正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"Starting December 27, Australians will now need to upload their ID every time they're logged in to do an internet search." "It's been put in place to stop kids engaging with adult content, but it actually affects all of us." "It'll link to your digital ID, or you'll use... show more

Wide Awake Media

840,656 subscribers

370,110 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Australia Just Normalized Mass Online ID Checks—Your Country Could Be Next Starting December 27, Australians will be forced to upload government ID every time they search the web while logged in. Google, Bing—it doesn’t matter. No ID, no search. The excuse? Protecting kids from adult content. The reality? A full-scale experiment in digital control. - Mandatory ID uploads for all users—teenagers, seniors, everyone. - Facial recognition or digital ID linking as the "convenient" alternative. - No opt-out. No transparency. Just compliance. This isn’t just about Australia. It’s a test case for global surveillance. Once the infrastructure exists, what’s stopping other governments from adopting it? Tracking searches? Censoring results? Who decides what you’re allowed to see? If this stands, your country will be next. The slippery slope starts here. Will you let them build it?

Australia Just Normalized Mass Online ID Checks—Your Country Could Be Next Starting December 27, Australians will be forced to upload government ID every time they search the web while logged in. Google, Bing—it doesn’t matter. No ID, no search. The excuse? Protecting kids from adult content. The reality? A full-scale experiment in digital control. - Mandatory ID uploads for all users—teenagers, seniors, everyone. - Facial recognition or digital ID linking as the "convenient" alternative. - No opt-out. No transparency. Just compliance. This isn’t just about Australia. It’s a test case for global surveillance. Once the infrastructure exists, what’s stopping other governments from adopting it? Tracking searches? Censoring results? Who decides what you’re allowed to see? If this stands, your country will be next. The slippery slope starts here. Will you let them build it?

Camus

132,755 次观看 • 10 个月前

We all know the real intent of the Digital ID agenda. The United Kingdom, with laws similar to ours, has shown alarming developments. In the last two weeks, British police have visited and advised hundreds of journalists and commentators to stop criticising the Starmer government’s policies. Some have even been arrested and imprisoned merely for expressing their opinions. The Digital ID, misinformation laws and facial verification systems are all part of the control mechanism that facilitates government surveillance and tyranny. The mask has come off quickly. Only recently, Minister Gallagher reassured Australians that digital IDs would not be compulsory. Yet, without one, life will become impossible. Now, there is a proposal to introduce age verification for social media. This would require every user—not just adults, as initially told to us, but also children—to have a digital ID. Age verification has never been successfully implemented anywhere in the world. The only way it can function is through a Digital ID with facial recognition, which would require constant re-scanning of the user’s face, potentially every minute, to confirm identity. This setup would necessitate keeping the computer camera permanently on, exposing children to significant privacy risks, including hacking. One Nation firmly believes that the best person to oversee internet use is the one present in the room with the children: their parents. We oppose intrusive government and support the primacy of the family in raising and protecting their children. Note: The Question Time video has been combined with the Motion to Take Note for sharing on social media.

We all know the real intent of the Digital ID agenda. The United Kingdom, with laws similar to ours, has shown alarming developments. In the last two weeks, British police have visited and advised hundreds of journalists and commentators to stop criticising the Starmer government’s policies. Some have even been arrested and imprisoned merely for expressing their opinions. The Digital ID, misinformation laws and facial verification systems are all part of the control mechanism that facilitates government surveillance and tyranny. The mask has come off quickly. Only recently, Minister Gallagher reassured Australians that digital IDs would not be compulsory. Yet, without one, life will become impossible. Now, there is a proposal to introduce age verification for social media. This would require every user—not just adults, as initially told to us, but also children—to have a digital ID. Age verification has never been successfully implemented anywhere in the world. The only way it can function is through a Digital ID with facial recognition, which would require constant re-scanning of the user’s face, potentially every minute, to confirm identity. This setup would necessitate keeping the computer camera permanently on, exposing children to significant privacy risks, including hacking. One Nation firmly believes that the best person to oversee internet use is the one present in the room with the children: their parents. We oppose intrusive government and support the primacy of the family in raising and protecting their children. Note: The Question Time video has been combined with the Motion to Take Note for sharing on social media.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

84,101 次观看 • 1 年前

⚠️Digital ID + facial recognition Snuck into the digital ID consultation is an admission that the police would be allowed to repurpose our digital ID photos as mugshots to create a population-wide facial recognition database. It is for precisely this reason that the public is rightly sceptical of a sprawling ID system that has been sold to us under various guises - whether to 'stop the boats' or improve public services - but which invariably hands more power and more of our personal information to the state, at our expense.

⚠️Digital ID + facial recognition Snuck into the digital ID consultation is an admission that the police would be allowed to repurpose our digital ID photos as mugshots to create a population-wide facial recognition database. It is for precisely this reason that the public is rightly sceptical of a sprawling ID system that has been sold to us under various guises - whether to 'stop the boats' or improve public services - but which invariably hands more power and more of our personal information to the state, at our expense.

Big Brother Watch

43,426 次观看 • 5 个月前

Under the guise of protecting children a surveillance system is being put in place to track all Australians. Digital IDs/facial recognition to use social media, google search engines and maps. They can track your movements, know where you live and fine/arrest you for saying something against their narratives. Don’t think they won’t.

Under the guise of protecting children a surveillance system is being put in place to track all Australians. Digital IDs/facial recognition to use social media, google search engines and maps. They can track your movements, know where you live and fine/arrest you for saying something against their narratives. Don’t think they won’t.

Kat A 🌸

38,381 次观看 • 1 年前

Digital freedom isn't a myth. It's a right worth protecting. For years, we've been told to trade a little privacy for a little more safety. To share more data. To verify more identities. To accept more surveillance. The reasons may change : fighting crime, protecting children, improving security, but every time we give up a piece of our privacy, we should ask one simple question: Is it worth the cost? Privacy isn't something only criminals need. It's something every ordinary person deserves. As Pavel Durov said: "In the world of AI, if we give up our right to privacy, every message that we send will be monitored. Every thought will be scored. Every relationship will be mapped." Let's protect digital freedom before it becomes something we only remember. This is my entry for the Pavel Durov Digital Freedom Content competition. #digitalfreedom

Digital freedom isn't a myth. It's a right worth protecting. For years, we've been told to trade a little privacy for a little more safety. To share more data. To verify more identities. To accept more surveillance. The reasons may change : fighting crime, protecting children, improving security, but every time we give up a piece of our privacy, we should ask one simple question: Is it worth the cost? Privacy isn't something only criminals need. It's something every ordinary person deserves. As Pavel Durov said: "In the world of AI, if we give up our right to privacy, every message that we send will be monitored. Every thought will be scored. Every relationship will be mapped." Let's protect digital freedom before it becomes something we only remember. This is my entry for the Pavel Durov Digital Freedom Content competition. #digitalfreedom

dOcToR sMaRt 🇪🇸

11,767 次观看 • 2 个月前

It has been 322 days since Donald Trump was sworn in and the GOP still hasn’t passed a Nationwide Voter ID mandate Elon Musk “It’a hard to believe this is even real but California passed a law making it illegal to require voter ID in any election at all in California. Newsom signed it into law — It's illegal to require an ID. In any election, even a town council.” “And a friend of mine who lives in Palo Alto was like, Is this actually real? And went to vote in some city council election. He tried to show them his ID, and they said, We're not even allowed to look at your ID.”

It has been 322 days since Donald Trump was sworn in and the GOP still hasn’t passed a Nationwide Voter ID mandate Elon Musk “It’a hard to believe this is even real but California passed a law making it illegal to require voter ID in any election at all in California. Newsom signed it into law — It's illegal to require an ID. In any election, even a town council.” “And a friend of mine who lives in Palo Alto was like, Is this actually real? And went to vote in some city council election. He tried to show them his ID, and they said, We're not even allowed to look at your ID.”

Wall Street Apes

156,843 次观看 • 8 个月前

The government is banning social media for under-16s, to "protect children". But if protecting British kids is a priority, why don't they ban illegal migrants? I'm not saying Instagram is great, but I've never seen it drag a kid from the swings in a playground in Nuneaton and subject it to a terrifying assault. And won't this just push kids to use VPNs or burner phones or even seek out the local noncer to use his gnarled face to bypass the facial scanning age verification? This isn't about kids - this is digital ID by the back door. Adults will have to scan their faces and enter personal info to get online. And tech companies have a history of collaborating with leftwing governments (eg the Hunter Biden laptop scandal). With facial recognition technology used at protests, the government will be able to clamp down on dissent online and offline.

The government is banning social media for under-16s, to "protect children". But if protecting British kids is a priority, why don't they ban illegal migrants? I'm not saying Instagram is great, but I've never seen it drag a kid from the swings in a playground in Nuneaton and subject it to a terrifying assault. And won't this just push kids to use VPNs or burner phones or even seek out the local noncer to use his gnarled face to bypass the facial scanning age verification? This isn't about kids - this is digital ID by the back door. Adults will have to scan their faces and enter personal info to get online. And tech companies have a history of collaborating with leftwing governments (eg the Hunter Biden laptop scandal). With facial recognition technology used at protests, the government will be able to clamp down on dissent online and offline.

Leo Kearse - see me on tour! Links in bio

12,636 次观看 • 2 个月前

Digital ID impositions along with drones and live facial recognition rolled out by the Met today in Soho and elsewhere without any debate or manifesto, we now have control zones, 15 minute cities, fines, cameras,, a counter-disinformation unit, the Lockdown Files, the Twitter Files. And now the state is saying that to protect the children, they are going to get Big Tech to do it for three months. Let us see. But how are they actually going to do it. The only way is through a digital ID to verify who you are. We saw this already with Online Safety Act and it’s become a censors charter yet not ‘protected children’ so now they want ban vpns as Australia is a fail Andy Burnham has said he’s against digital id. So stop this madness now then Meanwhile we shall continue to insist on our privacy autonomy & liberty together The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship Together

Digital ID impositions along with drones and live facial recognition rolled out by the Met today in Soho and elsewhere without any debate or manifesto, we now have control zones, 15 minute cities, fines, cameras,, a counter-disinformation unit, the Lockdown Files, the Twitter Files. And now the state is saying that to protect the children, they are going to get Big Tech to do it for three months. Let us see. But how are they actually going to do it. The only way is through a digital ID to verify who you are. We saw this already with Online Safety Act and it’s become a censors charter yet not ‘protected children’ so now they want ban vpns as Australia is a fail Andy Burnham has said he’s against digital id. So stop this madness now then Meanwhile we shall continue to insist on our privacy autonomy & liberty together The Alliance for Responsible Citizenship Together

Alan D Miller

12,882 次观看 • 2 个月前

Neil Oliver: "And so, back, one last time, to digital ID and why I say it won't work. It won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe, safe from us. It won't work because in the end, as always, it's only about money, money taken from us the many and seized by them the few." "It won't work because, on account of their hubris, the oligarchs have actually revealed to us what they're all about. Bad actors, bad scripts, bad special effects, disastrous production values all round. Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be able to make this country and the people living in it safe." "But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place and for this people. Too many see that those who loathe us and our ancient homeland, those who would replace it and us with something without meaning, just a stepping stone to money and control, those that are committed to a new world order in which the mass of us are nothing more than captive slaves, captive to an anti-human ideology. Too many people see it." "Digital ID was supposed to be their grand finale, the big finish, but it's never about what they say it's about. Bad actors, the lot of them, acting in bad faith and with malice in mind. I'm telling you now, on account of all I've just said, digital ID, it won't work."

Neil Oliver: "And so, back, one last time, to digital ID and why I say it won't work. It won't work because it's not built and never was intended to make any of us safe but, on the contrary, to make the oligarchs safe, safe from us. It won't work because in the end, as always, it's only about money, money taken from us the many and seized by them the few." "It won't work because, on account of their hubris, the oligarchs have actually revealed to us what they're all about. Bad actors, bad scripts, bad special effects, disastrous production values all round. Digital ID won't work because the sales pitch is supposed to be able to make this country and the people living in it safe." "But too many people see that the directors of the disastrous bad acting have nothing but contempt for this place and for this people. Too many see that those who loathe us and our ancient homeland, those who would replace it and us with something without meaning, just a stepping stone to money and control, those that are committed to a new world order in which the mass of us are nothing more than captive slaves, captive to an anti-human ideology. Too many people see it." "Digital ID was supposed to be their grand finale, the big finish, but it's never about what they say it's about. Bad actors, the lot of them, acting in bad faith and with malice in mind. I'm telling you now, on account of all I've just said, digital ID, it won't work."

Camus

204,433 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 "THIS IS ACTUALLY ALL ABOUT CONTROLLING PEOPLE" During my interview with Ben Swann, a stark warning was issued about the UK's proposed digital ID system. "They're going to say perhaps it's voluntary to start with." "They're going to say how convenient it is." "But behind the scenes... this is actually all about controlling people." The concern raised was not immigration. It was the potential for digital ID systems to be expanded over time, affecting privacy, employment, access to services and freedom of expression. Watch the clip and decide for yourself. Ben Swann Truth In Media

🚨 "THIS IS ACTUALLY ALL ABOUT CONTROLLING PEOPLE" During my interview with Ben Swann, a stark warning was issued about the UK's proposed digital ID system. "They're going to say perhaps it's voluntary to start with." "They're going to say how convenient it is." "But behind the scenes... this is actually all about controlling people." The concern raised was not immigration. It was the potential for digital ID systems to be expanded over time, affecting privacy, employment, access to services and freedom of expression. Watch the clip and decide for yourself. Ben Swann Truth In Media

Jim Ferguson

11,185 次观看 • 2 个月前

"If you sign up for digital ID... you'll never be able to say no to the government again." British ex-MP Andrew Bridgen: "They can only implement all the aspects of Agenda 2030... if they have digital ID." "If we can stop digital ID, it's very, very difficult to see how we can end up with the dystopian future which I believe is in line for us." "Digital ID will be a massive tool of control. It'll always be sold to you as it's for your own convenience and for your own security, and there's an old saying that if you're ever willing to trade your freedom for security, you'll end up with neither freedom nor security." "We will be like prisoners out on license, where we're tagged and they'll know exactly where we are and what we're doing all the time." "That can't be allowed to happen." Credit: Andrew Bridgen Russell Brand

Wide Awake Media

167,763 次观看 • 11 个月前

REPORT: Republicans are now advancing a federal version of the same digital ID system sweeping through Texas, the U.K., and Australia—proving this agenda isn’t partisan, it’s coordinated and global. Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. John James have introduced the “App Store Accountability Act,” claiming it will protect children online. But hidden in the fine print is vague language on “age verification” and “parental consent,” with no clear explanation of how it works—or who controls it. In practice, Americans could soon be required to upload their government ID or submit biometric data to an “approved provider” just to prove they’re adults. Parents would be forced to link their digital profiles to their children’s, giving unknown third parties access to both. It’s the same pattern already unfolding in the U.K. and Australia, where officials now admit Digital ID will be used for “age assurance.” Once implemented, every click, post, and purchase can be tracked and restricted—all under the guise of child safety. This isn’t about protecting children—it’s about controlling you. If Americans don’t act now, digital freedom will disappear before their eyes. reveals how close they are to locking it in.

REPORT: Republicans are now advancing a federal version of the same digital ID system sweeping through Texas, the U.K., and Australia—proving this agenda isn’t partisan, it’s coordinated and global. Sen. Mike Lee and Rep. John James have introduced the “App Store Accountability Act,” claiming it will protect children online. But hidden in the fine print is vague language on “age verification” and “parental consent,” with no clear explanation of how it works—or who controls it. In practice, Americans could soon be required to upload their government ID or submit biometric data to an “approved provider” just to prove they’re adults. Parents would be forced to link their digital profiles to their children’s, giving unknown third parties access to both. It’s the same pattern already unfolding in the U.K. and Australia, where officials now admit Digital ID will be used for “age assurance.” Once implemented, every click, post, and purchase can be tracked and restricted—all under the guise of child safety. This isn’t about protecting children—it’s about controlling you. If Americans don’t act now, digital freedom will disappear before their eyes. reveals how close they are to locking it in.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

216,688 次观看 • 10 个月前

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Well said Senator Antic, but the only problem is that you are member of the Liberal Party and the Liberal Party supports Albanese’s plan to force all Australia have some form of government issued or biometric digital ID to log on to the internet. Senator ANTIC (South Australia) (16:46): I think we all want to see our children protected from harm online, but what's the real cost of a social media ban for children? Firstly, it's not clear to me how an age-specific ban could actually be in force short of requiring all Australians to prove their identity, and therefore their age, before actually using their social media accounts. How would it be done? The only reliable methods that are likely to work are those which require social media accounts to be linked to either a government certified ID, digital ID or biometric data. Immediately, we've gone from talking about a law protecting children under 16 from online harm to proposals potentially requiring all Australians to submit personal identification as a condition of using social media. This is how concerns over safety—in this case, children's safety—convince people to hand over their freedom, to hand over their personal information. Of course, this has nothing to do with the fact that a generation of young people are starting to unpick the lies of the corporate media online, does it? Well, of course it does! What a great way to ensure that young people only get a left-wing government message approved to them via their devices. Frankly, the words 'ban' and 'media' should never exist in a sentence together, and parents should always be in charge of what their children watch and what their children watch online.

Craig Kelly:🇦🇺Foundation for Economic Education

28,750 次观看 • 1 年前

When governments in the West find a new tool they like, first they test it abroad, and soon it lands in Washington. The UK is now rolling out a digital ID that will start as a “modernization” on your phone and become mandatory for the right to work by the end of this Parliament. No digital ID? No job. Period. King Charles calls it "progress". Supporters promise less fraud and easier services. But critics see the real danger. Once this “secure credential” exists, it'll be into the ultimate gatekeeper, logging every check, every service, every move into a lifelong government dossier. And the price tag? Up to £20 billion, while public services are already stretched thin and no one has proven it will actually save money or deliver results. Facial recognition, centralized databases, digital wallets that “dial home” every time you use it. Connect the dots and you get exactly what digital rights advocates are warning about: tools of convenience that become tools of control. A former MP put it bluntly: “Say yes to digital ID and you’ll never be able to say no to your government again.” Hundreds of thousands of Brits are protesting and petitioning, but the machine keeps moving. That tells you everything you need to know about who this system is really built to serve. The question isn’t what digital ID is today. It’s what it will inevitably become tomorrow. Wake up, Britain.

When governments in the West find a new tool they like, first they test it abroad, and soon it lands in Washington. The UK is now rolling out a digital ID that will start as a “modernization” on your phone and become mandatory for the right to work by the end of this Parliament. No digital ID? No job. Period. King Charles calls it "progress". Supporters promise less fraud and easier services. But critics see the real danger. Once this “secure credential” exists, it'll be into the ultimate gatekeeper, logging every check, every service, every move into a lifelong government dossier. And the price tag? Up to £20 billion, while public services are already stretched thin and no one has proven it will actually save money or deliver results. Facial recognition, centralized databases, digital wallets that “dial home” every time you use it. Connect the dots and you get exactly what digital rights advocates are warning about: tools of convenience that become tools of control. A former MP put it bluntly: “Say yes to digital ID and you’ll never be able to say no to your government again.” Hundreds of thousands of Brits are protesting and petitioning, but the machine keeps moving. That tells you everything you need to know about who this system is really built to serve. The question isn’t what digital ID is today. It’s what it will inevitably become tomorrow. Wake up, Britain.

Ben Swann

40,979 次观看 • 2 个月前

"It's right out of the UN's Agenda 2030." Dr. Renée Hoenderkamp: The UK government's attempt to impose digital ID has nothing to do with "security" or "controlling migration", and everything to do with "surveillance and control". "The next step on from here is digital money... Your wages, your savings, your spending, your travel—all linked to your digital ID." "Step out of line, say something they don't like, and they will switch you off. No travel, no car, no spending, no life." "And if you agree to it, you are agreeing to shackle yourself to a life without an ounce of freedom henceforth."

"It's right out of the UN's Agenda 2030." Dr. Renée Hoenderkamp: The UK government's attempt to impose digital ID has nothing to do with "security" or "controlling migration", and everything to do with "surveillance and control". "The next step on from here is digital money... Your wages, your savings, your spending, your travel—all linked to your digital ID." "Step out of line, say something they don't like, and they will switch you off. No travel, no car, no spending, no life." "And if you agree to it, you are agreeing to shackle yourself to a life without an ounce of freedom henceforth."

Wide Awake Media

53,393 次观看 • 10 个月前

Digital ID Warning!. Una McGurk, Senior Counsel, with a powerful message calling on people to join together to RESIST the Irish government's plans to implement mandatory Digital ID through the back door. The government have already announced plans to put legislation in place later in 2026 to link Digital ID with social media. It is up to the Irish people to join as a collective force and push back with all our might to STOP the government in their tracks. We did it against the Hate Speech Bill. We did it against the Referendum. We achieved the highest ever recorded spoilt votes in the history of Ireland, and indeed Europe. We CAN do it again. Digital ID is the line we must not cross or forever regret it. Join Una McGurk in campaigning to push back against the government's attempts to implement a dystopian surveillance Digital ID society through the back door, whereby your every movement will be monitored, traced, tracked and controlled. #NoDigitalID

Digital ID Warning!. Una McGurk, Senior Counsel, with a powerful message calling on people to join together to RESIST the Irish government's plans to implement mandatory Digital ID through the back door. The government have already announced plans to put legislation in place later in 2026 to link Digital ID with social media. It is up to the Irish people to join as a collective force and push back with all our might to STOP the government in their tracks. We did it against the Hate Speech Bill. We did it against the Referendum. We achieved the highest ever recorded spoilt votes in the history of Ireland, and indeed Europe. We CAN do it again. Digital ID is the line we must not cross or forever regret it. Join Una McGurk in campaigning to push back against the government's attempts to implement a dystopian surveillance Digital ID society through the back door, whereby your every movement will be monitored, traced, tracked and controlled. #NoDigitalID

Lawyers For Justice Ireland

139,059 次观看 • 7 个月前

As Whitney Webb outlines, the plan is to inextricably link a formal, government-ID-linked profile to your internet access, ISP, and social media accounts. The goal? A centralized database of everything you read and consume online, all under the guise of solving bot activity and illegal immigration. Who's behind it? The push traces back to entities like the ID2020 Alliance—founded by Microsoft, Accenture, and the Rockefeller Foundation—now folded into larger alliances with the same funders. This is about creating a global system of financial and social control. The sales pitch is tailored: • To the RIGHT: It's a tool to stop illegal immigration. • To the LEFT: It's a shield against hate speech and a way to protect children. The system will appear "vendor-agnostic," with different providers in different countries, but all data will be exportable in the same format to the same centralized database. This is the illusion of decentralization to mask a truly centralized control grid. This digital ID is the key that unlocks the next phase: programmable, surveillable digital currency (both CBDCs and private versions from banks like JP Morgan). It’s the foundation for a public-private partnership that will determine your ability to participate in the digital economy and society. The endgame? An internet where economic, social, and educational activity requires a digital ID. A world where your online presence—validated by this ID—could be tied to a gig-economy-style social credit system based on clicks and likes. And in this "verified" world, who controls the bots? Governments and militaries openly admit to using bot farms for narrative management. The very institutions promoting this system are the ones who weaponize disinformation. This isn't just about an ID; it's about building the infrastructure for a totalitarian panopticon, sold to us as convenience and security.

Camus

374,745 次观看 • 11 个月前

"You need to contact your MP and tell them you do not want digital ID." "It's time for us as people to stand up against this globalist agenda." "They want to control what you spend, where you spend, who you're with, where you go, your carbon footprint. Everything will be on that [digital ID]." "We know it's all part of an agenda, and we know what that agenda is." "We say no to digital ID." Credit: Richard Taylor

"You need to contact your MP and tell them you do not want digital ID." "It's time for us as people to stand up against this globalist agenda." "They want to control what you spend, where you spend, who you're with, where you go, your carbon footprint. Everything will be on that [digital ID]." "We know it's all part of an agenda, and we know what that agenda is." "We say no to digital ID." Credit: Richard Taylor

Wide Awake Media

15,569 次观看 • 11 个月前