Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Stuffing her drunk sleeping asshole, with her legs wide open ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ‘ Comment: What i must do with her next? Please, REPOST to help us keep posting some free content!โค๏ธ Dm on Telegram, to join the Free Group 100% ORIGINAL & REAL SOMNO CONTENT Cumshots, anal cum filling, eyechecks, ass-to-pussy,...

CreamDreamOFC's profile picture

CreamDream - Real Somno Content

5,515 subscribers

97,203 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 2 Jahren โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

NSFW
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfรผgbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

ร„hnliche Videos

What would you do if this mirror pulled you underwater? Nano Banana 2 + Seedance 2.5 on TapNow prompt SCENE CONTEXT A girl Image flees something unseen through a glowing forest, trips, falls โ€” and finds an antique mirror that yanks her through into an underwater city. There, mid-float before the great shell palace, she turns her head โ€” a flash of POV shows a colossal mouth opening onto her โ€” and back in the wide frame the whale is already closing its jaw and gliding calmly away. 24 seconds, full realism. ACTIVE REFERENCES โ€” STRICT ROLE HIERARCHY Image HER EXACT FACE โ€” sole source of her identity and features, 100% match, zero drift: a 20-year-old , 163 cm, slim and lightly built. Soft rounded oval face; warm light-beige skin with a golden undertone and real photographic texture โ€” visible pores, small freckles and tiny beauty marks across the cheeks and nose bridge; dark blue almond eyes with a shallow partially hidden upper-lid crease and soft under-eye fullness; thick dark straight brows with individual hairs brushed upward; a small neat nose with narrow straight bridge and softly rounded tip; full lips with a defined cupid's bow, the lower lip fuller, natural rosy tone; softly rounded jaw tapering to a small chin; small silver hoop earrings. Ignore this reference's hair, clothing, car interior and lighting. Face identity comes from this reference in every single frame. Image : CHARACTER SHEET โ€” controls everything: long voluminous wavy blonde hair past the shoulders; neat elven ears with slender pointed tips; a white billowy medieval linen shirt deep plunging scoop neckline that reveals significant cleavage., with puffed sleeves; a brown leather underbust corset; fitted sage-green trousers; tall brown leather boots; brown leather gloves; a forest-green wool hooded cloak clasped at the collar. Does NOT control the face. Image FOREST LOCATION โ€” a misty magical forest: narrow dirt path, giant glowing red mushrooms casting warm orange light, pink flowers, mossy trunks, drifting fog. 100% matches the reference. Image : UNDERWATER CITY LOCATION โ€” the plaza: a colossal ribbed nautilus-shell palace with glowing golden seams, pearl shell houses with warm windows, god rays from above, jellyfish and drifting sea life. 100% matches the reference. FORMAT MODE One continuous shot from 0:00 to 0:19, then TWO HARD CUTS in the finale: a fast POV insert and a return to the previous framing. No fades, no dissolves. Full realism. HER BACKWARD GLANCE โ€” HOW IT MUST LOOK, STRICT Whenever she checks behind her, she does NOT turn toward the camera and does NOT look into the lens. She rotates her head roughly 45ยฐ to ONE SIDE and her EYES GO THE SAME WAY her head goes โ€” looking off toward that side of frame, into the fog, then snapping forward again. BANS: no over-the-shoulder look at the lens, no eye contact with the camera, no 180ยฐ head turn. SHOT 1 โ€” 0:00โ€“0:01.5 โ€” HER FEET, LOW AND CANTED LOW, near ground level, canted hard โ€” Dutch tilt ~20โ€“25ยฐ โ€” framing her BOOTS and lower legs sprinting along the path: soil bursting, cloak hem cracking, mushroom stalks brushing aside, path streaking in motion blur. Handheld, jolting with her rhythm; the pursuer heard far behind in the fog. SHOT 2 โ€” 0:01.5โ€“0:03 โ€” HER FACE, FRIGHTENED Unbroken move: the frame rises and pushes in to her FACE โ€” a tight running close-up travelling with her, still canted, hair whipping. Raw fear: wide eyes, brows drawn, mouth gasping, dirt on her cheek. Twice she performs the 45ยฐ glance as specified, eyes going the same way as her head, searching the fog off to that side; then forward again. SHOT 3 โ€” 0:03โ€“0:05 โ€” THE TRIP, WIDE Unbroken: the frame swings out to a WIDE shot of the path โ€” full figure, mushrooms towering, fog closing the depth. Mid-glance her leading boot CATCHES a root โ€” the foot stops dead, momentum throws her forward, and she goes down hard in full view: knees, then hands and shoulder into the dirt, dust and leaf litter bursting up, cloak flying over her. She lands sprawled, chest heaving. SHOT 4 โ€” 0:05โ€“0:09 โ€” THE MIRROR SHE ALMOST IGNORES Unbroken: the camera drifts in from the front, then around to her side, settling into profile with her and the mirror in frame. Fear first, curiosity second: sprawled, she checks behind with the 45ยฐ head-and-eyes turn; the crashing is closer. She scrambles up, barely looking ahead โ€” then registers an ornate antique MIRROR against a mossy trunk, filled with cold blue glow unlike the warm mushroom light. Brushing dirt off her sleeve with ONE hand, her eyes stay on the glass. THE MIRROR DOES NOT REFLECT: her reflection NEVER appears, no mirror image of her, no reflection of the forest โ€” the glass is a window filled with its own inner light: fog thinning into deep watery blue, faint caustics, vague luminous silhouettes far in the depth, no sharp image. The blue washes her face. ACTING TASK โ€” HER CHOICE (the work happens in her eyes): glass โ†’ a 45ยฐ glance into the fog behind โ†’ glass again; she registers that nothing of HER answers her movement in it; no time to solve it. She extends ONE FINGER toward the surface. (Safety: gaze always engaged; natural blink cadence.) SHOT 5 โ€” 0:09โ€“0:11 โ€” THE YANK: UNDER A SECOND Her fingertip nears the glass. The light FLARES โ€” the surface SNAPS outward like a whip and SEIZES her hand. INSTANT: she is RIPPED off her feet, jerked forward along her outstretched arm, body whipping horizontal in a single frame, head-first through the glass, boots torn off the ground last, cloak cracking behind her. No build-up, no float โ€” limp as a ragdoll, the mirror doing ALL of it, vector purely FORWARD through the glass plane. Camera: caught off guard WITH her โ€” it WHIPS sideways-and-forward, slings around behind her flying body and punches through the rippling surface on her heels; water and bubbles SLAM across the lens, forest colors ripped into deep blue. NOT her POV. SHOT 6 โ€” 0:11โ€“0:16 โ€” ARRIVAL IN THE PLAZA Same shot, no cut โ€” camera behind her. THE FIRST UNDERWATER FRAME IS THE ARRIVAL FRAME: the portal exits DIRECTLY INTO the plaza of >>; the colossal nautilus palace is ALREADY in frame, its ribbed pearl wall with glowing golden seams filling the background, sharp and close; shell houses with warm windows border both sides. NO TRAVEL, no approach โ€” the water BRAKES her within a meter or two. HER BODY: horizontal, HEAD-FIRST, back toward the surface, fully passive โ€” arms loose, LEGS STILL AND MOTIONLESS, no kicking, no strokes; thrown cargo, not a swimmer. UNDERWATER PHYSICS, HIGHEST PRIORITY: hair streaming backward in rippling seaweed-like strands, cloak dragging in a heavy water-loaded wave; on stopping, hair and cloak drift forward past her shoulders by inertia. She pivots from horizontal to upright โ€” feet swinging down, legs hanging relaxed โ€” settling into weightless float facing the palace wall. HER HAIR AT REST, STRICT: no parting, no combed order โ€” a loose free-floating mass fanning outward and upward from her whole head, strands crossing over her crown in constant slow chaotic motion, never symmetrical, never still. The cloak billows wide, breathing with the water. SHE CANNOT BREATHE UNDERWATER: cheeks slightly puffed, lips pressed, holding her breath. Bubbles rise from her mouth in small silver clusters climbing upward past her face. ACTING TASK: to ORIENT beneath something impossibly huge โ€” her attention pulls UPWARD: head climbing the glowing houses, up the palace wall, chin lifting, trying to find where the spiral ends. Jellyfish pulse between the houses. SHOT 7 โ€” 0:16โ€“0:19 โ€” SETTLE INTO THE MEDIUM PROFILE FRAME Same shot, no cut. The camera drifts smoothly from behind her around to her side and settles into the framing that holds for the rest of the film: FRAMING LOCK โ€” MEDIUM PROFILE: she is seen from her LEFT SIDE in a medium shot, CHEST-UP ONLY โ€” never full-body, never small in frame; her head and shoulders occupy the lower-left third, elven ear tip clear, hair a floating dark halo, white puffed sleeve and green cloak reading in the frame's bottom, one gloved hand extended forward. Behind and above her, filling the whole background, the giant glowing spiral nautilus palace; pearl shell houses along the lower edge; god rays raking down from the surface; a jellyfish drifting at frame-left; her bubbles rising past her face. She hangs weightless with the faintest sway. SHOT 8 โ€” 0:19โ€“0:21 โ€” SHE TURNS HER HEAD (SAME FRAME) No cut, camera locked in the FRAMING LOCK. She turns her head sharply to look off toward frame-LEFT โ€” a fast, alarmed head turn, eyes going the same direction, brows snapping up, a startled burst of bubbles ripping from her mouth. Her shoulder tenses; nothing else of her moves. She is still only chest-up in frame; the whale is NOT visible yet. HARD CUT. SHOT 9 โ€” 0:21โ€“0:22.5 โ€” POV: THE MOUTH OPENS ON US FIRST-PERSON POV FROM HER EYES โ€” fast and brutal: filling the entire frame, the colossal whale's head rushes in from the left, and the vast baleen MOUTH OPENS WIDE โ€” grooved pale throat pleats stretching, a dark glowing cavern spreading until it swallows the frame edge to edge; water and bubbles ripping past the lens; the scale absolute, the opening several times larger than a human body. Quick โ€” a second and a half, no lingering. The frame goes to the mouth's darkness. HARD CUT. SHOT 10 โ€” 0:22.5โ€“0:24 โ€” BACK TO THE SAME FRAME: THE WHALE MOVES ON Return to the EXACT FRAMING LOCK of Shot 7โ€“8 โ€” same camera position, same background: the glowing spiral palace, the shell houses, the god rays. The girl is no longer there; only her last scattered bubbles rising where she floated. The colossal whale is already in frame with its JAW CLOSED, gliding calmly from LEFT to RIGHT across the plaza โ€” placid, unhurried, indifferent, as if it simply fed on the way past. Its enormous flank sweeps close past the lens: dark iridescent mother-of-pearl skin shifting purple-green-blue like oil on water, scattered glowing teal rings and dotted bioluminescent lines, a tall webbed translucent dorsal fin with visible veining, pectoral and tail fins extending into long flowing translucent ribbon-streamers rippling like silk. TRUE WHALE LOCOMOTION: all thrust from the TAIL โ€” deep lateral sweeps bending the rear third of the body, an S-wave of muscle rolling down the flanks head-to-tail on every beat, mass shifting under the skin, head steady on course, ribbon-fins streaming back like wings. Living muscle, never a rigid sculpture on rails. Its wake rocks the jellyfish and scatters her bubbles. It exits frame-RIGHT. Final beat: the empty plaza, the palace glowing, bubbles dispersing, water settling. END. Exactly ONE creature in the finale, the same individual in the POV and in the return frame โ€” no second creature, no duplicate. No grabbing, no chewing, no thrashing, no blood, no gore โ€” the horror is entirely scale. PHYSICS Forest: real running biomechanics, the head-turns costing her balance, the trip stopping the foot dead while momentum carries her over, a genuine three-point fall, real bodyweight in the scramble up. The yank: whip-crack acceleration, body limp, purely forward. Underwater: everything obeys water โ€” drag on limbs and fabric, slow rebound, no dry-hair or dry-cloth behavior in any frame; the whale moves with true mass and inertia, its bow wave visibly displacing water, bubbles and jellyfish; the jaw opens and closes with weight, not like a trap. LIGHTING Forest: warm orange mushroom glow against cool misty air; the mirror's cold blue the only competing source. Underwater: cool blue depth light with god rays, warm golden light from the shell houses and the palace's glowing seams; caustic ripples crawling over her skin, the white sleeve and the whale's flank; the open mouth in the POV reading as a deep shadowed cavern with faint light only on the throat pleats. Natural exposure, no stylization. MATERIALS Real skin with pores and freckles; individual hair strands, dry and flying in the forest, water-loaded and undulating below; real linen weave, leather grain, heavy wool cloak with true water weight; real soil, moss and mushroom flesh; pearl shell with subsurface glow; the whale's iridescent hide with subsurface shift, skin folds and grooved throat pleats, translucent fin membranes. No plastic skin, no CG sheen. AUDIO โ€” SFX ONLY, NO MUSIC 0:00โ€“0:05: pounding footsteps, ragged breathing, cloak snapping, DISTANT crashing branches and a low guttural monster call rolling through the fog; the trip โ€” scuff, body impact, gasp. 0:05โ€“0:09: panicked breathing, scrambling in dirt, forest ambience, a rising crystalline hum near the glass. 0:09โ€“0:11: a sharp liquid CRACK, one violent water-rush WHOOSH, bubbles slamming the lens; forest sound cutting off dead. 0:11โ€“0:19: muffled underwater ambience, soft bubble streams, distant whale-like calls, faint clicks, a deep resonant hum from the palace. 0:19โ€“0:22.5: a startled bubble burst; a deep swelling RUMBLE from the left; in the POV a roaring water-rush and the wet groan of the opening jaw. 0:22.5โ€“0:24: one soft heavy WHOMP settling, then calm rhythmic tail SWISH, the flank's water-rush passing the lens, fading right into churning wake and settling ambience. No score, no melody anywhere. POSITIVE CONSTRAINTS Continuous shot 0:00โ€“0:19; then exactly TWO HARD CUTS: into the POV insert and back out to the identical framing. No other cuts anywhere. FRAMING LOCK: from 0:16 to the end (except the POV insert) the camera holds the same medium profile framing โ€” she is CHEST-UP, seen from her left side, lower-left of frame, with the glowing spiral palace filling the background. She is never shown full-body in this section, never small in frame, and the camera never moves. The finale order is exact: she turns her head left (chest-up, whale not visible) โ†’ HARD CUT to her POV of the mouth opening wide, fast โ†’ HARD CUT back to the same framing where the jaw is already closed and the whale glides calmly left to right and exits. Her glances in the forest: ~45ยฐ head turns with eyes going the same direction; never toward the lens. The forest pursuer is NEVER shown โ€” distant sound only. The mirror NEVER reflects her or the forest โ€” a lit window, not a reflective surface. Underwater she never swims โ€” legs still and motionless throughout; the palace fills the background from the first underwater frame, no travel. Her hair underwater is a chaotic free-floating mass โ€” never parted, never neat, never still. Face 100% >> every frame, zero drift; hair, elven ears, wardrobe 100% >>; forest 100% >>; plaza and palace 100% >>. No grabbing, chewing, blood or gore; exactly ONE creature; she is not visible after the POV cut, only her bubbles. Full realism โ€” no animated look, no illustration, no CG gloss, no plastic surfaces. Clean image: no grain, no vignette. She is the only person. No text, no logos, no watermarks. OPTICS STRONG anamorphic lens character: horizontal squeeze and compression, oval elliptical bokeh, horizontally stretched highlights, curved barrel edge distortion, chromatic aberration toward the edges. NO lens flares, NO light streaks, NO floating bokeh circles. Shot 1: canted 20โ€“25ยฐ, low on boots. Shot 2: focus locked on her face. Shot 3: wide, deep focus. Shots 4โ€“5: her face and the mirror's glow. Shots 6โ€“8: her in medium profile against the palace, caustics softening the depth. Shot 9 (POV): ultra-wide immersive perspective, the mouth filling the frame. Shot 10: the flank sharp as it sweeps past the lens.
0:27

What would you do if this mirror pulled you underwater? Nano Banana 2 + Seedance 2.5 on TapNow prompt SCENE CONTEXT A girl Image flees something unseen through a glowing forest, trips, falls โ€” and finds an antique mirror that yanks her through into an underwater city. There, mid-float before the great shell palace, she turns her head โ€” a flash of POV shows a colossal mouth opening onto her โ€” and back in the wide frame the whale is already closing its jaw and gliding calmly away. 24 seconds, full realism. ACTIVE REFERENCES โ€” STRICT ROLE HIERARCHY Image HER EXACT FACE โ€” sole source of her identity and features, 100% match, zero drift: a 20-year-old , 163 cm, slim and lightly built. Soft rounded oval face; warm light-beige skin with a golden undertone and real photographic texture โ€” visible pores, small freckles and tiny beauty marks across the cheeks and nose bridge; dark blue almond eyes with a shallow partially hidden upper-lid crease and soft under-eye fullness; thick dark straight brows with individual hairs brushed upward; a small neat nose with narrow straight bridge and softly rounded tip; full lips with a defined cupid's bow, the lower lip fuller, natural rosy tone; softly rounded jaw tapering to a small chin; small silver hoop earrings. Ignore this reference's hair, clothing, car interior and lighting. Face identity comes from this reference in every single frame. Image : CHARACTER SHEET โ€” controls everything: long voluminous wavy blonde hair past the shoulders; neat elven ears with slender pointed tips; a white billowy medieval linen shirt deep plunging scoop neckline that reveals significant cleavage., with puffed sleeves; a brown leather underbust corset; fitted sage-green trousers; tall brown leather boots; brown leather gloves; a forest-green wool hooded cloak clasped at the collar. Does NOT control the face. Image FOREST LOCATION โ€” a misty magical forest: narrow dirt path, giant glowing red mushrooms casting warm orange light, pink flowers, mossy trunks, drifting fog. 100% matches the reference. Image : UNDERWATER CITY LOCATION โ€” the plaza: a colossal ribbed nautilus-shell palace with glowing golden seams, pearl shell houses with warm windows, god rays from above, jellyfish and drifting sea life. 100% matches the reference. FORMAT MODE One continuous shot from 0:00 to 0:19, then TWO HARD CUTS in the finale: a fast POV insert and a return to the previous framing. No fades, no dissolves. Full realism. HER BACKWARD GLANCE โ€” HOW IT MUST LOOK, STRICT Whenever she checks behind her, she does NOT turn toward the camera and does NOT look into the lens. She rotates her head roughly 45ยฐ to ONE SIDE and her EYES GO THE SAME WAY her head goes โ€” looking off toward that side of frame, into the fog, then snapping forward again. BANS: no over-the-shoulder look at the lens, no eye contact with the camera, no 180ยฐ head turn. SHOT 1 โ€” 0:00โ€“0:01.5 โ€” HER FEET, LOW AND CANTED LOW, near ground level, canted hard โ€” Dutch tilt ~20โ€“25ยฐ โ€” framing her BOOTS and lower legs sprinting along the path: soil bursting, cloak hem cracking, mushroom stalks brushing aside, path streaking in motion blur. Handheld, jolting with her rhythm; the pursuer heard far behind in the fog. SHOT 2 โ€” 0:01.5โ€“0:03 โ€” HER FACE, FRIGHTENED Unbroken move: the frame rises and pushes in to her FACE โ€” a tight running close-up travelling with her, still canted, hair whipping. Raw fear: wide eyes, brows drawn, mouth gasping, dirt on her cheek. Twice she performs the 45ยฐ glance as specified, eyes going the same way as her head, searching the fog off to that side; then forward again. SHOT 3 โ€” 0:03โ€“0:05 โ€” THE TRIP, WIDE Unbroken: the frame swings out to a WIDE shot of the path โ€” full figure, mushrooms towering, fog closing the depth. Mid-glance her leading boot CATCHES a root โ€” the foot stops dead, momentum throws her forward, and she goes down hard in full view: knees, then hands and shoulder into the dirt, dust and leaf litter bursting up, cloak flying over her. She lands sprawled, chest heaving. SHOT 4 โ€” 0:05โ€“0:09 โ€” THE MIRROR SHE ALMOST IGNORES Unbroken: the camera drifts in from the front, then around to her side, settling into profile with her and the mirror in frame. Fear first, curiosity second: sprawled, she checks behind with the 45ยฐ head-and-eyes turn; the crashing is closer. She scrambles up, barely looking ahead โ€” then registers an ornate antique MIRROR against a mossy trunk, filled with cold blue glow unlike the warm mushroom light. Brushing dirt off her sleeve with ONE hand, her eyes stay on the glass. THE MIRROR DOES NOT REFLECT: her reflection NEVER appears, no mirror image of her, no reflection of the forest โ€” the glass is a window filled with its own inner light: fog thinning into deep watery blue, faint caustics, vague luminous silhouettes far in the depth, no sharp image. The blue washes her face. ACTING TASK โ€” HER CHOICE (the work happens in her eyes): glass โ†’ a 45ยฐ glance into the fog behind โ†’ glass again; she registers that nothing of HER answers her movement in it; no time to solve it. She extends ONE FINGER toward the surface. (Safety: gaze always engaged; natural blink cadence.) SHOT 5 โ€” 0:09โ€“0:11 โ€” THE YANK: UNDER A SECOND Her fingertip nears the glass. The light FLARES โ€” the surface SNAPS outward like a whip and SEIZES her hand. INSTANT: she is RIPPED off her feet, jerked forward along her outstretched arm, body whipping horizontal in a single frame, head-first through the glass, boots torn off the ground last, cloak cracking behind her. No build-up, no float โ€” limp as a ragdoll, the mirror doing ALL of it, vector purely FORWARD through the glass plane. Camera: caught off guard WITH her โ€” it WHIPS sideways-and-forward, slings around behind her flying body and punches through the rippling surface on her heels; water and bubbles SLAM across the lens, forest colors ripped into deep blue. NOT her POV. SHOT 6 โ€” 0:11โ€“0:16 โ€” ARRIVAL IN THE PLAZA Same shot, no cut โ€” camera behind her. THE FIRST UNDERWATER FRAME IS THE ARRIVAL FRAME: the portal exits DIRECTLY INTO the plaza of >>; the colossal nautilus palace is ALREADY in frame, its ribbed pearl wall with glowing golden seams filling the background, sharp and close; shell houses with warm windows border both sides. NO TRAVEL, no approach โ€” the water BRAKES her within a meter or two. HER BODY: horizontal, HEAD-FIRST, back toward the surface, fully passive โ€” arms loose, LEGS STILL AND MOTIONLESS, no kicking, no strokes; thrown cargo, not a swimmer. UNDERWATER PHYSICS, HIGHEST PRIORITY: hair streaming backward in rippling seaweed-like strands, cloak dragging in a heavy water-loaded wave; on stopping, hair and cloak drift forward past her shoulders by inertia. She pivots from horizontal to upright โ€” feet swinging down, legs hanging relaxed โ€” settling into weightless float facing the palace wall. HER HAIR AT REST, STRICT: no parting, no combed order โ€” a loose free-floating mass fanning outward and upward from her whole head, strands crossing over her crown in constant slow chaotic motion, never symmetrical, never still. The cloak billows wide, breathing with the water. SHE CANNOT BREATHE UNDERWATER: cheeks slightly puffed, lips pressed, holding her breath. Bubbles rise from her mouth in small silver clusters climbing upward past her face. ACTING TASK: to ORIENT beneath something impossibly huge โ€” her attention pulls UPWARD: head climbing the glowing houses, up the palace wall, chin lifting, trying to find where the spiral ends. Jellyfish pulse between the houses. SHOT 7 โ€” 0:16โ€“0:19 โ€” SETTLE INTO THE MEDIUM PROFILE FRAME Same shot, no cut. The camera drifts smoothly from behind her around to her side and settles into the framing that holds for the rest of the film: FRAMING LOCK โ€” MEDIUM PROFILE: she is seen from her LEFT SIDE in a medium shot, CHEST-UP ONLY โ€” never full-body, never small in frame; her head and shoulders occupy the lower-left third, elven ear tip clear, hair a floating dark halo, white puffed sleeve and green cloak reading in the frame's bottom, one gloved hand extended forward. Behind and above her, filling the whole background, the giant glowing spiral nautilus palace; pearl shell houses along the lower edge; god rays raking down from the surface; a jellyfish drifting at frame-left; her bubbles rising past her face. She hangs weightless with the faintest sway. SHOT 8 โ€” 0:19โ€“0:21 โ€” SHE TURNS HER HEAD (SAME FRAME) No cut, camera locked in the FRAMING LOCK. She turns her head sharply to look off toward frame-LEFT โ€” a fast, alarmed head turn, eyes going the same direction, brows snapping up, a startled burst of bubbles ripping from her mouth. Her shoulder tenses; nothing else of her moves. She is still only chest-up in frame; the whale is NOT visible yet. HARD CUT. SHOT 9 โ€” 0:21โ€“0:22.5 โ€” POV: THE MOUTH OPENS ON US FIRST-PERSON POV FROM HER EYES โ€” fast and brutal: filling the entire frame, the colossal whale's head rushes in from the left, and the vast baleen MOUTH OPENS WIDE โ€” grooved pale throat pleats stretching, a dark glowing cavern spreading until it swallows the frame edge to edge; water and bubbles ripping past the lens; the scale absolute, the opening several times larger than a human body. Quick โ€” a second and a half, no lingering. The frame goes to the mouth's darkness. HARD CUT. SHOT 10 โ€” 0:22.5โ€“0:24 โ€” BACK TO THE SAME FRAME: THE WHALE MOVES ON Return to the EXACT FRAMING LOCK of Shot 7โ€“8 โ€” same camera position, same background: the glowing spiral palace, the shell houses, the god rays. The girl is no longer there; only her last scattered bubbles rising where she floated. The colossal whale is already in frame with its JAW CLOSED, gliding calmly from LEFT to RIGHT across the plaza โ€” placid, unhurried, indifferent, as if it simply fed on the way past. Its enormous flank sweeps close past the lens: dark iridescent mother-of-pearl skin shifting purple-green-blue like oil on water, scattered glowing teal rings and dotted bioluminescent lines, a tall webbed translucent dorsal fin with visible veining, pectoral and tail fins extending into long flowing translucent ribbon-streamers rippling like silk. TRUE WHALE LOCOMOTION: all thrust from the TAIL โ€” deep lateral sweeps bending the rear third of the body, an S-wave of muscle rolling down the flanks head-to-tail on every beat, mass shifting under the skin, head steady on course, ribbon-fins streaming back like wings. Living muscle, never a rigid sculpture on rails. Its wake rocks the jellyfish and scatters her bubbles. It exits frame-RIGHT. Final beat: the empty plaza, the palace glowing, bubbles dispersing, water settling. END. Exactly ONE creature in the finale, the same individual in the POV and in the return frame โ€” no second creature, no duplicate. No grabbing, no chewing, no thrashing, no blood, no gore โ€” the horror is entirely scale. PHYSICS Forest: real running biomechanics, the head-turns costing her balance, the trip stopping the foot dead while momentum carries her over, a genuine three-point fall, real bodyweight in the scramble up. The yank: whip-crack acceleration, body limp, purely forward. Underwater: everything obeys water โ€” drag on limbs and fabric, slow rebound, no dry-hair or dry-cloth behavior in any frame; the whale moves with true mass and inertia, its bow wave visibly displacing water, bubbles and jellyfish; the jaw opens and closes with weight, not like a trap. LIGHTING Forest: warm orange mushroom glow against cool misty air; the mirror's cold blue the only competing source. Underwater: cool blue depth light with god rays, warm golden light from the shell houses and the palace's glowing seams; caustic ripples crawling over her skin, the white sleeve and the whale's flank; the open mouth in the POV reading as a deep shadowed cavern with faint light only on the throat pleats. Natural exposure, no stylization. MATERIALS Real skin with pores and freckles; individual hair strands, dry and flying in the forest, water-loaded and undulating below; real linen weave, leather grain, heavy wool cloak with true water weight; real soil, moss and mushroom flesh; pearl shell with subsurface glow; the whale's iridescent hide with subsurface shift, skin folds and grooved throat pleats, translucent fin membranes. No plastic skin, no CG sheen. AUDIO โ€” SFX ONLY, NO MUSIC 0:00โ€“0:05: pounding footsteps, ragged breathing, cloak snapping, DISTANT crashing branches and a low guttural monster call rolling through the fog; the trip โ€” scuff, body impact, gasp. 0:05โ€“0:09: panicked breathing, scrambling in dirt, forest ambience, a rising crystalline hum near the glass. 0:09โ€“0:11: a sharp liquid CRACK, one violent water-rush WHOOSH, bubbles slamming the lens; forest sound cutting off dead. 0:11โ€“0:19: muffled underwater ambience, soft bubble streams, distant whale-like calls, faint clicks, a deep resonant hum from the palace. 0:19โ€“0:22.5: a startled bubble burst; a deep swelling RUMBLE from the left; in the POV a roaring water-rush and the wet groan of the opening jaw. 0:22.5โ€“0:24: one soft heavy WHOMP settling, then calm rhythmic tail SWISH, the flank's water-rush passing the lens, fading right into churning wake and settling ambience. No score, no melody anywhere. POSITIVE CONSTRAINTS Continuous shot 0:00โ€“0:19; then exactly TWO HARD CUTS: into the POV insert and back out to the identical framing. No other cuts anywhere. FRAMING LOCK: from 0:16 to the end (except the POV insert) the camera holds the same medium profile framing โ€” she is CHEST-UP, seen from her left side, lower-left of frame, with the glowing spiral palace filling the background. She is never shown full-body in this section, never small in frame, and the camera never moves. The finale order is exact: she turns her head left (chest-up, whale not visible) โ†’ HARD CUT to her POV of the mouth opening wide, fast โ†’ HARD CUT back to the same framing where the jaw is already closed and the whale glides calmly left to right and exits. Her glances in the forest: ~45ยฐ head turns with eyes going the same direction; never toward the lens. The forest pursuer is NEVER shown โ€” distant sound only. The mirror NEVER reflects her or the forest โ€” a lit window, not a reflective surface. Underwater she never swims โ€” legs still and motionless throughout; the palace fills the background from the first underwater frame, no travel. Her hair underwater is a chaotic free-floating mass โ€” never parted, never neat, never still. Face 100% >> every frame, zero drift; hair, elven ears, wardrobe 100% >>; forest 100% >>; plaza and palace 100% >>. No grabbing, chewing, blood or gore; exactly ONE creature; she is not visible after the POV cut, only her bubbles. Full realism โ€” no animated look, no illustration, no CG gloss, no plastic surfaces. Clean image: no grain, no vignette. She is the only person. No text, no logos, no watermarks. OPTICS STRONG anamorphic lens character: horizontal squeeze and compression, oval elliptical bokeh, horizontally stretched highlights, curved barrel edge distortion, chromatic aberration toward the edges. NO lens flares, NO light streaks, NO floating bokeh circles. Shot 1: canted 20โ€“25ยฐ, low on boots. Shot 2: focus locked on her face. Shot 3: wide, deep focus. Shots 4โ€“5: her face and the mirror's glow. Shots 6โ€“8: her in medium profile against the palace, caustics softening the depth. Shot 9 (POV): ultra-wide immersive perspective, the mouth filling the frame. Shot 10: the flank sharp as it sweeps past the lens.

Sharon Riley

28,464 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 13 Tagen

VIDEO: Watch Charlie Kirk's last words to me Just a few months before he was murdered, Charlie Kirk and I were talking about the state of things in Canada. He was worried about Mark Carneyโ€™s election and what might happen to freedom โ€” and to Rebel News. We spoke for more than half an hour. He really cared about our country. He knew a lot about Rebel News, especially our battles for free speech. And he was worried whenever one of our journalists were arrested. Watch the video above to see what he said to me. We talked about what life was like in a country without the First Amendment to protect our free speech. And then he asked me: โ€œAre you guys going to give up?โ€ I told him weโ€™ll never give up. Itโ€™s our duty fight for freedom. Like we have for ten full years at Rebel News, thanks to viewers like you. You are the reason I was able to tell him weโ€™d always fight. Because we rely on you, instead of relying on grants from Mark Carney. Weโ€™re independent. We take no government money. So we can fight back. We do great journalism, from the trucker convoy in 2022 to the ostrich farm siege in 2025. We have reporters across the country, including in Quebec. But every once in a while we donโ€™t just write about a problem. We stop and get involved in the battle, too, to try to fix it. Like fighting for thousands of people who received huge Covid fines. Defending Christian pastors. Crowdfunding the battle for Tamara Lich. Paying for the lawyer for the Ontario man who defended his house from a home invasion robbery. Standing up for the little guy. Itโ€™s that activist side that Charlie loved about us. All of the things Charlie worried about for America are getting worse in Canada in 2026. Thatโ€™s why Charlie asked me if Iโ€™d stay in the battle. He was counting on Rebel News to fight โ€” to cover the news, especially the news that other media wonโ€™t cover. He wanted us to continue to take on corruption, and mass immigration, and censorship and to go out among the people and tell their stories, and help fight their battles. Heโ€™d be thrilled to know that we have hired Tamara Lich as our newest Rebel. And heโ€™d be excited that weโ€™re going to put her on a campus tour, like Charlie himself would do. I think thatโ€™s what heโ€™d want Rebel News to do. What do you think heโ€™d want YOU to do? Mainly, I think heโ€™d want you to not give up, to not be demoralized. To find the energy and hope and faith to keep fighting. And Iโ€™d like to think that heโ€™d want you to continue to support us. I wonโ€™t presume to speak for him, but he knew we had no big backers โ€” just a lot of little backers, through crowdfunding. He liked that about us. When Charlie told me to keep fighting, I never thought it would be his last request of me. We mention Charlie a fair bit at the Rebel News office; in the new year, Tamara Lich will go from college to college convincing young people to believe in freedom, just like Charlie did. Weโ€™re going to have to hire a lot of security for Tamara. In my mind thatโ€™s the best way for us to live up to Charlieโ€™s expectations of us, donโ€™t you think? May I invite you to join us, to help me keep my final promise to Charlie? I need your help to protect Tamara, and all of our Rebel journalists who bravely go into the world. We need to pay for security guards, because police just wonโ€™t stop Antifa thugs, or transgender extremists. If you contribute $100 or more, weโ€™ll invite you on a special donors-only Zoom call early in the new year, where you can chat with me, Tamara, and our other reporters directly. And any donations of $1,000 or more will also get a one-on-one thank-you phone call from Tamara herself! I want to keep my promise to Charlie, and to you, and to my conscience: I told him I wouldnโ€™t give up, even if things get tough. And I intend to keep that promise. If you can help me โ€” by helping me keep our reporters safe โ€” please do so further down below on this page. Thanks. Charlie Kirk was killed because he was effective at spreading the message of freedom to young people. I believe we can honour his memory by recreating his campus tour here in Canada, featuring Tamara Lich, our newest Rebel reporter. I just need your help with security โ€” we must do what we can to protect her. Please help. Rebel News does ten news stories a day โ€” we tell the other side, as our motto says. But what Charlie loved most about us was when we did things in the world, like Tamaraโ€™s upcoming campus tour. Can you please help me make that tour a reality by helping us crowdfund the security for it? Any donation of $100 or more will get you on a private Zoom call with other donors to talk to Tamara and our other reporters! And any donation of $1,000 will also get you a personal one-on-one phone call from her. REPORT by Ezra Levant ๐Ÿ๐Ÿš›:
8:23

VIDEO: Watch Charlie Kirk's last words to me Just a few months before he was murdered, Charlie Kirk and I were talking about the state of things in Canada. He was worried about Mark Carneyโ€™s election and what might happen to freedom โ€” and to Rebel News. We spoke for more than half an hour. He really cared about our country. He knew a lot about Rebel News, especially our battles for free speech. And he was worried whenever one of our journalists were arrested. Watch the video above to see what he said to me. We talked about what life was like in a country without the First Amendment to protect our free speech. And then he asked me: โ€œAre you guys going to give up?โ€ I told him weโ€™ll never give up. Itโ€™s our duty fight for freedom. Like we have for ten full years at Rebel News, thanks to viewers like you. You are the reason I was able to tell him weโ€™d always fight. Because we rely on you, instead of relying on grants from Mark Carney. Weโ€™re independent. We take no government money. So we can fight back. We do great journalism, from the trucker convoy in 2022 to the ostrich farm siege in 2025. We have reporters across the country, including in Quebec. But every once in a while we donโ€™t just write about a problem. We stop and get involved in the battle, too, to try to fix it. Like fighting for thousands of people who received huge Covid fines. Defending Christian pastors. Crowdfunding the battle for Tamara Lich. Paying for the lawyer for the Ontario man who defended his house from a home invasion robbery. Standing up for the little guy. Itโ€™s that activist side that Charlie loved about us. All of the things Charlie worried about for America are getting worse in Canada in 2026. Thatโ€™s why Charlie asked me if Iโ€™d stay in the battle. He was counting on Rebel News to fight โ€” to cover the news, especially the news that other media wonโ€™t cover. He wanted us to continue to take on corruption, and mass immigration, and censorship and to go out among the people and tell their stories, and help fight their battles. Heโ€™d be thrilled to know that we have hired Tamara Lich as our newest Rebel. And heโ€™d be excited that weโ€™re going to put her on a campus tour, like Charlie himself would do. I think thatโ€™s what heโ€™d want Rebel News to do. What do you think heโ€™d want YOU to do? Mainly, I think heโ€™d want you to not give up, to not be demoralized. To find the energy and hope and faith to keep fighting. And Iโ€™d like to think that heโ€™d want you to continue to support us. I wonโ€™t presume to speak for him, but he knew we had no big backers โ€” just a lot of little backers, through crowdfunding. He liked that about us. When Charlie told me to keep fighting, I never thought it would be his last request of me. We mention Charlie a fair bit at the Rebel News office; in the new year, Tamara Lich will go from college to college convincing young people to believe in freedom, just like Charlie did. Weโ€™re going to have to hire a lot of security for Tamara. In my mind thatโ€™s the best way for us to live up to Charlieโ€™s expectations of us, donโ€™t you think? May I invite you to join us, to help me keep my final promise to Charlie? I need your help to protect Tamara, and all of our Rebel journalists who bravely go into the world. We need to pay for security guards, because police just wonโ€™t stop Antifa thugs, or transgender extremists. If you contribute $100 or more, weโ€™ll invite you on a special donors-only Zoom call early in the new year, where you can chat with me, Tamara, and our other reporters directly. And any donations of $1,000 or more will also get a one-on-one thank-you phone call from Tamara herself! I want to keep my promise to Charlie, and to you, and to my conscience: I told him I wouldnโ€™t give up, even if things get tough. And I intend to keep that promise. If you can help me โ€” by helping me keep our reporters safe โ€” please do so further down below on this page. Thanks. Charlie Kirk was killed because he was effective at spreading the message of freedom to young people. I believe we can honour his memory by recreating his campus tour here in Canada, featuring Tamara Lich, our newest Rebel reporter. I just need your help with security โ€” we must do what we can to protect her. Please help. Rebel News does ten news stories a day โ€” we tell the other side, as our motto says. But what Charlie loved most about us was when we did things in the world, like Tamaraโ€™s upcoming campus tour. Can you please help me make that tour a reality by helping us crowdfund the security for it? Any donation of $100 or more will get you on a private Zoom call with other donors to talk to Tamara and our other reporters! And any donation of $1,000 will also get you a personal one-on-one phone call from her. REPORT by Ezra Levant ๐Ÿ๐Ÿš›:

Rebel News

33,920 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 8 Monaten

Sonic $S Fantom $FTM ruined my life.๐Ÿชฆ But What's next to do about it? After 6 years of holding/DCAing into the project without a single token sold, apart from all tokens automatically sold by Binance with a thank-you letter right after, I'm now left with dust and a broken heart. I consider myself the most retarded Asian Sonic loyalist. Therefore, in this recent Lunar New Year holiday, while faking my emotions in front of family, I spent every second to think about this. It's been a long memorable journey, but also the craziest nightmare. My pleasure to meet, talk and spend hell lot of time with hundreds of people in this community, which is one of the best communities you can ever find in the crypto world. So what now? > All the coins $S and eco are down 99%? Yes, fuck. > Did I lose all my life savings? Yes, fml. > Do I believe that Sonic Labs will make a comeback? I have no idea. > But Do I want my bag to go to a big 0? No, absolutely Not. As one of the most extreme shiller/fudder of this project through 6 years, with all stages of emotions, I decided that something must change. Nobody can help me as everyone I know is already poor af. So I gotta help myself, I will have to follow the path that actually prevent all my bags from reaching fucking ZERO. Then... IT'S TIME FOR FULL BULL POSTING. ๐Ÿ’ŽโœŠ *of course with some complaints and crying in between to release some tension. It will seem like I break a record level of stupidity. It will seem like I have developed Stockholm syndrome. Oh yes, I already have mental problems with me after holding onto this for too long. BUT, I believe another Altcoin season would come soon, and all of us left here will finally have a proper meal, once again. > IF you wanna ride this Titanic with me, follow and comment, I will follow back, we in this, do this together, hero or zero. > IF you already sold and moved on, especially to all brothers that know me, leave us holders a chance to survive this, stop all negative posts please. Feel free to DM me here or on Telegram if you need someone to talk to, we all need mental therapy. *Letโ€™s see if this strategy actually works in next few months, if not, we still have a backup plan to execute. ๐Ÿง 
0:42

Sonic $S Fantom $FTM ruined my life.๐Ÿชฆ But What's next to do about it? After 6 years of holding/DCAing into the project without a single token sold, apart from all tokens automatically sold by Binance with a thank-you letter right after, I'm now left with dust and a broken heart. I consider myself the most retarded Asian Sonic loyalist. Therefore, in this recent Lunar New Year holiday, while faking my emotions in front of family, I spent every second to think about this. It's been a long memorable journey, but also the craziest nightmare. My pleasure to meet, talk and spend hell lot of time with hundreds of people in this community, which is one of the best communities you can ever find in the crypto world. So what now? > All the coins $S and eco are down 99%? Yes, fuck. > Did I lose all my life savings? Yes, fml. > Do I believe that Sonic Labs will make a comeback? I have no idea. > But Do I want my bag to go to a big 0? No, absolutely Not. As one of the most extreme shiller/fudder of this project through 6 years, with all stages of emotions, I decided that something must change. Nobody can help me as everyone I know is already poor af. So I gotta help myself, I will have to follow the path that actually prevent all my bags from reaching fucking ZERO. Then... IT'S TIME FOR FULL BULL POSTING. ๐Ÿ’ŽโœŠ *of course with some complaints and crying in between to release some tension. It will seem like I break a record level of stupidity. It will seem like I have developed Stockholm syndrome. Oh yes, I already have mental problems with me after holding onto this for too long. BUT, I believe another Altcoin season would come soon, and all of us left here will finally have a proper meal, once again. > IF you wanna ride this Titanic with me, follow and comment, I will follow back, we in this, do this together, hero or zero. > IF you already sold and moved on, especially to all brothers that know me, leave us holders a chance to survive this, stop all negative posts please. Feel free to DM me here or on Telegram if you need someone to talk to, we all need mental therapy. *Letโ€™s see if this strategy actually works in next few months, if not, we still have a backup plan to execute. ๐Ÿง 

Jackson ๐ŸŒ 

11,903 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 6 Monaten

The โ€œI never wanted any of this to be public or contentโ€ Lie, A Timeline I never wanted any of this to come out. Except I actually mean that. Itโ€™s embarrassing, itโ€™s trashy, and itโ€™s the opposite of how I want to present myself publicly. I stayed silent for months while lie after lie was spun about me behind the scenes because I didnโ€™t want to air private, messy moments from a relationship I genuinely cared about. I stayed silent out of fear, because I was told no one would believe me because he would be blindly believed on his large platform. In one of our very last conversations before I blocked him everywhere mid-October, he threatened to do a show on me, contact my employer, and โ€œturn me into the next Lindseyโ€. Why? Because I didnโ€™t want to continue apologizing to him for the 300th time about venting to someone I thought was a friend. I stayed silent because of these threats. But after Wednesday, after Chelsea posted the private video Aidan gave her, (the same one he threatened me with directly back on 10/2), and after the gaslighting, I donโ€™t have a choice anymore. So here is the timeline. Here are the receipts. Here is what actually happened. September-October 2025- I Stayed Silent Through Months of Smear Campaigns For months, several creators repeated the same false narrative that โ€œAidan never said a bad word about Meredith.โ€ Jess. Glarer. Auntie Deb. Kim. Ray from Dallas. Others. Meanwhile, Aidan was: โ€ข Badmouthing me privately and encouraging others to do so publicly, โ€ข Texting Joe โ€œFlipperheadโ€ entire paragraphs trashing me, โ€ข Aidan knew Joe would leak them (and even bragged on a stream that he did exactly that so heโ€™d leak them), โ€ข Sending Jess Machado after me for months on her large platform, โ€ข Directing people behind the scenes to paint me as a villain. โ€ข Sending random people who supported me DMs to change their mind (yes Aidan, not everyone is fooled by your bullshit and they came right to me). I ignored all of it. I said nothing. I stayed silent through daily lies because I didnโ€™t want to call more attention to it or face Aidanโ€™s wrath. November 2025 -The Rumors About โ€œMarch 4โ€ and Joe Flipperhead Flips to Team Aidan Aidan texted Joe his entire made-up version weeks ago. Joe circulated those texts on purpose. Joe threatened me with posting a video montage of mine and Aidanโ€™s private texts. Joe is a pussy so he eventually had Kristy post it for him. Creators discussed it publicly without me ever responding. I STILL didnโ€™t defend myself. November 26-27, 2025- Ratchet Chelsea: The Full 48 Hour Meltdown 11/26/25โ€” The Unprovoked Attack & The March 4 Video On Tuesday night, Chelsea came out of nowhere and launched herself straight at me, accusing me of all kinds of conspiracies from harassment to the horrific crime of sending a friend request, which is explained in vivid detail in the below post (sheโ€™s since gone somewhat viral, love this for her!) She spent the next 24 hours thoroughly embarrassing herself and the moment anyone challenged her story even slightly, she did what she always does: she imploded. Her accusations spiraled into her posting the March 4 video. On 11/26/25 at 11:08 PM, Chelsea posted the first clipโ€“a blanket, context-less snippet of me drunk saying something I immediately apologized for the next morning. At 11:50 PM, I responded because at that point, I had no choice. 11/27/25โ€” The 9-Minute Backpedal Then on Thanksgiving, Aidan tried to save face by posting that he โ€œdidnโ€™t want the video to be public.โ€ And like clockwork, nine minutes later, Chelsea came charging into the comments like a Temu-sponsored bat out of hell, scrambling to apologize, trying to rewrite reality so it looked like he didnโ€™t send her to do it. It was panicked, sloppy damage control. An amateur quality cover-up attempt that only made it more obvious how coordinated this all was. She wasnโ€™t apologizing because she grew a conscience. She was apologizing because she got caught doing exactly what sheโ€™d been primed to do. I wonder if Aidan called her โ€œyou shouldโ€™ve waited at least 20 minutes, dumbass!!!โ€. Not too bright that Chelsea. I can only imagine the regrets he must have for utilizing someone with the IQ of a pencil to do his dirty work. The Coordination Between Aidan & Chelsea Is Obvious Chelsea had virtually NO followers Wednesday morning. Aidan was one of the first. Weโ€™re supposed to believe someone with 150k followers just stumbled on an account that starts posting HIS private messages and HIS private videos? Kk. Aidan commented on her posts that same day, clearly encouraging it, continuing to this day, all while pretending he's not directing it. Kk. She confirmed in my DMs back on 11/6 that she and Aidan were aligned. And she literally wrote at 4:04 AM that she had โ€œproof,โ€ videos & screenshots she would release if I didnโ€™t โ€œstop callingโ€ her, calls she still hasnโ€™t produced a single shred of proof of. Then yesterday within 9 minutes of his post, she writes: โ€œSorry for going rogue, Aidan, I hope you donโ€™t hate my guts.โ€ Going rogue? From WHAT? Who gave you the material in the first place? The coordination is obvious to anyone with functioning brain cells. The โ€œI never wanted this publicโ€ lie Aidanโ€™s post yesterday claimed he โ€œnever wanted this to be public.โ€ Heโ€™s been threatening me for months behind the scenes to post the infamous video. To do a show on me. To send things to others to weaponize against me. If this were true, why did he instruct Chelsea to post it? Why did he share it with Jess Machado to threaten me with for the last month? Why did he share it with Joe Flipperhead, and God knows who else? If he didnโ€™t want it public, he wouldnโ€™t have shared it with anyone, let alone the girl I caught him cheating with. The timeline is clearโ€“ Chelsea posted a video at 11:08 pm on Thanksgiving Eve, I responded at 11:50 out of self defense. He leaked first. He escalated first. He weaponized it first. Trying to rewrite that now is gaslighting, pure and simple. The โ€œMeredith accused him of abuseโ€ narrative is FALSE My actions tell the truth: โ€ข I never went to police. โ€ข I never filed anything. โ€ข I never told anyone he hit me. โ€ข I never repeated it. โ€ข I apologized the next day. โ€ข We stayed together for FOUR more months after that night. โ€ข He called me 100+ times some days, even indicating heโ€™d end his life if we broke up. If he believed I was โ€œdangerous,โ€ his actions would have said that. They didnโ€™t. The only reason this is public now is because HE leaked it. Actions > drunk slurred words said because a camera was shoved in my face when I asked him repeatedly to stop filming and to leave. The Wilbur Theatre Rumorsโ€”Letโ€™s get petty for a second. This is another topic Iโ€™m cringing at discussing but we can thank Aidan for since he shared our sexual messages with Joe Flipperhead. And since some people (Auntie Deb, sweetie, this means you) insist on pushing their Dollar Store fan-fiction about the Wilbur Theatre night, letโ€™s actually walk through what happened, using facts instead of whatever drug-induced hallucinations youโ€™ve been spinning this week. The rumor goes like this- I was โ€œmad at Aidan because we didnโ€™t hook up,โ€ and to โ€œproveโ€ it, they trot out a cherry-picked text where I said I wanted to hook up, he didnโ€™t answer, and the next morning I said I was drunk and sorry. And somehow this has been spun into me being desperate, obsessed, or pining like a background character in a teenage soap opera. Adorable. Wrong, but adorable. Hereโ€™s the real plot twist-Aidan and I had already been together literally two days earlier, and shocker-that was initiated by him, not me. I didnโ€™t just โ€œshow up at the Wilburโ€. He invited me to come to the after party at Encore knowing I had a wedding earlier in the night. I wanted to see my friends there who I actually met to go with. This wasnโ€™t a surprise, it was planned ahead of time. The โ€œI was drunk, sorryโ€ message wasnโ€™t heartbreak. It wasnโ€™t longing. It was me politely tapping the brakes because I didnโ€™t even want to entertain whatever bad path it could lead us back down. And then? He texted me asking about my brotherโ€™s wedding, how I am, etc. I ignored him for a full week. Until I had no choice but to speak to him about MereNeill. That silence, from me, is what triggered his latest meltdown. Not mine. His. So no, Auntie Deb, your version isnโ€™t โ€œa different perspective.โ€ Itโ€™s just wrong. Like wildly, hilariously, not-even-in-the-ballpark wrong. But sure, keep spinning fanfic if it makes your livestreams feel more exciting. I realize itโ€™s probably been awhile since youโ€™ve had any action since youโ€™ve let yourself go so badly, so you live vicariously through others. Recap For MONTHS I ignored: โ€ข the texts he sent Joe to leak โ€ข the smear campaign โ€ข the creators parroting lies โ€ข the behind-the-scenes messages โ€ข the insinuations I hacked him and even shared revenge porn โ€ข the constant coordinated attacks โ€ข the threats of โ€œturning me into the next Lindseyโ€ โ€ข his warning that everyone would believe him because of his platform โ€ข the threats to contact my employer I didnโ€™t clap back, didnโ€™t retaliate, didnโ€™t respond. But Wednesday, when Chelsea dumped the video he gave her, the same video she threatened weeks ago to drop, AND he posted pretending he didnโ€™t want this all out? That was the line. They chose the nuclear option. And last night's gaslighting grift was just the icing on the cake. Now Iโ€™m responding with facts in pure self-defense. Conclusion/Message for Temu Storm This entire mess could have stayed private. I wanted it to stay private. But when someone leaks your private moments, lies about your intentions, weaponizes your past, and coordinates an online attack, you either let the false narrative stand or you defend yourself. Iโ€™m choosing to defend myself with receipts, not gossip. With timelines, not โ€œhe said.โ€ With evidence, not weaponized drunk clips. And then thereโ€™s Aidanโ€™s favorite delusion. The claim that I was โ€˜working with Karen behind the scenesโ€™ or โ€˜conspiring with her to get him in trouble for the recording.โ€™ That could not be further from the truth. I didnโ€™t even know he had recorded her until after she already knew about it herself. I wasnโ€™t working with her, plotting with her, or communicating with her about it. She and I have always been friendly, but we didnโ€™t even discuss the recording until it started leaking and Joe Flipperhead went feral on Twitter. Meanwhile, Aidan spent weeks screaming at me, accusing me of being some kind of secret double agent, like he was trying to create the betrayal he was terrified of. Almost a self-fulfilling prophecy. And hereโ€™s the reality: in the last few weeks, after heโ€™s gone fully scorched earth on me, I have talked to her, and I support her 100%. The things heโ€™s done to her over the past couple years, and the way he twisted it all for his followers, is the exact same manipulation I lived through. Iโ€™m not going into her details because thatโ€™s her story to tellโ€ฆ but letโ€™s just say I have a feeling youโ€™ll be hearing it sooner rather than later. The lie that Aidan never wanted this to be public is just laughable at this point. Who are we kidding? He's been foaming at the mouth for months to make this content where he can play the victim, as usual. And since this week has apparently become โ€œLetโ€™s All Fixate on Meredith Week,โ€ let me address the content-creator sideshow, too. Some of you are strangers, while some I actually considered my friends. Itโ€™s shocking but not shocking how quickly you all flip a switch and follow your captainโ€™s orders. Ray from Dallas spent his Sunday foaming at the mouth in a hostile little video about me, all bark, no substance. I saw it. Iโ€™m not intimidated. Mostly, Iโ€™m embarrassed for you. Then thereโ€™s Will, whoโ€™s gone on multiple streams calling me โ€œcrazyโ€ and pretending heโ€™s scared of me, despite me being nothing but nice to him. Why? Because he thinks I was the first one to tell Karen he heard the recording, which he absolutely did (unless Aidan is lying about who he played it for, but we know heโ€™s actually telling the truth on this for once). She was informed of it the very next day, which is why she called you and you know this. This was two full days before I was even aware of a call at all. Will, for someone with your track record, maybe sit the โ€œwomen are dangerousโ€ narrative out. Youโ€™re not fooling anyone. Iโ€™m staring at 15 pages of police reports and no, itโ€™s not all โ€œthings youโ€™ve owned up for in the pastโ€. You know this. Again, Iโ€™d take a very large seat here. And my personal favorite-Auntie Deb, who decided to spice up his Spaces on Thanksgiving by accusing me of distributing revenge p*rn with zero evidence, zero screenshots, zero anything. Accusing me of killing a turtle yesterday. A completely fabricated felony tossed around like itโ€™s gossip hour at the bingo hall. Considering your own professional history, James, Iโ€™d hope you of all people would understand how catastrophic false accusations can be, but apparently not. I wonder if youโ€™ll have that same enthusiasm when the topic is you. TBD. Iโ€™ll wait for that retraction about revenge p*rn, animal abuse, etc. Ballโ€™s in your court hun. And of course, thereโ€™s Jessica Machado, whoโ€™s been grinding this axe for months like itโ€™s her full-time personality. Hos long did you cry when Chelsea beat you to the punch with that video? Donโ€™t worry hun, thereโ€™s more but she didnโ€™t post it because itโ€™s not great for your fairytale. Since you reported my last post, I'll leave the rest up for your imagination. Youโ€™ve been so obsessed with me for so long that you canโ€™t even keep your own narratives straight anymore. I love this so much for you. Let me be crystal clearโ€“I am done being all of your punching bag. You love to spin this narrative that Iโ€™m this dangerous person. Youโ€™d think youโ€™d lay off from constantly f*cking with me if you truly believed that. I would genuinely love for this nonsense to stop. But that requires ALL of you to stop manufacturing drama, stop lying, and stop weaponizing made-up crimes for clicks. And if they want to keep going? Iโ€™ve got plenty of content for many seasons to come.
0:15

The โ€œI never wanted any of this to be public or contentโ€ Lie, A Timeline I never wanted any of this to come out. Except I actually mean that. Itโ€™s embarrassing, itโ€™s trashy, and itโ€™s the opposite of how I want to present myself publicly. I stayed silent for months while lie after lie was spun about me behind the scenes because I didnโ€™t want to air private, messy moments from a relationship I genuinely cared about. I stayed silent out of fear, because I was told no one would believe me because he would be blindly believed on his large platform. In one of our very last conversations before I blocked him everywhere mid-October, he threatened to do a show on me, contact my employer, and โ€œturn me into the next Lindseyโ€. Why? Because I didnโ€™t want to continue apologizing to him for the 300th time about venting to someone I thought was a friend. I stayed silent because of these threats. But after Wednesday, after Chelsea posted the private video Aidan gave her, (the same one he threatened me with directly back on 10/2), and after the gaslighting, I donโ€™t have a choice anymore. So here is the timeline. Here are the receipts. Here is what actually happened. September-October 2025- I Stayed Silent Through Months of Smear Campaigns For months, several creators repeated the same false narrative that โ€œAidan never said a bad word about Meredith.โ€ Jess. Glarer. Auntie Deb. Kim. Ray from Dallas. Others. Meanwhile, Aidan was: โ€ข Badmouthing me privately and encouraging others to do so publicly, โ€ข Texting Joe โ€œFlipperheadโ€ entire paragraphs trashing me, โ€ข Aidan knew Joe would leak them (and even bragged on a stream that he did exactly that so heโ€™d leak them), โ€ข Sending Jess Machado after me for months on her large platform, โ€ข Directing people behind the scenes to paint me as a villain. โ€ข Sending random people who supported me DMs to change their mind (yes Aidan, not everyone is fooled by your bullshit and they came right to me). I ignored all of it. I said nothing. I stayed silent through daily lies because I didnโ€™t want to call more attention to it or face Aidanโ€™s wrath. November 2025 -The Rumors About โ€œMarch 4โ€ and Joe Flipperhead Flips to Team Aidan Aidan texted Joe his entire made-up version weeks ago. Joe circulated those texts on purpose. Joe threatened me with posting a video montage of mine and Aidanโ€™s private texts. Joe is a pussy so he eventually had Kristy post it for him. Creators discussed it publicly without me ever responding. I STILL didnโ€™t defend myself. November 26-27, 2025- Ratchet Chelsea: The Full 48 Hour Meltdown 11/26/25โ€” The Unprovoked Attack & The March 4 Video On Tuesday night, Chelsea came out of nowhere and launched herself straight at me, accusing me of all kinds of conspiracies from harassment to the horrific crime of sending a friend request, which is explained in vivid detail in the below post (sheโ€™s since gone somewhat viral, love this for her!) She spent the next 24 hours thoroughly embarrassing herself and the moment anyone challenged her story even slightly, she did what she always does: she imploded. Her accusations spiraled into her posting the March 4 video. On 11/26/25 at 11:08 PM, Chelsea posted the first clipโ€“a blanket, context-less snippet of me drunk saying something I immediately apologized for the next morning. At 11:50 PM, I responded because at that point, I had no choice. 11/27/25โ€” The 9-Minute Backpedal Then on Thanksgiving, Aidan tried to save face by posting that he โ€œdidnโ€™t want the video to be public.โ€ And like clockwork, nine minutes later, Chelsea came charging into the comments like a Temu-sponsored bat out of hell, scrambling to apologize, trying to rewrite reality so it looked like he didnโ€™t send her to do it. It was panicked, sloppy damage control. An amateur quality cover-up attempt that only made it more obvious how coordinated this all was. She wasnโ€™t apologizing because she grew a conscience. She was apologizing because she got caught doing exactly what sheโ€™d been primed to do. I wonder if Aidan called her โ€œyou shouldโ€™ve waited at least 20 minutes, dumbass!!!โ€. Not too bright that Chelsea. I can only imagine the regrets he must have for utilizing someone with the IQ of a pencil to do his dirty work. The Coordination Between Aidan & Chelsea Is Obvious Chelsea had virtually NO followers Wednesday morning. Aidan was one of the first. Weโ€™re supposed to believe someone with 150k followers just stumbled on an account that starts posting HIS private messages and HIS private videos? Kk. Aidan commented on her posts that same day, clearly encouraging it, continuing to this day, all while pretending he's not directing it. Kk. She confirmed in my DMs back on 11/6 that she and Aidan were aligned. And she literally wrote at 4:04 AM that she had โ€œproof,โ€ videos & screenshots she would release if I didnโ€™t โ€œstop callingโ€ her, calls she still hasnโ€™t produced a single shred of proof of. Then yesterday within 9 minutes of his post, she writes: โ€œSorry for going rogue, Aidan, I hope you donโ€™t hate my guts.โ€ Going rogue? From WHAT? Who gave you the material in the first place? The coordination is obvious to anyone with functioning brain cells. The โ€œI never wanted this publicโ€ lie Aidanโ€™s post yesterday claimed he โ€œnever wanted this to be public.โ€ Heโ€™s been threatening me for months behind the scenes to post the infamous video. To do a show on me. To send things to others to weaponize against me. If this were true, why did he instruct Chelsea to post it? Why did he share it with Jess Machado to threaten me with for the last month? Why did he share it with Joe Flipperhead, and God knows who else? If he didnโ€™t want it public, he wouldnโ€™t have shared it with anyone, let alone the girl I caught him cheating with. The timeline is clearโ€“ Chelsea posted a video at 11:08 pm on Thanksgiving Eve, I responded at 11:50 out of self defense. He leaked first. He escalated first. He weaponized it first. Trying to rewrite that now is gaslighting, pure and simple. The โ€œMeredith accused him of abuseโ€ narrative is FALSE My actions tell the truth: โ€ข I never went to police. โ€ข I never filed anything. โ€ข I never told anyone he hit me. โ€ข I never repeated it. โ€ข I apologized the next day. โ€ข We stayed together for FOUR more months after that night. โ€ข He called me 100+ times some days, even indicating heโ€™d end his life if we broke up. If he believed I was โ€œdangerous,โ€ his actions would have said that. They didnโ€™t. The only reason this is public now is because HE leaked it. Actions > drunk slurred words said because a camera was shoved in my face when I asked him repeatedly to stop filming and to leave. The Wilbur Theatre Rumorsโ€”Letโ€™s get petty for a second. This is another topic Iโ€™m cringing at discussing but we can thank Aidan for since he shared our sexual messages with Joe Flipperhead. And since some people (Auntie Deb, sweetie, this means you) insist on pushing their Dollar Store fan-fiction about the Wilbur Theatre night, letโ€™s actually walk through what happened, using facts instead of whatever drug-induced hallucinations youโ€™ve been spinning this week. The rumor goes like this- I was โ€œmad at Aidan because we didnโ€™t hook up,โ€ and to โ€œproveโ€ it, they trot out a cherry-picked text where I said I wanted to hook up, he didnโ€™t answer, and the next morning I said I was drunk and sorry. And somehow this has been spun into me being desperate, obsessed, or pining like a background character in a teenage soap opera. Adorable. Wrong, but adorable. Hereโ€™s the real plot twist-Aidan and I had already been together literally two days earlier, and shocker-that was initiated by him, not me. I didnโ€™t just โ€œshow up at the Wilburโ€. He invited me to come to the after party at Encore knowing I had a wedding earlier in the night. I wanted to see my friends there who I actually met to go with. This wasnโ€™t a surprise, it was planned ahead of time. The โ€œI was drunk, sorryโ€ message wasnโ€™t heartbreak. It wasnโ€™t longing. It was me politely tapping the brakes because I didnโ€™t even want to entertain whatever bad path it could lead us back down. And then? He texted me asking about my brotherโ€™s wedding, how I am, etc. I ignored him for a full week. Until I had no choice but to speak to him about MereNeill. That silence, from me, is what triggered his latest meltdown. Not mine. His. So no, Auntie Deb, your version isnโ€™t โ€œa different perspective.โ€ Itโ€™s just wrong. Like wildly, hilariously, not-even-in-the-ballpark wrong. But sure, keep spinning fanfic if it makes your livestreams feel more exciting. I realize itโ€™s probably been awhile since youโ€™ve had any action since youโ€™ve let yourself go so badly, so you live vicariously through others. Recap For MONTHS I ignored: โ€ข the texts he sent Joe to leak โ€ข the smear campaign โ€ข the creators parroting lies โ€ข the behind-the-scenes messages โ€ข the insinuations I hacked him and even shared revenge porn โ€ข the constant coordinated attacks โ€ข the threats of โ€œturning me into the next Lindseyโ€ โ€ข his warning that everyone would believe him because of his platform โ€ข the threats to contact my employer I didnโ€™t clap back, didnโ€™t retaliate, didnโ€™t respond. But Wednesday, when Chelsea dumped the video he gave her, the same video she threatened weeks ago to drop, AND he posted pretending he didnโ€™t want this all out? That was the line. They chose the nuclear option. And last night's gaslighting grift was just the icing on the cake. Now Iโ€™m responding with facts in pure self-defense. Conclusion/Message for Temu Storm This entire mess could have stayed private. I wanted it to stay private. But when someone leaks your private moments, lies about your intentions, weaponizes your past, and coordinates an online attack, you either let the false narrative stand or you defend yourself. Iโ€™m choosing to defend myself with receipts, not gossip. With timelines, not โ€œhe said.โ€ With evidence, not weaponized drunk clips. And then thereโ€™s Aidanโ€™s favorite delusion. The claim that I was โ€˜working with Karen behind the scenesโ€™ or โ€˜conspiring with her to get him in trouble for the recording.โ€™ That could not be further from the truth. I didnโ€™t even know he had recorded her until after she already knew about it herself. I wasnโ€™t working with her, plotting with her, or communicating with her about it. She and I have always been friendly, but we didnโ€™t even discuss the recording until it started leaking and Joe Flipperhead went feral on Twitter. Meanwhile, Aidan spent weeks screaming at me, accusing me of being some kind of secret double agent, like he was trying to create the betrayal he was terrified of. Almost a self-fulfilling prophecy. And hereโ€™s the reality: in the last few weeks, after heโ€™s gone fully scorched earth on me, I have talked to her, and I support her 100%. The things heโ€™s done to her over the past couple years, and the way he twisted it all for his followers, is the exact same manipulation I lived through. Iโ€™m not going into her details because thatโ€™s her story to tellโ€ฆ but letโ€™s just say I have a feeling youโ€™ll be hearing it sooner rather than later. The lie that Aidan never wanted this to be public is just laughable at this point. Who are we kidding? He's been foaming at the mouth for months to make this content where he can play the victim, as usual. And since this week has apparently become โ€œLetโ€™s All Fixate on Meredith Week,โ€ let me address the content-creator sideshow, too. Some of you are strangers, while some I actually considered my friends. Itโ€™s shocking but not shocking how quickly you all flip a switch and follow your captainโ€™s orders. Ray from Dallas spent his Sunday foaming at the mouth in a hostile little video about me, all bark, no substance. I saw it. Iโ€™m not intimidated. Mostly, Iโ€™m embarrassed for you. Then thereโ€™s Will, whoโ€™s gone on multiple streams calling me โ€œcrazyโ€ and pretending heโ€™s scared of me, despite me being nothing but nice to him. Why? Because he thinks I was the first one to tell Karen he heard the recording, which he absolutely did (unless Aidan is lying about who he played it for, but we know heโ€™s actually telling the truth on this for once). She was informed of it the very next day, which is why she called you and you know this. This was two full days before I was even aware of a call at all. Will, for someone with your track record, maybe sit the โ€œwomen are dangerousโ€ narrative out. Youโ€™re not fooling anyone. Iโ€™m staring at 15 pages of police reports and no, itโ€™s not all โ€œthings youโ€™ve owned up for in the pastโ€. You know this. Again, Iโ€™d take a very large seat here. And my personal favorite-Auntie Deb, who decided to spice up his Spaces on Thanksgiving by accusing me of distributing revenge p*rn with zero evidence, zero screenshots, zero anything. Accusing me of killing a turtle yesterday. A completely fabricated felony tossed around like itโ€™s gossip hour at the bingo hall. Considering your own professional history, James, Iโ€™d hope you of all people would understand how catastrophic false accusations can be, but apparently not. I wonder if youโ€™ll have that same enthusiasm when the topic is you. TBD. Iโ€™ll wait for that retraction about revenge p*rn, animal abuse, etc. Ballโ€™s in your court hun. And of course, thereโ€™s Jessica Machado, whoโ€™s been grinding this axe for months like itโ€™s her full-time personality. Hos long did you cry when Chelsea beat you to the punch with that video? Donโ€™t worry hun, thereโ€™s more but she didnโ€™t post it because itโ€™s not great for your fairytale. Since you reported my last post, I'll leave the rest up for your imagination. Youโ€™ve been so obsessed with me for so long that you canโ€™t even keep your own narratives straight anymore. I love this so much for you. Let me be crystal clearโ€“I am done being all of your punching bag. You love to spin this narrative that Iโ€™m this dangerous person. Youโ€™d think youโ€™d lay off from constantly f*cking with me if you truly believed that. I would genuinely love for this nonsense to stop. But that requires ALL of you to stop manufacturing drama, stop lying, and stop weaponizing made-up crimes for clicks. And if they want to keep going? Iโ€™ve got plenty of content for many seasons to come.

The old M canโ€™t come to the phone right now

45,160 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

The โ€œI never wanted any of this to be public or contentโ€ Myth I never wanted any of this to come out. Except I actually mean that. Itโ€™s embarrassing, itโ€™s trashy, and itโ€™s the opposite of how I want to present myself publicly. I stayed silent for months while lie after lie was spun about me behind the scenes because I didnโ€™t want to air private, messy moments from a relationship I genuinely cared about. I stayed silent out of fear, because I was told no one would believe me because he would be blindly believed on his large platform. In one of our very last conversations before I blocked him everywhere mid-October, he threatened to do a show on me, contact my employer, and โ€œturn me into the next Lindseyโ€. Why? Because I didnโ€™t want to continue apologizing to him for the 300th time about venting to someone I thought was a friend. I stayed silent because of these threats. But after Wednesday, after Chelsea posted the private video Aidan gave her, (the same one he threatened me with directly back on 10/2), and after the gaslighting posts yesterday, I donโ€™t have a choice anymore. So here is the timeline. Here are the receipts. Here is what actually happened. September-October 2025- I Stayed Silent Through Months of Smear Campaigns For months, several creators repeated the same false narrative that โ€œAidan never said a bad word about Meredith.โ€ Jess. Glarer. Auntie Deb. Kim. Ray from Dallas. Others. Meanwhile, Aidan was: โ€ข Badmouthing me privately and encouraging others to do so publicly, โ€ข Texting Joe โ€œFlipperheadโ€ entire paragraphs trashing me, โ€ข Aidan knew Joe would leak them (and even bragged on a stream that he did exactly that so heโ€™d leak them), โ€ข Sending Jess Machado after me for months on her large platform, โ€ข Directing people behind the scenes to paint me as a villain. โ€ข Sending random people who supported me DMs to change their mind (yes Aidan, not everyone is fooled by your bullshit and they came right to me). I ignored all of it. I said nothing. I stayed silent through daily lies because I didnโ€™t want to call more attention to it or face Aidanโ€™s wrath. November 2025 -The Rumors About โ€œMarch 4โ€, Joe Flipperhead Flips to Team Aidan Aidan texted Joe his entire made-up version weeks ago. Joe circulated those texts on purpose. Joe threatened me with posting a video montage of mine and Aidanโ€™s private texts. Joe is a pussy so he eventually had Kristy post it for him. Creators discussed it publicly without me ever responding. I STILL didnโ€™t defend myself. November 26-27, 2025- Ratchet Chelsea: The Full 48 Hour Meltdown 11/26/25- The Unprovoked Attack & The March 4 Video On Tuesday night, Chelsea came out of nowhere and launched herself straight at me, accusing me of all kinds of conspiracies from harassment to the horrific crime of sending a friend request, which is explained in vivid detail in the below post (sheโ€™s since gone somewhat viral, love this for her!) She spent the next 24 hours thoroughly embarrassing herself and the moment anyone challenged her story even slightly, she did what she always does: she imploded. Her accusations spiraled into her posting the March 4 video. On 11/26/25 at 11:08 PM, Chelsea posted the first clipโ€“a blanket, context-less snippet of me drunk saying something I immediately apologized for the next morning. At 11:50 PM, I responded because at that point, I had no choice. 11/27/25-The Gaslighting & 9-Minute Backpedal Then yesterday, Aidan tried to save face by posting that he โ€œdidnโ€™t want the video to be public.โ€ And like clockwork, nine minutes later, Chelsea came charging into the comments like a Temu-sponsored bat out of hell, scrambling to apologize, trying to rewrite reality so it looked like he didnโ€™t send her to do it. It was panicked, sloppy damage control. An amateur quality cover-up attempt that only made it more obvious how coordinated this all was. She wasnโ€™t apologizing because she grew a conscience. She was apologizing because she got caught doing exactly what sheโ€™d been primed to do. I wonder if Aidan called her โ€œyou shouldโ€™ve waited at least 20 minutes, dumbass!!!โ€. Not too bright that Chelsea. I can only imagine the regrets he must have for utilizing someone with the IQ of a pencil to do his dirty work. The Coordination Between Aidan & Chelsea Is Obvious Chelsea had virtually NO followers Wednesday morning. Aidan was one of the first. Weโ€™re supposed to believe someone with 150k followers just stumbled on an account that starts posting HIS private messages and HIS private videos? Kk. Aidan commented on her posts that same day, clearly encouraging it. She confirmed in my DMs back on 11/6 that she and Aidan were aligned. And she literally wrote at 4:04 AM that she had โ€œproof,โ€ videos & screenshots she would release if I didnโ€™t โ€œstop callingโ€ her, calls she still hasnโ€™t produced a single shred of proof of. Then yesterday within 9 minutes of his post, she writes: โ€œSorry for going rogue, Aidan, I hope you donโ€™t hate my guts.โ€ Going rogue? From WHAT? Who gave you the material in the first place? The coordination is obvious to anyone with functioning brain cells. The โ€œI never wanted this publicโ€ lie Aidanโ€™s post yesterday claimed he โ€œnever wanted this to be public.โ€ If this were true, why did he instruct Chelsea to post it? Why did he share it with Jess Machado to threaten me with for the last month? Why did he share it with Joe Flipperhead, and God knows who else? If he didnโ€™t want it public, he wouldnโ€™t have shared it with anyone, let alone the girl I caught him cheating with. The timeline is clearโ€“ Chelsea posted a video at 11:08 pm on Thanksgiving Eve, I responded at 11:50 out of self defense. He leaked first. He escalated first. He weaponized it first. Trying to rewrite that now is gaslighting, pure and simple. He's been lighting matches behind the scenes for months, praying for this to go public. The โ€œMeredith accused him of abuseโ€ narrative is FALSE My actions tell the truth: โ€ข I never went to police. โ€ข I never filed anything. โ€ข I never told anyone he hit me. โ€ข I never repeated it. โ€ข I apologized the next day. โ€ข We stayed together for FOUR more months after that night. โ€ข He called me 100+ times some days, even indicating heโ€™d end his life if we broke up. If he believed I was โ€œdangerous,โ€ his actions would have said that. They didnโ€™t. The only reason this is public now is because HE leaked it. Actions > drunk slurred words said because a camera was shoved in my face when I asked him repeatedly to stop filming and to leave. The Wilbur Theatre Rumorsโ€”Letโ€™s get petty for a second. This is another topic Iโ€™m cringing at discussing but we can thank Aidan for since he shared our sexual messages with Joe Flipperhead. And since some people (Auntie Deb, sweetie, this means you) insist on pushing their Dollar Store fan-fiction about the Wilbur Theatre night, letโ€™s actually walk through what happened, using facts instead of whatever drug-induced hallucinations youโ€™ve been spinning this week. The rumor goes like this- I was โ€œmad at Aidan because we didnโ€™t hook up,โ€ and to โ€œproveโ€ it, they trot out a cherry-picked text where I said I wanted to hook up, he didnโ€™t answer, and the next morning I said I was drunk and sorry. And somehow this has been spun into me being desperate, obsessed, or pining like a background character in a teenage soap opera. Adorable. Wrong, but adorable. Hereโ€™s the real plot twist-Aidan and I had already been together literally two days earlier, and shocker-that was initiated by him, not me. I didnโ€™t just โ€œshow up at the Wilburโ€. He invited me to come to the after party at Encore knowing I had a wedding earlier in the night. I wanted to see my friends there who I actually met to go with. This wasnโ€™t a surprise, it was planned ahead of time. The โ€œI was drunk, sorryโ€ message wasnโ€™t heartbreak. It wasnโ€™t longing. It was me politely tapping the brakes because I didnโ€™t even want to entertain whatever bad path it could lead us back down. And then? He texted me asking about my brotherโ€™s wedding, how I am, etc. I ignored him for a full week. Until I had no choice but to speak to him about MereNeill. That silence, from me, is what triggered his latest meltdown. Not mine. His. So no, Auntie Deb, your version isnโ€™t โ€œa different perspective.โ€ Itโ€™s just wrong. Like wildly, hilariously, not-even-in-the-ballpark wrong. But sure, keep spinning fanfic if it makes your livestreams feel more exciting. I realize itโ€™s probably been awhile since youโ€™ve had any action since youโ€™ve let yourself go so badly, so you live vicariously through others. Recap For MONTHS I ignored: โ€ข the texts he sent Joe to leak โ€ข the smear campaign โ€ข the creators parroting lies โ€ข the behind-the-scenes messages โ€ข the insinuations I hacked him and even shared revenge porn โ€ข the constant coordinated attacks โ€ข the threats of โ€œturning me into the next Lindseyโ€ โ€ข his warning that everyone would believe him because of his platform โ€ข the threats to contact my employer I didnโ€™t clap back, didnโ€™t retaliate, didnโ€™t respond. But Wednesday, when Chelsea dumped the video he gave her, the same video she threatened weeks ago to drop, AND he posted pretending he didnโ€™t want this all out? That was the line. They chose the nuclear option. Now Iโ€™m responding with facts in pure self-defense. Conclusion/Message for Temu Storm This entire mess could have stayed private. I wanted it to stay private. But when someone leaks your private moments, lies about your intentions, weaponizes your past, and coordinates an online attack, you either let the false narrative stand or you defend yourself. Iโ€™m choosing to defend myself with receipts, not gossip. With timelines, not โ€œhe said.โ€ With evidence, not weaponized drunk clips. And then thereโ€™s Aidanโ€™s favorite delusion. The claim that I was โ€˜working with Karen behind the scenesโ€™ or โ€˜conspiring with her to get him in trouble for the recording.โ€™ That could not be further from the truth. I didnโ€™t even know he had recorded her until after she already knew about it herself. I wasnโ€™t working with her, plotting with her, or communicating with her about it. She and I have always been friendly, but we didnโ€™t even discuss the recording until it started leaking and Joe Flipperhead went feral on Twitter. Meanwhile, Aidan spent weeks screaming at me, accusing me of being some kind of secret double agent, like he was trying to create the betrayal he was terrified of. Almost a self-fulfilling prophecy. And hereโ€™s the reality: in the last few weeks, after heโ€™s gone fully scorched earth on me, I have talked to her, and I support her 100%. The things heโ€™s done to her over the past couple years, and the way he twisted it all for his followers, is the exact same manipulation I lived through. Iโ€™m not going into her details because thatโ€™s her story to tellโ€ฆ but letโ€™s just say I have a feeling youโ€™ll be hearing it sooner rather than later. And since this week has apparently become โ€œLetโ€™s All Fixate on Meredith Week,โ€ let me address the content-creator sideshow, too. Some of you are strangers, while some I actually considered my friends. Itโ€™s shocking but not shocking how quickly you all flip a switch and follow your captainโ€™s orders. Ray from Dallas spent his Sunday foaming at the mouth in a hostile little video about me, all bark, no substance. I saw it. Iโ€™m not intimidated. Mostly, Iโ€™m embarrassed for you. And your family(ies) will feel the same when your ass is doxxed next week. Canโ€™t wait to tAkE tHaT WaLk with you! Then thereโ€™s Will, whoโ€™s gone on multiple streams calling me โ€œcrazyโ€ and pretending heโ€™s scared of me, despite me being nothing but nice to him. Why? Because he thinks I was the first one to tell Karen he heard the recording, which he absolutely did (unless Aidan is lying about who he played it for, but we know heโ€™s actually telling the truth on this for once). She was informed of it the very next day, which is why she called you and you know this. This was two full days before I was even aware of a call at all. Will, for someone with your track record, maybe sit the โ€œwomen are dangerousโ€ narrative out. Youโ€™re not fooling anyone. Iโ€™m staring at 15 pages of police reports and no, itโ€™s not all โ€œthings youโ€™ve owned up for in the pastโ€. You know this. Again, Iโ€™d take a very large seat here. And then my personal favorite-ex-fake friend Auntie Deb, who decided to spice up his Spaces on Thanksgiving by accusing me of distributing revenge porn with zero evidence, zero screenshots, zero anything. A completely fabricated felony tossed around like itโ€™s gossip hour at the bingo hall. Considering your own professional history, James, Iโ€™d hope you of all people would understand how catastrophic false accusations can be, but apparently not. It would be a shame if I were to share the real reason around your separation at the middle school and how you wanted to bring Turtlenoy into it. This is all based on the several witnesses Iโ€™ve spoken to. See how that works? You announce things as fact based on something someone told you. I wonder if youโ€™ll have that same enthusiasm when the topic is you. TBD. Iโ€™ll wait for that retraction about revenge porn. Ballโ€™s in your court hun. And of course, thereโ€™s Jessica Machado, whoโ€™s been grinding this axe for months like itโ€™s her full-time personality. Hos long did you cry when Chelsea beat you to the punch with that video? Donโ€™t worry hun, thereโ€™s more but she didnโ€™t post it because itโ€™s not great for your fairytale. If you thought the fall-out of Kateโ€™s video was bad, Jessicaโ€ฆstay tuned. I may have been momentarily distracted dealing with the chaos from Temu Chelsea, but thereโ€™s an army of your victims out there that are eager and ready for your downfall. The false claim that I shared โ€œrevenge porn,โ€ the conspiracy theories, the wild accusations you present as fact, all of it. The 10+ streams youโ€™ve now defamed me on. Youโ€™ve been so obsessed with me for so long that you canโ€™t even keep your own narratives straight anymore. I love this so much for you. Let me be crystal clearโ€“I am done being all of your punching bag. You love to spin this narrative that Iโ€™m this dangerous person. Youโ€™d think youโ€™d lay off from constantly f*cking with me if you truly believed that. I would genuinely love for this nonsense to stop. But that requires ALL of you to stop manufacturing drama, stop lying, and stop weaponizing made-up crimes for clicks. And if they want to keep going? Iโ€™ve got plenty of content for many seasons to come.
0:57

The โ€œI never wanted any of this to be public or contentโ€ Myth I never wanted any of this to come out. Except I actually mean that. Itโ€™s embarrassing, itโ€™s trashy, and itโ€™s the opposite of how I want to present myself publicly. I stayed silent for months while lie after lie was spun about me behind the scenes because I didnโ€™t want to air private, messy moments from a relationship I genuinely cared about. I stayed silent out of fear, because I was told no one would believe me because he would be blindly believed on his large platform. In one of our very last conversations before I blocked him everywhere mid-October, he threatened to do a show on me, contact my employer, and โ€œturn me into the next Lindseyโ€. Why? Because I didnโ€™t want to continue apologizing to him for the 300th time about venting to someone I thought was a friend. I stayed silent because of these threats. But after Wednesday, after Chelsea posted the private video Aidan gave her, (the same one he threatened me with directly back on 10/2), and after the gaslighting posts yesterday, I donโ€™t have a choice anymore. So here is the timeline. Here are the receipts. Here is what actually happened. September-October 2025- I Stayed Silent Through Months of Smear Campaigns For months, several creators repeated the same false narrative that โ€œAidan never said a bad word about Meredith.โ€ Jess. Glarer. Auntie Deb. Kim. Ray from Dallas. Others. Meanwhile, Aidan was: โ€ข Badmouthing me privately and encouraging others to do so publicly, โ€ข Texting Joe โ€œFlipperheadโ€ entire paragraphs trashing me, โ€ข Aidan knew Joe would leak them (and even bragged on a stream that he did exactly that so heโ€™d leak them), โ€ข Sending Jess Machado after me for months on her large platform, โ€ข Directing people behind the scenes to paint me as a villain. โ€ข Sending random people who supported me DMs to change their mind (yes Aidan, not everyone is fooled by your bullshit and they came right to me). I ignored all of it. I said nothing. I stayed silent through daily lies because I didnโ€™t want to call more attention to it or face Aidanโ€™s wrath. November 2025 -The Rumors About โ€œMarch 4โ€, Joe Flipperhead Flips to Team Aidan Aidan texted Joe his entire made-up version weeks ago. Joe circulated those texts on purpose. Joe threatened me with posting a video montage of mine and Aidanโ€™s private texts. Joe is a pussy so he eventually had Kristy post it for him. Creators discussed it publicly without me ever responding. I STILL didnโ€™t defend myself. November 26-27, 2025- Ratchet Chelsea: The Full 48 Hour Meltdown 11/26/25- The Unprovoked Attack & The March 4 Video On Tuesday night, Chelsea came out of nowhere and launched herself straight at me, accusing me of all kinds of conspiracies from harassment to the horrific crime of sending a friend request, which is explained in vivid detail in the below post (sheโ€™s since gone somewhat viral, love this for her!) She spent the next 24 hours thoroughly embarrassing herself and the moment anyone challenged her story even slightly, she did what she always does: she imploded. Her accusations spiraled into her posting the March 4 video. On 11/26/25 at 11:08 PM, Chelsea posted the first clipโ€“a blanket, context-less snippet of me drunk saying something I immediately apologized for the next morning. At 11:50 PM, I responded because at that point, I had no choice. 11/27/25-The Gaslighting & 9-Minute Backpedal Then yesterday, Aidan tried to save face by posting that he โ€œdidnโ€™t want the video to be public.โ€ And like clockwork, nine minutes later, Chelsea came charging into the comments like a Temu-sponsored bat out of hell, scrambling to apologize, trying to rewrite reality so it looked like he didnโ€™t send her to do it. It was panicked, sloppy damage control. An amateur quality cover-up attempt that only made it more obvious how coordinated this all was. She wasnโ€™t apologizing because she grew a conscience. She was apologizing because she got caught doing exactly what sheโ€™d been primed to do. I wonder if Aidan called her โ€œyou shouldโ€™ve waited at least 20 minutes, dumbass!!!โ€. Not too bright that Chelsea. I can only imagine the regrets he must have for utilizing someone with the IQ of a pencil to do his dirty work. The Coordination Between Aidan & Chelsea Is Obvious Chelsea had virtually NO followers Wednesday morning. Aidan was one of the first. Weโ€™re supposed to believe someone with 150k followers just stumbled on an account that starts posting HIS private messages and HIS private videos? Kk. Aidan commented on her posts that same day, clearly encouraging it. She confirmed in my DMs back on 11/6 that she and Aidan were aligned. And she literally wrote at 4:04 AM that she had โ€œproof,โ€ videos & screenshots she would release if I didnโ€™t โ€œstop callingโ€ her, calls she still hasnโ€™t produced a single shred of proof of. Then yesterday within 9 minutes of his post, she writes: โ€œSorry for going rogue, Aidan, I hope you donโ€™t hate my guts.โ€ Going rogue? From WHAT? Who gave you the material in the first place? The coordination is obvious to anyone with functioning brain cells. The โ€œI never wanted this publicโ€ lie Aidanโ€™s post yesterday claimed he โ€œnever wanted this to be public.โ€ If this were true, why did he instruct Chelsea to post it? Why did he share it with Jess Machado to threaten me with for the last month? Why did he share it with Joe Flipperhead, and God knows who else? If he didnโ€™t want it public, he wouldnโ€™t have shared it with anyone, let alone the girl I caught him cheating with. The timeline is clearโ€“ Chelsea posted a video at 11:08 pm on Thanksgiving Eve, I responded at 11:50 out of self defense. He leaked first. He escalated first. He weaponized it first. Trying to rewrite that now is gaslighting, pure and simple. He's been lighting matches behind the scenes for months, praying for this to go public. The โ€œMeredith accused him of abuseโ€ narrative is FALSE My actions tell the truth: โ€ข I never went to police. โ€ข I never filed anything. โ€ข I never told anyone he hit me. โ€ข I never repeated it. โ€ข I apologized the next day. โ€ข We stayed together for FOUR more months after that night. โ€ข He called me 100+ times some days, even indicating heโ€™d end his life if we broke up. If he believed I was โ€œdangerous,โ€ his actions would have said that. They didnโ€™t. The only reason this is public now is because HE leaked it. Actions > drunk slurred words said because a camera was shoved in my face when I asked him repeatedly to stop filming and to leave. The Wilbur Theatre Rumorsโ€”Letโ€™s get petty for a second. This is another topic Iโ€™m cringing at discussing but we can thank Aidan for since he shared our sexual messages with Joe Flipperhead. And since some people (Auntie Deb, sweetie, this means you) insist on pushing their Dollar Store fan-fiction about the Wilbur Theatre night, letโ€™s actually walk through what happened, using facts instead of whatever drug-induced hallucinations youโ€™ve been spinning this week. The rumor goes like this- I was โ€œmad at Aidan because we didnโ€™t hook up,โ€ and to โ€œproveโ€ it, they trot out a cherry-picked text where I said I wanted to hook up, he didnโ€™t answer, and the next morning I said I was drunk and sorry. And somehow this has been spun into me being desperate, obsessed, or pining like a background character in a teenage soap opera. Adorable. Wrong, but adorable. Hereโ€™s the real plot twist-Aidan and I had already been together literally two days earlier, and shocker-that was initiated by him, not me. I didnโ€™t just โ€œshow up at the Wilburโ€. He invited me to come to the after party at Encore knowing I had a wedding earlier in the night. I wanted to see my friends there who I actually met to go with. This wasnโ€™t a surprise, it was planned ahead of time. The โ€œI was drunk, sorryโ€ message wasnโ€™t heartbreak. It wasnโ€™t longing. It was me politely tapping the brakes because I didnโ€™t even want to entertain whatever bad path it could lead us back down. And then? He texted me asking about my brotherโ€™s wedding, how I am, etc. I ignored him for a full week. Until I had no choice but to speak to him about MereNeill. That silence, from me, is what triggered his latest meltdown. Not mine. His. So no, Auntie Deb, your version isnโ€™t โ€œa different perspective.โ€ Itโ€™s just wrong. Like wildly, hilariously, not-even-in-the-ballpark wrong. But sure, keep spinning fanfic if it makes your livestreams feel more exciting. I realize itโ€™s probably been awhile since youโ€™ve had any action since youโ€™ve let yourself go so badly, so you live vicariously through others. Recap For MONTHS I ignored: โ€ข the texts he sent Joe to leak โ€ข the smear campaign โ€ข the creators parroting lies โ€ข the behind-the-scenes messages โ€ข the insinuations I hacked him and even shared revenge porn โ€ข the constant coordinated attacks โ€ข the threats of โ€œturning me into the next Lindseyโ€ โ€ข his warning that everyone would believe him because of his platform โ€ข the threats to contact my employer I didnโ€™t clap back, didnโ€™t retaliate, didnโ€™t respond. But Wednesday, when Chelsea dumped the video he gave her, the same video she threatened weeks ago to drop, AND he posted pretending he didnโ€™t want this all out? That was the line. They chose the nuclear option. Now Iโ€™m responding with facts in pure self-defense. Conclusion/Message for Temu Storm This entire mess could have stayed private. I wanted it to stay private. But when someone leaks your private moments, lies about your intentions, weaponizes your past, and coordinates an online attack, you either let the false narrative stand or you defend yourself. Iโ€™m choosing to defend myself with receipts, not gossip. With timelines, not โ€œhe said.โ€ With evidence, not weaponized drunk clips. And then thereโ€™s Aidanโ€™s favorite delusion. The claim that I was โ€˜working with Karen behind the scenesโ€™ or โ€˜conspiring with her to get him in trouble for the recording.โ€™ That could not be further from the truth. I didnโ€™t even know he had recorded her until after she already knew about it herself. I wasnโ€™t working with her, plotting with her, or communicating with her about it. She and I have always been friendly, but we didnโ€™t even discuss the recording until it started leaking and Joe Flipperhead went feral on Twitter. Meanwhile, Aidan spent weeks screaming at me, accusing me of being some kind of secret double agent, like he was trying to create the betrayal he was terrified of. Almost a self-fulfilling prophecy. And hereโ€™s the reality: in the last few weeks, after heโ€™s gone fully scorched earth on me, I have talked to her, and I support her 100%. The things heโ€™s done to her over the past couple years, and the way he twisted it all for his followers, is the exact same manipulation I lived through. Iโ€™m not going into her details because thatโ€™s her story to tellโ€ฆ but letโ€™s just say I have a feeling youโ€™ll be hearing it sooner rather than later. And since this week has apparently become โ€œLetโ€™s All Fixate on Meredith Week,โ€ let me address the content-creator sideshow, too. Some of you are strangers, while some I actually considered my friends. Itโ€™s shocking but not shocking how quickly you all flip a switch and follow your captainโ€™s orders. Ray from Dallas spent his Sunday foaming at the mouth in a hostile little video about me, all bark, no substance. I saw it. Iโ€™m not intimidated. Mostly, Iโ€™m embarrassed for you. And your family(ies) will feel the same when your ass is doxxed next week. Canโ€™t wait to tAkE tHaT WaLk with you! Then thereโ€™s Will, whoโ€™s gone on multiple streams calling me โ€œcrazyโ€ and pretending heโ€™s scared of me, despite me being nothing but nice to him. Why? Because he thinks I was the first one to tell Karen he heard the recording, which he absolutely did (unless Aidan is lying about who he played it for, but we know heโ€™s actually telling the truth on this for once). She was informed of it the very next day, which is why she called you and you know this. This was two full days before I was even aware of a call at all. Will, for someone with your track record, maybe sit the โ€œwomen are dangerousโ€ narrative out. Youโ€™re not fooling anyone. Iโ€™m staring at 15 pages of police reports and no, itโ€™s not all โ€œthings youโ€™ve owned up for in the pastโ€. You know this. Again, Iโ€™d take a very large seat here. And then my personal favorite-ex-fake friend Auntie Deb, who decided to spice up his Spaces on Thanksgiving by accusing me of distributing revenge porn with zero evidence, zero screenshots, zero anything. A completely fabricated felony tossed around like itโ€™s gossip hour at the bingo hall. Considering your own professional history, James, Iโ€™d hope you of all people would understand how catastrophic false accusations can be, but apparently not. It would be a shame if I were to share the real reason around your separation at the middle school and how you wanted to bring Turtlenoy into it. This is all based on the several witnesses Iโ€™ve spoken to. See how that works? You announce things as fact based on something someone told you. I wonder if youโ€™ll have that same enthusiasm when the topic is you. TBD. Iโ€™ll wait for that retraction about revenge porn. Ballโ€™s in your court hun. And of course, thereโ€™s Jessica Machado, whoโ€™s been grinding this axe for months like itโ€™s her full-time personality. Hos long did you cry when Chelsea beat you to the punch with that video? Donโ€™t worry hun, thereโ€™s more but she didnโ€™t post it because itโ€™s not great for your fairytale. If you thought the fall-out of Kateโ€™s video was bad, Jessicaโ€ฆstay tuned. I may have been momentarily distracted dealing with the chaos from Temu Chelsea, but thereโ€™s an army of your victims out there that are eager and ready for your downfall. The false claim that I shared โ€œrevenge porn,โ€ the conspiracy theories, the wild accusations you present as fact, all of it. The 10+ streams youโ€™ve now defamed me on. Youโ€™ve been so obsessed with me for so long that you canโ€™t even keep your own narratives straight anymore. I love this so much for you. Let me be crystal clearโ€“I am done being all of your punching bag. You love to spin this narrative that Iโ€™m this dangerous person. Youโ€™d think youโ€™d lay off from constantly f*cking with me if you truly believed that. I would genuinely love for this nonsense to stop. But that requires ALL of you to stop manufacturing drama, stop lying, and stop weaponizing made-up crimes for clicks. And if they want to keep going? Iโ€™ve got plenty of content for many seasons to come.

Meredith O

16,962 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

The days of calling it an โ€œalleged recordingโ€ are over. Aidan recorded Karen without her consent. Then he played that recording for multiple people with one purpose- to turn them against her. Everything Iโ€™m saying below is based on what Aidan himself told me, repeatedly, long before any of this went public. And to make it even clearer, Iโ€™m including a clip in the comments of Aidan admitting directly to me that: He did record Karen, He lied about Nurse Kim not hearing it, He said it was โ€œnot a big deal,โ€ and He admitted he has zero proof that I shared anything, because I didnโ€™t. Heโ€™s publicly accusing me of something he knows he canโ€™t prove because it never happened. Who he shared the recording with These names arenโ€™t guesses or assumptions. They came straight from Aidan. -Nurse Kim -Will -Jimmy (Auntie Deb) -Jess Machado -Others Iโ€™m not naming because they havenโ€™t lied publicly or attacked me. Will heard it. Kim heard it. Jimmy heard it. Jess publicly admitted she heard it. Aidan told each of us at different times. The initial list of 4 has since grown exponentially because he forgot who he shared it with. This is what he does. He overshares, forgets who he told, and then lies when the fallout hits. The Timeline August 26: Howie Carr announces Karen Read and team will join show. Aidan melts down and makes now-deleted tweet bashing Howie Carr. Throws shade at both Karen and Howie on his show. He even tried to beg the producer to let him go on with her. He eventually bashes said producer on twitter as well. August 28: Karen goes on Howie Carr show. Aidan throws a hissy fit because she didnโ€™t thank him (after heโ€™d been subtly attacking her for months and for going on Howieโ€™s show at all). Aug 29: Karen and Aidan have a phone call. She gets rightfully angry with him, he stays calm and secretly records her. He then uses that recording to try to convince other content creators to turn on her. At first, he told me only 4 people heard it that same day, but now that is unknown. Like everything with Aidan, he shares things impulsively and forgets who he told after. Aug 30: The very next day, someone tells Karen that she was recorded and that Will and others have heard it. Karen contacts Will and he denies hearing it. Karen accuses Aidan directly of recording her and express what a betrayal it is. Sept 1: Aidan and I speak for the first time in over a month since our breakup. He tells me Karen is โ€œaccusing him of recording her.โ€ I asked, โ€œWellโ€ฆ did you?โ€ He said yes, and followed it with, โ€œBut I think sheโ€™s bluffing because she probably doesnโ€™t have a recording.โ€ I told him thatโ€™s a very specific accusation to make out of nowhere, sheโ€™s never accused you of recording her before, someone clearly told her. He repeated the same four names he claimed heard it. He was sure no one would dare betray him by doing the right thing and being honest with Karen. (Again, that list has grown since, because he lies, shares, forgets, and backtracks.) The Following week Karen repeatedly tells him she knows he recorded her. Aidan repeatedly lies and denies it. September 8 I hear the recording myself for the first time, during lunch with him. I don't ask to hear the recording, he shoves his phone in my face to listen. The recording is not what he described, where he painted Karen as an evil c*nt, just as he's done to his followers. Karen is rightfully angry and fed up with Aidan's antics. By this point, Karen already had the recording. Whoever told Karen was not me, because I didnโ€™t even know the recording existed yet. Multiple people lied to her. She knows who they are. Someone eventually came clean. It wasnโ€™t me. Karen never wanted Aidan to be criminally charged for this or โ€œsend him to jailโ€ as heโ€™s spun his narrative. Neither did I. All she wanted was for people to stop lying to her and for Aidan to stop disrespecting her. I happily lied for Aidan for quite awhile, but since heโ€™s used me as the scapegoat for the recording leak, thatโ€™s over. Why People Lie People ask why these creators denied hearing it. Because they didnโ€™t want to choose between Aidan and Karen. They wanted continued access, relevance, and possible media opportunities. For example, Kim told me during a two-hour call in October that she โ€œdidnโ€™t know it was illegalโ€ when she heard it and felt for Karen. Sure, a loyal Turtleboy follower doesnโ€™t know about wiretapping laws. But she also didnโ€™t want the Turtleboy wrath. She denied it publicly because she wanted to keep doors open with Karen. So she went along to try to keep playing both sides. Fine with me, until she started publicly bashing me too. To the Creators Pushing Aidanโ€™s Narrativeโ€ฆ Shame On You You spent two years defending Karen, raising money off her name, and building platforms on her story, then the minute Aidan needed cover, you parroted every lie he fed you to tear her down. Hypocrisy doesnโ€™t even begin to cover it. Tonight Heโ€™s bringing on the same creators who have been lying for the last two months, the same people who denied hearing the recording even though they did. Letโ€™s see what happens tonight. Will they keep lying? Will they keep dragging Karen to protect him? Or will they finally tell the truth now that the lies have collapsed? Because the truth is no longer โ€œalleged.โ€ The clip Iโ€™m posting proves exactly what happened, in Aidanโ€™s own voice. I never wanted to do any of this. I never wanted a public war. But at some point, youโ€™re pushed so far you have no choice. Now the truth is out, all of it, including the part straight from Aidanโ€™s mouth.
1:39

The days of calling it an โ€œalleged recordingโ€ are over. Aidan recorded Karen without her consent. Then he played that recording for multiple people with one purpose- to turn them against her. Everything Iโ€™m saying below is based on what Aidan himself told me, repeatedly, long before any of this went public. And to make it even clearer, Iโ€™m including a clip in the comments of Aidan admitting directly to me that: He did record Karen, He lied about Nurse Kim not hearing it, He said it was โ€œnot a big deal,โ€ and He admitted he has zero proof that I shared anything, because I didnโ€™t. Heโ€™s publicly accusing me of something he knows he canโ€™t prove because it never happened. Who he shared the recording with These names arenโ€™t guesses or assumptions. They came straight from Aidan. -Nurse Kim -Will -Jimmy (Auntie Deb) -Jess Machado -Others Iโ€™m not naming because they havenโ€™t lied publicly or attacked me. Will heard it. Kim heard it. Jimmy heard it. Jess publicly admitted she heard it. Aidan told each of us at different times. The initial list of 4 has since grown exponentially because he forgot who he shared it with. This is what he does. He overshares, forgets who he told, and then lies when the fallout hits. The Timeline August 26: Howie Carr announces Karen Read and team will join show. Aidan melts down and makes now-deleted tweet bashing Howie Carr. Throws shade at both Karen and Howie on his show. He even tried to beg the producer to let him go on with her. He eventually bashes said producer on twitter as well. August 28: Karen goes on Howie Carr show. Aidan throws a hissy fit because she didnโ€™t thank him (after heโ€™d been subtly attacking her for months and for going on Howieโ€™s show at all). Aug 29: Karen and Aidan have a phone call. She gets rightfully angry with him, he stays calm and secretly records her. He then uses that recording to try to convince other content creators to turn on her. At first, he told me only 4 people heard it that same day, but now that is unknown. Like everything with Aidan, he shares things impulsively and forgets who he told after. Aug 30: The very next day, someone tells Karen that she was recorded and that Will and others have heard it. Karen contacts Will and he denies hearing it. Karen accuses Aidan directly of recording her and express what a betrayal it is. Sept 1: Aidan and I speak for the first time in over a month since our breakup. He tells me Karen is โ€œaccusing him of recording her.โ€ I asked, โ€œWellโ€ฆ did you?โ€ He said yes, and followed it with, โ€œBut I think sheโ€™s bluffing because she probably doesnโ€™t have a recording.โ€ I told him thatโ€™s a very specific accusation to make out of nowhere, sheโ€™s never accused you of recording her before, someone clearly told her. He repeated the same four names he claimed heard it. He was sure no one would dare betray him by doing the right thing and being honest with Karen. (Again, that list has grown since, because he lies, shares, forgets, and backtracks.) The Following week Karen repeatedly tells him she knows he recorded her. Aidan repeatedly lies and denies it. September 8 I hear the recording myself for the first time, during lunch with him. I don't ask to hear the recording, he shoves his phone in my face to listen. The recording is not what he described, where he painted Karen as an evil c*nt, just as he's done to his followers. Karen is rightfully angry and fed up with Aidan's antics. By this point, Karen already had the recording. Whoever told Karen was not me, because I didnโ€™t even know the recording existed yet. Multiple people lied to her. She knows who they are. Someone eventually came clean. It wasnโ€™t me. Karen never wanted Aidan to be criminally charged for this or โ€œsend him to jailโ€ as heโ€™s spun his narrative. Neither did I. All she wanted was for people to stop lying to her and for Aidan to stop disrespecting her. I happily lied for Aidan for quite awhile, but since heโ€™s used me as the scapegoat for the recording leak, thatโ€™s over. Why People Lie People ask why these creators denied hearing it. Because they didnโ€™t want to choose between Aidan and Karen. They wanted continued access, relevance, and possible media opportunities. For example, Kim told me during a two-hour call in October that she โ€œdidnโ€™t know it was illegalโ€ when she heard it and felt for Karen. Sure, a loyal Turtleboy follower doesnโ€™t know about wiretapping laws. But she also didnโ€™t want the Turtleboy wrath. She denied it publicly because she wanted to keep doors open with Karen. So she went along to try to keep playing both sides. Fine with me, until she started publicly bashing me too. To the Creators Pushing Aidanโ€™s Narrativeโ€ฆ Shame On You You spent two years defending Karen, raising money off her name, and building platforms on her story, then the minute Aidan needed cover, you parroted every lie he fed you to tear her down. Hypocrisy doesnโ€™t even begin to cover it. Tonight Heโ€™s bringing on the same creators who have been lying for the last two months, the same people who denied hearing the recording even though they did. Letโ€™s see what happens tonight. Will they keep lying? Will they keep dragging Karen to protect him? Or will they finally tell the truth now that the lies have collapsed? Because the truth is no longer โ€œalleged.โ€ The clip Iโ€™m posting proves exactly what happened, in Aidanโ€™s own voice. I never wanted to do any of this. I never wanted a public war. But at some point, youโ€™re pushed so far you have no choice. Now the truth is out, all of it, including the part straight from Aidanโ€™s mouth.

The old M canโ€™t come to the phone right now

527,518 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

The following is a message from Diana Bloom, an anonymous Iranian activist living in Germany who is being threatened with potentially extremely dangerous "exposure" by what appears to be a lunatic. I am passing this message on since Diana has deleted her account for her own protection and safety. To note, I don't think I should be involved with this crazy Evil Evi woman or her OSINT dramas whatsoever since she went bonkers the other day, but she is acting in defamatory ways and with malicious recklessness in a way that endanger an anonymous Iranian dissident I believe to be good, so I must pass this along. A MESSAGE FROM DIANA BLOOM This is a post in two parts. Part one is a brief summary of what has happened so far. Part two addresses the defamatory claims being made about me. PART 1 - [JL: Diana's explanation and responses] For everyone who doesnโ€™t understand what led to this point, hereโ€™s the shortest summary possible: Evi [Kokalari] and I had been friendly in DMs since the end of June. She messaged me first. After [DataRepublican] published her piece on the State Department, I asked Evi not to go too hard against DR. Evi did anyway, and James Lindsay defended DR. I didnโ€™t like the way Evi went after James, including citing Milo. So I unfollowed and removed Evi. She confronted me in DMs, and I explained why. Evi then made a post attacking James that started and ended with me and used my profile picture. I responded once, as politely as I could. Evi then repeatedly threatened to dox me, so I deactivated my account. Now, regarding the substance of the accusations she has made so far: 1. I am not a man. My name is not Derek. 2. I am Iranian. 3. I do know stuff about American politics because (and that is the boring truth) German television is really bad. So Iโ€™ve only watched English/American stuff for the past, I donโ€™t know, 15 years, podcasts, late night shows, etc. I didnโ€™t think about it, I just did. Little did I know that that would give me an understanding of the inner dynamics of whatโ€™s going on within the Republican Party that would tie back to the Iranian peopleโ€™s cause in 2026. Believe me, Iโ€™m still baffled by it whenever I pause to think about it. But thatโ€™s the truth, and here we are. 4. I am not in the United States. I shared a blog, and the provider of that blog (a big, common one) is in the United States. My VPN location is sometimes in the United States. Not me. 5. I am not responsible for the content of people defending me. I have no control over it. Itโ€™s not my content, and I keep my distance whenever I see problematic stuff. Many accounts defended me, but going to look for one that has done/said problematic stuff to tie it back to me is not right or fair. I am not responsible. I have nothing to do with it. 6. I wanted to help DR because Evi was threatening to go after her hard, and I didnโ€™t think DR deserved that. I meant no harm, I wanted to help. I made a mistake, and I regret it now, but my intention wasnโ€™t bad at that moment in time. 7. Evi herself was the first to come into my DMs and tell me not to fight with an account named Stephanie. So I did Evi that favor. Meaning: Evi came into my DMs first and tried to calm down a public disagreement between me and someone else. When I did this in defense of DR, I did the same thing Evi had done before. I would never think to accuse Evi of restricting my right to free speech because of it. 8. Publishing private DMs from someone without their permission is wrong. It is something both Evi and Stephanie have now done. Both have shared private messages from me without my permission. 9. Part of Eviโ€™s โ€œsourcesโ€ seem to be Azi Yazdi (granddaughter of Khomeiniโ€™s first foreign minister), Benji, and Nima Yamini, as well as his ghost accounts (I have blocked multiple of them by now). If you know any of them, you know this is insane. None of them are reliable. Itโ€™s like using Milo as a source against James Lindsay. This is not about truth but about a (malicious) takedown to silence me and get me out of the way. 10. Evi has threatened to dox me (there is no doubt) multiple times, and she keeps going after me. This puts my life and my familyโ€™s lives in Iran in real danger, but she doesnโ€™t care. She keeps going, and I canโ€™t stop her. She keeps putting out one lie after another, and it traps me in a forever loop of defending myself. If I donโ€™t respond to more and more accusations from her against me, rest assured, my silence should never be taken as agreement with the lies she puts out there. Be sure there is always context, a counterargument, counterevidence, etc., that would show that none of what she shares is fair or true. But itโ€™s a forever war that is meant to drain me. So me not commenting on her stuff moving forward is never, ever, ever an admission that she is right about something. Itโ€™s just a rejection of playing a game I cannot win. To ALL the people who wrote/shared one or multiple posts and comments in my defense: Thank you very, very, very much. Iโ€™ve seen it, and I am grateful. But I think itโ€™s best for my own and my familyโ€™s safety, as well as for the whole situation, that I step away and stay away from X. I hope thatโ€™s understandable. And Evi, for the last time: if you are not malicious, please just stop. Let me out of this. I am not your target. Just leave me and, through doxxing/"exposing", my family out of it moving forward. I beg of you, please. PART 2 - proof - [JL: The following are direct quotes from Evi indicating her intention to "expose" Diana, which she tries to claim is different than "doxxing," though for all practical purposes the effect will be the same and this is a distinction without a difference. The video below shows all of these quotes from her own posts.] 1. โ€œIโ€™m getting enough information on her from her own community. I may share itโ€ฆโ€ 2. โ€œEither log back in with your real name, or I will start exposing you. And trust me, you will not like that.โ€ 3. โ€œSo stop provoking me. If you continue, I will look much deeper into who you are and what your actual role is behind this anonymous account.โ€ 4. โ€œYou know what...WAR IT IS. I will start with Diana!! STAY TUNEDโ€ 5. โ€œSo I will take those words seriously and dig as deep as I canโ€ 6. โ€œThe identities of the "Iranian activists" would never have been called into question had they not attacked my right to freedom of speech in my own country.โ€ 7. Someone: โ€œShe deleted her account because sheโ€™s concerned for her safety and the safety of her relatives in Iran your threats to dox herโ€ Evi: โ€œShe should be...but if she turns out to be clean, I shall protect her identity. But trust me, she is not who she claims to beโ€ 8. โ€œLast I checked, Support on X is against fake accounts. Why are we being threatened for wanting to know the true identity of certain accountsโ€ฆโ€ 9. โ€œDo you think I know who Diana bloom is? No but I need to find out at this pointโ€ 10. โ€œ... because I asked one of their group operatives from Germany to debate me using her/his true identity, or I would expose whoโ€™s behind the account.โ€ 11. โ€œSo I donโ€™t know what youโ€™re all thinking, but this isnโ€™t simply about Diana being scared of the IRGC in Iran. The IRGC has been significantly weakened and has plenty of other things to worry about. There are thousands of Iranian accounts fighting for Iranโ€™s freedom under their own names while still having family members back in Iran. At this point, I think people have every right to ask who is actually behind these anonymous accountsโ€ฆ After a few more new posts on her feed, I was forced to tell her to either come back on X and do this under her real name, or I would expose who she was, so at least we would be having this discussion on equal grounds.โ€ 12. โ€œDonโ€™t freaking interfere with other peopleโ€™s business like that retard did and no one comes after you. So go ahead down and sue me and I will push harder to expose her and you and anyone elseโ€ฆโ€ MY OWN [JL's] COMMENTS, which Diana has nothing to do with and doesn't know I'm appending here. I now believe Evi is likely to be a malignant narcissist who is incapable of admitting that she is wrong. She will not stop in her behavior, and she will aim to harm anyone who attempts to intervene. I do not recommend you do this. I recommend you mark, avoid, and block. Fighting with her will only fuel her because she simply cannot admit that she's wrong about all of this and can only double down in increasingly insane, dangerous, and reckless ways, including toward Diana and her safety. She believes everything she sees that's trying to talk sense into her about any of this is part of an elaborate "op" that "disrespects her free speech" (which isn't a thing, by the way). No one is silencing her. People are just trying to talk sense into her to stop spreading defamation and reckless "exposure" of people who she will put at risk with it and who do not in any way deserve it, people she considered friends and allies until literally four days ago when she suddenly blew up. Therefore, not only is her reckless belief hermetically sealed against any disagreement, she turns any disagreement into proof of allegedly coordinated attacks against her from a network that simply doesn't exist. As a response, in her malignancy, she is threatening to damage, "expose," or otherwise reputationally harm anyone who even tries politely to talk sense into her, much less to disagree with her or oppose her. I strongly recommend everyone realize what they're getting into if they work with or ally themselves with this crazy woman going forward. You do so at your own risk. I can attest from watching her over the last few days that her research abilities, at least when agitated, are so sloppy as to be beyond worthless, even dangerous. The post I'm quoting below is proof of that. She's trying to prove Diana is secretly an American because she's too sloppy and stupid to realize that a Wordpress domain has an American location. She isn't doing research in good faith or with fidelity on this issue, or about me. She is looking for any information she can to hurt people who have upset her. In fact, she is presently being sued for defamation by an Albanian singer (Evi is an Albanian immigrant to the United States and a U.S. citizen for at least a couple decades), so we might recognize this bad behavior and poor praxis as a pattern with her. I can provide just from the last few days, as can others, much evidence that she's simply grasping at the nastiest straws she can find to try to harm people she has suddenly decided are her opponents because of her jealous outburst at DataRepublican and her narcissistic injury at being called on it. The sloppiness and outright retardation of her "fact" finding and "analysis" are so shocking that it's hard not to laugh even given how horrifically dangerous it is. We can therefore infer this sloppiness, recklessness, and malice-when-opposed to be at least partially true of her other "research" against her other targets, by extension. That's a shame because many of those targets are worthy of real scrutiny, which she is undermining with her loose cannon. Therefore, I insist her OSINT "research" is at best worthless and at worst maliciously harmful. In either case, it cannot be engaged by people who want to make a positive difference in the world, so mark and avoid. Evi seems good at making connections. She was quite positively in my own DMs for a while, trying to find ways to work productively together, even suggesting we start an alternative to CPAC (lol). She appears to be friends with both Eric Trump and Don Jr., though the relationship with the former appears to be more solid. She seems to have worked behind the scenes with a lot of relatively prominent Republican groups. I find all of this incredibly concerning after the events of this week, even though I wouldn't have beforehand. My own assessment from this stupid and nasty drama is that Evi's primary motivation is that she is pathologically envious of DataRepublican and her influence, likely believing it should be her in DataRepublican's place. As we can see, she isn't nearly careful or accurate enough for that. Mark and avoid. Further, though, while DataRepublican has no driving interest to be who or what she is and is doing it in service to the best of her abilities (which are considerable but still limited and imperfect as are anyone's), Evi appears to covet the role, which she has demonstrated she cannot possibly handle responsibly. Again, mark and avoid. Block if you will. I will not unblock her for this post or in the future. You can think of that whatever you want. I will rarely, almost never, say anything about her except in the defense of others she is wantonly and recklessly attacking. I will NEVER interact with her directly again, no arguments, no back and forth, no dunks, nothing. My involvement here is pure exposure and nothing else. Thank you for your attention to this matter.
0:20

The following is a message from Diana Bloom, an anonymous Iranian activist living in Germany who is being threatened with potentially extremely dangerous "exposure" by what appears to be a lunatic. I am passing this message on since Diana has deleted her account for her own protection and safety. To note, I don't think I should be involved with this crazy Evil Evi woman or her OSINT dramas whatsoever since she went bonkers the other day, but she is acting in defamatory ways and with malicious recklessness in a way that endanger an anonymous Iranian dissident I believe to be good, so I must pass this along. A MESSAGE FROM DIANA BLOOM This is a post in two parts. Part one is a brief summary of what has happened so far. Part two addresses the defamatory claims being made about me. PART 1 - [JL: Diana's explanation and responses] For everyone who doesnโ€™t understand what led to this point, hereโ€™s the shortest summary possible: Evi [Kokalari] and I had been friendly in DMs since the end of June. She messaged me first. After [DataRepublican] published her piece on the State Department, I asked Evi not to go too hard against DR. Evi did anyway, and James Lindsay defended DR. I didnโ€™t like the way Evi went after James, including citing Milo. So I unfollowed and removed Evi. She confronted me in DMs, and I explained why. Evi then made a post attacking James that started and ended with me and used my profile picture. I responded once, as politely as I could. Evi then repeatedly threatened to dox me, so I deactivated my account. Now, regarding the substance of the accusations she has made so far: 1. I am not a man. My name is not Derek. 2. I am Iranian. 3. I do know stuff about American politics because (and that is the boring truth) German television is really bad. So Iโ€™ve only watched English/American stuff for the past, I donโ€™t know, 15 years, podcasts, late night shows, etc. I didnโ€™t think about it, I just did. Little did I know that that would give me an understanding of the inner dynamics of whatโ€™s going on within the Republican Party that would tie back to the Iranian peopleโ€™s cause in 2026. Believe me, Iโ€™m still baffled by it whenever I pause to think about it. But thatโ€™s the truth, and here we are. 4. I am not in the United States. I shared a blog, and the provider of that blog (a big, common one) is in the United States. My VPN location is sometimes in the United States. Not me. 5. I am not responsible for the content of people defending me. I have no control over it. Itโ€™s not my content, and I keep my distance whenever I see problematic stuff. Many accounts defended me, but going to look for one that has done/said problematic stuff to tie it back to me is not right or fair. I am not responsible. I have nothing to do with it. 6. I wanted to help DR because Evi was threatening to go after her hard, and I didnโ€™t think DR deserved that. I meant no harm, I wanted to help. I made a mistake, and I regret it now, but my intention wasnโ€™t bad at that moment in time. 7. Evi herself was the first to come into my DMs and tell me not to fight with an account named Stephanie. So I did Evi that favor. Meaning: Evi came into my DMs first and tried to calm down a public disagreement between me and someone else. When I did this in defense of DR, I did the same thing Evi had done before. I would never think to accuse Evi of restricting my right to free speech because of it. 8. Publishing private DMs from someone without their permission is wrong. It is something both Evi and Stephanie have now done. Both have shared private messages from me without my permission. 9. Part of Eviโ€™s โ€œsourcesโ€ seem to be Azi Yazdi (granddaughter of Khomeiniโ€™s first foreign minister), Benji, and Nima Yamini, as well as his ghost accounts (I have blocked multiple of them by now). If you know any of them, you know this is insane. None of them are reliable. Itโ€™s like using Milo as a source against James Lindsay. This is not about truth but about a (malicious) takedown to silence me and get me out of the way. 10. Evi has threatened to dox me (there is no doubt) multiple times, and she keeps going after me. This puts my life and my familyโ€™s lives in Iran in real danger, but she doesnโ€™t care. She keeps going, and I canโ€™t stop her. She keeps putting out one lie after another, and it traps me in a forever loop of defending myself. If I donโ€™t respond to more and more accusations from her against me, rest assured, my silence should never be taken as agreement with the lies she puts out there. Be sure there is always context, a counterargument, counterevidence, etc., that would show that none of what she shares is fair or true. But itโ€™s a forever war that is meant to drain me. So me not commenting on her stuff moving forward is never, ever, ever an admission that she is right about something. Itโ€™s just a rejection of playing a game I cannot win. To ALL the people who wrote/shared one or multiple posts and comments in my defense: Thank you very, very, very much. Iโ€™ve seen it, and I am grateful. But I think itโ€™s best for my own and my familyโ€™s safety, as well as for the whole situation, that I step away and stay away from X. I hope thatโ€™s understandable. And Evi, for the last time: if you are not malicious, please just stop. Let me out of this. I am not your target. Just leave me and, through doxxing/"exposing", my family out of it moving forward. I beg of you, please. PART 2 - proof - [JL: The following are direct quotes from Evi indicating her intention to "expose" Diana, which she tries to claim is different than "doxxing," though for all practical purposes the effect will be the same and this is a distinction without a difference. The video below shows all of these quotes from her own posts.] 1. โ€œIโ€™m getting enough information on her from her own community. I may share itโ€ฆโ€ 2. โ€œEither log back in with your real name, or I will start exposing you. And trust me, you will not like that.โ€ 3. โ€œSo stop provoking me. If you continue, I will look much deeper into who you are and what your actual role is behind this anonymous account.โ€ 4. โ€œYou know what...WAR IT IS. I will start with Diana!! STAY TUNEDโ€ 5. โ€œSo I will take those words seriously and dig as deep as I canโ€ 6. โ€œThe identities of the "Iranian activists" would never have been called into question had they not attacked my right to freedom of speech in my own country.โ€ 7. Someone: โ€œShe deleted her account because sheโ€™s concerned for her safety and the safety of her relatives in Iran your threats to dox herโ€ Evi: โ€œShe should be...but if she turns out to be clean, I shall protect her identity. But trust me, she is not who she claims to beโ€ 8. โ€œLast I checked, Support on X is against fake accounts. Why are we being threatened for wanting to know the true identity of certain accountsโ€ฆโ€ 9. โ€œDo you think I know who Diana bloom is? No but I need to find out at this pointโ€ 10. โ€œ... because I asked one of their group operatives from Germany to debate me using her/his true identity, or I would expose whoโ€™s behind the account.โ€ 11. โ€œSo I donโ€™t know what youโ€™re all thinking, but this isnโ€™t simply about Diana being scared of the IRGC in Iran. The IRGC has been significantly weakened and has plenty of other things to worry about. There are thousands of Iranian accounts fighting for Iranโ€™s freedom under their own names while still having family members back in Iran. At this point, I think people have every right to ask who is actually behind these anonymous accountsโ€ฆ After a few more new posts on her feed, I was forced to tell her to either come back on X and do this under her real name, or I would expose who she was, so at least we would be having this discussion on equal grounds.โ€ 12. โ€œDonโ€™t freaking interfere with other peopleโ€™s business like that retard did and no one comes after you. So go ahead down and sue me and I will push harder to expose her and you and anyone elseโ€ฆโ€ MY OWN [JL's] COMMENTS, which Diana has nothing to do with and doesn't know I'm appending here. I now believe Evi is likely to be a malignant narcissist who is incapable of admitting that she is wrong. She will not stop in her behavior, and she will aim to harm anyone who attempts to intervene. I do not recommend you do this. I recommend you mark, avoid, and block. Fighting with her will only fuel her because she simply cannot admit that she's wrong about all of this and can only double down in increasingly insane, dangerous, and reckless ways, including toward Diana and her safety. She believes everything she sees that's trying to talk sense into her about any of this is part of an elaborate "op" that "disrespects her free speech" (which isn't a thing, by the way). No one is silencing her. People are just trying to talk sense into her to stop spreading defamation and reckless "exposure" of people who she will put at risk with it and who do not in any way deserve it, people she considered friends and allies until literally four days ago when she suddenly blew up. Therefore, not only is her reckless belief hermetically sealed against any disagreement, she turns any disagreement into proof of allegedly coordinated attacks against her from a network that simply doesn't exist. As a response, in her malignancy, she is threatening to damage, "expose," or otherwise reputationally harm anyone who even tries politely to talk sense into her, much less to disagree with her or oppose her. I strongly recommend everyone realize what they're getting into if they work with or ally themselves with this crazy woman going forward. You do so at your own risk. I can attest from watching her over the last few days that her research abilities, at least when agitated, are so sloppy as to be beyond worthless, even dangerous. The post I'm quoting below is proof of that. She's trying to prove Diana is secretly an American because she's too sloppy and stupid to realize that a Wordpress domain has an American location. She isn't doing research in good faith or with fidelity on this issue, or about me. She is looking for any information she can to hurt people who have upset her. In fact, she is presently being sued for defamation by an Albanian singer (Evi is an Albanian immigrant to the United States and a U.S. citizen for at least a couple decades), so we might recognize this bad behavior and poor praxis as a pattern with her. I can provide just from the last few days, as can others, much evidence that she's simply grasping at the nastiest straws she can find to try to harm people she has suddenly decided are her opponents because of her jealous outburst at DataRepublican and her narcissistic injury at being called on it. The sloppiness and outright retardation of her "fact" finding and "analysis" are so shocking that it's hard not to laugh even given how horrifically dangerous it is. We can therefore infer this sloppiness, recklessness, and malice-when-opposed to be at least partially true of her other "research" against her other targets, by extension. That's a shame because many of those targets are worthy of real scrutiny, which she is undermining with her loose cannon. Therefore, I insist her OSINT "research" is at best worthless and at worst maliciously harmful. In either case, it cannot be engaged by people who want to make a positive difference in the world, so mark and avoid. Evi seems good at making connections. She was quite positively in my own DMs for a while, trying to find ways to work productively together, even suggesting we start an alternative to CPAC (lol). She appears to be friends with both Eric Trump and Don Jr., though the relationship with the former appears to be more solid. She seems to have worked behind the scenes with a lot of relatively prominent Republican groups. I find all of this incredibly concerning after the events of this week, even though I wouldn't have beforehand. My own assessment from this stupid and nasty drama is that Evi's primary motivation is that she is pathologically envious of DataRepublican and her influence, likely believing it should be her in DataRepublican's place. As we can see, she isn't nearly careful or accurate enough for that. Mark and avoid. Further, though, while DataRepublican has no driving interest to be who or what she is and is doing it in service to the best of her abilities (which are considerable but still limited and imperfect as are anyone's), Evi appears to covet the role, which she has demonstrated she cannot possibly handle responsibly. Again, mark and avoid. Block if you will. I will not unblock her for this post or in the future. You can think of that whatever you want. I will rarely, almost never, say anything about her except in the defense of others she is wantonly and recklessly attacking. I will NEVER interact with her directly again, no arguments, no back and forth, no dunks, nothing. My involvement here is pure exposure and nothing else. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

James Lindsay, anti-Communist

26,288 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 8 Stunden

Made with Seedance 2.5 using 2 prompts (15s each) + manual stitching. PROMPT 1: โฌ‡๏ธ 15 seconds, 16:9 horizontal, one continuous photorealistic viral smartphone shot. Absurd surreal comedy scene in a small indoor hotel pool. Realistic environment: tiled walls, fluorescent ceiling lights, metal pool ladders at the sides, pool depth markers, white plastic chairs, vending machines, and 6โ€“8 normal-size spectators in swimwear standing around the pool, laughing, cheering, and filming on smartphones. A giant young sexy blonde woman in her early 20s is floating flat on her back in the pool. Her enormous head, neck, and upper shoulders float naturally on the water surface. Her face is almost horizontal, looking upward toward the ceiling. Wet slicked-back blonde hair spreads slightly in the water. She is exceptionally beautiful, youthful, glamorous, and highly photogenic, with blue eyes, glossy wet skin, and realistic pores. At the very first frame, a full-size normal middle-aged man in plaid swim trunks is already standing barefoot with BOTH FEET planted directly on the center of the giant womanโ€™s forehead above her eyebrows. He is holding a white cup. The man is approximately 180 cm tall in the world of the scene. He is NOT miniature, NOT toy-sized, NOT dwarf-sized, NOT shrunken. His size, height, head size, and body proportions must match the men standing around the pool. He must also match the human scale of the pool ladders, chairs, and vending machines. Only the woman is gigantic. The man is NOT standing on a ladder, NOT standing on the pool edge, and NOT climbing down from anywhere. The pool ladders exist only in the background and never interact with him. The giant woman remains lying flat on her back throughout the scene. Her enormous face floats on the water while the full-size normal man stands clearly on top of her forehead. Do not make him grab her nose. ACTION: 0โ€“3s: Wide poolside smartphone shot. The giant blonde woman floats flat on her back. The full-size normal 180 cm man is already balancing on her forehead with both feet. The crowd behind them laughs and films. She looks upward at him with amused, slightly confused eyes. 3โ€“6s: The man moves quickly and awkwardly across her forehead, taking faster unsteady steps and windmilling his arms while trying not to fall. He should not move carefully or slowly. The crowd reacts louder. The phone camera does a slight shaky push-in. 6โ€“9s: He slips suddenly and slides faster down the slope of her giant face toward her nose and mouth. His white cup flies out of his hand. Her eyes track him and her expression changes from amused confusion to surprised disbelief. 9โ€“12s: She opens her mouth very wide in sudden surprise. He slides directly into the open mouth much faster, feet-first, with a more dramatic loss of balance. 12โ€“15s: He falls completely into her open mouth and disappears fully inside. No part of him remains outside. She closes her mouth, blinks in shock, and the people around the pool erupt in cheers, laughter, raised hands, and excited phone filming. CAMERA / REALISM: One continuous viral smartphone shot from poolside, slightly handheld, natural framing, mild compression, realistic fluorescent indoor lighting, convincing wet skin, water reflections, and splashes. No cinematic grading. The impossible scale should still look weirdly believable: giant woman floating on the water + full-size normal 180 cm man standing on her face + normal-size crowd behind them. TONE: Funny, surreal, visually shocking, and energetic, but not horror. No gore, no blood, no violence, no body horror. CRITICAL NEGATIVES: NO man on ladder. NO man on pool edge. NO man climbing into frame. NO nose grabbing. NO miniature man. NO toy-sized man. NO dwarf-sized man. NO shrunken man. NO woman upright in the water. NO giant head standing vertically. NO scale changes. NO broken anatomy. NO extra limbs. NO glitchy transitions. ---- PROMPT 2 (with a screenshot of the man as a reference): โฌ‡๏ธ 15 seconds, 16:9 horizontal Use the provided man as the reference identity. Keep his face, hairstyle, age, body type, and plaid swim trunks recognizable. He is the same man from the previous scene. Photorealistic absurd surreal comedy continuation. The man is rushing through a huge surreal internal tunnel inspired by a human colon/rectum, but presented like a bizarre water slide. The tunnel is fleshy, pinkish, wet, and organic-looking, with curved tubular walls, but it stays clean and surreal โ€” no gore, no blood, no fecal content. Water rushes around him as if he is riding an impossible fleshy water slide. The man is visible in the frame for most of the sequence, sliding, spinning, yelling, and trying to hold on as he gets carried forward by the rushing water. The tunnel gradually opens into daylight. He shoots out of the end of the surreal organic slide into a bright real outdoor waterpark splash pool. Realistic sunny waterpark setting: colorful slides, shallow pool, splashing water, and a crowd of people cheering and clapping as he bursts out and lands in the water. He pops up from the splash, shocked but unharmed, while everyone applauds. CAMERA STYLE: cinematic but still realistic, smooth motion as if the camera follows him inside the tunnel, then a clean wide exterior shot for the final exit. Strong realism, good water physics, clear continuity, exciting but playful tone. Tone: surreal, hilarious, high-energy, impossible but convincing. Not disgusting, not gory, not sexual. More like a bizarre theme-park sequence. ACTION TIMING: - 0โ€“4s: Inside the surreal organic tunnel, the man slides feet-first through the wet curved passage while splashing water rushes around him. - 4โ€“8s: He tumbles and spins through the fleshy water-slide tunnel, still clearly visible, yelling and flailing. - 8โ€“11s: The tunnel brightens ahead as daylight appears. He accelerates toward the opening. - 11โ€“15s: He blasts out into a real outdoor waterpark pool in a huge splash, the crowd cheers and claps, and he surfaces looking stunned but okay. Important: preserve the manโ€™s identity from the reference. Keep him visible for most of the interior ride. Make the internal tunnel feel like a surreal organic water slide, not graphic anatomy. No gore, no fecal imagery, no body horror, no broken limbs, no glitching. #AIVideo
0:30

Made with Seedance 2.5 using 2 prompts (15s each) + manual stitching. PROMPT 1: โฌ‡๏ธ 15 seconds, 16:9 horizontal, one continuous photorealistic viral smartphone shot. Absurd surreal comedy scene in a small indoor hotel pool. Realistic environment: tiled walls, fluorescent ceiling lights, metal pool ladders at the sides, pool depth markers, white plastic chairs, vending machines, and 6โ€“8 normal-size spectators in swimwear standing around the pool, laughing, cheering, and filming on smartphones. A giant young sexy blonde woman in her early 20s is floating flat on her back in the pool. Her enormous head, neck, and upper shoulders float naturally on the water surface. Her face is almost horizontal, looking upward toward the ceiling. Wet slicked-back blonde hair spreads slightly in the water. She is exceptionally beautiful, youthful, glamorous, and highly photogenic, with blue eyes, glossy wet skin, and realistic pores. At the very first frame, a full-size normal middle-aged man in plaid swim trunks is already standing barefoot with BOTH FEET planted directly on the center of the giant womanโ€™s forehead above her eyebrows. He is holding a white cup. The man is approximately 180 cm tall in the world of the scene. He is NOT miniature, NOT toy-sized, NOT dwarf-sized, NOT shrunken. His size, height, head size, and body proportions must match the men standing around the pool. He must also match the human scale of the pool ladders, chairs, and vending machines. Only the woman is gigantic. The man is NOT standing on a ladder, NOT standing on the pool edge, and NOT climbing down from anywhere. The pool ladders exist only in the background and never interact with him. The giant woman remains lying flat on her back throughout the scene. Her enormous face floats on the water while the full-size normal man stands clearly on top of her forehead. Do not make him grab her nose. ACTION: 0โ€“3s: Wide poolside smartphone shot. The giant blonde woman floats flat on her back. The full-size normal 180 cm man is already balancing on her forehead with both feet. The crowd behind them laughs and films. She looks upward at him with amused, slightly confused eyes. 3โ€“6s: The man moves quickly and awkwardly across her forehead, taking faster unsteady steps and windmilling his arms while trying not to fall. He should not move carefully or slowly. The crowd reacts louder. The phone camera does a slight shaky push-in. 6โ€“9s: He slips suddenly and slides faster down the slope of her giant face toward her nose and mouth. His white cup flies out of his hand. Her eyes track him and her expression changes from amused confusion to surprised disbelief. 9โ€“12s: She opens her mouth very wide in sudden surprise. He slides directly into the open mouth much faster, feet-first, with a more dramatic loss of balance. 12โ€“15s: He falls completely into her open mouth and disappears fully inside. No part of him remains outside. She closes her mouth, blinks in shock, and the people around the pool erupt in cheers, laughter, raised hands, and excited phone filming. CAMERA / REALISM: One continuous viral smartphone shot from poolside, slightly handheld, natural framing, mild compression, realistic fluorescent indoor lighting, convincing wet skin, water reflections, and splashes. No cinematic grading. The impossible scale should still look weirdly believable: giant woman floating on the water + full-size normal 180 cm man standing on her face + normal-size crowd behind them. TONE: Funny, surreal, visually shocking, and energetic, but not horror. No gore, no blood, no violence, no body horror. CRITICAL NEGATIVES: NO man on ladder. NO man on pool edge. NO man climbing into frame. NO nose grabbing. NO miniature man. NO toy-sized man. NO dwarf-sized man. NO shrunken man. NO woman upright in the water. NO giant head standing vertically. NO scale changes. NO broken anatomy. NO extra limbs. NO glitchy transitions. ---- PROMPT 2 (with a screenshot of the man as a reference): โฌ‡๏ธ 15 seconds, 16:9 horizontal Use the provided man as the reference identity. Keep his face, hairstyle, age, body type, and plaid swim trunks recognizable. He is the same man from the previous scene. Photorealistic absurd surreal comedy continuation. The man is rushing through a huge surreal internal tunnel inspired by a human colon/rectum, but presented like a bizarre water slide. The tunnel is fleshy, pinkish, wet, and organic-looking, with curved tubular walls, but it stays clean and surreal โ€” no gore, no blood, no fecal content. Water rushes around him as if he is riding an impossible fleshy water slide. The man is visible in the frame for most of the sequence, sliding, spinning, yelling, and trying to hold on as he gets carried forward by the rushing water. The tunnel gradually opens into daylight. He shoots out of the end of the surreal organic slide into a bright real outdoor waterpark splash pool. Realistic sunny waterpark setting: colorful slides, shallow pool, splashing water, and a crowd of people cheering and clapping as he bursts out and lands in the water. He pops up from the splash, shocked but unharmed, while everyone applauds. CAMERA STYLE: cinematic but still realistic, smooth motion as if the camera follows him inside the tunnel, then a clean wide exterior shot for the final exit. Strong realism, good water physics, clear continuity, exciting but playful tone. Tone: surreal, hilarious, high-energy, impossible but convincing. Not disgusting, not gory, not sexual. More like a bizarre theme-park sequence. ACTION TIMING: - 0โ€“4s: Inside the surreal organic tunnel, the man slides feet-first through the wet curved passage while splashing water rushes around him. - 4โ€“8s: He tumbles and spins through the fleshy water-slide tunnel, still clearly visible, yelling and flailing. - 8โ€“11s: The tunnel brightens ahead as daylight appears. He accelerates toward the opening. - 11โ€“15s: He blasts out into a real outdoor waterpark pool in a huge splash, the crowd cheers and claps, and he surfaces looking stunned but okay. Important: preserve the manโ€™s identity from the reference. Keep him visible for most of the interior ride. Make the internal tunnel feel like a surreal organic water slide, not graphic anatomy. No gore, no fecal imagery, no body horror, no broken limbs, no glitching. #AIVideo

Alpha Mom

90,443 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 12 Tagen

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-
0:38

Dumbing Down II "By Faith, this is the last rent I am paying as a single lady. If you support me to pay this rent, by the grace of God, this time next year, I will be in my husband's house." is back begging for support to pay another rent. Not because God didn't bring eligible suitors her way, but because her PASTOR has replaced the Holy Spirit in her life. Pastors ruin a lot of destinies when they insist on playing God instead of their primary role as destiny guides. Many members have submitted their free will to their pastors, giving their pastors the power that God himself didn't take from us from the dawn of creation. When you take the ability of the individual to act as a free agent in the name of religion, you reduce him or her to a puppet and yourself to a puppeteer. You want to pull the strings of the lives of thousands of born-again Christians at the same time while rendering them useless to follow their paths in Christ and grow into mature sons. I was at a Church in Anthony village about three years ago to minister, and I met this young man who was schooled at a very prestigious university in the USA. He was the in-house IT consultant of the church, and the pastor placed him on a monthly stipend while he was working for God. It was the Pastor who introduced the young man to me while boasting that God had given him the most capable hands to help him in ministry. I asked him if he had any Python, Java, cloud engineering, data management, digital marketing, coding, or similar tasks available for the young man in the church. He said no. I said, "You are giving this young man the job that any young school leaver who is proficient in computer appreciation can do, and you don't see it as limiting his capabilities and rendering his skills obsolete?" You would rather boast that you are ruining a destiny to build up your own profile rather than set this young man on the path of excellence? Did God call him into ministry as a preacher? Is he understudying you in preparation for his own ministry? The pastor said, "No, I plan that as the church expands, he will head our digital infrastructure and position us for the future." I said, "He can do that as a consultant or even as a member, he shouldn't be doing that while you are paying him 100,000 Naira a month. He should be out there, flying with his peers and earning in dollars! The only exception is if the Lord has called him to be a preacher and he is understudying you as your personal assistant, as led by the Lord as part of his season of preparation. Anything other than that is injurious to his destiny!" The pastor had never seen it that way When I was done ministering in the church, the young man hugged me and thanked me profusely. He said his mother sent him to the pastor when he returned from the USA and the pastor immediately told him that God had need of him in the ministry or he would die without fulfilling his purpose. Why do pastors do this? I have another case from the Northern part of Nigeria. A young lady reached out to me seeking clarity regarding her future She said her Apostle told her she has been raised by God to sing in his church choir, but she is a medical doctor by training and desires to further her studies abroad Every time she raised the issue with the Apostle, he shut her down and told her she was struggling with the will of God "Why can't you just submit to God and serve in the choir and watch as God will take your voice all over the world as this ministry grows?" The young lady said she knows she has a good voice and sings very well as one who is full of the Holy Spirit, but she does not want to be "Sinach", she wants to fulfil her dream of practising as a Pediatrician. She was wary of incurring the wrath and curse of the Apostle, however, and did not know how to extricate herself from the situation. The apostle did not see anything wrong with his actions because he was a user of people who believed that in order to fulfill his own desire to become a big ministry, others could not thrive and grow in their visions and ministries as ordained by God. This is witchcraft. It is not of God. Jesus didn't lead his disciples this way. Insecurity is the undoing of many African so-called Pastors and Spiritual leaders, and they hide behind the illusion of divinity to put others in bondage. I experienced this firsthand as a young graduate, so I understand how a pastor trying to build his ministry could see the potential in a young man or woman and try very hard to turn such a person into servants and house helps in the name of discipling them or training them for kingdom relevance You graduate from the University and join the labour force, you apply for many jobs, and at a point, you tell yourself it is important to seek supernatural guidance in your quest to fulfil destiny Somebody somewhere tells you about a church or a ministry, you join, and you are convinced the church is good. You also tell your friends, and they join. But you are all fresh graduates who are heading into the future one way or the other, but this pastor wants you to be his flock. To him, his church of ten members had suddenly become a church of 30 members because of you guys, and he wants to keep the numbers growing, so he begins to give you prophesies that were not of God but with the aim of keeping you in the fold for as long as possible. He told young graduates who ought to go for NYSC that God is telling him they should give it up for service to God in the vineyard. The mother of two of the ladies in the fellowship, whose daughters told that the pastor told them not to go for NYSC, quickly removed them from the fellowship before the seed of corruption being planted by this pastor would bear fruit The others also left as soon as they could gather their wit People who you ought to guide on their path in sincerity ran as far as they could from you based on how you chose to manipulate rather than nurture them. A married woman whose husband worked abroad was a trained secretary, and while her husband was abroad, catering to the needs of the family, he begged her to stop working so that she could focus on raising the children. She was raising five children all by herself, and combining this with a job seemed a bit too much at the time. One of the vital institutions for raising godly children was the church This woman attended church regularly with her children and even volunteered to spend any free time she had typing the pastor's sermons, Sunday School pamphlets, handouts, books, journals, and other church reports and documents She was not officially employed to do the work; she just saw that she could take some of the secretarial duties on during her downtime, and she did so with all sincerity. The church enjoyed her free services for five years until the pastor forgot completely that she was doing the church a favour One day, the woman came to church to tell the pastor that her husband would be returning home to visit the family, and she would not be available for a few days because she had to pick her husband up from the airport and ensure that he settled in properly. Unfortunately, that weekend was the weekend of the church's anniversary, and the pastor had a lot of secretarial work to do. He told the woman God said she should pick one. Heaven or marriage. He said if she goes to pick her husband from the airport, she has chosen the world and forsaken the Lord. The woman wept all the way home, It was not the thank you, thou faithful servant report she had worked day and night for many years to get that she received. She went to pick her husband from the airport and distanced herself from any church founded by any individual after that experience. She said the ambition of church founders requires that they use people to build, even though they lacked the resources to pay or compensate such people, so they resort to blackmail, coercion, lies, fake prophesies, promises, and manipulations to get things done while keeping their followers on a leash. Followers are also enablers as they refuse to read the Bible for themselves and walk in the light of the word of God. No one should be able to take you captive in the name of God, Jesus, all the angels, or any form of miracle if you know the word of God. The word of God is profitable to make one wise, and therefore, anyone who knows the word of God cannot fall victim to any false doctrine, teaching, spiritual manipulations, or lies. All the false teachings of someone being a covering for someone else came from these manipulative narratives, and believers should be wise to them. I have seen a pastor declare that his church is the only church in Africa that is licensed by God to take people to heaven, and some members believed him. The day he said that, all his members ought to laugh, pick up their Bibles, and leave without looking back. Self-aggrandisement has become the order of the day in some churches, the pastor sells himself as the be-all and end-all of the member's spiritual enlightenment, and the members sheepishly surrender their eyes of their understanding to him or her. He or she must determine where they work, whom they marry, who they associate with, whose music they must listen to, and whose sermons they must hear. If they want to travel, he must see if the road is clear on their behalf, if they want to build a house, he must approve, if he does not dedicate their baby, the baby is illegitimate. This is not the faith Christ or the Apostles died for. Jesus died that you might be free of religion. Christianity is not a religion, it is the opposite. It is individualistic and determined by the faith and belief system of the one rather than the many. Salvation, therefore, is a personal affair, and the baptism of the Holy Spirit is also a personal affair Religion is the opium of the masses, and Christianity is the salvation of the individual and his or her walk with God. When we fellowship together, we do so not so we can get brainwashed by one "super Christian" but so that we can minister to the Lord and minister to one another in the presence of God. Every believer must hold this truth to be self-evident. PS: Someone sent me the video of a pastor condemning a song recently released by a fellow believer, which is making a global impact The Pastor represents an old school of Christians who are unfit to be custodians of the gospel due to their rigidity and limited understanding of the finished work of Christ. Disciples of the gospel of Works and Performance lack creativity and discernment but are good stewards of rigidity and religious doctrines. In other words, a Pharisee must act like one, and Jesus must act like Jesus. We are all just being true to our nature. "I can never go back o No...No It's already too late o No...No Where Am I going to... No...No" If you read to this point, when I was in Spain, I asked a very important question about a meal. If you know the answer, I'm inside the comment section. -GSW-

Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo

28,681 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

Seedance 2.5 is incredible It can take you to any city in the world. Xin chร o Viแป‡t Nam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ It feels like I actually traveled to Hanoi, Vietnam! ๐Ÿ‘‡Feel free to add any city youโ€™d like to visit to this prompt. HANOI TRAVEL VLOG โ€” 30 SEC No reference image. The woman below is described in words and must be built from the text alone. SUBJECT: one Korean woman, early 20s, the only person the film follows. Small oval face with a soft jawline, large round eyes with double lids, a small straight nose, full coral-red lips, fair skin. Black wavy hair tied low at the nape and pulled forward over one shoulder, with loose strands left at the temples. A small gold hoop in each ear. Real Korean skin texture with visible pores โ€” no doll-like AI smoothness, no beauty filter. The face established in the first shot is repeated exactly in every following shot: same features, same hair, same colour. She never morphs into a different person and no lookalike appears. OUTFIT (identical throughout): burgundy ribbed knit halter top, cream high-waist flared trousers, tan leather belt with a gold buckle, burgundy platform heeled sandals, a thin gold bracelet on one wrist. There is no changing shot. CAMERA: she is filming herself on her own phone. Most shots are selfies with her arm extended; objects and food are shot by turning the phone toward them. 16:9 landscape throughout, no black bars. 26mm phone lens, deep focus, neutral iPhone colour, handheld jolt on every step, autofocus landing a beat late, exposure lagging when she moves from bright to dark, a fingerprint smudge bleeding beside strong lights. No cinematic grading, no studio lighting, no glow fx. Background people stay out of focus and nobody looks at the camera for long. DIALOGUE: lines are short and land in one breath. An interjection plus one short sentence is fine, but never two complete sentences strung together. There is breath between them and they are never rushed into each other. Punctuation is used once โ€” no doubled question marks or exclamation marks. The two Vietnamese greetings are not fluent โ€” just phrases she has picked up. (0:00โ€“0:02) โ€” Hotel window, Hanoi morning reveal. Selfie, low angle. She shoves the curtain sideways and narrow tube houses under bundled cables open up behind her. The window blows out white, then the exposure catches up. Bright grin. Dialogue: "Xin chร o~ ํ•˜๋…ธ์ด ์™”๋‹ค!" Transition: Hard cut on beat (0:02โ€“0:04) โ€” Old Quarter junction, a river of motorbikes. Selfie, stepping out between the bikes. She swings the phone to her face while a stream of helmets and conical hats flows behind her, horns overlapping. Overcast daylight, deep focus. Dialogue: "์ด๊ฑธ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ฑด๋„ˆ?" Transition: Fast cut on beat (0:04โ€“0:06) โ€” Street cafรฉ. Selfie, arm short. She pushes a glass with condensed milk settled at the bottom toward the lens until it fills half the frame, eyebrows raised. Low backless stools, a stained yellow French wall behind. Transition: Snap cut (0:06โ€“0:08) โ€” Alley bรกnh mรฌ cart. Insert, phone pointed down at her hands. A baguette split over the charcoal is handed to her in newspaper and she peels the paper down with her fingertips. Steam rises and a few sprigs of coriander stick out of the split. White tube light on the cart, a parked motorbike beside it. Transition: Cut on natural movement (0:08โ€“0:09.75) โ€” Huc Bridge reveal. She raises the phone from her face and tilts it up until the red wooden bridge crossing the lake fills the frame. Natural daylight, sky blown out behind a banyan tree. Her mouth opens slightly. Transition: Soft cut mid-upward motion (0:09.75โ€“0:12) โ€” Train Street cafรฉ. Selfie. On a low stool beside the track she is holding a coffee glass in both hands; hearing it come she sets the glass down and pulls her stool back against the wall. She looks at the lens, then sideways, and her face collapses into a laugh as a train comes out of the far end of the lane and passes an arm's length away. Dialogue: "ํ— ์ง„์งœ ์˜จ๋‹ทใ…‹ใ…‹ใ…‹ใ…‹" Transition: Cut on the end of the laugh (0:12โ€“0:13.75) โ€” Old Quarter, the 36 streets. Follow from behind, phone low. She shoulders through the packed lane with the bรกnh mรฌ, finishes the last piece and folds the newspaper away. Unlit lanterns and signs stacked tight overhead, people pushing past. Overcast afternoon light. Transition: Cut on forward movement (0:13.75โ€“0:15.5) โ€” Back seat of a cyclo. Her hands are empty now โ€” the phone low at knee height in one hand, the rail in the other. The street slides past under the folded canopy, the driver's back swaying in front. She looks out, not at the lens. The music drops a beat, leaving only wheels and horns. Transition: Snap cut (0:15.5โ€“0:18) โ€” PhแปŸ shop. From here the image is camcorder: blooming tape, light noise, late focus. The camera is fixed at eye level across the counter, no phone or camera visible in frame. Medium. She sits down on a low blue stool under a hand-painted PhแปŸ sign. The owner sets a steaming bowl of beef phแปŸ down โ€” thin-sliced beef, rice noodles, spring onion, a side plate of sprouts and basil. Dialogue: "์Œ€๊ตญ์ˆ˜! ์ด๊ฑฐ ๋จน์œผ๋Ÿฌ ์™”์–ด~" Transition: Cut on the bowl landing (0:18โ€“0:20) โ€” Lifting the noodles. Macro, phone lowered to the bowl, shallow focus. She draws rice noodles up out of the clear broth with her chopsticks, steam climbing. The steam crosses the lens and one side of the frame hazes over and clears. Only the broth and the slurping at the next stool. Transition: Cut with the noodles still raised (0:20โ€“0:22) โ€” First mouthful. Selfie, handheld. She pulls in a big mouthful, closes her eyes and opens them. Her shoulders drop and she nods once at the lens. Just after sundown, the white fluorescent light of the shop. Dialogue: "๋ฏธ์ณค๋‹ค ์ง„์งœ." Transition: Cut where her face softens (0:22โ€“0:23.5) โ€” The broth. Selfie, close. She lifts the bowl in both hands, tips it back, sets it down and lets out a breath. The lens fogs with steam. Sound only. Transition: Cut back to phone image quality (0:23.5โ€“0:27) โ€” Tแบก Hiแป‡n beer street โ˜…signature. She steps into the narrow lane on an extended-arm selfie, walking between the rows of low plastic stools set out on the ground, and slowly lifts her head. Red, yellow and green lanterns hung low across the lane slide over her face and the same colours bleed across the wet ground. Rack focus โ€” her face sharp, the signs behind spreading. Practical light only, no glow. 60% slow motion. Transition: Soft cut with her head still up (0:27โ€“0:30) โ€” Long Biรชn Bridge, night reveal. Close selfie โ†’ arm extends โ†’ the river and the Hanoi night open up below. Wind pushes her bangs across her eyes once. Natural night phone exposure. Dialogue: "๊ทธ๋Ÿผ ๋ชจ๋‘ tแบกm biแป‡t~!" She waves broadly at the camera and that same hand covers the lens as the frame goes dark. AUDIO: real location sound over the music. Unbroken motorbike horns and engines, stools scraping the pavement, charcoal sizzling, a train horn and rails, cyclo wheels, broth boiling and chopsticks, slurping at the next stool, night street noise, wind. Her muttering is natural Korean. CONSISTENCY: the same face, the same hair and the same clothes in every shot. Hands and chopsticks are natural with no smeared fingers. No text, no subtitles, no logo and no watermark on screen. No filming equipment is visible in frame. FINALLY: this has to look like footage a real person shot on a phone. Nothing about the face, the skin or the movement should read as AI-generated. Every line of dialogue is enunciated clearly, syllable by syllable โ€” no slurring, no swallowed syllables, no clipped word endings, and the tense consonants and final consonants of Korean are pronounced accurately. Expressions and gestures are not performed; they are what the moment would naturally produce.
0:31

Seedance 2.5 is incredible It can take you to any city in the world. Xin chร o Viแป‡t Nam ๐Ÿ‡ป๐Ÿ‡ณ It feels like I actually traveled to Hanoi, Vietnam! ๐Ÿ‘‡Feel free to add any city youโ€™d like to visit to this prompt. HANOI TRAVEL VLOG โ€” 30 SEC No reference image. The woman below is described in words and must be built from the text alone. SUBJECT: one Korean woman, early 20s, the only person the film follows. Small oval face with a soft jawline, large round eyes with double lids, a small straight nose, full coral-red lips, fair skin. Black wavy hair tied low at the nape and pulled forward over one shoulder, with loose strands left at the temples. A small gold hoop in each ear. Real Korean skin texture with visible pores โ€” no doll-like AI smoothness, no beauty filter. The face established in the first shot is repeated exactly in every following shot: same features, same hair, same colour. She never morphs into a different person and no lookalike appears. OUTFIT (identical throughout): burgundy ribbed knit halter top, cream high-waist flared trousers, tan leather belt with a gold buckle, burgundy platform heeled sandals, a thin gold bracelet on one wrist. There is no changing shot. CAMERA: she is filming herself on her own phone. Most shots are selfies with her arm extended; objects and food are shot by turning the phone toward them. 16:9 landscape throughout, no black bars. 26mm phone lens, deep focus, neutral iPhone colour, handheld jolt on every step, autofocus landing a beat late, exposure lagging when she moves from bright to dark, a fingerprint smudge bleeding beside strong lights. No cinematic grading, no studio lighting, no glow fx. Background people stay out of focus and nobody looks at the camera for long. DIALOGUE: lines are short and land in one breath. An interjection plus one short sentence is fine, but never two complete sentences strung together. There is breath between them and they are never rushed into each other. Punctuation is used once โ€” no doubled question marks or exclamation marks. The two Vietnamese greetings are not fluent โ€” just phrases she has picked up. (0:00โ€“0:02) โ€” Hotel window, Hanoi morning reveal. Selfie, low angle. She shoves the curtain sideways and narrow tube houses under bundled cables open up behind her. The window blows out white, then the exposure catches up. Bright grin. Dialogue: "Xin chร o~ ํ•˜๋…ธ์ด ์™”๋‹ค!" Transition: Hard cut on beat (0:02โ€“0:04) โ€” Old Quarter junction, a river of motorbikes. Selfie, stepping out between the bikes. She swings the phone to her face while a stream of helmets and conical hats flows behind her, horns overlapping. Overcast daylight, deep focus. Dialogue: "์ด๊ฑธ ์–ด๋–ป๊ฒŒ ๊ฑด๋„ˆ?" Transition: Fast cut on beat (0:04โ€“0:06) โ€” Street cafรฉ. Selfie, arm short. She pushes a glass with condensed milk settled at the bottom toward the lens until it fills half the frame, eyebrows raised. Low backless stools, a stained yellow French wall behind. Transition: Snap cut (0:06โ€“0:08) โ€” Alley bรกnh mรฌ cart. Insert, phone pointed down at her hands. A baguette split over the charcoal is handed to her in newspaper and she peels the paper down with her fingertips. Steam rises and a few sprigs of coriander stick out of the split. White tube light on the cart, a parked motorbike beside it. Transition: Cut on natural movement (0:08โ€“0:09.75) โ€” Huc Bridge reveal. She raises the phone from her face and tilts it up until the red wooden bridge crossing the lake fills the frame. Natural daylight, sky blown out behind a banyan tree. Her mouth opens slightly. Transition: Soft cut mid-upward motion (0:09.75โ€“0:12) โ€” Train Street cafรฉ. Selfie. On a low stool beside the track she is holding a coffee glass in both hands; hearing it come she sets the glass down and pulls her stool back against the wall. She looks at the lens, then sideways, and her face collapses into a laugh as a train comes out of the far end of the lane and passes an arm's length away. Dialogue: "ํ— ์ง„์งœ ์˜จ๋‹ทใ…‹ใ…‹ใ…‹ใ…‹" Transition: Cut on the end of the laugh (0:12โ€“0:13.75) โ€” Old Quarter, the 36 streets. Follow from behind, phone low. She shoulders through the packed lane with the bรกnh mรฌ, finishes the last piece and folds the newspaper away. Unlit lanterns and signs stacked tight overhead, people pushing past. Overcast afternoon light. Transition: Cut on forward movement (0:13.75โ€“0:15.5) โ€” Back seat of a cyclo. Her hands are empty now โ€” the phone low at knee height in one hand, the rail in the other. The street slides past under the folded canopy, the driver's back swaying in front. She looks out, not at the lens. The music drops a beat, leaving only wheels and horns. Transition: Snap cut (0:15.5โ€“0:18) โ€” PhแปŸ shop. From here the image is camcorder: blooming tape, light noise, late focus. The camera is fixed at eye level across the counter, no phone or camera visible in frame. Medium. She sits down on a low blue stool under a hand-painted PhแปŸ sign. The owner sets a steaming bowl of beef phแปŸ down โ€” thin-sliced beef, rice noodles, spring onion, a side plate of sprouts and basil. Dialogue: "์Œ€๊ตญ์ˆ˜! ์ด๊ฑฐ ๋จน์œผ๋Ÿฌ ์™”์–ด~" Transition: Cut on the bowl landing (0:18โ€“0:20) โ€” Lifting the noodles. Macro, phone lowered to the bowl, shallow focus. She draws rice noodles up out of the clear broth with her chopsticks, steam climbing. The steam crosses the lens and one side of the frame hazes over and clears. Only the broth and the slurping at the next stool. Transition: Cut with the noodles still raised (0:20โ€“0:22) โ€” First mouthful. Selfie, handheld. She pulls in a big mouthful, closes her eyes and opens them. Her shoulders drop and she nods once at the lens. Just after sundown, the white fluorescent light of the shop. Dialogue: "๋ฏธ์ณค๋‹ค ์ง„์งœ." Transition: Cut where her face softens (0:22โ€“0:23.5) โ€” The broth. Selfie, close. She lifts the bowl in both hands, tips it back, sets it down and lets out a breath. The lens fogs with steam. Sound only. Transition: Cut back to phone image quality (0:23.5โ€“0:27) โ€” Tแบก Hiแป‡n beer street โ˜…signature. She steps into the narrow lane on an extended-arm selfie, walking between the rows of low plastic stools set out on the ground, and slowly lifts her head. Red, yellow and green lanterns hung low across the lane slide over her face and the same colours bleed across the wet ground. Rack focus โ€” her face sharp, the signs behind spreading. Practical light only, no glow. 60% slow motion. Transition: Soft cut with her head still up (0:27โ€“0:30) โ€” Long Biรชn Bridge, night reveal. Close selfie โ†’ arm extends โ†’ the river and the Hanoi night open up below. Wind pushes her bangs across her eyes once. Natural night phone exposure. Dialogue: "๊ทธ๋Ÿผ ๋ชจ๋‘ tแบกm biแป‡t~!" She waves broadly at the camera and that same hand covers the lens as the frame goes dark. AUDIO: real location sound over the music. Unbroken motorbike horns and engines, stools scraping the pavement, charcoal sizzling, a train horn and rails, cyclo wheels, broth boiling and chopsticks, slurping at the next stool, night street noise, wind. Her muttering is natural Korean. CONSISTENCY: the same face, the same hair and the same clothes in every shot. Hands and chopsticks are natural with no smeared fingers. No text, no subtitles, no logo and no watermark on screen. No filming equipment is visible in frame. FINALLY: this has to look like footage a real person shot on a phone. Nothing about the face, the skin or the movement should read as AI-generated. Every line of dialogue is enunciated clearly, syllable by syllable โ€” no slurring, no swallowed syllables, no clipped word endings, and the tense consonants and final consonants of Korean are pronounced accurately. Expressions and gestures are not performed; they are what the moment would naturally produce.

MagicAI

22,071 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 13 Tagen

"What NewJeans Wanted to Say" [Full transcript translated to English] ๐Ÿน: Some of you might be surprised by this sudden meeting, but we wanted to share our thoughts and opinions about the recent events, so we prepared this session. First, I want to explain one of the reasons we decided to do this live. It's been hard to see many people who have worked with us continue to suffer from unfair demands and pressure even after our CEO was dismissed. It was frustrating to just stand by and watch these situations unfold, and we were very worried about our future as a group of five. Honestly, while preparing for this live, we were naturally concerned about the reactions we might receive afterward. We were also worried that people might mistakenly think that our CEO instructed us to do this, but I want to clarify that this live was prepared because we five members genuinely wanted to express our thoughts. We received help from directors we trust for things we couldn't prepare ourselves, like setting up the shoot and finding a location. It didnโ€™t feel right for us to stay silent when everyone, including our Bunnies, has been stepping up to support us. Moreover, this is not just a matter of leaving it to the adults because it directly affects the lives of us five members. Since we're the ones going through this, we felt that it would be healthier to speak up ourselves than to do nothing, so we mustered the courage to do so. The main point of what we want to say today is directed towards HYBE. We've already had meetings with the current management to express our opinions, but after seeing what happened afterward, it feels like our concerns weren't clearly conveyed. It seemed like communication was blocked, so we felt that preparing this live was the only way to properly share our thoughts and feelings. ๐Ÿป: Iโ€™m sure that todayโ€™s announcement has shocked many of the staff as well, as they were not aware of it, and I imagine everyone watching is quite surprised too. Weโ€™ve thought a lot about where to begin, but since the purpose is to express our intentions, weโ€™ll try to explain as clearly as possible. Of course, due to contractual issues, we canโ€™t share everything, but weโ€™ll be as honest as we can. After it was decided that we would debut as NewJeans, our members spent a lot of time getting to know Min Heejin Daepyonim, both as a group and individually. At first, I had reservations and a certain fear towards the adults we were working with, but Daepyonim was the first person to approach us in a way that allowed us to open up, which was initially awkward but eventually built trust. From before our debut until now, weโ€™ve been aware of various issues related to our debut schedule and other matters. However, working with Daepyonim made us feel good, and I believe thatโ€™s why we were able to debut successfully and continue our activities until now. This has been todayโ€™s news story. ๐Ÿถ: Naturally, we all want to continue working with Daepyonim. Even before debuting as NewJeans and through all of the time that we spent together with Min Heejin Daepyonim, all of us felt that the music we wanted to make and the kind of world we wanted to build together, our vision, was similar in so many ways. With Min Heejin Daepyonim, we were able to prepare each and every task with sincere hearts, and I believe it shows in our work. Putting our sincere effort into something is only possible because of the people that we're working with have trust in each other and have that same vision. Min Heejin Daepyonim is not only the person that produces our music, but someone who makes NewJeans who we are. She discusses even the smallest details with us and explains them in ways that we can understand clearly. NewJeans has a distinct colour and tone, and this was created with Min Heejin Daepyonim. She is integral to NewJeansโ€™ identity, and we all feel that she is irreplaceable. ๐Ÿฑ: However, even after our debut, there have been many unfair and incomprehensible incidents that you might not know about, and these incidents have only increased over time. As some of you may know, recently, videos from our trainee days and private records, such as medical information, were leaked. When I first saw that, I was really shocked. It was hard to understand how our company, which is supposed to protect us, failed to manage and allowed such information to be leaked. Naturally, this situation has made us worry that other strange or false information about us might spread in the future. Although we, along with our parents and Min Heejin Daepyonim, have raised concerns about this to HYBE, they havenโ€™t resolved the issue, nor have they taken any proactive measures. Then, in the midst of all this, our CEO was dismissed, and weโ€™re left wondering whom we can trust and rely on. Weโ€™ve come to the conclusion that if we donโ€™t speak out about this now, no one will know what weโ€™re going through. After much discussion among ourselves, we finally decided to take this step. ๐Ÿฐ: Something happened to me recently. The 4th floor of the HYBE building is where we get our hair and makeup done, so a lot of other artists and staff come and go there. One day, I was waiting alone in the hallway, and some staff from another team passed by. We greeted each other, but when they came back out a bit later, I heard one of their managers say, โ€œIgnore her,โ€ right in front of me. I could hear and see everything clearly. Even now, I still donโ€™t understand why I had to go through that. ๐Ÿป: When I heard about what Hanni experienced, I was really shocked. How could a manager from another team tell their members to ignore one of us, and say it so loudly that Hanni could hear it? Such unimaginable words and behavior were directed at us, yet there was no apology, nor did they even acknowledge their wrongdoing. Of course, Iโ€™m worried about our future, but whatโ€™s most frightening is that the work weโ€™ve already created is being compromised. Seeing the people who have poured their lives into creating our work being treated this way makes it hard to understand how this could be happening. The new management said they would separate producing and management, but weโ€™ve always worked differently from other labels, and we thought that our way was a good one. Now, Daepyonim can no longer approve all matters, and weโ€™re left wondering how weโ€™re supposed to continue working as we did before. The recent statement from the new management also didnโ€™t make sense to me. If they really didnโ€™t intend to interfere with our producing, then the recent incident with Director Shin Woo-seok should never have happened, and it should have been handled differently. We are the ones directly involved with the copyrights and likeness rights of our content, yet theyโ€™re making decisions without our consent. In their statement, they kept saying they were acting to protect us and prevent our anxiety, but why do they keep insisting on this when they havenโ€™t considered our wishes? We donโ€™t want any more unnecessary issues to arise, and we want them to show respect and consideration for Daepyonim and all the directors who have worked with us. The things theyโ€™re doing right now are not in our best interest at all. ๐Ÿฐ: Something we all find very important, something that plays a very important role in our team's colour and image is our media content and creative production. Despite saying that they would leave all the creative production to our now former CEO, Min Heejin, through official statements that I think a lot of you might have already read or seen, and also during our personal meetings, they infringed our content. Content that not only we worked really hard on, but also our staff who spent endless hours to produce and release them solely for our fans. And if they had any understanding about what type of team we are, and the type of content that we create, they would have thought more deeply for crossing the line that they set for themselves. Because of this incident, we realized that there's not much we can do to prevent these type of issues. Personally, the way that ADOR used to run was the business management and creative production was not separated and was factors that played and worked in harmony with each other. That's how it worked and it was perfectly fine. It was our way of working and it was our CEO's way of producing NewJeans' content, which a lot of you were able to enjoy and appreciate. But now that she's no longer CEO, these factors that should have continued to work together in harmony are now being seen as two different areas of work. ๐Ÿป: Besides this, there are many other incidents weโ€™ve experienced that are beyond my understandingโ€”things that are frightening and uncomfortable. These incidents naturally make us question whether HYBE really cares about NewJeans, and there are clear signs of this. However, itโ€™s hard to discuss everything today because weโ€™re not sure how far things could escalate. We just hope you can understand a little of whatโ€™s been on our minds and why we chose to speak out in this way. ๐Ÿถ: As I mentioned earlier, our dream was to perform the music we want to make with Daepyonim, and we were working very hard toward that goal. But now, we canโ€™t do that, and the plans weโ€™ve made might not come to fruition. As Hanni unnie said earlier, just like that, the content that we released solely for our fans, for our bunnies, was instantly erased. And I truly can't understand why anyone would do this to a group, or just anyone in general. We were just working hard for the present, so what did we do wrong? A week after Daepyonim was dismissed, we found out that we could no longer work with the director weโ€™ve been working with all this time, and weโ€™re extremely anxious because we donโ€™t know what will happen to the staff who have always worked hard for us. If they really care about us, they should stop saying that they prioritize the artists and instead let us do the music we love in an environment where we can be genuinely happy. Is that really so hard to do? Itโ€™s hard to fully express whatโ€™s in my heart, but in the end, the five of us just want to continue our activities with Min Heejin Daepyonim, as we have done so far. ๐Ÿฑ: Personally, I want to continue working with the people around us who have helped me grow mentally and made me feel alive. However, I can't understand, nor do I think I should have to understand, why external forces are constantly obstructing and hindering us. I absolutely cannot comprehend what is truly in our best interest or what is supposed to help us grow. And I feel so sorry and heartbroken that our Bunnies, who found comfort in us and shared joyful memories with us, have to go through this ordeal and worry about things they shouldn't have to. We almost lost the work that symbolizes the relationship between NewJeans and Bunnies, and we don't want to lose anything else. I refuse to conform to or follow the values of the society those people belong to, and because I believe that direction is not the right one, I will not choose to go that way. ๐Ÿน: We found out about the CEO's dismissal through the news on the very day it happened. It was so sudden and unimaginable for all of us, and honestly, it was really difficult for us to process. As artists under HYBE, the company's unilateral notification made it clear to us that they don't respect us at all. In the midst of this confusion, we heard through our manager that the new CEO wanted to meet with us. From the very first action taken by the newly appointed Juyoung, it was clear that there was no consideration for us. He claimed to care for us, to prioritize NewJeans, but looking at everything that has happened, it's evident that his words were just thatโ€”empty words. HYBEโ€™s actions, like publishing articles that painted us in a bad light just a week before our comeback, make us question how any of this is supposed to be in our best interest. ๐Ÿป: It's already been half a year of unnecessary and exhausting discussions about us and NewJeans, and even as a third party, it must be tiring. As the ones directly involved, itโ€™s incredibly uncomfortable for us. We still have music we want to make and goals we want to achieve together, but as things stand now, itโ€™s heartbreaking to think that we might lose not only the work weโ€™ve created so far but also the identity of our team. Thatโ€™s what makes us feel so helpless. We held this live stream to express our feelings because we sincerely want this tiresome conflict to end. ๐Ÿฐ: Like how we have our own and individual thoughts and feelings, we have the choice to choose how we will react to each situation, and we are not going to follow Hybe's every order blindly. We are more than well aware that this is getting in the way of our work, and that we should be treated much, much better than how we are right now. And it's very hard to believe that they are truly sincere about wanting to help us continue, to be able to continue to work with our Daepyonim, Min Heejin Daepyonim. Despite her being in the midst of all this current legal conflict, she's expected to plan and creatively produce our future endeavours in just only two months, which I personally think makes no sense at all. We don't want to hear all the empty words of how they're going to help us continue to work with Min Heejin, Daepyonim. And all we want is this legal conflict to be resolved and have our working environment returned back to normal the way it was before. ๐Ÿน: The way HYBE is operating right now feels dishonest and wrong to us. Please, stop interfering. Reinstating our CEO and returning us to the original ADOR environment we had before, with familiar people, not strangers, would make things right. Weโ€™re not asking for special treatment; we just want everyone to do their jobs well in their respective places. Weโ€™ll do our best in our roles too. We sincerely hope our request is heard. ๐Ÿถ: From a human perspective, I hope you stop harassing our CEO, Min Hee Jin. Honestly, she seems so pitiful, and HYBE just comes across as an inhumane company. What can we possibly learn from a company like this? So, I really hope you stop bothering our CEO. ๐Ÿป: What we want is the original ADOR, where CEO Min Hee Jin leads both management and production. The reason we're making this request is because it's a way to coexist peacefully without conflict with HYBE. If our message has been conveyed properly, we hope Chairman Bang and HYBE make a wise decision to restore ADOR to its original state by the 25th. Thank you for listening to us. #ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ์–ด๋„์–ด_๋‰ด์ง„์Šค์ง€์šฐ๊ธฐ_์ž‘์ž‘ํ•ด #HYBE_STOP_SABOTAGING_NEWJEANS #HYBEใซใ‚ˆใ‚‹NewJeansใธใฎๅฆจๅฎณใซๆŠ—่ญฐใ—ใพใ™ #NEWJEANS_NEVER_DIE
27:11

"What NewJeans Wanted to Say" [Full transcript translated to English] ๐Ÿน: Some of you might be surprised by this sudden meeting, but we wanted to share our thoughts and opinions about the recent events, so we prepared this session. First, I want to explain one of the reasons we decided to do this live. It's been hard to see many people who have worked with us continue to suffer from unfair demands and pressure even after our CEO was dismissed. It was frustrating to just stand by and watch these situations unfold, and we were very worried about our future as a group of five. Honestly, while preparing for this live, we were naturally concerned about the reactions we might receive afterward. We were also worried that people might mistakenly think that our CEO instructed us to do this, but I want to clarify that this live was prepared because we five members genuinely wanted to express our thoughts. We received help from directors we trust for things we couldn't prepare ourselves, like setting up the shoot and finding a location. It didnโ€™t feel right for us to stay silent when everyone, including our Bunnies, has been stepping up to support us. Moreover, this is not just a matter of leaving it to the adults because it directly affects the lives of us five members. Since we're the ones going through this, we felt that it would be healthier to speak up ourselves than to do nothing, so we mustered the courage to do so. The main point of what we want to say today is directed towards HYBE. We've already had meetings with the current management to express our opinions, but after seeing what happened afterward, it feels like our concerns weren't clearly conveyed. It seemed like communication was blocked, so we felt that preparing this live was the only way to properly share our thoughts and feelings. ๐Ÿป: Iโ€™m sure that todayโ€™s announcement has shocked many of the staff as well, as they were not aware of it, and I imagine everyone watching is quite surprised too. Weโ€™ve thought a lot about where to begin, but since the purpose is to express our intentions, weโ€™ll try to explain as clearly as possible. Of course, due to contractual issues, we canโ€™t share everything, but weโ€™ll be as honest as we can. After it was decided that we would debut as NewJeans, our members spent a lot of time getting to know Min Heejin Daepyonim, both as a group and individually. At first, I had reservations and a certain fear towards the adults we were working with, but Daepyonim was the first person to approach us in a way that allowed us to open up, which was initially awkward but eventually built trust. From before our debut until now, weโ€™ve been aware of various issues related to our debut schedule and other matters. However, working with Daepyonim made us feel good, and I believe thatโ€™s why we were able to debut successfully and continue our activities until now. This has been todayโ€™s news story. ๐Ÿถ: Naturally, we all want to continue working with Daepyonim. Even before debuting as NewJeans and through all of the time that we spent together with Min Heejin Daepyonim, all of us felt that the music we wanted to make and the kind of world we wanted to build together, our vision, was similar in so many ways. With Min Heejin Daepyonim, we were able to prepare each and every task with sincere hearts, and I believe it shows in our work. Putting our sincere effort into something is only possible because of the people that we're working with have trust in each other and have that same vision. Min Heejin Daepyonim is not only the person that produces our music, but someone who makes NewJeans who we are. She discusses even the smallest details with us and explains them in ways that we can understand clearly. NewJeans has a distinct colour and tone, and this was created with Min Heejin Daepyonim. She is integral to NewJeansโ€™ identity, and we all feel that she is irreplaceable. ๐Ÿฑ: However, even after our debut, there have been many unfair and incomprehensible incidents that you might not know about, and these incidents have only increased over time. As some of you may know, recently, videos from our trainee days and private records, such as medical information, were leaked. When I first saw that, I was really shocked. It was hard to understand how our company, which is supposed to protect us, failed to manage and allowed such information to be leaked. Naturally, this situation has made us worry that other strange or false information about us might spread in the future. Although we, along with our parents and Min Heejin Daepyonim, have raised concerns about this to HYBE, they havenโ€™t resolved the issue, nor have they taken any proactive measures. Then, in the midst of all this, our CEO was dismissed, and weโ€™re left wondering whom we can trust and rely on. Weโ€™ve come to the conclusion that if we donโ€™t speak out about this now, no one will know what weโ€™re going through. After much discussion among ourselves, we finally decided to take this step. ๐Ÿฐ: Something happened to me recently. The 4th floor of the HYBE building is where we get our hair and makeup done, so a lot of other artists and staff come and go there. One day, I was waiting alone in the hallway, and some staff from another team passed by. We greeted each other, but when they came back out a bit later, I heard one of their managers say, โ€œIgnore her,โ€ right in front of me. I could hear and see everything clearly. Even now, I still donโ€™t understand why I had to go through that. ๐Ÿป: When I heard about what Hanni experienced, I was really shocked. How could a manager from another team tell their members to ignore one of us, and say it so loudly that Hanni could hear it? Such unimaginable words and behavior were directed at us, yet there was no apology, nor did they even acknowledge their wrongdoing. Of course, Iโ€™m worried about our future, but whatโ€™s most frightening is that the work weโ€™ve already created is being compromised. Seeing the people who have poured their lives into creating our work being treated this way makes it hard to understand how this could be happening. The new management said they would separate producing and management, but weโ€™ve always worked differently from other labels, and we thought that our way was a good one. Now, Daepyonim can no longer approve all matters, and weโ€™re left wondering how weโ€™re supposed to continue working as we did before. The recent statement from the new management also didnโ€™t make sense to me. If they really didnโ€™t intend to interfere with our producing, then the recent incident with Director Shin Woo-seok should never have happened, and it should have been handled differently. We are the ones directly involved with the copyrights and likeness rights of our content, yet theyโ€™re making decisions without our consent. In their statement, they kept saying they were acting to protect us and prevent our anxiety, but why do they keep insisting on this when they havenโ€™t considered our wishes? We donโ€™t want any more unnecessary issues to arise, and we want them to show respect and consideration for Daepyonim and all the directors who have worked with us. The things theyโ€™re doing right now are not in our best interest at all. ๐Ÿฐ: Something we all find very important, something that plays a very important role in our team's colour and image is our media content and creative production. Despite saying that they would leave all the creative production to our now former CEO, Min Heejin, through official statements that I think a lot of you might have already read or seen, and also during our personal meetings, they infringed our content. Content that not only we worked really hard on, but also our staff who spent endless hours to produce and release them solely for our fans. And if they had any understanding about what type of team we are, and the type of content that we create, they would have thought more deeply for crossing the line that they set for themselves. Because of this incident, we realized that there's not much we can do to prevent these type of issues. Personally, the way that ADOR used to run was the business management and creative production was not separated and was factors that played and worked in harmony with each other. That's how it worked and it was perfectly fine. It was our way of working and it was our CEO's way of producing NewJeans' content, which a lot of you were able to enjoy and appreciate. But now that she's no longer CEO, these factors that should have continued to work together in harmony are now being seen as two different areas of work. ๐Ÿป: Besides this, there are many other incidents weโ€™ve experienced that are beyond my understandingโ€”things that are frightening and uncomfortable. These incidents naturally make us question whether HYBE really cares about NewJeans, and there are clear signs of this. However, itโ€™s hard to discuss everything today because weโ€™re not sure how far things could escalate. We just hope you can understand a little of whatโ€™s been on our minds and why we chose to speak out in this way. ๐Ÿถ: As I mentioned earlier, our dream was to perform the music we want to make with Daepyonim, and we were working very hard toward that goal. But now, we canโ€™t do that, and the plans weโ€™ve made might not come to fruition. As Hanni unnie said earlier, just like that, the content that we released solely for our fans, for our bunnies, was instantly erased. And I truly can't understand why anyone would do this to a group, or just anyone in general. We were just working hard for the present, so what did we do wrong? A week after Daepyonim was dismissed, we found out that we could no longer work with the director weโ€™ve been working with all this time, and weโ€™re extremely anxious because we donโ€™t know what will happen to the staff who have always worked hard for us. If they really care about us, they should stop saying that they prioritize the artists and instead let us do the music we love in an environment where we can be genuinely happy. Is that really so hard to do? Itโ€™s hard to fully express whatโ€™s in my heart, but in the end, the five of us just want to continue our activities with Min Heejin Daepyonim, as we have done so far. ๐Ÿฑ: Personally, I want to continue working with the people around us who have helped me grow mentally and made me feel alive. However, I can't understand, nor do I think I should have to understand, why external forces are constantly obstructing and hindering us. I absolutely cannot comprehend what is truly in our best interest or what is supposed to help us grow. And I feel so sorry and heartbroken that our Bunnies, who found comfort in us and shared joyful memories with us, have to go through this ordeal and worry about things they shouldn't have to. We almost lost the work that symbolizes the relationship between NewJeans and Bunnies, and we don't want to lose anything else. I refuse to conform to or follow the values of the society those people belong to, and because I believe that direction is not the right one, I will not choose to go that way. ๐Ÿน: We found out about the CEO's dismissal through the news on the very day it happened. It was so sudden and unimaginable for all of us, and honestly, it was really difficult for us to process. As artists under HYBE, the company's unilateral notification made it clear to us that they don't respect us at all. In the midst of this confusion, we heard through our manager that the new CEO wanted to meet with us. From the very first action taken by the newly appointed Juyoung, it was clear that there was no consideration for us. He claimed to care for us, to prioritize NewJeans, but looking at everything that has happened, it's evident that his words were just thatโ€”empty words. HYBEโ€™s actions, like publishing articles that painted us in a bad light just a week before our comeback, make us question how any of this is supposed to be in our best interest. ๐Ÿป: It's already been half a year of unnecessary and exhausting discussions about us and NewJeans, and even as a third party, it must be tiring. As the ones directly involved, itโ€™s incredibly uncomfortable for us. We still have music we want to make and goals we want to achieve together, but as things stand now, itโ€™s heartbreaking to think that we might lose not only the work weโ€™ve created so far but also the identity of our team. Thatโ€™s what makes us feel so helpless. We held this live stream to express our feelings because we sincerely want this tiresome conflict to end. ๐Ÿฐ: Like how we have our own and individual thoughts and feelings, we have the choice to choose how we will react to each situation, and we are not going to follow Hybe's every order blindly. We are more than well aware that this is getting in the way of our work, and that we should be treated much, much better than how we are right now. And it's very hard to believe that they are truly sincere about wanting to help us continue, to be able to continue to work with our Daepyonim, Min Heejin Daepyonim. Despite her being in the midst of all this current legal conflict, she's expected to plan and creatively produce our future endeavours in just only two months, which I personally think makes no sense at all. We don't want to hear all the empty words of how they're going to help us continue to work with Min Heejin, Daepyonim. And all we want is this legal conflict to be resolved and have our working environment returned back to normal the way it was before. ๐Ÿน: The way HYBE is operating right now feels dishonest and wrong to us. Please, stop interfering. Reinstating our CEO and returning us to the original ADOR environment we had before, with familiar people, not strangers, would make things right. Weโ€™re not asking for special treatment; we just want everyone to do their jobs well in their respective places. Weโ€™ll do our best in our roles too. We sincerely hope our request is heard. ๐Ÿถ: From a human perspective, I hope you stop harassing our CEO, Min Hee Jin. Honestly, she seems so pitiful, and HYBE just comes across as an inhumane company. What can we possibly learn from a company like this? So, I really hope you stop bothering our CEO. ๐Ÿป: What we want is the original ADOR, where CEO Min Hee Jin leads both management and production. The reason we're making this request is because it's a way to coexist peacefully without conflict with HYBE. If our message has been conveyed properly, we hope Chairman Bang and HYBE make a wise decision to restore ADOR to its original state by the 25th. Thank you for listening to us. #ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ์–ด๋„์–ด_๋‰ด์ง„์Šค์ง€์šฐ๊ธฐ_์ž‘์ž‘ํ•ด #HYBE_STOP_SABOTAGING_NEWJEANS #HYBEใซใ‚ˆใ‚‹NewJeansใธใฎๅฆจๅฎณใซๆŠ—่ญฐใ—ใพใ™ #NEWJEANS_NEVER_DIE

1tokki

3,760,388 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

Technically is dead; long live Technically Some bittersweet news for you all today: after 5 years writing Technically and more than 100 posts about everything from APIs to data warehouses to Facebook DNS hacks, today I am (for the most part) shutting the Technically Substack downโ€ฆ โ€ฆand replacing it with Technically 2.0, an amazing software product Iโ€™ve been working with David Krevitt on for the past 6 months. But firstโ€ฆ For a newsletter that started with an innocent tweet while I was bored in Haneda airport, this thing has come pretty far. 70K+ subscribers, yada yada. But youโ€™re here for the story so here it is. It was December 2019, I was traveling before moving to SF to start at Retool, and like I said, I was bored. Late 2019 โ€“ what an amazing time to start a newsletter! There werenโ€™t that many of them out there. And then came 2020. Everyone was stuck at home with nothing to do but sign up for more and more Substacks, and talk about them on the internet. Every day, another one of your friends was announcing a newsletter on Twitter. It was the golden era, no doubt, and many people like me combined hard work, a good idea, and the old fashioned โ€œright place right timeโ€ streak of luck to build a really nice Substack business. Iโ€™ll never forget the day Ben Thompson referenced Technically in Stratechery. I must have gotten 50 texts from friends. Everyone was reading Stratechery at the timeโ€ฆit was like becoming a made man. There was this almost communal vibe in the air with these newsletters. Everyone was reading the same stuff, talking about the same stuff. It was a scene is what it was. But by 2022 things were changing. People were outside again, and had less free time to read newsletters. Interest rates were going up, and people were working more (even in offices). In the paid Substack group chats, most of us were reporting stalling or negative growth, even though we hadnโ€™t changed anything on our end. And with 50% churn rates on these subscriptions, if you werenโ€™t growing you were dying. Iโ€™m listening to Neil Youngโ€™s โ€œAfter the Gold Rushโ€ as I write this and it couldnโ€™t be more fitting. Although I imagine Mr. Young himself would disapprove of the whole paid newsletter endeavor. What happened to newsletters? David and I call whatโ€™s going on โ€œSubstack Fatigueโ€ โ€“ people are just tired of reading yet another newsletter, let alone paying for one. Newsletters are just not the thing anymore. There are some fast growing news ones focused on AI, but the same story is going to play out in a few years when everything cools down. Political newsletters are fully investing in video and podcasts. Newsletters are not the thing anymore. We rode a cultural wave and the wave is over. You donโ€™t have to die, but you have to adjust. The wrench in this whole story is that Technically was only (very) part time for me. Iโ€™m pretty sure at one point I was generating the most revenue on Substack for someone who wasnโ€™t focusing on their newsletter full time. Which is a sick flex no doubt, but was also a huge problem, because I just didnโ€™t have the time or mental capacity to make the big moves required to reverse the trend. Technically started to slowly lose paid subscribers every month, but I was at peace with that. I was entering a new phase in my life, settling down a bit, enjoying spending time on cooking, cocktails, and music. Approaching 30 and feeling really good about everything. Itโ€™s OK for some things to be temporary, and I was content with Technically to continue to be useful to peopleโ€ฆjust not make as much money. But in the back of my head, I always knew that Technically had a lot more potential, and deserved more than I could give it. That thereโ€™s no reason this thing couldnโ€™t be a $1M+/year business. I continue to believe that technical literacy is going to be one of the defining social problems of our era, and the progress in AI only makes this even more critical. It should be way more than a newsletter, it should be how everyone learns what the fuck is going on in this digital world. I needed some help. But I had a bad track record of getting people to work on Technically with me. Itโ€™s hard to share custody of your child. And I am extremely particular. Iโ€™m not always the easiest to work with. Worked with some contractors here and there, but never found a more long term partner. Iโ€™m extremely grateful that David Krevitt reached out to me when he did or this paragraph would end here. Instead, after regaling you with my boring tale for many paragraphs now, I can finally share what weโ€™ve been working on since last year. Itโ€™s called Technically 2.0. Itโ€™s all of the content you know and love, but built as a piece of software specifically aimed at helping people get more technical. No more newsletter โ€“ itโ€™s a learning platform now, complete with reading lists, bookmarks, a dictionary, and guided learning tracks. Our goal was to make a Wikipedia kind of experience: click around to follow your curiosity on whatever software youโ€™re learning about. You can sign up on the Technically site ( Youโ€™re going to have to pay for it, but if your experience is anything like that of the other thousands of people who already have, you wonโ€™t regret it. Enjoy the soothing sounds of David's voice as he walks you through it in the video below. Itโ€™s hard to say goodbye completely to something youโ€™ve been doing every week for 5 years. Any readers with their own long running newsletters will understand the odd, para-social relationship you develop with your audience. So Iโ€™m going to keep publishing on Substack a little โ€“ monthly roundups of the new stuff weโ€™re publishing on Technically 2.0, plus some good sponsored posts. So while the newsletter might be dead, it is also only just beginning (or something). Hope to see you on the other side, ~ โค๏ธ Justin
1:14

Technically is dead; long live Technically Some bittersweet news for you all today: after 5 years writing Technically and more than 100 posts about everything from APIs to data warehouses to Facebook DNS hacks, today I am (for the most part) shutting the Technically Substack downโ€ฆ โ€ฆand replacing it with Technically 2.0, an amazing software product Iโ€™ve been working with David Krevitt on for the past 6 months. But firstโ€ฆ For a newsletter that started with an innocent tweet while I was bored in Haneda airport, this thing has come pretty far. 70K+ subscribers, yada yada. But youโ€™re here for the story so here it is. It was December 2019, I was traveling before moving to SF to start at Retool, and like I said, I was bored. Late 2019 โ€“ what an amazing time to start a newsletter! There werenโ€™t that many of them out there. And then came 2020. Everyone was stuck at home with nothing to do but sign up for more and more Substacks, and talk about them on the internet. Every day, another one of your friends was announcing a newsletter on Twitter. It was the golden era, no doubt, and many people like me combined hard work, a good idea, and the old fashioned โ€œright place right timeโ€ streak of luck to build a really nice Substack business. Iโ€™ll never forget the day Ben Thompson referenced Technically in Stratechery. I must have gotten 50 texts from friends. Everyone was reading Stratechery at the timeโ€ฆit was like becoming a made man. There was this almost communal vibe in the air with these newsletters. Everyone was reading the same stuff, talking about the same stuff. It was a scene is what it was. But by 2022 things were changing. People were outside again, and had less free time to read newsletters. Interest rates were going up, and people were working more (even in offices). In the paid Substack group chats, most of us were reporting stalling or negative growth, even though we hadnโ€™t changed anything on our end. And with 50% churn rates on these subscriptions, if you werenโ€™t growing you were dying. Iโ€™m listening to Neil Youngโ€™s โ€œAfter the Gold Rushโ€ as I write this and it couldnโ€™t be more fitting. Although I imagine Mr. Young himself would disapprove of the whole paid newsletter endeavor. What happened to newsletters? David and I call whatโ€™s going on โ€œSubstack Fatigueโ€ โ€“ people are just tired of reading yet another newsletter, let alone paying for one. Newsletters are just not the thing anymore. There are some fast growing news ones focused on AI, but the same story is going to play out in a few years when everything cools down. Political newsletters are fully investing in video and podcasts. Newsletters are not the thing anymore. We rode a cultural wave and the wave is over. You donโ€™t have to die, but you have to adjust. The wrench in this whole story is that Technically was only (very) part time for me. Iโ€™m pretty sure at one point I was generating the most revenue on Substack for someone who wasnโ€™t focusing on their newsletter full time. Which is a sick flex no doubt, but was also a huge problem, because I just didnโ€™t have the time or mental capacity to make the big moves required to reverse the trend. Technically started to slowly lose paid subscribers every month, but I was at peace with that. I was entering a new phase in my life, settling down a bit, enjoying spending time on cooking, cocktails, and music. Approaching 30 and feeling really good about everything. Itโ€™s OK for some things to be temporary, and I was content with Technically to continue to be useful to peopleโ€ฆjust not make as much money. But in the back of my head, I always knew that Technically had a lot more potential, and deserved more than I could give it. That thereโ€™s no reason this thing couldnโ€™t be a $1M+/year business. I continue to believe that technical literacy is going to be one of the defining social problems of our era, and the progress in AI only makes this even more critical. It should be way more than a newsletter, it should be how everyone learns what the fuck is going on in this digital world. I needed some help. But I had a bad track record of getting people to work on Technically with me. Itโ€™s hard to share custody of your child. And I am extremely particular. Iโ€™m not always the easiest to work with. Worked with some contractors here and there, but never found a more long term partner. Iโ€™m extremely grateful that David Krevitt reached out to me when he did or this paragraph would end here. Instead, after regaling you with my boring tale for many paragraphs now, I can finally share what weโ€™ve been working on since last year. Itโ€™s called Technically 2.0. Itโ€™s all of the content you know and love, but built as a piece of software specifically aimed at helping people get more technical. No more newsletter โ€“ itโ€™s a learning platform now, complete with reading lists, bookmarks, a dictionary, and guided learning tracks. Our goal was to make a Wikipedia kind of experience: click around to follow your curiosity on whatever software youโ€™re learning about. You can sign up on the Technically site ( Youโ€™re going to have to pay for it, but if your experience is anything like that of the other thousands of people who already have, you wonโ€™t regret it. Enjoy the soothing sounds of David's voice as he walks you through it in the video below. Itโ€™s hard to say goodbye completely to something youโ€™ve been doing every week for 5 years. Any readers with their own long running newsletters will understand the odd, para-social relationship you develop with your audience. So Iโ€™m going to keep publishing on Substack a little โ€“ monthly roundups of the new stuff weโ€™re publishing on Technically 2.0, plus some good sponsored posts. So while the newsletter might be dead, it is also only just beginning (or something). Hope to see you on the other side, ~ โค๏ธ Justin

sisyphus bar and grill

29,390 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

(1/2) Last night's Aidan Kearney meltdown over his falling out with Karen Read on an X Space is the peak of catharsis and real-time online toxicity: It starts with the the bombshell claim about Aidan recorded Karen Read, moves to Karen's newly-released texts about being "done" with Aidan after "someone" sent a recording of that conversation to David Yannetti and Alan Jackson, then spirals into ad hominems, and ends with Kearney storming off to counter-publish. The flood of primary source documents posted on online overnight, thus, acts as the host's (Chris) victory lap over Kearney. FULL TRANSCRIPT; *(Cleaned for grammar/spelling, punctuated for flow, and line-broken for readability. Some errors are expected.)* **Aidan:** Am I on? **Host/Other:** You're on. **Aidan:** So who are you? Who is this? **Chris:** Don't worry about it. It doesn't matter who I am. **Aidan:** Well, it does. You're some fucking kangaroo court motherfucker talking about her. What the fuck do you know about anything? **Chris:** Well, I don't know exactly what you've been doing. **Aidan:** So what are your sources? What are your sources? What are your sources you're talking about? Huh? You don't know your sources? What do you talk about? No, your sources. Shut up. Let's see 'em. Let's see your sources. **Lily:** Hang on, Aidan. I'm the host. I'm Lily. **Aidan:** Yes, Lily. Hi, Lily. How are you? **Lily:** I'm good. I'm just going to wait. I know you may not know it, Chris, but you know me. And so I just wanted to say hi. **Aidan:** Yeah, I know, but this Koala motherfucker is up here making shit up, running his mouth nonsense. Let's see the receipts. I mean, what were you talking to Karen Read about? What are you talking about? Who the fuck are you? **Chris:** I'm asking you flat out: Did you or did you not record her phone calls between yourself and Karen? **Aidan:** I did not. I did not. **Chris:** Okay, so Karen is lying? **Aidan:** You talked to Karen Read? Karen isn't talking to anyone in the media, but she's talking to this call-the-motherfucker. That's what you're telling me right now. **Chris:** Like I said, If you want to go down this hill, stand ten toes down." **Aidan:** I'm calling you out because you're making shit up. **Chris:** Who? I'm not making anything up. I'm not making anything up. I'm not making anything up. **Aidan:** So let's see it. Let's see the fucking evidence. Let's see your communications with Karen Read where she says that. Let's see it. **Lily:** Hang on. Chris, you're going to have to provide the receipts. **Chris:** I'm going to tell you, the guy who's doing thisโ€”you know, he's going to put them out. **Chris:** Do you really want to prove it? You want to prove it to me? I've got all the mistakes that come out. I can't. Literally. Yeah. Yeah. Sure. What's that? Let's see it. Let's see it. Produce it. Tweet it out right now. **Aidan:** So I'm denying itโ€”like, hardcore, 100%. I'm the guy you have to deny it to. I don't, because you've become a bit of a fuck-up. It's about as fucking legitimate as Lindsey trying to be a rake. Let's fucking see it, motherfucker. You got it, right? 'Cause Iโ€”accusationsโ€”I always bring fucking receipts. Where's your receipt, bitch? **Aidan:** You got 'em? **Chris:** I've got 'em now. I think you want me to be sayingโ€”to be honestโ€”hang a room on the fucker with no receipt. **Aidan:** You got 'em? Yes or no? **Chris:** I've got a receipt. Where's your fuck? **Chris:** You just need, broโ€”you just need to like chill, because you're gonna have a lot of fucking neck on your face, because I don't really care. **Chris:** I said to the people who bought this story: If I end up having egg on my face, I'll put everyone's name in it, and I'm givenโ€”I have a... Just shut your fucking mouth for one fucking minute. **Aidan:** Right. Let's see it. **Chris:** I've just messaged the person. **Aidan:** Joe Flipp, you want to talk about a fucking psychopath? That motherfucker isโ€”just, Joe Flipp. Really want to fucking go there?" 'Cause it's Joe. You can just say it's Nick from Philadelphia, isn't it? Yeah, I know all about Nick from Philadelphia. If you fucking want to go there and the fucking hellโ€”that psychopathโ€”what Olivia Lambo went through. You just don't want to come out. Does he want to talk about all that? Does he want to launch? **Chris:** Okay? You know what? How was your lunch with Meredith the other week. Fuck it. I don't care. How was your lunch with Meredith? How's your lunch with Meredith? **Aidan:**What the fuck? **Chris:** Chat, what, what am I talking about? How is your lunch with Meredith here? We gotโ€”you know what you want to do? You want to carry on and be a fuck with me here? I like youโ€”always up. **Chris:** How was your lunch with Meredith a couple weeks ago, and what did you play for her? What the fuck are you talking about? Yeah, what the fuck am I talking about? You know exactly what I'm talking about. And I'm trying to do this respectfully, but you come in hot like you always do. So now I'm just gonna fucking do it. How was your lunch with Meredith the other week? **Aidan:** I didn't have one with Meredith. Yeah, bullshit. Okay, so that's it. So someone else is lying now. **Chris:** So you're gonna call Meredith a liar? Why? Meredith's a liar? **Aidan:** Are you talking to Meredith? **Chris:**I'm not talking to Meredith. **Aidan:** What are you talking about? **Chris:** Okay, well, so you have great Meredith in an Oscar. If you said that to Meredith, you just spread rumors. That's what you doโ€”you don't spread any rumors. I want to laugh tonight about this. **Erika Walsh:** I warned you, Chris, about this last night. **Aidan:** You got noโ€”Joe Flippโ€”fucking feeding you nonsense. That slimy psychopath, fucking nut job who called in Olivia's entire family to harass themโ€”to the point where she had the fucking... Nothing to do with Olivia. And Joe's Flippโ€” **Chris:* this is to do with you. Stop deflecting, that motherfucker. **Aidan:** I'm telling you thisโ€”he's the one telling you this. **Chris:** I've been told by three different people. Three different people. There's people in this chat who know about this. There's people in chatโ€”they won't stand up and say anything, but I know the people who know about this. **Aidan:** Bring all these lame cons up one by one so I can slam 'em down one by one, because none of you motherfuckers got a receipt to back up any of this shit. None of you do. Bring it. By adding them. **Chris:** Stand by. Stand by. Stand by. **Joe Flipperhead:** You have the text, bro. You know I saw the screenshot. **Aidan:** So we gonna talk about what you did to Olivia Lambo? We have a lot of things, dude. **Joe:** You're deflecting. When you... **Aidan:** You want to go there? Mark Bedderow? Oh, of being in on a fucking conspiracy against you? To tell usโ€”if when we told you Olivia Lambo... You made us fucking get on a FaceTime with her because you thought she was dead. You thought you were being catfished by her, fucking... I was, and so we agreed to do a Zoom call with her. And when I called you and I told you Olivia Lambo is realโ€”I just saw her face. What did you do? You accused me and Mark Bedderow of lying to you, of being in on it, because you are a fucking psychopathic motherfucker. And I didn't put it there because I don't want to fuck... **Joe:** Yeah, you did put it out there, though. If you want to get into the Olivia thing, that's fine, and I'll go down that road. But you're calling me a psychopath You fucking recorded Karen Read's fucking calls and sent them to people. **Chris:** I'm just gonna keep muting him because he's yelling. You can say it. **Aidan:** Is this Lily's space or yours? **Joe:** I have the text, dude. I'll put it on one of our... Yourโ€”She told me she's fucking done with you, dude. **Aidan:** All right. I'm going on my own right now. I'm calling out fucking Joe Flipp-ed life. If I get muted one more fucking time. I'm gonna do a whole fucking... Thank you. I'm publishing all your fucking textsโ€”the whole world can see what a fucking sadistic psychopath you are. You controlling predator piece of shit. You fucking go there. **Chris:** This is completely the actions of a normal innocent person. **Aidan:* You're a pyscho freak. **Joe:** Yeah, says the guy that recorded Karen. **Aidan:** Oh, yeah, let's hear it. See the fucking recording. Can I hear it? **Joe:** I got the text saying you recorded. But the text says there's a recording, so where's the fucking recording? *Aidan:** Hey, let's hear Joe. Why? I just got asked if I'mโ€”what would you say if I'm a massage in this? Like, goโ€” **Joe:** Why does Liv still text me to this day? **Aidan:** You text her. Oh, you want to see the receipts, dude? I've seen the receiptsโ€”all of them. Okay, I got all the receipts. **Joe:** You got the August ones, the September ones where she misses me and hates how things ended? You got those? Fuck, I see 'em. Publish 'em. I will do it. I don't planโ€”I talk about you. Go for it. **Chris:** You're doing everything back. **Joe:** When I told you how she wouldn't FaceTime me for three months, how she puts up month-old pictures if you wouldn't fucking... **Aidan:** Yeah, you know why? You know why she wouldn't do that? She's just not into you. Ever have you do this with every girl you fucking talk to? **Joe:**You said to me, after reading the text from her sisterโ€” **Chris:** Says the guy who is swining on a 19-year old. **Joe:** You said Aidan, that she said to you, "she's love with you," bro. That's what you said. She's in love with you. That's what you said. Yeah, when her sisterโ€”and then he can get you caught by somebody. Let's just get back to you. Deflection from Aidan, who doesn't want to be on the line. **Joe:** As you wishโ€”she wouldn't FaceTime me. She wouldn't meet up with me, and she lied to me constantly. Yeah, why would she meet up? **Aidan:** Maybe she's just not that into you. Ever think about that? Maybe she's just not that into you. Maybe you saw the text. I know, I knowโ€”it's hard for you to accept that the girl just doesn't want you. You have to accept the person doesn't want nothing to do with you, isn't it? I did, and you got clingy and possessive. And so she fucking stopped talking to you, so you called her mother and you talkedโ€”you don't even know because you're psychotic, bro. I'm fucking... you. *Joe:** You're just deflecting, bro. This is fucking pathetic. I'm not your one. She's talking about this. **Aidan:** I got no fucking thingโ€”youโ€”you are a fucking psychopath. **Joe:** You're first of allโ€”she doesn't want you to fucking be talking about this because why? **Aidan:** You're the one fucking airing it out now, motherfucker. **Chris:** You're the one airing it because you got caught recording Karen. **Aidan:** So let's hear the recording. Let's play the recording. You got a recording of me, right? **Joe:** I know you did it, dude. **Aidan:** What? **Joe:** I know you recorded. Are you lying? Karen Read's a liar? All right, am I...? **Aidan:** You are the fucking coward. Where's the recording? What recording you talking about? You'reโ€”you'reโ€” **Joe:** You're accusing Karen Read of lying about this? **Aidan:** Yes. **Joe:** You're reallyโ€”are you really serious? How many fuckingโ€”serious? **Aidan:** Let's hear the fucking recording. **Lily** Chris or Joe? Please play it. Did it? You didn't have... for people. Can you please provide a receipt? Just like I think it's fair. **Joe:** Aidan has it. **Aidan:: I thought you had it. I thought you had it. Let's hear it. Let's hear the recording. **Joe:** All right, you sent me the text that I sent. You haven't... **Aidan:** Yeah, let'sโ€”so let's hear the actual recording. Does it exist, though? **Joe:** So Karen is lying. **Aidan:: Karen Read would never lie (sarcastic tone). Oh, yeah. **Chris:** True color. *Joe:** So yeah, let me just run this: You recorded it. You recorded the conversation. You showed it to people, and then the very next day she randomly accused you of fucking doing it. That's what happened. That's what your story is, right? **Aidan:** There's no fucking recording. **Joe:** There is, dude. Where is it? **Aidan:** So let me hear it. Play it. **Joe:** I don't fucking have it. **Aidan:** Oh, you don't know if there's a recording, do you? Thank you. Because you're full of shit. I knowโ€”I just fucking caught you. That's what you just said. Thoseโ€”bring it up here. I talked to somebodyโ€”bring her up here. Bring Karen Read up here, bro. You talked to her? Bring her on up here. **Joe:** I spoke to somebody that you played the recording for. Okay, ohโ€”you know, justโ€”I just say I've already said it, so just say it. Okay, I said I wanted to not say her name, but you know whoโ€”you played it for. **Aidan:** I haven't played it for anyone justโ€” there's no recording. **Joe:** Stop fucking lying. Let's hear it from the point. *Aidan:** Let's hear it. Let's hear it. **Joe:** Aidan, this is fucking crazy, dude. **Aidan:** I'm not the one that fucking caught itโ€”got blocked by Olivia's mother, and fucking brother... **Joe** Here we go. This is deflecting, and dudeโ€”that's admitting how fucking guilty you are right here. **Aidan:** Let's hear a fucking recording. You said you got a fucking recording, right? **Joe:** Nobody said that. We saidโ€”oh, Karen Read doesn't want to talk to you anymore because you recorded her calls, set them to people, and it got back to her. **Chris:** I got a question for you, Aidan, I didn't knowโ€”so sure. When you went on your little pity party and then youโ€” **Joe:** The worst part is you lied to everybody acting on it. You had no idea what was wrong and why she she fucking set you straightโ€”trying to get sympathy. That, my friend, is fucking psychotic. **Aidan:** Okay, okay, sure thing. Yeah, you said I sent the recording out. Where's the recording? *Joe:** Dude? It's notโ€”I'm not obligated to fucking get the recording. **Aidan:** Oh, yeah, you wouldn't want to back it up, right? **Joe:** You're soโ€”you're going to go on record that Karen is lying? Say it. You're caling Karen Read a liar about this. **Aidan:** There is no fucking recording. **Joe:** You're lying, dude. It's fucking crazy. This is what's here. Itโ€”play the note. You played it for somebody. You got it. I don't got it. **Aidan:** Let's hear you play it. You're the one that says there's a fucking record. **Chris:** I mean, that'sโ€”you have a history of recording people. **Lily:** Wait, we haveโ€”well, I feel like we have a responsibility as me as a host to Chris and... You're bothโ€”you're actually both not providing a receipt, and I'mโ€”Aidan is actually asking for a receipt. I have toโ€”for the recording. **Joe and Chris** He hasโ€”asking for the recording. **Lily:** You guysโ€”she has which he sent toโ€”we know I said. So who has it? One of the receipts. I know you're not gonna haveโ€” **Aidan:: you don't have the recording becauseโ€” **Lily:** Just fucking say it. Karen doesn't want the recording out there. **Aidan:** What recording? There's no recording. **Joe:** Never even asked her for it, to be honest with you. **Aidan:** And so you waitโ€”yeah, you never asked. Thank youโ€”you never asked. **Joe:** Karen is fucking so done with you, bro. She sentโ€”she told me about this completely unsolicited. **Lily:**That's beside the point, and I'm not the firstโ€”(Joe) Karen's done with him, ..but what the fuckโ€”just post the fucking receipt for him. **Chris:** You can't come on here saying he has it, Lily. He's seen the same thing you've seen. He's even seen the same thing that I showed you. **Lily:** I know. You don't come on here and say I've got this, and then Aidan demands a receiptโ€”you deserve. Okay... **Joe:** He's deflecting, asking for a recording he knows about the text. **Lily:** Yeah, I know, Joe. I get what you're saying, and I respect everyโ€”like what you're saying, but he's denying it. **Joe:** Fine, I'll post the fuckโ€”I'll post them right now. I really don't give a fuck. **Lily:** Thank you. And that's immenseโ€”he canโ€”he can then riff like whatever he can. I can'tโ€”I'm so like nervous. I've got dry mouth because... Then Aidan can like look at those, and he at least hasโ€”you know exactly what's been spoken about. He's just denying it. I can't say that, and I get it, but he is asking for the receipt, which is fair. And **Joe:** I'll even add the text message when he came on here initially. He said it was all alive, right? He said he sent meโ€”fucking text message on Monday morning. **Lily:** I see it. We've established that now. We established that Aidan's denying it, so just post the receipt that you have, and then he can actually reflect on that andโ€”and do you see what I mean? He's not gonna turn around now and say actually it is true. But if you've got the receipt, he can then say, "I willโ€”this is x, y and z there." I just think it's fairโ€”like... **Aidan:** Now, yeah, what he has is a screenshot that he claims is from Karen Read. It wasโ€” **Joe:** You're saying it's not from Karen Read. **Aidan:** I don'tโ€”there's no fucking name on the top. **Joe:** Yeah, I have it. Do you want me to read? **Aidan:** Okay, so there was an allegation? I'm reading. **Joe:** Do I have a text from you saying I was sent the same thing the morning after the verdict? Did you not say that to me? **Aidan:** Yes, you sent me the same thing the morning after the verdict. **Joe:** Okay, so then she sent it to me too. **Aidan:** Yeah, she knowsโ€”she said to me the morning after the Wilburโ€”she after the morning after the show, she said that she was sent a 30-minute fucking tape. Where's the fuck? What tape? Okay, she's not fucking accusing me. I have noโ€”there's no fucking tape. There's no tape. She thinks I recorded her because I fucking told people about the conversation. That's it. **Joe:** You're telling me you didn't? **Aidan:: And I'm telling you I fucking didn't. You're wrong. **Joe:** 100% You're lying, dude. **Aidan:** Okay, so prove it. Let's see it. You got evidence, right? You like evidence? You got Any? **Joe**: I meanโ€”Iโ€”a screenshot ofโ€”how many people did you send it to? **Aidan:** Zero, because there's no recording. **Joe:** There is. **Aidan:** Let's hear it. Play it. Let's play it. Let's go. **Joe:** Let's hold on. Let's hold on. Can I go real quick? So you come in here calling itโ€”you were making fun of Chris because he's an Australian motherfucker. He doesn't have nothing, right? You said there was no text, no proof. And then now we're transitioning to the recording because I don't have the recording. Okay, so you think Karen Read is just fucking lying about this? How would she know? How would she know what about the recording? **Aidan:** There is no recording. **Joe:** You're telling me you didn't show it to anybody? Is that really what you're gonna tell people? **Aidan:**There's no recording to share with anyone. Okay, okay. Well, I mean, you got evidence, right? To back this up. **Joe:** Yeah, right. **Aidan:: You got something, right? Yeah, yeah. Did you been right? I mean, you have that, right? You have that right because you wouldn't say somethingโ€”because if you know I had it, right? **Joe:** I haveโ€”why Karen Read won't speak to you. **Aidan:** You have a screenshot of a conversation with Karen Read. You don't have an actual fucking audio, though. **Joe:** I haveโ€”in Karen Read's words. Why do you think she would lie about this? **Aidan:** Do I think she would lie about having a recording? **Joe:** She wouldn't lie about this. Explain that oneโ€”about having a recording. **Aidan:** Yes, I know she's lying about that. **Joe:** Why, though? **Aidan:** I don't know why Karen is acting the way she is. It's unfortunate. Yeah, and honestly, I'm not the oneโ€”you're a fucking airing it all out right now. That's odd that Karen would green-light you coming on here and fucking doing this. That's kind of odd. Because I love youโ€”notice, but likeโ€”kind of yeah, we raised 1.1 million fucking dollars for a little... Here I knowโ€”here, I'm here. I'm here. There's still aโ€” **Chris;** there's no because youโ€”still a fucking snake. Yeah, I know. He records people's phone calls. **Aidan:: Let's hear the tape. Let's hear the tape. You're the one makingโ€”you guys got nothing. Nothing. Nothing. I just sent the fucking text out. Just sayโ€”there you go, buddy. **Aidan:** Okay, so Karen Read is green-lighting this sort of drama? That's what you're saying? **Joe:** I asked her. I saidโ€”you asked her? She said yes, go ahead. I said, do you want your side out there? She said, 'sure. You're gonna read it? Sure. I told many people my side. This is my last straw. I would never and have never betrayed him. Meanwhile, he has put me in harm's way in a huge way multiple times.' **Aidan:** I put herโ€”fucking words, okay? Not mine. Yep. Okay. I put Karen Read in harm's way? I went to jail for Karen Read. I don't know if you're familiar. **Chris:** You didn't go to jail for Karen Read, you fuck. **Aidan:** Oh, really? Then what am I on bail for? What isโ€”the fullโ€”what's the full? **Chris:** You went to jail for Karen Read? You went to jail because of Lindsey. You went to jail because you're a fucking dick. **Aidan:** Why was I on bail? I think you're a fuckโ€”while you're on bail. I'm saying becauseโ€”why would I care? Maybe someone in the nightโ€” **Chris:** hey, you're full of shit. You're a fucking hell. **Aidan:** What the fuck was I on bail for? **Joe** Because they may know thatโ€”if you didn't record it, why are you being so hush-hush about it with everybody? Why would he just tell the people what she was saying since she's lying? What do you mean hush-hush about it? **Aidan** You think I won't talk about what she texted me? But you were hinting at it because I don't want to hear the fucking drama, but apparently she does because she'sโ€”you fucking do this because you're recording. Thank you. You're telling me no recording of any fucking phone calls? What's theโ€”what's the fight? So you weren't mocking her the past however longโ€”every time you went on the show saying you owe everything to Karen, all that shit? How is that little white lie? **Aidan:** I owe everything to Karen? What? Why is that little sub-story? You went on two weeksโ€”how is that mocking her? That wasn't in the recording. What recording? There's no fucking recording. **Joe:** I heard it was a 10-minute recording. Does that make sense? **Aidan:** No recording, bro. Let's hear it. You heard it. Let's hear it. **Joe:** Dude, I'm not putting that part out here. **Aidan:** She's talking about her shit. What she's texting you right nowโ€”obviously. Who egging this on, isn't she? **Joe:** Who? Okay? Okay, who? Keep playing dumb. Heyโ€”who? **Aidan:** Mm-hmm? Believe it or notโ€”you guys got nothing, right? **Chris;** We got goodโ€”from the horse's mouth, mate. I mean, it's not over the horse. Yeah, that's enough for me. I don't need... **Aidan:** Karen's not talking to anyone in the media. **Joe:** If you read the text message, I just reached out to her as a friendโ€”just to reach out and say hope you're doing well. She went into this whole thing about you. **Aidan:** So you reached outโ€”let me get this rightโ€”you reached out to her just to say hope you're doing well, and the first thing she did was complain about me? **Joe:** Yes, okay. That says it all. There we go. Where is she? Tired of me? Maybe she's fucking tired of you telling the people bullshit. **Aidan:** Whatโ€”whatโ€”whatโ€”whatโ€”what bullshit have I told people? That you have no idea why she won't fucking come on your whatever it is. **Aidan:** What do you mean I have no idea why? **Joe:** That's what you've been sayingโ€”you don't know what's going on, like you feel a bit sorry forโ€”like the thing with the fucking Howie Carr, dude. That was ridiculous. **Aidan:** What was ridiculous? You're the entire way you handledโ€”I didn't say a word about that. **Chris:** Yes, you did. You deleted the receipt, but let's seeโ€”where did I complain about her appearance on Howie Carr? You made a lot of all quiet. Oh, this fuck it. Oh... **Joe:** Wait, but you think we're fucking dumb? Do people are fucking dumb? So where did Iโ€”after you deleted it, and then you made a post about deleting it. **Aidan:** What did I say about it? I don't remember. **Chris:** But you don't remember? Yeah, you deleted it, bro. You deleted it. Yeah, remember? You deleted it. And then you made a post about the deleting of the post. Part 2 coming later.
37:52

(1/2) Last night's Aidan Kearney meltdown over his falling out with Karen Read on an X Space is the peak of catharsis and real-time online toxicity: It starts with the the bombshell claim about Aidan recorded Karen Read, moves to Karen's newly-released texts about being "done" with Aidan after "someone" sent a recording of that conversation to David Yannetti and Alan Jackson, then spirals into ad hominems, and ends with Kearney storming off to counter-publish. The flood of primary source documents posted on online overnight, thus, acts as the host's (Chris) victory lap over Kearney. FULL TRANSCRIPT; *(Cleaned for grammar/spelling, punctuated for flow, and line-broken for readability. Some errors are expected.)* **Aidan:** Am I on? **Host/Other:** You're on. **Aidan:** So who are you? Who is this? **Chris:** Don't worry about it. It doesn't matter who I am. **Aidan:** Well, it does. You're some fucking kangaroo court motherfucker talking about her. What the fuck do you know about anything? **Chris:** Well, I don't know exactly what you've been doing. **Aidan:** So what are your sources? What are your sources? What are your sources you're talking about? Huh? You don't know your sources? What do you talk about? No, your sources. Shut up. Let's see 'em. Let's see your sources. **Lily:** Hang on, Aidan. I'm the host. I'm Lily. **Aidan:** Yes, Lily. Hi, Lily. How are you? **Lily:** I'm good. I'm just going to wait. I know you may not know it, Chris, but you know me. And so I just wanted to say hi. **Aidan:** Yeah, I know, but this Koala motherfucker is up here making shit up, running his mouth nonsense. Let's see the receipts. I mean, what were you talking to Karen Read about? What are you talking about? Who the fuck are you? **Chris:** I'm asking you flat out: Did you or did you not record her phone calls between yourself and Karen? **Aidan:** I did not. I did not. **Chris:** Okay, so Karen is lying? **Aidan:** You talked to Karen Read? Karen isn't talking to anyone in the media, but she's talking to this call-the-motherfucker. That's what you're telling me right now. **Chris:** Like I said, If you want to go down this hill, stand ten toes down." **Aidan:** I'm calling you out because you're making shit up. **Chris:** Who? I'm not making anything up. I'm not making anything up. I'm not making anything up. **Aidan:** So let's see it. Let's see the fucking evidence. Let's see your communications with Karen Read where she says that. Let's see it. **Lily:** Hang on. Chris, you're going to have to provide the receipts. **Chris:** I'm going to tell you, the guy who's doing thisโ€”you know, he's going to put them out. **Chris:** Do you really want to prove it? You want to prove it to me? I've got all the mistakes that come out. I can't. Literally. Yeah. Yeah. Sure. What's that? Let's see it. Let's see it. Produce it. Tweet it out right now. **Aidan:** So I'm denying itโ€”like, hardcore, 100%. I'm the guy you have to deny it to. I don't, because you've become a bit of a fuck-up. It's about as fucking legitimate as Lindsey trying to be a rake. Let's fucking see it, motherfucker. You got it, right? 'Cause Iโ€”accusationsโ€”I always bring fucking receipts. Where's your receipt, bitch? **Aidan:** You got 'em? **Chris:** I've got 'em now. I think you want me to be sayingโ€”to be honestโ€”hang a room on the fucker with no receipt. **Aidan:** You got 'em? Yes or no? **Chris:** I've got a receipt. Where's your fuck? **Chris:** You just need, broโ€”you just need to like chill, because you're gonna have a lot of fucking neck on your face, because I don't really care. **Chris:** I said to the people who bought this story: If I end up having egg on my face, I'll put everyone's name in it, and I'm givenโ€”I have a... Just shut your fucking mouth for one fucking minute. **Aidan:** Right. Let's see it. **Chris:** I've just messaged the person. **Aidan:** Joe Flipp, you want to talk about a fucking psychopath? That motherfucker isโ€”just, Joe Flipp. Really want to fucking go there?" 'Cause it's Joe. You can just say it's Nick from Philadelphia, isn't it? Yeah, I know all about Nick from Philadelphia. If you fucking want to go there and the fucking hellโ€”that psychopathโ€”what Olivia Lambo went through. You just don't want to come out. Does he want to talk about all that? Does he want to launch? **Chris:** Okay? You know what? How was your lunch with Meredith the other week. Fuck it. I don't care. How was your lunch with Meredith? How's your lunch with Meredith? **Aidan:**What the fuck? **Chris:** Chat, what, what am I talking about? How is your lunch with Meredith here? We gotโ€”you know what you want to do? You want to carry on and be a fuck with me here? I like youโ€”always up. **Chris:** How was your lunch with Meredith a couple weeks ago, and what did you play for her? What the fuck are you talking about? Yeah, what the fuck am I talking about? You know exactly what I'm talking about. And I'm trying to do this respectfully, but you come in hot like you always do. So now I'm just gonna fucking do it. How was your lunch with Meredith the other week? **Aidan:** I didn't have one with Meredith. Yeah, bullshit. Okay, so that's it. So someone else is lying now. **Chris:** So you're gonna call Meredith a liar? Why? Meredith's a liar? **Aidan:** Are you talking to Meredith? **Chris:**I'm not talking to Meredith. **Aidan:** What are you talking about? **Chris:** Okay, well, so you have great Meredith in an Oscar. If you said that to Meredith, you just spread rumors. That's what you doโ€”you don't spread any rumors. I want to laugh tonight about this. **Erika Walsh:** I warned you, Chris, about this last night. **Aidan:** You got noโ€”Joe Flippโ€”fucking feeding you nonsense. That slimy psychopath, fucking nut job who called in Olivia's entire family to harass themโ€”to the point where she had the fucking... Nothing to do with Olivia. And Joe's Flippโ€” **Chris:* this is to do with you. Stop deflecting, that motherfucker. **Aidan:** I'm telling you thisโ€”he's the one telling you this. **Chris:** I've been told by three different people. Three different people. There's people in this chat who know about this. There's people in chatโ€”they won't stand up and say anything, but I know the people who know about this. **Aidan:** Bring all these lame cons up one by one so I can slam 'em down one by one, because none of you motherfuckers got a receipt to back up any of this shit. None of you do. Bring it. By adding them. **Chris:** Stand by. Stand by. Stand by. **Joe Flipperhead:** You have the text, bro. You know I saw the screenshot. **Aidan:** So we gonna talk about what you did to Olivia Lambo? We have a lot of things, dude. **Joe:** You're deflecting. When you... **Aidan:** You want to go there? Mark Bedderow? Oh, of being in on a fucking conspiracy against you? To tell usโ€”if when we told you Olivia Lambo... You made us fucking get on a FaceTime with her because you thought she was dead. You thought you were being catfished by her, fucking... I was, and so we agreed to do a Zoom call with her. And when I called you and I told you Olivia Lambo is realโ€”I just saw her face. What did you do? You accused me and Mark Bedderow of lying to you, of being in on it, because you are a fucking psychopathic motherfucker. And I didn't put it there because I don't want to fuck... **Joe:** Yeah, you did put it out there, though. If you want to get into the Olivia thing, that's fine, and I'll go down that road. But you're calling me a psychopath You fucking recorded Karen Read's fucking calls and sent them to people. **Chris:** I'm just gonna keep muting him because he's yelling. You can say it. **Aidan:** Is this Lily's space or yours? **Joe:** I have the text, dude. I'll put it on one of our... Yourโ€”She told me she's fucking done with you, dude. **Aidan:** All right. I'm going on my own right now. I'm calling out fucking Joe Flipp-ed life. If I get muted one more fucking time. I'm gonna do a whole fucking... Thank you. I'm publishing all your fucking textsโ€”the whole world can see what a fucking sadistic psychopath you are. You controlling predator piece of shit. You fucking go there. **Chris:** This is completely the actions of a normal innocent person. **Aidan:* You're a pyscho freak. **Joe:** Yeah, says the guy that recorded Karen. **Aidan:** Oh, yeah, let's hear it. See the fucking recording. Can I hear it? **Joe:** I got the text saying you recorded. But the text says there's a recording, so where's the fucking recording? *Aidan:** Hey, let's hear Joe. Why? I just got asked if I'mโ€”what would you say if I'm a massage in this? Like, goโ€” **Joe:** Why does Liv still text me to this day? **Aidan:** You text her. Oh, you want to see the receipts, dude? I've seen the receiptsโ€”all of them. Okay, I got all the receipts. **Joe:** You got the August ones, the September ones where she misses me and hates how things ended? You got those? Fuck, I see 'em. Publish 'em. I will do it. I don't planโ€”I talk about you. Go for it. **Chris:** You're doing everything back. **Joe:** When I told you how she wouldn't FaceTime me for three months, how she puts up month-old pictures if you wouldn't fucking... **Aidan:** Yeah, you know why? You know why she wouldn't do that? She's just not into you. Ever have you do this with every girl you fucking talk to? **Joe:**You said to me, after reading the text from her sisterโ€” **Chris:** Says the guy who is swining on a 19-year old. **Joe:** You said Aidan, that she said to you, "she's love with you," bro. That's what you said. She's in love with you. That's what you said. Yeah, when her sisterโ€”and then he can get you caught by somebody. Let's just get back to you. Deflection from Aidan, who doesn't want to be on the line. **Joe:** As you wishโ€”she wouldn't FaceTime me. She wouldn't meet up with me, and she lied to me constantly. Yeah, why would she meet up? **Aidan:** Maybe she's just not that into you. Ever think about that? Maybe she's just not that into you. Maybe you saw the text. I know, I knowโ€”it's hard for you to accept that the girl just doesn't want you. You have to accept the person doesn't want nothing to do with you, isn't it? I did, and you got clingy and possessive. And so she fucking stopped talking to you, so you called her mother and you talkedโ€”you don't even know because you're psychotic, bro. I'm fucking... you. *Joe:** You're just deflecting, bro. This is fucking pathetic. I'm not your one. She's talking about this. **Aidan:** I got no fucking thingโ€”youโ€”you are a fucking psychopath. **Joe:** You're first of allโ€”she doesn't want you to fucking be talking about this because why? **Aidan:** You're the one fucking airing it out now, motherfucker. **Chris:** You're the one airing it because you got caught recording Karen. **Aidan:** So let's hear the recording. Let's play the recording. You got a recording of me, right? **Joe:** I know you did it, dude. **Aidan:** What? **Joe:** I know you recorded. Are you lying? Karen Read's a liar? All right, am I...? **Aidan:** You are the fucking coward. Where's the recording? What recording you talking about? You'reโ€”you'reโ€” **Joe:** You're accusing Karen Read of lying about this? **Aidan:** Yes. **Joe:** You're reallyโ€”are you really serious? How many fuckingโ€”serious? **Aidan:** Let's hear the fucking recording. **Lily** Chris or Joe? Please play it. Did it? You didn't have... for people. Can you please provide a receipt? Just like I think it's fair. **Joe:** Aidan has it. **Aidan:: I thought you had it. I thought you had it. Let's hear it. Let's hear the recording. **Joe:** All right, you sent me the text that I sent. You haven't... **Aidan:** Yeah, let'sโ€”so let's hear the actual recording. Does it exist, though? **Joe:** So Karen is lying. **Aidan:: Karen Read would never lie (sarcastic tone). Oh, yeah. **Chris:** True color. *Joe:** So yeah, let me just run this: You recorded it. You recorded the conversation. You showed it to people, and then the very next day she randomly accused you of fucking doing it. That's what happened. That's what your story is, right? **Aidan:** There's no fucking recording. **Joe:** There is, dude. Where is it? **Aidan:** So let me hear it. Play it. **Joe:** I don't fucking have it. **Aidan:** Oh, you don't know if there's a recording, do you? Thank you. Because you're full of shit. I knowโ€”I just fucking caught you. That's what you just said. Thoseโ€”bring it up here. I talked to somebodyโ€”bring her up here. Bring Karen Read up here, bro. You talked to her? Bring her on up here. **Joe:** I spoke to somebody that you played the recording for. Okay, ohโ€”you know, justโ€”I just say I've already said it, so just say it. Okay, I said I wanted to not say her name, but you know whoโ€”you played it for. **Aidan:** I haven't played it for anyone justโ€” there's no recording. **Joe:** Stop fucking lying. Let's hear it from the point. *Aidan:** Let's hear it. Let's hear it. **Joe:** Aidan, this is fucking crazy, dude. **Aidan:** I'm not the one that fucking caught itโ€”got blocked by Olivia's mother, and fucking brother... **Joe** Here we go. This is deflecting, and dudeโ€”that's admitting how fucking guilty you are right here. **Aidan:** Let's hear a fucking recording. You said you got a fucking recording, right? **Joe:** Nobody said that. We saidโ€”oh, Karen Read doesn't want to talk to you anymore because you recorded her calls, set them to people, and it got back to her. **Chris:** I got a question for you, Aidan, I didn't knowโ€”so sure. When you went on your little pity party and then youโ€” **Joe:** The worst part is you lied to everybody acting on it. You had no idea what was wrong and why she she fucking set you straightโ€”trying to get sympathy. That, my friend, is fucking psychotic. **Aidan:** Okay, okay, sure thing. Yeah, you said I sent the recording out. Where's the recording? *Joe:** Dude? It's notโ€”I'm not obligated to fucking get the recording. **Aidan:** Oh, yeah, you wouldn't want to back it up, right? **Joe:** You're soโ€”you're going to go on record that Karen is lying? Say it. You're caling Karen Read a liar about this. **Aidan:** There is no fucking recording. **Joe:** You're lying, dude. It's fucking crazy. This is what's here. Itโ€”play the note. You played it for somebody. You got it. I don't got it. **Aidan:** Let's hear you play it. You're the one that says there's a fucking record. **Chris:** I mean, that'sโ€”you have a history of recording people. **Lily:** Wait, we haveโ€”well, I feel like we have a responsibility as me as a host to Chris and... You're bothโ€”you're actually both not providing a receipt, and I'mโ€”Aidan is actually asking for a receipt. I have toโ€”for the recording. **Joe and Chris** He hasโ€”asking for the recording. **Lily:** You guysโ€”she has which he sent toโ€”we know I said. So who has it? One of the receipts. I know you're not gonna haveโ€” **Aidan:: you don't have the recording becauseโ€” **Lily:** Just fucking say it. Karen doesn't want the recording out there. **Aidan:** What recording? There's no recording. **Joe:** Never even asked her for it, to be honest with you. **Aidan:** And so you waitโ€”yeah, you never asked. Thank youโ€”you never asked. **Joe:** Karen is fucking so done with you, bro. She sentโ€”she told me about this completely unsolicited. **Lily:**That's beside the point, and I'm not the firstโ€”(Joe) Karen's done with him, ..but what the fuckโ€”just post the fucking receipt for him. **Chris:** You can't come on here saying he has it, Lily. He's seen the same thing you've seen. He's even seen the same thing that I showed you. **Lily:** I know. You don't come on here and say I've got this, and then Aidan demands a receiptโ€”you deserve. Okay... **Joe:** He's deflecting, asking for a recording he knows about the text. **Lily:** Yeah, I know, Joe. I get what you're saying, and I respect everyโ€”like what you're saying, but he's denying it. **Joe:** Fine, I'll post the fuckโ€”I'll post them right now. I really don't give a fuck. **Lily:** Thank you. And that's immenseโ€”he canโ€”he can then riff like whatever he can. I can'tโ€”I'm so like nervous. I've got dry mouth because... Then Aidan can like look at those, and he at least hasโ€”you know exactly what's been spoken about. He's just denying it. I can't say that, and I get it, but he is asking for the receipt, which is fair. And **Joe:** I'll even add the text message when he came on here initially. He said it was all alive, right? He said he sent meโ€”fucking text message on Monday morning. **Lily:** I see it. We've established that now. We established that Aidan's denying it, so just post the receipt that you have, and then he can actually reflect on that andโ€”and do you see what I mean? He's not gonna turn around now and say actually it is true. But if you've got the receipt, he can then say, "I willโ€”this is x, y and z there." I just think it's fairโ€”like... **Aidan:** Now, yeah, what he has is a screenshot that he claims is from Karen Read. It wasโ€” **Joe:** You're saying it's not from Karen Read. **Aidan:** I don'tโ€”there's no fucking name on the top. **Joe:** Yeah, I have it. Do you want me to read? **Aidan:** Okay, so there was an allegation? I'm reading. **Joe:** Do I have a text from you saying I was sent the same thing the morning after the verdict? Did you not say that to me? **Aidan:** Yes, you sent me the same thing the morning after the verdict. **Joe:** Okay, so then she sent it to me too. **Aidan:** Yeah, she knowsโ€”she said to me the morning after the Wilburโ€”she after the morning after the show, she said that she was sent a 30-minute fucking tape. Where's the fuck? What tape? Okay, she's not fucking accusing me. I have noโ€”there's no fucking tape. There's no tape. She thinks I recorded her because I fucking told people about the conversation. That's it. **Joe:** You're telling me you didn't? **Aidan:: And I'm telling you I fucking didn't. You're wrong. **Joe:** 100% You're lying, dude. **Aidan:** Okay, so prove it. Let's see it. You got evidence, right? You like evidence? You got Any? **Joe**: I meanโ€”Iโ€”a screenshot ofโ€”how many people did you send it to? **Aidan:** Zero, because there's no recording. **Joe:** There is. **Aidan:** Let's hear it. Play it. Let's play it. Let's go. **Joe:** Let's hold on. Let's hold on. Can I go real quick? So you come in here calling itโ€”you were making fun of Chris because he's an Australian motherfucker. He doesn't have nothing, right? You said there was no text, no proof. And then now we're transitioning to the recording because I don't have the recording. Okay, so you think Karen Read is just fucking lying about this? How would she know? How would she know what about the recording? **Aidan:** There is no recording. **Joe:** You're telling me you didn't show it to anybody? Is that really what you're gonna tell people? **Aidan:**There's no recording to share with anyone. Okay, okay. Well, I mean, you got evidence, right? To back this up. **Joe:** Yeah, right. **Aidan:: You got something, right? Yeah, yeah. Did you been right? I mean, you have that, right? You have that right because you wouldn't say somethingโ€”because if you know I had it, right? **Joe:** I haveโ€”why Karen Read won't speak to you. **Aidan:** You have a screenshot of a conversation with Karen Read. You don't have an actual fucking audio, though. **Joe:** I haveโ€”in Karen Read's words. Why do you think she would lie about this? **Aidan:** Do I think she would lie about having a recording? **Joe:** She wouldn't lie about this. Explain that oneโ€”about having a recording. **Aidan:** Yes, I know she's lying about that. **Joe:** Why, though? **Aidan:** I don't know why Karen is acting the way she is. It's unfortunate. Yeah, and honestly, I'm not the oneโ€”you're a fucking airing it all out right now. That's odd that Karen would green-light you coming on here and fucking doing this. That's kind of odd. Because I love youโ€”notice, but likeโ€”kind of yeah, we raised 1.1 million fucking dollars for a little... Here I knowโ€”here, I'm here. I'm here. There's still aโ€” **Chris;** there's no because youโ€”still a fucking snake. Yeah, I know. He records people's phone calls. **Aidan:: Let's hear the tape. Let's hear the tape. You're the one makingโ€”you guys got nothing. Nothing. Nothing. I just sent the fucking text out. Just sayโ€”there you go, buddy. **Aidan:** Okay, so Karen Read is green-lighting this sort of drama? That's what you're saying? **Joe:** I asked her. I saidโ€”you asked her? She said yes, go ahead. I said, do you want your side out there? She said, 'sure. You're gonna read it? Sure. I told many people my side. This is my last straw. I would never and have never betrayed him. Meanwhile, he has put me in harm's way in a huge way multiple times.' **Aidan:** I put herโ€”fucking words, okay? Not mine. Yep. Okay. I put Karen Read in harm's way? I went to jail for Karen Read. I don't know if you're familiar. **Chris:** You didn't go to jail for Karen Read, you fuck. **Aidan:** Oh, really? Then what am I on bail for? What isโ€”the fullโ€”what's the full? **Chris:** You went to jail for Karen Read? You went to jail because of Lindsey. You went to jail because you're a fucking dick. **Aidan:** Why was I on bail? I think you're a fuckโ€”while you're on bail. I'm saying becauseโ€”why would I care? Maybe someone in the nightโ€” **Chris:** hey, you're full of shit. You're a fucking hell. **Aidan:** What the fuck was I on bail for? **Joe** Because they may know thatโ€”if you didn't record it, why are you being so hush-hush about it with everybody? Why would he just tell the people what she was saying since she's lying? What do you mean hush-hush about it? **Aidan** You think I won't talk about what she texted me? But you were hinting at it because I don't want to hear the fucking drama, but apparently she does because she'sโ€”you fucking do this because you're recording. Thank you. You're telling me no recording of any fucking phone calls? What's theโ€”what's the fight? So you weren't mocking her the past however longโ€”every time you went on the show saying you owe everything to Karen, all that shit? How is that little white lie? **Aidan:** I owe everything to Karen? What? Why is that little sub-story? You went on two weeksโ€”how is that mocking her? That wasn't in the recording. What recording? There's no fucking recording. **Joe:** I heard it was a 10-minute recording. Does that make sense? **Aidan:** No recording, bro. Let's hear it. You heard it. Let's hear it. **Joe:** Dude, I'm not putting that part out here. **Aidan:** She's talking about her shit. What she's texting you right nowโ€”obviously. Who egging this on, isn't she? **Joe:** Who? Okay? Okay, who? Keep playing dumb. Heyโ€”who? **Aidan:** Mm-hmm? Believe it or notโ€”you guys got nothing, right? **Chris;** We got goodโ€”from the horse's mouth, mate. I mean, it's not over the horse. Yeah, that's enough for me. I don't need... **Aidan:** Karen's not talking to anyone in the media. **Joe:** If you read the text message, I just reached out to her as a friendโ€”just to reach out and say hope you're doing well. She went into this whole thing about you. **Aidan:** So you reached outโ€”let me get this rightโ€”you reached out to her just to say hope you're doing well, and the first thing she did was complain about me? **Joe:** Yes, okay. That says it all. There we go. Where is she? Tired of me? Maybe she's fucking tired of you telling the people bullshit. **Aidan:** Whatโ€”whatโ€”whatโ€”whatโ€”what bullshit have I told people? That you have no idea why she won't fucking come on your whatever it is. **Aidan:** What do you mean I have no idea why? **Joe:** That's what you've been sayingโ€”you don't know what's going on, like you feel a bit sorry forโ€”like the thing with the fucking Howie Carr, dude. That was ridiculous. **Aidan:** What was ridiculous? You're the entire way you handledโ€”I didn't say a word about that. **Chris:** Yes, you did. You deleted the receipt, but let's seeโ€”where did I complain about her appearance on Howie Carr? You made a lot of all quiet. Oh, this fuck it. Oh... **Joe:** Wait, but you think we're fucking dumb? Do people are fucking dumb? So where did Iโ€”after you deleted it, and then you made a post about deleting it. **Aidan:** What did I say about it? I don't remember. **Chris:** But you don't remember? Yeah, you deleted it, bro. You deleted it. Yeah, remember? You deleted it. And then you made a post about the deleting of the post. Part 2 coming later.

Grant Smith Ellis

85,913 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 11 Monaten

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If youโ€™re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Melloโ€™s affidavit. Itโ€™s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didnโ€™t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Melloโ€™s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I donโ€™t know. What the fuck do I know? Iโ€™m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peterโ€™s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means Iโ€™m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, thatโ€™s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kateโ€™s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindseyโ€™s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aidenโ€™s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peterโ€™s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, โ€œWhy are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.โ€ Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, letโ€™s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged inโ€”and I think it was Kate actually who did itโ€”but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if thatโ€™s what happened with Leighaโ€”I donโ€™t know, I wasnโ€™t aroundโ€”not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, itโ€™s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one wouldโ€”itโ€™s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just donโ€™t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, donโ€™t fucking do it. Please donโ€™t do it. I donโ€™t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I donโ€™t understand why people justify it. Oh, itโ€™s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. Itโ€™s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Donโ€™t do it back. Just stop. Itโ€™s ridiculous. Steph's likeโ€”"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I donโ€™t know what to tell you. You donโ€™t have to call her that, but Iโ€™m going to do that, right? And Iโ€™m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Even while youโ€™re on your break. By the way, Steph, Iโ€™m just going to break here just posting things, right? And Iโ€™m saying Iโ€™m not even supposed to be riled up right now. Weโ€™re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. Iโ€™m just a little towel. Iโ€™m on one, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Absolutely not. I donโ€™t know which Steph you are. I donโ€™t know if youโ€™re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. Youโ€™re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Iโ€™m going to triple down. Iโ€™m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. Iโ€™ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, itโ€™s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, sheโ€™s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, thatโ€™s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and Iโ€™m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Itโ€™s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you donโ€™t want to be talked about in public. Thatโ€™s the reality. Is that not right Steph, youโ€™re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, whoโ€™s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to peopleโ€™s reports in this chat, and you feel that itโ€™s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because youโ€™re biased, right? Fine, I donโ€™t care. Iโ€™ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Letโ€™s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. Thatโ€™s correct. I donโ€™t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, letโ€™s be clear. I wouldnโ€™t say youโ€™re debating me, Steph. You canโ€™t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. Itโ€™s almost like thereโ€™s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peterโ€™s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And youโ€™re not going to be able to do anything about itโ€”oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "whatโ€™s wrong with towel, Steph?" Youโ€™re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, โ€œWhat is Grant doing?โ€ because I wonโ€™t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody elseโ€™s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And thereโ€™s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. Iโ€™m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? Weโ€™ll do it. No, no, Iโ€™m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. Iโ€™m loyal to truth. Iโ€™m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. Iโ€™m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, letโ€™s go with that. Yep, letโ€™s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. Thatโ€™s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctorโ€™s familyโ€™s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? Iโ€™ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. Sheโ€™s riling me up. Youโ€™re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what Iโ€™m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if youโ€™re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. Youโ€™ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesnโ€™t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because weโ€™re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. Iโ€™ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Donโ€™t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I donโ€™t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinelyโ€”not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, โ€œHe wonโ€™t know.โ€ What, are you just going to tell me Iโ€™m the greatest thing ever and then itโ€™s going to go along? Iโ€™m just saying, Iโ€™ve been posting on social media being like, โ€œAidan, if people tell you that youโ€™re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because theyโ€™re moles.โ€ Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What Iโ€™m concerned about, okayโ€”Iโ€™m not concerned about who you are as a person. Iโ€™m concerned about what you didnโ€™t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, whatโ€™s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™sโ€”see what Iโ€™m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for youโ€”Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. Thatโ€™s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. Itโ€™s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. Thatโ€™s just odd. Like sheโ€™s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one whoโ€™s a second cousin of John Oโ€™Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. Thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, broโ€”if you are that Stephโ€”you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minuteโ€”are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was notโ€”I didnโ€™t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I donโ€™t even haveโ€”no, that is not the question Iโ€™m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, itโ€™s not the same Steph. Itโ€™s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. Iโ€™m rolling my eyes so hard Iโ€™m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If youโ€™re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. Youโ€™re bothering me. If you bother me too much, Iโ€™m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So itโ€™s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldnโ€™t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which Iโ€™m doing. You havenโ€™t addressed one element of it on substance. All youโ€™ve done is gaslight, and frankly youโ€™re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, donโ€™t be discriminatory; two, donโ€™t be derogatory; three, donโ€™t sealion; four, donโ€™t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jayโ€™s like, โ€œIโ€™m aboard the Grant train.โ€ Thanks, Jay. It wasnโ€™t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done. Oh, itโ€™s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. Weโ€™ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? Iโ€™m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just donโ€™tโ€”I donโ€™t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Brโ€ฆ every possible perspective. I donโ€™t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. Itโ€™s not that. Iโ€™ll never ever have a problem with that. Itโ€™s the bad faithโ€”and itโ€™s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. Youโ€™ve never done itโ€”but itโ€™s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still donโ€™t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope thatโ€”I hope that tells us all something. But yes, letโ€™s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we wereโ€”I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very lastโ€”so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like thatโ€™s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middleโ€”thatโ€™s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, thatโ€”I donโ€™t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinksโ€”who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think heโ€™s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently sheโ€™s a big advocate of prednisone. I donโ€™t really understand. Sheโ€™s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they canโ€™t use cannabis. Iโ€™m baffled by it. I didnโ€™t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether sheโ€™s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because Iโ€™ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, sheโ€™s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peterโ€™s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesnโ€™t know what sheโ€™s talking about and she doesnโ€™t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesnโ€™t own it.
33:21

When I was reading Brian Tully, Ken Mello and Robert Cosgrove's affidavits yesterday in the Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney case, I was challenged by an account that was intent on defending Leigha Bathtub Genduso and Kate Peter. Best quotes from my retort; "Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Thirdly: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. Why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record, as well? Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. Reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kit and caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done." PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT: If youโ€™re just tuning in, my name is Grant Smith Ellis, and we are reading through Brian Tully, Robert Cosgrove, and Ken Melloโ€™s affidavit. Itโ€™s tough to call it an affidavit from Ken Mello, because quite frankly, he didnโ€™t write an affidavit. Robert Cosgrove adapted hearsay statements in Ken Melloโ€™s voice in his own affidavit. That might tell you something. I donโ€™t know. What the fuck do I know? Iโ€™m just a towel. Thank you very much for tuning in. I have noticed that there is a very specific group of people in Kate Peterโ€™s orbit trying to target Towel right now. People do not want Towel to be heard. That means Iโ€™m going to speak more. I am going to just keep talking and keep saying things, because now I have put it all together. Oh, thatโ€™s right. I have one more thing to type. Furthermore, as soon as, within weeks of Kateโ€™s emails to Tully and Mello being turned over in, what was it? August of 2025, the TurtleBoy charges involving Lindsey Gaetani were dropped. And what do you know? Kate was involved in handling evidence submitted by Tully and Mello to the grand jury for Lindseyโ€™s charges, for the charges involving Lindsey Gaetani, for Aidenโ€™s charges involving Lindsey Gaetani. Furthermore, the new email from Kate to Mello indicates Kate was indeed also involved in the 2023 indictments against Kearney that the Norfolk DA seems intent on trying to wall off from Kate Peterโ€™s involvement. Oh, little towels, I'm just a little towel. Steph, Grant says, โ€œWhy are you making fun of her by calling her bathtub.โ€ Wait, what? No, no, no, Steph, letโ€™s be very clear. When Leigha Genduso engaged inโ€”and I think it was Kate actually who did itโ€”but when Leigha Genduso or Kate responded to revenge porn with revenge porn, nothing about that was okay, okay? Whether it was legal or not at the time, nobody sharing revenge porn of anybody else was okay, all right? I just want to be very clear. So when Kate did it, it was not okay. When Aiden did it, if thatโ€™s what happened with Leighaโ€”I donโ€™t know, I wasnโ€™t aroundโ€”not okay. If Leigha did it to Aiden, not okay, okay? Everybody on the same page? Like, itโ€™s not okay to do that to people. I just want everyone on the same page. No one wouldโ€”itโ€™s just like, treat people how you want to be treated, bro. So I just donโ€™t do it. Now, I get some people would say, fight fire with fire, okay, still, donโ€™t fucking do it. Please donโ€™t do it. I donโ€™t understand why people do it. It blows my mind. I donโ€™t understand why people justify it. Oh, itโ€™s okay that Kate or Leigha did it, cause Aiden did it too. Itโ€™s like, no, though. I get it's a shitty thing to happen. Donโ€™t do it back. Just stop. Itโ€™s ridiculous. Steph's likeโ€”"I keep seeing you call her bathtub." Yea, bro she took a video in a bathtub once and posted it on social media. Okay, you want to livestream yourself from a fucking bathtub then I'm going to call you Leigha Bathtub Genduso. I donโ€™t know what to tell you. You donโ€™t have to call her that, but Iโ€™m going to do that, right? And Iโ€™m not going to stop. But yeah, Three-Clerk-Monte bang bang. Sometimes you just got to tell them how it is, Three-Clerk Monte, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Even while youโ€™re on your break. By the way, Steph, Iโ€™m just going to break here just posting things, right? And Iโ€™m saying Iโ€™m not even supposed to be riled up right now. Weโ€™re going to go back to reading the indictment in a little bit. Iโ€™m just a little towel. Iโ€™m on one, you know what Iโ€™m saying? Absolutely not. I donโ€™t know which Steph you are. I donโ€™t know if youโ€™re that Steph or whatever, the fake Canadian. Youโ€™re not going to come on here and tell me I cannot call her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Iโ€™m going to triple down. Iโ€™m going to call Leigha Bathtub Genduso more now. Thank you for all the comments, by the way. It helps the stream get attention in the Kate Peter sucks. Remember that? Yes, that I want you to get this tattooed on your arm: Kate Peter sucks. Iโ€™ll help you spell it: K-A-T-E P-E-T-E-R, no S at the end, just Kate Peter, now a new word, sucks, S-U-C-K-S. Everybody on the same page? All right, itโ€™s artistic expression, bro. What do you want to say? Oh no, sheโ€™s gone. Steph, I was enjoying all your comments. Yes, Steph, thatโ€™s exactly what I want. I want you to keep interacting in the comments because it gets the stream more attention in the feed. I want that. I want you to continue to engage, and Iโ€™m going to keep calling her Leigha Bathtub Genduso. Itโ€™s not an obsession. It is the product of multiple years of work on the story to uncover something hidden that you donโ€™t want to be talked about in public. Thatโ€™s the reality. Is that not right Steph, youโ€™re concerned that Kate Peter compromised the cases against Aiden Kearney because she worked as a PI for Marty Craft, whoโ€™s now lost his license because of what she was up to according to peopleโ€™s reports in this chat, and you feel that itโ€™s uncomfortable to have to hold her to the same moral standard that you do Aiden because youโ€™re biased, right? Fine, I donโ€™t care. Iโ€™ll tell it to your face yes. No, Steph, you have something to say? You say it right here, one-on-one. Letโ€™s debate. We can do it. I have all the evidence now. We can talk about it all. Thatโ€™s correct. I donโ€™t create realities, Steph. I bring them to light. Your normative moral framework and what you want to happen is just that. The descriptive reality is independent of what any of us want. It is simply a factual record. In the context of our asymptotic relationship with that factual record, notwithstanding, I was interested in the truth, and you are who is afraid of it, letโ€™s be clear. I wouldnโ€™t say youโ€™re debating me, Steph. You canโ€™t debate on the merit of the facts. You want to know why? Because, for example, it would be very hard for you to counter something like this paragraph right here, right? Where Robert Cosgrove says that any data missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone was not on the phone at the time Brian Tully did the extraction. And you might be saying to yourself, Grant, how can you know? How can you know that Brian Tully intentionally released the phone unredacted after only removing messages from Kate to Lindsey and from Tully to Lindsey and after removing things like audio messages from Leigha Genduso? How do I know? Well, because how else would Lindsey have posted it on social media? My word, Steph. Itโ€™s almost like thereโ€™s proof that Robert Cosgrove was withholding material information related to the sum and substance of Kate Peterโ€™s communications with various members of the prosecution team and/or witnesses and/or the handling of evidence in order to insulate certain charges from Kate Peter touching that evidence so that they could continue to trial, notwithstanding the discovery obligations of the state under the new updated Rule 14 as implemented on March 1, 2025. And towel is in a snarky mood indeed. And youโ€™re not going to be able to do anything about itโ€”oh, please, you're not saying to yourself, "whatโ€™s wrong with towel, Steph?" Youโ€™re basically saying, "why are you crossing the thin blue line?" And I would like to respond to you by saying, in the least unloving way, but the fact that you would ask me, โ€œWhat is Grant doing?โ€ because I wonโ€™t adhere to your thin blue line? Get the fuck out of here. Go climb up somebody elseโ€™s tree. Go find your own treehouse. Not happening. Absolutely not happening. You will look this factual record in the eye. You will confront your moral problems with the various actions of different people involved on your own time. And Leigha Bathtub Genduso will be central to this moral reckoning. And thereโ€™s not a damn thing you or your fake Canadian ass can do about it. Iโ€™m on one. I told you. Listen, you want it? You want it to be on record? Weโ€™ll do it. No, no, Iโ€™m just not loyal to your interests, Steph. Iโ€™m loyal to truth. Iโ€™m loyal to the people who are actually harmed. Iโ€™m not loyal to you or any of your friends or Kate Peter or the thin blue line or the thin green line or the thin pink line for that matter. All of you can take your lines and go fuck yourselves. Fake Canadian. Yeah, right, Steph. Yeah, letโ€™s go with that. Yep, letโ€™s go with fake Canadian, because why would you want me looking more in to you? A reporter? You want me to look more into you? No. God, take the L, man, just move on. Thatโ€™s correct. No, listen, Steph, you want to talk about Michael Proctorโ€™s familyโ€™s relationship to my mother? You want to be the person who draws that line? Iโ€™ll tell you about it. You sure you want to talk about it? You damn fake Canadian. We may have to get this fake Canadian out of here. Sheโ€™s riling me up. Youโ€™re riling me up by trying to defend Kate Peter. I knew you were a rat the whole time. Goddamn Kate Peter mole. I knew it. I saw through that shit. "I just heard you acknowledge me about the AI. No hate. I appreciate you reading this. Good content." Thank you, sir. Thank you, to the person who said that! You see what Iโ€™m saying, Steph? You know what? I think we should just let Steph talk to herself, all right? She can just keep promoting the stream and the algorithm. Let her talk to herself. But Steph, even if youโ€™re talking to yourself, I still have to write the post, okay? Damn fake Canadians. Steph is a fake Canadian and she may or may not be a communist. What you gonna' do about it? You damn fake Canadian. All right, no, I actually have to write this follow-up post. Stop it, Steph. Stop trying to gaslight to protect Kate Peter. Youโ€™ll be thrown out of here faster than someone with a cannabis conviction trying to enter Canada who doesnโ€™t actually live there. Damn fake Canadians. Thank you, Kristina. I appreciate it. Yes, and Kristina, you ever wonder if maybe people come in here specifically to derail the conversation because weโ€™re talking about very damning things as to Kate Peter? Well then, let me write my other post, by the way. Iโ€™ll help. I will put it up on the screen for you in one second. I just got to get the video loading before I start typing. Oh, Steph, you were on assignment. Stop bitching. I hope they paid you well for it. Donโ€™t bark up my towel tree about you had to spend time with me so you could run intel to all the Kate Peter people. I donโ€™t care. I knew what you were doing. Do you think I was born yesterday? Come on. You all insult my intelligence routinelyโ€”not you in the chat. Some of you moles are just like, โ€œHe wonโ€™t know.โ€ What, are you just going to tell me Iโ€™m the greatest thing ever and then itโ€™s going to go along? Iโ€™m just saying, Iโ€™ve been posting on social media being like, โ€œAidan, if people tell you that youโ€™re the greatest thing ever, that might be true, but some of them are going to tell you that because theyโ€™re moles.โ€ Come on. This is very basic-level intel stuff here. Steph, that was very nice of you. I am never going to degrade you for supporting people in need. What Iโ€™m concerned about, okayโ€”Iโ€™m not concerned about who you are as a person. Iโ€™m concerned about what you didnโ€™t tell us. All right? Yeah? And that's my right. No, absolutely not, Steph. You know exactly what happened. You flipped on a dime as soon as I started asking questions about Kate Peter because she has a lot of moles in her orbit. And then as soon as we started talking about her today, coincidentally enough, you popped right back up. Oh, whatโ€™s this? Robert Cosgrove represented in a sworn affidavit that any material missing from Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™sโ€”see what Iโ€™m doing, Steph? This is, uh, this is for youโ€”Lindsey Gaetaniโ€™s phone extraction was not on the phone when MSP did that extraction. And then Brian Tully leaked that extraction unredacted. Thatโ€™s a message from Leigha Bathtub Genduso proves Tully failed to include material that was indeed on Lindsey's phone. That was for you too, Steph. Itโ€™s weird that you know Bathtub, by the way. Thatโ€™s just odd. Like sheโ€™s known Kate Peter for years too. If this Steph, who I watched Sandlot with, is the same Steph as the one whoโ€™s a second cousin of John Oโ€™Keefe, then she lied to me. She lied to me. If we can prove that this is the same, same Steph, then she lied to me. She told me she was from Canada, Saskatchewan, whatever the fuck. Thatโ€™s what Iโ€™m saying. So Steph, if you are that Steph from wherever the fuck you live, broโ€”if you are that Stephโ€”you lied to us all. You told us you were fucking Canadian. Wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minute, wait a minuteโ€”are you actually that Steph? No fucking way. You lied to all of us this whole time and pretended to be Canadian? No, that was notโ€”I didnโ€™t ask if you were from Canada. I said, are you the same Steph who was second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe and did you come on this channel and go on a Zoom call with me representing yourself to be Canadian from Saskatchewan? I donโ€™t even haveโ€”no, that is not the question Iโ€™m asking you. Are you the same Steph that is second cousins with John Oโ€™Keefe? Thanks for letting us know. See what I mean? Kristina, itโ€™s not the same Steph. Itโ€™s just some random person who really likes Leigha Genduso, Leigha Bathtub Genduso, and Kate Peter. Random coincidence! Just totally random. Come on. Iโ€™m rolling my eyes so hard Iโ€™m laughing. This has been really interesting though. I know you said no. That makes it even weirder. If youโ€™re not that Steph, your fervent defense of Kate Peter and Leigha Bathtub Genduso is even more weird. Go back to Discord. Come on now, shoo. Youโ€™re bothering me. If you bother me too much, Iโ€™m just going to go on a 45-minute rant eviscerating Kate Peter with facts, all right? So itโ€™s better to just go. Like I told Benny Sweatpants the other day. Send him my regards, all right? No, I like calling out your hypocrisy. You wouldnโ€™t say a negative word about Kate Peter if I demonstrated the factual record for you in real time. Live! Which Iโ€™m doing. You havenโ€™t addressed one element of it on substance. All youโ€™ve done is gaslight, and frankly youโ€™re going to find yourself removed if you continue to fail to adhere to the rules of Towel Channel. As you know, the rules of Towel Channel are pretty simple, which is: one, donโ€™t be discriminatory; two, donโ€™t be derogatory; three, donโ€™t sealion; four, donโ€™t gaslight; and five, no Kate Peters. All right? Jayโ€™s like, โ€œIโ€™m aboard the Grant train.โ€ Thanks, Jay. It wasnโ€™t one question, Steph. It was three questions. Let me reiterate them to you very quickly. Number one, Steph, please address the factโ€”please address why Kate Peterโ€™s February 24, 2024 email to Ken Mello was not turned over in the 5,000 pages of emails that Robert Cosgrove spent seven months putting together that were between Kate Peter and Ken Mello and Kate Peter and Brian Tully. Why was that February 24, 2024 email not turned over? Secondly, is the fact that those emails were turned overโ€”despite the fact that it wasnโ€™t a full turnover of emailsโ€”in August of 2025 tie into why the Lindsey Gaetani charges involving Aiden were dismissed? Second question: is the fact that Kate Peterโ€”now we know from these documentsโ€”directly handled two pieces of key evidence in the Gaetani indictments involving Kearney the reason why, coupled with the August 2025 disclosure of those manipulated email records between Tully and Kate and Kate Peter and Ken Mello, was that the reason why the 2024 indictments involving Lindsey Gaetani were actually null-prossed? Time to answer some tough questions, Steph. And furthermore, why was that audio of Leigha Genduso not included in the extraction that Brian Tully released completely unredacted in April of 2024? And why have you never said a word about how Tully manipulated that extraction to remove messages from Tully to Lindsey and from Kate to Lindsey before releasing it? And Tully apparently didnโ€™t include Leigha Gendusoโ€™s audio message that is now part of the public court record. Yes, Steph, you canโ€™t address it on merit, you canโ€™t, because youโ€™re not here to do that, are you? Youโ€™re here to vacuously distract with nonsensical emotional rhetoric. And I will not stand for it. No, Iโ€™ll continue reading. Itโ€™ll get worse before it gets better, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you that right now. No, she did not, Steph. Iโ€™ll tell you what, right now. You know how I know? Because look at Steph, it was posted on social media. Oh, Steph, it was posted on social media and not included in the extraction. So how could Lindsey have deleted it? Lindsey saved it, because Tully didnโ€™t include it in the extraction, and then Lindsey dropped it on social media. And that proves it. That absolutely proves it. All right, so Steph, if you donโ€™t know and donโ€™t care, thatโ€™s the end of this discussion. If we have to move you on begrudgingly, we will. But as of now, you canโ€™t address any of this on merit. You donโ€™t know the factual record. Youโ€™re getting humiliated. And furthermore, Iโ€™m sending a message through you to Kate that her moles are not welcome here. So, well, yeah, but no, thatโ€™s notโ€”hold on, do you realize, Steph, the point is not where it was posted. It was that the audio file exists. If it was not on Lindseyโ€™s phone when they did the extraction, she couldnโ€™t have it. But she still has it. There you go. So, listen, oh, I knew we were onto something. I didnโ€™t know it was this bad, Steph. You shouldnโ€™t have tipped Kateโ€™s hand like this, by the way. The reacting that way is only making me aware that this is the whole kitten caboodle. No, Steph, again, you have no standing to stand up for anyone, call anyone anything, or otherwise say anything here, because you will not address the merits of the argument. You just admitted you donโ€™t care about the filings, you donโ€™t know the details, and you refuse to engage. So therefore, weโ€™re done. Oh, itโ€™s such a shame. All right, I gotta move her on. All right, Steph, it was great. Weโ€™ll put you in a little timeout. You can come back tomorrow, okay? Iโ€™m glad you spent some time with us, but the reality is I just donโ€™tโ€”I donโ€™t wanna play that type of Kate Peter game, all right? Yep, now, Christina, you, as you know, this channel in Brโ€ฆ every possible perspective. I donโ€™t care what you want to come in here and believe, you know you and I align on a lot of the factual record about a lot of these different cases. Itโ€™s not that. Iโ€™ll never ever have a problem with that. Itโ€™s the bad faithโ€”and itโ€™s not you, Christina. You are wonderful. Youโ€™ve never done itโ€”but itโ€™s the people who get too close to Kate Peter and then as embodied in that colloquy with Steph right there, whoever the fuck she is, we still donโ€™t know. As embodied in that colloquy, you have a situation where when confronted with the facts instead of responding or even giving the time of day to what Kate Peter or Tully or Cosgrove might have done wrong, immediately it starts with the emotional manipulation, the attacks, the distraction. So I hope thatโ€”I hope that tells us all something. But yes, letโ€™s keep reading because before I got in that fun colloquy, we wereโ€”I bet Steph was sent here to try to derail me. Nice try, Steph, take it elsewhere. All right, so we got those two posts up, by the way. All right, following service. Do you remember where we were in all this? The very lastโ€”so we just read about the Kate emails. By the way, now we know the whole Kate and Kaboodle is the Kate emails. We just read about the Kate emails and take a look where it goes next. All right, it just keeps going and going. Oh, do you think I should add Kate, Steph to the chart, by the way? Where should she go on the chart? Should she go under the Trollhollmio section? I feel like thatโ€™s appropriate. You know, this is just my opinion of how all these people tie together. Say you got Kate Peter, the Lord of Darkness in the middleโ€”thatโ€™s my opinion. Then you got Jamz up there, Llama over there, Jason Broyles down here, Gaffney over here, Trollhollomio here. Then you got people like Critical Mass, Virgil, thatโ€”I donโ€™t know who that is. And then you got Tully, Michael Morrissey, and Michael Proctor. Then you got Jake Sun, Twisted Tragedies tied to Gaffney. Then you got that guy, Jason Broyles, who thinksโ€”who pretends to be a woman online. You got him, I think heโ€™s tied to Barry Lewis and this weird woman from Connecticut that Kate keeps working with. She used to pretend to be like an advocate for medical patients, but now apparently sheโ€™s a big advocate of prednisone. I donโ€™t really understand. Sheโ€™s been going online telling people that people with colitis have to use prednisone apparently and they canโ€™t use cannabis. Iโ€™m baffled by it. I didnโ€™t know she was a doctor. Listen, if I knew that this woman was a doctor, I would start looking to whether sheโ€™s received payments from the pharmaceutical industry because Iโ€™ve never met a cannabis advocate who tells people they have to use prednisone for colitis. So that woman baffles me. Also, sheโ€™s the reason consumption event in Massachusetts are now regulated by the CCC. So listen, you all think that Kate Peterโ€™s just some kind of like moron. She just plays that role, okay? Like she plays like she doesnโ€™t know what sheโ€™s talking about and she doesnโ€™t mostly with these court developments. But look at her network. Like people fawn over her like TurtleBoy. She is the female TurtleBoy in so many ways. And what makes her scary is she doesnโ€™t own it.

Grant Smith Ellis

13,617 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten

Good morning. In November of 2024, I laid out why Brian Tully, Kate Peter, and Jason Broyles leaked an unredacted 15-year extraction of Lindsey Gaetani's phone. I didn't want the world to listen to me. I wanted someone, somewhere, to protect Lindsey. I can finally breathe. Here is the full text of my report (that now has 700,000 views); Okay, fine, as a special treat (on this, the day of oral arguments in the #KarenReadTrial appeal), I will lay out some of what I am thinking as to the timeline of events between August of 2023 and the spring of 2024. You are going to get a lot of inside information in this post. You have been warned. In the fall of 2023, via a woman named Natalie (who was friends with Karen Read and enjoyed talking about houseplants with Karen), I believe the Commonwealth of Massachusetts came to be in possession of evidence indicating that Read and blogger Aiden Turtle Boy Kearney were conspiring to intimidate witnesses in Read's ongoing criminal trial related to the murder of John O'Keefe. See the evidence of that contact (which started in April/May of 2023 --because of Natalie-- and occurred directly with Read and via Read's lawyers, David Yannetti and Alan Jackson) here - As a result of this information being uncovered, I believe the Commonwealth then began targeting Mr. Kearney with criminal charges related to witness intimidation in the context of Read's criminal trial (Kearney had been organizing, with Read's help, rallies at the homes of witnesses in the case and running smear campaigns to poison the jury pool in the lead up to Read's trial). I believe the intent of this targeting was multifaceted but, primarily, involved the following: 1) Getting Kearney to stop his abhorrent behavior related to witnesses in Read's case (which included, in some cases, Kearney's followers putting semen on pictures of witnesses' children and then sending those pictures to said witnesses, as explained here - 2) Placing criminal charges on Kearney in an effort to pressure him to "flip" on Karen Read and, in turn, testify that Read did, indeed, order the witness intimidation in question via a conspiracy. Kearney, when he was eventually jailed in late 2023/early 2024, confirmed that such an offer was presented while he was incarcerated. 3) Getting information for the Massachusetts State Police, and the Norfolk District Attorney, as to the nature of an ongoing federal probe into the conduct of those departments (an investigation which, in time, it turns out had moved on from investigating John O'Keefe's death and, in turn, evolved into a probe of a potential cover-up of the death of Sandra Birchmore). Read more background on that complex situation --involving two Troopers assigned to the Norfolk DA, who also worked on the Read case, that signed off on a "misleading" state-level police report into Matthew Farwell-- here - At the same time, and in furtherance of those investigatory activities, I believe the State Police began working directly with a former colleague of Aiden Kearney, a woman named Kate Peter AKA MafiaMasshole who has a small online cult following related to humiliating First Amendment Auditors (which, admittedly, is noble work). What may have not been so noble (along with Peter taking cash in a Chick-Fil-A parking lot for her "efforts" on behalf of some wealthy witnesses in the Read trial), however, is that --as Mr. Kearney became the subject of police investigations related to the aforementioned witness intimidation-- the Norfolk DA announced to the public that a Special Prosecutor would be appointed to oversee those charges (because of the numerous allegations of corruption that Kearney had made towards the DA in public). That Special Prosecutor, Ken Mello, was nonetheless assigned to work with the same State Police Trooper (Brian Tully) who worked on the Read case and who reported directly to the Norfolk DA at the time. And, furthermore, I believe the State Police and the Norfolk DA, via Brian Tully, also around this time (fall of 2023) began working directly with Kate Peter (who, for some time, was working for a Private Investigations firm with ties to a number of figures in the orbit of the Read case) in order to obtain evidence against Mr. Kearney, seek out and catalog information from sources close to Mr. Kearney and, in some cases, even help draft parts of Mr. Kearney's eventually October, 2023, criminal indictment. However, what I think the State Police (and the Norfolk DA) did not know at the time was that Aiden Kearney was working as a confidential federal informant, specifically looking into allegations of civil rights violations against said State Police, since at least May of 2023. Furthermore, I also think the State Police were not aware that it was Karen Read's lawyers, Alan Jackson and David Yannetti, who had the necessary connections in order to help Kearney obtain that status. Read more here - That said, at the same time, when Kearney was initially brought on by the federal government in May of 2023, in my view, I don't think the DOJ was finished looking into the death of John O'Keefe. In fact, I think the DOJ pulled out an old FBI tactic (which I can confirm exists) and, after the US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts wrapped-up the O'Keefe probe in the fall of 2023, Kearney was encouraged by the FBI to use his coverage of the Read case to generate leads related to other misconduct by the State Police unit attached to the Norfolk DA (in particular Brian Tully). Read more about that FBI playbook here - Indeed, that timeline perfectly synchs with a recent announcement by US Attorney Josh Levy indicating that the federal probe of Sandra Birchmore's death began in, roughly, August of 2023. See more background on Birchmore's tragic life and death here - Nonetheless, because of Kearney's ongoing work for the federal government in the fall of 2023, and because the State Police did not realize this was happening (although they should have been able to put it together, because Kate Peter and Kevin from Yellow Cottage Tails for sure knew, as early as May of 2023, that FBI agents were calling around, on behalf of Kearney, related to ongoing criminal cases entirely removed from the Read trial) I believe said State Police, stupidly, committed some of the very civil rights violations that the FBI was looking for. I believe the State Police did this, in particular Brian Tully, by way of his relationship to Kate Peter. [Side note: I will always remember talking to Kate, over winter and spring of 2024, and explaining my firm belief that Aiden Kearney was an FBI agent. Peter simply could not come to terms with that reality, despite having been the person who called the FBI back in May in order to confirm the agency was poking around some of Kearney's criminal cases, and, in that moment, I knew that pride was, indeed, about to cometh before her fall.] And, indeed, I also think Karen Read, herself, was well aware that the federal probe into John's death had ended in the fall of 2023 (for the most part) and that, in turn, the feds were going to move on to other serious allegations of corruption related to Tully and his unit at the State Police. However, for many reasons, I think Karen was happy to let the FBI (and TurtleBoy) use her trial as "cover" to get more information, and leads, related to said Troopers (this was, after all, the very same unit that had investigated Read and mocked her with horrifying language during that process). [Also, another side note, there is an intense history of tension between the Norfolk DA's office and the DOJ in Boston which dates back to the 1990's and William Delahunt, but which, in reality, really heated up during a 2015 mob trial.] Basically, there is a connection between Josh Levy (Acting US Attorney For District of Massachusetts) + Karen Read (accused murderer) + Dustin Chao (head of Boston DOJ's Public Integrity Section) + David Yannetti (lawyer for accused murderer Karen Read) + Rachael Rollins (former Suffolk County DA, and US Attorney for the district of Massachusetts, until Spring of 2023, who was also Josh Levy's boss in November of 2022 and who previously had direct contact with Read's lawyer, Mr. Yannetti) + Aiden TurtleBoy Kearney (blogger indicted with 19 felonies in relation to targeting witnesses in the Read case, until he was thrown out of Read's inner circle for exposing Read's connection to Acting US Attorney Levy). Chao (aforementioned head of the DOJ Boston's Public Integrity Section) had a grudge to use whatever means necessary take down the Norfolk DA since 2015 (After Chao's wife was passed over for a promotion and left that DA's office on bad terms) and, in turn, the proxy-battle behind all of this chaos becomes a bit more clear. Read the primary source documents laying all of this out here - and here - That said, I think there one was wild-card who came into the picture between October of 2023 that no one (be it Kate Peter, the FBI, the DOJ, the State Police, Aiden Kearney or otherwise) expected, and her name is Lindsey Gaetani. At first, between October and December of 2023, Lindsey was simply someone who had met Mr. Kearney online, chatted with him, and then begun to form a bond. Little did Ms. Gaetani realize, however, that, by virtue of a simple twist of fate, Kearney's pillow talk related to Karen Read and Josh Levy having direct contact, FBI agents, and civil rights probes of the State Police would put her directly in the middle of an unholy conflagration that was, on the night of December 23rd, 2023, about to take a turn that would change the course of history for an untold number of human lives. For, you see, in the weeks leading up to Christmas of 2023, the State Police discovered that Ms. Gaetani had information about Karen Read and TurtleBoy being in direct communication (along with information that Read and Josh Levy spoke directly). See those documents here - That, in turn, meant Ms. Gaetani was going to be forced to provide testimony at a Grand Jury scheduled for the week after Christmas (roughly December 26th, 2023). When Kearney found out this news, on or around December 22nd, it sent him into a tailspin (for good reason, it turns out, as what Mr. Kearney did next would, over time, lead to him being kicked out of Karen Read's inner circle and sent to jail...or, as Kearney says it, "...[that night] was a very expensive trip to [the city where Lindsey lives.]" Leveraging a very difficult time in Ms. Gaetani's life, Kearney demanded he be able to visit her, at home, late at night on December 23rd of 2023. Then, Kearney forced Gaetani to allow Kearney to review the contents of her phone (specifically her messages with Kate Peter) and take notes (using an ongoing medical situation that Gaetani was going through as leverage to get permission to do so). However, after Gaetani raised an objection to Kearney taking those notes, and after Gaetani retrieved her own notepad (that Kearney had used to take said notes) Kearney entirely lost his cool, pushed Gaetani onto a couch, and then began illegally recording her with his phone (an audio file Kearney would later try to edit in order to suggest Gaetani had consented to the recording, although that plan failed when a copy of the original recording, without the line about consent, was introduced into the court record). That, in turn, led to Kearney being criminally charged (again) with witness intimidation, illegal interception of an oral communication and assault and, as a result, a warrant to arrest (with probable cause) was issued. Kearney, after being a self-admitted "fugitive" from justice for multiple days with the warrant active, then turned himself in to authorities and was sent to jail after a Judge in Dedham district court revoked Kearney's bond as a result of the new charges involving Gaetani. See the post where Kearney admitted to being a fugitive here - See full coverage of the moment Kearney's bail was revoked here - In turn, Kearney then spent the next 60 days in jail (in protective custody, per my sources, because of his status as a federal informant) and, during that time, Kearney has confirmed that he would have been able to "walk free" if he "flipped" on Karen Read in the context of an ongoing conspiracy and witness intimidation probe into the pair of star-crossed attention seekers. However, Kearney did not do so and, in turn, was released from jail in late February of 2023 after serving the full 60 days on his bail revocation. For Ms. Read, however, a newly-leaked series of text messages confirm that, even thought Kearney stayed loyal and sent love-letters begging Read's forgiveness while locked up, the incident on the 23rd with Lindsey was Karen's red line and Kearney had been cut off from Read's inner circle. See that leaked text message (from March 3rd) here - Interestingly, on one of the first day's that TurtleBoy was out of jail (February 26th, 2024), I captured this fascinating moment where Karen clearly is uncomfortable around Kearney (she entirely ignores his presence outside of court and her lawyer, Alan Jackson, puts his arm on Karen's back to gently tug her away from Kearney as they walk by his hallowed-shell) - And, even more interestingly, it was also on the same day (2/26/24) that Lindsey Gaetani (under mysterious circumstances that, again, trace back to Kate Peter being shady) attended a court hearing, wherein, because of Gaetani's active restraining order on Kearney, Kearney was forced to leave the courtroom during Karen's case (and, on this same day, Kearney was also charged with a violation of that RO for hiding in the bushes outside of the court after being asked to leave the area by authorities). See video of that day here - However, sadly, I believe Gaetani's "usefulness" also quickly ended around this time as Kearney, within weeks, got his RO amended to allow TurtleBoy to attend any court hearing in the Commonwealth (even with Lindsey present) and, furthermore, the pressure tactics to get Kearney to "flip" on Karen Read had failed. Furthermore, because Karen was now in fear of TurtleBoy (having cut Aiden off), I believe Peter, Tully and the Norfolk DA took an entirely new direction. They would try to get Karen Read to cooperate regarding the ongoing investigations into TurtleBoy. This move, however, had unintended consequences (in particular for Lindsey Gaetani). In what I believe was a colloquial "crime of opportunity" -- and because Gaetani was no longer "useful" for the purposes of pressuring Kearney into a plea or for the purposes of keeping Kearney away from Karen Read hearings -- Kate Peter came up with a new idea: Kate, before knowing anyone else in the case, was connected with Jen McCabe (a witness in the Read trial who heard Karen confess to hitting John O'Keefe and who was tormented by TurtleBoy, for months, as a result of her willingness to testify on behalf of justice for John). Kate, also, had extensive connections to a network of Discord operatives who use fake profiles and hunt down bad people on the internet (again, a noble calling). However, I believe Kate weaponized some of those people (including someone named Father Mark Murphy, who used a fake profile called "The Jennings Report" and a parking clerk named Jason Broyles who moonlights as a woman online named "Hailey W.") to, in a last ditch effort now that Lindsey had no other use and because TurtleBoy could not be stopped, deflect the attention of TurtleBoy's fans (known as "TurtleRiders") away from Jen McCabe and onto --an unwitting and entirely innocent-- Lindsey Gaetani). What makes this even more shocking is that the way public attention was deflect onto Lindsey involved, what I believe, was an operation (run by Kate) to leak sensitive documents about Lindsey (along with other private information) to those fake profiles (including Jason Broyles, who Kate Peter has known since 2019). Interestingly, Broyles (and Murphy) began operations targeting Lindsey, and her support network/allies, right around the end of February, 2023 (and, interestingly, those accounts, for months, went out of their way to avoid mentioning Kate Peter or Jen McCabe, nearly entirely). Read more about the fake "Jennings Report" profile here - and read more about the disturbing tactics deployed by Jason Broyles here - and here - Anyway, that entire fiasco was the subtext (that I referenced in earlier posts) behind my question to Karen Read, in April of 2024, regarding whether Karen wanted to apologize to Lindsey for what was happening (as, by that point, Karen knew full well what it was like to become the target of Aiden's ire simply because Karen had cut him off). Karen may not have responded to my question, but she is a smart person (really, I don't mean that gratuitously: Read plays on a level I don't think most of us understand, and she does it by hiding in plain sight) and Karen knew exactly what I was talking about (she probably could have written this post herself, in fact, but she probably wouldn't have said as much about her gilt as to John's death). See video of me asking Karen that pointed question here - So, where does that leave us? Well: 1) In my view, Karen Read is vulnerable, concerned about what Aiden will do to her and her family, running out of money, and constantly at risk of having her conversations with TurtleBoy and other insiders (past and present leaked). Karen, after she loses her appeal at the SJC, is likely to look for a way to take a plea and cooperate against Aiden (Robert Cosgrove, the new special prosecutor in the Read/Kearney cases, and Hank Brennan, the new ADA in Read's murder trial, are serious legal heavy hitters and Read is in deep trouble, in my view). 2) Likewise, I think Brian Tully and Kate Peter are also deeply concerned because they didn't realize the FBI is, in reality, probably coming for them (and it has nothing to do with John O'Keefe's death, but instead it has everything to do with Kate and Tully's actions between the fall of 2023 and the summer/fall of 2024 and, also, probably Tully's actions in the context of the Sandra Birchmore investigation). I think this is why Peter is facing so many state-level criminal charges (despite trying to use her connections to get those cases to "go away" and, even in one case, managing to get the Norfolk DA not to recuse itself related to one of those charges, despite a special prosecutor being assigned to Peter's other criminal cases in the jurisdiction because of her connection to the State Police and the DA). 3) I think a lot of people are trying to keep Lindsey Gaetani and her story away from the media, and away from documentaries/podcasts that they do not control, in order to hide this information from the public, punish Lindsey for "knowing" Aiden, and insulate Peter and Brian Tully from accountability. I do not think this strategy is going to work because, and I cannot understate this enough, Lindsey is actually a genius (and none of you can see it, because you're blinded by greed, ego, jealously or otherwise). 4) I think, at the end of the day, Karen Read killed John O'Keefe, while Karen was drunk driving, at 12:31am on 1/29/22 by hitting John with her SUV and then leaving John to die. In turn, I think Karen was mad that people "flipped on her" related to Karen's actions that night, and, in turn, Karen leveraged her political connections (which I don't fully understand, but which I think are based in the intelligence community) to "punish" the Norfolk DA and the State Police Troopers who uncovered said evidence of Karen's guilt. Little did Karen realize, all the way back in November of 2022, that she had stumbled onto overlapping social circles of power that, when the dust settles, would have been consumed by their hubris --and wanton disregard for the memory of John O'Keefe-- regardless. "Remember," dear friends and readers, "it's about Justice For John." I'm a towel, and that's what I think happened (as of November, 2024). Usual disclaimer: I am a towel, not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. You are reading social media. Get a lawyer if you have questions about the law.
4:52

Good morning. In November of 2024, I laid out why Brian Tully, Kate Peter, and Jason Broyles leaked an unredacted 15-year extraction of Lindsey Gaetani's phone. I didn't want the world to listen to me. I wanted someone, somewhere, to protect Lindsey. I can finally breathe. Here is the full text of my report (that now has 700,000 views); Okay, fine, as a special treat (on this, the day of oral arguments in the #KarenReadTrial appeal), I will lay out some of what I am thinking as to the timeline of events between August of 2023 and the spring of 2024. You are going to get a lot of inside information in this post. You have been warned. In the fall of 2023, via a woman named Natalie (who was friends with Karen Read and enjoyed talking about houseplants with Karen), I believe the Commonwealth of Massachusetts came to be in possession of evidence indicating that Read and blogger Aiden Turtle Boy Kearney were conspiring to intimidate witnesses in Read's ongoing criminal trial related to the murder of John O'Keefe. See the evidence of that contact (which started in April/May of 2023 --because of Natalie-- and occurred directly with Read and via Read's lawyers, David Yannetti and Alan Jackson) here - As a result of this information being uncovered, I believe the Commonwealth then began targeting Mr. Kearney with criminal charges related to witness intimidation in the context of Read's criminal trial (Kearney had been organizing, with Read's help, rallies at the homes of witnesses in the case and running smear campaigns to poison the jury pool in the lead up to Read's trial). I believe the intent of this targeting was multifaceted but, primarily, involved the following: 1) Getting Kearney to stop his abhorrent behavior related to witnesses in Read's case (which included, in some cases, Kearney's followers putting semen on pictures of witnesses' children and then sending those pictures to said witnesses, as explained here - 2) Placing criminal charges on Kearney in an effort to pressure him to "flip" on Karen Read and, in turn, testify that Read did, indeed, order the witness intimidation in question via a conspiracy. Kearney, when he was eventually jailed in late 2023/early 2024, confirmed that such an offer was presented while he was incarcerated. 3) Getting information for the Massachusetts State Police, and the Norfolk District Attorney, as to the nature of an ongoing federal probe into the conduct of those departments (an investigation which, in time, it turns out had moved on from investigating John O'Keefe's death and, in turn, evolved into a probe of a potential cover-up of the death of Sandra Birchmore). Read more background on that complex situation --involving two Troopers assigned to the Norfolk DA, who also worked on the Read case, that signed off on a "misleading" state-level police report into Matthew Farwell-- here - At the same time, and in furtherance of those investigatory activities, I believe the State Police began working directly with a former colleague of Aiden Kearney, a woman named Kate Peter AKA MafiaMasshole who has a small online cult following related to humiliating First Amendment Auditors (which, admittedly, is noble work). What may have not been so noble (along with Peter taking cash in a Chick-Fil-A parking lot for her "efforts" on behalf of some wealthy witnesses in the Read trial), however, is that --as Mr. Kearney became the subject of police investigations related to the aforementioned witness intimidation-- the Norfolk DA announced to the public that a Special Prosecutor would be appointed to oversee those charges (because of the numerous allegations of corruption that Kearney had made towards the DA in public). That Special Prosecutor, Ken Mello, was nonetheless assigned to work with the same State Police Trooper (Brian Tully) who worked on the Read case and who reported directly to the Norfolk DA at the time. And, furthermore, I believe the State Police and the Norfolk DA, via Brian Tully, also around this time (fall of 2023) began working directly with Kate Peter (who, for some time, was working for a Private Investigations firm with ties to a number of figures in the orbit of the Read case) in order to obtain evidence against Mr. Kearney, seek out and catalog information from sources close to Mr. Kearney and, in some cases, even help draft parts of Mr. Kearney's eventually October, 2023, criminal indictment. However, what I think the State Police (and the Norfolk DA) did not know at the time was that Aiden Kearney was working as a confidential federal informant, specifically looking into allegations of civil rights violations against said State Police, since at least May of 2023. Furthermore, I also think the State Police were not aware that it was Karen Read's lawyers, Alan Jackson and David Yannetti, who had the necessary connections in order to help Kearney obtain that status. Read more here - That said, at the same time, when Kearney was initially brought on by the federal government in May of 2023, in my view, I don't think the DOJ was finished looking into the death of John O'Keefe. In fact, I think the DOJ pulled out an old FBI tactic (which I can confirm exists) and, after the US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts wrapped-up the O'Keefe probe in the fall of 2023, Kearney was encouraged by the FBI to use his coverage of the Read case to generate leads related to other misconduct by the State Police unit attached to the Norfolk DA (in particular Brian Tully). Read more about that FBI playbook here - Indeed, that timeline perfectly synchs with a recent announcement by US Attorney Josh Levy indicating that the federal probe of Sandra Birchmore's death began in, roughly, August of 2023. See more background on Birchmore's tragic life and death here - Nonetheless, because of Kearney's ongoing work for the federal government in the fall of 2023, and because the State Police did not realize this was happening (although they should have been able to put it together, because Kate Peter and Kevin from Yellow Cottage Tails for sure knew, as early as May of 2023, that FBI agents were calling around, on behalf of Kearney, related to ongoing criminal cases entirely removed from the Read trial) I believe said State Police, stupidly, committed some of the very civil rights violations that the FBI was looking for. I believe the State Police did this, in particular Brian Tully, by way of his relationship to Kate Peter. [Side note: I will always remember talking to Kate, over winter and spring of 2024, and explaining my firm belief that Aiden Kearney was an FBI agent. Peter simply could not come to terms with that reality, despite having been the person who called the FBI back in May in order to confirm the agency was poking around some of Kearney's criminal cases, and, in that moment, I knew that pride was, indeed, about to cometh before her fall.] And, indeed, I also think Karen Read, herself, was well aware that the federal probe into John's death had ended in the fall of 2023 (for the most part) and that, in turn, the feds were going to move on to other serious allegations of corruption related to Tully and his unit at the State Police. However, for many reasons, I think Karen was happy to let the FBI (and TurtleBoy) use her trial as "cover" to get more information, and leads, related to said Troopers (this was, after all, the very same unit that had investigated Read and mocked her with horrifying language during that process). [Also, another side note, there is an intense history of tension between the Norfolk DA's office and the DOJ in Boston which dates back to the 1990's and William Delahunt, but which, in reality, really heated up during a 2015 mob trial.] Basically, there is a connection between Josh Levy (Acting US Attorney For District of Massachusetts) + Karen Read (accused murderer) + Dustin Chao (head of Boston DOJ's Public Integrity Section) + David Yannetti (lawyer for accused murderer Karen Read) + Rachael Rollins (former Suffolk County DA, and US Attorney for the district of Massachusetts, until Spring of 2023, who was also Josh Levy's boss in November of 2022 and who previously had direct contact with Read's lawyer, Mr. Yannetti) + Aiden TurtleBoy Kearney (blogger indicted with 19 felonies in relation to targeting witnesses in the Read case, until he was thrown out of Read's inner circle for exposing Read's connection to Acting US Attorney Levy). Chao (aforementioned head of the DOJ Boston's Public Integrity Section) had a grudge to use whatever means necessary take down the Norfolk DA since 2015 (After Chao's wife was passed over for a promotion and left that DA's office on bad terms) and, in turn, the proxy-battle behind all of this chaos becomes a bit more clear. Read the primary source documents laying all of this out here - and here - That said, I think there one was wild-card who came into the picture between October of 2023 that no one (be it Kate Peter, the FBI, the DOJ, the State Police, Aiden Kearney or otherwise) expected, and her name is Lindsey Gaetani. At first, between October and December of 2023, Lindsey was simply someone who had met Mr. Kearney online, chatted with him, and then begun to form a bond. Little did Ms. Gaetani realize, however, that, by virtue of a simple twist of fate, Kearney's pillow talk related to Karen Read and Josh Levy having direct contact, FBI agents, and civil rights probes of the State Police would put her directly in the middle of an unholy conflagration that was, on the night of December 23rd, 2023, about to take a turn that would change the course of history for an untold number of human lives. For, you see, in the weeks leading up to Christmas of 2023, the State Police discovered that Ms. Gaetani had information about Karen Read and TurtleBoy being in direct communication (along with information that Read and Josh Levy spoke directly). See those documents here - That, in turn, meant Ms. Gaetani was going to be forced to provide testimony at a Grand Jury scheduled for the week after Christmas (roughly December 26th, 2023). When Kearney found out this news, on or around December 22nd, it sent him into a tailspin (for good reason, it turns out, as what Mr. Kearney did next would, over time, lead to him being kicked out of Karen Read's inner circle and sent to jail...or, as Kearney says it, "...[that night] was a very expensive trip to [the city where Lindsey lives.]" Leveraging a very difficult time in Ms. Gaetani's life, Kearney demanded he be able to visit her, at home, late at night on December 23rd of 2023. Then, Kearney forced Gaetani to allow Kearney to review the contents of her phone (specifically her messages with Kate Peter) and take notes (using an ongoing medical situation that Gaetani was going through as leverage to get permission to do so). However, after Gaetani raised an objection to Kearney taking those notes, and after Gaetani retrieved her own notepad (that Kearney had used to take said notes) Kearney entirely lost his cool, pushed Gaetani onto a couch, and then began illegally recording her with his phone (an audio file Kearney would later try to edit in order to suggest Gaetani had consented to the recording, although that plan failed when a copy of the original recording, without the line about consent, was introduced into the court record). That, in turn, led to Kearney being criminally charged (again) with witness intimidation, illegal interception of an oral communication and assault and, as a result, a warrant to arrest (with probable cause) was issued. Kearney, after being a self-admitted "fugitive" from justice for multiple days with the warrant active, then turned himself in to authorities and was sent to jail after a Judge in Dedham district court revoked Kearney's bond as a result of the new charges involving Gaetani. See the post where Kearney admitted to being a fugitive here - See full coverage of the moment Kearney's bail was revoked here - In turn, Kearney then spent the next 60 days in jail (in protective custody, per my sources, because of his status as a federal informant) and, during that time, Kearney has confirmed that he would have been able to "walk free" if he "flipped" on Karen Read in the context of an ongoing conspiracy and witness intimidation probe into the pair of star-crossed attention seekers. However, Kearney did not do so and, in turn, was released from jail in late February of 2023 after serving the full 60 days on his bail revocation. For Ms. Read, however, a newly-leaked series of text messages confirm that, even thought Kearney stayed loyal and sent love-letters begging Read's forgiveness while locked up, the incident on the 23rd with Lindsey was Karen's red line and Kearney had been cut off from Read's inner circle. See that leaked text message (from March 3rd) here - Interestingly, on one of the first day's that TurtleBoy was out of jail (February 26th, 2024), I captured this fascinating moment where Karen clearly is uncomfortable around Kearney (she entirely ignores his presence outside of court and her lawyer, Alan Jackson, puts his arm on Karen's back to gently tug her away from Kearney as they walk by his hallowed-shell) - And, even more interestingly, it was also on the same day (2/26/24) that Lindsey Gaetani (under mysterious circumstances that, again, trace back to Kate Peter being shady) attended a court hearing, wherein, because of Gaetani's active restraining order on Kearney, Kearney was forced to leave the courtroom during Karen's case (and, on this same day, Kearney was also charged with a violation of that RO for hiding in the bushes outside of the court after being asked to leave the area by authorities). See video of that day here - However, sadly, I believe Gaetani's "usefulness" also quickly ended around this time as Kearney, within weeks, got his RO amended to allow TurtleBoy to attend any court hearing in the Commonwealth (even with Lindsey present) and, furthermore, the pressure tactics to get Kearney to "flip" on Karen Read had failed. Furthermore, because Karen was now in fear of TurtleBoy (having cut Aiden off), I believe Peter, Tully and the Norfolk DA took an entirely new direction. They would try to get Karen Read to cooperate regarding the ongoing investigations into TurtleBoy. This move, however, had unintended consequences (in particular for Lindsey Gaetani). In what I believe was a colloquial "crime of opportunity" -- and because Gaetani was no longer "useful" for the purposes of pressuring Kearney into a plea or for the purposes of keeping Kearney away from Karen Read hearings -- Kate Peter came up with a new idea: Kate, before knowing anyone else in the case, was connected with Jen McCabe (a witness in the Read trial who heard Karen confess to hitting John O'Keefe and who was tormented by TurtleBoy, for months, as a result of her willingness to testify on behalf of justice for John). Kate, also, had extensive connections to a network of Discord operatives who use fake profiles and hunt down bad people on the internet (again, a noble calling). However, I believe Kate weaponized some of those people (including someone named Father Mark Murphy, who used a fake profile called "The Jennings Report" and a parking clerk named Jason Broyles who moonlights as a woman online named "Hailey W.") to, in a last ditch effort now that Lindsey had no other use and because TurtleBoy could not be stopped, deflect the attention of TurtleBoy's fans (known as "TurtleRiders") away from Jen McCabe and onto --an unwitting and entirely innocent-- Lindsey Gaetani). What makes this even more shocking is that the way public attention was deflect onto Lindsey involved, what I believe, was an operation (run by Kate) to leak sensitive documents about Lindsey (along with other private information) to those fake profiles (including Jason Broyles, who Kate Peter has known since 2019). Interestingly, Broyles (and Murphy) began operations targeting Lindsey, and her support network/allies, right around the end of February, 2023 (and, interestingly, those accounts, for months, went out of their way to avoid mentioning Kate Peter or Jen McCabe, nearly entirely). Read more about the fake "Jennings Report" profile here - and read more about the disturbing tactics deployed by Jason Broyles here - and here - Anyway, that entire fiasco was the subtext (that I referenced in earlier posts) behind my question to Karen Read, in April of 2024, regarding whether Karen wanted to apologize to Lindsey for what was happening (as, by that point, Karen knew full well what it was like to become the target of Aiden's ire simply because Karen had cut him off). Karen may not have responded to my question, but she is a smart person (really, I don't mean that gratuitously: Read plays on a level I don't think most of us understand, and she does it by hiding in plain sight) and Karen knew exactly what I was talking about (she probably could have written this post herself, in fact, but she probably wouldn't have said as much about her gilt as to John's death). See video of me asking Karen that pointed question here - So, where does that leave us? Well: 1) In my view, Karen Read is vulnerable, concerned about what Aiden will do to her and her family, running out of money, and constantly at risk of having her conversations with TurtleBoy and other insiders (past and present leaked). Karen, after she loses her appeal at the SJC, is likely to look for a way to take a plea and cooperate against Aiden (Robert Cosgrove, the new special prosecutor in the Read/Kearney cases, and Hank Brennan, the new ADA in Read's murder trial, are serious legal heavy hitters and Read is in deep trouble, in my view). 2) Likewise, I think Brian Tully and Kate Peter are also deeply concerned because they didn't realize the FBI is, in reality, probably coming for them (and it has nothing to do with John O'Keefe's death, but instead it has everything to do with Kate and Tully's actions between the fall of 2023 and the summer/fall of 2024 and, also, probably Tully's actions in the context of the Sandra Birchmore investigation). I think this is why Peter is facing so many state-level criminal charges (despite trying to use her connections to get those cases to "go away" and, even in one case, managing to get the Norfolk DA not to recuse itself related to one of those charges, despite a special prosecutor being assigned to Peter's other criminal cases in the jurisdiction because of her connection to the State Police and the DA). 3) I think a lot of people are trying to keep Lindsey Gaetani and her story away from the media, and away from documentaries/podcasts that they do not control, in order to hide this information from the public, punish Lindsey for "knowing" Aiden, and insulate Peter and Brian Tully from accountability. I do not think this strategy is going to work because, and I cannot understate this enough, Lindsey is actually a genius (and none of you can see it, because you're blinded by greed, ego, jealously or otherwise). 4) I think, at the end of the day, Karen Read killed John O'Keefe, while Karen was drunk driving, at 12:31am on 1/29/22 by hitting John with her SUV and then leaving John to die. In turn, I think Karen was mad that people "flipped on her" related to Karen's actions that night, and, in turn, Karen leveraged her political connections (which I don't fully understand, but which I think are based in the intelligence community) to "punish" the Norfolk DA and the State Police Troopers who uncovered said evidence of Karen's guilt. Little did Karen realize, all the way back in November of 2022, that she had stumbled onto overlapping social circles of power that, when the dust settles, would have been consumed by their hubris --and wanton disregard for the memory of John O'Keefe-- regardless. "Remember," dear friends and readers, "it's about Justice For John." I'm a towel, and that's what I think happened (as of November, 2024). Usual disclaimer: I am a towel, not a lawyer. This is not legal advice. You are reading social media. Get a lawyer if you have questions about the law.

Grant Smith Ellis

28,671 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 1 Jahr

They Seriously Expected Parades And Trophies For Pausing A Genocide Iโ€™ve seen a lot of empire loyalists going โ€œWhy arenโ€™t the Free Palestine people cheering about the ceasefire?โ€ If you saw a man beating a child into a coma, would you cheer after the beating stopped? No, your first reaction would be horror at what happened and your second would be fear that heโ€™ll attack the kid again. And then at some point youโ€™d start wondering why the guy isnโ€™t in jail. They actually expected a bunch of parades and trophies for pausing a genocide. They thought theyโ€™d get applause and adoration and then everything would go back to how it was pre-2023. Thatโ€™s adorable. Thatโ€™s precious. Not gonna happen, but itโ€™s cute that they thought it would. โ– Drop Site News reports that after the ceasefire was announced Israeli troops went on an arson spree and torched food, homes and critical infrastructure to ensure that Palestinians would have nothing to return to. I keep thinking the Israeli military has run out of ways to shock me, but they somehow keep finding new ones. โ– TYTโ€™s Ana Kasparian was in hot water last week for rubbing her hands together while talking about how creepy and evil Jewish oligarch Larry Ellison is, with critics hastening to compare her depiction of Ellison to the antisemitic โ€œHappy Merchantโ€ meme. Online Zionists eager to stoke the antisemitism hysteria actually went out of their way to digitally insert the Happy Merchant meme into the actual footage of Kasparianโ€™s portrayal, which was probably done to show the similarities between the portrayal and the meme but in practice made it look as though TYT had displayed an antisemitic graphic during their show. There is no reason to believe Kasparian was being antisemitic with her portrayal of Ellison, who is indeed creepy and evil. Ask a small child to imitate someone who is wicked and sneaky and theyโ€™ll rub their hands together looking sinister in the exact way Kasparian did without knowing anything about Jews or Judaism. The only reason anyone felt the need to insert the Happy Merchant meme into the footage in the first place was because hardly anyone knows what the fuck that is. This has gotten so fucking stupid. You canโ€™t even talk like a normal person in real time without getting accused of doing an antisemitic trope. Nobody can keep track of every little thing on the ADL no-no list. These freaks were accusing Greta Thunberg of being a Nazi for taking a pro-Palestine photo with an octopus plushie, because apparently octopuses are somewhere on the no-no list. Youโ€™re expected to tip toe around and avoid any reference to money, noses, blood, and who knows whatever the fuck else. Penguins? Poodles? IKEA furniture? No one knows. Nobody can keep track of all that shit, especially when speaking in a real-time format and you donโ€™t have time to pause and research whether a certain normal hand gesture is on the antisemitic trope list. Itโ€™s an absurd dynamic designed to stagnate all conversation around criticisms of genocide, empire, and oligarchy. โ– I got into an interaction with someone online who told me I should hate Hamas because they are a proscribed terrorist group. I said โ€œOh well if the GOVERNMENT says we have to hate Hamas then I stand corrected.โ€ He said it had nothing to do with the government, arguing that it was just โ€œcommon sense,โ€ after literally just having cited the proscription of Hamas by his government. Itโ€™s amazing how common this viewpoint is. Westerners actually think โ€œterroristโ€ is some kind of innate quality that certain groups have, instead of a completely made-up designation imposed by specific governments. They donโ€™t understand that itโ€™s a government-applied label; they think itโ€™s something that those groups actually ARE. Theyโ€™re so herd-like in their thinking that they actually allow their rulers to interpret reality on their behalf. And they donโ€™t even know theyโ€™re doing it. The overwhelming majority of the worldโ€™s governments do not consider Hamas a terrorist group. Itโ€™s a label thatโ€™s only applied by the Five Eyes states, the EU, Japan, a couple of the empireโ€™s Latin American client states, and Israel. For everyone else itโ€™s just a Palestinian armed resistance group. In the US-centralized empire, โ€œterroristโ€ just means โ€œa population which poses an inconvenience to the interests of the empireโ€. Itโ€™s not a real thing. The UK designated Palestine Action a terrorist group because its activists put paint on some war planes to protest a genocide, while an actual, literal Al Qaeda leader has been warmly embraced by western states because he facilitated their regime change objectives in Syria. There are no consistent standards by which Iranโ€™s IRGC should be considered a terrorist group while Israelโ€™s IDF and Mossad should not. Anyone who regurgitates the word โ€œterroristโ€ is just telling you theyโ€™re a mindless and compliant empire drone. โ– The Gaza holocaust will be a litmus test for high-profile figures for decades. Everyoneโ€™s comments or lack thereof on Israelโ€™s genocidal atrocities will be looked up and amplified whenever their name rises to public attention. It will be the first step in determining whether anyone deserves to be listened to, taken seriously, or voted for. Their comments on Gaza in the mid-2020s will be the first gate through which they must pass to be considered worthy of attention by normal people. โ– Someone asked me, โ€œWhy do you care so much about Palestine?โ€ I told them ultimately itโ€™s not even especially about Palestine. I care about humanity. I donโ€™t want my kids and grandkids living in the kind of world that would watch civilians get ripped to shreds in full view of the entire planet with the support of my government and its allies. I think thatโ€™s pretty reasonable. โ– Reading by Tim Foley:
6:36

They Seriously Expected Parades And Trophies For Pausing A Genocide Iโ€™ve seen a lot of empire loyalists going โ€œWhy arenโ€™t the Free Palestine people cheering about the ceasefire?โ€ If you saw a man beating a child into a coma, would you cheer after the beating stopped? No, your first reaction would be horror at what happened and your second would be fear that heโ€™ll attack the kid again. And then at some point youโ€™d start wondering why the guy isnโ€™t in jail. They actually expected a bunch of parades and trophies for pausing a genocide. They thought theyโ€™d get applause and adoration and then everything would go back to how it was pre-2023. Thatโ€™s adorable. Thatโ€™s precious. Not gonna happen, but itโ€™s cute that they thought it would. โ– Drop Site News reports that after the ceasefire was announced Israeli troops went on an arson spree and torched food, homes and critical infrastructure to ensure that Palestinians would have nothing to return to. I keep thinking the Israeli military has run out of ways to shock me, but they somehow keep finding new ones. โ– TYTโ€™s Ana Kasparian was in hot water last week for rubbing her hands together while talking about how creepy and evil Jewish oligarch Larry Ellison is, with critics hastening to compare her depiction of Ellison to the antisemitic โ€œHappy Merchantโ€ meme. Online Zionists eager to stoke the antisemitism hysteria actually went out of their way to digitally insert the Happy Merchant meme into the actual footage of Kasparianโ€™s portrayal, which was probably done to show the similarities between the portrayal and the meme but in practice made it look as though TYT had displayed an antisemitic graphic during their show. There is no reason to believe Kasparian was being antisemitic with her portrayal of Ellison, who is indeed creepy and evil. Ask a small child to imitate someone who is wicked and sneaky and theyโ€™ll rub their hands together looking sinister in the exact way Kasparian did without knowing anything about Jews or Judaism. The only reason anyone felt the need to insert the Happy Merchant meme into the footage in the first place was because hardly anyone knows what the fuck that is. This has gotten so fucking stupid. You canโ€™t even talk like a normal person in real time without getting accused of doing an antisemitic trope. Nobody can keep track of every little thing on the ADL no-no list. These freaks were accusing Greta Thunberg of being a Nazi for taking a pro-Palestine photo with an octopus plushie, because apparently octopuses are somewhere on the no-no list. Youโ€™re expected to tip toe around and avoid any reference to money, noses, blood, and who knows whatever the fuck else. Penguins? Poodles? IKEA furniture? No one knows. Nobody can keep track of all that shit, especially when speaking in a real-time format and you donโ€™t have time to pause and research whether a certain normal hand gesture is on the antisemitic trope list. Itโ€™s an absurd dynamic designed to stagnate all conversation around criticisms of genocide, empire, and oligarchy. โ– I got into an interaction with someone online who told me I should hate Hamas because they are a proscribed terrorist group. I said โ€œOh well if the GOVERNMENT says we have to hate Hamas then I stand corrected.โ€ He said it had nothing to do with the government, arguing that it was just โ€œcommon sense,โ€ after literally just having cited the proscription of Hamas by his government. Itโ€™s amazing how common this viewpoint is. Westerners actually think โ€œterroristโ€ is some kind of innate quality that certain groups have, instead of a completely made-up designation imposed by specific governments. They donโ€™t understand that itโ€™s a government-applied label; they think itโ€™s something that those groups actually ARE. Theyโ€™re so herd-like in their thinking that they actually allow their rulers to interpret reality on their behalf. And they donโ€™t even know theyโ€™re doing it. The overwhelming majority of the worldโ€™s governments do not consider Hamas a terrorist group. Itโ€™s a label thatโ€™s only applied by the Five Eyes states, the EU, Japan, a couple of the empireโ€™s Latin American client states, and Israel. For everyone else itโ€™s just a Palestinian armed resistance group. In the US-centralized empire, โ€œterroristโ€ just means โ€œa population which poses an inconvenience to the interests of the empireโ€. Itโ€™s not a real thing. The UK designated Palestine Action a terrorist group because its activists put paint on some war planes to protest a genocide, while an actual, literal Al Qaeda leader has been warmly embraced by western states because he facilitated their regime change objectives in Syria. There are no consistent standards by which Iranโ€™s IRGC should be considered a terrorist group while Israelโ€™s IDF and Mossad should not. Anyone who regurgitates the word โ€œterroristโ€ is just telling you theyโ€™re a mindless and compliant empire drone. โ– The Gaza holocaust will be a litmus test for high-profile figures for decades. Everyoneโ€™s comments or lack thereof on Israelโ€™s genocidal atrocities will be looked up and amplified whenever their name rises to public attention. It will be the first step in determining whether anyone deserves to be listened to, taken seriously, or voted for. Their comments on Gaza in the mid-2020s will be the first gate through which they must pass to be considered worthy of attention by normal people. โ– Someone asked me, โ€œWhy do you care so much about Palestine?โ€ I told them ultimately itโ€™s not even especially about Palestine. I care about humanity. I donโ€™t want my kids and grandkids living in the kind of world that would watch civilians get ripped to shreds in full view of the entire planet with the support of my government and its allies. I think thatโ€™s pretty reasonable. โ– Reading by Tim Foley:

Caitlin Johnstone

47,444 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 10 Monaten

Moneytaur study blueprint ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ The process I used to go from not knowing what an order block is to pulling cash from the crypto markets in under 6 months using ๐ŸŽฏ Master concepts. Proof of performance, past 120 days๐Ÿ‘‡ Start date: 09/03/2025 Requirements: - A PC/laptop - Wifi - A basic understanding of trading. ( What candlesticks are, how to actually place trades , etc ) - A free mind - Time or the ability to free up time. Starting: - Structure and routine - Stick to that routine + Pre mortem plan. - Notion / Obsidian setup. The first thing you need to create is a clear routine moulded around how you intend to approach this very large and complex task. This will not be linear and you will naturally adapt it as you progress but especially in the beginning some resemblance of structure each day is vital. This is an individual process but it is important to understand from the beginning that this will require a majority of your free time assuming you work a full time Job or study as a student. For me in the beginning this looked like: - Wake up at 6:30. - Shower - Study/work for 1h 45m before leaving for work. - 09:00 -> 17:00 work - 17:30 Exercise / Train - Eat - 19:00 resume study/work - 22:30 Start to wind down and get ready to sleep. It changed several times over the months and especially now I am full time but this is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is sticking with what you choose. Whatever your own routine may look like, it is important to understand it will inevitably require sacrifice. --- The next thing once you have established a draft framework of your routine is ensuring you will actually stick to that routine. Something I implemented which I found particularly beneficial was the concept of a Pre-Mortem plan. This involves creating several scenarios of a future in which you have failed and working backwards from each of these to find where it went wrong. Here is a video which explains it fully: When I did this I came up with 3 scenarios as well as prevention and cure for each. In the 6 months that followed each scenario presented at some point but I was able to catch them early due to having done this. The last thing is to not over complicate this, don't hyper focus on systems and loose momentum optimizing each detail. Just ensure you do the fucking work. I was a little guilty of the above at times, trying to craft the perfect routine. In reality the person who just gets up, drinks too much coffee and works his ass off out performs the workflow perfectionist who visualizes and repeats affirmations, any day of the week. --- Next you need somewhere to store your notes, journal your trades and build your knowledge. For me this was Obsidian but I have also used Notion before and it is an equally viable option. Whichever one of these you choose be warned you will inevitably want to bang your head against a wall trying to use them for the first few days, but they will both click pretty quick and are 100% better options the word document or paper alternative. Here is my full obsidian setup tutorial: Here is a link to MisterPA 's notion Journal: Here is how I create "Meta-Notes" using obsidian: The process: - How I did it. - How I would do it if doing it again. Now I did things the "hard way" and manually worked my way back through each of MT's tweets starting in 2021, reading every one and logging those that I felt where relevant. You can see in my first post: the very first system I used to do this. I quickly adapted though after about a week and focused less on just logging each relevant tweet but trying to find and focusing on those which contained the most information. There where a lot of charts I looked at then skipped over because especially at the start of his timeline they contained little useful information and my time was better spent finding those where there was something to decode. Now this does not mean skip out on "work" just use your time efficiently. -- If however if I was to start from the beginning again with the goal of levelling up technical understanding as quickly as possible I would take a different approach. To start with I would familiarise myself with all relevant SMC concepts, I have linked the best free recourses for this below ๐Ÿ‘‡ CryptoChase beginner friendly index: Barncore's "The Moneytaur Way" series: Gian's Trading bootcamp playlist: Following this I would then work through all of Taur's subscription posts working backwards, recreating his charts and taking notes on his logic. The subscription feed has the highest value density and least noise. Video example of my notes from his subscription posts ๐Ÿ‘‡: --- Okay so now once you have a basic understanding of concepts and can re-recreate them on charts of your own it is time to put this in to practice. The next step is vigorous backtesting, you can use the trading view tool but I think trade Zella offers a more use friendly option if you pay for the subscription. Especially as it allows you to change timeframes without skipping ahead to candle close time of the timeframe you change too ( like Trading view does ) *my only note would be that their LTF/Micro TF data feed with be different to brokerage charts you will use on Trading view, to start with though you should not be going low enough that this is an issue. When you backtest in this context, treat it like real trading. That means journal and logging like you would if real cash was on the line. Take time, do not rush and focus on quality. Stick to BTC, ETH, Major FX pairs or indices as these assets are less reliant on confluence, backtesting a shitcoin is near useless as whether levels work or not will be highly dependent on Majors PA. Go on HTF, scroll back a couple years and try not too look at chart while doing so and then begin. Start with HTF analysis and work down to 2H or wherever you feel comfortable, chart it fully and then identify setups. Make rough notes / plans and then press play, execute the setups as they hit, log and journal trade management as well as observations and key notes. It is very important to not cheat when you do this, do not skip back and adjust your stoploss because it hit by 0.1%, do not skip back and adjust plan because you missed a block and your TP got frontrun. Instead these are the things you journal, embrace these mistakes because they are the cheapest mistakes you are going to make. Grind this, do it for hours, put some music on and enjoy. To start with focus on HTF's, as you get better and start netting $ on paper you can drop the timeframes and increase the difficulty. HTF = Normal, MTF = Medium, LTF = Hard. Even if you do not intend to day trade, learning how to read the lower TF's that force you to think faster, harder and prepare you for lower win rates / loss streaks can greatly improve your ability on higher TF's. While you are doing this as you start to have concepts click you now want to build up your real trading experience, take a sum of money that you care about but will be okay loosing and dedicate this to live trading. Start taking real trades and expect net losses in the beginning. This is where you will make you 2nd cheapest mistakes. This is also where you can begin to learn about your psychology. You may encounter some elements already in backtesting but the real market is where true colours really start to show. Mental issues are inevitable and part of the game, get used to them and start working to identify and fix them. Reading and applying books like Trading in the Zone and Mental Game of Trading are important and will help a lot but there is no easy fix, for some stuff you I believe you just have to get used to it and it goes away with experience. Losses suck at the beginning but after you loose 100 times you starting getting pretty numb to it, same goes for the winners. To accelerate the learning process, build connections and get advice there is also always the option of private groups, while I never personally chose this route and committed to learning everything through my own endeavours there is no denying that having nearly all the information you need structured and compiled in one place is valuable and can save time. Beyond this having access to real time thoughts and opinions of profitable traders can accelerate performance, however it carries the risk of being a double edged sword if not used properly, if relying on it like a crutch and using it as a substitute for real work you will not succeed. With that said if you take it for what it is, a learning opportunity then I believe it can be very beneficial. I am not a member of, nor affiliated with any paid group. There are now many options available within the community, all run by different people with different styles, tailored to different needs. If I was to make a recommendation though, as a non-member, it would be Albert & Co's 618'ers simply due to the diversity in styles of the traders running it and results I have seen from members I know personally. It is important that as you start to trade with real capital you reduce noise in your social feeds or eliminate it all together. You do not need 5 different opinions, you also do not need 2 people telling you the same thing in their own way so you feel re-assured. What you do need is to develop your independent thinking as a trader and be comfortable making different decisions to others, even traders ahead of yourself if it fits with your system or understanding of market. Taur here is perhaps an exception as this is who you are learning from but down the line a real test of your own ability and independence will be being able to stick with your own plan even when it differs from his. Don't get me wrong, counter trading him is retarded but you must learn to adapt his gift to your own style. This will make sense at some point. The next stage is taking your understanding of specific concepts to higher level as you simultaneously snowball experience. Look back through your journal and review where you lost money and made money, do not over extrapolate from a small sample but start to take notes and observe if trends in performance emerge. This is the beginning of the transition to self reliance, you now understand the strategy but must learn for yourself when and where it works. Here you can also learn more nuanced secondary concepts such as VSA, orderflow etc and add these to your game where appropriate. Do NOT get lost in the sauce though and remember mastery of basics is key. IMO a big focus should be understanding correlation thoroughly but especially on HTF's this is the most important thing and what triggers the majority of large swings where most of your cash will be made and losses recovered. Some people will disagree with me here but IMO you should also not be *focusing* on Odd TF's. These are secondary at best and most people overweight their significance leading to avoidable losses while wondering why price did not care about their 327minute Breaker Block which they think is the key to the market. Study Taurs feed and take note of how he mostly uses: 3M, 1M, 3W, 2W, 1W, 5D, 4D, 3D, 2D, 1D, 12H, 8H, 6H, 4H, 2H, 1H, 30m, 15m + micro time frames. The only thing left is time and repetition, you must show up each day and really do this, for months. Maybe you start to see result's, you catch your first key swing and where able to trade where others froze. Congratulations. Learn from these winners and repeat the actions. Find what assets work best for you, find your style, refine and grow. --- The last thing I will include is a short list of tools or links that can be helpful. - Trading view tutorial: - Dictionary: - Market news Calendar: --- Thank you too all those who have read this, I hope this has been helpful for the beginners who want to start but are just not sure how. ๐Ÿซถ Don't just bookmark this and move on, start ๐Ÿ™ƒ
0:38

Moneytaur study blueprint ๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ The process I used to go from not knowing what an order block is to pulling cash from the crypto markets in under 6 months using ๐ŸŽฏ Master concepts. Proof of performance, past 120 days๐Ÿ‘‡ Start date: 09/03/2025 Requirements: - A PC/laptop - Wifi - A basic understanding of trading. ( What candlesticks are, how to actually place trades , etc ) - A free mind - Time or the ability to free up time. Starting: - Structure and routine - Stick to that routine + Pre mortem plan. - Notion / Obsidian setup. The first thing you need to create is a clear routine moulded around how you intend to approach this very large and complex task. This will not be linear and you will naturally adapt it as you progress but especially in the beginning some resemblance of structure each day is vital. This is an individual process but it is important to understand from the beginning that this will require a majority of your free time assuming you work a full time Job or study as a student. For me in the beginning this looked like: - Wake up at 6:30. - Shower - Study/work for 1h 45m before leaving for work. - 09:00 -> 17:00 work - 17:30 Exercise / Train - Eat - 19:00 resume study/work - 22:30 Start to wind down and get ready to sleep. It changed several times over the months and especially now I am full time but this is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is sticking with what you choose. Whatever your own routine may look like, it is important to understand it will inevitably require sacrifice. --- The next thing once you have established a draft framework of your routine is ensuring you will actually stick to that routine. Something I implemented which I found particularly beneficial was the concept of a Pre-Mortem plan. This involves creating several scenarios of a future in which you have failed and working backwards from each of these to find where it went wrong. Here is a video which explains it fully: When I did this I came up with 3 scenarios as well as prevention and cure for each. In the 6 months that followed each scenario presented at some point but I was able to catch them early due to having done this. The last thing is to not over complicate this, don't hyper focus on systems and loose momentum optimizing each detail. Just ensure you do the fucking work. I was a little guilty of the above at times, trying to craft the perfect routine. In reality the person who just gets up, drinks too much coffee and works his ass off out performs the workflow perfectionist who visualizes and repeats affirmations, any day of the week. --- Next you need somewhere to store your notes, journal your trades and build your knowledge. For me this was Obsidian but I have also used Notion before and it is an equally viable option. Whichever one of these you choose be warned you will inevitably want to bang your head against a wall trying to use them for the first few days, but they will both click pretty quick and are 100% better options the word document or paper alternative. Here is my full obsidian setup tutorial: Here is a link to MisterPA 's notion Journal: Here is how I create "Meta-Notes" using obsidian: The process: - How I did it. - How I would do it if doing it again. Now I did things the "hard way" and manually worked my way back through each of MT's tweets starting in 2021, reading every one and logging those that I felt where relevant. You can see in my first post: the very first system I used to do this. I quickly adapted though after about a week and focused less on just logging each relevant tweet but trying to find and focusing on those which contained the most information. There where a lot of charts I looked at then skipped over because especially at the start of his timeline they contained little useful information and my time was better spent finding those where there was something to decode. Now this does not mean skip out on "work" just use your time efficiently. -- If however if I was to start from the beginning again with the goal of levelling up technical understanding as quickly as possible I would take a different approach. To start with I would familiarise myself with all relevant SMC concepts, I have linked the best free recourses for this below ๐Ÿ‘‡ CryptoChase beginner friendly index: Barncore's "The Moneytaur Way" series: Gian's Trading bootcamp playlist: Following this I would then work through all of Taur's subscription posts working backwards, recreating his charts and taking notes on his logic. The subscription feed has the highest value density and least noise. Video example of my notes from his subscription posts ๐Ÿ‘‡: --- Okay so now once you have a basic understanding of concepts and can re-recreate them on charts of your own it is time to put this in to practice. The next step is vigorous backtesting, you can use the trading view tool but I think trade Zella offers a more use friendly option if you pay for the subscription. Especially as it allows you to change timeframes without skipping ahead to candle close time of the timeframe you change too ( like Trading view does ) *my only note would be that their LTF/Micro TF data feed with be different to brokerage charts you will use on Trading view, to start with though you should not be going low enough that this is an issue. When you backtest in this context, treat it like real trading. That means journal and logging like you would if real cash was on the line. Take time, do not rush and focus on quality. Stick to BTC, ETH, Major FX pairs or indices as these assets are less reliant on confluence, backtesting a shitcoin is near useless as whether levels work or not will be highly dependent on Majors PA. Go on HTF, scroll back a couple years and try not too look at chart while doing so and then begin. Start with HTF analysis and work down to 2H or wherever you feel comfortable, chart it fully and then identify setups. Make rough notes / plans and then press play, execute the setups as they hit, log and journal trade management as well as observations and key notes. It is very important to not cheat when you do this, do not skip back and adjust your stoploss because it hit by 0.1%, do not skip back and adjust plan because you missed a block and your TP got frontrun. Instead these are the things you journal, embrace these mistakes because they are the cheapest mistakes you are going to make. Grind this, do it for hours, put some music on and enjoy. To start with focus on HTF's, as you get better and start netting $ on paper you can drop the timeframes and increase the difficulty. HTF = Normal, MTF = Medium, LTF = Hard. Even if you do not intend to day trade, learning how to read the lower TF's that force you to think faster, harder and prepare you for lower win rates / loss streaks can greatly improve your ability on higher TF's. While you are doing this as you start to have concepts click you now want to build up your real trading experience, take a sum of money that you care about but will be okay loosing and dedicate this to live trading. Start taking real trades and expect net losses in the beginning. This is where you will make you 2nd cheapest mistakes. This is also where you can begin to learn about your psychology. You may encounter some elements already in backtesting but the real market is where true colours really start to show. Mental issues are inevitable and part of the game, get used to them and start working to identify and fix them. Reading and applying books like Trading in the Zone and Mental Game of Trading are important and will help a lot but there is no easy fix, for some stuff you I believe you just have to get used to it and it goes away with experience. Losses suck at the beginning but after you loose 100 times you starting getting pretty numb to it, same goes for the winners. To accelerate the learning process, build connections and get advice there is also always the option of private groups, while I never personally chose this route and committed to learning everything through my own endeavours there is no denying that having nearly all the information you need structured and compiled in one place is valuable and can save time. Beyond this having access to real time thoughts and opinions of profitable traders can accelerate performance, however it carries the risk of being a double edged sword if not used properly, if relying on it like a crutch and using it as a substitute for real work you will not succeed. With that said if you take it for what it is, a learning opportunity then I believe it can be very beneficial. I am not a member of, nor affiliated with any paid group. There are now many options available within the community, all run by different people with different styles, tailored to different needs. If I was to make a recommendation though, as a non-member, it would be Albert & Co's 618'ers simply due to the diversity in styles of the traders running it and results I have seen from members I know personally. It is important that as you start to trade with real capital you reduce noise in your social feeds or eliminate it all together. You do not need 5 different opinions, you also do not need 2 people telling you the same thing in their own way so you feel re-assured. What you do need is to develop your independent thinking as a trader and be comfortable making different decisions to others, even traders ahead of yourself if it fits with your system or understanding of market. Taur here is perhaps an exception as this is who you are learning from but down the line a real test of your own ability and independence will be being able to stick with your own plan even when it differs from his. Don't get me wrong, counter trading him is retarded but you must learn to adapt his gift to your own style. This will make sense at some point. The next stage is taking your understanding of specific concepts to higher level as you simultaneously snowball experience. Look back through your journal and review where you lost money and made money, do not over extrapolate from a small sample but start to take notes and observe if trends in performance emerge. This is the beginning of the transition to self reliance, you now understand the strategy but must learn for yourself when and where it works. Here you can also learn more nuanced secondary concepts such as VSA, orderflow etc and add these to your game where appropriate. Do NOT get lost in the sauce though and remember mastery of basics is key. IMO a big focus should be understanding correlation thoroughly but especially on HTF's this is the most important thing and what triggers the majority of large swings where most of your cash will be made and losses recovered. Some people will disagree with me here but IMO you should also not be *focusing* on Odd TF's. These are secondary at best and most people overweight their significance leading to avoidable losses while wondering why price did not care about their 327minute Breaker Block which they think is the key to the market. Study Taurs feed and take note of how he mostly uses: 3M, 1M, 3W, 2W, 1W, 5D, 4D, 3D, 2D, 1D, 12H, 8H, 6H, 4H, 2H, 1H, 30m, 15m + micro time frames. The only thing left is time and repetition, you must show up each day and really do this, for months. Maybe you start to see result's, you catch your first key swing and where able to trade where others froze. Congratulations. Learn from these winners and repeat the actions. Find what assets work best for you, find your style, refine and grow. --- The last thing I will include is a short list of tools or links that can be helpful. - Trading view tutorial: - Dictionary: - Market news Calendar: --- Thank you too all those who have read this, I hope this has been helpful for the beginners who want to start but are just not sure how. ๐Ÿซถ Don't just bookmark this and move on, start ๐Ÿ™ƒ

Ace

45,185 Aufrufe โ€ข vor 9 Monaten