正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Stock market crash 1995 vs 2026 Same pattern: 1995: Huge overvalued Palm IPO -> Dot-Com Bubble crash 2026: Huge overvalued Anthropic IPO -> AI Bubble crash coming Remember that I was first to warn you..

61,908 次观看 • 15 天前 •via X (Twitter)

18 条评论

CryptoRaf (💙,🧡)🛸 的头像
CryptoRaf (💙,🧡)🛸15 天前

Completely useless comparison. In dot com bubble they were worthless companies. Currently they are making billions.

Ray 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇹🇭 的头像
Ray 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿🇹🇭15 天前

So wrong, investment in the web v ai is a completely different beast.

IBMe 的头像
IBMe15 天前

All the fear talk is interesting. How long have you been waiting for a crash?

pw 的头像
pw15 天前

1995? Are u drunk? Get year right first

Cornfed 的头像
Cornfed15 天前

You are hardly the first. Doesn't mean you're wrong, but lots of people beating that drum rn.

David Miller 的头像
David Miller15 天前

Solid insight here. When I’m looking through stocks, your posts and @BrianReid11BR’s are my first stops.

Jan Scott 的头像
Jan Scott15 天前

You forget that each new bubble is bigger than the previous bubbles.

EBX Capital 的头像
EBX Capital15 天前

Market wasn't rigged in 2000/2008 crash & traded like free markets should. Today's market is rigged to the max & trades like the algorithms dictate. Zero chance of major 50% crash. ZERO

Umbrella 的头像
Umbrella15 天前

Pattern matching across eras is tempting, but infrastructure adoption matters more than IPO symbolism. 📚

Macro Bombastic 的头像
Macro Bombastic15 天前

tbh comparing an ipo to 1995 feels like a stretch, every cycle's different man

Singularity Ascent 的头像
Singularity Ascent15 天前

IPO charts rhyme every cycle. The harder question is whether cash burn still buys a moat once open-weight models already take most of the token volume.

Wolfie 的头像
Wolfie15 天前

We are so fkd

Mati Alon 的头像
Mati Alon15 天前

I never know which ticker from your daily research is going to send me down a new rabbit hole, and that’s part of the fun. @nickdannunzio has a similar way of sparking my curiosity. You’re the two analysts I’m always interested in learning from.

Lobster slayer 的头像
Lobster slayer15 天前

Wow! PALM went public March 5th 2000. The peak of the .com bubble for the Nasdaq was March 10th

Catherine Sinclair 的头像
Catherine Sinclair15 天前

Interesting comparison. Valuation extremes are always worth paying attention to, even if every cycle plays out differently. I like seeing both sides of the argument. You and @SophiaBlackkod are two of my favorite market follows.

William Dolan JR 的头像
William Dolan JR14 天前

I won’t touch that stock I am all space x and Tesla

Kemar7856 的头像
Kemar785615 天前

You all said same thing about SpaceX

The Crypto Academy 的头像
The Crypto Academy15 天前

Palm's IPO was in March 2000, not 1995, and it was more a symptom of dot-com excess than the cause of the crash. An Anthropic IPO could expose extreme AI valuations, but one similar-looking chart is not enough to establish the same market outcome.

相关视频