Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Starmer demanded an apology – Nigel Farage gave him a roasting on Chagos instead. Why do Chagossians human rights not count when Labour's packed with HR lawyers? Starmer loses his rag, rabidly telling people to vote Labour over Matt Goodwin in the by-election and uses Tommy Robinson's endorsement as... show more

🇬🇧UKJ0N🇬🇧

93,041 subscribers

102,762 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Юмор Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

‘For a Government that is full of human rights lawyers, why do the opinions and human rights of indigenous Chagossians not matter at all?’ Reform UK Nigel Farage grills Keir Starmer on the removal order of Chagossians from the Chagos Islands by the Labour Government.

‘For a Government that is full of human rights lawyers, why do the opinions and human rights of indigenous Chagossians not matter at all?’ Reform UK Nigel Farage grills Keir Starmer on the removal order of Chagossians from the Chagos Islands by the Labour Government.

GB News

32,416 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

2024: Keir Starmer, "Your government should treat every single person in this country with respect" 2026: Zarah Sultana uses parliamentary privilege to expose how Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper and Shabana Mahmood's proscription of a protest group - a proscription deemed unlawful by the High Court - is doing the opposite of what Starmer claimed in his first speech as PM Vote Labour out in the May elections, but do so in a way that does not vote Reform UK in

2024: Keir Starmer, "Your government should treat every single person in this country with respect" 2026: Zarah Sultana uses parliamentary privilege to expose how Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper and Shabana Mahmood's proscription of a protest group - a proscription deemed unlawful by the High Court - is doing the opposite of what Starmer claimed in his first speech as PM Vote Labour out in the May elections, but do so in a way that does not vote Reform UK in

Farrukh

38,833 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

BREAKING: Reform UK leader Nigel Farage announcing his resignation from Parliament before revealing he'll run in the by-election for his seat to let voters decide. Calling it a "people versus the establishment" contest, Farage says the people of Clacton—not the press—should be the judges of his political fate as he faces scrutiny over a $5 million donor gift and an ongoing parliamentary standards investigation.

BREAKING: Reform UK leader Nigel Farage announcing his resignation from Parliament before revealing he'll run in the by-election for his seat to let voters decide. Calling it a "people versus the establishment" contest, Farage says the people of Clacton—not the press—should be the judges of his political fate as he faces scrutiny over a $5 million donor gift and an ongoing parliamentary standards investigation.

Fox News

458,881 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 BREAKING: FARAGE DECLARES “THE END IS NEAR” FOR KEIR STARMER! In a blistering takedown, Nigel Farage has unleashed on the Prime Minister, branding him “the most unpatriotic, unBritish leader the country’s ever had!” Farage warns that a crushing defeat for Labour in their own heartlands on May 7 will spell disaster for Starmer and predicts he’ll be OUT of Downing Street by midsummer! I hope he’s right! The problem is Labour will still be in government and someone like Rayner will probably take over. She’s just as bad, if not worse. Only when the whole rotten lot are gone can Britain truly begin the road to recovery.

🚨 BREAKING: FARAGE DECLARES “THE END IS NEAR” FOR KEIR STARMER! In a blistering takedown, Nigel Farage has unleashed on the Prime Minister, branding him “the most unpatriotic, unBritish leader the country’s ever had!” Farage warns that a crushing defeat for Labour in their own heartlands on May 7 will spell disaster for Starmer and predicts he’ll be OUT of Downing Street by midsummer! I hope he’s right! The problem is Labour will still be in government and someone like Rayner will probably take over. She’s just as bad, if not worse. Only when the whole rotten lot are gone can Britain truly begin the road to recovery.

J Stewart

113,054 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Kemi Badenoch humiliates herself over the Chagos islands at PMQs She started by criticising Labour's action on the Chagos islands Keir Starmer explains it's a military base vital our national security, explaining that is why the Conservatives opened negotiations about sovereignty and securing the long term usage of the base Starmer adds that it was the Conservatives who conducted 11 of the 13 rounds of the negotiations Starmer adds that if Badenoch has been briefed on Chagos she understands the situation, and if she isn't officially briefed, "she's not doing her job, she's not concerned about national security" Badenoch then waffles a bit and insults Starmer Starmer observes she didn't say she was briefed about the Chagos islands saying "When she became leader of the opposition I said to her I would give her a briefing on any national security issue if she asked for it" "She has not asked for a briefing on the CHagos islands" "That's because she's more interested in chasing Reform, than in national security" Badenoch agains deflects saying, "He doesn't know what's going on" Starmer, "She doesn't even want to know what's going on otherwise she would have asked for the relevant briefing" Badenoch then claims she's speaking on behalf of the country and that "when Labour negotiates our country loses" Starmer, "All she does is come here every week carping from the sidelines talking our country down"

Kemi Badenoch humiliates herself over the Chagos islands at PMQs She started by criticising Labour's action on the Chagos islands Keir Starmer explains it's a military base vital our national security, explaining that is why the Conservatives opened negotiations about sovereignty and securing the long term usage of the base Starmer adds that it was the Conservatives who conducted 11 of the 13 rounds of the negotiations Starmer adds that if Badenoch has been briefed on Chagos she understands the situation, and if she isn't officially briefed, "she's not doing her job, she's not concerned about national security" Badenoch then waffles a bit and insults Starmer Starmer observes she didn't say she was briefed about the Chagos islands saying "When she became leader of the opposition I said to her I would give her a briefing on any national security issue if she asked for it" "She has not asked for a briefing on the CHagos islands" "That's because she's more interested in chasing Reform, than in national security" Badenoch agains deflects saying, "He doesn't know what's going on" Starmer, "She doesn't even want to know what's going on otherwise she would have asked for the relevant briefing" Badenoch then claims she's speaking on behalf of the country and that "when Labour negotiates our country loses" Starmer, "All she does is come here every week carping from the sidelines talking our country down"

Farrukh

237,910 просмотров • 1 год назад

All future elections in Britain will be decided by sectarian voting. All politics is now identity politics. Either pick a side or lose by default. Zack Polanski's Green Party decisively won last week's Gorton & Denton by-election in Manchester, beating Matt Goodwin and Reform UK by 4,402 votes, and putting Labour in third place. Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch, and Nigel Farage are all blaming sectarian and family voting because the Greens effectively mobilised the Muslim enclave in Gorton as an ethnic block vote. But Reform engaged in sectarianism too: unsuccessfully courting Muslim, Hindu, and Sikh voters, at the expense of the unrepresented white working class in Denton. No party spoke specifically to the British people, and so the majority stayed at home and didn't vote. You can't complain about sectarianism when you pander to minorities, only less successfully. You can’t represent the British people if you can’t define a British person. You can’t say "This is the last election," if you also insist that demographics aren't destiny. And you can't dismiss critics as "Very Online" if you make your living on Substack. All elections in Britain will be decided by sectarian voting. All politics is identity politics. Either pick a side or lose by default.

All future elections in Britain will be decided by sectarian voting. All politics is now identity politics. Either pick a side or lose by default. Zack Polanski's Green Party decisively won last week's Gorton & Denton by-election in Manchester, beating Matt Goodwin and Reform UK by 4,402 votes, and putting Labour in third place. Keir Starmer, Kemi Badenoch, and Nigel Farage are all blaming sectarian and family voting because the Greens effectively mobilised the Muslim enclave in Gorton as an ethnic block vote. But Reform engaged in sectarianism too: unsuccessfully courting Muslim, Hindu, and Sikh voters, at the expense of the unrepresented white working class in Denton. No party spoke specifically to the British people, and so the majority stayed at home and didn't vote. You can't complain about sectarianism when you pander to minorities, only less successfully. You can’t represent the British people if you can’t define a British person. You can’t say "This is the last election," if you also insist that demographics aren't destiny. And you can't dismiss critics as "Very Online" if you make your living on Substack. All elections in Britain will be decided by sectarian voting. All politics is identity politics. Either pick a side or lose by default.

Connor Tomlinson

23,684 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

'Is it all just a little too convenient for the anti-Farage forces?' Nigel Farage has resigned as MP for Clacton and will fight a by-election in an attempt to turn questions over his finances into a referendum on ‘the people vs the establishment’. Last year, Dominic Cummings told Michael and Maddie that he predicted there would at some point be a concerted attempt to destabilise Farage on a personal basis. Michael Gove Madeline Grant

'Is it all just a little too convenient for the anti-Farage forces?' Nigel Farage has resigned as MP for Clacton and will fight a by-election in an attempt to turn questions over his finances into a referendum on ‘the people vs the establishment’. Last year, Dominic Cummings told Michael and Maddie that he predicted there would at some point be a concerted attempt to destabilise Farage on a personal basis. Michael Gove Madeline Grant

The Spectator

63,564 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Bandna Chopra has walked away from Labour after 20 years of membership and 12 years serving as a Labour Councillor in Hounslow Borough — and her message is clear: Hounslow has been run into the ground. Public services are declining. Taxes keep rising. Knife crime is increasing. Fly-tipping is out of control. Grooming cases are not being taken seriously. And instead of fixing it, Labour politicians dismiss it as a “perception” problem. Bandna refuses to stand with a party that has become disconnected from the very people it was meant to serve. Politics should never be a career ladder — it should be about service, accountability, and real action. That’s why she joined Reform UK — the party of common sense. Hounslow needs Reform — Vote Reform. Get Reform. #british #reformuk #VoteReformUK #LabourParty #knifecrime Reform UK Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Nigel Farage Matt Goodwin Alex Wilson AM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧

Bandna Chopra has walked away from Labour after 20 years of membership and 12 years serving as a Labour Councillor in Hounslow Borough — and her message is clear: Hounslow has been run into the ground. Public services are declining. Taxes keep rising. Knife crime is increasing. Fly-tipping is out of control. Grooming cases are not being taken seriously. And instead of fixing it, Labour politicians dismiss it as a “perception” problem. Bandna refuses to stand with a party that has become disconnected from the very people it was meant to serve. Politics should never be a career ladder — it should be about service, accountability, and real action. That’s why she joined Reform UK — the party of common sense. Hounslow needs Reform — Vote Reform. Get Reform. #british #reformuk #VoteReformUK #LabourParty #knifecrime Reform UK Richard Tice MP 🇬🇧 Nigel Farage Matt Goodwin Alex Wilson AM 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🇬🇧

Prabhdeep Singh

30,415 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Victoria Derbyshire, "Keir Starmer telling Nigel Farage he has exploited the Henry Nowak case, is he right?" Telegraphs' Annabel Denham, "Err, no, I don't think the PM is right" Labour's Tom Hayes, "I'm just shocked by that, you've got a grieving family going through some of the worst experience anyone can ever know, and they've called on Nigel Farage not to exploit the death of their boy; and he literally did that in the House of Commons" "Nigel Farage was given the opportunity to condemn the violence, which he himself incited, by calling for protests. He could have condemned the violence" Annabel Denham, "Do you truly believe that the people in Southampton would have not taken to the streets in response to that sickening footage?" Tom Hayes, "I spoke to the Southampton MP, the vast majority of people in their city protesting, came from outside Southampton" "On top of that, Nigel Farage said this evening that there will be more to come"

Victoria Derbyshire, "Keir Starmer telling Nigel Farage he has exploited the Henry Nowak case, is he right?" Telegraphs' Annabel Denham, "Err, no, I don't think the PM is right" Labour's Tom Hayes, "I'm just shocked by that, you've got a grieving family going through some of the worst experience anyone can ever know, and they've called on Nigel Farage not to exploit the death of their boy; and he literally did that in the House of Commons" "Nigel Farage was given the opportunity to condemn the violence, which he himself incited, by calling for protests. He could have condemned the violence" Annabel Denham, "Do you truly believe that the people in Southampton would have not taken to the streets in response to that sickening footage?" Tom Hayes, "I spoke to the Southampton MP, the vast majority of people in their city protesting, came from outside Southampton" "On top of that, Nigel Farage said this evening that there will be more to come"

Farrukh

473,235 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands

The former RMT General Secretary Mick Lynch warned people about #KeirStarmer before the election. Most of the media laughed it off. Many in Labour dismissed him. But he understood exactly what Starmer represented. Lynch said Starmer’s Labour was managerial, not political. A party run by lawyers, advisors, and communications professionals rather than people rooted in labour history, trade unions, industry, or working-class communities. A party that believed in management, not representation. Stability, not change. Administration, not politics. He warned that if Starmer won, Labour would not govern as a movement, but as a management team. If anything, Lynch understated it. What we have seen is not a political Prime Minister but an administrative one. Government by briefing note, by focus group, by legal framing rather than political vision. A Labour Party reshaped from a political movement into something closer to a corporate structure with MPs. Under Starmer, Labour has been changed more fundamentally than even under Blair. Blair at least had a political project. Starmer’s project has been control. Centralise the party. Remove internal opposition. Sideline unions. Purge members. Control candidate selection. Control messaging. Control policy. The result is a Labour Party that is now barely recognisable as a working-class party, and barely recognisable even as a democratic political party. It behaves more like an administrative arm of the state than a movement representing the people. Alongside this has come something else that should worry anyone who cares about civil liberties. Expanding surveillance powers. Restrictions on protest. Speech laws framed as safety. Increasing police powers. More powers for the state, fewer rights for the citizen. All passed in the language of responsibility and stability. This is managerial politics. Not leadership, not representation, not democracy in the traditional labour movement sense. Management of the population. Management of expectations. Management of decline. Mick Lynch saw a managerial Labour Party coming. What he didn’t see was a Labour Party rebuilt as a machine: centrally controlled, staffed with loyalists, a government with authoritarian instincts and no roots in the labour movement at all, parachuting in MPs with little to no experience outside political offices, hand-picked acolytes from outfits like Labour Together, selected not for independence or service to their communities, but for loyalty to the leadership. MPs whose first duty is not to their constituents, not to their country, but to the party machine and the people who control it. Labour didn’t win power for the people. Starmer won power for the global oligarchy and that little club he's been a member of since 2019... Paul Knaggs , Labour Heartlands

The Heartlands Tribune

105,438 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reform UK continue to plateau in the polls, down 5-8 points from a 30 per cent peak last year. Indian national and Labour councillor Aaron Roy was welcomed on-stage by Farage, with fireworks and fanfare. But this, and previous Tory defectors, have estranged voters who want an authentic anti-establishment party. And Matt Goodwin continues to fight accusations that his new book, Suicide of a Nation, features false quotes, by asking ChatGPT to prove that ChatGPT didn't write the book for him. Last night's stream on how Reform has lost its aura:

Reform UK continue to plateau in the polls, down 5-8 points from a 30 per cent peak last year. Indian national and Labour councillor Aaron Roy was welcomed on-stage by Farage, with fireworks and fanfare. But this, and previous Tory defectors, have estranged voters who want an authentic anti-establishment party. And Matt Goodwin continues to fight accusations that his new book, Suicide of a Nation, features false quotes, by asking ChatGPT to prove that ChatGPT didn't write the book for him. Last night's stream on how Reform has lost its aura:

Connor Tomlinson

25,778 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Reducing the waffle down what Nigel Farage has said is "I would meet with Rupert Lowe MP but it is the members and voters of Reform UK that are telling me not to" When you extrapolate from the available polling data what Farage is arguing is simply not defensible Most polling shows active support for an agreement. An Daily Express poll, so not Reform UK specific but a close marker, put support for a deal between Farage and Lowe at 82% When looking at voting behaviour, formal polling shows 42% of Reform UK voters would back a Restore Britain candidate - compared to 33% who would back a Tory - if Reform UK had no candidate on the ballot. As per usual the ego of Nigel Farage on full display. He couldn't be honest, self-sacrificing or patriotic if his life depended on it

Reducing the waffle down what Nigel Farage has said is "I would meet with Rupert Lowe MP but it is the members and voters of Reform UK that are telling me not to" When you extrapolate from the available polling data what Farage is arguing is simply not defensible Most polling shows active support for an agreement. An Daily Express poll, so not Reform UK specific but a close marker, put support for a deal between Farage and Lowe at 82% When looking at voting behaviour, formal polling shows 42% of Reform UK voters would back a Restore Britain candidate - compared to 33% who would back a Tory - if Reform UK had no candidate on the ballot. As per usual the ego of Nigel Farage on full display. He couldn't be honest, self-sacrificing or patriotic if his life depended on it

Peter C. Barnes

15,497 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Fiona Bruce reads off a list of rude and cruel remarks made by Reform candidates Nigel Farage, "I don't know any of them" Fiona Bruce, "Why are you still standing them?" Nigel Farage, "Every party has problems in a snap election.. We paid a vetting company £144,000 to vet our candidates, they didn't do it" (The vetting company doesn't vet, it provides a service that you have to use yourself to vet.. That's like buying and oven and complaining the oven didn't cook your dinner for you) Fiona Bruce, "That's not the question I'm asking.. These comments by your candidates have been widely reported.. You don't need a vetting company.. Why are they still standing?" Nigel Farage, "I inherited a start up party" Fiona Bruce, "Why are they still standing?" Nigel Farage, "They're not, they've been disowned" Fiona Bruce, "Why are they still your candidates?" Nigel Farage, "I have no idea" Fiona Bruce, "You are leader" Nigel Farage, "I wasn't, I wasn't" Fiona Bruce, "You are now" Nigel Farage, "I inherited this, it was a start up party.. I paid a vetting company.. The work wasn't done" Fiona Bruce, "Now that I've pointed this out to you, are you going to withdraw your support from these people?" Nigel Farage, "I wouldn't want anything to do with them" Fiona Bruce, "So you have now withdrawn your support from these people?" Nigel Farage, "Yes, I want nothing to do with them"

Fiona Bruce reads off a list of rude and cruel remarks made by Reform candidates Nigel Farage, "I don't know any of them" Fiona Bruce, "Why are you still standing them?" Nigel Farage, "Every party has problems in a snap election.. We paid a vetting company £144,000 to vet our candidates, they didn't do it" (The vetting company doesn't vet, it provides a service that you have to use yourself to vet.. That's like buying and oven and complaining the oven didn't cook your dinner for you) Fiona Bruce, "That's not the question I'm asking.. These comments by your candidates have been widely reported.. You don't need a vetting company.. Why are they still standing?" Nigel Farage, "I inherited a start up party" Fiona Bruce, "Why are they still standing?" Nigel Farage, "They're not, they've been disowned" Fiona Bruce, "Why are they still your candidates?" Nigel Farage, "I have no idea" Fiona Bruce, "You are leader" Nigel Farage, "I wasn't, I wasn't" Fiona Bruce, "You are now" Nigel Farage, "I inherited this, it was a start up party.. I paid a vetting company.. The work wasn't done" Fiona Bruce, "Now that I've pointed this out to you, are you going to withdraw your support from these people?" Nigel Farage, "I wouldn't want anything to do with them" Fiona Bruce, "So you have now withdrawn your support from these people?" Nigel Farage, "Yes, I want nothing to do with them"

Farrukh

1,341,911 просмотров • 2 лет назад

‼️ WATCH: Extraordinary admission from Nigel Farage on #bbclaurak Reform’s £20,000 tax threshold was merely “an aspiration” written when the party “wasn’t going to win a single seat” and not a serious promise. So Reform knowingly offered voters promises it never expected to deliver. Now Farage proposes financing a smaller tax cut by removing benefits from British citizens, including people in work, while using migrants and people with anxiety as political cover. The insurgent mask is slipping. Beneath it lies the same old politics: divide ordinary people, cut their support and protect those with the money.

‼️ WATCH: Extraordinary admission from Nigel Farage on #bbclaurak Reform’s £20,000 tax threshold was merely “an aspiration” written when the party “wasn’t going to win a single seat” and not a serious promise. So Reform knowingly offered voters promises it never expected to deliver. Now Farage proposes financing a smaller tax cut by removing benefits from British citizens, including people in work, while using migrants and people with anxiety as political cover. The insurgent mask is slipping. Beneath it lies the same old politics: divide ordinary people, cut their support and protect those with the money.

Liz Webster

57,554 просмотров • 18 дней назад

Keir Starmer, "The £5,000,000 question is, why did the Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, keep this donation secret?" "I see he is not here to answer" "And what did the crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne (who has lived in Thailand for over 20 years) who is lining his pockets ask for in return?" "Those questions need to be answered. That's why Nigel Farage is not here" #PMQs Previously, Nigel Farage said it was campaigning for Brexit for the past 27 years And Ben Habib said that both Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson first received £1,000,000 each for Brexit, and then this additional £5,000,000 to Farage for Brexit It begs the question, why has Nigel Farage spent so much time trying to reduce tax on crypto transactions, the very business that his Brexit donor Christopher Harborne is involved in? If the gift was for Brexit and not lobbying to reduce tax on crypto transactions? Is it just a coincidence? And what about Boris Johnson, why does he get a free pass from scrutiny? Unless he's already declared the £1,000,000 that Christopher Harborne gave him according to Ben Habib? Brexiters campaigned for get rid of foreign influence in British politics, and according to Ben Habib, both Farage and Johnson were paid by a foreign-based billionaire to deliver Brexit, which is literally, foreign interference in our democracy At what point to Brexiters acknowledge that they've all been conned; the country is poorer, while the architects of Brexit, Johnson and Farage, both got a 7 figure gift for their services

Keir Starmer, "The £5,000,000 question is, why did the Reform UK leader, Nigel Farage, keep this donation secret?" "I see he is not here to answer" "And what did the crypto billionaire Christopher Harborne (who has lived in Thailand for over 20 years) who is lining his pockets ask for in return?" "Those questions need to be answered. That's why Nigel Farage is not here" #PMQs Previously, Nigel Farage said it was campaigning for Brexit for the past 27 years And Ben Habib said that both Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson first received £1,000,000 each for Brexit, and then this additional £5,000,000 to Farage for Brexit It begs the question, why has Nigel Farage spent so much time trying to reduce tax on crypto transactions, the very business that his Brexit donor Christopher Harborne is involved in? If the gift was for Brexit and not lobbying to reduce tax on crypto transactions? Is it just a coincidence? And what about Boris Johnson, why does he get a free pass from scrutiny? Unless he's already declared the £1,000,000 that Christopher Harborne gave him according to Ben Habib? Brexiters campaigned for get rid of foreign influence in British politics, and according to Ben Habib, both Farage and Johnson were paid by a foreign-based billionaire to deliver Brexit, which is literally, foreign interference in our democracy At what point to Brexiters acknowledge that they've all been conned; the country is poorer, while the architects of Brexit, Johnson and Farage, both got a 7 figure gift for their services

Farrukh

229,296 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The by-election in Gorton and Denton will have huge repercussions for Keir Starmer and Labour - but also for British democracy. It shows that democracy can't survive in a multicultural country, voting becomes a demographic head count. People no longer vote according to values or policy, they vote according to tribal loyalties and concerns. As the non-native population grows it will vote for redistribution of wealth from the native population, assisted by leftists who ally with them against their common enemies of "capitalism", "the nation state" and "attractive, successful people". This is already happening - look at the Green Party and their alliance with Islamists. Why did you think the left brought these people in? Unless British people realise what's happening and deal with it (unlikely because it would mean rejecting the national religion of multiculturalism, saying no to lefty women and being a bit mean to people who hate us), the best we can hope for is South Africanisation; a dwindling productive population squeezed by an increasingly bitter and entitled majority. Worst case scenario: Lebanon. Even worse scenario: Birmingham.

The by-election in Gorton and Denton will have huge repercussions for Keir Starmer and Labour - but also for British democracy. It shows that democracy can't survive in a multicultural country, voting becomes a demographic head count. People no longer vote according to values or policy, they vote according to tribal loyalties and concerns. As the non-native population grows it will vote for redistribution of wealth from the native population, assisted by leftists who ally with them against their common enemies of "capitalism", "the nation state" and "attractive, successful people". This is already happening - look at the Green Party and their alliance with Islamists. Why did you think the left brought these people in? Unless British people realise what's happening and deal with it (unlikely because it would mean rejecting the national religion of multiculturalism, saying no to lefty women and being a bit mean to people who hate us), the best we can hope for is South Africanisation; a dwindling productive population squeezed by an increasingly bitter and entitled majority. Worst case scenario: Lebanon. Even worse scenario: Birmingham.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

153,622 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад