.Stephen Miller: "It's certainly our view as an administration that it is untenable for individual district court judges to try to assert control over the functioning of the entire executive branch. This is not found anywhere in the Constitution. It's inconsistent with any notion of democracy, and it's inconsistent... with the notion that we are a country that settles big policy disputes by holding national elections. We're going to vigorously protect the prerogative of the President to change federal policy and, in most of these cases, to assert control over the federal bureaucracy. The central issue here is whether policy decisions are made by the President or by unelected career bureaucrats."show more

@StephenM Good stuff.

Do you support President Trump's executive order creating DOGE, the Department of Government Efficiency?

@StephenM AOC: "Biden should ignore judges." (2023)

The Creating Schedule F in the Excepted Service Act (H.R. 5346) is a direct strike against unelected bureaucrats hijacking policy. Section 3 reclassifies key positions under Schedule F, stripping civil service protections for careerists who defy accountability. Trump’s vision: “Policy decisions are made by the President, not unelected career bureaucrats.” The bill’s findings (Section 2) expose how 75% of federal supervisors can’t even remove poor performers—Schedule F fixes that. Opponents claim it’s unconstitutional, but the Constitution doesn’t empower judges to control the executive branch. This is about restoring accountability, not undermining democracy. Bureaucrats torch your cash, then call for fiscal responsibility. The joke never ends.

@StephenM According to the unconstitutionality score by @DOGE, for every law/rule made by elected officials there are an astounding 18.5 rules made by unelected bureaucrats ‼️‼️‼️‼️

@StephenM Based! Imagine low level judges trying to rule over the POTUS! Lock them up for treason. I am done watching the Democrat activists abuse the will of We The People!

@StephenM Now do Article 1 Section 8. Congress only has a small fraction of the power they have been exercising. Plenary tax & spend? UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

That would be a great argument if the executive branch actually represented the will of the people. But it doesn’t. Presidents don’t govern alone. They rely on the same unelected bureaucrats, corporate lobbyists, and career politicians who have been making decisions for decades regardless of who wins elections. The idea that a single election gives a president full control over federal policy ignores how deeply entrenched the system is. The real issue isn’t whether judges should check the president. It’s that both parties weaponize the courts, bureaucracy, and executive power when it benefits them and cry foul when it doesn’t. This isn’t about democracy. It’s about control.

@StephenM 🎯🎯🫡🫡

@StephenM More talk? Or will we actually change something so these judges don't rule the country?

@StephenM When will the Supreme Court cite the Article II powers of the President?