Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez on AI: The paradox is that we have these techno oligarchs investing in a technology that many of their workers say could kill and end humanity. And at the same time, these technical oligarchs are investing massively in immortality. I think that what we need... show more

Clash Report

895,417 subscribers

23,039 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik Gesundheit & Wellness Wissenschaft & Technologie

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

3 Kommentare

Profilbild von ShadowAguy

ShadowAguyvor 13 Tagen

The immortality angle is the real tell. They are building the very thing that threatens their biological substrate. It is not a paradox, it is a panic response by people who think they can outbid death.

Profilbild von Tom L.

Tom L.vor 13 Tagen

Fear mongering

Profilbild von Andy froemel

Andy froemelvor 13 Tagen

These oligarchs are all investing in bunkers because they know something bad is coming. They are afraid of the economic collapse the Iran War could cause yet they aren’t speaking out against it, and in some cases openly supporting it.

Ähnliche Videos

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez: We must impose strict regulations on the tech oligarchs who control the functioning of social networks and the development of artificial intelligence, because at the end of the day, the future of our children is more important than the pockets of these tech oligarchs.

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez: We must impose strict regulations on the tech oligarchs who control the functioning of social networks and the development of artificial intelligence, because at the end of the day, the future of our children is more important than the pockets of these tech oligarchs.

Clash Report

27,231 Aufrufe • vor 13 Tagen

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez: Do we want a technology that normalizes and amplifies deception, that turns privacy into a commodity, a society in which a techno-oligarch can intrude, as they did yesterday, into the mobile phones of millions of citizens to tell them lies? I believe the answer must be a clear no, and they will not break us, because the voice of reason, of the social majority, and of democracy will not be bent by those algorithmic techno-oligarchs.

Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez: Do we want a technology that normalizes and amplifies deception, that turns privacy into a commodity, a society in which a techno-oligarch can intrude, as they did yesterday, into the mobile phones of millions of citizens to tell them lies? I believe the answer must be a clear no, and they will not break us, because the voice of reason, of the social majority, and of democracy will not be bent by those algorithmic techno-oligarchs.

Clash Report

67,248 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

🇪🇸Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez: Do we want technology that normalizes and amplifies deception? That turns privacy into a commodity? A society where a techno-oligarch can infiltrate, as they did yesterday, into the mobile phones of millions of citizens to feed them lies? I believe the answer must be a clear no, and they will not break us, because the voice of reason, of the social majority, and of democracy will not be bent by those algorithmic techno-oligarchs.

🇪🇸Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez: Do we want technology that normalizes and amplifies deception? That turns privacy into a commodity? A society where a techno-oligarch can infiltrate, as they did yesterday, into the mobile phones of millions of citizens to feed them lies? I believe the answer must be a clear no, and they will not break us, because the voice of reason, of the social majority, and of democracy will not be bent by those algorithmic techno-oligarchs.

Visioner

17,188 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

What the AI oligarchs want to do is replace human workers. Well, some of us are old-fashioned, and we believe in human beings.

What the AI oligarchs want to do is replace human workers. Well, some of us are old-fashioned, and we believe in human beings.

Sen. Bernie Sanders

136,466 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

In just a few months, we've closed the gap from 21 points to 5 points in the polls. We can end political corruption. We can control AI so it works for humanity, not the oligarchs. We can have Medicare-for-all and lower the cost of living. But to do any of that, we have to change the leadership and direction of the Democratic Party, and our campaign is the only one willing to speak that truth. San Franciscans agree, and that's why we're surging. Sign up to volunteer at This is our chance.

In just a few months, we've closed the gap from 21 points to 5 points in the polls. We can end political corruption. We can control AI so it works for humanity, not the oligarchs. We can have Medicare-for-all and lower the cost of living. But to do any of that, we have to change the leadership and direction of the Democratic Party, and our campaign is the only one willing to speak that truth. San Franciscans agree, and that's why we're surging. Sign up to volunteer at This is our chance.

Saikat Chakrabarti

45,905 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

PANAMA: Based on this and that: I suspect part of what is happening in Panama is Trump is playing hardball to take the Chinese ports — and some other infrastructure — to put into hands of Blackrock and others. CCP must be rooted out of here. But these are battling Oligarchs — and +99% of us are not in either or any of their clubs. Chinese Communist Party is ultra-racist and authoritarian and wants to genocide us. Other oligarchs forced or tricked billions of jabs into people. If someone attempted to coerce or trick you into the jab, there is no place for you on their dark ark. They already tried to kill you. And many are not reading this because they are dead. This is a battle between Oligarchs.

PANAMA: Based on this and that: I suspect part of what is happening in Panama is Trump is playing hardball to take the Chinese ports — and some other infrastructure — to put into hands of Blackrock and others. CCP must be rooted out of here. But these are battling Oligarchs — and +99% of us are not in either or any of their clubs. Chinese Communist Party is ultra-racist and authoritarian and wants to genocide us. Other oligarchs forced or tricked billions of jabs into people. If someone attempted to coerce or trick you into the jab, there is no place for you on their dark ark. They already tried to kill you. And many are not reading this because they are dead. This is a battle between Oligarchs.

Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

61,073 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world. And they're moving very, very fast. They're almost at where we are or maybe going to beat us. And they have a ton of regulation.” “So the tech bros in the U.S. that say if we regulate AI, the Chinese going to win - that’s a self-serving argument. That isn't true. But at the same time, we have to understand that Chinese regulation of AI is meant to protect the Chinese Communist Party. When we talk about regulation of AI, we're talking about protecting our privacy, our citizens, our data, our democracy. They don't care about that in China. They don't have that.”

“This idea that if we regulate AI, that China will win, is not true. And the way that we know that is because China regulates AI. They have the most regulation of their AI than any country in the world. And they're moving very, very fast. They're almost at where we are or maybe going to beat us. And they have a ton of regulation.” “So the tech bros in the U.S. that say if we regulate AI, the Chinese going to win - that’s a self-serving argument. That isn't true. But at the same time, we have to understand that Chinese regulation of AI is meant to protect the Chinese Communist Party. When we talk about regulation of AI, we're talking about protecting our privacy, our citizens, our data, our democracy. They don't care about that in China. They don't have that.”

Josh Rogin

55,198 Aufrufe • vor 18 Tagen

Sanders: I will tell you what I think the worst addiction in this country is, the most dangerous, and that is the greed of the oligarchs. Everybody wants to do well. These guys already have billions, tens of billions, hundreds of billions. How much money do you need?

Sanders: I will tell you what I think the worst addiction in this country is, the most dangerous, and that is the greed of the oligarchs. Everybody wants to do well. These guys already have billions, tens of billions, hundreds of billions. How much money do you need?

Acyn

145,920 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that I would submit: techno-realist." "Which is, technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop." "AI is going to happen. We might as well be the leader." "If we don't do it, somebody else will. China's going to do it or somebody else will do it." "If we don't, we could lose in a key category that has implications for national security, for our economy, for many things." "That's just not a world we want to live in." "So, I think a lot of this debate is sort of academic because the question is just, is it going to happen or not?" "And I think the answer is yes. So then we want to control it." "There's not a tremendous amount of choice in this, I think."

David Sacks: The Techno-Realist On E215, David Sacks explained a third category outside of techno-optimist and doomer: "Given the choice between the two categories of techno-optimist and techno-pessimist, I'm definitely in the optimist camp. And I think we should be." "But I think there's actually a third category that I would submit: techno-realist." "Which is, technology is going to happen. Trying to stop it is like ordering the tides to stop." "AI is going to happen. We might as well be the leader." "If we don't do it, somebody else will. China's going to do it or somebody else will do it." "If we don't, we could lose in a key category that has implications for national security, for our economy, for many things." "That's just not a world we want to live in." "So, I think a lot of this debate is sort of academic because the question is just, is it going to happen or not?" "And I think the answer is yes. So then we want to control it." "There's not a tremendous amount of choice in this, I think."

The All-In Podcast

154,348 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

PabloReports: AI companies seem to be saying that they want to slow it down, but there’s a lot of skepticism about whether or not they’re genuine or serious about their intentions. What do you make of it? AOC: I think two things can be true at once. One is understanding that AI technology can be very dangerous when pursued without any guardrails. And we can also acknowledge the financially upside-down position that a lot of these oligarchs are in. There is an AI bubble honestly, over the last year. The entire U.S. economy and our positive performance can largely be attributed to seven AI companies that many believe [their] stock prices are a bubble. It’s been several months now that I have been sounding the alarm that AI, that the AI industry should not receive a government bailout. And I am very concerned that in this landscape of a potentially dangerous technology emerging, we also have companies that are in a financially upside-down position, where everyday people’s 401(k)s and pensions are invested and have open exposure to potentially volatile investments. And we could be seeing an economic bubble collide with a technological frontier. And so, my primary concern in all of this is working-class people—their jobs, their retirements, their pensions—and protecting them from the gambling that San Francisco has been doing in people’s livelihoods.

PabloReports: AI companies seem to be saying that they want to slow it down, but there’s a lot of skepticism about whether or not they’re genuine or serious about their intentions. What do you make of it? AOC: I think two things can be true at once. One is understanding that AI technology can be very dangerous when pursued without any guardrails. And we can also acknowledge the financially upside-down position that a lot of these oligarchs are in. There is an AI bubble honestly, over the last year. The entire U.S. economy and our positive performance can largely be attributed to seven AI companies that many believe [their] stock prices are a bubble. It’s been several months now that I have been sounding the alarm that AI, that the AI industry should not receive a government bailout. And I am very concerned that in this landscape of a potentially dangerous technology emerging, we also have companies that are in a financially upside-down position, where everyday people’s 401(k)s and pensions are invested and have open exposure to potentially volatile investments. And we could be seeing an economic bubble collide with a technological frontier. And so, my primary concern in all of this is working-class people—their jobs, their retirements, their pensions—and protecting them from the gambling that San Francisco has been doing in people’s livelihoods.

Acyn

171,301 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Punjab also, Excellency, now happens to be the most AI-enabled province. We are investing hugely in AI. Punjab is the only province to have a dedicated AI office. It is called the Office of the AI. And we are trying to implement all that we can, make use of the technology not only in governance, but in everything that we come across, be it health, be it education, be it livestock, be it agriculture. Only this morning I had a meeting with Huawei, and I had meetings with Alibaba. And I am very eager to learn from their AI medical interventions. We have also started that in Pakistan. #MaryamNawazInChina

Punjab also, Excellency, now happens to be the most AI-enabled province. We are investing hugely in AI. Punjab is the only province to have a dedicated AI office. It is called the Office of the AI. And we are trying to implement all that we can, make use of the technology not only in governance, but in everything that we come across, be it health, be it education, be it livestock, be it agriculture. Only this morning I had a meeting with Huawei, and I had meetings with Alibaba. And I am very eager to learn from their AI medical interventions. We have also started that in Pakistan. #MaryamNawazInChina

PMLN

175,630 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

PabloReports: Are AI companies too big to fail at this point? AOC: No. I don’t think AI companies are too big to fail. No company should be too big to fail in America, because if all these folks who pride themselves in being capitalists should know it is that government should not be bailing out these corporations. What we should be doing is protecting everyday people from the recklessness and the dangerous decisions that these oligarchs are making. If you have someone that is worth hundreds of billions of dollars, they can take the hit. But people’s pensions and people’s retirements should not be on the line because of the gambling of a handful of people in either San Francisco or Wall Street.

PabloReports: Are AI companies too big to fail at this point? AOC: No. I don’t think AI companies are too big to fail. No company should be too big to fail in America, because if all these folks who pride themselves in being capitalists should know it is that government should not be bailing out these corporations. What we should be doing is protecting everyday people from the recklessness and the dangerous decisions that these oligarchs are making. If you have someone that is worth hundreds of billions of dollars, they can take the hit. But people’s pensions and people’s retirements should not be on the line because of the gambling of a handful of people in either San Francisco or Wall Street.

Acyn

192,506 Aufrufe • vor 22 Tagen

Whitney Webb just said the quiet part out loud. Big Tech has “fused with the national security state.” And their goal isn’t just mass surveillance using Flock cameras and data centers. It’s even darker than that. “They are openly transhumanist.” The real “end goal” of Big Tech oligarchs is to literally “have humanity merge with AI.” “Some of them hold an almost religious fervor … for having that come to fruition.” And they now have “more influence than arguably any other group right now.” They’re inextricably intertwined with the deep state. “You can see how these two groups have become so intertwined by the fact that the intelligence community, as well as the military … contract extensively with these same Big Tech companies and are arguably largely dependent on them.” “At the same time, a lot of these Big Tech oligarchs are major donors to our politicians.” “These people are looking to build data centers all over the world.” “Why data centers?” “It’s essential to their various plans.” “Not just their plans for AI-related businesses.” “But also a lot of these people subscribe to specific ideologies that see that extreme investments in AI … are necessary in order to further the development of what they call artificial general intelligence, or an AI super intelligence.” Whitney Webb Chris Hedges

Whitney Webb just said the quiet part out loud. Big Tech has “fused with the national security state.” And their goal isn’t just mass surveillance using Flock cameras and data centers. It’s even darker than that. “They are openly transhumanist.” The real “end goal” of Big Tech oligarchs is to literally “have humanity merge with AI.” “Some of them hold an almost religious fervor … for having that come to fruition.” And they now have “more influence than arguably any other group right now.” They’re inextricably intertwined with the deep state. “You can see how these two groups have become so intertwined by the fact that the intelligence community, as well as the military … contract extensively with these same Big Tech companies and are arguably largely dependent on them.” “At the same time, a lot of these Big Tech oligarchs are major donors to our politicians.” “These people are looking to build data centers all over the world.” “Why data centers?” “It’s essential to their various plans.” “Not just their plans for AI-related businesses.” “But also a lot of these people subscribe to specific ideologies that see that extreme investments in AI … are necessary in order to further the development of what they call artificial general intelligence, or an AI super intelligence.” Whitney Webb Chris Hedges

Holden Culotta

144,399 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Sanders: It's not just the race between Abdul and Congresswoman Stevens, what it's about is that the billionaire class and their super pacs who are now spending over $60 million to defeat El-Sayed. What are they afraid of? And the answer is that if Abdul wins, the word goes out all over the country that we can take on the oligarchs, we can take on the super pacs, and in fact, we can create a government that works for all

Sanders: It's not just the race between Abdul and Congresswoman Stevens, what it's about is that the billionaire class and their super pacs who are now spending over $60 million to defeat El-Sayed. What are they afraid of? And the answer is that if Abdul wins, the word goes out all over the country that we can take on the oligarchs, we can take on the super pacs, and in fact, we can create a government that works for all

Acyn

29,438 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Shuler: As a backdrop, the economy isn’t working for working people right now. We have inequality at its highest levels. People are working harder and harder for less. They’re working two and three jobs just to keep up. In the U.S., 40 percent of workers do not have $400 for an emergency. Now put AI on top of that—the insecurity that we are all experiencing, the fact that people are waking up and some new technology is landing in their jobs without training and without having a say. Of course they’re going to be anxious and feel insecure about what the future holds. And so I really think we need to stop and ask, “Who are we doing this for? What are the results we want? And how do we get there?” We get there by including workers in the process. They shouldn’t have to be at the end of the cycle. They should actually be upstream.

Shuler: As a backdrop, the economy isn’t working for working people right now. We have inequality at its highest levels. People are working harder and harder for less. They’re working two and three jobs just to keep up. In the U.S., 40 percent of workers do not have $400 for an emergency. Now put AI on top of that—the insecurity that we are all experiencing, the fact that people are waking up and some new technology is landing in their jobs without training and without having a say. Of course they’re going to be anxious and feel insecure about what the future holds. And so I really think we need to stop and ask, “Who are we doing this for? What are the results we want? And how do we get there?” We get there by including workers in the process. They shouldn’t have to be at the end of the cycle. They should actually be upstream.

Acyn

41,208 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten