Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Super Simple Sphere posted by 💭 think tank It's literally just a simple sphere floating around. Not much else to it. How does it fly? what is it doing? why is it doing it? so many questions!?!? I heard that some people have them, where they landed and just...

11,222 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

11 Comments

antholito's profile picture
antholito1 year ago

@528vibes There was this

UserInterface's profile picture
UserInterface5 years ago

What is Space Force? Is it Really Real? #spaceforce #nasa #StarTrek

Carlos's profile picture
Carlos1 year ago

@528vibes I saw a fleet of these things over Mexico City many years ago. They looked a bit darker than the video. Flew in perfect formations. I honestly wouldn’t believe any of this if I hadn’t seen it.

Sierra's profile picture
Sierra1 year ago

@528vibes A good few years ago the sun newspaper in the UK published a picture on the front page with hundreds of them over a military base.

DJK's profile picture
DJK1 year ago

@528vibes It is fake..Unfortunatley there are some people that are pushing this narrative...image on the left is the real image and image on the right is how they changed it.....There are no floating metal balls with the dark band like that on the bottom...all faked..what ufology does best

Yishai's profile picture
Yishai1 year ago

@528vibes 528 frames? From @ 528 vibes? Synchronicity.

ProPixel Video Analysis and Research's profile picture
ProPixel Video Analysis and Research1 year ago

@528vibes ha.. cool catch! i didn't notice that.

.'s profile picture
.1 year ago

@528vibes There are also these spherical stone balls in Costa Rica, Central America. Nobody knows how, why, or when they were made—unless the natives were recreating something they saw in the sky.

Larrygrund2's profile picture
Larrygrund21 year ago

@528vibes pls analyze thorougly, tks!!!

Alex95's profile picture
Alex951 year ago

@528vibes My best guess from my own long term research this is antigravity electromagnetic drone which is transmedium can go in air water and deep space and it's probably from both Russia and China i seen China nuclear scientist patent on them fun fact he is awarded by CCP.

John's profile picture
John1 year ago

@528vibes I agree that it is still very interesting. Especially considering that it appears to be so stationary.

Related Videos

First, Rep. Burlison opened up about his recent trip to Mexico to investigate the Buga Sphere—a metallic UFO that was just recovered by civilians. “There’s this object that’s been flying around in Colombia, it’s like a beach ball-size metallic sphere … it’s called the Buga sphere.” “Then another one that’s like an identical sphere was also filmed about two months later in a region about 30 miles away.” “When it first came to the ground, it weighed about 2kg.” “By the time that I was able to look at it, it weighed a little over 10kg. So what they claim is that it started gaining mass over time.” “This sphere has got all these weird markings on it.” “When I was down there, there were three scientists that did work for NASA … that went on the same trip with me at the same time because they wanted to get samples of this sphere.” “The people that found this thing and have it, they don’t want it cut up. They think that’ll compromise its capabilities.” “So they cut off about one gram, I think, of the metal on the surface. And they’re going to test that to see if it was made on planet Earth or if it’s from another planet.” “The sphere has these little holes that go around what you would think is the equator.” “They cut this type of what they call the fiber optic. When you look in a magnifying glass, the inside of these holes … is filled with these intricate other holes.” “They were able to cut into that and pull that material out and they’re going to test it because they think that they can get carbon dating on that.” Eric Burlison Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

Holden Culotta

94,115 views • 1 year ago

Yes, indeed, this is lawlessness by any standard. Even by banana republic standards, this is still lawlessness. Your country has a constitution, it has a government, it has a police service, and it has a ruling party. I am sure you can see that some of the people there are actually wearing ruling party T-shirts. It is lawless regardless of whoever does it. It is an embarrassment to South Africa as a country, what you are doing and what you are encouraging people to do. Your country has an immigration service. If people are in your country illegally, they should be arrested and deported through lawful processes. You do not go around destroying property, tearing down markets, and attacking people. It is illegal regardless of whoever does it. It is not illegal because I have said so. It is illegal because the laws of your country make it so. This is vigilantism, pure and simple, and it is tainting the reputation of South Africa, not only across Africa but across the world. If you have got satellite television in your home, you can see that these actions are being reported everywhere. It is not good for your country. This kind of barbarism undermines the rule of law, fuels division, and damages South Africa’s standing as a constitutional democracy. It is the actions of a few that are tainting the reputation of many. The average South African is not mindless like this. They respect the law, and they respect the fact that among them, in their communities, there are people from other countries. If those people are in the country illegally, you report them and the law takes its course through proper processes of arrest and deportation. You do not descend into mob justice, lawlessness, and destruction. That is not who South Africans are, and it must not be normalised.

Hopewell Chin’ono

80,812 views • 2 months ago

Roger Penrose, Nobel Prize-winning physicist and mathematician, explains why we should stop calling it AI and start calling it "artificial cleverness": He believes the entire field is mislabelled, and the label itself is doing damage. His objection is simple but cuts deep: "The name is wrong. It's not artificial intelligence. It's not intelligence. Intelligence would involve consciousness. Well, if it's a machine, it's not conscious." For Penrose, people have confused raw computing power with genuine understanding. "People have lost the plot. They've lost it in the power of computing. The thing is that computers have got so powerful that they've lost the thread of what they're doing. But I think consciousness is something different. It's not computational." He believes the term itself has hypnotized people into a category error: "People are so hypnotized. The trouble is that AI is a bad term. It means artificial intelligence. Now intelligence in my view is conscious. That's what intelligence is about." So he proposes a rename. Artificial Cleverness. AC instead of AI. To illustrate the distinction, Penrose draws on his experience teaching mathematics: "You have mathematics students. Some of them understand what they're doing. Some are just clever. They can repeat what they've learned. They know how to do it very cleverly. They can calculate very well, but they don't necessarily understand what they're doing." That gap, between calculating well and actually understanding, is the gap Penrose sees between today's machines and genuine intelligence. Cleverness can be manufactured. Consciousness, in his view, cannot. So the question worth sitting with: when we call a system "intelligent," are we describing what it does, or quietly assuming something about what it is?

Big Brain AI

117,354 views • 1 month ago

Following my UFO research shared yesterday there has been a huge reaction, much of it very supportive but the best feedback I've been given is stuff like this! Where another pair of keen eyes and lateral thinking turns up interesting new information Polarity here demonstrates how the traditional Google map search for the base shows what looks like wasteland or construction, from 2017 And now I realise why some people were sending me odd questions about the base because unless you update it manually you don't see what is actually there now in 2025 And of course I am in the UK and we see many different versions of not just Google but other US-based information, some of it actually helps my other research as I appear to have access to some things that Americans don't, but it works both ways However I urge you to watch the full critique that Josh does which is very fair and very constructive helping me know what else I have not made clear or not looked at in enough detail Also I realise people are so suspicious of AI that they simply think I am some idiot that just asks it questions and waits for it to answer them; understandably I know because many people do this But if you listen to the Space that I hosted directly after posting yesterday or indeed look at the complete discussion I had with AI, which I have published in its entirety, hopefully you will see that researchers like myself use it only as a tool. For example I looked at architecture, Electro magnetic security, geology/construction and anomalies in building locations, none of which it volunteered. Thank you very much to Josh for this and anybody else who has this sort of insightful constructive feedback please do let me know.

Moneypenny

19,957 views • 11 months ago