Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Sure general consumers don’t care about open source models. But that’s not the point “You open your free intelligence app on your little iPhone. Because you say to the world, I don’t care how this stuff works I just don’t want to write emails. What you don’t know is...

16,570 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

11 Kommentare

Profilbild von Andrew McLuhan
Andrew McLuhanvor 1 Jahr

the devil shorts nvidia

Profilbild von Reggie James
Reggie Jamesvor 1 Jahr

I’ll write it

Profilbild von The Information
The Informationvor 1 Jahr

OpenAI is betting on a little-known startup to stay ahead of Elon Musk in the supercomputer race.

Profilbild von ruby justice thelot
ruby justice thelotvor 1 Jahr

Reggie

Profilbild von codyb
codybvor 1 Jahr

lol. yes!

Profilbild von Reggie James
Reggie Jamesvor 1 Jahr

Came to me in a dream

Profilbild von Hana Azab
Hana Azabvor 1 Jahr

magnum opus level storytelling unlocked

Profilbild von Reggie James
Reggie Jamesvor 1 Jahr

Unfortunately I already know this post won’t get the love it deserves 😭

Profilbild von Visakan Veerasamy
Visakan Veerasamyvor 1 Jahr

magnificent

Profilbild von Reggie James
Reggie Jamesvor 1 Jahr

All it took was one cup of coffee

Profilbild von Alex Sharp
Alex Sharpvor 1 Jahr

Good god. Tremendous. Paging @bangerarchive

Ähnliche Videos

Dario Amodei just dismantled the biggest myth in the AI industry. Open source AI isn’t free. It never was. Amodei: “It’s not free. You have to run it on inference and someone has to make it fast on inference.” For decades, open source meant something real. It meant a teenager in a basement could download the same tools as a Fortune 500 company. Could read the code. Could modify it. Could build something that competed with the giants. That was genuine democratization. That actually happened. AI is different. Fundamentally. Physically. In ways the ideology hasn’t caught up to yet. Downloading the weights is the easy part. The part that actually costs something is turning the weights into a running system. Into responses. Into intelligence operating in real time at scale. That requires compute. Power. Infrastructure. The kind measured in billions of dollars and years of construction. Amodei: “These are big models. They’re hard to do inference on. Ultimately you have to host it on the cloud. The people who host it on the cloud do inference.” The open source debate was never about who owns the model. It was always about who owns the cloud. And Amodei goes further. When a competitor drops a new open model, he doesn’t ask whether it’s open or closed. He doesn’t care about the licensing. He doesn’t engage the ideology. Amodei: “I don’t think it mattered that DeepSeek is open source. I think I ask, is it a good model? Is it better than us at the things that matter? That’s the only thing that I care about.” That’s the ruthless clarity of someone actually trying to win. While the media debates licensing frameworks, Amodei is asking one question. Is it better. Everything else is a distraction. Amodei: “I don’t think open source works the same way in AI that it has worked in other areas. Here we can’t see inside the model.” This isn’t Linux. You can’t read it. You can’t fork it. You can’t understand it the way generations of developers understood the tools they inherited. You can download it. And then you need a data center to run it. The teenager in the basement who was supposed to be empowered by this revolution needs a billion dollars of infrastructure before the empowerment starts. The era of the basement coder rewriting civilization on a laptop is over. The future belongs to whoever commands the compute, owns the power grid, and can actually turn the intelligence on. Open weights without infrastructure isn’t democratization. It’s a promise the physics of the universe won’t let us keep.

Dustin

686,754 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Elon exposes OpenAI -- OpenAI execs betrayed the founding mission as soon as there was revenue and profits to be had -- If it started as a for-profit, Elon would own 50% Elon Musk: “There's a mountain of evidence that shows that OpenAI was created as an open source nonprofit.” “That's the exact description in the incorporation documents. They have completely violated that.” “And they tried to change the definition of OpenAI to mean open to everyone instead of open source, even though it always meant open source.” “ I came up with the name. That’s how I know.” “ I mean, essentially, since I came up with the idea for the company, named it, provided the A, B, and C rounds of funding, recruited the critical personnel, and told them everything I know, if that had been a commercial corporation, I'd probably own half the company.” “It was totally at my discretion. I could have done that.” “But I created it as an open source nonprofit for the world.” Chamath: “ Do you think the right thing to do is to take those models and just open source them today?” Elon: “ Yeah, I think that is what it was created to do, so it should.” “Try using any of the recent so-called OpenAI open source models, they don't work.” “They open sourced a broken, non-working version of their models as a fig leaf.” “I mean, do you know anyone who's running OpenAI's open source models? Jason: “No.” Elon: “Exactly.”

The All-In Podcast

387,223 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten