Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

God bless technological progress and video archives! Here's almost four minutes of Putin's evolving statements from 2008 to 2024: 2008: "Crimea is not disputed territory of Ukraine, and the issues of Russian speakers are internal issues of Ukraine." 2013: "Russia certainly doesn't plan to send troops into Ukraine." 2014:...

adnashmyash's profile picture

Maksym Borodin

21,228 subscribers

826,531 views • 10 months ago •via X (Twitter)

News & PoliticsComedy
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Putin said he plans to continue the war because Ukraine "is not in a hurry to solve this conflict with peaceful means." So, Putin says, if "Kyiv authorities do not wish to end the issue peacefully, we will solve all the tasks that are in front of us during the special military operation in an armed way." Russia is the aggressor. Russia attacked Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine to capitulate. Ukraine has always wanted peace. Ukraine has accepted all ceasefire proposals, unlike Russia.
1:32

Putin said he plans to continue the war because Ukraine "is not in a hurry to solve this conflict with peaceful means." So, Putin says, if "Kyiv authorities do not wish to end the issue peacefully, we will solve all the tasks that are in front of us during the special military operation in an armed way." Russia is the aggressor. Russia attacked Ukraine. Russia wants Ukraine to capitulate. Ukraine has always wanted peace. Ukraine has accepted all ceasefire proposals, unlike Russia.

Anton Gerashchenko

495,543 views • 7 months ago

"If drones are flying from Ukraine into NATO countries, it's because of Russia" - RUTTI FRUTTI 🤦‍♀️ "If drones are flying from Ukrainian territory, they're not there because Ukraine wants to send a drone to Latvia, Lithuania, or Estonia. They're there because of Russia's reckless and illegal full-scale attack, which began in 2022—and before that, of course, because of what Russia did against Ukraine in Crimea in 2014. That's precisely why this is happening."
0:34

"If drones are flying from Ukraine into NATO countries, it's because of Russia" - RUTTI FRUTTI 🤦‍♀️ "If drones are flying from Ukrainian territory, they're not there because Ukraine wants to send a drone to Latvia, Lithuania, or Estonia. They're there because of Russia's reckless and illegal full-scale attack, which began in 2022—and before that, of course, because of what Russia did against Ukraine in Crimea in 2014. That's precisely why this is happening."

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

14,441 views • 3 months ago

🇸🇪⚔️🇷🇺Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard refused to recognize Crimea as Russian territory and declared her intention to weaken Russia: Ukraine has always demonstrated that it is serious about achieving a just and lasting peace. Russia has not. Ukraine offered a complete, unconditional ceasefire. Russia did not. Ukraine has always been ready for negotiations. Russia has not. Since Russia's position has not changed, neither has Sweden's or the EU's position. As long as Russian aggression continues, Sweden has a clear two-point plan: to strengthen Ukraine and weaken Russia. This summit also allows us to reaffirm some basic facts once again. Crimea is Ukraine. Donetsk is Ukraine. Luhansk is Ukraine. Kherson is Ukraine. And Zaporizhzhia is Ukraine. And let me state clearly and unequivocally: Sweden does not recognize Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea or any other part of Ukraine's territory. Two Majors
1:00

🇸🇪⚔️🇷🇺Swedish Foreign Minister Maria Malmer Stenergard refused to recognize Crimea as Russian territory and declared her intention to weaken Russia: Ukraine has always demonstrated that it is serious about achieving a just and lasting peace. Russia has not. Ukraine offered a complete, unconditional ceasefire. Russia did not. Ukraine has always been ready for negotiations. Russia has not. Since Russia's position has not changed, neither has Sweden's or the EU's position. As long as Russian aggression continues, Sweden has a clear two-point plan: to strengthen Ukraine and weaken Russia. This summit also allows us to reaffirm some basic facts once again. Crimea is Ukraine. Donetsk is Ukraine. Luhansk is Ukraine. Kherson is Ukraine. And Zaporizhzhia is Ukraine. And let me state clearly and unequivocally: Sweden does not recognize Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea or any other part of Ukraine's territory. Two Majors

dana

22,852 views • 8 months ago

"We need recognition of the agreements, but not from Ukraine," Putin said. "We want to reach an agreement with Ukraine, but right now it's legally impossible. Anyone who wants to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine can do so. We need our agreements to be recognized by the major international players. That's all." This matters. It's one thing for decisions to be recognized and for territories to be under Russian sovereignty; violating the agreements would be an attack on Russia with all the retaliatory measures that entails, or it would be perceived as Ukraine attempting to reclaim its territories. Of course, we need recognition, but not from Ukraine." Because such recognition won't happen, Russia will have to fight until there's no Ukraine, and no one will be left to try to reclaim the territories.
1:02

"We need recognition of the agreements, but not from Ukraine," Putin said. "We want to reach an agreement with Ukraine, but right now it's legally impossible. Anyone who wants to negotiate on behalf of Ukraine can do so. We need our agreements to be recognized by the major international players. That's all." This matters. It's one thing for decisions to be recognized and for territories to be under Russian sovereignty; violating the agreements would be an attack on Russia with all the retaliatory measures that entails, or it would be perceived as Ukraine attempting to reclaim its territories. Of course, we need recognition, but not from Ukraine." Because such recognition won't happen, Russia will have to fight until there's no Ukraine, and no one will be left to try to reclaim the territories.

Victor vicktop55 commentary

16,454 views • 8 months ago

US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker (my two cents) below): I think the Russian threat sometimes is a little overstated. They have not had a lot of success. And to your point, Ukraine has actually taken back territory. To me, that points to a weakness in Russia, and as their economy continues to falter, I think their continuation of this war is going to be difficult. My input: Russia has not had a lot of success in Ukraine because Ukrainian Defenders make a tremendous effort, and the West supplies Ukraine with weapons. Yes, Ukraine has retaken our territories, but this is first and foremost a compliment to Ukrainian skill. Russia does not play by the rules, Putin knows that his power relies on Russia waging a war, and Russia does not care about its people. NATO has named Russia as its most significant threat, and Russia remains one.
0:39

US Ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker (my two cents) below): I think the Russian threat sometimes is a little overstated. They have not had a lot of success. And to your point, Ukraine has actually taken back territory. To me, that points to a weakness in Russia, and as their economy continues to falter, I think their continuation of this war is going to be difficult. My input: Russia has not had a lot of success in Ukraine because Ukrainian Defenders make a tremendous effort, and the West supplies Ukraine with weapons. Yes, Ukraine has retaken our territories, but this is first and foremost a compliment to Ukrainian skill. Russia does not play by the rules, Putin knows that his power relies on Russia waging a war, and Russia does not care about its people. NATO has named Russia as its most significant threat, and Russia remains one.

Anton Gerashchenko

85,158 views • 11 months ago

💬 "Under international law, Ukraine is allowed to strike any legitimate military target on the territory of Russia because Ukraine and Russia are at war. We actually do not understand the attention to this fact because Russia is striking military, civilian, and other targets inside Ukraine, and Ukraine has every right under international law and the UN charter, 51st Article, to strike any legitimate target inside Russia", stated Heorhii Tykhyi.
1:20

💬 "Under international law, Ukraine is allowed to strike any legitimate military target on the territory of Russia because Ukraine and Russia are at war. We actually do not understand the attention to this fact because Russia is striking military, civilian, and other targets inside Ukraine, and Ukraine has every right under international law and the UN charter, 51st Article, to strike any legitimate target inside Russia", stated Heorhii Tykhyi.

MFA of Ukraine 🇺🇦

109,333 views • 11 months ago

☝️ “Do you realize or not that if Ukraine joins NATO and tries to reclaim Crimea by force, European countries will automatically be drawn into a military conflict with Russia? Of course, the potential of the united NATO and Russia is not comparable. We understand this, but we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers. There will be no winners. And you will find yourselves drawn into this conflict against your will. You won't even have time to blink an eye before Article 5 is invoked” - President Putin
0:41

☝️ “Do you realize or not that if Ukraine joins NATO and tries to reclaim Crimea by force, European countries will automatically be drawn into a military conflict with Russia? Of course, the potential of the united NATO and Russia is not comparable. We understand this, but we also understand that Russia is one of the leading nuclear powers. There will be no winners. And you will find yourselves drawn into this conflict against your will. You won't even have time to blink an eye before Article 5 is invoked” - President Putin

🇷🇺Russia is not Enemy

100,929 views • 10 months ago

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 "Kremlin doesn't understand Zelensky's statement that Russia needs to prepare a plan B to end the conflict. Ukraine is losing territory and will continue to lose it. Tomorrow's situation will be different from today's." — Russia's Press Secretary, Peskov "Russia is considering ending the military conflict in the context of achieving its OWN goals. These are the plans A, B and C!" — states
1:17

🇷🇺🇺🇸🇺🇦 "Kremlin doesn't understand Zelensky's statement that Russia needs to prepare a plan B to end the conflict. Ukraine is losing territory and will continue to lose it. Tomorrow's situation will be different from today's." — Russia's Press Secretary, Peskov "Russia is considering ending the military conflict in the context of achieving its OWN goals. These are the plans A, B and C!" — states

Lord Bebo

14,327 views • 7 months ago

🗣 Putin Before Becoming President “We do not want to take Crimea from Ukraine. If we try to take something from someone, then Russia will lose its own territories. Such a redistribution will begin across the territories of the former USSR that Russia will never be able to recover from. In the territory of the Russian Federation alone, there are 400 disputed territories. The main problem is Russia’s heavy imperial legacy. For some reason, everyone assumes that Russia has remained an empire — but that has long not been the case.”
0:51

🗣 Putin Before Becoming President “We do not want to take Crimea from Ukraine. If we try to take something from someone, then Russia will lose its own territories. Such a redistribution will begin across the territories of the former USSR that Russia will never be able to recover from. In the territory of the Russian Federation alone, there are 400 disputed territories. The main problem is Russia’s heavy imperial legacy. For some reason, everyone assumes that Russia has remained an empire — but that has long not been the case.”

Devana 🇺🇦

27,190 views • 7 months ago

Terrorist Zelensky declared he could strike Crimea with American missiles because, for him, it's not Russia, but Ukraine. 'We will never use long-range American-made missiles to strike Russia. This is important. Crimea is Ukraine. And we cannot say that we are using American weapons against Russia, against the occupied territories.'
0:50

Terrorist Zelensky declared he could strike Crimea with American missiles because, for him, it's not Russia, but Ukraine. 'We will never use long-range American-made missiles to strike Russia. This is important. Crimea is Ukraine. And we cannot say that we are using American weapons against Russia, against the occupied territories.'

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

64,750 views • 10 months ago

On June 1, 1996, the last nuclear missiles were brought from Ukraine into Russia. The next day, Ukraine has lost its status of a nuclear state after signing the Budapest Memorandum. The US, the UK and Russia gave their assurances that Ukrainian security and sovereignty would not be violated. In exchange, Ukraine promised to give up its nuclear arsenal - one-third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal in total. Ukraine held up our end of the bargain. By 1996, all Ukrainian nuclear warheads were transferred to Russia. Some other military equipment - like strategic bomber planes - was simply scrapped; some were transferred to Russia, and, according to recent investigations, they are now used for missile strikes on Ukraine. In 2014, Russia broke its promises by annexing Crimea and invading Donbas. In 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion on Ukraine. Russia would not have dared to attack another nuclear state. The Russian aggression today is a direct consequence of the Budapest Memorandum. Today, Ukraine has launched a successful attack on Russia's strategic aviation. Tu-95 and Tu-160 are capable of launching cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.
0:41

On June 1, 1996, the last nuclear missiles were brought from Ukraine into Russia. The next day, Ukraine has lost its status of a nuclear state after signing the Budapest Memorandum. The US, the UK and Russia gave their assurances that Ukrainian security and sovereignty would not be violated. In exchange, Ukraine promised to give up its nuclear arsenal - one-third of the Soviet nuclear arsenal in total. Ukraine held up our end of the bargain. By 1996, all Ukrainian nuclear warheads were transferred to Russia. Some other military equipment - like strategic bomber planes - was simply scrapped; some were transferred to Russia, and, according to recent investigations, they are now used for missile strikes on Ukraine. In 2014, Russia broke its promises by annexing Crimea and invading Donbas. In 2022, Russia launched a full-scale invasion on Ukraine. Russia would not have dared to attack another nuclear state. The Russian aggression today is a direct consequence of the Budapest Memorandum. Today, Ukraine has launched a successful attack on Russia's strategic aviation. Tu-95 and Tu-160 are capable of launching cruise missiles with nuclear warheads.

Anton Gerashchenko

216,718 views • 1 year ago

Chasiv Yar. The aggressor, Russia, has been razing cities to the ground in Ukraine for more than two years now. Fuck everyone who justifies Russian aggression. Fuck everyone who calls on Ukraine to surrender to this evil. Fuck everyone who speaks against arming Ukraine. Fuck everyone who speaks against putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine. Putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine had to happen two years ago. Fuck everyone who is against the collapse of Russia. Russia needs to collapse, and Russia will collapse. Arm Ukraine now to defeat Russia sooner rather than later. Arm Ukraine, now! Ukraine in NATO, and NATO in Ukraine, now! NATO has been created to deter Russian aggression. NATO ate budgets for years, and now that Russian aggression is here, NATO is failing to deter Russia and to stop Russia. NATO should lean into the war because the war is already here, and Russia started it in 2014 with the illegal occupation of Crimea. There is no folding it back into a matching box. The war is here.
0:53

Chasiv Yar. The aggressor, Russia, has been razing cities to the ground in Ukraine for more than two years now. Fuck everyone who justifies Russian aggression. Fuck everyone who calls on Ukraine to surrender to this evil. Fuck everyone who speaks against arming Ukraine. Fuck everyone who speaks against putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine. Putting NATO boots on the ground in Ukraine had to happen two years ago. Fuck everyone who is against the collapse of Russia. Russia needs to collapse, and Russia will collapse. Arm Ukraine now to defeat Russia sooner rather than later. Arm Ukraine, now! Ukraine in NATO, and NATO in Ukraine, now! NATO has been created to deter Russian aggression. NATO ate budgets for years, and now that Russian aggression is here, NATO is failing to deter Russia and to stop Russia. NATO should lean into the war because the war is already here, and Russia started it in 2014 with the illegal occupation of Crimea. There is no folding it back into a matching box. The war is here.

Stardust Collector

136,923 views • 2 years ago

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer
1:49

HE (RUBIO) DOES NOT UNDERSTAND, AND THIS IS TRUE OF THE VAST MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN FOREIGN POLICY ESTABLISHMENT IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT FOR RUSSIA, THIS IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT. THE POSSIBILITY OF UKRAINE BECOMING A MEMBER OF NATO IS SIMPLY UNACCEPTABLE TO THE RUSSIANS. IT IS AN EXISTENTIAL THREAT, AND THEY ARE NOT GONNA STOP UNTIL UKRAINE AND THE WEST ARE DEFEATED AND THEY BOTH ACCEPT THE FACT THAT UKRAINE HAS TO BE A NEUTRAL STATE, NUMBER ONE, AND IT HAS TO BE DISARMED TO THE POINT OFFENSIVE THREAT TO RUSSIA. - John Mearsheimer

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

54,393 views • 10 months ago

🇷🇺🇺🇸 "US promised Russia not to grant Ukraine a spot in NATO and to facilitate the transfer of territories" — Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov He adds that status of Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Russian language will be restored "Now we need to address these root causes, and it's good that the Americans have understood this"
4:47

🇷🇺🇺🇸 "US promised Russia not to grant Ukraine a spot in NATO and to facilitate the transfer of territories" — Russia's FM Sergey Lavrov He adds that status of Ukrainian Orthodox Church and the Russian language will be restored "Now we need to address these root causes, and it's good that the Americans have understood this"

Lord Bebo

69,990 views • 8 months ago

Even foreigners understand that Russia's demands to give Ukraine the Russian Orthodox Church, to make the Russian language the state language - this is the occupation of Ukraine, this is the destruction of Ukraine by non-military means. Unfortunately, the US does not understand this. Incompetence or working for Russia? I don't even know what is worse...
1:54

Even foreigners understand that Russia's demands to give Ukraine the Russian Orthodox Church, to make the Russian language the state language - this is the occupation of Ukraine, this is the destruction of Ukraine by non-military means. Unfortunately, the US does not understand this. Incompetence or working for Russia? I don't even know what is worse...

Devana 🇺🇦

41,742 views • 8 months ago

🚨INTERVIEW: “NO NATO COUNTRY IS GOING TO ATTACK RUSSIA - ON THE CONTRARY, RUSSIA WILL” "The first attack on Ukraine in 2022, and then Russia’s failures that same year to achieve their goals, created an opening for Finland and then Sweden to join NATO. Once Finland joined NATO, the length of the border between Russia and NATO countries doubled. NATO effectively moved to the outskirts of Putin’s native city of Saint Petersburg. So, if Russia were truly concerned about a NATO attack, it would be reasonable to expect that at least half of the army fighting in Ukraine would have been moved to Saint Petersburg to protect northern Russia from a possible NATO offensive. On the contrary, troops that were near Saint Petersburg were moved to Ukraine. And there is a conviction that no NATO country is going to attack Russia. On the contrary, it is Russia that is attacking a future NATO country." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.
2:51

🚨INTERVIEW: “NO NATO COUNTRY IS GOING TO ATTACK RUSSIA - ON THE CONTRARY, RUSSIA WILL” "The first attack on Ukraine in 2022, and then Russia’s failures that same year to achieve their goals, created an opening for Finland and then Sweden to join NATO. Once Finland joined NATO, the length of the border between Russia and NATO countries doubled. NATO effectively moved to the outskirts of Putin’s native city of Saint Petersburg. So, if Russia were truly concerned about a NATO attack, it would be reasonable to expect that at least half of the army fighting in Ukraine would have been moved to Saint Petersburg to protect northern Russia from a possible NATO offensive. On the contrary, troops that were near Saint Petersburg were moved to Ukraine. And there is a conviction that no NATO country is going to attack Russia. On the contrary, it is Russia that is attacking a future NATO country." Serhii Plokhy, Harvard Professor of Ukrainian History.

Mario Nawfal

42,126 views • 8 months ago