Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Stop using browser agents. You can use your coding agent to generate deterministic workflows that are 80% faster than browser-use and cost $0 in tokens Completely free & open source at

56,270 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

45 Yorum

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

"what happens when the dom moves?" - libretto prefers making internal API requests where safe & secure. So that makes it even more reliable and simultaneously way faster - for the integrations with legacy portals that we're focused on, the DOM never moves. Those companies are just 90% sales people. - when it does change, you should be in the loop and own that change. For important business-critical automations like filling out tax forms or in healthcare, you want a human reviewing and owning that change. Still, for less critical cases, we'll have an auto-review agent mode soon! Gets 90% of the benefits.

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

also here is the account to follow @libretto_sh

Chet profil fotoğrafı
Chet3 ay önce

@Neesh774 Next stop, Hollywood!

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

@Neesh774 available to hire as an actor

Yigit Tabel profil fotoğrafı
Yigit Tabel3 ay önce

Checking the "public-website-benchmarks.md" file in your Github repo. I saw this benchmark. I got that this is the structure you have in mind: "build automation once → replay cheaply → detect breakage → repair with AI → update automation". My skepticism: For hostile or highly dynamic public websites, Libretto-cached seems fragile to me. For semi-stable authenticated portals, internal dashboards, admin panels, insurance/healthcare portals, vendor portals, and repetitive B2B workflows, it can be very useful. Did you manage libretto to overcome browser security challenges and the other workflow-stopping browser automation blockers?

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

that's fair and thank you for digging into the details! We wanted the benchmark to be easily auditable and reproducible by other people hence the focus on public no-login websites. Libretto workflows by default can solve some security challenges by themselves - if the agents can go through them, they will put it into the workflow code. For more production captchas (Cloudflare, Akamai, Datadome), we recommend running on a cloud platform (like Libretto Cloud, but also Kernel, Steel, Browserbase) that have auto captcha-solving built in. The use-cases you laid out re: admin panels, insurance/healthcare portals, vendor portals, and repetitive B2B workflows is exactly the kinds of workflows we want to be supporting Does that help answer your question?

jia profil fotoğrafı
jia3 ay önce

LFG!! 👑👑 proud of the whole team and this looks awesome

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

thank you!!

Sam Meyer profil fotoğrafı
Sam Meyer3 ay önce

This is the right split. Use the coding agent to generate the boring deterministic path. Save the browser agent for the genuinely ambiguous steps. Otherwise you pay tokens to simulate a script poorly.

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

completely agree!

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

If you want to convert your browser agent to fast, cheap, deterministic code, here's my scheduling link

Rasmus Andersson profil fotoğrafı
Rasmus Andersson3 ay önce

Congrats on launching!

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

thank you rasmus!

Tommy D. Rossi profil fotoğrafı
Tommy D. Rossi3 ay önce

super cool

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

Thanks Tommy! Thank you for building Playwriter, the original source of inspiration

Kyran Tan profil fotoğrafı
Kyran Tan3 ay önce

Super sick! I’m curious about Libretto’s error handling: e.g. if a form throws an error after a field edit, does the workflow recover, or halt? I’ve been building in this space myself (a computer-use framework that turns repetitive tasks into deterministic automations to cut token cost) and I’m really keen to see how you guys approach this.

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

good q. It's just code - by default, if the agent only writes code for the happy path, the workflow will just fail and you'll see the error. When that happens you'll get an email and you'll actually be able to connect to that running session that ran into the error. Once the agent connects to it, it will figure out how to work around the error, you'll be in the loop, it fixes and deploys the updated workflow.

Harsha from Slashy profil fotoğrafı
Harsha from Slashy3 ay önce

Let’s goo

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

thanks man!

Pratyaksh Mishra profil fotoğrafı
Pratyaksh Mishra3 ay önce

Headless interactions are the future

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

@prat_mishra22 completely agree!

nori profil fotoğrafı
nori3 ay önce

yes, browser automation is not the right use case of browser-agent.

Feifan Zhou profil fotoğrafı
Feifan Zhou3 ay önce

do you also run/host the generated workflow?

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

yes! thats our cloud platform. But since its your code you can self host or run on alternative providers.

Nick Venturi profil fotoğrafı
Nick Venturi3 ay önce

watching browser bots click around is stressful

Tia profil fotoğrafı
Tia3 ay önce

This is awesome!!! Let’s go Libretto!!

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

Let's go!!!

José Carlos profil fotoğrafı
José Carlos3 ay önce

@threepointone Hope it brings your gf back

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

@threepointone 🥲🙏🏾

Gail Kronovet profil fotoğrafı
Gail Kronovet3 ay önce

Sounds great!! 🎶🎶

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

Thank you for the support Gail!

Umair Ali profil fotoğrafı
Umair Ali3 ay önce

Super cool stuff mate

Karthik Uppu profil fotoğrafı
Karthik Uppu2 ay önce

This is awesome! Good stuff

abdullh Rabea profil fotoğrafı
abdullh Rabea3 ay önce

Browser agents be like: Son of Anton decided the most efficient way was to delete everything 😂

Mochael profil fotoğrafı
Mochael3 ay önce

Can you explain how this works? What is the open source library

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

🤣

Prakhar profil fotoğrafı
Prakhar3 ay önce

With deterministic scripts, you can see it being fast and cheap unlike when you give the task to an agent I am building something very similar but for os level tasks combining browser+bash+cua agents Would love to talk about this

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

nice! We’re gonna be looking into computer use soon as well.

Aaliya profil fotoğrafı
Aaliya3 ay önce

This is really interesting. Faster workflows are always helpful.

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

completely agree

Neesh 🥭 profil fotoğrafı
Neesh 🥭3 ay önce

YESSSS

Tanishq (tk) profil fotoğrafı
Tanishq (tk)3 ay önce

lets gooooooo

Edgar Magaña profil fotoğrafı
Edgar Magaña2 ay önce

Bro's gonna have massive game after this launch

Vineet Mangal profil fotoğrafı
Vineet Mangal3 ay önce

@tanishqk Nice promo video. Just one question though, what was the purpose of throwing a laptop and then catching it 😅😅😅

Rifad profil fotoğrafı
Rifad3 ay önce

I wrote a post about it. Harness is the way to go

Benzer Videolar