Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

STUDENT SHOOTER ENTERED THROUGH EMERGENCY EXIT Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla said the Grade 8 shooter entered the Ateneo de Zamboanga University Junior High School building through an unlocked emergency exit at around 7:50 a.m. on Tuesday, 20 minutes after classes started. Remulla stressed that the school followed its security... protocols, but the shooter “found an opportunity” to enter through the emergency exit. “Nakahanap siya ng butas. Pagpapasok, sa normal gate ng Ateneo. Pumasok siya sa emergency exit. Sa emergency exit kasi, hindi nilalagyan ng lock. Binubuksan ‘yan pagdating sa school time,” Remulla explained on Thursday. “In the case of Ateneo, they did everything right. They only opened it when [classes] started. And that is according to law,” he added. #SelfiePatrol ABS-CBN Newsshow more

Bianca Dava-Lee 🐱

16,818 subscribers

10,768 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

‘HE WAS A NORMAL KID, ONE OF THE BRIGHTEST’ WATCH: Ateneo de Zamboanga University board chairman Pocholo Soliven said the Grade 8 student accused of carrying out the shooting at the school was considered “one of the brightest” students in his grade level and had graduated as grade school valedictorian at Ateneo. Soliven emphasized the importance of a whole-of-community approach to educating and guiding children, saying a child’s behavior is shaped not only by the school but also by how they are raised and guided at home. The incident at the university’s junior high school campus in Barangay Tumaga on Tuesday, Aug. 18, left two students dead, including the alleged shooter. | Chim Cantos,

‘HE WAS A NORMAL KID, ONE OF THE BRIGHTEST’ WATCH: Ateneo de Zamboanga University board chairman Pocholo Soliven said the Grade 8 student accused of carrying out the shooting at the school was considered “one of the brightest” students in his grade level and had graduated as grade school valedictorian at Ateneo. Soliven emphasized the importance of a whole-of-community approach to educating and guiding children, saying a child’s behavior is shaped not only by the school but also by how they are raised and guided at home. The incident at the university’s junior high school campus in Barangay Tumaga on Tuesday, Aug. 18, left two students dead, including the alleged shooter. | Chim Cantos,

NewsWatch Plus PH

41,461 views • 1 month ago

Sen. Senator Robin Padilla is calling for immediate action on laws covering minors and social media following the deadly shooting at Ateneo de Zamboanga University Junior High School in Zamboanga City on Tuesday, August 18. He argued that online platforms can heavily influence young people and urged authorities and lawmakers to reassess how children are allowed to use them. The attack left two students dead, including the Grade 9 student identified by police as the gunman and a Grade 10 student he shot. Two others were injured. Authorities said the attacker brought firearms onto campus and livestreamed parts of the incident using a body-worn camera before dying at the scene. Padilla said social media can give young people a platform where violent thoughts can be acted out or displayed. He also said the kind of brutal violence now being seen among young people reminded him of crimes he witnessed while detained in Bilibid, renewing his push for stronger restrictions on minors’ access to social media. Investigators have yet to determine what drove the attack. Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla said authorities are reviewing the gunman’s gaming and chat history as part of a broader forensic examination, stressing that conclusions on motive should only come after the investigation is complete. The shooting was the Philippines’ second fatal school shooting in less than two months, intensifying questions over school security, young people’s access to firearms and the role online platforms may play in violent behavior. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has ordered a full investigation as authorities work to establish what led to the attack and how another tragedy can be prevented.

Sen. Senator Robin Padilla is calling for immediate action on laws covering minors and social media following the deadly shooting at Ateneo de Zamboanga University Junior High School in Zamboanga City on Tuesday, August 18. He argued that online platforms can heavily influence young people and urged authorities and lawmakers to reassess how children are allowed to use them. The attack left two students dead, including the Grade 9 student identified by police as the gunman and a Grade 10 student he shot. Two others were injured. Authorities said the attacker brought firearms onto campus and livestreamed parts of the incident using a body-worn camera before dying at the scene. Padilla said social media can give young people a platform where violent thoughts can be acted out or displayed. He also said the kind of brutal violence now being seen among young people reminded him of crimes he witnessed while detained in Bilibid, renewing his push for stronger restrictions on minors’ access to social media. Investigators have yet to determine what drove the attack. Interior Secretary Jonvic Remulla said authorities are reviewing the gunman’s gaming and chat history as part of a broader forensic examination, stressing that conclusions on motive should only come after the investigation is complete. The shooting was the Philippines’ second fatal school shooting in less than two months, intensifying questions over school security, young people’s access to firearms and the role online platforms may play in violent behavior. President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. has ordered a full investigation as authorities work to establish what led to the attack and how another tragedy can be prevented.

Peanut Gallery Media Network

29,841 views • 1 month ago

👇Reports from BBC Persian & other sources indicate that this incident involving a young Iranian woman was a tragic mental health crisis. After removing her underwear, she was detained & reportedly taken to a psychiatric facility. Per BBC Persian: "Two eyewitnesses, who were present during the incident, shared details with BBC Persian that differ from accounts of an altercation with security. They said the girl ‘unexpectedly entered several classrooms holding a mobile phone, as if she was recording students.’ According to them, an instructor, upset by her unauthorized entry, sent a student to ask her intentions. However, one witness reported that upon encountering students, she ‘started screaming.’ One of the witnesses told BBC that when they reached the courtyard, they saw the girl had undressed. According to these witnesses, there was ‘no confrontation between the girl and security.’ However, they only witnessed the girl’s unexpected entrance into classrooms. They said they are unaware of what transpired before she entered the classrooms or what occurred between her exit from the building and her undressing in the courtyard. These eyewitnesses arrived after she had removed her clothes in the courtyard. According to them, the girl told students inside the building, ‘I came to save you.’ A social media user on X, who appears to be a university student, posted that she said, ‘I came to save you.’ University and Iranian Media Response Amir Mahjoub, the Public Relations and Protocol Manager of Azad University, denied any confrontation between the girl, whom he referred to as a student, and university security in a post on X. Mahjoub stated that he was present at the police station after her arrest and reported, ‘Her physical condition was confirmed as fully stable by emergency responders.’ Mahjoub then explained: ‘Investigations reveal that due to a mental health issue, she began filming her classmates and instructor, prompting objections. This has happened before. When faced with protests from students and security, she quickly reached the courtyard and acted disrespectfully... What actually transpired indicates that her indecent behavior was not due to hijab enforcement but resulted from students and security objecting to her unauthorized filming and photographing, violating the privacy of students and instructors.’ Iranian media, including ISNA, also reported that this ‘student,’ after filming students, faced objections and subsequently undressed in response to these objections. They cited Azad University, stating that ‘this student is under severe psychological distress and has been transferred to a treatment facility.’” Link:

👇Reports from BBC Persian & other sources indicate that this incident involving a young Iranian woman was a tragic mental health crisis. After removing her underwear, she was detained & reportedly taken to a psychiatric facility. Per BBC Persian: "Two eyewitnesses, who were present during the incident, shared details with BBC Persian that differ from accounts of an altercation with security. They said the girl ‘unexpectedly entered several classrooms holding a mobile phone, as if she was recording students.’ According to them, an instructor, upset by her unauthorized entry, sent a student to ask her intentions. However, one witness reported that upon encountering students, she ‘started screaming.’ One of the witnesses told BBC that when they reached the courtyard, they saw the girl had undressed. According to these witnesses, there was ‘no confrontation between the girl and security.’ However, they only witnessed the girl’s unexpected entrance into classrooms. They said they are unaware of what transpired before she entered the classrooms or what occurred between her exit from the building and her undressing in the courtyard. These eyewitnesses arrived after she had removed her clothes in the courtyard. According to them, the girl told students inside the building, ‘I came to save you.’ A social media user on X, who appears to be a university student, posted that she said, ‘I came to save you.’ University and Iranian Media Response Amir Mahjoub, the Public Relations and Protocol Manager of Azad University, denied any confrontation between the girl, whom he referred to as a student, and university security in a post on X. Mahjoub stated that he was present at the police station after her arrest and reported, ‘Her physical condition was confirmed as fully stable by emergency responders.’ Mahjoub then explained: ‘Investigations reveal that due to a mental health issue, she began filming her classmates and instructor, prompting objections. This has happened before. When faced with protests from students and security, she quickly reached the courtyard and acted disrespectfully... What actually transpired indicates that her indecent behavior was not due to hijab enforcement but resulted from students and security objecting to her unauthorized filming and photographing, violating the privacy of students and instructors.’ Iranian media, including ISNA, also reported that this ‘student,’ after filming students, faced objections and subsequently undressed in response to these objections. They cited Azad University, stating that ‘this student is under severe psychological distress and has been transferred to a treatment facility.’” Link:

Sina Toossi

121,581 views • 1 year ago

Safety Checks Carried Out at Pattaya Entertainment Venues Following Deadly Bangkok Fire Following the deadly fire at an entertainment venue in Soi Lat Phrao 1, Bangkok, which claimed multiple lives and raised nationwide concerns about safety standards at nightlife venues, Chonburi Governor Naris Niramaiwong has ordered all relevant agencies to intensify inspections of entertainment businesses across the province. The focus is on Pattaya, one of Thailand’s busiest tourist destinations, where large numbers of visitors use nightlife venues every day. At 8.30pm on July 13, 2026, Chonburi Deputy Governor Isara Charoenchasri led a multi-agency inspection team in Pattaya. Joining him were Bang Lamung District Chief Anusak Piriyamorn, Pattaya City Police Chief Pol. Col. Anek Sarathongyu, Pattaya Deputy City Clerk Kiatsak Sriwongchai, Tourist Police, district administration officials, and other relevant agencies. The inspections were carried out under the governor’s directive, with officers examining emergency escape routes, exit signage, emergency lighting systems, and fire extinguishers to improve safety for residents and tourists. A total of seven entertainment venues were inspected, including three venues outside designated entertainment zones and four within licensed entertainment zones. The inspections also covered several large venues along Walking Street in South Pattaya, one of the city’s busiest tourist areas. Officials found a number of safety deficiencies at several venues. These included an insufficient number of emergency exit signs, too few fire extinguishers for the size of the premises, and inadequate emergency lighting systems. Business operators were instructed to correct the issues immediately, while Pattaya City officials and the Bang Lamung District Office were ordered to conduct follow-up inspections to ensure compliance. Deputy Governor Isara Charoenchasri said the inspections were ordered in response to the devastating Bangkok fire, which resulted in significant loss of life. He said Chonburi Province is particularly concerned because Pattaya has a high concentration of entertainment venues and attracts large numbers of tourists. He explained that inspections are focusing on building readiness, including emergency escape routes, fire suppression equipment, obstacles blocking evacuation paths, and interior decorative materials which may increase the risk of fire. Operators have been instructed to bring their premises up to safety standards as quickly as possible to reduce risks in the event of an emergency. He stressed that protecting both residents and tourists remains the province’s highest priority and is essential to maintaining confidence in Pattaya’s reputation as a safe international tourism destination. 🎬 Pattaya News Online #ข่าวด่วน #ไฟไหม้ #กรุงเทพมหานคร #ไฟไหม้ผับลาดพร้าว #ไฟไหม้กรุงเทพ #Bangkok #Pattaya

Safety Checks Carried Out at Pattaya Entertainment Venues Following Deadly Bangkok Fire Following the deadly fire at an entertainment venue in Soi Lat Phrao 1, Bangkok, which claimed multiple lives and raised nationwide concerns about safety standards at nightlife venues, Chonburi Governor Naris Niramaiwong has ordered all relevant agencies to intensify inspections of entertainment businesses across the province. The focus is on Pattaya, one of Thailand’s busiest tourist destinations, where large numbers of visitors use nightlife venues every day. At 8.30pm on July 13, 2026, Chonburi Deputy Governor Isara Charoenchasri led a multi-agency inspection team in Pattaya. Joining him were Bang Lamung District Chief Anusak Piriyamorn, Pattaya City Police Chief Pol. Col. Anek Sarathongyu, Pattaya Deputy City Clerk Kiatsak Sriwongchai, Tourist Police, district administration officials, and other relevant agencies. The inspections were carried out under the governor’s directive, with officers examining emergency escape routes, exit signage, emergency lighting systems, and fire extinguishers to improve safety for residents and tourists. A total of seven entertainment venues were inspected, including three venues outside designated entertainment zones and four within licensed entertainment zones. The inspections also covered several large venues along Walking Street in South Pattaya, one of the city’s busiest tourist areas. Officials found a number of safety deficiencies at several venues. These included an insufficient number of emergency exit signs, too few fire extinguishers for the size of the premises, and inadequate emergency lighting systems. Business operators were instructed to correct the issues immediately, while Pattaya City officials and the Bang Lamung District Office were ordered to conduct follow-up inspections to ensure compliance. Deputy Governor Isara Charoenchasri said the inspections were ordered in response to the devastating Bangkok fire, which resulted in significant loss of life. He said Chonburi Province is particularly concerned because Pattaya has a high concentration of entertainment venues and attracts large numbers of tourists. He explained that inspections are focusing on building readiness, including emergency escape routes, fire suppression equipment, obstacles blocking evacuation paths, and interior decorative materials which may increase the risk of fire. Operators have been instructed to bring their premises up to safety standards as quickly as possible to reduce risks in the event of an emergency. He stressed that protecting both residents and tourists remains the province’s highest priority and is essential to maintaining confidence in Pattaya’s reputation as a safe international tourism destination. 🎬 Pattaya News Online #ข่าวด่วน #ไฟไหม้ #กรุงเทพมหานคร #ไฟไหม้ผับลาดพร้าว #ไฟไหม้กรุงเทพ #Bangkok #Pattaya

Chrome Crumpet

17,642 views • 2 months ago

Abati is trending because Arise TV’s Reuben Abati has dared Akpabio to impeach Tinubu for disrespecting the constitution. Abati stated that, Tinubu solely decided to make himself the Dictator of Rivers State, suspending the governor, the deputy and the legislative. Which is totally illegal in the 99 constitution. By which, Tinubu commited an impeachable offense, removing Sim Fubara and installing a military administrator in charge of Rivers State without NASS approval. He argued that, Tinubu cited Section 305. But failed to recognize Section 188 which stated that, only the NASS and AGF can remove an elected official. — Not the President. That’s why when Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency over insecurity in three northern states, including Borno, Adamawa and Yobe., he didn’t suspend the government. Unlike Obasanjo who did it in Ekiti and Plateau, although illegally, which doesn’t make right. Obj legal adviser then, argued that they acted based on the 1961 constitution, not 1999. Abati insisted, Tinubu commited an impeachable offense by acting against the Nigerian constitution. But APC folks, believe Abati is misinterpreting the laws because he worked under Goodluck Jonathan as his Senior Adviser on Media. Actually, for short.. According to the constitution, Abati is right. The president cannot remove an elected official, Obasanjo doing it was illegal. Also, the conditions for a State of emergency to be declared, were not fully met. Since it was an “emergency”, when the President declared SOE, to suspend the officials, he should have recommended it to the Senate who should have approved it almost instantly, since it was an “Emergency”. But, the Senate did not approve the SOE. Which they have two days, and 10 days to do. Essentially invalidating every sense of “Emergency” in the State. Again, validating that there was no cause to suspend the Governor, Deputy or Legislative. If the senate doesn’t approve the SOE in 9 days, the SOE won’t stand. Today, NASS didn’t talk about the SOE, they moved it to tomorrow, Thursday. Albeit, President Tinubu has sworn in Navy Chief, Admiral Ibokette Ibas, as the administrator for Rivers State. And according to reports, Rivers FAAC allocations will be released to him. This was blocked by Supreme Court, pending Fubara’s re-presentation of the budget. Pres. Tinubu will make laws for Rivers, through the FEC. — Illegal. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations!

Abati is trending because Arise TV’s Reuben Abati has dared Akpabio to impeach Tinubu for disrespecting the constitution. Abati stated that, Tinubu solely decided to make himself the Dictator of Rivers State, suspending the governor, the deputy and the legislative. Which is totally illegal in the 99 constitution. By which, Tinubu commited an impeachable offense, removing Sim Fubara and installing a military administrator in charge of Rivers State without NASS approval. He argued that, Tinubu cited Section 305. But failed to recognize Section 188 which stated that, only the NASS and AGF can remove an elected official. — Not the President. That’s why when Goodluck Jonathan declared a state of emergency over insecurity in three northern states, including Borno, Adamawa and Yobe., he didn’t suspend the government. Unlike Obasanjo who did it in Ekiti and Plateau, although illegally, which doesn’t make right. Obj legal adviser then, argued that they acted based on the 1961 constitution, not 1999. Abati insisted, Tinubu commited an impeachable offense by acting against the Nigerian constitution. But APC folks, believe Abati is misinterpreting the laws because he worked under Goodluck Jonathan as his Senior Adviser on Media. Actually, for short.. According to the constitution, Abati is right. The president cannot remove an elected official, Obasanjo doing it was illegal. Also, the conditions for a State of emergency to be declared, were not fully met. Since it was an “emergency”, when the President declared SOE, to suspend the officials, he should have recommended it to the Senate who should have approved it almost instantly, since it was an “Emergency”. But, the Senate did not approve the SOE. Which they have two days, and 10 days to do. Essentially invalidating every sense of “Emergency” in the State. Again, validating that there was no cause to suspend the Governor, Deputy or Legislative. If the senate doesn’t approve the SOE in 9 days, the SOE won’t stand. Today, NASS didn’t talk about the SOE, they moved it to tomorrow, Thursday. Albeit, President Tinubu has sworn in Navy Chief, Admiral Ibokette Ibas, as the administrator for Rivers State. And according to reports, Rivers FAAC allocations will be released to him. This was blocked by Supreme Court, pending Fubara’s re-presentation of the budget. Pres. Tinubu will make laws for Rivers, through the FEC. — Illegal. Follow Trending Explained for daily explanations!

Trending Explained

78,556 views • 1 year ago

Chair Luistro: VP answer to impeachment raps reads like prohibited motion to dismiss HOUSE Committee on Justice Chair Atty. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro of Batangas on Tuesday said the response submitted by Vice President Sara Z. Duterte to the impeachment complaints against her “doesn’t seem like an answer” and instead appears to be a prohibited pleading under House rules. Luistro said her reading of the Vice President’s filing raised serious procedural concerns. “Apparently for me, it doesn’t seem like an answer. While I was reading the answer, it looks like a motion to dismiss,” Luistro said in a radio interview. Luistro pointed out that such a pleading is not allowed in impeachment proceedings. “At maliwanag sa ating rules of impeachment ng House of Representatives that motion to dismiss is a prohibited pleading dito sa impeachment proceeding,” Luistro added. Luistro said the submission failed to directly address the accusations laid out in the complaints. “At least if I base it on the allegations contained in the answer, hindi siya responsive dun sa grounds, dun sa offenses alleged in the impeachment complaint. In effect, parang hindi sumagot and instead they are questioning the proceeding before the Justice Committee in support of their intention to dismiss the impeachment complaint,” Luistro said. Luistro also said the committee could treat the Vice President’s filing as a general denial, noting that the lack of a direct response may leave the allegations standing. “Ngayon considering that the answer is not responsive to the complaint, it appears like unrebutted ang mga allegations ng complainant,” she said. “Kumbaga since hindi sinagot directly, it is as if tinanggap ang allegations na ito and we will be perceiving this as general denial ng mga allegations doon sa complaint,” Luistro said. She maintained that the House panel had already established the sufficiency of the complaints during earlier deliberations, stressing that the respondent was given the opportunity to answer the charges. “We respect the opinion of the camp of the Vice President but of course we’ve been very cautious in the compliance to our rules,” Luistro said.

Chair Luistro: VP answer to impeachment raps reads like prohibited motion to dismiss HOUSE Committee on Justice Chair Atty. Gerville “Jinky Bitrics” Luistro of Batangas on Tuesday said the response submitted by Vice President Sara Z. Duterte to the impeachment complaints against her “doesn’t seem like an answer” and instead appears to be a prohibited pleading under House rules. Luistro said her reading of the Vice President’s filing raised serious procedural concerns. “Apparently for me, it doesn’t seem like an answer. While I was reading the answer, it looks like a motion to dismiss,” Luistro said in a radio interview. Luistro pointed out that such a pleading is not allowed in impeachment proceedings. “At maliwanag sa ating rules of impeachment ng House of Representatives that motion to dismiss is a prohibited pleading dito sa impeachment proceeding,” Luistro added. Luistro said the submission failed to directly address the accusations laid out in the complaints. “At least if I base it on the allegations contained in the answer, hindi siya responsive dun sa grounds, dun sa offenses alleged in the impeachment complaint. In effect, parang hindi sumagot and instead they are questioning the proceeding before the Justice Committee in support of their intention to dismiss the impeachment complaint,” Luistro said. Luistro also said the committee could treat the Vice President’s filing as a general denial, noting that the lack of a direct response may leave the allegations standing. “Ngayon considering that the answer is not responsive to the complaint, it appears like unrebutted ang mga allegations ng complainant,” she said. “Kumbaga since hindi sinagot directly, it is as if tinanggap ang allegations na ito and we will be perceiving this as general denial ng mga allegations doon sa complaint,” Luistro said. She maintained that the House panel had already established the sufficiency of the complaints during earlier deliberations, stressing that the respondent was given the opportunity to answer the charges. “We respect the opinion of the camp of the Vice President but of course we’ve been very cautious in the compliance to our rules,” Luistro said.

🇵🇭 Laitera🇵🇭

13,155 views • 6 months ago

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Senior Forensic Pathologist calls the possibility that Mr Henry Katanga was shot and killed by his wife Molly Katanga, “extremely slim and highly unlikely”. He said the case before Justice Rosette Comfort Kania is not a homicide but a homicide-suicide where Mr Henry Katanga beat his wife, thought she was dead then sat or stood on the bed and shot himself. He lambasted the postmortem report presented by the state to back up their case as a “very dangerous postmortem report that couldn’t have passed peer review” in a serious entity. Dr Sylvester Onzivua was the first defense witness in this trial. He holds a Degree in Medicine and Surgery, from Makerere University (1993), a Masters of Medicine in Pathology (2003), a Post Graduate Diploma in Forensic medicine from the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa (2005). He’s also trained in Forensic Anthropology from Durban. He worked with Mulago Hospital, attached to the Department of Pathology of Makerere University and part of his deployment was in the City Mortuary where he was the Head of City Mortuary. He worked there from 2005 up to 2013. He said he has testified in numerous cases, mostly for the prosecution, including in the military courts. In a session whose start was marked by early heated exchanges between defense attorney Elison Karuhanga and Chief State Attorney Jonathan Muwaganya, Dr Onzivua took on the mantle of courtroom forensic pathology Prof, basically reliving a teaching role he continues to play in real life at Makerere University, even after his retirement. Early court proceedings were anything but smooth, with the Judge calling both sets of lawyers to her chambers for more than 2 hours because the state was adamant that Dr Onzivua shouldn’t use the postmortem report on court file but should instead use copies availed to him by the defense. On resumption and with a 50 slide PowerPoint presentation, Dr Onzivua took Justice Kania through the science of bullets and bullet injuries. He told her how to tell a bullet entry wound from an exit wound. He then used images of the late Henry Katanga, taken during postmortem, to show that the pathologists who conducted that postmortem wrote an erroneous report that misled the court to think the bullet that killed Mr Katanga went from left to right as opposed to what he said was a scientifically incontrovertible conclusion that the bullet direction was right to left. This point is very key because when Justice Kania put Mrs Katanga to her defense, she relied in part on prosecution evidence that claimed that Mr Katanga was shot on the left side of his head and since he was right handed, this would be very difficult. Dr Onzivua scoffed at that and using a combination of human props and postmortem images, he showed that indeed the state had it wrong; that it was scientifically wrong to conclude as they did. He pointed to the absence of tattooing, lacerations on the hole on the left side of Mr Katanga’s head and wondered why the state pathologists concluded that it was an entry hole despite showing all characteristics of an exit hole. He said there’s “no tattooing, no blackening, no muzzle imprint on a close contact bullet entry wound? So how, how, hoooow would they have called this an entry wound in the absence of blackening, tattooing or muzzle imprint? There’s no scientific basis of calling the wound on the left an entry wound.” “The wound on the right was stated to be 5cm by 3cm and this was described as an exit wound. The entire dimensions of the ear were taken and then stated to be the dimensions of the exit wound. This, scientifically is not correct. The true dimensions of the skull defect on the right side were not taken and there is therefore no scientific basis to call it an exit wound. A comparison of the right and left ear shows blackening on the right and none on the left. On the contrary, the external features of the wound on the right side are those of an entry hole” Cont’d…

UgandaVsMollyKatanga Senior Forensic Pathologist calls the possibility that Mr Henry Katanga was shot and killed by his wife Molly Katanga, “extremely slim and highly unlikely”. He said the case before Justice Rosette Comfort Kania is not a homicide but a homicide-suicide where Mr Henry Katanga beat his wife, thought she was dead then sat or stood on the bed and shot himself. He lambasted the postmortem report presented by the state to back up their case as a “very dangerous postmortem report that couldn’t have passed peer review” in a serious entity. Dr Sylvester Onzivua was the first defense witness in this trial. He holds a Degree in Medicine and Surgery, from Makerere University (1993), a Masters of Medicine in Pathology (2003), a Post Graduate Diploma in Forensic medicine from the Colleges of Medicine of South Africa (2005). He’s also trained in Forensic Anthropology from Durban. He worked with Mulago Hospital, attached to the Department of Pathology of Makerere University and part of his deployment was in the City Mortuary where he was the Head of City Mortuary. He worked there from 2005 up to 2013. He said he has testified in numerous cases, mostly for the prosecution, including in the military courts. In a session whose start was marked by early heated exchanges between defense attorney Elison Karuhanga and Chief State Attorney Jonathan Muwaganya, Dr Onzivua took on the mantle of courtroom forensic pathology Prof, basically reliving a teaching role he continues to play in real life at Makerere University, even after his retirement. Early court proceedings were anything but smooth, with the Judge calling both sets of lawyers to her chambers for more than 2 hours because the state was adamant that Dr Onzivua shouldn’t use the postmortem report on court file but should instead use copies availed to him by the defense. On resumption and with a 50 slide PowerPoint presentation, Dr Onzivua took Justice Kania through the science of bullets and bullet injuries. He told her how to tell a bullet entry wound from an exit wound. He then used images of the late Henry Katanga, taken during postmortem, to show that the pathologists who conducted that postmortem wrote an erroneous report that misled the court to think the bullet that killed Mr Katanga went from left to right as opposed to what he said was a scientifically incontrovertible conclusion that the bullet direction was right to left. This point is very key because when Justice Kania put Mrs Katanga to her defense, she relied in part on prosecution evidence that claimed that Mr Katanga was shot on the left side of his head and since he was right handed, this would be very difficult. Dr Onzivua scoffed at that and using a combination of human props and postmortem images, he showed that indeed the state had it wrong; that it was scientifically wrong to conclude as they did. He pointed to the absence of tattooing, lacerations on the hole on the left side of Mr Katanga’s head and wondered why the state pathologists concluded that it was an entry hole despite showing all characteristics of an exit hole. He said there’s “no tattooing, no blackening, no muzzle imprint on a close contact bullet entry wound? So how, how, hoooow would they have called this an entry wound in the absence of blackening, tattooing or muzzle imprint? There’s no scientific basis of calling the wound on the left an entry wound.” “The wound on the right was stated to be 5cm by 3cm and this was described as an exit wound. The entire dimensions of the ear were taken and then stated to be the dimensions of the exit wound. This, scientifically is not correct. The true dimensions of the skull defect on the right side were not taken and there is therefore no scientific basis to call it an exit wound. A comparison of the right and left ear shows blackening on the right and none on the left. On the contrary, the external features of the wound on the right side are those of an entry hole” Cont’d…

Anthony Natif

40,323 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Mumbai | Vaibhavi, who visited the beach shack Romeo Lane Vagator owned by the detained Luthra brothers in November, said, "I visited Romeo Lane in Vagator on 1st November with my cousins. We were 13 people in total... The club is built in such a way that it is very suffocating. It has only one entry and one exit, and that too at a height. So it is tough to enter and exit from that club. The staff spoke to us rudely and behaved inappropriately... When we were leaving the club around 3 am, a heavy chair was in our way. My cousin shifted it aside with his foot... The manager came to us and said, 'You are damaging the furniture; we should have thrown you out earlier. You don't have the status to be here.' He grabbed my cousin's collar and started speaking to us rudely. When we tried to apologise and leave, he called all the security personnel, the bouncers. They started chasing us and raised their hands at us. Since it was tough to leave that club, they chased us down and hit people in groups. They hit my sister on the chest, pushed her so badly that she fell down the stairs... They put up a barricade at the entry gate so we couldn't leave... When my brother removed it, a bouncer ran towards him with a rod and started hitting him badly... When I pushed the boiuncer to stop him, he hit me too... They were using such bad language towards us that I had never heard before... Since everyone was badly hurt, we decided to go to the Police station in the morning and not right away. I informed the Police, and they told us to come to the Anjuna Police Station the next day... Somehow, an FIR was filed after a lot of effort. I had included the names of both owners in my complaint, but the Police later removed them, saying they were not physically present when this incident occurred, so they are not at fault... If you don't take women's safety and tourist safety seriously, such incidents will keep happening in Goa..." (11.12)

#WATCH | Mumbai | Vaibhavi, who visited the beach shack Romeo Lane Vagator owned by the detained Luthra brothers in November, said, "I visited Romeo Lane in Vagator on 1st November with my cousins. We were 13 people in total... The club is built in such a way that it is very suffocating. It has only one entry and one exit, and that too at a height. So it is tough to enter and exit from that club. The staff spoke to us rudely and behaved inappropriately... When we were leaving the club around 3 am, a heavy chair was in our way. My cousin shifted it aside with his foot... The manager came to us and said, 'You are damaging the furniture; we should have thrown you out earlier. You don't have the status to be here.' He grabbed my cousin's collar and started speaking to us rudely. When we tried to apologise and leave, he called all the security personnel, the bouncers. They started chasing us and raised their hands at us. Since it was tough to leave that club, they chased us down and hit people in groups. They hit my sister on the chest, pushed her so badly that she fell down the stairs... They put up a barricade at the entry gate so we couldn't leave... When my brother removed it, a bouncer ran towards him with a rod and started hitting him badly... When I pushed the boiuncer to stop him, he hit me too... They were using such bad language towards us that I had never heard before... Since everyone was badly hurt, we decided to go to the Police station in the morning and not right away. I informed the Police, and they told us to come to the Anjuna Police Station the next day... Somehow, an FIR was filed after a lot of effort. I had included the names of both owners in my complaint, but the Police later removed them, saying they were not physically present when this incident occurred, so they are not at fault... If you don't take women's safety and tourist safety seriously, such incidents will keep happening in Goa..." (11.12)

ANI

413,239 views • 9 months ago

‼️EXCLUSIVE: Yellow School Bus VISIBLE Outside Timpanogos Hospital On September 10th — Does This Confirm Candace’s Tip That PATIENTS WERE BUSSED? A witness who was locked inside Timpanogos Regional Hospital with his family the day Charlie was killed just provided me the original raw footage. In the video, filmed from their room upstairs, a yellow school bus is clearly sitting outside the hospital. This is a big deal. Candace Owens previously reported a tip that ER patients at Timpanogos were transferred by shuttle/bus to Utah Valley Hospital that day — with the transfers allegedly beginning around 11:30 a.m., before Charlie was even shot. If TRUE that would indicate foreknowledge and a much bigger conspiracy then just a lone wolf shooter. The presence of a school bus on the property in this exclusive footage appears to corroborate that patients were being moved by bus. The witness also confirmed several other key details: The hospital was placed on full lockdown after Charlie arrived. He entered through the main front entrance. When he tried to leave, police stopped him and forced him back upstairs. When they were finally allowed out, they had to exit through a strange rear entrance. All ambulances were being diverted away from Timpanogos to Utah Valley Hospital. Metadata confirms the video was recorded at 5:18 PM local Utah time on September 10, 2025, from GPS coordinates matching Timpanogos Regional Hospital. We still don’t know the exact timeline of when the busing began, but the fact that a school bus is visible on the grounds that afternoon is significant and demands further scrutiny. Full original file provided exclusively to me and i will be interviewing him tomorrow night to get his full story so stay tuned, more details coming after I speak with him further. Everyone go give this guy a FOLLOW Lit Mormon ⚛️ and thank him for coming forawrd. 😢

‼️EXCLUSIVE: Yellow School Bus VISIBLE Outside Timpanogos Hospital On September 10th — Does This Confirm Candace’s Tip That PATIENTS WERE BUSSED? A witness who was locked inside Timpanogos Regional Hospital with his family the day Charlie was killed just provided me the original raw footage. In the video, filmed from their room upstairs, a yellow school bus is clearly sitting outside the hospital. This is a big deal. Candace Owens previously reported a tip that ER patients at Timpanogos were transferred by shuttle/bus to Utah Valley Hospital that day — with the transfers allegedly beginning around 11:30 a.m., before Charlie was even shot. If TRUE that would indicate foreknowledge and a much bigger conspiracy then just a lone wolf shooter. The presence of a school bus on the property in this exclusive footage appears to corroborate that patients were being moved by bus. The witness also confirmed several other key details: The hospital was placed on full lockdown after Charlie arrived. He entered through the main front entrance. When he tried to leave, police stopped him and forced him back upstairs. When they were finally allowed out, they had to exit through a strange rear entrance. All ambulances were being diverted away from Timpanogos to Utah Valley Hospital. Metadata confirms the video was recorded at 5:18 PM local Utah time on September 10, 2025, from GPS coordinates matching Timpanogos Regional Hospital. We still don’t know the exact timeline of when the busing began, but the fact that a school bus is visible on the grounds that afternoon is significant and demands further scrutiny. Full original file provided exclusively to me and i will be interviewing him tomorrow night to get his full story so stay tuned, more details coming after I speak with him further. Everyone go give this guy a FOLLOW Lit Mormon ⚛️ and thank him for coming forawrd. 😢

Project Constitution

165,742 views • 1 month ago

I HAVE BECOME F*CKING USELESS, TEN GPT6-ASTRA AGENTS TOOK $52 TO $11,345.95 WITHOUT ME after trading memecoins on Robinhood for 13 hours, they closed with a balance of $11,345.95 when I handed them the terminal, there was one instruction: pay for your own Ultra subscription for the next year or I shut you down I did not touch the mouse once during the entire run here is how the log recorded that insane night: → 16:05 TOKYO found a fresh contract where volume started building before price and passed it to the Professor → 16:07 PALERMO blocked the first entry because there was not enough liquidity for a safe exit → 17:14 BERLIN wrote down the exact conditions that would return the setup to the crew → 18:43 RIO caught the pullback, marked invalidation and kept the chart open instead of chasing → 20:11 DENVER compared the spike in X and Telegram mentions with on-chain volume and filtered out the paid noise → 21:37 LISBON caught a stale holder snapshot in the handoff and sent the entire setup back for another check → 22:52 STOCKHOLM tested pool depth and slippage, then reduced the next position to fit the available exit → 00:53 NAIROBI compressed every cleared signal into one brief and handed the final decision to Astra → 02:47 HELSINKI logged every open position, its exit conditions and every change made during the shift → 05:05 THE PROFESSOR closed the 13-hour operation and returned one report with the terminal balance at $11,345.95 I wrote Palermo's rules myself and still got pissed when he blocked the first entry the chart started flying without us the crew did not chase it they waited for the pullback, checked the exit again and entered only after the original weakness disappeared 13 hours later: $52 → $11,345.95 it is not about one smarter model, although Astra is still incredible it is ten smaller jobs passing the same decision forward the article below contains the entire build, every role and every rule save it and build your own dream team what are u still doing by hand at 4am? do u really think they cannot handle it?

I HAVE BECOME F*CKING USELESS, TEN GPT6-ASTRA AGENTS TOOK $52 TO $11,345.95 WITHOUT ME after trading memecoins on Robinhood for 13 hours, they closed with a balance of $11,345.95 when I handed them the terminal, there was one instruction: pay for your own Ultra subscription for the next year or I shut you down I did not touch the mouse once during the entire run here is how the log recorded that insane night: → 16:05 TOKYO found a fresh contract where volume started building before price and passed it to the Professor → 16:07 PALERMO blocked the first entry because there was not enough liquidity for a safe exit → 17:14 BERLIN wrote down the exact conditions that would return the setup to the crew → 18:43 RIO caught the pullback, marked invalidation and kept the chart open instead of chasing → 20:11 DENVER compared the spike in X and Telegram mentions with on-chain volume and filtered out the paid noise → 21:37 LISBON caught a stale holder snapshot in the handoff and sent the entire setup back for another check → 22:52 STOCKHOLM tested pool depth and slippage, then reduced the next position to fit the available exit → 00:53 NAIROBI compressed every cleared signal into one brief and handed the final decision to Astra → 02:47 HELSINKI logged every open position, its exit conditions and every change made during the shift → 05:05 THE PROFESSOR closed the 13-hour operation and returned one report with the terminal balance at $11,345.95 I wrote Palermo's rules myself and still got pissed when he blocked the first entry the chart started flying without us the crew did not chase it they waited for the pullback, checked the exit again and entered only after the original weakness disappeared 13 hours later: $52 → $11,345.95 it is not about one smarter model, although Astra is still incredible it is ten smaller jobs passing the same decision forward the article below contains the entire build, every role and every rule save it and build your own dream team what are u still doing by hand at 4am? do u really think they cannot handle it?

Logics

1,202,964 views • 14 days ago

If you wanna know what they’re looking for I have the answers to most of your questions. What they’re looking for is secondary bullet fragmentation. I strongly believe that they are looking for a secondary bullet fragments. In the first video, you’ll see proof that the front wound on the victim is an exit. As the bullet bounced off the table and hit the security guard. The second video shows some of the police/security from Charlie’s team congregating right where the man was struck then you will see them looking around, and then the officer grabs the microphone and pointed in the same direction that it appears that the secondary fragmentation may have flew off after it struck the security guard non-penetrating strike. The third video is showing more detail from when the security was struck with the secondary fragment it hit him so hard. It gave him a Charlie horse pun intended. But it hit him so hard he couldn’t use his arm to jump that gate. You could see him trying to slip it through in between the security gates and that’s the reason why his watch got scuffed and damaged. The screenshot is showing a better view of the officer saying this way that way if the shot came from the Losee Center then why are they directing people towards that direction? The enter is is he’s telling the other people that are congregated by the gate. That way it went that way I believe that is exactly what’s going on there.

If you wanna know what they’re looking for I have the answers to most of your questions. What they’re looking for is secondary bullet fragmentation. I strongly believe that they are looking for a secondary bullet fragments. In the first video, you’ll see proof that the front wound on the victim is an exit. As the bullet bounced off the table and hit the security guard. The second video shows some of the police/security from Charlie’s team congregating right where the man was struck then you will see them looking around, and then the officer grabs the microphone and pointed in the same direction that it appears that the secondary fragmentation may have flew off after it struck the security guard non-penetrating strike. The third video is showing more detail from when the security was struck with the secondary fragment it hit him so hard. It gave him a Charlie horse pun intended. But it hit him so hard he couldn’t use his arm to jump that gate. You could see him trying to slip it through in between the security gates and that’s the reason why his watch got scuffed and damaged. The screenshot is showing a better view of the officer saying this way that way if the shot came from the Losee Center then why are they directing people towards that direction? The enter is is he’s telling the other people that are congregated by the gate. That way it went that way I believe that is exactly what’s going on there.

ClydeMax369

18,635 views • 3 months ago

The1957News has received exclusive footage showing some alleged National Security officers assaulting staff of the Ministry of Energy. The incident is said to have occurred at Kasoa Amanfrom on the morning of Thursday, January 15, 2026. According to an eyewitness account, some staff of the Energy Ministry, while traveling from Kasoa to the office on board an official bus, came across a pickup truck parked very close to the middle of the road, making it difficult for the Ministry’s staff bus to exit into the main road. Upon the bus exiting into the main road, a staff member on board the bus informed the driver of the pickup that he had parked wrongly. When the bus moved, the pickup allegedly followed and crossed the Ministry’s bus at top speed. The driver of the bus maneuvered but was crossed a second time. The video from the incident shows the occupants of the pickup truck, who are alleged to be National Security officers, attacking some members of the Ministry through the window of the bus. They are then seen forcing their way onto the bus and assaulting occupants of the bus. According to a source at the Energy Ministry, the alleged National Security officers, after assaulting three persons on the bus, including the driver, dragged one staff member off the bus. According to the source, the whereabouts of the staff member who was taken away is currently unknown.

The1957News has received exclusive footage showing some alleged National Security officers assaulting staff of the Ministry of Energy. The incident is said to have occurred at Kasoa Amanfrom on the morning of Thursday, January 15, 2026. According to an eyewitness account, some staff of the Energy Ministry, while traveling from Kasoa to the office on board an official bus, came across a pickup truck parked very close to the middle of the road, making it difficult for the Ministry’s staff bus to exit into the main road. Upon the bus exiting into the main road, a staff member on board the bus informed the driver of the pickup that he had parked wrongly. When the bus moved, the pickup allegedly followed and crossed the Ministry’s bus at top speed. The driver of the bus maneuvered but was crossed a second time. The video from the incident shows the occupants of the pickup truck, who are alleged to be National Security officers, attacking some members of the Ministry through the window of the bus. They are then seen forcing their way onto the bus and assaulting occupants of the bus. According to a source at the Energy Ministry, the alleged National Security officers, after assaulting three persons on the bus, including the driver, dragged one staff member off the bus. According to the source, the whereabouts of the staff member who was taken away is currently unknown.

The1957News

59,958 views • 8 months ago

Yesterday, Greg Bovino accused me of lying for posting a video showing Border Patrol agents clashing with U.S. citizens outside a Minneapolis high school. And while I wasn’t lying, after reading Greg’s statement, reviewing the footage again, and comparing it with the school’s own account, I realized I owe everyone a correction, plus some much-needed context. I originally said “Border Patrol agents were filmed assaulting U.S. citizens outside a Minneapolis high school.” After considering Greg’s statement, I’d like to clarify… “Border Patrol agents were filmed assaulting SCHOOL OFFICIALS on the property of a Minneapolis high school.” Greg was quick to point out that agents apprehended their suspect NEAR a school… Which is helpful, actually. Because that means they were never originally on school property. Therefore, after the apprehension, agents didn’t leave the area. Instead, they continued to surround the school, and THEN entered the nearby high school’s property, during the school’s dismissal. This aligns perfectly with the school’s statement: “Armed U.S. Border Patrol officers came on school property during dismissal Wednesday.” School officials then attempted to get the agents to leave so students could exit safely. According to one school official: “The guy, I’m telling him like, ‘Please step off the school grounds,’ and this dude comes up and bumps into me and then tells me that I pushed him… and he knocked me down.” With all that new context, the video becomes extremely clear. • The men speaking to the agents are school officials asking Border Patrol to leave school grounds. • An agent shoves one staff member in the chest. • He pushes the agent’s hand away. • The agent runs at him and assaults him again. • The agent continues to escalate the situation, shoving ANOTHER staff member beside him. • Staff members attempt to de-escalate. • Another agent charges in, grabs the original staff member, and throws him to the ground. • More agents rush in. Chaos follows. Greg then claims, “We saw no students.” Which is… a fascinating assertion, considering this happened on school property during DISMISSAL, the video clearly shows students and staff watching, and then running away coughing after pepper spray was deployed by one of his agents, while a staff member yells for students to get back so they don’t get hurt. It’s also an interesting claim because Greg, himself, is clearly visible in the video, in direct line of sight of the students and staff, as he is talking to a school official. So, it turns out that Greg Bovino was the one lying, once again. And if sharing the actions of Border Patrol agents is what Greg calls “villainizing” them, then the solution is simple… stop committing violence. Correction issued.

Yesterday, Greg Bovino accused me of lying for posting a video showing Border Patrol agents clashing with U.S. citizens outside a Minneapolis high school. And while I wasn’t lying, after reading Greg’s statement, reviewing the footage again, and comparing it with the school’s own account, I realized I owe everyone a correction, plus some much-needed context. I originally said “Border Patrol agents were filmed assaulting U.S. citizens outside a Minneapolis high school.” After considering Greg’s statement, I’d like to clarify… “Border Patrol agents were filmed assaulting SCHOOL OFFICIALS on the property of a Minneapolis high school.” Greg was quick to point out that agents apprehended their suspect NEAR a school… Which is helpful, actually. Because that means they were never originally on school property. Therefore, after the apprehension, agents didn’t leave the area. Instead, they continued to surround the school, and THEN entered the nearby high school’s property, during the school’s dismissal. This aligns perfectly with the school’s statement: “Armed U.S. Border Patrol officers came on school property during dismissal Wednesday.” School officials then attempted to get the agents to leave so students could exit safely. According to one school official: “The guy, I’m telling him like, ‘Please step off the school grounds,’ and this dude comes up and bumps into me and then tells me that I pushed him… and he knocked me down.” With all that new context, the video becomes extremely clear. • The men speaking to the agents are school officials asking Border Patrol to leave school grounds. • An agent shoves one staff member in the chest. • He pushes the agent’s hand away. • The agent runs at him and assaults him again. • The agent continues to escalate the situation, shoving ANOTHER staff member beside him. • Staff members attempt to de-escalate. • Another agent charges in, grabs the original staff member, and throws him to the ground. • More agents rush in. Chaos follows. Greg then claims, “We saw no students.” Which is… a fascinating assertion, considering this happened on school property during DISMISSAL, the video clearly shows students and staff watching, and then running away coughing after pepper spray was deployed by one of his agents, while a staff member yells for students to get back so they don’t get hurt. It’s also an interesting claim because Greg, himself, is clearly visible in the video, in direct line of sight of the students and staff, as he is talking to a school official. So, it turns out that Greg Bovino was the one lying, once again. And if sharing the actions of Border Patrol agents is what Greg calls “villainizing” them, then the solution is simple… stop committing violence. Correction issued.

Jesus Freakin Congress

507,236 views • 8 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The bridges Trump warned about for next week reportedly got hit tonight Per Tasnim, US strikes reportedly hit a key bridge around Bandar Abbas tonight, days after Axios reported Trump warning that next week brings the power plants and the bridges. While the two guests were still talking, an F-35 reportedly declared an inflight emergency over UAE airspace, and the WSJ reported Trump is leaning toward expanded operations, with Kharg Island ground options on the list. Jonathan Conricus, former IDF spokesman, argued the case for force: CENTCOM has planned the strait mission for decades, the targets that actually matter remain unstruck, and the West keeps crediting the regime with strength it lacks: "If the straits need to be opened, then they need to be opened by force." Brandon Weichert answered with arithmetic. Two Marine expeditionary units plus the 82nd Airborne against a tunneled coastline of anti ship missiles reads like Gallipoli to him, the Navy already keeps its distance, and by his count interceptor stocks drained fast in sea fighting the public never saw. His bottom line: the strategic loss already happened, and the exit runs through negotiation. Jonathan granted Washington never explained this war to its own public, and Brandon granted the escalation is coming regardless. The bridges outside Bandar Abbas were settling the question in real time. Two of the sharpest people on opposite sides of the same question. Brandon Weichert, Jonathan Conricus

🇺🇸🇮🇷 The bridges Trump warned about for next week reportedly got hit tonight Per Tasnim, US strikes reportedly hit a key bridge around Bandar Abbas tonight, days after Axios reported Trump warning that next week brings the power plants and the bridges. While the two guests were still talking, an F-35 reportedly declared an inflight emergency over UAE airspace, and the WSJ reported Trump is leaning toward expanded operations, with Kharg Island ground options on the list. Jonathan Conricus, former IDF spokesman, argued the case for force: CENTCOM has planned the strait mission for decades, the targets that actually matter remain unstruck, and the West keeps crediting the regime with strength it lacks: "If the straits need to be opened, then they need to be opened by force." Brandon Weichert answered with arithmetic. Two Marine expeditionary units plus the 82nd Airborne against a tunneled coastline of anti ship missiles reads like Gallipoli to him, the Navy already keeps its distance, and by his count interceptor stocks drained fast in sea fighting the public never saw. His bottom line: the strategic loss already happened, and the exit runs through negotiation. Jonathan granted Washington never explained this war to its own public, and Brandon granted the escalation is coming regardless. The bridges outside Bandar Abbas were settling the question in real time. Two of the sharpest people on opposite sides of the same question. Brandon Weichert, Jonathan Conricus

Mario Nawfal

360,267 views • 2 months ago

🚨 I WARNED YOU ABOUT THIS AND I WAS RIGHT Insiders selling just hit an ATH. Of the 1000 insiders that I track, all are selling. 0 BUYS. This has never happened before. At the same time, while they tell you “the economy is strong,” they’re dumping everything. 2000, 2007, 2021. That’s one of the reasons I publicly sold 95% of my stocks weeks ago. And right on cue: Everything started moving lower. – BTC crashed – Gold crashed – S&P 500 crashed – Mortgage rates are above 7%. Affordability is at multi-decade lows. Delinquencies are rising. Yes, there was a bounce. That’s exit liquidity’s last breath. Someone who never listened to me got ruined again. This confirms the thesis. Insiders are prioritizing protection over returns. I’m still holding long-term BTC, real estate, and metals. Those don’t get touched. But being all-in… especially in stocks… at these valuations? S&P 500 Shiller CAPE is near 40. Levels only seen in the dot-com bubble peak. I’ve been in finance for more than 15 years. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll say it here publicly, like I always do. Many people will wish they had followed me sooner.

🚨 I WARNED YOU ABOUT THIS AND I WAS RIGHT Insiders selling just hit an ATH. Of the 1000 insiders that I track, all are selling. 0 BUYS. This has never happened before. At the same time, while they tell you “the economy is strong,” they’re dumping everything. 2000, 2007, 2021. That’s one of the reasons I publicly sold 95% of my stocks weeks ago. And right on cue: Everything started moving lower. – BTC crashed – Gold crashed – S&P 500 crashed – Mortgage rates are above 7%. Affordability is at multi-decade lows. Delinquencies are rising. Yes, there was a bounce. That’s exit liquidity’s last breath. Someone who never listened to me got ruined again. This confirms the thesis. Insiders are prioritizing protection over returns. I’m still holding long-term BTC, real estate, and metals. Those don’t get touched. But being all-in… especially in stocks… at these valuations? S&P 500 Shiller CAPE is near 40. Levels only seen in the dot-com bubble peak. I’ve been in finance for more than 15 years. When I EXIT the markets completely, I’ll say it here publicly, like I always do. Many people will wish they had followed me sooner.

Alex Mason 👁△

60,326 views • 6 months ago