Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Speaker 2: “Chelsea are having a right go again, aren’t they?” Speaker 1: “Yeah.” Speaker 2: “What’s their spending up to now since Todd Boehly came in? It must be billions.” Speaker 1: “Yeah, telephone numbers, isn’t it? Even this summer, £117 million for Morgan Rogers and £52 million...

tiier_1st's profile picture

SHAYEE 𒀭

52,111 subscribers

44,740 views • 19 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Speaker 1: Mark my words, I think Morgan Rogers will perform very well, especially playing alongside Cole Palmer, whom he has played with before. Speaker 3: Rogers? Speaker 1: Yes. Rogers and Palmer playing behind the striker could be amazing. Speaker 2: I understand that. If Chelsea play with three defenders and use Rogers and Palmer behind the striker, it could work brilliantly. Speaker 3: But Rogers could also have played on the left for Arsenal and drifted inside. Speaker 4: Arsenal already have about four attacking midfielders, so they do not really need another one. Speaker 5: Stop sounding salty. You needed him that’s why he was your top target and he rejected your small club
2:41

Speaker 1: Mark my words, I think Morgan Rogers will perform very well, especially playing alongside Cole Palmer, whom he has played with before. Speaker 3: Rogers? Speaker 1: Yes. Rogers and Palmer playing behind the striker could be amazing. Speaker 2: I understand that. If Chelsea play with three defenders and use Rogers and Palmer behind the striker, it could work brilliantly. Speaker 3: But Rogers could also have played on the left for Arsenal and drifted inside. Speaker 4: Arsenal already have about four attacking midfielders, so they do not really need another one. Speaker 5: Stop sounding salty. You needed him that’s why he was your top target and he rejected your small club

SHAYEE 𒀭

29,280 views • 22 days ago

When a motion for the removal of the Speaker is taken up, Article 96 makes it very clear that the Speaker cannot sit in the Chair. The actions of the Speaker also cannot be admitted at that point of time. You (Jagdambika Pal) have been appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. You are sitting there as a member of the panel of chairpersons appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Article 93 states: “The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof and, so often as the office of the Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the House shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.” Immediately after the election, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker are supposed to be elected. For the last seven years, you have not elected a Deputy Speaker. You have created a constitutional vacuum. This question is very clear. Article 96 is very clear. 👉The House has to select a person to sit in the Chair. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) K C Venugopal ji in Lok Sabha
1:30

When a motion for the removal of the Speaker is taken up, Article 96 makes it very clear that the Speaker cannot sit in the Chair. The actions of the Speaker also cannot be admitted at that point of time. You (Jagdambika Pal) have been appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. You are sitting there as a member of the panel of chairpersons appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. Article 93 states: “The House of the People shall, as soon as may be, choose two members of the House to be respectively Speaker and Deputy Speaker thereof and, so often as the office of the Speaker or Deputy Speaker becomes vacant, the House shall choose another member to be Speaker or Deputy Speaker, as the case may be.” Immediately after the election, the Speaker and Deputy Speaker are supposed to be elected. For the last seven years, you have not elected a Deputy Speaker. You have created a constitutional vacuum. This question is very clear. Article 96 is very clear. 👉The House has to select a person to sit in the Chair. : Congress General Secretary (Org.) K C Venugopal ji in Lok Sabha

Congress

112,713 views • 5 months ago

Speaker 1: "From what we understand, Arsenal's next priority is Bruno Guimarães. If they really wanted Morgan Rogers, why didn't they just pay it? £85 million for a player coming into 29 is, in terms of value, arguably more than paying £117 million for a 23-year-old. I can only imagine, Lee, that Arsenal looked at the price of Rogers and thought either he's way too expensive and they can get better elsewhere with that money, or they didn't really want him and weren't actually seriously looking at him. One of those two things has to be true." Lee Gunner: "Because Rodgers, let's be real. Harry Symeou was on talkSPORT todaybig up Tim and he said there were only two options: I stay at Aston Villa or I go to Chelsea. Because Arsenal didn't come in." Speaker 1: "So he didn't choose Chelsea over Arsenal?" Lee Gunner: "Exactly that. He never had that choice. People are saying Arsenal was an option, but it wasn't. With all these player contracts and everything else, if a club comes in and agrees to pay the asking price, that's what matters. You can't just turn around and say, 'I don't want to go there, I want to go somewhere else,' if that other club hasn't actually come in for you."
6:28

Speaker 1: "From what we understand, Arsenal's next priority is Bruno Guimarães. If they really wanted Morgan Rogers, why didn't they just pay it? £85 million for a player coming into 29 is, in terms of value, arguably more than paying £117 million for a 23-year-old. I can only imagine, Lee, that Arsenal looked at the price of Rogers and thought either he's way too expensive and they can get better elsewhere with that money, or they didn't really want him and weren't actually seriously looking at him. One of those two things has to be true." Lee Gunner: "Because Rodgers, let's be real. Harry Symeou was on talkSPORT todaybig up Tim and he said there were only two options: I stay at Aston Villa or I go to Chelsea. Because Arsenal didn't come in." Speaker 1: "So he didn't choose Chelsea over Arsenal?" Lee Gunner: "Exactly that. He never had that choice. People are saying Arsenal was an option, but it wasn't. With all these player contracts and everything else, if a club comes in and agrees to pay the asking price, that's what matters. You can't just turn around and say, 'I don't want to go there, I want to go somewhere else,' if that other club hasn't actually come in for you."

SHAYEE 𒀭

55,730 views • 20 days ago

Seven years too late, but it's great to see the issue of 'missing' Deputy Speaker in #LokSabha finally being debated in House! As MP Mohd. Jawed moved the resolution to remove Om Birla as Speaker of #LokSabha, MP Asaduddin Owaisi (Asaduddin Owaisi) raises a very fundamental point - when such a motion has been moved against the Speaker, who has the authority to preside? There is no Deputy Speaker in House & no sense of the House was taken to determine if Jagdambika Pal (who is in the Chair) can preside in terms of Article 95(2) (see video) MP Nishikant Dubey interprets Article 95(2) to say that House has determined as per rules and procedure that Jagdambika Pal. Then, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju jumps in and says that the point is unnecessary, already a ruling has been given. However, it can be argued that Article 95(2) should have no application here, because it talks about Speaker and Deputy Speaker being 'absent'. Article 95(1) is the appropriate Article to be invoked here which talks about 'vacancy' in office of Speaker and Deputy Speaker. A combined reading of both 95(1) and 95(2) - Speaker is absent but post of Deputy Speaker is vacant - so who should preside? Contd..
2:36

Seven years too late, but it's great to see the issue of 'missing' Deputy Speaker in #LokSabha finally being debated in House! As MP Mohd. Jawed moved the resolution to remove Om Birla as Speaker of #LokSabha, MP Asaduddin Owaisi (Asaduddin Owaisi) raises a very fundamental point - when such a motion has been moved against the Speaker, who has the authority to preside? There is no Deputy Speaker in House & no sense of the House was taken to determine if Jagdambika Pal (who is in the Chair) can preside in terms of Article 95(2) (see video) MP Nishikant Dubey interprets Article 95(2) to say that House has determined as per rules and procedure that Jagdambika Pal. Then, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju jumps in and says that the point is unnecessary, already a ruling has been given. However, it can be argued that Article 95(2) should have no application here, because it talks about Speaker and Deputy Speaker being 'absent'. Article 95(1) is the appropriate Article to be invoked here which talks about 'vacancy' in office of Speaker and Deputy Speaker. A combined reading of both 95(1) and 95(2) - Speaker is absent but post of Deputy Speaker is vacant - so who should preside? Contd..

Maadhyam

23,010 views • 5 months ago

CNN’s Dana Bash: “You have said, ‘there is literally nothing to negotiate. There’s nothing I can do.’ You are the Speaker of the House. There is, in fact, a lot you can do.” Speaker Mike Johnson: “Well, there’s not actually. Let me explain that. The — as you noted, they’re voting right now on the Senate floor. We’ll see how that turns out. Last night, three Democrats — two Democrats and an independent flipped and came along with the Republicans, but it looks like and what we expect is that most of the Democrats in the Senate again will reject the clean CR that we sent over. It’s clean. What that means is it’s nonpartisan. We didn’t add any Republican priorities or poison pills or gimmicks or tricks into that at all. It’s 24 pages. I mean, everybody can re it for themselves. It’s simply continues the Biden-era spending levels that Chuck Schumer and the Democrats have already supported in the past. They just did it most recently in March. And he gave long speeches about how it was so critically important that we not shut the government down.” Bash: “Yeah, no. Johnson: “So, there’s nothing for me to give. There’s nothing to negotiate. I don’t have any Republican priorities to put on the table, because we sent over a clean CR, and that’s why none of this makes sense.”
1:04

CNN’s Dana Bash: “You have said, ‘there is literally nothing to negotiate. There’s nothing I can do.’ You are the Speaker of the House. There is, in fact, a lot you can do.” Speaker Mike Johnson: “Well, there’s not actually. Let me explain that. The — as you noted, they’re voting right now on the Senate floor. We’ll see how that turns out. Last night, three Democrats — two Democrats and an independent flipped and came along with the Republicans, but it looks like and what we expect is that most of the Democrats in the Senate again will reject the clean CR that we sent over. It’s clean. What that means is it’s nonpartisan. We didn’t add any Republican priorities or poison pills or gimmicks or tricks into that at all. It’s 24 pages. I mean, everybody can re it for themselves. It’s simply continues the Biden-era spending levels that Chuck Schumer and the Democrats have already supported in the past. They just did it most recently in March. And he gave long speeches about how it was so critically important that we not shut the government down.” Bash: “Yeah, no. Johnson: “So, there’s nothing for me to give. There’s nothing to negotiate. I don’t have any Republican priorities to put on the table, because we sent over a clean CR, and that’s why none of this makes sense.”

Curtis Houck

1,271,201 views • 10 months ago

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:
1:18

Inspired talking about Skewmond and" the best jungler in the west" debate Q: Everyone was talking a lot of Skewmond, and I would like to know about: do you believe like the series put an end to any debate about the best jungler in the West? Inspired: To me, there was never a debate. I knew that I’m always the best, but I think Skewmond is a good player. I wouldn’t say that he had any phenomenal series, though, this tournament. I think he, against T1, he still made a lot of mistakes. When he was stronger, he didn’t really try to fight enemies, and or sometimes just over committed a bit, and I think G2 won against T1 just by waiting for T1 to make mistakes. I think today, I think Skewmond played well in the team fights. I think every time he was on my screen and we’re like skirmishing and team fighting, I think he did a good job. But I think just like team wise, and like how they all played together as a team and use their jungler was wrong. And it’s hard to say, as I always said, that don’t really know who’s there like which jungler is good because you don’t really know what was his idea beyond the game plan, what his teammates wanted to do. But it just seems like they were not connected well enough, and on top of that, as I said, I think the drafts were not that great. So yeah, I think he’s a good player, but I think they need to work more on team synergy in order to actually pressure when they’re strong if they want to be like the best in the world, because I think they definitely can, but need to work a bit more. Source:

Yujin Ha

110,966 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: Former President Trump speaks out on the ousting of Speaker Kevin McCarthy and if he will try and be Speaker. "A lot of people have been asking me about it," Trump said. He continued, saying that there are a lot of "great people in the Republican Party who could handle the job. If I can help them do it in the process [of running for president] then I'll do it. The GOP appears to be dividing at the seam. Trump would be the worst possible choice for Speaker as it would redirect his attention away from his 5 possible trials as well as his run for President. Would you want Trump as Speaker?
0:34

BREAKING: Former President Trump speaks out on the ousting of Speaker Kevin McCarthy and if he will try and be Speaker. "A lot of people have been asking me about it," Trump said. He continued, saying that there are a lot of "great people in the Republican Party who could handle the job. If I can help them do it in the process [of running for president] then I'll do it. The GOP appears to be dividing at the seam. Trump would be the worst possible choice for Speaker as it would redirect his attention away from his 5 possible trials as well as his run for President. Would you want Trump as Speaker?

Brian Krassenstein

2,816,362 views • 2 years ago

With The January 6th Footage Being Released Today By Speaker Johnson Proving Literal Treason, Now Seems Like The Perfect Time To Reflect On This On The Record Evidence That Nancy Pelosi Spoke With The Chief of the Capitol Police SEVERAL TIMES On Jan 6th. Nancy Pelosi Was Briefed About What Was Going On 🚨 “A second set here. In a press conference on January 7th, Speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. I am calling for the resignation of the Chief of the Capitol Police, Mr. Sund, and I have received notice from Mr. Irving that he will be submitting his resignation. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol, but according to your transcribed interview... You're on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Well, let me just say this. Many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely and so with such concern for the staff, for the members, for the Capitol, for the Capitol of the United States. Many of them and they deserve our gratitude. But there was a failure of leadership at the top of the Capitol Police. And I think Mr. Sund... uh... he hasn't even called us since this happened i had made aware that i would be saying that we're calling for his resignation can you explain that discrepancy? yeah that is uh... that that is correct i spoke to speaker Pelosi three times uh... that evening and she went on national tv and said i'd never spoken to her but i spoke to her three times the three uh... three times were the first time when i went over to brief at the secure location. I had called House Sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the Vice President. I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the Capitol. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with Mr. Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 534 where I first briefed Speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location, as I was walking away I met up with Mr. Stanger and we started walking over to the Senate to go brief the Senate when Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my second call with Speaker Pelosi. Questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers, I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by 7 p.m. and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 6.25 p.m. I was over at the Senate from the secure location, I mean from where the Senate had been sequestered, and on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over or off site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have been call number three with Speaker Pelosi. So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls, so Speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. That is correct, sir. Let me just say this, many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely.” The real Insurrection at the Capitol done by the Feds and a Treasonous group of people within our own government to subvert American Tax Payers votes for the REAL elected President of the United States, Donald Trump. Release the J6 was a success. Now we need punishments. #J6Footage
2:57

With The January 6th Footage Being Released Today By Speaker Johnson Proving Literal Treason, Now Seems Like The Perfect Time To Reflect On This On The Record Evidence That Nancy Pelosi Spoke With The Chief of the Capitol Police SEVERAL TIMES On Jan 6th. Nancy Pelosi Was Briefed About What Was Going On 🚨 “A second set here. In a press conference on January 7th, Speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. I am calling for the resignation of the Chief of the Capitol Police, Mr. Sund, and I have received notice from Mr. Irving that he will be submitting his resignation. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol, but according to your transcribed interview... You're on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Well, let me just say this. Many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely and so with such concern for the staff, for the members, for the Capitol, for the Capitol of the United States. Many of them and they deserve our gratitude. But there was a failure of leadership at the top of the Capitol Police. And I think Mr. Sund... uh... he hasn't even called us since this happened i had made aware that i would be saying that we're calling for his resignation can you explain that discrepancy? yeah that is uh... that that is correct i spoke to speaker Pelosi three times uh... that evening and she went on national tv and said i'd never spoken to her but i spoke to her three times the three uh... three times were the first time when i went over to brief at the secure location. I had called House Sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the Vice President. I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the Capitol. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with Mr. Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 534 where I first briefed Speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location, as I was walking away I met up with Mr. Stanger and we started walking over to the Senate to go brief the Senate when Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my second call with Speaker Pelosi. Questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers, I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by 7 p.m. and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 6.25 p.m. I was over at the Senate from the secure location, I mean from where the Senate had been sequestered, and on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over or off site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have been call number three with Speaker Pelosi. So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls, so Speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. That is correct, sir. Let me just say this, many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely.” The real Insurrection at the Capitol done by the Feds and a Treasonous group of people within our own government to subvert American Tax Payers votes for the REAL elected President of the United States, Donald Trump. Release the J6 was a success. Now we need punishments. #J6Footage

Wall Street Apes

855,914 views • 2 years ago

General Michael Flynn says he’s knows why we’re not getting accountability for the Minnesota daycare fraud He’s looked into Speaker Mike Johnson and he’s getting daycare and healthcare clinic money funneled through PACs Taxpayers are being robbed blind “I want Speaker Johnson to do more. So we started looking at Speaker Johnson's PACs and how many of his PACs turn money back around to daycare and healthcare clinics and that kind of stuff. It's incredible the amounts of money and that's one person, but he happens to be the Speaker of the House. So this is not a partisan thing for me.” There are all in on it.
0:29

General Michael Flynn says he’s knows why we’re not getting accountability for the Minnesota daycare fraud He’s looked into Speaker Mike Johnson and he’s getting daycare and healthcare clinic money funneled through PACs Taxpayers are being robbed blind “I want Speaker Johnson to do more. So we started looking at Speaker Johnson's PACs and how many of his PACs turn money back around to daycare and healthcare clinics and that kind of stuff. It's incredible the amounts of money and that's one person, but he happens to be the Speaker of the House. So this is not a partisan thing for me.” There are all in on it.

Wall Street Apes

1,204,692 views • 7 months ago

“As a House member, before I could move a motion in the house, I had to write to the Speaker of the national assembly” “Even if you want to move such emotion, and the speaker figure out that there is an intent for such, and may want to go against what they stand for, he will sideline you” “You cannot stand up in the house and speak until the speaker permits you to do so. That is the law. The blacklist you. If you put your hands up in front of the speaker. He will overlook you and call somebody behind you.” — Hon. Chinedu Obika, Member representing Abuja Municipal/Bwari constituency. 📹: KAA Truth
2:05

“As a House member, before I could move a motion in the house, I had to write to the Speaker of the national assembly” “Even if you want to move such emotion, and the speaker figure out that there is an intent for such, and may want to go against what they stand for, he will sideline you” “You cannot stand up in the house and speak until the speaker permits you to do so. That is the law. The blacklist you. If you put your hands up in front of the speaker. He will overlook you and call somebody behind you.” — Hon. Chinedu Obika, Member representing Abuja Municipal/Bwari constituency. 📹: KAA Truth

Chude

103,809 views • 20 days ago

🇺🇸 SPEAKER JOHNSON: SEE SCHUMER'S PROPOSAL FOR YOURSELVES "The Senate Democrats, Chuck Schumer, filed a counterproposal. Now, what was in that counterproposal? You can see it for yourselves. In fact, if you're watching at home, go to my website right now: speaker .gov. Go to the Press Releases tab, and you'll see it, it's listed right there. Just click on it. I'd like you to turn in your hymnals to page 57, okay? Section 2141. It's there in black letter. They filed this. This is not a talking point. This is what they proposed." Source: Speaker Mike Johnson, Fox News
2:12

🇺🇸 SPEAKER JOHNSON: SEE SCHUMER'S PROPOSAL FOR YOURSELVES "The Senate Democrats, Chuck Schumer, filed a counterproposal. Now, what was in that counterproposal? You can see it for yourselves. In fact, if you're watching at home, go to my website right now: speaker .gov. Go to the Press Releases tab, and you'll see it, it's listed right there. Just click on it. I'd like you to turn in your hymnals to page 57, okay? Section 2141. It's there in black letter. They filed this. This is not a talking point. This is what they proposed." Source: Speaker Mike Johnson, Fox News

Mario Nawfal

45,341 views • 10 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I came to speak on the Budget, but it looks like the government and the Lok Sabha Speaker are not interested in running the House. I will come again at 2 PM and try to speak in the House. The Finance Minister was not even sitting in the House, I think they knew that the House would be adjourned..." On Opposition to move a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, he says, "It is not in my hands, you can ask the high command regarding this."
1:10

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Shashi Tharoor says, "I came to speak on the Budget, but it looks like the government and the Lok Sabha Speaker are not interested in running the House. I will come again at 2 PM and try to speak in the House. The Finance Minister was not even sitting in the House, I think they knew that the House would be adjourned..." On Opposition to move a no-confidence motion against Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, he says, "It is not in my hands, you can ask the high command regarding this."

ANI

65,967 views • 6 months ago

🇺🇸SPEAKER JOHNSON: “WE ARE NOT CUTTING MEDICAID — WE ARE ROOTING OUT ABUSE” “We are not cutting Medicaid in this package. There’s a lot of misinformation out there about this. You’re talking about 4.8 million able-bodied workers, young men, for example, who are on Medicaid and not working, they are choosing not to work when they can. When you root out those kinds of abuses, you save the resources that are so desperately needed by the people who deserve it and need it most.” Source: Rapid Response 47, Speaker Mike Johnson
0:53

🇺🇸SPEAKER JOHNSON: “WE ARE NOT CUTTING MEDICAID — WE ARE ROOTING OUT ABUSE” “We are not cutting Medicaid in this package. There’s a lot of misinformation out there about this. You’re talking about 4.8 million able-bodied workers, young men, for example, who are on Medicaid and not working, they are choosing not to work when they can. When you root out those kinds of abuses, you save the resources that are so desperately needed by the people who deserve it and need it most.” Source: Rapid Response 47, Speaker Mike Johnson

Mario Nawfal

204,103 views • 1 year ago

MOMENTS OF LIFE FREEN BECKY #ChairstoSharexFreenBecky 💁🏻‍♂️: what do you think of, becky? 🧚🏻‍♂️: i think of something bright and happy. it feels like so much joy. i don’t know…but i wonder what p’freen was thinking at that moment when the photo was captured. 🌷: i was looking at a dog i remember! 🧚🏻‍♂️: yeah, there was a dog! 🌷: a golden retriever named mango. i remember! 💁🏻‍♂️: wow, you remember that? you like to tell me i have a good memory but yours is pretty good too! 🌷: his name is mango and i think i was about to go over to him on the right side. this must be before i went to change outfits or something. 🧚🏻‍♂️: yeah yeah! 💁🏻‍♂️: it was a sunset, right? 🧚🏻‍♂️: yes! and there was the puppy! 🌷: there was a golden retriever!
0:50

MOMENTS OF LIFE FREEN BECKY #ChairstoSharexFreenBecky 💁🏻‍♂️: what do you think of, becky? 🧚🏻‍♂️: i think of something bright and happy. it feels like so much joy. i don’t know…but i wonder what p’freen was thinking at that moment when the photo was captured. 🌷: i was looking at a dog i remember! 🧚🏻‍♂️: yeah, there was a dog! 🌷: a golden retriever named mango. i remember! 💁🏻‍♂️: wow, you remember that? you like to tell me i have a good memory but yours is pretty good too! 🌷: his name is mango and i think i was about to go over to him on the right side. this must be before i went to change outfits or something. 🧚🏻‍♂️: yeah yeah! 💁🏻‍♂️: it was a sunset, right? 🧚🏻‍♂️: yes! and there was the puppy! 🌷: there was a golden retriever!

wei | cranium (2026)

34,005 views • 1 year ago

🚨Governor DeSantis CALLS OUT RINO Republican Danny Perez in front of the Florida GOP! “We called a special session.. I was NOT met with support on that by the Speaker of the House. The Speaker of the House said that it was not urgent, it was premature, that we could deal with it months down the line. THE HELL WE CAN! Biden let in 10 MILLION! But let me tell you, what he passed was one of the WORST pieces of legislation that Republicans have ever passed in the state of Florida (supported by Susie Wiles, Gruters and Perez) I was right to veto it, and you're better off as a result of having vetoed it!”
1:09

🚨Governor DeSantis CALLS OUT RINO Republican Danny Perez in front of the Florida GOP! “We called a special session.. I was NOT met with support on that by the Speaker of the House. The Speaker of the House said that it was not urgent, it was premature, that we could deal with it months down the line. THE HELL WE CAN! Biden let in 10 MILLION! But let me tell you, what he passed was one of the WORST pieces of legislation that Republicans have ever passed in the state of Florida (supported by Susie Wiles, Gruters and Perez) I was right to veto it, and you're better off as a result of having vetoed it!”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

206,590 views • 1 year ago

Kim: Yeah, just because Speaker Johnson said it doesn't make it true. We've seen Speaker Johnson over and over again just shill for this administration. He's acting more like a cabinet secretary in the Trump administration, rather than a leader of a separate branch of government. But what the American people see is right before our eyes: we have this war day, 18 billions of dollars spent. And this is not going how Trump wanted it go, because they had no strategy. They have no objective. Still, to this day, I cannot tell you exactly what they are trying to achieve and when they can say that this war is over. And that's because it is just a total debacle and it's getting worse and worse and worse at a time when the American people want us to focus in on lowering their costs—we’re now seeing those costs increase dramatically
1:00

Kim: Yeah, just because Speaker Johnson said it doesn't make it true. We've seen Speaker Johnson over and over again just shill for this administration. He's acting more like a cabinet secretary in the Trump administration, rather than a leader of a separate branch of government. But what the American people see is right before our eyes: we have this war day, 18 billions of dollars spent. And this is not going how Trump wanted it go, because they had no strategy. They have no objective. Still, to this day, I cannot tell you exactly what they are trying to achieve and when they can say that this war is over. And that's because it is just a total debacle and it's getting worse and worse and worse at a time when the American people want us to focus in on lowering their costs—we’re now seeing those costs increase dramatically

Acyn

93,481 views • 4 months ago

Grijalva: I do think that Speaker Johnson misplayed his hand. What he’s done, by obstructing my swearing-in, has really highlighted how corrupt this administration is. In a way, he’s given me an opportunity to connect with people across the country that I might not have been able to reach for a couple of years. And now here we are. There are people all over this nation who were out there with signs that said, “Swear her in.” They wouldn’t have even known about me otherwise. So thank you, Speaker Johnson, for making sure that what you did was highlight just how corrupt the system you’re protecting really is. And we’re going to fight through that. We really are.
1:19

Grijalva: I do think that Speaker Johnson misplayed his hand. What he’s done, by obstructing my swearing-in, has really highlighted how corrupt this administration is. In a way, he’s given me an opportunity to connect with people across the country that I might not have been able to reach for a couple of years. And now here we are. There are people all over this nation who were out there with signs that said, “Swear her in.” They wouldn’t have even known about me otherwise. So thank you, Speaker Johnson, for making sure that what you did was highlight just how corrupt the system you’re protecting really is. And we’re going to fight through that. We really are.

Acyn

447,152 views • 9 months ago

Asmongold on Zohran Mamdani mogging him “Who is a nepo baby to be fair..ya I think he’s very charismatic, he’s a great speaker..I don’t really agree w a lot of his values but I think that there are a lot of positives..are we really gonna act like guy got there all by himself..born on 3rd base and they made it to home run, good for him but I don’t like what he represents in American politics at all..I don’t think anybody should”
0:43

Asmongold on Zohran Mamdani mogging him “Who is a nepo baby to be fair..ya I think he’s very charismatic, he’s a great speaker..I don’t really agree w a lot of his values but I think that there are a lot of positives..are we really gonna act like guy got there all by himself..born on 3rd base and they made it to home run, good for him but I don’t like what he represents in American politics at all..I don’t think anybody should”

yeet

108,067 views • 5 months ago

Speaker 1: "Are you guys worried about Chelsea? Palmer with one game a week is a dangerous guy. He scored like 23 league goals the last time. Who are three players in the Premier League this season that you're most worried about having a bit of a remontada? Speaker 2: "I fully agree with you. And I agree with the comment as well. One game a week... Have you seen him training, by the way? Have you seen the training clips? While the World Cup was going on, he looked razor sharp. I really like Cole Palmer. I've always liked Cole Palmer. I really wish we could bring him home and bring him to United, but just watching him play football is amazing. He's a sharp, sharp footballer, and I think he'll have a really good season."
4:58

Speaker 1: "Are you guys worried about Chelsea? Palmer with one game a week is a dangerous guy. He scored like 23 league goals the last time. Who are three players in the Premier League this season that you're most worried about having a bit of a remontada? Speaker 2: "I fully agree with you. And I agree with the comment as well. One game a week... Have you seen him training, by the way? Have you seen the training clips? While the World Cup was going on, he looked razor sharp. I really like Cole Palmer. I've always liked Cole Palmer. I really wish we could bring him home and bring him to United, but just watching him play football is amazing. He's a sharp, sharp footballer, and I think he'll have a really good season."

SHAYEE 𒀭

66,694 views • 19 days ago

🦊 i spent a lot of my teenage years practicing and living as a student. looking back at that time, while there was joy in pursuing my dreams, i think there were also many exhausting moments. it’s really important to look into the heart as much as the body, but i think i didn’t realize that back then, and i feel like i’m still learning that now. i believe i can stand here now because i endured that period well and because i understand that loneliness and pain as well. i hope for the environment where children and adolescents around the world can look into their hearts and ask for help without hesitation if they need it.
0:38

🦊 i spent a lot of my teenage years practicing and living as a student. looking back at that time, while there was joy in pursuing my dreams, i think there were also many exhausting moments. it’s really important to look into the heart as much as the body, but i think i didn’t realize that back then, and i feel like i’m still learning that now. i believe i can stand here now because i endured that period well and because i understand that loneliness and pain as well. i hope for the environment where children and adolescents around the world can look into their hearts and ask for help without hesitation if they need it.

zzn.

17,286 views • 3 months ago