Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🎥 Stones That Shouldn’t Exist These blocks look molded — not carved. Pressed together like warm wax. No chisel marks. No mortar. So how did they build this? Modern science still can’t explain it. But the ancients could. Whatever this was… it wasn’t primitive. 🔒 © Archival footage. Educational... show more

nikola 3

483,139 subscribers

20,977 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии Образование

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

MEET THE ANCIENT STONEWORK WE STILL CAN’T RECREATE Machu Picchu’s polygonal masonry isn’t just pretty, it’s earthquake-proof. Giant stones are cut so perfectly you can’t slip a credit card between them, with special “fuse stones” that break under pressure to save the wall. The blocks? Diorite, one of the hardest rocks on Earth, shows signs of melting and bending. MIT tried copying it with concrete on a flat floor, but these guys did it on mountains… with no cranes, no forklifts, and no written instructions. In Cusco, this tech hides under colonial cathedrals, and next to a KFC. We have no clue how they carved, moved, or fit them together. Modern builders can’t match it. The mystery’s still unsolved, and those stones aren’t talking. Source: bassforge. us

MEET THE ANCIENT STONEWORK WE STILL CAN’T RECREATE Machu Picchu’s polygonal masonry isn’t just pretty, it’s earthquake-proof. Giant stones are cut so perfectly you can’t slip a credit card between them, with special “fuse stones” that break under pressure to save the wall. The blocks? Diorite, one of the hardest rocks on Earth, shows signs of melting and bending. MIT tried copying it with concrete on a flat floor, but these guys did it on mountains… with no cranes, no forklifts, and no written instructions. In Cusco, this tech hides under colonial cathedrals, and next to a KFC. We have no clue how they carved, moved, or fit them together. Modern builders can’t match it. The mystery’s still unsolved, and those stones aren’t talking. Source: bassforge. us

Mario Nawfal

107,159 просмотров • 1 год назад

Explain this. This is a 92-foot-deep, 23-foot-wide shaft in Saqqara, Egypt. It was carved directly into solid limestone bedrock. 🤯 How did they keep the walls so straight? People often say ancient builders had simple tools. But when you look at something like this, it's hard not to question that explanation. Because digging a hole is one thing. Carving a giant shaft directly into bedrock is another.

Explain this. This is a 92-foot-deep, 23-foot-wide shaft in Saqqara, Egypt. It was carved directly into solid limestone bedrock. 🤯 How did they keep the walls so straight? People often say ancient builders had simple tools. But when you look at something like this, it's hard not to question that explanation. Because digging a hole is one thing. Carving a giant shaft directly into bedrock is another.

Forgotten History

60,246 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨This One Thing DESTROYS The Narrative! Once you absorb this simple fact, you can't actually deny how illogical the mainstream historical narrative is here: Walking around Ollantaytambo in Perus Sacred Valley, you find huge megalithic blocks of rose quartz granite strewn across the hillside, like they were blown over with tremendous force. Some of the megalithic work is still intact but most of it has been severely damaged. Then we see simplistic, rough-cut stone walls and structures that are STILL STANDING. These walls use mud and simple mortar as a binding agent, unlike the megalithic work they are not in the least bit resistant to significant kinetic force, you see these simple stone wall techniques tucked into cracks and corners where megalithic work has been damaged/moved, i.e RESTORATION, clear, evidential restoration attempts with significantly inferior stone building techniques. I could take these simple walls down with a sledgehammer. I couldn't take some of the surviving megalithic walls down with a wrecking ball. But mainstream archeologists will insist that both the megalithic, precision shaped, air-tight fitted, non-mortar using, kinetically resistant, multi-ton, extremely hard stone material constructs, that demonstrably show they have survived majorly destructive forces, were constructed by the same people (Inca) who made the rough-cut walls that show no signs of undergoing significant damage, during the same time period of around 600 years ago. This is literally devoid of logic, but this is what we are being told to believe.

🚨This One Thing DESTROYS The Narrative! Once you absorb this simple fact, you can't actually deny how illogical the mainstream historical narrative is here: Walking around Ollantaytambo in Perus Sacred Valley, you find huge megalithic blocks of rose quartz granite strewn across the hillside, like they were blown over with tremendous force. Some of the megalithic work is still intact but most of it has been severely damaged. Then we see simplistic, rough-cut stone walls and structures that are STILL STANDING. These walls use mud and simple mortar as a binding agent, unlike the megalithic work they are not in the least bit resistant to significant kinetic force, you see these simple stone wall techniques tucked into cracks and corners where megalithic work has been damaged/moved, i.e RESTORATION, clear, evidential restoration attempts with significantly inferior stone building techniques. I could take these simple walls down with a sledgehammer. I couldn't take some of the surviving megalithic walls down with a wrecking ball. But mainstream archeologists will insist that both the megalithic, precision shaped, air-tight fitted, non-mortar using, kinetically resistant, multi-ton, extremely hard stone material constructs, that demonstrably show they have survived majorly destructive forces, were constructed by the same people (Inca) who made the rough-cut walls that show no signs of undergoing significant damage, during the same time period of around 600 years ago. This is literally devoid of logic, but this is what we are being told to believe.

Jay Anderson

273,941 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Paul Aron on McLaren’s strategy: “From my perspective, the only way I could kind of justify it is I thought maybe they wanted to leave Oscar out because they were afraid of giving away track position to Max. But then if you take Lando's situation, to be fair, it was a no-brainer to pit him because he had no first place to lose, so he wasn’t giving away any track position. And then I thought maybe they didn’t pit Lando either because they wanted to keep it fair between the two drivers. That’s the only explanation I could give it, that once they realised that they’d messed it up with Oscar, they kept Lando on the same strategy, not to give one the edge over the other. But ultimately I think everyone knew straight away that was a mistake. And it doesn’t matter how quick you are, I think nowadays with these cars, even how close they are, you can’t expect to make back a pit-stop gap with just pure race pace. So yeah, I think everyone knew that it was a bit of a mistake from them.”

Paul Aron on McLaren’s strategy: “From my perspective, the only way I could kind of justify it is I thought maybe they wanted to leave Oscar out because they were afraid of giving away track position to Max. But then if you take Lando's situation, to be fair, it was a no-brainer to pit him because he had no first place to lose, so he wasn’t giving away any track position. And then I thought maybe they didn’t pit Lando either because they wanted to keep it fair between the two drivers. That’s the only explanation I could give it, that once they realised that they’d messed it up with Oscar, they kept Lando on the same strategy, not to give one the edge over the other. But ultimately I think everyone knew straight away that was a mistake. And it doesn’t matter how quick you are, I think nowadays with these cars, even how close they are, you can’t expect to make back a pit-stop gap with just pure race pace. So yeah, I think everyone knew that it was a bit of a mistake from them.”

naenia ¹ ⁶³

315,831 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Advanced Non-Human Stonemasons: The Hidden Legacy of Earth’s First Builders🛸💫🦎👽🧠👁️ 1. Evidence of Advanced Tool Use in Megalithic Structures Across sacred sites like Ba’albek, Giza, Puma Punku, and the Osirion, we see: •Ultra-flat surfaces—impossible with primitive chisels. •Tool marks resembling rotary or ultrasonic drills. •Stone blocks weighing hundreds of tons, moved and fitted with sub-millimeter precision. •Symmetrical boreholes in granite, which can only be made today with diamond-tipped drills or laser-guided cutting equipment. These are not the hallmarks of “trial-and-error” Bronze Age engineers—they are signatures of precision tech—tools likely using: •Photonic or plasma-based energy (laser-type light cutters) •Resonance or sound-wave modulation to weaken molecular bonds (like in acoustic levitation) •High-speed rotary tools with crystalline tips, potentially grown or synthesized by the NHIs themselves These technologies imply a mastery of material science, frequency tuning, and energetic interfaces that surpasses even modern equivalents—and yet no ancient texts describe the invention of such tools. Why? Because they weren’t invented by humans. They were inherited—and later hidden. 2. The Geopolymer Cover-Up: A False Alchemy In recent decades, academic institutions and media influencers have pushed the “geopolymer theory”—claiming that ancient structures were not carved from stone, but molded like cement. This theory suggests: •Builders poured soft stone paste into molds to create blocks •No cutting was necessary—just “primitive chemistry” But this theory collapses under scrutiny: •Natural veins, fossil inclusions, and sediment layering in blocks like those at Sacsayhuamán and Giza show they were quarried and carved, not cast. •Granite, one of the hardest stones used in these sites, cannot be geopolymerized by any known ancient process. •The geopolymer hypothesis fails to explain the interlocking, earthquake-proof geometry or the wear patterns consistent with cutting, polishing, and transport. Why push this theory? Because if the world accepted the truth—that these stones were cut using tools we don’t possess today—it would trigger an avalanche of questions about who really built these monuments. Geopolymer theory is controlled opposition—a false narrative to: •Explain away the impossible •Deny the existence of NHI intervention •Shield modern power structures from the implications 3. The Brainwashing of Humanity: From Witness to Amnesia The earliest civilizations remembered these beings. They built temples in their honor, encoded their knowledge in glyphs, aligned monuments to their arrival points in the stars. These “gods” were real—and terrifying. But over time, through conquest, colonization, and religious rewriting: •Oral traditions were branded myth •Sacred art was rebranded symbolism •The hybrid priest-kings were reduced to tyrants or fanatics •And the visible evidence—the stones themselves—was re-explained with scientifically approved lies This was not ignorance—it was erasure. Institutions like: •The Vatican •Colonial empires •Modern academia All participated—not always knowingly—in a systematic suppression of the NHI presence. Disclosure was never just about spacecraft—it was about who taught us, who built the foundations of civilization, and who still walks in the shadows. 4. Reclaiming the Legacy: The Return of the Stone Masters You are not alone in seeing this. Across the world, a network of Truthkeepers is awakening. You are reassembling the blueprint: •Tohil, K’awiil, and Osiris as the luminous stonecarvers •Nommo and Chitauri as the bringers of architecture, language, and law •Elongated skulls as biological links to the builders •Underground bases and transmedium ships as the next layer of connection

Advanced Non-Human Stonemasons: The Hidden Legacy of Earth’s First Builders🛸💫🦎👽🧠👁️ 1. Evidence of Advanced Tool Use in Megalithic Structures Across sacred sites like Ba’albek, Giza, Puma Punku, and the Osirion, we see: •Ultra-flat surfaces—impossible with primitive chisels. •Tool marks resembling rotary or ultrasonic drills. •Stone blocks weighing hundreds of tons, moved and fitted with sub-millimeter precision. •Symmetrical boreholes in granite, which can only be made today with diamond-tipped drills or laser-guided cutting equipment. These are not the hallmarks of “trial-and-error” Bronze Age engineers—they are signatures of precision tech—tools likely using: •Photonic or plasma-based energy (laser-type light cutters) •Resonance or sound-wave modulation to weaken molecular bonds (like in acoustic levitation) •High-speed rotary tools with crystalline tips, potentially grown or synthesized by the NHIs themselves These technologies imply a mastery of material science, frequency tuning, and energetic interfaces that surpasses even modern equivalents—and yet no ancient texts describe the invention of such tools. Why? Because they weren’t invented by humans. They were inherited—and later hidden. 2. The Geopolymer Cover-Up: A False Alchemy In recent decades, academic institutions and media influencers have pushed the “geopolymer theory”—claiming that ancient structures were not carved from stone, but molded like cement. This theory suggests: •Builders poured soft stone paste into molds to create blocks •No cutting was necessary—just “primitive chemistry” But this theory collapses under scrutiny: •Natural veins, fossil inclusions, and sediment layering in blocks like those at Sacsayhuamán and Giza show they were quarried and carved, not cast. •Granite, one of the hardest stones used in these sites, cannot be geopolymerized by any known ancient process. •The geopolymer hypothesis fails to explain the interlocking, earthquake-proof geometry or the wear patterns consistent with cutting, polishing, and transport. Why push this theory? Because if the world accepted the truth—that these stones were cut using tools we don’t possess today—it would trigger an avalanche of questions about who really built these monuments. Geopolymer theory is controlled opposition—a false narrative to: •Explain away the impossible •Deny the existence of NHI intervention •Shield modern power structures from the implications 3. The Brainwashing of Humanity: From Witness to Amnesia The earliest civilizations remembered these beings. They built temples in their honor, encoded their knowledge in glyphs, aligned monuments to their arrival points in the stars. These “gods” were real—and terrifying. But over time, through conquest, colonization, and religious rewriting: •Oral traditions were branded myth •Sacred art was rebranded symbolism •The hybrid priest-kings were reduced to tyrants or fanatics •And the visible evidence—the stones themselves—was re-explained with scientifically approved lies This was not ignorance—it was erasure. Institutions like: •The Vatican •Colonial empires •Modern academia All participated—not always knowingly—in a systematic suppression of the NHI presence. Disclosure was never just about spacecraft—it was about who taught us, who built the foundations of civilization, and who still walks in the shadows. 4. Reclaiming the Legacy: The Return of the Stone Masters You are not alone in seeing this. Across the world, a network of Truthkeepers is awakening. You are reassembling the blueprint: •Tohil, K’awiil, and Osiris as the luminous stonecarvers •Nommo and Chitauri as the bringers of architecture, language, and law •Elongated skulls as biological links to the builders •Underground bases and transmedium ships as the next layer of connection

Jack

70,757 просмотров • 1 год назад

The former President of a Russian Republic just revealed that he was taken on a UFO in 1997. And aliens told him the truth about the pyramids and ancient civilizations. This is the shocking truths about humanity’s origins that he was told by ETs: Kirsan Ilyumzhinov: “All these ancient texts did not appear out of nowhere.” “The Vedas, the Quran, the Bible, the Talmud.” “When you look at old irrigation systems, the whole water supply, the melioration work in Egypt, or the buildings in Peru, or in Lebanon, in Egypt, the pyramids—things no computer today could really calculate, they built it with such precision.” “The pillar in the center of Delhi in India [is] 99.9% iron.” “In modern conditions, no metallurgical plant, not a single blast furnace can produce iron that pure.” “No modern technology can actually recreate that.” “Even the largest cranes we have today couldn’t lift these 100-ton stone blocks, the slabs used in building ancient palaces.” “In Brazil, when they’re sawing through marble mountains, cutting marble slabs, they find pieces of a clock inside the marble.” “They even found a gear.” “How is that possible?” “This marble took millions and millions of years to form.” “So it must have been another civilization that built it.” Jesse Michels

The former President of a Russian Republic just revealed that he was taken on a UFO in 1997. And aliens told him the truth about the pyramids and ancient civilizations. This is the shocking truths about humanity’s origins that he was told by ETs: Kirsan Ilyumzhinov: “All these ancient texts did not appear out of nowhere.” “The Vedas, the Quran, the Bible, the Talmud.” “When you look at old irrigation systems, the whole water supply, the melioration work in Egypt, or the buildings in Peru, or in Lebanon, in Egypt, the pyramids—things no computer today could really calculate, they built it with such precision.” “The pillar in the center of Delhi in India [is] 99.9% iron.” “In modern conditions, no metallurgical plant, not a single blast furnace can produce iron that pure.” “No modern technology can actually recreate that.” “Even the largest cranes we have today couldn’t lift these 100-ton stone blocks, the slabs used in building ancient palaces.” “In Brazil, when they’re sawing through marble mountains, cutting marble slabs, they find pieces of a clock inside the marble.” “They even found a gear.” “How is that possible?” “This marble took millions and millions of years to form.” “So it must have been another civilization that built it.” Jesse Michels

Holden Culotta

87,847 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche Issues Chilling Message to the COVID Cartel “You all have committed crimes.” “If these people would now go out and say, ‘Oh, wait a minute. We have been making some mistakes. It wasn’t all right ... We have to revise our opinion.’ These people would be stoned in the street.” “They have no choice” other than to keep pushing the big lie, Geert Vanden Bossche said. “They have no choice. They have no choice other than to stick, even if they completely see how wrong they have been, they have no other choice. They can only hope that something will happen that will distract from this issue, that will distract me. But it won’t. It won’t. And so, they keep silent, or they just continue along the path that they have been walking along so far. But I can tell you that many of them must be desperate.” Bossche continued. “Being together, they feel protected. This is a big lobby. And they think that everybody thinks that the other will protect them, right? Which is not the case. But this is this typical feeling. You all have committed crimes, but you are a big rope. And it’s like the mafia, and you feel all together, you feel like a big team, and nobody can penetrate into the team, et cetera. It will collapse because the truth will surface.”

Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche Issues Chilling Message to the COVID Cartel “You all have committed crimes.” “If these people would now go out and say, ‘Oh, wait a minute. We have been making some mistakes. It wasn’t all right ... We have to revise our opinion.’ These people would be stoned in the street.” “They have no choice” other than to keep pushing the big lie, Geert Vanden Bossche said. “They have no choice. They have no choice other than to stick, even if they completely see how wrong they have been, they have no other choice. They can only hope that something will happen that will distract from this issue, that will distract me. But it won’t. It won’t. And so, they keep silent, or they just continue along the path that they have been walking along so far. But I can tell you that many of them must be desperate.” Bossche continued. “Being together, they feel protected. This is a big lobby. And they think that everybody thinks that the other will protect them, right? Which is not the case. But this is this typical feeling. You all have committed crimes, but you are a big rope. And it’s like the mafia, and you feel all together, you feel like a big team, and nobody can penetrate into the team, et cetera. It will collapse because the truth will surface.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

603,355 просмотров • 2 лет назад

This is insane So it turns out Donald Trump didn’t order an end to the temporary protected status of the 350,000 Haitians The executive order was made by Biden and was just expiring, but a Federal Judge decided it’s not allowed to expire “This is starting to border on insanity. So Biden administration put in a temporary protection order for 350,000 Haitians. It was done through executive order, so there was no vote, there was no law, there was no legislation. It was just the Biden administration saying, I wanna give these people temporary protected status, which he's allowed to do. Now, when Trump came in office, he could have created an executive order and got rid of it, but he said, I'm not even gonna do that. I'm just gonna let it expire. Like, this is not the Trump administration doing anything. They are just letting the policy from Biden expire when it was supposed to. However, a Washington DC based federal judge, Ana Reyes, who is a Biden appointee, has blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending temporary protected status, which is, I hate the way that's worded because that's not what they did. No, the Trump administration isn't ending their protected status. They're simply letting the executive order from the Biden administration expire when it was supposed to. And now you have a judge who basically says, You don't get to do that. You don't get to let executive orders expire. That is f*cking insane. This isn't a law. This isn't legislation. Nobody voted on this. This was just the Biden administration saying, I want to temporarily protect these 350,000 Haitians. And Trump saying, okay, I'm gonna let that status expire and they can be deported. And a judge who has no purview in this whatsoever was just like, No, I'm gonna set immigration legislation. I'm gonna set policy….. She doesn't get to do that.”

This is insane So it turns out Donald Trump didn’t order an end to the temporary protected status of the 350,000 Haitians The executive order was made by Biden and was just expiring, but a Federal Judge decided it’s not allowed to expire “This is starting to border on insanity. So Biden administration put in a temporary protection order for 350,000 Haitians. It was done through executive order, so there was no vote, there was no law, there was no legislation. It was just the Biden administration saying, I wanna give these people temporary protected status, which he's allowed to do. Now, when Trump came in office, he could have created an executive order and got rid of it, but he said, I'm not even gonna do that. I'm just gonna let it expire. Like, this is not the Trump administration doing anything. They are just letting the policy from Biden expire when it was supposed to. However, a Washington DC based federal judge, Ana Reyes, who is a Biden appointee, has blocked the Department of Homeland Security from ending temporary protected status, which is, I hate the way that's worded because that's not what they did. No, the Trump administration isn't ending their protected status. They're simply letting the executive order from the Biden administration expire when it was supposed to. And now you have a judge who basically says, You don't get to do that. You don't get to let executive orders expire. That is f*cking insane. This isn't a law. This isn't legislation. Nobody voted on this. This was just the Biden administration saying, I want to temporarily protect these 350,000 Haitians. And Trump saying, okay, I'm gonna let that status expire and they can be deported. And a judge who has no purview in this whatsoever was just like, No, I'm gonna set immigration legislation. I'm gonna set policy….. She doesn't get to do that.”

Wall Street Apes

994,892 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

This is an important piece of tape from Jason Chaffetz, former House Oversight chair, that helps explain why the Obama admin's manufactured intelligence hoax never saw the light of day until Tulsi Gabbard declassified the documents: "Remember you had an Obama administration and later a Biden Administration that did everything it could to bury that, and allow people like me, I was the Chairman of the Oversight Committee, they would NOT provide these documents, and that deep state continued on in perpetuity to hide that information that was clearly asked under subpeona, and it never happened." "They're a lying sack of ... I can't say it at this hour. But they lied to us. And they should pay the price. No more free passes."

This is an important piece of tape from Jason Chaffetz, former House Oversight chair, that helps explain why the Obama admin's manufactured intelligence hoax never saw the light of day until Tulsi Gabbard declassified the documents: "Remember you had an Obama administration and later a Biden Administration that did everything it could to bury that, and allow people like me, I was the Chairman of the Oversight Committee, they would NOT provide these documents, and that deep state continued on in perpetuity to hide that information that was clearly asked under subpeona, and it never happened." "They're a lying sack of ... I can't say it at this hour. But they lied to us. And they should pay the price. No more free passes."

Charlie Kirk

779,492 просмотров • 1 год назад

JUNIOR MRBIG PILLOW LIVE #mrbigxJunior 🌞: Like… ok let me tell you. Ju was sharing a room with Tay, and… it wasn’t a- it wasn’t a single bed. It was twin beds. But with the twin beds, when we first walked into the room, they’d been pushed together. At first, I didn’t think much of it… Tay sleeps sooooo restlessly!! Like Tay slept like this (drops something while acting it out😂) Sorry, sorry, sorry kub. Like Tay tosses and turns so much!! Tay really moves around a lot! It’s not that he’s tossing and turning all night but it’s more like… whenever he moves, he flings himself around really hard!! And then Ju would wake up… kept waking up in the middle of the night. After that, a treaty was formed! 🎤: About what? 🌞: it’s that we drew the maritime boundary! The pillows were this close together and the beds were this close together, right? 🎤: Right! 🌞: So I grabbed them and pulled them apart like this. Separateeee!! Separate them apart like this! 🎤: One on each side 🤣 🌞: One on each side! And believe it or not, he could still fling his blanket over and hit me! I was so mad seriously!! So mad!! Like… the beds were separated. How do I explain it… the distance was about… from me to that light stand over there. 🎤: Ui! But that’s really far! 🌞: It was… it was pretty far! Tay’s bed was around here, and Ju’s bed was… over here. And he could still fling… his blanket over onto me in the middle of the night!! Just think about it!!!! Oho… seriously! But Tay’s the type who takes up the whole bed when he sleeps. He’s the type who sleeps with his arms and legs all (stretched out) big wide everywhere! 🎤: Really making full use of the space! 🌞: Exactly! Maybe it’s because… the pillow Tay had wasn’t supporting his body properly~

JUNIOR MRBIG PILLOW LIVE #mrbigxJunior 🌞: Like… ok let me tell you. Ju was sharing a room with Tay, and… it wasn’t a- it wasn’t a single bed. It was twin beds. But with the twin beds, when we first walked into the room, they’d been pushed together. At first, I didn’t think much of it… Tay sleeps sooooo restlessly!! Like Tay slept like this (drops something while acting it out😂) Sorry, sorry, sorry kub. Like Tay tosses and turns so much!! Tay really moves around a lot! It’s not that he’s tossing and turning all night but it’s more like… whenever he moves, he flings himself around really hard!! And then Ju would wake up… kept waking up in the middle of the night. After that, a treaty was formed! 🎤: About what? 🌞: it’s that we drew the maritime boundary! The pillows were this close together and the beds were this close together, right? 🎤: Right! 🌞: So I grabbed them and pulled them apart like this. Separateeee!! Separate them apart like this! 🎤: One on each side 🤣 🌞: One on each side! And believe it or not, he could still fling his blanket over and hit me! I was so mad seriously!! So mad!! Like… the beds were separated. How do I explain it… the distance was about… from me to that light stand over there. 🎤: Ui! But that’s really far! 🌞: It was… it was pretty far! Tay’s bed was around here, and Ju’s bed was… over here. And he could still fling… his blanket over onto me in the middle of the night!! Just think about it!!!! Oho… seriously! But Tay’s the type who takes up the whole bed when he sleeps. He’s the type who sleeps with his arms and legs all (stretched out) big wide everywhere! 🎤: Really making full use of the space! 🌞: Exactly! Maybe it’s because… the pillow Tay had wasn’t supporting his body properly~

jamie🍓♥︎🦝

13,755 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Isack: “I remember being in the cooldown room with Max and Oscar. And they were ready for that. And, you know, they had their trainers with towels, so they could change and I was like… and I looked at Harry, my guy. I was like ‘you brought me a towel?’ He was like ‘no, of course.’[..] And they all had like brand new suits because after the podium you stink and they get changed and they had like this custom towel where they fit it around them so they can actually like get changed without like- I was amazed. I was like wow.” 🗣️: “So then you went up on the podium in your disgusting sweaty suit.” Isack: “Yeah exactly. During press conference and these guys smelled good. They were brand new and I was like ‘that's not fair.’” i actually did not know drivers were changing into new race suits after the podium?? but it seems isack and his trainer also didn't know, so… 😂

naenia ¹ ⁶³

525,777 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

New video of what is a supposed UAP being struck by a Hellfire missile: Analysis What isn’t discussed at the hearing nor anyone who doesn’t have exposure to footage like this is the fact that the Hellfire missile doesn’t appear to detonate. This is important as it shows the missile only clipping the object, which most likely is a drone. If the missile doesn’t detonate and only clips one of the rotors of a drone (if that’s what this is), then it would explain why the drone could potentially recover and carry on…to a distance longer than the video shows but we don’t know how far that actually was. It could have eventually crashed in the water. Also, important to note that the authorization to use that munition signifies that the user was given a green light at targeting a potential threat. This isn’t done lightly. This means that it was identified enough to a degree to be a potential threat (like an adversarial drone) and was intentionally targeted. That wouldn’t happen if it was a truly unidentified objects or actual alien space ship. They would observe until it was deemed to be hostile in nature. This could also be a potential C-UAS test strike on the efficiencies of targeting in-flight drones with conventional munitions and how accurate they are. But more information needs to be presented to determine that. In conclusion, this appears to be nothing more than a failed strike of what was claimed to be a Hellfire missile on a traveling drone. The munition did not detonate, clipping the object but only to a degree that it still had flight capability after.

Chris Unleashed

288,723 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

How Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) Buried Whistleblower Barry Young's Protected Disclosure. Barry Young details how he made a protected disclosure to Health New Zealand’s executive leadership team with statistical evidence suggesting serious vaccine safety issues. After extensive review with epidemiologists, doctors, and statisticians, he calculated odds of 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing the observed signals. The handling of his Protected Disclosure reveals suppression of evidence, which would be potentially serious illegality, at the highest levels of the Ministry of Health. Barry had to raise several OIA (Official Information Act) requests to obtain the evidence that Health New Zealand had indeed received his original Protected Disclosure email, despite the evidence being "buried away in an Accenture Report, which was a Forensics Report." This is essential viewing for anyone who has concerns about government transparency, public health accountability, and Whistleblower Protections in New Zealand and beyond. Transcript: "I gave it to Health New Zealand, that was my protected disclosure... And only after doing a lot of due diligence with a lot of experts and statisticians and doctors who looked at it and I found out in hindsight I'm perfectly allowed to do that under the act to see how and whether that's important, whether to make a protected disclosure. It was all... red flag, red flag, red flag. So yes, I did put all that together, I did some crude analysis back then, getting a lot better at it now. And I just came up with some numbers that was 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing this. I can't say for sure, I can never say that. And I sent that in an email to the executive leadership team at Health New Zealand. So of course, yeah, yeah, to make them aware of what I was saying and that formed the protected disclosure which was the whole purpose of the act, which is why we're here. Of course, they just ignored that and retaliated. In the police disclosures, I didn't even see a sign of that original email that I sent, they tried to bury it, they tried to withhold it from evidence because it was a protected disclosure. The original ELT email, the only one they did provide as evidence was the email I sent to the MPs, not knowing that that wasn't a protected disclosure. I didn't know the act at the time, but they withheld the one I sent to the executive leadership team. And the only reason that I can think of they did that was to try and avoid saying that it was a protected disclosure. They tried to bury it. I... emailed them, the Crown, the police, where's the email that I sent to the executive team? Oh no, we've sent you everything that we have. So I thought, that's a bit strange. I did send an email. ... I had to resort to writing OIA's to Health New Zealand, which they denied. They said, oh no, we didn't, there's no email sent from you at that time to these people. Your request is denied because it doesn't exist. And I wrote back to them. I said, check again, please. These are the times. These are the dates. And they said, we've gone back and we've done a thorough check and we stand by original decision. The email doesn't exist. So Health New Zealand said twice that email doesn't exist. I found it. The evidence buried away in an Accenture report, which was a forensics report. I said, hang on a minute. There's the email there in that report. Only after that did the police and the Crown reply to me. And lo and behold, there it was. The protected disclosure email... produced nearly a year after I was charged. It should have been the very first thing that they sent and [that] they dealt with. ...Looking at a protected disclosure, the way it's meant to be, they're meant to receive it and acknowledge it and reply to it. They tried to bury it."

How Health New Zealand (Te Whatu Ora) Buried Whistleblower Barry Young's Protected Disclosure. Barry Young details how he made a protected disclosure to Health New Zealand’s executive leadership team with statistical evidence suggesting serious vaccine safety issues. After extensive review with epidemiologists, doctors, and statisticians, he calculated odds of 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing the observed signals. The handling of his Protected Disclosure reveals suppression of evidence, which would be potentially serious illegality, at the highest levels of the Ministry of Health. Barry had to raise several OIA (Official Information Act) requests to obtain the evidence that Health New Zealand had indeed received his original Protected Disclosure email, despite the evidence being "buried away in an Accenture Report, which was a Forensics Report." This is essential viewing for anyone who has concerns about government transparency, public health accountability, and Whistleblower Protections in New Zealand and beyond. Transcript: "I gave it to Health New Zealand, that was my protected disclosure... And only after doing a lot of due diligence with a lot of experts and statisticians and doctors who looked at it and I found out in hindsight I'm perfectly allowed to do that under the act to see how and whether that's important, whether to make a protected disclosure. It was all... red flag, red flag, red flag. So yes, I did put all that together, I did some crude analysis back then, getting a lot better at it now. And I just came up with some numbers that was 100 billion to one against the vaccine not causing this. I can't say for sure, I can never say that. And I sent that in an email to the executive leadership team at Health New Zealand. So of course, yeah, yeah, to make them aware of what I was saying and that formed the protected disclosure which was the whole purpose of the act, which is why we're here. Of course, they just ignored that and retaliated. In the police disclosures, I didn't even see a sign of that original email that I sent, they tried to bury it, they tried to withhold it from evidence because it was a protected disclosure. The original ELT email, the only one they did provide as evidence was the email I sent to the MPs, not knowing that that wasn't a protected disclosure. I didn't know the act at the time, but they withheld the one I sent to the executive leadership team. And the only reason that I can think of they did that was to try and avoid saying that it was a protected disclosure. They tried to bury it. I... emailed them, the Crown, the police, where's the email that I sent to the executive team? Oh no, we've sent you everything that we have. So I thought, that's a bit strange. I did send an email. ... I had to resort to writing OIA's to Health New Zealand, which they denied. They said, oh no, we didn't, there's no email sent from you at that time to these people. Your request is denied because it doesn't exist. And I wrote back to them. I said, check again, please. These are the times. These are the dates. And they said, we've gone back and we've done a thorough check and we stand by original decision. The email doesn't exist. So Health New Zealand said twice that email doesn't exist. I found it. The evidence buried away in an Accenture report, which was a forensics report. I said, hang on a minute. There's the email there in that report. Only after that did the police and the Crown reply to me. And lo and behold, there it was. The protected disclosure email... produced nearly a year after I was charged. It should have been the very first thing that they sent and [that] they dealt with. ...Looking at a protected disclosure, the way it's meant to be, they're meant to receive it and acknowledge it and reply to it. They tried to bury it."

Liz Gunn

12,711 просмотров • 17 дней назад

Everyone is up-in-arms over the Matt Rife comedy special. Every time a comedian comes under fire, this is what I wish I could scream from the rooftops: You’re allowed to speak about what you find to be “inappropriate” comedy, but just understand that—in this instance—you almost always sound annoying to everyone else in the room. You sound like every other person who’s ever complained about how we “shouldn’t joke about that.” In this instance, there’s nothing special, moving, or compelling about your voice. If a joke fails with an audience, a joke fails. If it fails repeatedly, it’s probably either not funny or not delivered well. If it’s not funny, it shouldn’t be told. But at a COMEDY show, that’s literally the only reason to censor yourself—because what you were gonna say was overwhelming not funny—not because it “wasn’t appropriate.” If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen, snowflakes. *and no, this isn’t me saying I thought the joke—or the special (which I haven’t seen)—was funny.

Everyone is up-in-arms over the Matt Rife comedy special. Every time a comedian comes under fire, this is what I wish I could scream from the rooftops: You’re allowed to speak about what you find to be “inappropriate” comedy, but just understand that—in this instance—you almost always sound annoying to everyone else in the room. You sound like every other person who’s ever complained about how we “shouldn’t joke about that.” In this instance, there’s nothing special, moving, or compelling about your voice. If a joke fails with an audience, a joke fails. If it fails repeatedly, it’s probably either not funny or not delivered well. If it’s not funny, it shouldn’t be told. But at a COMEDY show, that’s literally the only reason to censor yourself—because what you were gonna say was overwhelming not funny—not because it “wasn’t appropriate.” If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen, snowflakes. *and no, this isn’t me saying I thought the joke—or the special (which I haven’t seen)—was funny.

Natalie Jean Beisner

112,966 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Bill Maher exposes how the socialist wave inside the Democrat Party is no longer just a fringe movement. Maher says every day he sees another candidate pushing what “nutty” policies...up to and including abolishing police and prisons. MAHER: “It’s not just a few people anymore.” “I read…every day, I read about a new person in some Colorado and Wisconsin, somebody who is saying some variation of not defund the police, ABOLISH the police.” “No prisons, no police.” “Like what world did they think we could possibly live in under these conditions?” “There’s just a level of nutty that I’m so glad that whenever it was, I was like, no, I’m not going along because this is where it ends.”

Bill Maher exposes how the socialist wave inside the Democrat Party is no longer just a fringe movement. Maher says every day he sees another candidate pushing what “nutty” policies...up to and including abolishing police and prisons. MAHER: “It’s not just a few people anymore.” “I read…every day, I read about a new person in some Colorado and Wisconsin, somebody who is saying some variation of not defund the police, ABOLISH the police.” “No prisons, no police.” “Like what world did they think we could possibly live in under these conditions?” “There’s just a level of nutty that I’m so glad that whenever it was, I was like, no, I’m not going along because this is where it ends.”

Overton

16,815 просмотров • 20 дней назад

Kennedy’s plan landed like a thunderclap and the pushback began almost immediately. Not everyone in the room welcomed Kennedy’s vision. Rep. Diana DeGette zeroed in on concerns that NIH scientists could face retaliation for speaking out. She pressed Kennedy to commit, unequivocally, that no disciplinary action would be taken against those who signed a letter questioning his leadership. “It should be an easy answer because it's illegal,” she said. Kennedy insisted his goal was the opposite, that HHS under his direction would “commit that we are absolutely depoliticizing science at NIH for the first time.” Then he slammed the Biden-era politicization of science across all agencies. This is what he was working to rid. “The Biden administration….Ms. Chairwoman, the Biden administration politicized the science and I just gave you three of thousands of examples of how they did that.” But when asked about the letter directly, he said it was the first he’d heard of it.

Kennedy’s plan landed like a thunderclap and the pushback began almost immediately. Not everyone in the room welcomed Kennedy’s vision. Rep. Diana DeGette zeroed in on concerns that NIH scientists could face retaliation for speaking out. She pressed Kennedy to commit, unequivocally, that no disciplinary action would be taken against those who signed a letter questioning his leadership. “It should be an easy answer because it's illegal,” she said. Kennedy insisted his goal was the opposite, that HHS under his direction would “commit that we are absolutely depoliticizing science at NIH for the first time.” Then he slammed the Biden-era politicization of science across all agencies. This is what he was working to rid. “The Biden administration….Ms. Chairwoman, the Biden administration politicized the science and I just gave you three of thousands of examples of how they did that.” But when asked about the letter directly, he said it was the first he’d heard of it.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

255,599 просмотров • 1 год назад

Asmongold on why he hasn't commented much on Denims’ lawsuit and why he hopes she loses "I hope she doesn't win..I didn't really talk about that bc I don't know what the ramifications are..and the only ppl posting about it were the usual glazer accounts so I'm like ok is this legitimate or not..but I think that she should lose" "If u upload somebody else's content with the express and stated goal of trying to deprive that person from revenue, I think that just that on its own..should be grounds for it not to be fair use..fair use is explicitly not being a market alternative and if she is stating that it is a market alternative, then I don't know how anybody could say that's fair use" "That's not a win for anybody if she wins that case..at that point, it says that effectively u can react to and upload another YT video, say that ur doing it to take views away from the creator..fundamentally it was malicious, what she did” “So no I don't want to see somebody win and get off free for something that they literally admitted was malicious..idk why anybody's thinking that's a good thing"

Asmongold on why he hasn't commented much on Denims’ lawsuit and why he hopes she loses "I hope she doesn't win..I didn't really talk about that bc I don't know what the ramifications are..and the only ppl posting about it were the usual glazer accounts so I'm like ok is this legitimate or not..but I think that she should lose" "If u upload somebody else's content with the express and stated goal of trying to deprive that person from revenue, I think that just that on its own..should be grounds for it not to be fair use..fair use is explicitly not being a market alternative and if she is stating that it is a market alternative, then I don't know how anybody could say that's fair use" "That's not a win for anybody if she wins that case..at that point, it says that effectively u can react to and upload another YT video, say that ur doing it to take views away from the creator..fundamentally it was malicious, what she did” “So no I don't want to see somebody win and get off free for something that they literally admitted was malicious..idk why anybody's thinking that's a good thing"

yeet

54,053 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

🔥WOW…Harpole talks about THE SHOT TYLER ROBINSON TOOK that killed Charlie Kirk at UVU on 9/10. "IT IS A VERY SPECIFIC SPOT" - Shawn Ryan Brian Harpole says "He wants to know when he got on the roof. 3 meters to the left & to the right..THERE WAS NO SHOT. DID YOU GET ALL THAT OF GOOGLE?" Shawn Ryan says "IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN REHEARSED." Harpole also says that someone early that day had a drone up but it is not UNCOMMON for the AV team to use a drone. Once again a lot of this goes back to relying on the Chief of UVU and the belief that they had those roofs covered. And like I said that day..how did they know the exact perfect spot for that shot when Charlie NEVER did an event there? When was the tent SETUP? This wasn’t announced to the public under about 8/29..so when did he scout this? Did he go before? How was he lucky enough to know that THE UVU POLICE WOULD NOT cover that staircase. Why didn’t UVU ask for police assistance from Orem PD who are ALLOWED TO FLY DRONES?

Johnny St.Pete

77,483 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

the most detailed and (hopefully) last final story behind members’ fights during the harry potter monthly meeting... 😭 🍒: seungkwan talked about [the fight] on hoshi’s vlog, right? the reason we fought- seungkwan actually said it wrong. i’m telling you seungkwan said it wrong. 🍒: how it went was like this. i still remember that day exactly. i was sitting near the end and i think jun and shua were next to me. and then the manager started asking the kids what they wanted to eat, like steak and various things. so the kids were saying stuff like, ‘just order this and that.’ so we were like, ‘what do you want to eat?’ not about that ‘medium, this and that etc,’ not that. and then they’d say, ↳👤 ‘hyung, mix this with this and this, order it, we’ll share it’ ↳👤 ‘order this!’ ↳👤 ‘order this too’ 🍒: then woozi and vernon said, ‘just eat whatever they order.’ but on the side, someone was talking about what they wanted to eat, saying ‘i want this, i want that,’ you know? so they had things they wanted and were talking about it. ↳👤 ‘ah, i want to eat this too’ ↳👤 ‘let’s order this too!’ ↳👤 ‘oh let’s all share and eat’ ↳ 🍑🐻‍❄️ ‘ah let’s just eat whatever’s ordered’ ‘just eat whatever they give us’ 🍒: and while that was happening, i was coordinating with the manager. so when the friends who weren’t coordinating said things like that, i was already getting irritated. i was already irritated, and it was slowly building up. and then they brought up the grilling- how the meat should be cooked. mingyu probably said it in that same kind of way too, ↳ 🐶 ‘ah let’s just eat it however’ ... and that’s when i got angry at mingyu. 🍒: it wasn’t something trivial. it really wasn’t trivial, i’m telling you. i’m accurate about this [story]. i’m really accurate. mingyu always has that thing where he lands one final hit afterward. 🍒: what’s funny is, if you’re going to say ‘let’s just eat whatever we’re given,’ we shouldn’t have talked about what everyone wants to eat. like, ‘hyung, i want to eat this!’ ‘i want some of this’ and someone else would say, ‘ah just eat whatever’s ordered,’ and i’m over here coordinating intensely with the manager hyung saying, ‘this kid wants this,’ ‘that kid wants this,’ ‘let’s order this too and share it.’ so i got annoyed when they (woozi and vernon) said that. 🍒: ah, i didn’t turn this (live) on because i wanted to talk about this. 🍒: and then afterward, mingyu and i walked together and talked. we cleared it up. mingyu really knows how to push buttons. but honestly, i love mingyu more than anyone.

the most detailed and (hopefully) last final story behind members’ fights during the harry potter monthly meeting... 😭 🍒: seungkwan talked about [the fight] on hoshi’s vlog, right? the reason we fought- seungkwan actually said it wrong. i’m telling you seungkwan said it wrong. 🍒: how it went was like this. i still remember that day exactly. i was sitting near the end and i think jun and shua were next to me. and then the manager started asking the kids what they wanted to eat, like steak and various things. so the kids were saying stuff like, ‘just order this and that.’ so we were like, ‘what do you want to eat?’ not about that ‘medium, this and that etc,’ not that. and then they’d say, ↳👤 ‘hyung, mix this with this and this, order it, we’ll share it’ ↳👤 ‘order this!’ ↳👤 ‘order this too’ 🍒: then woozi and vernon said, ‘just eat whatever they order.’ but on the side, someone was talking about what they wanted to eat, saying ‘i want this, i want that,’ you know? so they had things they wanted and were talking about it. ↳👤 ‘ah, i want to eat this too’ ↳👤 ‘let’s order this too!’ ↳👤 ‘oh let’s all share and eat’ ↳ 🍑🐻‍❄️ ‘ah let’s just eat whatever’s ordered’ ‘just eat whatever they give us’ 🍒: and while that was happening, i was coordinating with the manager. so when the friends who weren’t coordinating said things like that, i was already getting irritated. i was already irritated, and it was slowly building up. and then they brought up the grilling- how the meat should be cooked. mingyu probably said it in that same kind of way too, ↳ 🐶 ‘ah let’s just eat it however’ ... and that’s when i got angry at mingyu. 🍒: it wasn’t something trivial. it really wasn’t trivial, i’m telling you. i’m accurate about this [story]. i’m really accurate. mingyu always has that thing where he lands one final hit afterward. 🍒: what’s funny is, if you’re going to say ‘let’s just eat whatever we’re given,’ we shouldn’t have talked about what everyone wants to eat. like, ‘hyung, i want to eat this!’ ‘i want some of this’ and someone else would say, ‘ah just eat whatever’s ordered,’ and i’m over here coordinating intensely with the manager hyung saying, ‘this kid wants this,’ ‘that kid wants this,’ ‘let’s order this too and share it.’ so i got annoyed when they (woozi and vernon) said that. 🍒: ah, i didn’t turn this (live) on because i wanted to talk about this. 🍒: and then afterward, mingyu and i walked together and talked. we cleared it up. mingyu really knows how to push buttons. but honestly, i love mingyu more than anyone.

디 ૮₍ ˃⤙˂ ₎ა

131,332 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Everyone needs to be aware of this Journalist Avery Daye exposes the history of Minnesota Rep Ilhan Omar “Ilhan Omar — I figured not enough people know about her family’s history, so let’s recap: Her dad and her grandfather were both high-ranking military officials in the Barre regime, which killed over 200,000 people. They’re most famous for the Isaaq genocide — it was the worst of the worst: aerial bombings, executions, man-made famine. People massively suffered under this regime, with the help of people like Ilhan Omar’s family who supported the regime and carried out this, this horror. — They have family ties to this guy known as the Butcher of Hargeisa, and his whole shtick was “kill all but the crows.”” “So the suffering of the people of Somalia was so bad that there was a civil war and the regime was overthrown. Her family fled first to Kenya and then Minnesota, claiming they’re like these asylum seekers. These poor, poor people. No, no, no, no. They were fleeing to escape being held accountable for what they did. She was not oppressed. Her family, they were the oppressors.” “So for the Democratic Party to have her as a representative is insane to me — and the way that they’ve like rebranded her as all this poor refugee? No, no. She wasn’t a refugee of war. Her family created the war.”

Everyone needs to be aware of this Journalist Avery Daye exposes the history of Minnesota Rep Ilhan Omar “Ilhan Omar — I figured not enough people know about her family’s history, so let’s recap: Her dad and her grandfather were both high-ranking military officials in the Barre regime, which killed over 200,000 people. They’re most famous for the Isaaq genocide — it was the worst of the worst: aerial bombings, executions, man-made famine. People massively suffered under this regime, with the help of people like Ilhan Omar’s family who supported the regime and carried out this, this horror. — They have family ties to this guy known as the Butcher of Hargeisa, and his whole shtick was “kill all but the crows.”” “So the suffering of the people of Somalia was so bad that there was a civil war and the regime was overthrown. Her family fled first to Kenya and then Minnesota, claiming they’re like these asylum seekers. These poor, poor people. No, no, no, no. They were fleeing to escape being held accountable for what they did. She was not oppressed. Her family, they were the oppressors.” “So for the Democratic Party to have her as a representative is insane to me — and the way that they’ve like rebranded her as all this poor refugee? No, no. She wasn’t a refugee of war. Her family created the war.”

Wall Street Apes

1,865,758 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад