Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Still thinking about #Varanasi’s footage presentation event: how HUGE & celebratory the introductions for #PriyankaChopraJonas & #MaheshBabu𓃵 (Jai Babu!!!) were. Dancers, fireworks, confetti. ❤️🎥 #SSRajamouli @urstrulymahesh PRIYANKA mmkeeravaani Showing Business rajamouli ss

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Liberal Leadership OR Labor Sworn in? - The #ABC had a choice, what did they do? 🎥 What you’re about to see is real. It’s taken directly from the ABC’s own YouTube channel — as shown in the clip below. No edits to change the story, just a spotlight on how the stories were told. From start to finish, this segment ran 3 minutes and 33 seconds. And here’s how they used that time: 88.7% was spent on the Liberal leadership circus Just 6.1% covered the Labor Government’s official swearing-in — a historic event And the rest — 5.2% — was neutral filler or transitions That’s 3 minutes and 9 seconds hyping up internal Liberal drama, vs 13 seconds acknowledging the formation of a new government. This wasn’t journalism. It was narrative. And it was bias. Pure and simple. To spare you the boredom of the full Liberal worship session, we’ve sped up their airtime, and played Labor’s 13 seconds at normal speed — to drive home the imbalance. But here's the kicker — even those calling out the lopsided timing missed this: 👉 While the ABC is talking about Liberal leadership drama, they visually overlay footage from the Labor swearing-in ceremony. They visually bury Labor’s history-making moment under a Liberal voiceover dialogue. Ask yourself: Why? This tactic — talking about the Liberals while showing Labor — is a trick straight out of the Sky News playbook. They did it before the election. They’re still doing it now. 📺 Watch closely. 📊 Look at the graphs. 🧠 Then ask: When is the ABC going to admit it’s joined at the hip with Murdoch media? This is not public broadcasting. It’s propaganda. And it’s fkng disgraceful. The full ABC clip remains live on their official YouTube channel — at the link visible in our footage. (We’re not typing it here for obvious reasons). Check it before they delete it.

The Noisy Elephant

50,423 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: ChudtheBuilder does not make bond in Montgomery County. Here are the highlights: - Alex Rosen (Alex Rosen) offered to put up $100,000 for the bond. He was on the witness stand and showed bank statements showing how much money he had in his savings and that he doesn’t have an actual business account, just a personal account from his social media ventures. - DA presented details of what transpired outside the courtroom that day of the shooting. It lines up with what I was informed about in those details of that day in previous posts. Sounded like the stream will eventually be in their possession. - Discussions arise about Duel as a credible source of money as they are trying to wire $1,000,000 to insure LA Bonding in the event Dalton was released and doesn’t show up in court. Judge ruled it as insufficient as gamblings funds are not legal in Tennessee, especially from a foreign entity. - Judge keeps bond as $1,000,000 and bonding companies can only bond up to an amount of $100,000 per company, which means Dalton would need 10 bonding companies to bond. - Even if Alex Rosen forks over $500,000, Dalton would still need 5 bonding companies ($500,000) to bond. - Dalton’s F-250 had the internal system (they called it a black box) extracted and downloaded for evidence. They will install it back in and after an itemized list is submitted of what Dalton had in the truck and what hasn’t already been seized for evidence, he can get those items back. F-250 can be returned back once the county investigators are done. - Seems there were some issues in the Nashville hearing per Dalton’s attorney. I will try to find more information on that. This clip is from the livestream from WSMV 4 Nashville

Chris Unleashed

1,789,833 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

HYBE and Min Hee-jin NewJeans Controversy from the Perspective of a 20-Year Entertainment Industry Expert | Kim Yoon-ji, Senior Researcher at the Overseas Economic Research Institute of the Export-Import Bank of Korea #1 [Investment Insight] 증시각도기TV HYBE has shown a somewhat immature side throughout this process. The essence of the issue has become less important. Hello, viewers and investors of Stock TV. Recently, there has been a lot of societal concern about the entertainment industry. Last year, it did well, but the question remains about how it will fare this year. We’re joined by Kim Yoon-ji, Senior Researcher at the Korea Eximbank Overseas Economic Research Institute, to discuss this. Welcome. Today, I brought a drink because this topic is not easy to discuss soberly. The situation between HYBE, Min Hee-jin, and NewJeans has escalated, and unfortunately, it’s no longer just management fighting but the artists have joined the fray. I’ve heard from someone in the industry that the close relationship between a producer and an artist is inevitable. In the past, there have been similar cases where producers and artists were tightly knit. Now, something similar has happened with Min Hee-jin and HYBE. Most people outside the industry don’t know the exact terms of the contract between Min Hee-jin and HYBE. As my own son works in the entertainment field, I’m well aware of how important it is to work with a good producer. For a company like HYBE, which has invested tens or even hundreds of billions of won, it’s unthinkable that they would allow NewJeans to separate and go independent after establishing their position. Many in the industry agree that this doesn’t make sense. To the general public, NewJeans might seem like the underdogs, and people might feel they should be allowed to leave. But from the perspective of the entertainment industry, which requires substantial capital to grow, the relationship between investors and artists is key. You can’t discuss this industry without acknowledging the role of investors. This case is different from situations where individual members leave, as seen in the past with groups that had Chinese members. This isn’t about a single member leaving; it’s more about the fact that, in this industry, the producers are as important as the artists themselves. From the beginning, NewJeans has been marketed as Min Hee-jin’s girl group, so the idea of them continuing without her feels different. We need to approach this from a different angle. That said, it doesn’t mean HYBE should completely cut ties. Many people have different initial thoughts about the situation, but the core issue here is the importance of the relationship between producers and the company, especially when substantial investment is involved. From my perspective, the fundamental question is: what exactly was attempted? I still find this unclear. In any company, it's common to hear people say, "I want to quit, I can't work with this boss, I'm leaving tomorrow." We all talk about this with friends or colleagues. Sometimes, we even ask others to let us know if there’s a good opportunity elsewhere. But actually submitting a resignation is a whole different issue. But in the new premise, I still wonder what exactly they were trying to do. What exactly was attempted? We always talk about it at work, right? "I'm going to quit. I can't work with that boss anymore. I'm leaving tomorrow." We always have those conversations. We talk about it with our friends, with team members, and even ask friends outside of work to let us know if they hear of any good positions. But actually submitting a resignation is a whole different issue, isn't it? Looking at how the situation first unfolded, it seems like HYBE was the one to bring things to light. They shared a lot with the press, and Min Hee-jin, the CEO, responded with a strong counterstatement. HYBE was saying, "Min Hee-jin is trying to do this and that," but CEO Min was like, "What else have I done apart from that message on KakaoTalk?" The court also judged that they weren't sure what actions had actually been attempted. To me, this seems like the fact of the matter. Clearly, HYBE's relationship with CEO Min Hee-jin might not be good. There could have been friction about how a subsidiary operates so independently from the parent company. There were likely various issues internally, but they should have been resolved within the company without making the problems visible externally. The fact that they let it spill outside before resolving it was a huge mistake on HYBE's part, revealing weaknesses in their management abilities. In my view, this has greatly devalued HYBE, becoming a powerful force that has dragged down their valuation. Throughout this process, HYBE displayed a level of immaturity, and the core of the issue became less important. The real concern for investors now is whether the company can effectively handle issues like these. Once this problem is resolved, can the remaining HYBE groups continue to grow securely? This business is all about reputation. HYBE is now seen as a company that ousts female CEOs simply because she didn't follow their orders. That perception leaves a lasting impression on people's minds, damaging the company's future operations. From an investor's perspective, two major incidents have happened in quick succession. The first was the boost in value during 2020 when HYBE sold a huge number of albums during COVID-19, creating the sense that the entertainment industry was Korea's next big sector. But then, this recent issue with Min Hee-jin, alongside BLACKPINK's contract situation, has put a serious damper on things. BLACKPINK didn't renew their contract as a group, and though they claim to continue working together in some capacity, it's not the same as before. YG Entertainment's profitability has plummeted, revealing how dependent they were on BLACKPINK. This has left investors wondering whether the entertainment business is just a limited-time, seven-year affair. If BLACKPINK had carried on smoothly into the next generation, it would have seemed like a sustainable business, and investors would have continued to trust in the long-term future of Korean entertainment. But now, we're seeing the cracks in that perception. It’s become a question of how to invest in a business with a lifespan of only seven years, when even the manufacturing industry lasts longer than that. The BLACKPINK incident and the NewJeans situation have both severely harmed investor confidence. HYBE's struggles with its artists are analogous to a manufacturing company facing a revolt from its workers. When investors look at this instability, they start questioning whether the business is even viable. The concept of sustainability has been seriously undermined, and the fact that the seven-year contract issue has been a long-standing concern doesn’t make it any easier to deal with. What used to reassure investors was the belief that when a seven-year contract ended, the company would already have the next seven years planned out, ready to sustain their business. That faith in the big entertainment companies has been shaken. Achieving the kind of success that BTS or BLACKPINK did is incredibly difficult, and passing the baton to the next generation is no simple task. Even though investors had faith that YG would produce another BLACKPINK-level group, now that trust is faltering. However, I do think people are now looking at contracts a bit differently. In the past, when a group disbanded, the members would scatter. But now, groups like BLACKPINK continue to work together even while pursuing solo projects. This shows that they understand the importance of sticking together, and I thought that this might help extend the longevity of these groups. But in reality, very few cases of disbanded groups have seen much success with individual members pursuing separate careers. There aren’t many examples where groups have stayed active for long, especially when individual members run into personal issues. Take Big Bang, for instance—they’ve been around for a while, but their personal scandals have made it hard for the group to recover fully. In the entertainment business, it’s rare for groups to last more than seven years, and age is also a factor. Once a group surpasses the seven-year mark, the members tend to be quite a bit older. With BTS, they need to show a fresh side if they’re to keep running strong. One of the most disheartening things mentioned by the members was that they didn’t feel respected. This ties into a larger issue in our society, as we're seeing with the national discussion around workplace bullying. If we think about how BTS achieved success, it's clear why this is such a serious issue. Back when BTS rose to fame, they shared how they weren’t from one of the top three agencies and positioned themselves as underdogs who worked hard to gain recognition. This resonated with many young people who felt that if you work hard enough, you can succeed, even without the backing of a major company. This message gave hope to many, not only in Korea but also globally. BTS’s fan base, especially in the U.S., includes many people who identify as outsiders, those who don’t feel they belong to the mainstream—whether in terms of race, culture, or social standing. For them, BTS was a source of inspiration, showing that you can still succeed even if you start from the margins. With NewJeans, though there’s talk about Min Hee-jin, the allegations of bullying within the company are hitting a sensitive nerve for fans. It’s unfortunate that the company allowed things to reach a point where such accusations were made. Even if the situation was mostly an internal conflict among the adults in charge, they should have handled it better to avoid involving the artists. In the past, we've seen similar issues, like with Big Bang’s various scandals, which were almost at the level of criminal activity. The current situation with NewJeans might not be as severe, but bullying and exclusion are still serious concerns. Ultimately, experiences like these can serve as valuable lessons for the entertainment industry. This situation has highlighted that the entertainment business is fundamentally about human relationships. From the artists to the products they create, everything revolves around people. The moment someone’s feelings are hurt or relationships are damaged, the entire business can collapse. The entertainment business is all about personal connections, something I've always believed. Recently, I heard about Naver Webtoon’s global success, and it's fascinating to think about how it has outgrown Kakao Webtoon, despite being a later player. Many factors contributed to this success, but someone mentioned that webtoons are also a "personal connection" business. Webtoon creators are tough to manage—they're artists, after all, and keeping them on schedule, especially with weekly deadlines, is a challenging task. CEO Kim Joong has managed to nurture relationships with these creators, making personal connections the backbone of the business. In the entertainment industry, particularly with idols, you can't overlook the importance of personal relationships. The key skill for managing this industry is the ability to connect deeply with both the creators and the artists. HYBE, for instance, doesn’t just need skilled managers who are good with finance or operations. What they truly need are people who can foster those personal relationships, especially when they’re dealing with artists as young as 13 or 15. It’s about ensuring that these young talents feel understood and cared for, so they can be inspired to do their best work. Managing young artists is tricky because their idea of success might be completely different from what adults think. A 13-year-old might not care about owning multiple houses—they might just want to spend time with their family or have the freedom to eat out whenever they want. The manager’s job is to tap into what motivates them and help them thrive in a way that’s meaningful to them. This kind of nurturing is not easy to scale. When a company grows too big, it’s challenging to maintain those close relationships. That's why multi-label approaches, like those seen in large entertainment agencies, are supposed to help. But if personal connections within those labels break down, the whole system can fall apart. This business model seems uniquely suited to Korea. It’s hard to imagine it working the same way in Japan, where there's a more hierarchical, command-driven structure. Japan's entertainment industry often depends on strong, central producers who direct everything. In contrast, Korean idols often rise through collective effort and personal connection, like BTS did. Despite the challenges, I believe Korea’s entertainment sector has room for long-term growth. Many of today’s youth are drawn to this field because it allows them to express their talents and passions. If scandals like the one with NewJeans continue to arise, however, it might dissuade some young people from pursuing these dreams. When you look at what NewJeans members have said, there’s not much to disagree with. They simply want to keep doing what they’ve always done and follow their own creative paths. Ensuring they have the freedom to do so can lead to even greater success. These days, if you ask middle or elementary school students what they want to be when they grow up, many of them will say they want to become idols or YouTubers. They believe that with enough effort, they can make it. The entertainment industry needs to be able to channel that passion and potential into something positive. If Min Hee-jin were to leave HYBE, it’s clear that many companies would be eager to work with her. She mentioned once that “everyone is crazy about money,” and I think that’s why there would be a long line of people wanting to meet with her if she decided to move on. Right now, for example, there are people in the entertainment industry, like CJ, who may not have fully established themselves, or even private investors, just waiting for an opportunity. Many of them are keeping an eye on Min Hee-jin leaving HYBE. This was evident during the recent Tokyo performance, where her creativity was on full display. It was incomparable. That’s why this situation is even more unfortunate. Some people say, "If it wasn’t for the money, how could that group have been created?" But I believe there are people who could have made it happen with or without money. That’s the crucial difference in this case. While I'm not an expert, I was touched by the process of recreating a hit song from a legendary Japanese female singer from the '80s. It felt like a major event. It was amazing because I had never seen anything like it before. Even though I wasn’t familiar with the original song, just seeing it was enough to draw in so much attention and make it feel like a historic moment. That’s what talent is—turning something simple, like a cover song, into a major event. I remember thinking, "How do the Japanese people feel about this?" because the crowd's reaction was incredible. The enthusiasm was surprising, and I wondered what they were thinking while watching it. This is the true power of Korean culture—it’s not just about promoting our own culture but also deeply resonating with others. The entertainment industry’s core business is making audiences happy and even obsessed. Min Hee-jin is undeniably a top-tier artist in this field. If she were to leave HYBE, there would be countless opportunities for her. But if HYBE mishandles this situation, it won’t just be about losing one person—it could destabilize everything. They really need to handle this carefully. As for stocks and investments, that's up to everyone’s individual decisions. We're just having a casual chat here about the entertainment industry. As someone with a child in the business and another who's analyzed the industry, we’re just relaxing with a casual discussion. So, let’s pour a drink and enjoy this conversation. Watch the full video:

1tokki

104,638 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🌅 Designing Systems for Trust in the Digital Economy: A Hedera Builder Showcase We just went live with Impart Global and Mingo, and the conversation stayed focused on two things that are usually ignored: trust and usability. Impart Global is building a non-custodial token launch platform on Hedera. They were careful with their language, and for good reason. They are not claiming to eliminate bad behavior entirely. What they are doing is designing systems that make common failure modes harder to exploit. They kept returning to the same three issues that have damaged token launches for years: founders pulling liquidity, early participants gaining unfair entry and exiting immediately, and coordinated behavior that turns launches into short-lived trading games instead of long-term projects. Tyler, the lead developer, made an important point. If a company actually wants to issue a token tied to a real product or business, it cannot do that on infrastructure designed for disorder. He noted that Hedera’s fair ordering directly affects how markets behave. MINGO approached the problem from a different angle: everyday users. They demonstrated a ticketing platform that works the way people already expect software to work. You sign in with an email. You buy a ticket. You attend an event. There is no requirement to understand wallets, keys, or blockchain concepts. At the same time, the system still enforces verification, prevents fraud, and controls resale. The blockchain does its job quietly in the background instead of demanding attention. What connected both sides of the discussion was a shared understanding that adoption does not come from teaching people new behaviors. It comes from removing friction. Impart’s longer-term vision is to support creators and businesses with tools that hold up under real use. Mingo is building an access layer that connects people to events and experiences without unnecessary complexity. This is how ecosystems grow without noise. Builders focus on design choices that reduce abuse, protect users, and scale without breaking. Not everything here will succeed. That is normal. But the direction is clear. Less spectacle. More structure. Software that works for people who are not thinking about crypto at all. Hosted by Tate

Generation Infinity

105,124 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Timeline - Get something to drink. Lord Farmer started funding Brexit in 2016. Farage and him work together on pushing it through. Also George starts heavily working with Farage sometime in 2017. Candace met Farage in 2017 or 2018 at CPAC. Her memory varies on who she’s talking to. April 2018 Candace spent a wonderful evening with Farage. I bet she did. Was George with him? Was this where the meetings first started about the alliance? George and Candace magically meet by chance in December of 2018. She had never heard of George before? Really Candace? George had never been brought up to you for months? Even though he was working with Farage closely and funding him? Mappin who is also great friends with Farage is texting Charlie and Candace about coming many times about coming over. And how Russia/China and the US should work together. We’ve already discussed the multipolar theory of Dugin and how he’s involved. Screen shot below. Candace then makes them plane reservations without Charlies knowledge to get them over to the UK. They go and the alliance is started. When George came over to spend 3 days Farage came too. And says he played Cupid? First time I found Farage came with George. First time I’ve seen them admit Farage was behind them meeting. They get engaged right after and George moves in with her. They were sealing the plan. Get married and get support in the US politics. She had Trump meet him March of 2019. George then takes over TPUK in 2/19 thinking he’s going to be Charlie Kirk of the UK. At this time he’s also running for a Brexit seat. Which he doesn’t get. Charlie found out about the sham and fired him in April of 2019 and Candace a few weeks after. I think it was a few weeks later because he had to tell the major donors he was letting her go before he did and had to have time to explain to them why. The video here where she says Charlie lied to her about a donor meeting….i don’t think it was a donor meeting. I think it was Charlie meeting with the big donors letting them know he was letting her go. This meeting was just days before they split. Here’s also a text from Mappin and Charlie in 2019 about the far right trying to take out TPUsa. I think he’s talking about Nick but who knows. Could he be talking about her alliances? He screen shot them? Why? Probably to send to Candace and others. But Charlie also knew Candace was huge in the conservative movement and to split publicly would mean a split in the 2020 elections. Then she wasn’t invited to Charlie’s wedding. During this time they remained cordial and she was still useful to the movement. Hence DW and PragerU picking her up. Then DW fires her. Now we know why the break. Jeremy and Ben found out she was working with Nick and others that were anti Israel. Charlie also finds out about the Nick alliance. Charlie had been fighting Nick from infiltrating and trying to take down TPUsa for years. That was when communications were completely shut off. Candace unfollows Charlie in May of 2024. But she’s already scheduled for the young women’s summit in June. That had to be awkward. And Charlie promoted it because well it was a TPUsa event. Them comes Candace’s attack on the Macrons. It wasn’t because she thought Brigette a man. It was to embarrass them on the world stage. Macron is Zs biggest supporter. They want him out for many reasons. And for her attacks now on France. Up until August of 2025 the Dugin/Mappin/Candace/Alex/Tucker alliance was saying Trump was the next messiah on X. That he was going to help Russia and sign onto their plans. After the meeting when Trump didn’t go for it and canceled the next meeting all the people in the alliances posts turned on Trump. He was now public enemy #1. Then Charlie was murdered. Part 2 tomorrow.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

16,834 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Does the Hellfire Object Operate Like a "Marsupial"? Corbell: There's 5+ more minutes of footage after the Hellfire hit the object. On today's WEAPONIZED, Jeremy Kenyon Lockyer Corbell said the folks he spoke to said the Hellfire missile "bounced off" the UAP, or whatever that object was. I just don't see that. Deflected at the last minute? Changed direction once it lost the laser tracking? Both can be debated. But bounced? IMO (and the opinion of some of the folks who did their own analysis, which I share shared on here), no. Also, he said it was labeled UAP by the DOD and still is. By whom? I would never ask him for names. How many folks? What type of folks? Is it the same folks who claim it "bounced off" the object? Corbell added that the UAP/object, "didn't descend. Neither did the tagalongs. They did not descend after, for a large amount of time." Here's James Fowler from yesterday's interview with ProPixel Video Analysis and Research. Fowler: "I think it's important to note that post-impact, the target did descend. You know, if the crosshairs were left in the same spot, as in the system operators letting it drift off screen so they can see it not occluded by the crosshairs... You'll see the object and the other objects that were ejected from it. You'll see it in a descent, initially. It does look like it levels out later on in the flight. "The three items that were ejected from the target are very interesting. That's actually what brought me and Billy together on this topic was, Billy was doing some analysis on the video and zoomed and enhanced, and I said, 'Oh my God, I've seen those shapes somewhere before. We should talk about this.' "So, before that, I was like, 'Ah, it's something prosaic, maybe it's something natural, you know, something, you know, it's a balloon. Who knows? Maybe some new technology.' But these three items are very interesting, not just the way they're moving, but the way they're shaped and how they present." Corbell said AARO can go and get the other 5+ minutes of footage. It's on SIPRNET. ~~~ Corbell: "One of the weirdest things is when it was reported to me and George Knapp, there was this word that was attached to it within the file and a briefing. And it was marsupial. So I had to go look that up. And it turns out, when you look it up, marsupials [are] things that like, keep other living things in pouches, right? And so it was so funny to me, and I didn't know what to make of it for months and months and months. "But then I started thinking, this really is reminiscent of a good friend of mine, his footage, this guy named Jim Martin. And he was filming in ultraviolet and IR through a camera off the coast of California. And there's this weird, anamorphous blob that it's dropping out these orbs. I'm mean, just dropping these orbs out. "I'll play this here just as like a sort of symbolic, um, why they might use the word marsupial. Think of like, a kangaroo with a pouch and objects inside of it. So that's why I said online, I think you're on to something, Marik vR. Now I can't prove that, but I'm reporting to you what came to me and George, associated with this footage prior to its public release. So that's something of note. "There have been so many weird, dismissive theories of this without proper investigation. I think it was even Avi Loeb was suggesting that the object itself that got hit was a Houthi Samad drone. Have you ever seen a photo of one of these? They're not an anamorphous blob. And you know, because your thermal research Marik, you would see the huge wings, the X on the tail, the long length of this if it was hitting some known drone. So what you're seeing is representative of the shape of what's there. "So there's a lot of questions with this footage. This will be an ongoing thing. But I can tell you that even as of today, it is a UAP designated by the DOD, to this day, even after the footage came out. If that changes, if we find out about it, George and I will report that."

Joe Murgia

28,107 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

New's Full Interview with Vogue: #Newwiee #VogueTHJune2026 #PrideMonth 🐻‍❄Hello Vogue Thailand.. This is New thitipoom 💬The boy's love phenomenon 🐻‍❄Ever since I was young — well, actually, ever since I first started working — I think I've always taken every opportunity that came my way. If an opportunity was given to me, I'd do it no matter what it was. At that time, it was kind of a transitional period.Before that, I worked as an MC. Then, as things shifted toward digital broadcasting, the company also changed its focus toward producing series. By chance, I ended up appearing in one of those series. Back then, I played a friend's friend — a role that was almost like an extra. My part in the script was really small. The only thing written about the character was: "These two are secretly dating." That was literally the entire setting. But when the show aired, it unexpectedly became a huge hit. After seeing that, P'Tha created a separate story just for us (For tay and new). So if you ask whether that was the moment I decided on this path... I did decide that I wanted to continue acting and doing projects. But I never thought, "Oh, this is BL, should I do it?". I didn't really have that kind of concern. At the time, I was taking on every kind of role and every kind of job that came to me, without limiting the possibilities. 💬Life after boy's love series 🐻‍❄In terms of work? I think it's closer to the quantity of projects and activities I've done. It's about being able to say, 'Oh, I've tried this kind of work too,' and continuously building up experience. By taking one step forward at a time like that, new experiences will naturally keep filling in along the way. Right now, I feel like I'm still only at one point in the journey. There are still far more things I haven't tried and areas I haven't challenged myself in yet. It's not that I have some grand ambition or huge goal. It's more about practical thoughts like: 'How can I manage my time more efficiently in the future?' 'Oh, I'm going to have to do this and that next, so I should prepare in advance.' It's closer to that kind of thinking. 💬What equality issues need more attention in thailand ? 🐻‍❄ One thing I've realized while working in the entertainment industry is this: People often talk about the image of the entertainment industry. At the end of the day, it is an entertainment business, but I think it can also be compared to a brand. If a brand chooses us as PR representatives or brand presenters, it's because they want us to represent and promote that brand. However, I feel that our country still doesn't make enough use of the entertainment industry to promote the nation itself. Using entertainment as a promotional tool is one of the most effective forms of PR. Even ordinary commercial brands hire actors and celebrities to advertise and represent them. But it seems that our country still doesn't pay much attention to this area. I don't understand why there isn't more effort put into developing the entertainment industry. From what I see these days, it feels like we're either standing still or progressing very slowly. When I think about it, if there were more support available... in various aspects... I'm not entirely sure where that support should come from because I haven't studied the issue in that much detail. But I do wonder why this industry develops so slowly, why it hasn't been able to grow further or make a bigger leap forward. If there were more support—whether in terms of filming locations, legal matters, or other areas...wouldn't the industry be able to develop much faster? It would attract more attention from around the world as well. And when you look at Thailand itself as a brand, I think it would become a great opportunity to introduce Thailand to a much wider audience.

Dimple ~ 🐶✈️

12,156 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

12 months ago i was surviving on tuna cans in Dubai this was the disgusting 12m² apartment I got kicked out for unpaid rent today I'm making $62K+/month from AI & live wherever I want in September 2024, i paid $4,000 to flew to Dubai for Hassan Haider's mastermind thinking I'd network for 3 days and go home what happened next was the most unhinged year of my life on day 1 I had a Closer Cartel sales interview at 12 AM Dubai time while staying at Paramount Hotel 1 AM: went to the balcony and met two men in their 40s first time I'd ever talked to actual millionaires they had yachts, showed me pictures with Real Madrid footballers, chain smoking on the top floor bars until 4 AM as a naive kid fresh out of college, i was completely enchanted by these guys they gave me the "sell me this pen" test on the spot - i remember nailing it half drunk lmao they were impressed enough to spend hours with me, showing off their lifestyle, promising rolexes, talking about making me rich after ONE conversation with these strangers, my 21-year-old brain made the most impulsive decision of my life: abandoned my entire US setup to move to Dubai permanently and join them on their venture of 'commodity trading' i thought i'd found my ticket to the top i didn't even attend a single mastermind event I paid $4,000 originally for my parents lost their fucking minds the household was in complete chaos for months thought I was getting scammed by "retarded people" I'd just met the honeymoon phase in dubai lasted exactly 14 days. then reality hit... these "mentors" were complete amateurs one was an alcoholic who'd be supportive one day, then threaten me the next would threaten me over 200 dirhams ($50) convinced me to invest my entire $4,000 net worth in commodity trading told me he had CIA connections who'd "take me down" as a 21-year-old dependent on visa sponsorship, these threats felt like death sentences a year later, still haven't seen that money back spent months trying to broker copper cathode, crude oil, gold deals worth tens of thousands thinking I'd make $50K commissions that would solve everything none of the deals ever closed just endless paperwork leading nowhere we were all inexperienced amateurs pretending to be commodity traders the survival period was insane my relationship w/ the landlord broke down when I couldn't pay rent for 2-3 weeks, i survived on 1-2 cans of tuna daily lost 22 pounds, went from 67kg to 57kg all my credit cards were over limits, all debit accounts negative, rent in dallas was overdue literally "live or die trying" mentality for 3 days couldn't even go back to my place had to go to bars and pick up different women just to have somewhere to sleep one from Iran, one from Eastern Europe, third i don't remember meanwhile i'm still trying everyday to make cash - training people at the gym, doing random gigs for anything get money in yet funnily enough despite being financially broke, i somehow maintained access to exclusive social circles would be invited to private superyachts with 7 millionaires and 30-40 Russian, Ukrainian, Swedish supermodels private mansion parties in Marina Bay the contrast i'd see on a day by day was surreal: one day surviving on tuna cans, next day in the burj khalifa at 3am at a girls place overlooking the business bay, then 4 hours later, i'm in my shoebox room the entire experience in dubai definitely taught me more lessons about life than i ever would watching a podcast or reading a book i learnt that personal energy & charisma matter more than financial status if i could access the highest social circles while being completely broke, then what can i not do? meanwhile, I was working remotely for Ticketmaster with massive timezone conflicts - getting warnings for poor performance daily. I wasn't even showing up to team meetings because I'd fuck off to random establishments to connect with people and try to make something happen if I'd been fired, would've lost my visa status and been permanently unable to return to the US was literally playing with my entire future amidst all this chaos, i did end up making one or two really good friends however the only solace i'd get once in a while was going to the Dubai Mall for hotpot, just having normal fun conversations one of them actually worked for the CIA - he'd have the coolest & most surreal stories, we would often hit the gym together and finally, the turning point came in November 2024 at 2 AM when i discovered a video about AI chatbots with nothing to lose, i built my first chatbot that night started selling basic AI services on Upwork began making real money from AI systems and kept doubling down on it around the start of this year, i returned to the US when AI work generated consistent income and since then, its been only up so yeah there was a fair amount of loneliness during that stint complete uncertainty on a day by day basis. in flight or fight mode pretty much 24/7 constantly thinking where i'm going to get my next 10 AED from but exposing myself to all of that turmoil has definitely given me an edge in business, whether it comes to negotiation, deal-making, seeing through shit, leading people, putting people in their place, etc if you're also chasing any kind of goal/ mission just remember that its never truly over it only is when you convince yourself it is you can always rise from the ashes and have an epic comeback story to tell

Aryan Mahajan

53,637 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

William and Catherine invited a friendly postman, a trusted shopkeeper and his wife, the loyal landlord of the Middletons local Bucklebury village pub and their lovely butcher to share their special wedding day. This is what they said about The Prince and Princess of Wales 🤵🏼👰🏻‍♀️ Pub landlord John Haley of the Old Boot Inn spoke of his astonishment at receiving an invitation, even though at that point he has known the Middleton family for over 14 years. “William and Kate have been to my pub about ten times in the past year. They come in, sit quietly at the table, drink wine and are a lovely couple. They’ve been in to dine and talk to the regulars naturally. They come in and relax; they mingle with other customers, not at arm's length or anything; they're just a normal couple. When [William came into the pub], it was a bit, 'Wow, it's Prince William.' But he soon put everyone at ease, and now he's been in several times. It's a great honour. I've known the family for a long time. They are a lovely, normal family, and I'm very happy for Kate.” Mr Shingadia, who runs the local shop, said: ‘We’re over the moon, absolutely thrilled. I have known Catherine for six years. “She comes in regularly. She has brought William in on about three or four occasions. The first time, having a Prince in my store was mind-blowing. He likes Viennetta ice cream, and he buys that a lot. I’ve got to know him better each time. What’s lovely about him is even though he meets many people, he still remembers my daughter’s name. Meera is only 11, but he also asks how she gets on at school. He did that genuinely, showing he cares and thinks about the people he meets. William came in a short while back when they went to a friend’s wedding in Gloucester. He asked how I was getting on and about my family, and asked how his grandma was doing The first time she brought him in, it was a total shock; we didn't recognise him immediately, but when they did the shop, she introduced him. I shook his hand, and he spoke to us for a while. You could see there was chemistry between them, and the way they looked at each other, you could see a lot of love between them. "She is charming and very approachable. She's got a natural radiance about her. A sort of presence. She's always smiling and very polite. Calm and collected. "Feeling very nervous, my wife and I get quite anxious as the time gets nearer. At the moment, there are butterflies in our stomachs." Another guest is postman Ryan Naylor, whose bag has been getting heavier by the day because of Kate’s huge fan mail. Mr Shingadia said: “Ryan came in at the beginning of the week, even though he is not our postman. He was so excited he wanted to tell us he had also been invited.” When The Mail on Sunday approached Mr Naylor on his round in the village, he declined to comment, saying only: “I deliver to the Middleton family. Kate’s a friendly, natural, lovely girl.” Local butcher said; “We're over the moon! I've got my morning suit; my wife's got her outfit; we feel it's a great privilege to be asked to attend the royal wedding. She's such a bubbly, natural, stunning girl. Together, she and William are just one piece; let's face it: they were made for each other. I'm not surprised [about locals being invited]. This is where she was born, brought up, and educated. We're a tightly-knit community; everybody knows everybody and looks out for each other. She's not forgotten where her roots are (Catherine’s roots run deep and have stayed true to herself) 🥺🥰 Anybody is brave marrying into the royal family; it's a tough job. Kate's got the will, the mind, and the strength to go alongside William, and they'll carry this through." ✨ Prince William and Catherine are authentic, grounded, and kind-hearted individuals with a strong, loving bond, surrounded by a supportive family and tight-knit community. ❤️ #PrinceWilliam #PrincessCatherine

The British Prince

52,110 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I just got back from a 5 day trip to visit San Francisco. I met 1 billionaire, 30 founders and startups execs from Google, Meta and Apple. 11 honest observations from having 50+ meetings in San Francisco this week: 1. Bryan Johnson is a hero in SF. The guy who spends $2M/year on “not dying”. I met lots of people who were on his “blueprint” and drizzling his $60 olive oil over everything. He has obtained cult-like status in SF. Literally zero people talk about Bryan where I live. 2. People are still drunk on venture capital. A buddy of mine recently moved to SF from Florida. This is a guy who runs a bootstrapped 7 figure year cash-flowing tech-enabled business. Now, all of a sudden he’s got a term sheet from a leading VC. And he’ll be on the VC treadmill. Forget dividends, pray for exit, my guy. He’ll probably take the deal too. Most founders I spoke to mentioned valuation more than profit. Most founders I spoke to name dropped VCs who they work with. It’s a status thing. Somehow VCs made it fashionable to be in the VC-backed world. Even with 2023 being a bloodshed with VC funding. It doesn’t matter. My takeaway: if you’re in SF long enough (even if you’re a bootstrapper), you’ll probably raise a round. Everyone wants to raise money and optimize that valuation. 3. Everyone is “crushing it” but not really at all. It was hard to find people who would actually tell me how things are going. Virtually everyone I spoke to told me they were “crushing it” or some version of that. The reality is being an entrepreneur is 3% crushing it and 97% being crushed (if you’re lucky). What is it about SF that makes people do this? 4. There is renewed interest in hardware. Maybe thanks to products like the Humane AI pin, Rabbit R1 etc. I met some cool 19 year old founders who are 3D printing a device and partner with creators for distribution with a 30% affiliate cute. Probably will do $2M this year. They raised $100k for some odd reason. But, I chatted with a bunch of founders interested in experimenting with hardware that would cash-flow and would be relatively asset light businesses. I expect to see more interesting low-cost ($50-$200) pieces of hardware with software subscriptions ($9-$29/month) coming up with startups who haven’t raised a ton. 5. Uber/Lyft drivers are confronting Waymo. I was at a stoplight in a regular uber with a guy 70 year old driver named Pedro. Pedro looks to his right. It’s a self-driving Waymo car. He goes: “my days are numbered. He puts his foot on the gas and tries to cutoff the Waymo and starts laughing. This human vs robot saga is probably going to get weirder. 6. It’s AI-mania. I thought just from being on X that I knew, but you really get sense for how many people are building in AI. It feels like almost everyone. 7. Most people think I’m crazy for running cash-flowing businesses. BUT there is growing intrigue about owning a portfolio of cash-flowing internet assets. It’s still fringe, but I threw an event and 600 people showed up to talk about multipreneurship. Lots of those people felt like outsiders in the land of VC. It turns out, not everyone's sold on the VC dream. 8. Very few people drink alcohol. I lived in SF from 2012-2019. Probably 10x the amount of people drinking alcohol drinking 3x the amount of alcohol. Everyone is “sober” but everyone is on some form of “organic” drug like mushrooms. 9. I asked a billionaire what his biggest regret was: His response was short and sweet: "I wish I wrote more down". You'll never remember all the ups and downs. Write it down. Got me thinking – you'll appreciate it in 5 years. Even more in 25. 10. Lots still think content creators are low status. In SF, running a unicorn is high status, creating content is still pretty low status. 11. People are going into offices. I work remote, but lots of the fast-growing startups offices I went to were packed with people and buzz. It was a vibe. Lots more observations. But these were top of mind. Love to hear what you think. I don't know if SF is “back” but it’s definitely a dose of inspiration. I had a really good time. – I share what I’m learning in real-time about startups. Follow along GREG ISENBERG.

GREG ISENBERG

456,862 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

"I will testify under oath before Congress that what I'm saying is the truth." "And he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' He pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers." ~KW (The photographic evidence I've seen thus far leaves a lot to be desired, so if more images are going to be released (as Lue Elizondo spoke about), let's hope they're clear, and conclusively show artificial structures. Ever since I first heard Wolfe tell his story (2001 at Greer's event), I felt he came across as highly credible. Unfortunately, he was killed in 2018 when he was hit by a tractor trailer as he was biking. So what did he see? Structures built by a non-human intelligence? Or, built by a previous, highly-advanced civilization on Earth? Or, from a current, human, "breakaway civilization"?) ~ Former U.S. Air Force Sergeant Karl Wolfe: "My boss came to me, I was working in a color lab at that time, I was a technician, photographic technician. I was asked to go over to this facility on Langley Air Force Base, where the NSA was bringing in the information from the lunar orbiter. And so I packed up some tools, I went over, I went into the facility. "A couple of officers took me into this hangar. This was a very large hangar. So they took me into this laboratory. I took a look at the equipment. There was an airman second class in there, I was an airman second class as well. He turned the equipment on and put it through its paces. It didn't do what it was supposed to do. I saw what was going on with it, and I said to him, 'You know, we'll have to take this thing out of the lab if we're going to work on it. We can't work on it in here in the dark-room environment.' "So, everyone left the facility, left the dark room, except this airman second class and myself. And were in, waiting for someone to come to remove this piece of equipment. And at the time, I didn't know what the real purpose of this dark room and this operation and this (laughs) facility was. I thought this was where they were bringing the data in and then releasing the images to the public. "They were doing 35 millimeter strips of film at that time, which were then assembled into 18 and a half by 11 inch mosaics, they were called. There is a digital signature and a gray scale on every 35 millimeter strip. And those strips were from successive passes around the moon. "So he was showing me how all this worked, and we walked over to one side of the lab, and he said, 'By the way, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' And I said, 'Whose (laughs)? What do you mean, whose?' He said, 'Yes, we've discovered a base on the back side of the Moon.' "And at that point, I become frightened, and was a little terrified. Thinking to myself that, if anybody walks in the room now, I know we're in jeopardy, we're in trouble, because he shouldn't be giving me this information. "And that he pulled out one of these mosaics and showed this base, which had geometric shapes, there were towers, there were spherical buildings, there were very tall towers, and things that looked somewhat like radar dishes but they were large structures. If I compare it to what I'm seeing now, because I do have photographs that have our artifacts in them that are similar to what I saw, they're massive. Some of the structures are, you know, half a mile in size. So they're huge structures. "Some of the buildings seemed to have very reflective surfaces on them. A couple of structures that I saw reminded me of cooling towers at power-generating plants, they had that sort of a shape. Some of them were just very, very straight and tall with a flat top. Some of them were round, some of them looked like a Quonset hut, you know, with a domed kind of, like a greenhouse. "The particular shot that I saw, there were several clustered together over a landscape, a fairly large landscape. I didn't want to look at it any longer than that because I felt that my life was in jeopardy. Do you understand what I'm saying (laughs)? I would love to have looked at it longer (laughs), I would have loved to have had copies. I would love to have, you know, said more about it or discussed it more, but I knew I couldn't. And I knew that that young fellow who was sharing this was really, really overstepping his bounds at that point."

Joe Murgia

118,258 Aufrufe • vor 28 Tagen

🚨 OPERATIONAL UPDATE: ISRAEL U.S. WAR WITH THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC - Reporting Window: LAST 24 HOURS • Iran widened its fire again with a broad evening missile barrage on central Israel and continued attacks across the Gulf, including a drone strike that hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport • Israel intensified strikes across Iran, with reported hits in Tehran, Qazvin and Alborz industrial areas, plus continued pressure on missile infrastructure and launch cells • Hezbollah kept the northern front active, including a direct rocket hit on a building in Kiryat Shmona, while Israel deepened its Lebanon campaign and Katz publicly framed the objective as a security zone up to the Litani • The diplomatic track moved forward, but only in the strangest possible way: Trump says talks are progressing, Iran still publicly denies direct negotiations, and multiple reports now point to JD Vance as Tehran’s preferred American interlocutor • The big picture is unchanged: the war is still live on every major front, but the center of gravity is shifting toward a contest over how it ends, who gets to define victory, and whether the Gulf will stay adjacent to the war or be pulled fully into it The most important thing to understand about the last 24 hours is that this was not a quiet period masked by negotiations. It was the opposite. The battlefield remained active from Tehran to southern Lebanon to Kuwait, even as Washington and Tehran edged further into a murky negotiation channel. That is what gives the last day its character: not de escalation, but simultaneous escalation and diplomacy, both moving at once. Open source reporting reflects the same picture, with repeated indications of strikes in Tehran and Qazvin, attacks near Baghdad airport, a Kuwait airport fuel fire, and a large Iranian barrage toward central Israel late in the window. **Special thanks to Michael W for your continued contribution to the open-source intel picture behind these updates. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🚀 IRANIAN MISSILE FIRE ON ISRAEL Iran kept up the pressure on Israel in two different ways over this window. Earlier in the cycle, a cluster warhead strike wounded nine people in Bnei Brak, with additional damage in Petah Tikva, while Hezbollah fire from Lebanon killed a woman near Mahanayim Junction and wounded several more in Kiryat Shmona. Later, near the end of the reporting window, Iran launched another broad barrage toward central Israel, with warnings stretching across Gush Dan, Sharon, Wadi Ara, Samaria, Judea and the Dead Sea region. Open source reporting you provided tracked that second wave in real time, showing how broad the alert footprint was even though initial reports indicated no immediate casualties from that specific evening barrage. This is what stands out operationally: Iran’s missile campaign is not gone, but it looks increasingly built around selective disruption rather than the huge opening barrages of the war. The salvos are still dangerous, still capable of civilian casualties and still capable of producing visually dramatic and politically effective moments, but they are landing against a backdrop of steadily intensifying strikes on Iran’s launch network. That makes each successful hit feel more deliberate and more strategic. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ✈️ THE AIR CAMPAIGN OVER IRAN KEPT MOVING Israel’s strike campaign inside Iran also remained broad and geographically layered. Reuters reported renewed Israeli strikes as talks were being floated through intermediaries. Open source intelligence adds texture to that by showing repeated reporting from open source channels of impacts in eastern and western Tehran, the Alborz industrial zone in Qazvin province, and additional blasts reported across Khuzestan and other regions. There were also repeated reports of targeted assassination attempts in east Tehran, which fits the broader pattern of not just degrading launchers and production nodes, but also hunting the people tied to them. The color here matters. This no longer looks like a campaign limited to air defenses and obvious military compounds. The picture from the last 24 hours is of a system being pressed from multiple angles at once: missile depots, industrial support zones, launch crews, command elements and regime infrastructure in and around Tehran. Open source reporting reinforces that sense of breadth, especially the repeated references to Qazvin and Alborz secondary explosions and to ongoing heavy activity over Tehran. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ ⚡ THE ENERGY WAR IS STILL HOT The clearest new regional energy development in this window was Kuwait. Reuters reported that a drone attack hit a fuel tank at Kuwait International Airport, causing a fire but no casualties. That matters not because the material damage was catastrophic, but because it again shows Iran or Iran aligned actors reaching directly for civilian and logistical energy infrastructure in Gulf states. This was not an abstract threat anymore. It was a live strike on a functioning international hub. Your outbox tracked the same event quickly and repeatedly, alongside additional open source reporting about nearby attacks and power disruptions in Kuwait. At the same time, the diplomatic and military discussion around the Strait of Hormuz kept shaping everything else. Markets moved on talk of a U.S. proposal and possible hosted talks in Pakistan or Turkey. Oil eased on negotiation optimism, but the underlying structure of the crisis remains the same: Iran still retains the ability to disrupt shipping and energy confidence without fully “closing” the Strait in a formal sense. That is why even modest signs of diplomacy can move oil sharply, and why even a localized drone strike in Kuwait still carries outsized weight. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇱🇧 LEBANON IS NOT A SIDESHOW The northern front kept boiling. Reuters reported that Israel now intends to occupy a swathe of southern Lebanon up to the Litani River, with Defense Minister Israel Katz explicitly describing a “security zone” concept. That is not rhetoric you use if you still think this is a short punitive phase. At the tactical level, Hezbollah continued to demonstrate that it can still impose costs, including a direct rocket hit on a building in Kiryat Shmona and earlier casualties in the north. Meanwhile, open source reporting pointed to Israeli strikes in Nabatieh, Rashidiya, Bchamoun and broader southern Lebanese infrastructure, which matches the picture of sustained pressure rather than episodic retaliation. The broader meaning is straightforward. Israel is signaling that if the Iran war ends inconclusively on the Iranian front, it does not intend to leave Hezbollah’s northern threat structure intact and simply hope for the best. Lebanon is being shaped now as part of the endgame, not just the current fight. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🇮🇶 IRAQ STAYED ACTIVE TOO Iraq remained active in the background, but it should not be treated as background noise. Open source intel reporting includes repeated reporting on a targeted U.S. strike on a vehicle near Baghdad airport and continued militia related activity tied to U.S. positions and proxy structures. That comes after the prior cycle’s major strikes on PMF and militia command nodes. It fits the larger pattern we have now seen for weeks: Iraq is not the main theater, but it is still one of the places where the war keeps trying to widen horizontally. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌍 THE NEGOTIATION TRACK GOT STRANGER, NOT CLEARER Trump is still publicly presenting the talks as real progress. Reuters reports that Pakistan conveyed a U.S. proposal, with Pakistan or Turkey possible venues, and that Washington has floated a broader framework dealing with nuclear capability, missiles and proxies. At the same time, Iran continues to publicly deny meaningful direct talks and has toughened its public stance, insisting on guarantees, compensation and no rollback of its missile deterrent. What makes the last 24 hours more interesting is the growing focus on who would even talk for the United States. Times of Israel and Jerusalem Post reporting both indicate that JD Vance is increasingly central to the diplomacy, with Tehran reportedly preferring him over Witkoff and Kushner. The diplomatic track here appears as both real and deeply unstable, with questions about who on the Iranian side actually holds authority and whether Washington is now seeking an end state short of outright regime collapse. That shift matters because it tells us something important: Washington increasingly seems to be searching for an off ramp that still looks like victory, while Israel and Gulf allies appear much less comfortable with ending this war before Iran’s military and proxy architecture are degraded further. That tension is now one of the defining features of the conflict. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 📌 WHAT MATTERS MOST RIGHT NOW 1️⃣ The war is still fully active across multiple fronts Iran hit central Israel again, Kuwait airport was struck, Lebanon stayed hot and Israel kept pounding targets inside Iran. Negotiations did not replace combat. They were layered on top of it. 2️⃣ The pressure on Iran’s internal military system keeps deepening The accumulating pattern of strikes in Tehran, Qazvin, Alborz and other areas suggests a campaign that is still broadening the target set, not narrowing it. Open source reporting in your files strongly supports that picture. 3️⃣ The diplomatic track is real, but it is not clean Trump is selling progress. Iran is denying direct talks. Vance is becoming more central. And nobody looking at the battlefield would conclude that the war is genuinely close to stopping on its own. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ BOTTOM LINE The last 24 hours painted a clearer picture than some of the recent reporting windows. This is no longer just a war of salvos and counterstrikes. It is now a war over end states. Iran is still trying to prove it can widen the cost map, not just hit Israel but keep the Gulf under pressure too. Israel is still trying to prove that sustained, system level degradation inside Iran can continue even while diplomacy swirls overhead. And Washington is trying to find a formula that can stop the war without looking like it backed down. That is why the reporting feels different now. The battlefield is still violent, but the arguments over how this ends are becoming just as important as the strikes themselves.

Inside_Israel_Intel

23,818 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten