context. So the agents aren't guessing blind inside a chat box, and when something needs a human, the real tools are right there. The bigger idea here is that agents become part of your development workflow instead of a separate chat you keep switching to. There's also a nice bonus. For a limited time, JetBrains is offering Junie Lite for free (fair use applies). It's their own coding agent paired with a highly efficient model. It isn't pitched as a frontier-level agent. Think of it as a solid, free baseline for trying out Air and running everyday tasks. Air works in any JetBrains IDE and is in early access right now. If you write code with agents, give it a try: #ad

Mushfiq Sajib

40,469 просмотров • 2 дней назад

this is pure f*cking gold for anyone doing Jev engineering the skill that teaches Claude Code to build on Jev the right way, from TypeSafe themselves without it, coding agents send Jev one question at a time and guess the field names with it, the order is set before a single line gets written: docs -> behaviour -> judgments -> one request -> code decides the two-page breakdown of every rule: > the failure each of its 11 instructions is there to prevent > Choice, Noul or Score, picked at a glance > a prompt skeleton you paste straight into your agent 12.2x that's how far the bill fell in TypeSafe's cookbook when 13 questions went out in one call one short file, and your agent stops paying for decisions it should have batched

this is pure f*cking gold for anyone doing Jev engineering the skill that teaches Claude Code to build on Jev the right way, from TypeSafe themselves without it, coding agents send Jev one question at a time and guess the field names with it, the order is set before a single line gets written: docs -> behaviour -> judgments -> one request -> code decides the two-page breakdown of every rule: > the failure each of its 11 instructions is there to prevent > Choice, Noul or Score, picked at a glance > a prompt skeleton you paste straight into your agent 12.2x that's how far the bill fell in TypeSafe's cookbook when 13 questions went out in one call one short file, and your agent stops paying for decisions it should have batched

Mr. Buzzoni

28,212 просмотров • 9 дней назад

If you use Cursor for coding, Claude Code for debugging, and local agents for automation, you almost certainly have a context problem. Every tool acts like an isolated employee. One assistant forgets what the other just learned. The biggest bottleneck in multi-agent workflows right now isn’t reasoning. It’s collective amnesia, combined with zero communication between agents. Memmy just launched a smart fix for this: a local, cross-agent memory layer. Instead of re-pasting your context everywhere, Memmy gives your stack a shared memory hub: → accumulate knowledge once, then use it across Cursor, Codex, and OpenClaw → automatically scan and import your existing agent history, so you don’t have to start from zero → keep your memory local, while model usage depends on your chosen provider or BYOK setup And it isn’t just a memory plugin. It’s a complete personal AI runtime with both MCP and a CLI. Memmy officially launched on Product Hunt, and the team is giving early users experiencing context fragmentation a free trial with 2M GPT tokens. Check it out and support the team with an upvote: → Best part? It’s also open-source for devs who want to build their own agents 🔥 Repo in 🧵↓

If you use Cursor for coding, Claude Code for debugging, and local agents for automation, you almost certainly have a context problem. Every tool acts like an isolated employee. One assistant forgets what the other just learned. The biggest bottleneck in multi-agent workflows right now isn’t reasoning. It’s collective amnesia, combined with zero communication between agents. Memmy just launched a smart fix for this: a local, cross-agent memory layer. Instead of re-pasting your context everywhere, Memmy gives your stack a shared memory hub: → accumulate knowledge once, then use it across Cursor, Codex, and OpenClaw → automatically scan and import your existing agent history, so you don’t have to start from zero → keep your memory local, while model usage depends on your chosen provider or BYOK setup And it isn’t just a memory plugin. It’s a complete personal AI runtime with both MCP and a CLI. Memmy officially launched on Product Hunt, and the team is giving early users experiencing context fragmentation a free trial with 2M GPT tokens. Check it out and support the team with an upvote: → Best part? It’s also open-source for devs who want to build their own agents 🔥 Repo in 🧵↓

Charly Wargnier

203,456 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Kimi CEO Zhilin Yang: "The biggest mistake in agent systems - people trying to build one smarter agent we didn't make one smarter - Kimi made a thousand: one brain, a thousand hands" here's how: step 1 → stop polishing one agent, split the task and run many in parallel - that's the real ceiling-break step 2 → give each agent a long context so it can run for days, not seconds - long context is what lets an agent run long step 3 → give each agent a strong prior, so agent-RL can search for a good solution instead of starting from zero step 4 → don't just add more data - make each token count. they hit the data wall, so they made every token 2x smarter step 5 → don't scale one brain, scale the swarm - many agents working in parallel beat one agent thinking harder he just dropped Kimi K3 - and this 40-min workflow is the best on how to actually use it watch & bookmark - then read the article on saving on agents ↓

Kimi CEO Zhilin Yang: "The biggest mistake in agent systems - people trying to build one smarter agent we didn't make one smarter - Kimi made a thousand: one brain, a thousand hands" here's how: step 1 → stop polishing one agent, split the task and run many in parallel - that's the real ceiling-break step 2 → give each agent a long context so it can run for days, not seconds - long context is what lets an agent run long step 3 → give each agent a strong prior, so agent-RL can search for a good solution instead of starting from zero step 4 → don't just add more data - make each token count. they hit the data wall, so they made every token 2x smarter step 5 → don't scale one brain, scale the swarm - many agents working in parallel beat one agent thinking harder he just dropped Kimi K3 - and this 40-min workflow is the best on how to actually use it watch & bookmark - then read the article on saving on agents ↓

codila

61,294 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

this is pure f*cking gold TypeSafe released the skill that teaches Claude Code to build on Jev left alone, coding agents send Jev one question per call and guess the field names this skill fixes the order before a single line gets written: docs -> behaviour -> judgments -> one request -> code decides every rule in it, broken down on two pages: > the failure behind each of its 11 instructions > Choice, Noul or Score, picked in one glance > a prompt skeleton you paste straight into your agent 12.2x that's how far the bill drops when 13 questions share one call, measured in TypeSafe's cookbook one short file, and your agent stops paying for decisions it should batch

this is pure f*cking gold TypeSafe released the skill that teaches Claude Code to build on Jev left alone, coding agents send Jev one question per call and guess the field names this skill fixes the order before a single line gets written: docs -> behaviour -> judgments -> one request -> code decides every rule in it, broken down on two pages: > the failure behind each of its 11 instructions > Choice, Noul or Score, picked in one glance > a prompt skeleton you paste straight into your agent 12.2x that's how far the bill drops when 13 questions share one call, measured in TypeSafe's cookbook one short file, and your agent stops paying for decisions it should batch

Annatar.md

10,107 просмотров • 11 дней назад