💥 Stubb: “Why would Russia test Article 5 if it failed to conquer Ukraine in four years?” The President of Finland said he sees no reason for the Kremlin to enter into a direct military conflict with the Alliance. “During the Second World War, it took Russia four years... to reach Berlin — they covered 1,600 kilometers, and now Russians have advanced about 60 kilometers in Ukraine during active war,” Alexander Stubb said in an interview with the Swiss newspaper Neue Zürcher Zeitung. At the same time, the Finnish president does not believe the threat has completely disappeared. However, he considers it unlikely that the Kremlin would directly test NATO’s strength with a military strike. Still, a similar question could have been asked in 2022, 2014, and 2008: why did the Kremlin need to attack Ukraine? And Georgia? Do you have any answers?show more

They only reached Berlin thanks to huge amounts of western equipment being handed over to them, and because the Germans had to fight on 3 fronts

Ukraine, Georgia… are not NATO members. So what does that have to do with anything? Stubb’s remarks are obvious;anyone with basic intelligence could make them. The rest is propaganda,a failed attempt to convince public opinion to accept the billions spent on Ukraine and weapons

Russia is terrorist state.

Maybe Stubb is right that times have changed but he assumes Russian leadership is rational - there's no sign that Russians have changed...🤮

They may attack a NATO country for this reason. Imperial hubris and shame prevents Russians admitting that they’re losing to Ukrainians. They may just attack a NATO country and accept losing to NATO with far less shame.

Why would pres dumb attack iran if he has no plan? Epstein. Wars are used to distract. Putin needs distraction from his non-existing economy, his UA defeat, russian 4th world poorness.

The Baltic states are a possibility because they aren’t quite built to stop the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. Large armored columns from russia that could achieve linkage to Kaliningrad and then call for a ceasefire while they keep them in future negotiations. A drone wall is needed.

Finland is now in the shit 3/4 of there trade was with Russia talk about shooting themselves in the foot another idiot leader descend to the dustbin are there any real statesmen left in politics because non of these seam to make any good decisions

Dotarli.pod Berlin bo caly swiat im w tym pomogl. Od traktatu z Rapallo - czy nawet wczesniej wszyscy pchali im ile mogli z kazdej dziedziny. Pozniej lend-lease i jakos doszli.

Розкажете це коли за добу вам прилетить 1000 шлюхедів. Не доведи Боже, звісно.

I do not believe that they have any intention, to put more on their plate. They are really struggling with Ukraine and there is no mythical "real Russian army" waiting to strike. That is all they have, to attack someone else, they would have to divert from Ukraine. And then they would activate hundreds of Eurofighters, Rafale and F-35 against them ...

Spot-on comparison by Stubb. The difference between logistics in WWII and the modern reality in Ukraine highlights how much Russia has struggled conventionally. Direct confrontation with NATO would be a completely different ballgame.

Anything Ruzzia could field to invade Europe could be stopped by a 80y old Finnish reservist with a Mosin-Nagant.

Lol 😂 fool if Article 5 activated then China North Korea Iran and others will join Russia and they will crush your alliance in 1 month. Little fools keep deceiving your citizens till the real war starts.

Russia is protecting America nato is traitors it's time America wakes up nato is traitors Russia is our ally

Russia doesn't have the capacity for a general invasion of Europe. What it could do is say "Those awful Estonians are oppressing Russian nationals. We're just moving a few troops in to protect them. Sure you want to go to war over it?" Or, "We have an emergency in Kaliningrad and need to move materials there through the Suwalki Gap. We're sending to troops to protect the supplies but we'll withdraw them as soon as the emergency is over. Sure you want to go to war over it?" Russia would nibble around the edges with hopes that various NATO members would look for excuses to not do anything.

La Rusia de Putin es un fracaso regentado por mafiosos. Invadir un país u otro revive la nostalgia imperial y hace funcionar la industria militar del país, aunque no se había topado con Occidente en pleno. Si Putin deja de pedalear se cae de su bicicleta.

Propaganda. If they would had totally failed the war would be over…

But now 🇺🇦 is putting #FuckRussia on back foot. How can russnyà invade another country? They have been invaded too from 🇺🇦🫢

Because the war in Iran has clearly shown that it is not the strongest who wins, but the one who is ready to fight to the blood and make sacrifices for the sake of victory. NATO is not ready for that right now.

It’s the fact that these have been small local determined actions with no serious capabilities to defend. With 2022 Invasion the Szenario changed from limited fast action to a real war, leading Russia to use full scale of conventional forces in the end.

The assumption that rational “cost-benefit limits” always restrain escalation has been repeatedly disproven. Russia’s past actions show strategic decisions aren’t only about feasibility, but about perceived political opportunity and deterrence gaps.

@MASK45292390 Ой - та що тамвипробовувати-поки розтелетес кацапи вас всіх убьють

why do you have a russian accent? must be a kremlin spy

Nevertheless, he knows better than anyone - and would say so in private - that NATO is preparing for the worst, especially Finland and #NB8.

Back then, preNATO, it would have been unthinkable for the Russians to count on the full support of the US traitors. This situation must never occur again in the future by not entering into an alliance with the US, and never again being dependent on the US for essential weapons.

Para impedir que a UE cresça até às suas fronteiras

Read Putin's speeches. He tells you why. He's nuts.

So they could say „we failed because of NATO„

что вы все к срокам прикопались, Россия их не ставила, главное добиться достижения целей СВО, и Россия добьется

Weil wir nicht mehr in den 1940er Jahren leben. Heute sehen kriegerische Handlungen ganz anders aus. Im Grenzort Narwa einen Testballone zu starten kostet 🇷🇺 ca. 1500 Drohnen und bis 5000 Soldaten mit entsprechendem militärischen Gerät. Und schon wäre Artikel 5 gegeben.