正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Strategy, amplified.

Michael Saylor

5,198,191 subscribers

2,160,519 次观看 • 13 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术教育财经

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

#Bitcoin is Digital Capital. $STRC is Digital Credit. Strategy is Amplified Bitcoin. FOX Business Liz Claman

#Bitcoin is Digital Capital. $STRC is Digital Credit. Strategy is Amplified Bitcoin. FOX Business Liz Claman

Phong Le

195,585 次观看 • 6 个月前

When $BTC is up, $MSTR tends to go up more because it provides amplified exposure to bitcoin.

When $BTC is up, $MSTR tends to go up more because it provides amplified exposure to bitcoin.

Strategy

40,712 次观看 • 13 天前

"We have outperformed Bitcoin by 50% in the last six years. And we have outperformed every company in the MAG7 except for NVIDIA" Strategy CEO Phong Le on what the market is getting wrong about Strategy "If you believe in Bitcoin, we are amplified Bitcoin"

"We have outperformed Bitcoin by 50% in the last six years. And we have outperformed every company in the MAG7 except for NVIDIA" Strategy CEO Phong Le on what the market is getting wrong about Strategy "If you believe in Bitcoin, we are amplified Bitcoin"

The Wolf Of All Streets

20,556 次观看 • 2 个月前

RIPPLE CEO: MICHAEL SAYLOR'S STRATEGY HURT THE MARKET 👀 Brad Garlinghouse says using leverage to buy more Bitcoin amplified the recent selloff. His view -- long-term value comes from utility, not financial engineering.

RIPPLE CEO: MICHAEL SAYLOR'S STRATEGY HURT THE MARKET 👀 Brad Garlinghouse says using leverage to buy more Bitcoin amplified the recent selloff. His view -- long-term value comes from utility, not financial engineering.

CryptosRus

19,280 次观看 • 2 个月前

The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to STRC + MSTR Is Strategy running a ponzi scheme? No. This is video, I take an objective, no-nonsense approach to explaining STRC, MSTR, and the risks behind both. I go into detail of Strategy's strategy so your grandma can understand this perfectly. Whether you want to get paid 11.5% annual dividends, paid monthly with STRC... ...or you want amplified Bitcoin exposure via MSTR. This is the ultimate beginner's guide to understanding Strategy:

The Ultimate Beginner's Guide to STRC + MSTR Is Strategy running a ponzi scheme? No. This is video, I take an objective, no-nonsense approach to explaining STRC, MSTR, and the risks behind both. I go into detail of Strategy's strategy so your grandma can understand this perfectly. Whether you want to get paid 11.5% annual dividends, paid monthly with STRC... ...or you want amplified Bitcoin exposure via MSTR. This is the ultimate beginner's guide to understanding Strategy:

Adam Livingston

211,891 次观看 • 4 个月前

STRATEGY TO THE S&P 500 BECAUSE IT'S INEVITABLE Everyone thinks MSTR’s S&P 500 path is just “Bitcoin goes up, number goes up.” Wrong. This is about Strategy turning from a deranged Bitcoin trebuchet into an institutionally legible capital markets weapon. GAAP profitability. Convertible debt cleanup. USD liquidity reserves. Passive index flows. And the hilarious possibility that the world’s most boring retirement portfolios may eventually be forced to own amplified Bitcoin exposure in a suit and tie. STRATEGY WORLD DOMINATION IS INEVITABLE:

STRATEGY TO THE S&P 500 BECAUSE IT'S INEVITABLE Everyone thinks MSTR’s S&P 500 path is just “Bitcoin goes up, number goes up.” Wrong. This is about Strategy turning from a deranged Bitcoin trebuchet into an institutionally legible capital markets weapon. GAAP profitability. Convertible debt cleanup. USD liquidity reserves. Passive index flows. And the hilarious possibility that the world’s most boring retirement portfolios may eventually be forced to own amplified Bitcoin exposure in a suit and tie. STRATEGY WORLD DOMINATION IS INEVITABLE:

Adam Livingston

41,875 次观看 • 2 个月前

This is exactly why Sengottayan is a master addition to TVK. 🔥 He’s not just campaigning, he’s demonstrating how a real ground operation should be run, setting a template for the young forces to follow. Strategy. Structure. Street connect. This is how the Vijay wave gets amplified on the ground. 🔥💥

This is exactly why Sengottayan is a master addition to TVK. 🔥 He’s not just campaigning, he’s demonstrating how a real ground operation should be run, setting a template for the young forces to follow. Strategy. Structure. Street connect. This is how the Vijay wave gets amplified on the ground. 🔥💥

Navaneeth

61,276 次观看 • 6 个月前

Western interference in Iran has entered a new phase, one that no longer relies solely on sanctions or diplomacy, but on a coordinated blend of digital manipulation and violence on the ground. In tonight's episode of Demystifying Iran, Seyed Mohammad Marandi unpacks how this model of hybrid warfare operates across media platforms, armed groups, and cyberspace, and why its apparent online momentum masks deeper structural weaknesses. Behind the trending and constructed narratives and amplified chaos, the episode raises a critical question: Will the West ever realize that its hybrid warfare strategy is doomed to fail, as it is fundamentally disconnected from realities inside Iran? Watch the full episode here: Seyed Mohammad Marandi #DemystifyingIran #Iran #IranRiots #Politics #AlMayadeen

Western interference in Iran has entered a new phase, one that no longer relies solely on sanctions or diplomacy, but on a coordinated blend of digital manipulation and violence on the ground. In tonight's episode of Demystifying Iran, Seyed Mohammad Marandi unpacks how this model of hybrid warfare operates across media platforms, armed groups, and cyberspace, and why its apparent online momentum masks deeper structural weaknesses. Behind the trending and constructed narratives and amplified chaos, the episode raises a critical question: Will the West ever realize that its hybrid warfare strategy is doomed to fail, as it is fundamentally disconnected from realities inside Iran? Watch the full episode here: Seyed Mohammad Marandi #DemystifyingIran #Iran #IranRiots #Politics #AlMayadeen

Al Mayadeen English

77,296 次观看 • 7 个月前

MSTR Shareholder Questions Strategy: I Bought $73K MSTR for My Kids. Now It’s Worth $20K At Strategy's Q2 2026 investor Q&A, livestreamed on Aug. 17, a shareholder said he had invested $73,000 in MSTR for each of his three children, that each investment is now worth only about $20,000, and asked whether the company would consider paying a dividend to common shareholders. CEO Phong Le responded that the company will not pay a common-stock dividend on MSTR, saying it is not the best use of capital. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor said MSTR is essentially an amplified Bitcoin exposure with volatility likely well above Bitcoin itself, and that common-stock investors should have at least a four-year holding horizon — ideally seven to ten years.

MSTR Shareholder Questions Strategy: I Bought $73K MSTR for My Kids. Now It’s Worth $20K At Strategy's Q2 2026 investor Q&A, livestreamed on Aug. 17, a shareholder said he had invested $73,000 in MSTR for each of his three children, that each investment is now worth only about $20,000, and asked whether the company would consider paying a dividend to common shareholders. CEO Phong Le responded that the company will not pay a common-stock dividend on MSTR, saying it is not the best use of capital. Executive Chairman Michael Saylor said MSTR is essentially an amplified Bitcoin exposure with volatility likely well above Bitcoin itself, and that common-stock investors should have at least a four-year holding horizon — ideally seven to ten years.

Wu Blockchain

16,141 次观看 • 14 天前

Digital credit is only a year old, which makes clear explanations & institutional risk framing essential. Nate Geraci asked the tough questions on digital credit, $SATA, $ASST, the $BTC drawdown & more. My full conversation on Crypto Prime. TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Intro: Matt Cole on Strive and SATA 01:09 Strive’s shift into structured finance 02:44 ASST vs. SATA: amplified Bitcoin exposure vs. digital credit 07:28 What SATA is and how the preferred equity works 10:12 Why Strive calls SATA “digital credit” 13:32 Credit risk, Bitcoin drawdowns, and Strive’s reserves 17:46 Bitcoin return scenarios and SATA dividend sustainability 20:25 Bitcoin as collateral vs. cash-flowing assets 25:08 Does a 13% dividend mean higher risk? 29:47 How digital credit should be marketed 34:30 SATA vs. Strategy’s Stretch 36:25 Strategy, Michael Saylor, and Bitcoin’s market narrative 41:04 Why Bitcoin has drawn down 43:02 AI, IPOs, and capital flowing away from Bitcoin 43:44 OG Bitcoin holder selling pressure 47:20 What could bring Bitcoin momentum back 50:43 Closing thoughts

Digital credit is only a year old, which makes clear explanations & institutional risk framing essential. Nate Geraci asked the tough questions on digital credit, $SATA, $ASST, the $BTC drawdown & more. My full conversation on Crypto Prime. TIMESTAMPS 00:00 Intro: Matt Cole on Strive and SATA 01:09 Strive’s shift into structured finance 02:44 ASST vs. SATA: amplified Bitcoin exposure vs. digital credit 07:28 What SATA is and how the preferred equity works 10:12 Why Strive calls SATA “digital credit” 13:32 Credit risk, Bitcoin drawdowns, and Strive’s reserves 17:46 Bitcoin return scenarios and SATA dividend sustainability 20:25 Bitcoin as collateral vs. cash-flowing assets 25:08 Does a 13% dividend mean higher risk? 29:47 How digital credit should be marketed 34:30 SATA vs. Strategy’s Stretch 36:25 Strategy, Michael Saylor, and Bitcoin’s market narrative 41:04 Why Bitcoin has drawn down 43:02 AI, IPOs, and capital flowing away from Bitcoin 43:44 OG Bitcoin holder selling pressure 47:20 What could bring Bitcoin momentum back 50:43 Closing thoughts

Matt Cole

19,386 次观看 • 2 个月前

Virtual stream with threadguy today considering "the full implications of Michael Saylor being right" I break down $STRC & $SATA from a basic level. - How'd we get here - How does this work - How to think about these instruments - How much capital can buy these? Tune in: 0:50 – Intro 1:48 – Reinsurance to Bitcoin treasury 4:56 – BTC Treasury history, post-2021 unwind 7:42 – Perpetual preferred equity launch (STRK/STRC) 10:44 – High yields (11.5–12.75%) vs. bank preferreds 13:37 – Underwriting Bitcoin, long-term 25–45% CAGR 15:21 – Backtesting the yield model; excess risk/return 19:37 – Liquidity advantage $STRC trades 100x+ more than JPM 22:43 – Targeting trillions in fixed-income capital 25:58 – Low dividend-risk probability vs. credit market 28:30 – Preferred = low-vol BTC; common = high-vol/amplified BTC 30:08 – High volume enabling ATM liquidity 36:32 – Strive lower leverage (1%) vs. Strategy (12%) 39:03 – Capital raising & maintaining credit profile 41:37 – Massive TAM (200–300T fixed income) 43:41 – Host recap: cool product, new capital access thesis

Jeff Walton

44,123 次观看 • 5 个月前

The mask is off. In a stunning admission, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink boasts of a global business model built on unprecedented access and influence over the highest levels of government—before they even take power. His words reveal a chilling blueprint: leverage control over the retirement funds of nations (from Mexico to Japan to the UK) to position BlackRock as an indispensable "partner." Then, systematically court political candidates, not as a constituent, but as a global financier securing access and influence regardless of who wins. Now, as a new co-chairman of the World Economic Forum, Fink’s influence is set to be formalized and amplified. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's a corporate leader openly describing a strategy to shape policy and governance from the top down. The fusion of mega-finance (BlackRock), globalist governance (WEF), and political pre-selection is the defining threat to national sovereignty and democratic integrity in our time. This is the unelected engine of the "stakeholder capitalism" machine. It’s not investment. It’s infiltration.

The mask is off. In a stunning admission, BlackRock CEO Larry Fink boasts of a global business model built on unprecedented access and influence over the highest levels of government—before they even take power. His words reveal a chilling blueprint: leverage control over the retirement funds of nations (from Mexico to Japan to the UK) to position BlackRock as an indispensable "partner." Then, systematically court political candidates, not as a constituent, but as a global financier securing access and influence regardless of who wins. Now, as a new co-chairman of the World Economic Forum, Fink’s influence is set to be formalized and amplified. This isn't conspiracy theory; it's a corporate leader openly describing a strategy to shape policy and governance from the top down. The fusion of mega-finance (BlackRock), globalist governance (WEF), and political pre-selection is the defining threat to national sovereignty and democratic integrity in our time. This is the unelected engine of the "stakeholder capitalism" machine. It’s not investment. It’s infiltration.

Camus

802,858 次观看 • 11 个月前

Bitcoin treasury companies are evolving FAST. In this conversation with Joe Burnett, MSBA, we discussed: • Why digital credit $STRC $SATA could be Bitcoin’s next major catalyst • How Strive $ASST is becoming one of Bitcoin’s most important treasury companies • Michael Saylor’s latest move with Strategy $MSTR • Why altcoins may struggle going forward • The rise of “amplified Bitcoin” • How Bitcoin-backed yield products could reshape Wall Street • Why Bitcoin could eventually reach $1.6M One of the biggest takeaways: Bitcoin is no longer just an asset: an entire financial system is being built on top of it. This feels a lot like Bitcoin in 2015… most people still don’t understand what’s coming. 00:00 Joe Burnett's Journey into Bitcoin 06:42 What Joe Burnett Actually Does at Strive 07:53 Why Strive Is Moving Faster Than Every Other Bitcoin Treasury Company 13:09 Strategy’s Shocking New Bitcoin Selling Plan Explained 19:06 The Most Important Takeaway from Strategy’s Earnings Call 25:18 Why Altcoins May Never Recover Against Bitcoin 28:11 Why Debt Is Dangerous for Bitcoin Treasury Companies 30:43 “The World Will Change This Week” — What Is Strive Building? 31:44 Strive’s New Digital Credit ETF Explained 34:31 Joe Burnett Reacts to Jeff Walton vs Coffeezilla 39:07 The Insurance Analogy That Changed the Debate 43:07 Which Bitcoin Treasury Companies Actually Matter? 47:58 Will Digital Credit Replace the 60/40 Portfolio? 52:17 Could Digital Credit Dividend Rates Stay High Forever? 57:58 Why Joe Thinks Bitcoin Is Entering a Historic New Era Full episode 👇

Bitcoin treasury companies are evolving FAST. In this conversation with Joe Burnett, MSBA, we discussed: • Why digital credit $STRC $SATA could be Bitcoin’s next major catalyst • How Strive $ASST is becoming one of Bitcoin’s most important treasury companies • Michael Saylor’s latest move with Strategy $MSTR • Why altcoins may struggle going forward • The rise of “amplified Bitcoin” • How Bitcoin-backed yield products could reshape Wall Street • Why Bitcoin could eventually reach $1.6M One of the biggest takeaways: Bitcoin is no longer just an asset: an entire financial system is being built on top of it. This feels a lot like Bitcoin in 2015… most people still don’t understand what’s coming. 00:00 Joe Burnett's Journey into Bitcoin 06:42 What Joe Burnett Actually Does at Strive 07:53 Why Strive Is Moving Faster Than Every Other Bitcoin Treasury Company 13:09 Strategy’s Shocking New Bitcoin Selling Plan Explained 19:06 The Most Important Takeaway from Strategy’s Earnings Call 25:18 Why Altcoins May Never Recover Against Bitcoin 28:11 Why Debt Is Dangerous for Bitcoin Treasury Companies 30:43 “The World Will Change This Week” — What Is Strive Building? 31:44 Strive’s New Digital Credit ETF Explained 34:31 Joe Burnett Reacts to Jeff Walton vs Coffeezilla 39:07 The Insurance Analogy That Changed the Debate 43:07 Which Bitcoin Treasury Companies Actually Matter? 47:58 Will Digital Credit Replace the 60/40 Portfolio? 52:17 Could Digital Credit Dividend Rates Stay High Forever? 57:58 Why Joe Thinks Bitcoin Is Entering a Historic New Era Full episode 👇

One Chair

15,547 次观看 • 3 个月前

🚨 DJE MEDIA SEX OFFENDER WITH CAMERA 🚨 Interesting development: at speakers corner BIG UPPPP Wendall 🔥🔥 as more and more established citizen journalists are now addressing the situation - noticeably without naming names - following the Manchester Evening News investigation. That alone speaks volumes. When multiple independent voices avoid naming someone but still critique the behaviour, the edits, and the ethics, it’s usually because the reporting already did the heavy lifting. Integrity doesn’t disappear overnight - it reveals itself under scrutiny. What was shocking wasn’t the article. It was the so-called “explanation.” An explanation that was monetised. An explanation that earned revenue. An explanation complaining about journalism being behind a paywall… while simultaneously profiting from the controversy. That’s not irony - that’s hypocrisy with ads enabled. Journalists did what journalists are supposed to do: report on matters already in the public domain, supported by court records and public interest. Calling that “milking it” while personally cashing in on the fallout is a bold strategy. For clarity: the MEN investigation references a decade-long SHPO. That’s not speculation. That’s reported history. If your defence collapses the moment people point out the money trail, the selective edits, and the missing context - the issue isn’t the press, the audience, or “haters.” It’s credibility. Funny how accountability is always “coming soon,” but premieres never stop. Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 covering the wider issue on YouTube and Wendell Daniels openly commentating on it has only amplified what many were already questioning: integrity, editing, and motive. When people with very different audiences arrive at the same concerns independently, it’s not a “pile-on” - it’s convergence.

🚨 DJE MEDIA SEX OFFENDER WITH CAMERA 🚨 Interesting development: at speakers corner BIG UPPPP Wendall 🔥🔥 as more and more established citizen journalists are now addressing the situation - noticeably without naming names - following the Manchester Evening News investigation. That alone speaks volumes. When multiple independent voices avoid naming someone but still critique the behaviour, the edits, and the ethics, it’s usually because the reporting already did the heavy lifting. Integrity doesn’t disappear overnight - it reveals itself under scrutiny. What was shocking wasn’t the article. It was the so-called “explanation.” An explanation that was monetised. An explanation that earned revenue. An explanation complaining about journalism being behind a paywall… while simultaneously profiting from the controversy. That’s not irony - that’s hypocrisy with ads enabled. Journalists did what journalists are supposed to do: report on matters already in the public domain, supported by court records and public interest. Calling that “milking it” while personally cashing in on the fallout is a bold strategy. For clarity: the MEN investigation references a decade-long SHPO. That’s not speculation. That’s reported history. If your defence collapses the moment people point out the money trail, the selective edits, and the missing context - the issue isn’t the press, the audience, or “haters.” It’s credibility. Funny how accountability is always “coming soon,” but premieres never stop. Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 covering the wider issue on YouTube and Wendell Daniels openly commentating on it has only amplified what many were already questioning: integrity, editing, and motive. When people with very different audiences arrive at the same concerns independently, it’s not a “pile-on” - it’s convergence.

Toni The Truth Troll 😈💚😝

14,475 次观看 • 8 个月前

Bret Weinstein issues a critical challenge to the prevailing narrative on vaccine safety and policy, framing it as a fundamental failure of cost-benefit analysis and public health strategy. He argues that all current vaccine platforms carry significant, unique defects, mandating a position of extreme caution. The central question is not if a vaccine can be made, but when a disease is serious enough—and a vaccine safe enough—to justify its use. Weinstein dissects the measles example: while dangerous in a modern context, its threat is amplified by the population's underlying poor health. This vulnerability forces a tragic choice—use a potentially harmful vaccine to limit immediate damage, but at a massive long-term cost. The true solution, he contends, isn't perpetual vaccination but restoring population health so diseases like measles become manageable again. The goal isn't to prevent infection entirely, but to ensure robust health outcomes when infection occurs. He then highlights the catastrophic flaw in the system: the absence of properly controlled studies. Without them, we cannot possibly compare the lives lost to a disease like measles (perhaps 200/year in the U.S.) versus the lives lost or damaged by vaccine-related harms, such as adjuvants triggering fatal allergies or asthma. His verdict: A vaccine is only valid if it demonstrates a net benefit in a rigorous, controlled study that measures all-cause mortality. Until such studies are conducted and transparently reviewed, the public is being asked to accept a medical intervention without knowing its true cost. The current model, he warns, prioritizes a short-term fix over long-term health, and we are all paying the price.

Bret Weinstein issues a critical challenge to the prevailing narrative on vaccine safety and policy, framing it as a fundamental failure of cost-benefit analysis and public health strategy. He argues that all current vaccine platforms carry significant, unique defects, mandating a position of extreme caution. The central question is not if a vaccine can be made, but when a disease is serious enough—and a vaccine safe enough—to justify its use. Weinstein dissects the measles example: while dangerous in a modern context, its threat is amplified by the population's underlying poor health. This vulnerability forces a tragic choice—use a potentially harmful vaccine to limit immediate damage, but at a massive long-term cost. The true solution, he contends, isn't perpetual vaccination but restoring population health so diseases like measles become manageable again. The goal isn't to prevent infection entirely, but to ensure robust health outcomes when infection occurs. He then highlights the catastrophic flaw in the system: the absence of properly controlled studies. Without them, we cannot possibly compare the lives lost to a disease like measles (perhaps 200/year in the U.S.) versus the lives lost or damaged by vaccine-related harms, such as adjuvants triggering fatal allergies or asthma. His verdict: A vaccine is only valid if it demonstrates a net benefit in a rigorous, controlled study that measures all-cause mortality. Until such studies are conducted and transparently reviewed, the public is being asked to accept a medical intervention without knowing its true cost. The current model, he warns, prioritizes a short-term fix over long-term health, and we are all paying the price.

Camus

59,857 次观看 • 11 个月前

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

The Extraordinary Grandiosity of Meghan Markle. The disconnect in this interview is astonishing. Meghan says she already had influence during her time on Suits. She talks about people monetising what she wore and how intentional she was in using fashion to elevate brands and designers, almost presenting herself as someone uniquely thoughtful about the opportunities clothing gave her. And somehow, throughout all of it, there is barely any acknowledgement that marrying into one of the most famous institutions in the world might have had something to do with the level of attention she received. Instead, the story becomes: Meghan had the influence. Meghan elevated brands. People monetised Meghan. Meghan used fashion strategically. Meghan was the phenomenon all along. She genuinely believes the influence was always hers. The sheer narcissism of it is astonishing. The constant rewriting of the narrative so that Meghan is always the benefactor rather than the beneficiary, always the one elevating others rather than the one being elevated, is frankly laughable. Royal women have long understood that what they wear sends a message. They have used fashion to champion homegrown talent, support local businesses on tours and bring attention to causes bigger than themselves. They recognised that the platform wasn’t about them. It was about how they could use it in service of something greater. Meghan, on the other hand, often appeared far more interested in established luxury labels and big fashion houses. Yet listening to this interview, she speaks as though she was the one intentionally elevating others, as though this level of thoughtfulness and strategy began with Meghan Markle. To understand the disconnect, if Meghan Markle already had that level of influence from Suits onwards, where were the sell outs? Which brands couldn’t keep stock because Rachel Zane wore a blouse? Where were the websites dedicated to tracking Meghan Markle’s outfits before she became a working royal? And if the influence truly belonged to her alone, where is that same level of impact today? There seems to be no gratitude for the extraordinary platform she was given. No recognition that she stepped into an institution that amplified everything she touched. Just the conviction that she was the gift. Everything is always about Meghan. The influence was hers. The generosity was hers. The strategy was hers. The impact was hers. It’s an astonishing level of self importance to walk away from one of the biggest platforms in the world genuinely believing that everyone else was benefiting from you, rather than recognising just how much you had benefited from them.

Queen Esther

100,702 次观看 • 2 个月前

Is the Right Demanding Censorship of Tucker Carlson: A Textbook Business Strategy Case Study Analysis! "TPUSA needs to carefully decide who they choose to elevate as an "ambassador" for its brand." In the heated world of political discourse, accusations of censorship fly from all sides. But when it comes to high-profile figures like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, the question arises: Is the right truly demanding their silencing, or is something more nuanced at play? A recent controversy at Turning Point USA (TPUSA) has brought this debate into sharp focus, forcing us to examine the boundaries between free speech, organizational integrity, and leadership accountability. At its core, the issue boils down to a simple analogy: A keynote speaker at a major event is akin to an executive ambassador for the hosting organization. They don't just represent themselves; they embody the group's values, mission, and public image. For the right, which often decries the "censorious left" for blacklisting conservative voices, this principle cuts both ways. If large influencers on the right are acting in ways that undermine core ideals, it's not hypocrisy to call them out; it's consistency. Leaders, after all, are the architects of an organization's mission. Executives bear the responsibility for strategically executing that vision, including shaping the messaging that reaches audiences. When an executive veers off course; straying from the mission or strategy, it's the leader's duty to rein in the rogue official. This isn't about suppression; it's about stewardship. Ignore it, and you risk diluting the very purpose that drew people to the cause in the first place. Apply this business-like strategy framework to the TPUSA fiasco, and the picture becomes clearer. The decision to platform Tucker Carlson who has alligned himself alongside venomous individuals like Nick Fuentes; often labeled a "Nazi" for his far-right, white nationalist views; presents a profoundly difficult choice for any conservative leader committed to American principles. Carlson, once a Fox News staple, has built a career on provocative commentary. Yet, a closer look at his show reveals a pattern: He's amplified some of the most egregious guests imaginable, individuals whose rhetoric and actions stand in direct opposition to the American experiment. These aren't fringe missteps; they're antithetical to the foundational values of liberty, pluralism, and opportunity that TPUSA claims to champion. Inviting such figures doesn't just risk alienating allies; it actively counters the organization's stated mission of empowering young conservatives to defend freedom and build a stronger America. Fuentes, in particular, has drawn widespread condemnation for his Holocaust denial, antisemitism, and calls for a "white Christian" America, views that clash violently with the inclusive conservatism many on the right aspire to. As the leader of any organization, be it a corporation, nonprofit, or political movement, you're obligated to "walk the talk." That phrase isn't just motivational poster fodder; it demands action, especially when it requires making very difficult decisions. In TPUSA's case, disinviting Carlson as a keynote speaker isn't an act of censorship but a necessary course correction. It will respresent a stand for the mission over personal alliances, strategy over spectacle. Critics on the right might cry foul, equating this with the left's cancel culture playbook. But here's the distinction: True censorship seeks to erase voices from the public square entirely. This is about curating a platform that aligns with an organization's goals, not banning Carlson or Fuentes from speaking elsewhere. They remain free to broadcast their views on their own channels, to millions of followers. The appropriate choice is to debate these individuals at other venue choices, not at an annual TPUSA conference. TPUSA needs to carefully decide who they choose to elevate as an "ambassador" for its brand. In the end, this episode underscores a broader truth for the conservative movement: Free speech is sacred, but it's not a blank check for leaders to platform poison. If the right wants to reclaim moral high ground, it must hold its own accountable, just as it demands of the left. Tough calls like this aren't weakness; they're the mark of principled leadership. Only then can the movement truly advance its vision without being derailed by its own extremes. As the TPUSA team finalizes the blueprint for the December 2025 AmericaFest conference with Tucker Carlson slotted as the marquee keynote speaker a singular, searing imperative crystallizes: the resolve to sideline him from that premier keynote speaker ambassador role to a panelist at another event in a debate with large influencers like Ben Shapiro, James Lindsay, or Dinesh D'Souza at a conservative forum outside the TPUSA brand appears to be the only viable solution.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

17,765 次观看 • 10 个月前

🚨 Undercover Video Shows Israeli Contractors Have Manipulated in more than 33 Presidential Elections Worldwide — A Video Everyone Should Watch to Understand the Digital Battlefield • In 2023, a group of undercover journalists exposed a team of Israeli contractors, called Team Jorge. —— The undercover footage was filmed by three reporters, who approached Team Jorge posing as prospective clients who wanted to interfere in an election in Africa. • The unit is run by Tal Hanan, a 50-year-old former Israeli special forces operative who now works privately using the pseudonym “Jorge”, and appears to have been working under the radar in elections in various countries for more than two decades. —— Their tactics include hacking, sabotage and automated disinformation on social media. • In more than six hours of secretly recorded meetings, Hanan and his team spoke of how they could gather intelligence on rivals, including by using hacking techniques to gain complete access Gmail and Telegram accounts. —— they claim to be exploiting vulnerabilities in the ‘Global Sognaling System’ (SS7) —— They boasted of planting material in legitimate news outlets, which are then amplified by the AIMS bot-management software. —— They proclaimed that they’ve been successful with interfering in 27-33 Presidential-level campaigns. • One of Team Jorge’s key services is a sophisticated software package, Advanced Impact Media Solutions, or ‘AIMS’. —— ‘AIMS’ controls a vast army of thousands of fake social media profiles on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Telegram, Gmail, Instagram and YouTube. —— Some avatars even have Amazon accounts with credit cards, bitcoin wallets and Airbnb accounts, multiple-platform associated accounts, multiple AI images… All done to create the illusion these bots are a real person… • Much of their strategy revolves around disrupting or sabotaging rival campaigns: the team even claimed to have sent a s*x toy delivered via Amazon to the home of a politician, with the aim of giving his wife the false impression he was having an affair. • Leaked emails show a fee between $400k - 600k per month is their fee. —— another email shows that this team also worked exclusively on the Nigerian Presidential Election in 2015. So Next time you’re arguing with someone online on why they support pedophiles, funding wars, LGBTQ in kids classrooms… Think of this video. Clip Article (🧢ChiefChris)

🚨 Undercover Video Shows Israeli Contractors Have Manipulated in more than 33 Presidential Elections Worldwide — A Video Everyone Should Watch to Understand the Digital Battlefield • In 2023, a group of undercover journalists exposed a team of Israeli contractors, called Team Jorge. —— The undercover footage was filmed by three reporters, who approached Team Jorge posing as prospective clients who wanted to interfere in an election in Africa. • The unit is run by Tal Hanan, a 50-year-old former Israeli special forces operative who now works privately using the pseudonym “Jorge”, and appears to have been working under the radar in elections in various countries for more than two decades. —— Their tactics include hacking, sabotage and automated disinformation on social media. • In more than six hours of secretly recorded meetings, Hanan and his team spoke of how they could gather intelligence on rivals, including by using hacking techniques to gain complete access Gmail and Telegram accounts. —— they claim to be exploiting vulnerabilities in the ‘Global Sognaling System’ (SS7) —— They boasted of planting material in legitimate news outlets, which are then amplified by the AIMS bot-management software. —— They proclaimed that they’ve been successful with interfering in 27-33 Presidential-level campaigns. • One of Team Jorge’s key services is a sophisticated software package, Advanced Impact Media Solutions, or ‘AIMS’. —— ‘AIMS’ controls a vast army of thousands of fake social media profiles on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, Telegram, Gmail, Instagram and YouTube. —— Some avatars even have Amazon accounts with credit cards, bitcoin wallets and Airbnb accounts, multiple-platform associated accounts, multiple AI images… All done to create the illusion these bots are a real person… • Much of their strategy revolves around disrupting or sabotaging rival campaigns: the team even claimed to have sent a s*x toy delivered via Amazon to the home of a politician, with the aim of giving his wife the false impression he was having an affair. • Leaked emails show a fee between $400k - 600k per month is their fee. —— another email shows that this team also worked exclusively on the Nigerian Presidential Election in 2015. So Next time you’re arguing with someone online on why they support pedophiles, funding wars, LGBTQ in kids classrooms… Think of this video. Clip Article (🧢ChiefChris)

MJTruthUltra

373,362 次观看 • 2 年前

$Clueless Milquetoast Megyn Kelly Strikes Again! "It was just the young people on the left and independents and now in the Republican party the youth has turned on Israel. This is not all because of podcasters." ~ Megyn Kelly Today! Enter Carlson, Bannon, and Posobiec, who have suberted the MAGA movement, and have amplified Dugin's hybrid warfare intent on destroying America from within. In the circles of conservative influencers, a subtle but insidious ideology is taking root; one that doesn't originate from the Founding Fathers or the Constitution, but from the esoteric writings of Alexander Dugin, a Russian philosopher often dubbed the "Putin whisperer." I've spent months dissecting this threat of the Duginites who have infiltrated the MAGA conservative podcasters. What I've uncovered is a deliberate "hybrid warfare" strategy exploiting U.S. cultural divides, with prominent voices like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and Jack Posobiec unwittingly, or perhaps willfully, serving as conduits. This isn't mere intellectual curiosity; it's a calculated bid to fracture the American right and erode our global alliances. Dugin's blueprint for global upheaval, laid out in his 1997 manifesto The Foundations of Geopolitics, envisions a sprawling Eurasian empire under Russian dominance, countering the "Atlanticist" world order led by the United States. His "Fourth Political Theory" (FPT) rejects liberalism and capitalism outright, blending anti-modern holism with pre-enlightenment ideals from Plato and medieval hierarchies. It unites disparate forces; leftists, rightists, and religious zealots, against the "Beast" of hypermodernity. Dugin equates the Best with Western individualism, "woke" culture, and globalism. Eurasianism extols "tellurocracy" (land-based power) and Eastern "sobornost'" (collectivist hierarchy) over what he derides as America's atomized, materialistic society. Even socialism, in Dugin's view, is a flawed but superior alternative to liberal democracy. This isn't abstract theory; it's active subversion. Dugin targets the U.S. right by pitting "Atlanticists"; pro-globalist neoconservatives and liberals, against "Eurasianists," the traditionalist paleoconservatives and nationalists who sympathize with isolationism. By critiquing endless U.S. interventions abroad, Dugin sows seeds of doubt, framing Russia as a bulwark against cultural decay. His ideas fuel anti-woke rhetoric and calls for America First retrenchment, all while aiming to weaken NATO and the EU by driving a wedge between the U.S. and Europe. Enter the influencers: Carlson, Bannon, and Posobiec, ubiquitous in the MAGA movement, have amplified Dugin's philosophy in ways that demand scrutiny. Tucker Carlson has hosted interviews that resonate with Dugin's anti-interventionist critiques, portraying Russia as a traditionalist ally in the culture wars. In one pointed analysis I shared, Carlson's selective alliances, even praising hard-left figures on shared anti-Israel stances, reveal a politics organized around dismantling Western alliances, a hallmark of Duginite thinking. Steve Bannon, once a Trump architect, has veered further into this territory. His War Room podcast frequently features guests aligned with Dugin's multipolar vision, and in a November clip I highlighted, Bannon openly praised Nick Fuentes, a figure steeped in far-right admiration for the Russian philosopher. Bannon's promotion of Dugin's 1997 book on social media underscores his fascination with Eurasian geopolitics.Jack Posobiec, the Turning Point USA firebrand and former Naval Reserve intelligence officer, adds a layer of irony. Despite losing his security clearance in 2017 amid allegations of sharing classified info, Posobiec has tweeted glowingly about Dugin's work, including The Foundations of Geopolitics. As a frequent War Room guest, he bridges Bannon's platform with TPUSA's youth outreach, potentially normalizing these ideas for the next generation of conservatives. In a November post, I called out Posobiec's anti-neocon jabs—agreeable on the surface, like targeting Bill Kristol, but warned they mask deeper Duginite sympathies. This "Woke Reich," as I've termed it, isn't organic conservatism; it's a Trojan horse. Dugin's hybrid warfare exploits our internal battles over wokeness, borders, and endless wars; meant to subordinate sympathetic Westerners to a multipolar, anti-liberal order. I've hosted X Spaces with researcher Trevor Loudon, a specialist in communist infiltration, to unpack this twice in November alone, drawing crowds eager for the truth. Loudon's insights confirm: Dugin's strategy is to dismantle America from within, using cultural affinity as camouflage. Even figures like Megyn Kelly and Marjorie Taylor Greene risk pushing Dugin without realizing it, adopting his anti-liberal zeal under the guise of "dumb blonde" populism. My days have been consumed studying this because saving our republic demands it. The alt-right's affection for Dugin isn't accidental; it's engineered to destroy us. As we approach a pivotal 2026, conservatives must reject this foreign poison. True America First means defending our sovereignty against all threats, domestic or imported. Let's reclaim our movement before the "Woke Reich" controls it.$

Clueless Milquetoast Megyn Kelly Strikes Again! "It was just the young people on the left and independents and now in the Republican party the youth has turned on Israel. This is not all because of podcasters." ~ Megyn Kelly Today! Enter Carlson, Bannon, and Posobiec, who have suberted the MAGA movement, and have amplified Dugin's hybrid warfare intent on destroying America from within. In the circles of conservative influencers, a subtle but insidious ideology is taking root; one that doesn't originate from the Founding Fathers or the Constitution, but from the esoteric writings of Alexander Dugin, a Russian philosopher often dubbed the "Putin whisperer." I've spent months dissecting this threat of the Duginites who have infiltrated the MAGA conservative podcasters. What I've uncovered is a deliberate "hybrid warfare" strategy exploiting U.S. cultural divides, with prominent voices like Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, and Jack Posobiec unwittingly, or perhaps willfully, serving as conduits. This isn't mere intellectual curiosity; it's a calculated bid to fracture the American right and erode our global alliances. Dugin's blueprint for global upheaval, laid out in his 1997 manifesto The Foundations of Geopolitics, envisions a sprawling Eurasian empire under Russian dominance, countering the "Atlanticist" world order led by the United States. His "Fourth Political Theory" (FPT) rejects liberalism and capitalism outright, blending anti-modern holism with pre-enlightenment ideals from Plato and medieval hierarchies. It unites disparate forces; leftists, rightists, and religious zealots, against the "Beast" of hypermodernity. Dugin equates the Best with Western individualism, "woke" culture, and globalism. Eurasianism extols "tellurocracy" (land-based power) and Eastern "sobornost'" (collectivist hierarchy) over what he derides as America's atomized, materialistic society. Even socialism, in Dugin's view, is a flawed but superior alternative to liberal democracy. This isn't abstract theory; it's active subversion. Dugin targets the U.S. right by pitting "Atlanticists"; pro-globalist neoconservatives and liberals, against "Eurasianists," the traditionalist paleoconservatives and nationalists who sympathize with isolationism. By critiquing endless U.S. interventions abroad, Dugin sows seeds of doubt, framing Russia as a bulwark against cultural decay. His ideas fuel anti-woke rhetoric and calls for America First retrenchment, all while aiming to weaken NATO and the EU by driving a wedge between the U.S. and Europe. Enter the influencers: Carlson, Bannon, and Posobiec, ubiquitous in the MAGA movement, have amplified Dugin's philosophy in ways that demand scrutiny. Tucker Carlson has hosted interviews that resonate with Dugin's anti-interventionist critiques, portraying Russia as a traditionalist ally in the culture wars. In one pointed analysis I shared, Carlson's selective alliances, even praising hard-left figures on shared anti-Israel stances, reveal a politics organized around dismantling Western alliances, a hallmark of Duginite thinking. Steve Bannon, once a Trump architect, has veered further into this territory. His War Room podcast frequently features guests aligned with Dugin's multipolar vision, and in a November clip I highlighted, Bannon openly praised Nick Fuentes, a figure steeped in far-right admiration for the Russian philosopher. Bannon's promotion of Dugin's 1997 book on social media underscores his fascination with Eurasian geopolitics.Jack Posobiec, the Turning Point USA firebrand and former Naval Reserve intelligence officer, adds a layer of irony. Despite losing his security clearance in 2017 amid allegations of sharing classified info, Posobiec has tweeted glowingly about Dugin's work, including The Foundations of Geopolitics. As a frequent War Room guest, he bridges Bannon's platform with TPUSA's youth outreach, potentially normalizing these ideas for the next generation of conservatives. In a November post, I called out Posobiec's anti-neocon jabs—agreeable on the surface, like targeting Bill Kristol, but warned they mask deeper Duginite sympathies. This "Woke Reich," as I've termed it, isn't organic conservatism; it's a Trojan horse. Dugin's hybrid warfare exploits our internal battles over wokeness, borders, and endless wars; meant to subordinate sympathetic Westerners to a multipolar, anti-liberal order. I've hosted X Spaces with researcher Trevor Loudon, a specialist in communist infiltration, to unpack this twice in November alone, drawing crowds eager for the truth. Loudon's insights confirm: Dugin's strategy is to dismantle America from within, using cultural affinity as camouflage. Even figures like Megyn Kelly and Marjorie Taylor Greene risk pushing Dugin without realizing it, adopting his anti-liberal zeal under the guise of "dumb blonde" populism. My days have been consumed studying this because saving our republic demands it. The alt-right's affection for Dugin isn't accidental; it's engineered to destroy us. As we approach a pivotal 2026, conservatives must reject this foreign poison. True America First means defending our sovereignty against all threats, domestic or imported. Let's reclaim our movement before the "Woke Reich" controls it.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

30,196 次观看 • 8 个月前

HOW SON OF A POACHER UHURU KENYATTA KILLED NAIROBI CBD The death of Nairobi’s vibrant Central Business District was no accident but a calculated psychological operation to crush youth empowerment and economic vitality under the pretense of restoring order. Former President Uhuru Kenyatta, raised in the rural enclave of Ichaweri, collaborated with influential politicians from Kenya’s Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASAL) regions, using their financial backing to orchestrate a campaign that weaponized fear, moral panic, and state power to dismantle the city’s nightlife and subdue its rebellious youth. The psychological assault began with a manufactured narrative, amplified by mainstream “githeri media” and compliant church leaders, vilifying alcohol, a major taxpayer and cultural cornerstone of Nairobi’s nightlife, as a moral and social evil. Youth vibrancy, expressed through music, nightlife, and urban culture, was branded a threat to stability and progress. Commercial activists like The People’s President joined this bandwagon, glorifying Alcoblow as a public safety measure while aligning with the government’s broader agenda to disempower the masses. This narrative exploited societal anxieties, convincing Kenyans that curbing nightlife was essential for “order,” when it was, in truth, a strategy to neutralize a politically aware youth population that Kenyatta’s administration feared could topple his regime. Under this orchestrated moral panic, Alcoblow, presented as a drunk-driving deterrent, was unmasked as a tool of oppression. The death of Albert Ojwang revealed a darker truth: senior police bosses, led by figures like Eliud Lagat, pocketed bribes extorted through Alcoblow enforcement to purchase real estate in Dubai. Far from a moral necessity or road safety measure, Alcoblow was a mechanism to suppress the population while enriching corrupt officials. Kiganjo D(minus) National Police Service-Kenya idiots enforced illegal curfews, arresting pedestrians as early as 8 p.m. on flimsy charges like “loitering” or “prostitution,” and extorted motorists with impunity. This aggressive policing strangled Nairobi’s human and vehicular traffic, suffocating the CBD’s economic pulse. The collapse of nightlife paved the way for a hostile takeover. Iconic bars, symbols of Nairobi’s cultural heritage, were replaced by restaurants and fronts for money laundering, owned by sugar importers and corrupt county officials. This mirrored the desolation of Kenya’s Northern Frontier, where manufactured terrorist threats by Al-Shabab sympathizers like Hon. Aden Duale, EGH , Noordin Haji NIS and Farah Maalim EGH keep residents in fear while enabling political looting. The psychological manipulation, instilling fear, demonizing youth culture, and eroding economic vibrancy, devastated Nairobi’s CBD, costing over 300,000 jobs in hospitality, transport, and entertainment. By framing empowered youth as a danger, Kenyatta’s administration, aided by complicit activists and a corrupt police force, dismantled Nairobi’s economic and cultural core. The city now echoes the lifeless towns of the Northern Frontier, subdued by design. This was not just the death of a city; it was a psychological assault on its soul, orchestrated to protect elite power and plunder.

HOW SON OF A POACHER UHURU KENYATTA KILLED NAIROBI CBD The death of Nairobi’s vibrant Central Business District was no accident but a calculated psychological operation to crush youth empowerment and economic vitality under the pretense of restoring order. Former President Uhuru Kenyatta, raised in the rural enclave of Ichaweri, collaborated with influential politicians from Kenya’s Arid and Semi-Arid Lands (ASAL) regions, using their financial backing to orchestrate a campaign that weaponized fear, moral panic, and state power to dismantle the city’s nightlife and subdue its rebellious youth. The psychological assault began with a manufactured narrative, amplified by mainstream “githeri media” and compliant church leaders, vilifying alcohol, a major taxpayer and cultural cornerstone of Nairobi’s nightlife, as a moral and social evil. Youth vibrancy, expressed through music, nightlife, and urban culture, was branded a threat to stability and progress. Commercial activists like The People’s President joined this bandwagon, glorifying Alcoblow as a public safety measure while aligning with the government’s broader agenda to disempower the masses. This narrative exploited societal anxieties, convincing Kenyans that curbing nightlife was essential for “order,” when it was, in truth, a strategy to neutralize a politically aware youth population that Kenyatta’s administration feared could topple his regime. Under this orchestrated moral panic, Alcoblow, presented as a drunk-driving deterrent, was unmasked as a tool of oppression. The death of Albert Ojwang revealed a darker truth: senior police bosses, led by figures like Eliud Lagat, pocketed bribes extorted through Alcoblow enforcement to purchase real estate in Dubai. Far from a moral necessity or road safety measure, Alcoblow was a mechanism to suppress the population while enriching corrupt officials. Kiganjo D(minus) National Police Service-Kenya idiots enforced illegal curfews, arresting pedestrians as early as 8 p.m. on flimsy charges like “loitering” or “prostitution,” and extorted motorists with impunity. This aggressive policing strangled Nairobi’s human and vehicular traffic, suffocating the CBD’s economic pulse. The collapse of nightlife paved the way for a hostile takeover. Iconic bars, symbols of Nairobi’s cultural heritage, were replaced by restaurants and fronts for money laundering, owned by sugar importers and corrupt county officials. This mirrored the desolation of Kenya’s Northern Frontier, where manufactured terrorist threats by Al-Shabab sympathizers like Hon. Aden Duale, EGH , Noordin Haji NIS and Farah Maalim EGH keep residents in fear while enabling political looting. The psychological manipulation, instilling fear, demonizing youth culture, and eroding economic vibrancy, devastated Nairobi’s CBD, costing over 300,000 jobs in hospitality, transport, and entertainment. By framing empowered youth as a danger, Kenyatta’s administration, aided by complicit activists and a corrupt police force, dismantled Nairobi’s economic and cultural core. The city now echoes the lifeless towns of the Northern Frontier, subdued by design. This was not just the death of a city; it was a psychological assault on its soul, orchestrated to protect elite power and plunder.

Francis Gaitho

24,299 次观看 • 1 年前