Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Stop varying your rep ranges. There has never been a hypertrophic reason to. There is no fibre in your body that grows better from twenty reps than from five. Not one. Not the soleus, not the "postural" ones, not whatever your calves are supposedly up to. Growth needs a...

SamaHoole's profile picture

Sama Hoole

188,921 subscribers

34,180 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The people telling you 4 to 6 reps for everything are dangerously oversimplifying a complex, individual process. Rep ranges depend on your goals, your genetics and your training history. Here is the properly personalised prescription. - Building muscle: 4 to 6. - Getting strong: 4 to 6. - Toning up: 4 to 6. - Losing fat: 4 to 6. - Fast twitch dominant: 4 to 6. - Slow twitch dominant: 4 to 6. - Long muscle bellies: 4 to 6. - Short muscle bellies: 4 to 6. - Bad knees: 4 to 6. - Started last Tuesday: 4 to 6. - Been at it since 1979: 4 to 6. - Endurance athlete: 4 to 6. - Want your arms to grow: 4 to 6. - Want your legs to catch up: 4 to 6. - Sixty-eight and want to carry the shopping in one trip: 4 to 6. Six years of reading to arrive at that level of nuance.
0:15

The people telling you 4 to 6 reps for everything are dangerously oversimplifying a complex, individual process. Rep ranges depend on your goals, your genetics and your training history. Here is the properly personalised prescription. - Building muscle: 4 to 6. - Getting strong: 4 to 6. - Toning up: 4 to 6. - Losing fat: 4 to 6. - Fast twitch dominant: 4 to 6. - Slow twitch dominant: 4 to 6. - Long muscle bellies: 4 to 6. - Short muscle bellies: 4 to 6. - Bad knees: 4 to 6. - Started last Tuesday: 4 to 6. - Been at it since 1979: 4 to 6. - Endurance athlete: 4 to 6. - Want your arms to grow: 4 to 6. - Want your legs to catch up: 4 to 6. - Sixty-eight and want to carry the shopping in one trip: 4 to 6. Six years of reading to arrive at that level of nuance.

Sama Hoole

40,863 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. It's simply the most efficient way to build muscle.
0:18

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. It's simply the most efficient way to build muscle.

Sama Hoole

1,063,416 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. It's simply the most efficient way to build muscle.
0:12

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. It's simply the most efficient way to build muscle.

Sama Hoole

294,696 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no direct effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. Both ranges can build muscle. The mechanism doesn't care about the rep count. It cares about how close you get to true failure on the reps where the high-threshold motor units are recruited and every available fibre is firing. Those are the stimulating reps. Everything else is filler. The catch with 10-12 is twofold. First, only the last 4-5 reps in a 12-rep set are actually stimulating. The first seven are buffer. They generate fatigue, lactic acid, and joint wear that the muscle has to push through before any growth signal arrives. Effort, yes. Stimulus, no. Second, and this is where the high-rep crowd quietly come undone: the long set produces so much afferent feedback (burning, gasping, the legs giving a small philosophical speech) that almost nobody actually takes the set to true failure. They stop two, three, sometimes four reps short, mistake the discomfort for the limit, and call it a hard set. The stimulating reps they were chasing never showed up. A set of 6 doesn't allow that confusion. Failure is mechanical. The weight either moves or it doesn't. No interpretive dance required. You'll grow on 10-12. You'll grow more on 4-6, with less joint wear, less recovery debt, and considerably less guesswork. One range tolerates your mistakes. The other doesn't have room for them.
0:18

When you train in the 10-12 rep range, most of your reps have no direct effect on growth. When you train in the 4-6 range, virtually all of your reps are growth reps. Both ranges can build muscle. The mechanism doesn't care about the rep count. It cares about how close you get to true failure on the reps where the high-threshold motor units are recruited and every available fibre is firing. Those are the stimulating reps. Everything else is filler. The catch with 10-12 is twofold. First, only the last 4-5 reps in a 12-rep set are actually stimulating. The first seven are buffer. They generate fatigue, lactic acid, and joint wear that the muscle has to push through before any growth signal arrives. Effort, yes. Stimulus, no. Second, and this is where the high-rep crowd quietly come undone: the long set produces so much afferent feedback (burning, gasping, the legs giving a small philosophical speech) that almost nobody actually takes the set to true failure. They stop two, three, sometimes four reps short, mistake the discomfort for the limit, and call it a hard set. The stimulating reps they were chasing never showed up. A set of 6 doesn't allow that confusion. Failure is mechanical. The weight either moves or it doesn't. No interpretive dance required. You'll grow on 10-12. You'll grow more on 4-6, with less joint wear, less recovery debt, and considerably less guesswork. One range tolerates your mistakes. The other doesn't have room for them.

Sama Hoole

63,051 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Been training 4-6 rep range for years on zero carbs. Progressive overload still works. Strength still increases. Muscle still grows. The "carbs fuel workouts" narrative assumes you're doing 12-rep sets to failure with drop sets and supersets. That's not hypertrophy training. That's cardiovascular suffering with weights. Heavy weight, 4-6 reps, sufficient rest between sets: This is almost entirely ATP-PCr system (creatine phosphate), not glycolysis. Your creatine stores are full from eating meat. You have all the fuel needed. Carbs matter for high reps. They're irrelevant when you train properly.
0:18

Been training 4-6 rep range for years on zero carbs. Progressive overload still works. Strength still increases. Muscle still grows. The "carbs fuel workouts" narrative assumes you're doing 12-rep sets to failure with drop sets and supersets. That's not hypertrophy training. That's cardiovascular suffering with weights. Heavy weight, 4-6 reps, sufficient rest between sets: This is almost entirely ATP-PCr system (creatine phosphate), not glycolysis. Your creatine stores are full from eating meat. You have all the fuel needed. Carbs matter for high reps. They're irrelevant when you train properly.

Sama Hoole

35,125 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Rep 7 is the weight telling you it was too light. Rep 10 is you agreeing. Rep 12 is the hypertrophy range, apparently. Rep 15 is cardio. Rep 20 is a hobby. Rep 30 is a cry for help with a dumbbell in it. The muscle only grows on the reps where the bar slows against your will. A heavy set of 5 is 5 of those. A set of 20 is 15 you do to earn 5. You have been paying a 300% tax on your growth reps and calling it volume. Stop at 6. Rest. Go again.
0:18

Rep 7 is the weight telling you it was too light. Rep 10 is you agreeing. Rep 12 is the hypertrophy range, apparently. Rep 15 is cardio. Rep 20 is a hobby. Rep 30 is a cry for help with a dumbbell in it. The muscle only grows on the reps where the bar slows against your will. A heavy set of 5 is 5 of those. A set of 20 is 15 you do to earn 5. You have been paying a 300% tax on your growth reps and calling it volume. Stop at 6. Rest. Go again.

Sama Hoole

11,250 Aufrufe • vor 23 Tagen

4-6 reps: Every rep contributes to mechanical tension 8-12 reps: First 5 reps are a warm-up, last 3 reps actually matter 15-20 reps: Congratulations, you're testing muscular endurance while pretending it's hypertrophy Pick the range where you're not lying to yourself.
0:16

4-6 reps: Every rep contributes to mechanical tension 8-12 reps: First 5 reps are a warm-up, last 3 reps actually matter 15-20 reps: Congratulations, you're testing muscular endurance while pretending it's hypertrophy Pick the range where you're not lying to yourself.

Sama Hoole

307,515 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

You can only grow through the training that you can recover from.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ High reps add undue levels of fatigue, thereby impairing recovery, while offering no additional benefit.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Because anything outside the last 4-5 reps from failure does not stimulate growth, and is therefore superfluous.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ An optimised hypertrophy programme has to factor in fatigue, and it has to attempt to minimise it.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ That's why I recommend 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ It's more efficient, it maximises the stimulus to fatigue ratio, and that can be a gamechanger for people who have been stalling their progress due to impaired recovery.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ This is a very easy theory to test out for yourself.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ - 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ - Straight sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train close to failure.⠀⠀⠀ - Rest 3 minutes between sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train each muscle twice per week.⠀⠀⠀ - Do 2-4 sets per muscle group per session. - Add weight whenever possible.⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Your progress will be the proof.
0:13

You can only grow through the training that you can recover from.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ High reps add undue levels of fatigue, thereby impairing recovery, while offering no additional benefit.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Because anything outside the last 4-5 reps from failure does not stimulate growth, and is therefore superfluous.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ An optimised hypertrophy programme has to factor in fatigue, and it has to attempt to minimise it.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ That's why I recommend 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ It's more efficient, it maximises the stimulus to fatigue ratio, and that can be a gamechanger for people who have been stalling their progress due to impaired recovery.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ This is a very easy theory to test out for yourself.⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ - 4-6 reps.⠀⠀⠀ - Straight sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train close to failure.⠀⠀⠀ - Rest 3 minutes between sets.⠀⠀⠀ - Train each muscle twice per week.⠀⠀⠀ - Do 2-4 sets per muscle group per session. - Add weight whenever possible.⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀ Your progress will be the proof.

Sama Hoole

14,496 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Training a muscle 2-3 times a week in the 4-6 rep range is simply the most effective way to make it grow. - You're minimising fatigue (caused by volume) - Which allows you to maximise the growth stimulus (the last 5 reps from failure) - And recover fast enough to train the muscle in a fresh state in the same week (adding to the growth stimulus) Can you build muscle while ignoring this and just going for the pump? Sure, but it pays to have the right programming if you're not settling for mediocrity.
0:19

Training a muscle 2-3 times a week in the 4-6 rep range is simply the most effective way to make it grow. - You're minimising fatigue (caused by volume) - Which allows you to maximise the growth stimulus (the last 5 reps from failure) - And recover fast enough to train the muscle in a fresh state in the same week (adding to the growth stimulus) Can you build muscle while ignoring this and just going for the pump? Sure, but it pays to have the right programming if you're not settling for mediocrity.

Sama Hoole

23,982 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

Warning: switching to 4 to 6 reps may cause the following. - No pump. You will check the mirror twice on the way out. - Sleeves that fit exactly as they did on the way in. - Nothing sore on Monday, which you will read as going soft. - Grief. Real grief, for the fourteen sets you no longer do. - Then the fidgeting, with nothing left to fill the hour. - Then turning up on Friday in one piece and wanting to be there. - Then finding there is nowhere to hide a lazy rep in a set of five. - Then the weight creeping up on everything without you chasing it. - Then working out that the ache was the bill, not the growth. - Six months, and people start asking what you changed. - Two years, and you have earned the pride of your ancestors. Proceed immediately. Tell nobody.
0:15

Warning: switching to 4 to 6 reps may cause the following. - No pump. You will check the mirror twice on the way out. - Sleeves that fit exactly as they did on the way in. - Nothing sore on Monday, which you will read as going soft. - Grief. Real grief, for the fourteen sets you no longer do. - Then the fidgeting, with nothing left to fill the hour. - Then turning up on Friday in one piece and wanting to be there. - Then finding there is nowhere to hide a lazy rep in a set of five. - Then the weight creeping up on everything without you chasing it. - Then working out that the ache was the bill, not the growth. - Six months, and people start asking what you changed. - Two years, and you have earned the pride of your ancestors. Proceed immediately. Tell nobody.

Sama Hoole

67,629 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Why people are married to high reps: It feels hard. Pump is massive. Heart rate elevated. Sweating. Burning sensation. Soreness next day. All the signals that say "I worked hard." None of them cause growth. 4-6 reps feels different: No pump. Heart rate stays low. Minimal sweating. Less burning. Often not sore. Feels like you didn't work hard enough. But every rep was taken near failure. Every rep contributed to growth. You need to move past that disconnect in order to optimise hypertrophy training. Train to stimulate. Not to be fatigued.
0:11

Why people are married to high reps: It feels hard. Pump is massive. Heart rate elevated. Sweating. Burning sensation. Soreness next day. All the signals that say "I worked hard." None of them cause growth. 4-6 reps feels different: No pump. Heart rate stays low. Minimal sweating. Less burning. Often not sore. Feels like you didn't work hard enough. But every rep was taken near failure. Every rep contributed to growth. You need to move past that disconnect in order to optimise hypertrophy training. Train to stimulate. Not to be fatigued.

Sama Hoole

683,326 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

And there is a first time for everything... After #2 Charlotte Catholic scores 4 in the top of the 7th to take a 8-4 lead, the game is called with 1 out in the bottom half due to a drop dead time limit. We think the final score is below.... Final in 6 innings #2 Charlotte Catholic Baseball - 4 # 12 Cuthbertson Baseball - 6
0:11

And there is a first time for everything... After #2 Charlotte Catholic scores 4 in the top of the 7th to take a 8-4 lead, the game is called with 1 out in the bottom half due to a drop dead time limit. We think the final score is below.... Final in 6 innings #2 Charlotte Catholic Baseball - 4 # 12 Cuthbertson Baseball - 6

Prep Baseball NC

57,572 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

What people think 8-12 reps does: - Hits the magic "hypertrophy sweet spot" - Maximises growth through ideal time under tension - Builds more than heavy low reps ever could - Is the scientifically optimal range What 8-12 reps actually does: - Buries the few stimulating reps under a pile of easy ones - Forces a lighter weight, so less tension where it counts - Generates far more fatigue for the same growth - Makes progress harder to track, since "add a rep" is fuzzier than "add a kilo" - Quietly trains you to avoid weights heavy enough to test yourself The growth happens in the last few hard reps near failure. Heavy 4-6 gives you those immediately, with none of the padding. 8-12 isn't useless. It's just the long way round to less.
0:17

What people think 8-12 reps does: - Hits the magic "hypertrophy sweet spot" - Maximises growth through ideal time under tension - Builds more than heavy low reps ever could - Is the scientifically optimal range What 8-12 reps actually does: - Buries the few stimulating reps under a pile of easy ones - Forces a lighter weight, so less tension where it counts - Generates far more fatigue for the same growth - Makes progress harder to track, since "add a rep" is fuzzier than "add a kilo" - Quietly trains you to avoid weights heavy enough to test yourself The growth happens in the last few hard reps near failure. Heavy 4-6 gives you those immediately, with none of the padding. 8-12 isn't useless. It's just the long way round to less.

Sama Hoole

32,030 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

"I only got 3 reps. I should have gone lighter." This is the most common mistake in the gym. Heavy set, three productive reps, and the lifter walks away thinking they failed. What actually happened: - The first three reps were near maximal motor unit recruitment - High threshold fibres were doing the work - The set ended where the stimulus ended - No fatigue reps were tacked on the back - No junk volume to recover from before next session What didn't happen: - You did not ego lift - You did not waste a set - You did not need to drop the weight by 10kg and grind out twelve The 4-6 rep set has a maximum of five productive reps before fatigue starts compromising the quality. Getting three is 60% of the available stimulus in that range, delivered clean. The lifter next to you doing 12 reps to mild discomfort thinks they had a great set. They got two stimulating reps at best, buried under ten reps of submaximal warm-up under load. You got three. They got two. Add a little weight next session. Try for four. Hit three again, you're still ahead of where the high-rep crowd will ever be.
0:14

"I only got 3 reps. I should have gone lighter." This is the most common mistake in the gym. Heavy set, three productive reps, and the lifter walks away thinking they failed. What actually happened: - The first three reps were near maximal motor unit recruitment - High threshold fibres were doing the work - The set ended where the stimulus ended - No fatigue reps were tacked on the back - No junk volume to recover from before next session What didn't happen: - You did not ego lift - You did not waste a set - You did not need to drop the weight by 10kg and grind out twelve The 4-6 rep set has a maximum of five productive reps before fatigue starts compromising the quality. Getting three is 60% of the available stimulus in that range, delivered clean. The lifter next to you doing 12 reps to mild discomfort thinks they had a great set. They got two stimulating reps at best, buried under ten reps of submaximal warm-up under load. You got three. They got two. Add a little weight next session. Try for four. Hit three again, you're still ahead of where the high-rep crowd will ever be.

Sama Hoole

149,400 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 Beyoncé is CONFIRMED to perform during Jay’s 9/4 London show but it’s not for the reason you think! First of all, let’s focus on the location: London. Why London on his wife’s birthday? Because it has 6 letters. L-O-N-D-O-N. Boom, 6. Remember Jay’s recent interview when he randomly brought up 6 Inch? This was foreshadowing! 9/4/26 also gives us a major clue. 9+4=13. 2+6=8. What’s 13-8? 5. But we have to add 1 because London is 1 city. Boom, now we’re at 6. The Carters are dropping an official 6 Inch remix and performing it together for the first time at this show! CONFIRMED!
0:12

🚨 Beyoncé is CONFIRMED to perform during Jay’s 9/4 London show but it’s not for the reason you think! First of all, let’s focus on the location: London. Why London on his wife’s birthday? Because it has 6 letters. L-O-N-D-O-N. Boom, 6. Remember Jay’s recent interview when he randomly brought up 6 Inch? This was foreshadowing! 9/4/26 also gives us a major clue. 9+4=13. 2+6=8. What’s 13-8? 5. But we have to add 1 because London is 1 city. Boom, now we’re at 6. The Carters are dropping an official 6 Inch remix and performing it together for the first time at this show! CONFIRMED!

Allie

225,121 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

There is not a muscle on the body that needs high reps to see its best growth. This is basic physiology. Yes, muscles vary in their ratio of slow to fast twitch fibres. It doesn't matter, for two reasons: 1. Slow twitch fibres reach their ceiling early. They are not the limiting factor. 2. As you approach failure, every fibre is recruited regardless. The body does not leave capacity sitting idle when it thinks it's about to fail. Here is what actually drives hypertrophy: involuntary slow contractions. The point in a set where the concentric is grinding, the bar speed is dropping, and the muscle is being forced to recruit everything it has just to complete the rep. That is mechanical tension. That is the growth signal. It only exists in the final five or so reps before failure. Everything before that is your body coasting on the fibres it was already using. Some muscles tolerate high reps better than others. Calves are the classic example. But tolerating junk reps is not the same as benefiting from them. It just means the damage is less visible. The reps are still junk. If you are living in the 8-plus rep range, most of your set is happening nowhere near that zone of involuntary contraction. You are accumulating fatigue, impairing recovery, reducing training frequency, and spending more time under the bar: in exchange for a growth stimulus you could have captured in a fraction of the reps. More reps past the point of failure proximity is not more stimulus. It is just more cost.
0:12

There is not a muscle on the body that needs high reps to see its best growth. This is basic physiology. Yes, muscles vary in their ratio of slow to fast twitch fibres. It doesn't matter, for two reasons: 1. Slow twitch fibres reach their ceiling early. They are not the limiting factor. 2. As you approach failure, every fibre is recruited regardless. The body does not leave capacity sitting idle when it thinks it's about to fail. Here is what actually drives hypertrophy: involuntary slow contractions. The point in a set where the concentric is grinding, the bar speed is dropping, and the muscle is being forced to recruit everything it has just to complete the rep. That is mechanical tension. That is the growth signal. It only exists in the final five or so reps before failure. Everything before that is your body coasting on the fibres it was already using. Some muscles tolerate high reps better than others. Calves are the classic example. But tolerating junk reps is not the same as benefiting from them. It just means the damage is less visible. The reps are still junk. If you are living in the 8-plus rep range, most of your set is happening nowhere near that zone of involuntary contraction. You are accumulating fatigue, impairing recovery, reducing training frequency, and spending more time under the bar: in exchange for a growth stimulus you could have captured in a fraction of the reps. More reps past the point of failure proximity is not more stimulus. It is just more cost.

Sama Hoole

15,967 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

People get genuinely emotional when you suggest low reps build muscle better. Not "equally well." BETTER. Why? Because they've invested years into high-rep training and the cognitive dissonance is unbearable. Admitting that 4-6 reps is superior means admitting they've spent years accumulating unnecessary fatigue and making slower progress than they could have. It's easier to get angry at the messenger than accept the message. I get it. Nobody wants to hear they've been doing it wrong. But the alternative is continuing to do it wrong for another 5 years while defending your suboptimal approach to strangers on the internet. Pride or progress. Choose one.
0:19

People get genuinely emotional when you suggest low reps build muscle better. Not "equally well." BETTER. Why? Because they've invested years into high-rep training and the cognitive dissonance is unbearable. Admitting that 4-6 reps is superior means admitting they've spent years accumulating unnecessary fatigue and making slower progress than they could have. It's easier to get angry at the messenger than accept the message. I get it. Nobody wants to hear they've been doing it wrong. But the alternative is continuing to do it wrong for another 5 years while defending your suboptimal approach to strangers on the internet. Pride or progress. Choose one.

Sama Hoole

40,146 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

High reps do nothing special for muscle growth. People want them to, because high reps feel like work. But every reason given for their magic falls apart on contact. "Better pump." The pump is blood and fluid, gone within the hour. A sensation, never a stimulus. It builds nothing. "More time under tension." More time, yes, under less tension, because the weight had to be lighter. Time never drove growth. Tension does. "More metabolic stress." Never convincingly shown to build muscle alone. They infused lactate into training humans and the signal did not move. "The burn." Just metabolites pooling. It tells you the muscle is working to fuel itself, not that it is growing one bit. "More fibre recruitment." Only in the last few reps near failure. You grind fifteen reps for the handful a heavy five hands you instantly. "Kinder to the joints." Sometimes, less load per rep. But far more reps means more grinding under fatigue, and its own strain injuries. Strip it back and high reps grow muscle the same way low reps do: hard reps near failure, generating tension. They just cost far more work and fatigue to get there. Nothing special. Just longer, sweatier, and more tiring for the same result.
0:17

High reps do nothing special for muscle growth. People want them to, because high reps feel like work. But every reason given for their magic falls apart on contact. "Better pump." The pump is blood and fluid, gone within the hour. A sensation, never a stimulus. It builds nothing. "More time under tension." More time, yes, under less tension, because the weight had to be lighter. Time never drove growth. Tension does. "More metabolic stress." Never convincingly shown to build muscle alone. They infused lactate into training humans and the signal did not move. "The burn." Just metabolites pooling. It tells you the muscle is working to fuel itself, not that it is growing one bit. "More fibre recruitment." Only in the last few reps near failure. You grind fifteen reps for the handful a heavy five hands you instantly. "Kinder to the joints." Sometimes, less load per rep. But far more reps means more grinding under fatigue, and its own strain injuries. Strip it back and high reps grow muscle the same way low reps do: hard reps near failure, generating tension. They just cost far more work and fatigue to get there. Nothing special. Just longer, sweatier, and more tiring for the same result.

Sama Hoole

29,170 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The "8-12 reps for hypertrophy" myth exists because enhanced bodybuilders grow from anything. Before the 1960s steroid era, everyone trained heavy: 4-6 reps, compound lifts, progressive overload. Then steroids arrived. Suddenly bodybuilders could do 20-set arm workouts with drop sets and supersets and still grow because the drugs were doing the work. They attributed their growth to the high-volume, high-rep training. They were wrong. They were growing from the testosterone, trenbolone, and dianabol. But naturals saw them training this way and copied it. Result: Decades of natural lifters doing enhanced protocols and wondering why they're not growing. The 8-12 rep range isn't wrong. It's just suboptimal compared to 4-6. Whether you're natural or enhanced. Enhanced lifters can grow from literally anything because they grow INDEPENDENT of training. Natural lifters need every advantage. Heavy weight, low reps, maximum tension. Stop copying drug users. Their rules don't apply to you.
0:14

The "8-12 reps for hypertrophy" myth exists because enhanced bodybuilders grow from anything. Before the 1960s steroid era, everyone trained heavy: 4-6 reps, compound lifts, progressive overload. Then steroids arrived. Suddenly bodybuilders could do 20-set arm workouts with drop sets and supersets and still grow because the drugs were doing the work. They attributed their growth to the high-volume, high-rep training. They were wrong. They were growing from the testosterone, trenbolone, and dianabol. But naturals saw them training this way and copied it. Result: Decades of natural lifters doing enhanced protocols and wondering why they're not growing. The 8-12 rep range isn't wrong. It's just suboptimal compared to 4-6. Whether you're natural or enhanced. Enhanced lifters can grow from literally anything because they grow INDEPENDENT of training. Natural lifters need every advantage. Heavy weight, low reps, maximum tension. Stop copying drug users. Their rules don't apply to you.

Sama Hoole

558,120 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten