Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Stop Making Excuses for Radicalism A society that stays silent while vulnerable girls are targeted, exploited, or brutalized is a society that has abandoned its moral duty. Whether it is grooming gangs that prey on children or terrorist groups that weaponize sexual violence, the common denominator is the same:...

11,744 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The Chief Justice is right in stating that sexual offences should and will not be handled in AJS. This a necessary affirmation of the dignity, safety and rights of survivors. Rape, defilement, sodomy and domestic violence are not disputes but crimes. You do not negotiate trauma. You prosecute it. AJS has its place in our justice system, for commercial disputes, neighbourhood conflicts, restorative processes where parties bargain from relatively equal power. But in sexual and gender‑based violence, the power imbalance is structural and brutal. The law cannot tell a survivor to sit across the table from their abuser and bargain away accountability. We have seen the damage when sexual offences are pushed into informal settlements. Silence, intimidation, family agreements that erase the survivor and entrench impunity. Communities are pressured to protect the perpetrator’s name, not the survivor’s future. When the court abdicates to such processes, it abandons its constitutional duty to protect the vulnerable. Saying no AJS for sexual offences is, therefore, a line in the sand. Some harms are so grave that the State must speak, investigate, and prosecute loudly and clearly. Article 27 on equality, Article 28 on human dignity, Article 29 on freedom and security of the person all demand more than compromise, they demand justice. Survivors deserve a courtroom that believes them, not a backroom that bargains them away. #HakiNaImani

Faith Odhiambo

32,751 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen