Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Starting Rocket Lab without $100M "We knew that we could never outspend our competitors. That was just never ever going to be a thing. The reason why the Rutherford engine is named after Ernest Rutherford is because he had a very famous saying: "We have no money, so we...

ti_morse's profile picture

Ti Morse

21,702 subscribers

18,401 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

$RKLB New Peter Beck interview today on Bloomberg: Does SpaceX's dominance threaten Rocket Lab? "No, I don't think so. The reality is SpaceX is a space company, but also very much an AI company and a bunch of other things as well. Rocket Lab is a very squarely focused pure play space company. I think it draws investors into the sector. And when they go looking, Rocket Lab is really the clear number two with respect to launch frequency and those kinds of things. So no, I'm not too worried about that.” "So do you find yourself complementary to SpaceX? Or are you in direct competition with Elon Musk?" "In some cases we are in direct competition, but also very complementary. We are an end-to-end space company. We're the second most frequently launched US rocket in the world behind SpaceX, so the rocket bit is competitive. But two-thirds of our business is building satellites and spacecraft and supplying components to the rest of the space industry. So in that sense, not really a competitor at all."
1:13

$RKLB New Peter Beck interview today on Bloomberg: Does SpaceX's dominance threaten Rocket Lab? "No, I don't think so. The reality is SpaceX is a space company, but also very much an AI company and a bunch of other things as well. Rocket Lab is a very squarely focused pure play space company. I think it draws investors into the sector. And when they go looking, Rocket Lab is really the clear number two with respect to launch frequency and those kinds of things. So no, I'm not too worried about that.” "So do you find yourself complementary to SpaceX? Or are you in direct competition with Elon Musk?" "In some cases we are in direct competition, but also very complementary. We are an end-to-end space company. We're the second most frequently launched US rocket in the world behind SpaceX, so the rocket bit is competitive. But two-thirds of our business is building satellites and spacecraft and supplying components to the rest of the space industry. So in that sense, not really a competitor at all."

ValueOverPrice

51,585 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

$RKLB Rocket lab discussed on Schwab again. "We are telling investors right now, be weary of SpaceX, because it's likely that name is going to be bid higher for retailers off the back of the IPO. And I think that looking at companies like Rocket Lab, for instance, as a good opportunity to still get involved in the space exploration, putting artificial intelligence data centers into space. That's a really strong company. It's got a lot of strong earnings. The margins continue to grow."
0:50

$RKLB Rocket lab discussed on Schwab again. "We are telling investors right now, be weary of SpaceX, because it's likely that name is going to be bid higher for retailers off the back of the IPO. And I think that looking at companies like Rocket Lab, for instance, as a good opportunity to still get involved in the space exploration, putting artificial intelligence data centers into space. That's a really strong company. It's got a lot of strong earnings. The margins continue to grow."

ValueOverPrice

32,573 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck breaks the entire space industry into 3 simple layers, from rockets to the services we use every day: "I probably shouldn't have called it Rocket Lab. I should have called it Space Lab. The rocket always steals the show because it's this big roaring stick in the sky." "Rockets, that's about a $10 or $20 billion industry. Spacecraft, the tools in space to provide services, 20 to $30 billion. And then the reason why you do all of those things are applications in space." "Space is kinda weird that it's hidden infrastructure. You don't drive past it every day, so you don't see it. But everybody interfaces with space every single day, whether you realize it or not." "We build rockets, we build satellites, and with our acquisition of Iridium, we're also a services company from space." Rocket Lab
1:32

Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck breaks the entire space industry into 3 simple layers, from rockets to the services we use every day: "I probably shouldn't have called it Rocket Lab. I should have called it Space Lab. The rocket always steals the show because it's this big roaring stick in the sky." "Rockets, that's about a $10 or $20 billion industry. Spacecraft, the tools in space to provide services, 20 to $30 billion. And then the reason why you do all of those things are applications in space." "Space is kinda weird that it's hidden infrastructure. You don't drive past it every day, so you don't see it. But everybody interfaces with space every single day, whether you realize it or not." "We build rockets, we build satellites, and with our acquisition of Iridium, we're also a services company from space." Rocket Lab

MTS

231,053 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

$RKLB Neutron will be the largest carbon fiber structure to ever fly once it's completed. Some critics say it's not realistic because it would be the first carbon fiber structure of that size to fly, but I'd argue Rocket Lab is pretty good at firsts: "We were the first to 3D print a rocket engine and put it into orbit. We were the first to do an all carbon composite rocket and put it into orbit. We were the first to do all fiber optically networked avionics suite on a launch vehicle and put it into orbit." — Sir Peter Beck, Rocket Lab CEO
0:43

$RKLB Neutron will be the largest carbon fiber structure to ever fly once it's completed. Some critics say it's not realistic because it would be the first carbon fiber structure of that size to fly, but I'd argue Rocket Lab is pretty good at firsts: "We were the first to 3D print a rocket engine and put it into orbit. We were the first to do an all carbon composite rocket and put it into orbit. We were the first to do all fiber optically networked avionics suite on a launch vehicle and put it into orbit." — Sir Peter Beck, Rocket Lab CEO

ValueOverPrice

27,984 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Apple's Eddy Cue reveals the logic behind charging $0.99 a song when the company launched iTunes Store in 2003, despite the fact that Apple would lose money at that price: "There were two keys to $0.99 that we really believed in, and people didn't see." "Number one is when the price is $0.99, and it's consistent, you never have to think about price." "The second thing was that people could never do that, because at $0.99, if you're charging a credit card, you would lose money. Because credit cards have a fixed fee and a percentage that you pay." "Well, the fixed fee and the percentage you pay on a $0.99 song was like a quarter, and the vast majority of the [rest of] the money went to the labels. So every time we'd sell a song, we'd lose money. Nobody wanted to do that." "What we decided to do is, as we were building this — and it was a huge discussion, because we would lose a ton of money — we said, 'Look, this thing is amazing. You're not going to buy just one song, you're going to buy a lot of songs.'" "'And when you do that, instead of closing the transaction on every single one, why don't we just combine them over a period of time? Let's keep the transaction open for a period of time — let's call it 24 hours, or 8 hours. And everything you buy, we're just going to give you, then we're going to charge you at the end.'" "And that's exactly what happened. Very few transactions were just $0.99. Most of the transactions were multiple dollars. And the fixed fee didn't matter."
1:52

Apple's Eddy Cue reveals the logic behind charging $0.99 a song when the company launched iTunes Store in 2003, despite the fact that Apple would lose money at that price: "There were two keys to $0.99 that we really believed in, and people didn't see." "Number one is when the price is $0.99, and it's consistent, you never have to think about price." "The second thing was that people could never do that, because at $0.99, if you're charging a credit card, you would lose money. Because credit cards have a fixed fee and a percentage that you pay." "Well, the fixed fee and the percentage you pay on a $0.99 song was like a quarter, and the vast majority of the [rest of] the money went to the labels. So every time we'd sell a song, we'd lose money. Nobody wanted to do that." "What we decided to do is, as we were building this — and it was a huge discussion, because we would lose a ton of money — we said, 'Look, this thing is amazing. You're not going to buy just one song, you're going to buy a lot of songs.'" "'And when you do that, instead of closing the transaction on every single one, why don't we just combine them over a period of time? Let's keep the transaction open for a period of time — let's call it 24 hours, or 8 hours. And everything you buy, we're just going to give you, then we're going to charge you at the end.'" "And that's exactly what happened. Very few transactions were just $0.99. Most of the transactions were multiple dollars. And the fixed fee didn't matter."

TBPN

2,404,178 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

BREAKING: Inside Rocket Lab's ( $RKLB ) Engine Development Center How Archimedes & Rutherford are made FACTORY TOUR (Part III) Sir Peter Beck walks us through Rocket Lab's engine factory in Long Beach, CA. It used to be Sir Richard Branson's $1.2B Virgin Orbit's facility. When it went bankrupt, Rocket Lab bought the building & every machine in it for $16M against over $100M of assets. I asked if he keeps a list of which companies might d*e next.. he said yes. Roughly 10 people now run one of the largest 3D print shops in the industry, turning out a Rutherford engine every day and an Archimedes every 8 days. We cover: › Buying a competitor's factory for 16 cents on the dollar › Why space companies are almost impossible to k*ll › Why Archimedes was designed to be the most boring engine possible › Why it qualifies on 1 hour of runtime & Rutherford on 5 minutes › The hot fire that ate its own injector and kept running Plus: whether investors are any good at space diligence, methane vs kerosene & the soot problem, the machine arriving next year that prints a whole engine in one go, & Beck's hot take on where the industry actually is. Rocket Lab Week: › Part I: Full interview w/ Sir Peter Beck › Part II / Tour 01: Rocket Lab HQ, Mission Control & Satellite Manufacturing › Part III / Tour 02: Rocket Lab’s Engine Development Center, Rutherford & Archimedes 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Sir Peter Beck, Founder & CEO at Rocket Lab (00:48) Buying a $100M building for $16M (02:30) Why Space companies never die (04:15) Where Rocket Lab's engines actually get built (06:55) Biggest differences: Archimedes & Rutherford (07:56) This is where Rocket Lab actually tests its Engines (10:01) How 12 lasers print a Rocket engine part (15:04) A full walkthrough of the Electron Rocket (16:29) Why Iridium was just the beginning (18:35) Methane vs. Kerosene: why it matters (19:28) Why Reusability creates its own set of problems (24:17) What makes a Vacuum Engine different (26:39) The future of Space
28:02

BREAKING: Inside Rocket Lab's ( $RKLB ) Engine Development Center How Archimedes & Rutherford are made FACTORY TOUR (Part III) Sir Peter Beck walks us through Rocket Lab's engine factory in Long Beach, CA. It used to be Sir Richard Branson's $1.2B Virgin Orbit's facility. When it went bankrupt, Rocket Lab bought the building & every machine in it for $16M against over $100M of assets. I asked if he keeps a list of which companies might d*e next.. he said yes. Roughly 10 people now run one of the largest 3D print shops in the industry, turning out a Rutherford engine every day and an Archimedes every 8 days. We cover: › Buying a competitor's factory for 16 cents on the dollar › Why space companies are almost impossible to k*ll › Why Archimedes was designed to be the most boring engine possible › Why it qualifies on 1 hour of runtime & Rutherford on 5 minutes › The hot fire that ate its own injector and kept running Plus: whether investors are any good at space diligence, methane vs kerosene & the soot problem, the machine arriving next year that prints a whole engine in one go, & Beck's hot take on where the industry actually is. Rocket Lab Week: › Part I: Full interview w/ Sir Peter Beck › Part II / Tour 01: Rocket Lab HQ, Mission Control & Satellite Manufacturing › Part III / Tour 02: Rocket Lab’s Engine Development Center, Rutherford & Archimedes 𝐓𝐈𝐌𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐀𝐌𝐏𝐒 (00:00) Sir Peter Beck, Founder & CEO at Rocket Lab (00:48) Buying a $100M building for $16M (02:30) Why Space companies never die (04:15) Where Rocket Lab's engines actually get built (06:55) Biggest differences: Archimedes & Rutherford (07:56) This is where Rocket Lab actually tests its Engines (10:01) How 12 lasers print a Rocket engine part (15:04) A full walkthrough of the Electron Rocket (16:29) Why Iridium was just the beginning (18:35) Methane vs. Kerosene: why it matters (19:28) Why Reusability creates its own set of problems (24:17) What makes a Vacuum Engine different (26:39) The future of Space

Molly O’Shea

445,911 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Elon Musk: I started reading about rockets to understand why they're so freaking expensive. “I started reading quite a bit about rockets to try to understand why they're so freaking expensive. Where does the $60 million go for the Delta II? Now Delta II, I think, is $100 million or something, some crazy number. And Delta II is a relatively small rocket. If you go to one of the bigger rockets, it's anywhere from $200 to $400 million. Anyway, so I came to the conclusion that there wasn't really a good reason for rockets to be so expensive, and that they could be a lot less. Even in an expendable format, they could be less. And that if one could make them reusable, like airplanes, then the cost of rocketry would drop dramatically, the cost of space travel would drop dramatically. Because the cost of the fuel was maybe anywhere from 0.2% to 0.5% of the cost of the rocket. It's like a plane. How much is the cost of the fuel in the plane versus the plane itself? It's at least a two-order-of-magnitude difference. But nobody had really been able to make a reusable rocket work. So I thought, if we can do that, then that would really be the key breakthrough for space travel.” Interview at the Computer History Museum, 2013
1:20

Elon Musk: I started reading about rockets to understand why they're so freaking expensive. “I started reading quite a bit about rockets to try to understand why they're so freaking expensive. Where does the $60 million go for the Delta II? Now Delta II, I think, is $100 million or something, some crazy number. And Delta II is a relatively small rocket. If you go to one of the bigger rockets, it's anywhere from $200 to $400 million. Anyway, so I came to the conclusion that there wasn't really a good reason for rockets to be so expensive, and that they could be a lot less. Even in an expendable format, they could be less. And that if one could make them reusable, like airplanes, then the cost of rocketry would drop dramatically, the cost of space travel would drop dramatically. Because the cost of the fuel was maybe anywhere from 0.2% to 0.5% of the cost of the rocket. It's like a plane. How much is the cost of the fuel in the plane versus the plane itself? It's at least a two-order-of-magnitude difference. But nobody had really been able to make a reusable rocket work. So I thought, if we can do that, then that would really be the key breakthrough for space travel.” Interview at the Computer History Museum, 2013

ELON CLIPS

1,208,989 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

$RKLB Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck on the mindset behind competing with SpaceX and Blue Origin: "My two competitors in this industry are Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. So I'm not going to outspend those people. We have to out-innovate them. That's the only way that we can be successful. And that's why we've been successful to date." "If you stand still, you just get run over. You have to be on the steamroller, not in front of the steamroller." Brilliant CEO.
0:27

$RKLB Rocket Lab CEO Peter Beck on the mindset behind competing with SpaceX and Blue Origin: "My two competitors in this industry are Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos. So I'm not going to outspend those people. We have to out-innovate them. That's the only way that we can be successful. And that's why we've been successful to date." "If you stand still, you just get run over. You have to be on the steamroller, not in front of the steamroller." Brilliant CEO.

ValueOverPrice

31,232 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 NOW: President Trump takes huge VICTORY LAP on the success of Space Force — which some Democrats MOCKED Space Force is now vastly improving the accuracy of our weapons on the ground. And we're leading China and Russia, easily 🔥 "I'm very proud of the Space Force because that was a branch that a new one that came up, and we were losing to Russia and to China in space." "Space Force is now leading the other countries, China, Russia, and there is no fourth, really, and leading them by, we saw numbers the other day, leading, we're leading in space by so much it's, we're never going to be caught. So I'm very proud of Space Force!" "I think it's going to be one of our most important as time goes by. A lot of the things that you see, a lot of the accuracy of the weapons is caused because of what we created with Space Force, so we're very proud of that."
1:05

🚨 NOW: President Trump takes huge VICTORY LAP on the success of Space Force — which some Democrats MOCKED Space Force is now vastly improving the accuracy of our weapons on the ground. And we're leading China and Russia, easily 🔥 "I'm very proud of the Space Force because that was a branch that a new one that came up, and we were losing to Russia and to China in space." "Space Force is now leading the other countries, China, Russia, and there is no fourth, really, and leading them by, we saw numbers the other day, leading, we're leading in space by so much it's, we're never going to be caught. So I'm very proud of Space Force!" "I think it's going to be one of our most important as time goes by. A lot of the things that you see, a lot of the accuracy of the weapons is caused because of what we created with Space Force, so we're very proud of that."

Eric Daugherty

15,034 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."
1:00

"What is P vs NP and how does it relate to human knowledge?" Avi Wigderson (Turing Award & Abel Prize winner): "In a very basic way, all the problems we want to solve are really NP problems. A subset of it is the problems we can solve. So the question of P versus NP is whether we can solve all the problems we want to solve, whether we can know everything we want to know. This is basically about the limits of our knowledge. You can think there is no limit to what we may want to know but I claim that essentially in any human endeavor, what people are searching for have the property that when a solution is found, it is easily recognized. NP are all problems that we can honestly say we really want to solve and P are those that we can solve. Whether they are equal is just the very fact that a solution can be easily recognized would imply that it can be efficiently found. That means that we can know everything we ever want to know, it's a fundamental question about human knowledge."

Ryan Peterman

20,069 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

No one swindles #America out of more money than #Israel If we want to make America great again we have to get rid of the leaches sucking us dry. I'm optimistic because I never thought we would be having this conversation. Now that we all know what the problems are, we can address them. #Goodluck to you all #LongLiveTheRepublic
4:30

No one swindles #America out of more money than #Israel If we want to make America great again we have to get rid of the leaches sucking us dry. I'm optimistic because I never thought we would be having this conversation. Now that we all know what the problems are, we can address them. #Goodluck to you all #LongLiveTheRepublic

The Artist known as Jess

61,395 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

Russian State Duma MP Gurulev on the critical state of Russia’s budget and emergency housing: "Today, the budget simply can’t cope. We have a massive budget deficit. They say everything is fine, that revenues are strong. But just look at the size of the deficit. It becomes absolutely clear that there is simply not enough money. The federal emergency housing program has been suspended since the start of the so-called 'special military operation.' So to say that we will solve the emergency housing problem tomorrow would be untrue. Until we can breathe a little after the 'special military operation,' until some money appears, we won’t solve this problem at all. I’m telling you how things really are."
0:52

Russian State Duma MP Gurulev on the critical state of Russia’s budget and emergency housing: "Today, the budget simply can’t cope. We have a massive budget deficit. They say everything is fine, that revenues are strong. But just look at the size of the deficit. It becomes absolutely clear that there is simply not enough money. The federal emergency housing program has been suspended since the start of the so-called 'special military operation.' So to say that we will solve the emergency housing problem tomorrow would be untrue. Until we can breathe a little after the 'special military operation,' until some money appears, we won’t solve this problem at all. I’m telling you how things really are."

Anton Gerashchenko

134,547 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

How a single, obvious question led Elon Musk to create SpaceX and changed space travel forever: “I came to the conclusion that there wasn’t really a good reason for rockets to be so expensive, and that they could be a lot less Even in an expendable format they could be less" From day one, Elon's mission has been crystal clear: make rockets fully reusable, just like commercial airplanes "The cost of space travel would drop dramatically, because the cost of the fuel was maybe anywhere from 0.2 to 0.5 percent of the cost of the rocket But nobody had really been able to make a reusable rocket work. So I thought, ‘Okay, if we can do that, then that would really be the key breakthrough for space travel’”
0:53

How a single, obvious question led Elon Musk to create SpaceX and changed space travel forever: “I came to the conclusion that there wasn’t really a good reason for rockets to be so expensive, and that they could be a lot less Even in an expendable format they could be less" From day one, Elon's mission has been crystal clear: make rockets fully reusable, just like commercial airplanes "The cost of space travel would drop dramatically, because the cost of the fuel was maybe anywhere from 0.2 to 0.5 percent of the cost of the rocket But nobody had really been able to make a reusable rocket work. So I thought, ‘Okay, if we can do that, then that would really be the key breakthrough for space travel’”

X Freeze

14,066 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

The reason why Elon Musk started working on reusable rockets "I started reading quite a bit about rockets to try and understand why they're so freaking expensive If one could make them reusable like airplanes, then the cost of rocketry would drop dramatically The cost of the fuel was maybe anywhere from 0.2% to 0.5% of the cost of the rocket I came to the conclusion that there wasn't really a good reason for rockets to be so expensive and that they could be a lot less even in an expendable format "Nobody had really been able to make a reusable rocket work... but if we can do that, then that would really be the key breakthrough" - Elon Musk
1:20

The reason why Elon Musk started working on reusable rockets "I started reading quite a bit about rockets to try and understand why they're so freaking expensive If one could make them reusable like airplanes, then the cost of rocketry would drop dramatically The cost of the fuel was maybe anywhere from 0.2% to 0.5% of the cost of the rocket I came to the conclusion that there wasn't really a good reason for rockets to be so expensive and that they could be a lot less even in an expendable format "Nobody had really been able to make a reusable rocket work... but if we can do that, then that would really be the key breakthrough" - Elon Musk

X Freeze

458,307 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

French economist Thomas Piketty to Zack Polanski, "If we don't manage to articulate together a model of development, a model of energy production, a model of dematerialization of the economy, reduction in working time, which makes all of this aspiration compatible with planetary habitability, we are all going to suffer a lot." "We are all going to have three, four degrees or more in global warming." "And I can tell you the kind of heat wave we had, two weeks ago. It's going to look almost nothing at all as compared to what we'll have in a few decades." "So the challenge of the future is to try to have the kind of social and democratic and fiscal transformations that we had in the 20th century at the national level, to have it at a broader level." "Because the problem we have to solve, are global."
1:05

French economist Thomas Piketty to Zack Polanski, "If we don't manage to articulate together a model of development, a model of energy production, a model of dematerialization of the economy, reduction in working time, which makes all of this aspiration compatible with planetary habitability, we are all going to suffer a lot." "We are all going to have three, four degrees or more in global warming." "And I can tell you the kind of heat wave we had, two weeks ago. It's going to look almost nothing at all as compared to what we'll have in a few decades." "So the challenge of the future is to try to have the kind of social and democratic and fiscal transformations that we had in the 20th century at the national level, to have it at a broader level." "Because the problem we have to solve, are global."

Farrukh

21,190 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Elon Musk: Starship is next-level. It's the first rocket that can take us to Mars. “Starship is the most complex and advanced rocket that's ever been made by, I don't know, an order of magnitude or something like that. It's a lot. It's really next-level. The fundamental optimization of Starship is minimizing cost per ton to orbit and ultimately cost per ton to the surface of Mars. This may seem like a mercantile objective, but it is actually the thing that needs to be optimized. There is a certain cost per ton to the surface of Mars where we can afford to establish a self-sustaining city, and then above that we cannot afford to do it. Right now, you couldn't fly to Mars for a trillion dollars. No amount of money could get you a ticket to Mars. So, we need to get that to something that is actually possible at all.” From: Interview with Lex Fridman, December 28, 2021
0:53

Elon Musk: Starship is next-level. It's the first rocket that can take us to Mars. “Starship is the most complex and advanced rocket that's ever been made by, I don't know, an order of magnitude or something like that. It's a lot. It's really next-level. The fundamental optimization of Starship is minimizing cost per ton to orbit and ultimately cost per ton to the surface of Mars. This may seem like a mercantile objective, but it is actually the thing that needs to be optimized. There is a certain cost per ton to the surface of Mars where we can afford to establish a self-sustaining city, and then above that we cannot afford to do it. Right now, you couldn't fly to Mars for a trillion dollars. No amount of money could get you a ticket to Mars. So, we need to get that to something that is actually possible at all.” From: Interview with Lex Fridman, December 28, 2021

ELON CLIPS

1,190,697 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr