正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🇸🇪 Sweden's Ongoing Suicide Explained in the simplest way possible – the current (anti-White) Narrative says the following: The ultimate evil is 1930s Germany. Every step, no matter how small, towards that is an act of evil. • Decreased immigration or a closed border? One step closer to 1930s...

TheGloriousLion's profile picture

The Golden One

68,060 subscribers

37,829 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇸🇪 Insanity? Why Young Swedish Women Voted Left What causes this self-harm behaviour you might ask. Why would young women – the primary victims of Third World mass-immigration – vote for parties that are for increased immigration and lenient punishments for criminals? The simplest explanation is that these young women are just doing what they have been told to do. They have, since birth, been told that the straight, White man is the epitome of evil; anti-White hatred coupled with radical feminism in “education”. Thus, it comes as no surprise that they vote for the parties that are against the White man. White women do not want mass-immigration from the Third World, as is evident by their dating preferences and their preferences regarding where to live. White women want to date White men and want to live in White areas. What they also do not want, however, is to be a “Nazi”. A “Nazi” is essentially anyone who is for any type of Right-wing views (including immigration restriction). They do not want to be a “Nazi” – thus they do not want to vote for “Nazi” parties. How to solve this? Shame them! Women who support Left-wing parties should be shamed for it. What they are doing (enabling more crime, for example) is evil, and they should know it. Reshaping the Moral Framework and shifting the Zeitgeist is the key to success in getting women on board with a pro-European message. Note – this is primarily about younger women. Older Swedish women show a different voting pattern (women mature as they get older and have families).
7:17

🇸🇪 Insanity? Why Young Swedish Women Voted Left What causes this self-harm behaviour you might ask. Why would young women – the primary victims of Third World mass-immigration – vote for parties that are for increased immigration and lenient punishments for criminals? The simplest explanation is that these young women are just doing what they have been told to do. They have, since birth, been told that the straight, White man is the epitome of evil; anti-White hatred coupled with radical feminism in “education”. Thus, it comes as no surprise that they vote for the parties that are against the White man. White women do not want mass-immigration from the Third World, as is evident by their dating preferences and their preferences regarding where to live. White women want to date White men and want to live in White areas. What they also do not want, however, is to be a “Nazi”. A “Nazi” is essentially anyone who is for any type of Right-wing views (including immigration restriction). They do not want to be a “Nazi” – thus they do not want to vote for “Nazi” parties. How to solve this? Shame them! Women who support Left-wing parties should be shamed for it. What they are doing (enabling more crime, for example) is evil, and they should know it. Reshaping the Moral Framework and shifting the Zeitgeist is the key to success in getting women on board with a pro-European message. Note – this is primarily about younger women. Older Swedish women show a different voting pattern (women mature as they get older and have families).

The Golden One

12,340 次观看 • 4 天前

Stay with me here for a second. Is it possible that God is using this Epstein situation to bring people closer to him? The average person cannot comprehend the terrible things that these people have done to children. But now they can’t hide from it anymore. And because of that people are realizing and seeing that there is true evil in this world, and they are turning to God.
1:51

Stay with me here for a second. Is it possible that God is using this Epstein situation to bring people closer to him? The average person cannot comprehend the terrible things that these people have done to children. But now they can’t hide from it anymore. And because of that people are realizing and seeing that there is true evil in this world, and they are turning to God.

AmericanPapaBear™

22,828 次观看 • 7 个月前

Being Dominant means being the One in Control. Some people love it and some hate it, but either way, there is always someone in control and the areas where you are not the one in control, are where you have given that control to someone else! Being the one in control means being the one people TRUST to lead, to be in charge. And for us to hold that responsibility, we gotta be not only comfortable with that role, but to love it! To want it. Control holds negative connotations, yet if it is exerted by someone with positive intentions, it is very healthy. It means you trust yourself and don't need to rely on others to direct you. NOT being in control means chaos. It means helplessness. It means inability to make decisions. Or to take initiatives. It means you are the one that follows. And if that is what you actually desire you have to be conscious of that choice. Otherwise you fall into that role and then wonder why nothing goes as you want. And if you choose to follow, choose your leader wisely. There always is someone in control, someone in charge, someone that leads. There is always a power dynamic. Truth is, we feel safe with those in control. Especially when they show us that them being in that role is positive for us. But so many people trust others more than they trust themselves! Which means being constantly influenced by everyone else's option and advice... which makes then the ones in control of your life! Decide WHO you want to take control when you want or need it, but also choose when YOU should be The One in charge. Developing that self-trust requires radical self responsibility. Which is what people struggle with. Nobody wants to be responsible for anything. And then we blame everyone for why our lives are not what we want them to be. And if you DO want to dominate, start by controling your own Self, your own thoughts, your own life. You can't expect others to trust YOU if YOU don't. Think about it... those that are in control are the people that have the most influence in the world. So if conscious people who desire to create a positive change take more control/responsibility, it would literally change society as we know it.
4:52

Being Dominant means being the One in Control. Some people love it and some hate it, but either way, there is always someone in control and the areas where you are not the one in control, are where you have given that control to someone else! Being the one in control means being the one people TRUST to lead, to be in charge. And for us to hold that responsibility, we gotta be not only comfortable with that role, but to love it! To want it. Control holds negative connotations, yet if it is exerted by someone with positive intentions, it is very healthy. It means you trust yourself and don't need to rely on others to direct you. NOT being in control means chaos. It means helplessness. It means inability to make decisions. Or to take initiatives. It means you are the one that follows. And if that is what you actually desire you have to be conscious of that choice. Otherwise you fall into that role and then wonder why nothing goes as you want. And if you choose to follow, choose your leader wisely. There always is someone in control, someone in charge, someone that leads. There is always a power dynamic. Truth is, we feel safe with those in control. Especially when they show us that them being in that role is positive for us. But so many people trust others more than they trust themselves! Which means being constantly influenced by everyone else's option and advice... which makes then the ones in control of your life! Decide WHO you want to take control when you want or need it, but also choose when YOU should be The One in charge. Developing that self-trust requires radical self responsibility. Which is what people struggle with. Nobody wants to be responsible for anything. And then we blame everyone for why our lives are not what we want them to be. And if you DO want to dominate, start by controling your own Self, your own thoughts, your own life. You can't expect others to trust YOU if YOU don't. Think about it... those that are in control are the people that have the most influence in the world. So if conscious people who desire to create a positive change take more control/responsibility, it would literally change society as we know it.

Ms. Malissia

18,397 次观看 • 2 年前

One of the most disheartening parts of "LawTube", is their complete willlingness to either gloss over the nuances of the law or misstate it all together to fit the narrative that they most benfit from ($). People want to be told what they want to hear and their reliance on that positive feeback loop is what makes these people money. It's not that they don't know these things, they do, but they are appealing to their own authority to cover up the glaring lapsed in their biased, commercially driven coverage. This is abundantly clear in the dogshit "analysis" already being thrown out there of the newly-filed defamation lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. Lawtube is quite simply lying to you because you want to hear that it is a losing case. It's not. Do your own research.
5:15

One of the most disheartening parts of "LawTube", is their complete willlingness to either gloss over the nuances of the law or misstate it all together to fit the narrative that they most benfit from ($). People want to be told what they want to hear and their reliance on that positive feeback loop is what makes these people money. It's not that they don't know these things, they do, but they are appealing to their own authority to cover up the glaring lapsed in their biased, commercially driven coverage. This is abundantly clear in the dogshit "analysis" already being thrown out there of the newly-filed defamation lawsuit against Karen Read and Aidan Kearney. Lawtube is quite simply lying to you because you want to hear that it is a losing case. It's not. Do your own research.

Kate Peter

23,835 次观看 • 5 个月前

"It is going to be a bazaar for criminals because the first thing — why is state police a big deal? It is not for the protection of you nor I. It is so that politicians will have tools in their hands in order to be able to do what they want to do, in uniform and armed." — Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF
3:03

"It is going to be a bazaar for criminals because the first thing — why is state police a big deal? It is not for the protection of you nor I. It is so that politicians will have tools in their hands in order to be able to do what they want to do, in uniform and armed." — Chidi Anselm Odinkalu, CGoF

TheCable

44,461 次观看 • 2 个月前

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.
0:43

I stood on the steps of the Supreme Court Monday . Donald Trump has done real things for MAHA. I believe that. But when the Department of Justice shows up to defend Bayer and Monsanto against the American people, against the health of our children, I have to say: you got this one wrong. Liability protection for corporations that poison people is not a conservative value. It is not a Republican value. It is not a Democratic value. It is not an American value. It is the opposite of a free market. It is the government putting its thumb on the scale for corporations that are losing in court because their products are causing cancer. Every child in this country deserves to be healthy. That is not a political statement. That is the only statement that matters. So in the words of the President himself: we are going to fight, fight.

Del Bigtree

147,529 次观看 • 4 个月前

The subject of 'owning a slave' is dense. It is something we hear a lot when we are in the FemDom Realm. Is it just fantasy? Can it actually be a lifestyle? How do we navigate this type of dynamic? How do we even get to that level of D/s? In this short clip [Exerpt from SLAVE TRAINING Part 2] I want to already bring to your attention one thing that will define if your desire for a slave (or desire as a slave) is touching more on a fantasy or... how can you actually navigate this in a realistic way. No one person 'can do it all' or should be expected to. If you want your slave to be 'the best' , assign them a specific role in which they can excel... and then build upon that. Once they 'master' your housekeeping (which takes quite a bit of real training), they can move to other levels. And an important note I want to leave here... make them EARN access to certain things in your life that sometimes you just want to delegate because you don't want to manage or don't know how to manage. Entrusting them with serious tasks that can affect your life, your business, your reputation, are on top of the ladder. Are they even qualified for the thing you want them to take off your shoulders? Start small and allow them to grow in their submission, to develop their skills and to learn how to best satisfy you without setting them up for failure by expecting too much, too quick. In the end, if you want this to truly work, you have to approach it from a place that transcends the roles. As this is consensual power exchange. And you both want to be fulfilled in that relationship.
1:16

The subject of 'owning a slave' is dense. It is something we hear a lot when we are in the FemDom Realm. Is it just fantasy? Can it actually be a lifestyle? How do we navigate this type of dynamic? How do we even get to that level of D/s? In this short clip [Exerpt from SLAVE TRAINING Part 2] I want to already bring to your attention one thing that will define if your desire for a slave (or desire as a slave) is touching more on a fantasy or... how can you actually navigate this in a realistic way. No one person 'can do it all' or should be expected to. If you want your slave to be 'the best' , assign them a specific role in which they can excel... and then build upon that. Once they 'master' your housekeeping (which takes quite a bit of real training), they can move to other levels. And an important note I want to leave here... make them EARN access to certain things in your life that sometimes you just want to delegate because you don't want to manage or don't know how to manage. Entrusting them with serious tasks that can affect your life, your business, your reputation, are on top of the ladder. Are they even qualified for the thing you want them to take off your shoulders? Start small and allow them to grow in their submission, to develop their skills and to learn how to best satisfy you without setting them up for failure by expecting too much, too quick. In the end, if you want this to truly work, you have to approach it from a place that transcends the roles. As this is consensual power exchange. And you both want to be fulfilled in that relationship.

Ms. Malissia

13,796 次观看 • 7 个月前

Women aren't naturally crazy. The reason that so many women act crazy is because their hormones and nervous systems are completely messed up from things like hair dyes, shampoos, conditioners, body lotions, vaccines, ultra processed foods and birth control pills. A lot of the products that are sold to women are completely unnecessary but even the ones that are necessary can be replaced with something natural. In order for a woman to not be crazy, she needs to feel safe and secure. The way to do this is by not putting on products that mess up your hormones and living in an environment that's not overly chaotic. The reason that women like to shop so much is because it mimics picking berries in nature. The moral of the story is if you're a woman and you don't want to be crazy you need to lock in the products that you're using and the environment that you're living.
0:51

Women aren't naturally crazy. The reason that so many women act crazy is because their hormones and nervous systems are completely messed up from things like hair dyes, shampoos, conditioners, body lotions, vaccines, ultra processed foods and birth control pills. A lot of the products that are sold to women are completely unnecessary but even the ones that are necessary can be replaced with something natural. In order for a woman to not be crazy, she needs to feel safe and secure. The way to do this is by not putting on products that mess up your hormones and living in an environment that's not overly chaotic. The reason that women like to shop so much is because it mimics picking berries in nature. The moral of the story is if you're a woman and you don't want to be crazy you need to lock in the products that you're using and the environment that you're living.

Riley Check

15,638 次观看 • 5 个月前

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.
6:07

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

22,015 次观看 • 4 个月前

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.
2:53

Your faith was forged in people who would rather be exterminated than assimilated. A soft version of it, eager to be liked and desperate to fit in, is not the thing they died to hand you. So stop striving to be liked. Stop angling to be loved by a world that drove your fathers into the snow. That world would think no better of the gospel today than it did in 1838. Stop trying to file down every peculiar and glorious edge of the Restoration until the world finally finds you acceptable. It never will. And the wanting of its approval is the slow death of everything your people bled to preserve. I am thinking of the proclamation on the family, and of how many have quietly gone looking for a way around it. Some say it aloud now. Some march under the world's Pride banners and tell themselves it is only love. They have done the quiet arithmetic and concluded that if they give the world this one doctrine, the world will finally stop hating them, finally let them belong, finally call them good. It does not work that way. It has never once worked that way. Understand what the world actually hates, because it is not a single teaching about marriage that it cannot abide. It is the claim. It is the unbearable, scandalous claim that the keys of the priesthood were restored to the earth, that there is a prophet who speaks for God, that this and no other is the authorized house of the Lord. That is the offense. That is what it cannot forgive. You could surrender every doctrine the world finds distasteful, one after another, and you would not buy a single hour of peace, because the thing it objects to is not your position on this or that. It is that you claim to hold the authority of heaven, and it intends to see that claim humbled. The doctrine is only the doorway it is pushing on. The house is what it wants. Embrace the truth. Embrace the battle that has always come with it, because there has always been a battle, and there is one now. It is the oldest war there is, good against evil, light against the dark, and you were born onto its field whether you wished to be or not. You did not inherit a museum. You inherited a war, and a banner, and a people who never once surrendered it. You are a Mormon. The blood of the persecuted is in you, and the truth they died for is in your hands. You are not tourists. You are not spectators. You are the heirs of warriors, and the line they held is now yours to hold. So plant your feet on the ground they bled for. Lift the banner they would not drop.

Kirk Rollins

30,483 次观看 • 3 个月前

Sam Altman: “No matter how great your idea is, no one cares.” Sam is asked what a founder should do if they have an idea but don’t want to talk about it because a big company might steal it. He responds: “Here is one of the things that takes founders a long time to learn: No matter how great your idea is, no one cares. Everybody is so distracted that you could probably put that idea with exact instructions for how to implement it on Tim Cook’s desk and take no risk.” Sam continues: “Extreme secrecy among founders is a bad sign. You want to keep some things secret for sure, but you should be willing to talk about the broad sketches of what you’re doing because you need that to recruit people, to get investors, to get customers.” Talking about your idea is also how you get feedback from other really smart people. Sam gives his own experience with Y Combinator as an example: “We at YC talk about everything we do. We talk about how to operate. We give our best possible advice. I have given talks before to rooms of people that want to start accelerators. And I say: ‘If you want to start an accelerator, here is exactly what to do step by step, and here are the mistakes to avoid step by step.’ And people always say, ‘Are you crazy? You’re giving away YC secrets.’ And we are, and yet no one ever listens… It was hard for me to learn this lesson of not fearing this… But don’t be afraid of telling people what you do.”
2:34

Sam Altman: “No matter how great your idea is, no one cares.” Sam is asked what a founder should do if they have an idea but don’t want to talk about it because a big company might steal it. He responds: “Here is one of the things that takes founders a long time to learn: No matter how great your idea is, no one cares. Everybody is so distracted that you could probably put that idea with exact instructions for how to implement it on Tim Cook’s desk and take no risk.” Sam continues: “Extreme secrecy among founders is a bad sign. You want to keep some things secret for sure, but you should be willing to talk about the broad sketches of what you’re doing because you need that to recruit people, to get investors, to get customers.” Talking about your idea is also how you get feedback from other really smart people. Sam gives his own experience with Y Combinator as an example: “We at YC talk about everything we do. We talk about how to operate. We give our best possible advice. I have given talks before to rooms of people that want to start accelerators. And I say: ‘If you want to start an accelerator, here is exactly what to do step by step, and here are the mistakes to avoid step by step.’ And people always say, ‘Are you crazy? You’re giving away YC secrets.’ And we are, and yet no one ever listens… It was hard for me to learn this lesson of not fearing this… But don’t be afraid of telling people what you do.”

Startup Archive

212,886 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elias: There are two possibilities here. The first is that the Postal Service and Donald Trump know that this can’t be done. And that’s actually the point. That’s not a flaw. That’s a feature. Because what they want—what Donald Trump wants—is for states to fail at achieving what it is the Postal Service told them to achieve. So that Donald Trump will then be able to say that the states disregarded this regulation, the states were, you know, were rife with fraud, whatever it is, right? So, like, in some ways, they want this to not be a smooth process for the sake of pointing that out, that when Democrats win control of Congress, they can point to that. The second is that Donald Trump’s going to somehow just declare that, well, you know what, if states can’t do it, then no one can vote by mail.
1:25

Elias: There are two possibilities here. The first is that the Postal Service and Donald Trump know that this can’t be done. And that’s actually the point. That’s not a flaw. That’s a feature. Because what they want—what Donald Trump wants—is for states to fail at achieving what it is the Postal Service told them to achieve. So that Donald Trump will then be able to say that the states disregarded this regulation, the states were, you know, were rife with fraud, whatever it is, right? So, like, in some ways, they want this to not be a smooth process for the sake of pointing that out, that when Democrats win control of Congress, they can point to that. The second is that Donald Trump’s going to somehow just declare that, well, you know what, if states can’t do it, then no one can vote by mail.

Acyn

56,264 次观看 • 23 天前

Sectarian Gaza candidates are a natural result of mass immigration of strong cultures into a continent which had lost confidence in its own. Had Europe maintained a strong identity and a dominant culture, perhaps integration would have been possible, and imported minority cultures would not have been able to become dominant. Clearly, British students are in fact able to find meaning in identity, but they are unable to find it in being British because they have no sense of what that is. In many cases they now find their identity in the culture that, despite being a minority culture, is a strong and therefore meaningful one (to them). They find identity and meaning in being pro Palestine, anti Israel, pro mass immigration and, importantly, anti anyone who doesn’t conform to it. By making that demand for conformity very clear to others, there is a generation of young people, in particular young women, whose political stances are based on the pressure to conform to this identity. Their conformity is rewarded with the power of becoming an enforcer, making the identity even more appealing.
1:30

Sectarian Gaza candidates are a natural result of mass immigration of strong cultures into a continent which had lost confidence in its own. Had Europe maintained a strong identity and a dominant culture, perhaps integration would have been possible, and imported minority cultures would not have been able to become dominant. Clearly, British students are in fact able to find meaning in identity, but they are unable to find it in being British because they have no sense of what that is. In many cases they now find their identity in the culture that, despite being a minority culture, is a strong and therefore meaningful one (to them). They find identity and meaning in being pro Palestine, anti Israel, pro mass immigration and, importantly, anti anyone who doesn’t conform to it. By making that demand for conformity very clear to others, there is a generation of young people, in particular young women, whose political stances are based on the pressure to conform to this identity. Their conformity is rewarded with the power of becoming an enforcer, making the identity even more appealing.

Connie Shaw

16,456 次观看 • 4 个月前

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC
4:20

[WATCH] The question before the Court is short, and it is a question of law. When a political party has completed the Commission’s prescribed forms and uploaded its lists onto the Commission’s own system before the hour, has that party submitted its lists? The movement says it has. The Commission says it has not. That is a disagreement between a political party and a public institution about what a statute means, and this country built a specialist court for precisely that. The Electoral Court will decide it. The ANC will abide by what the courts decide. I say that now, before judgment, so that nobody need ask afterwards. I want to address the judgment the Electoral Court handed down on Friday in the matter of the UDF Party, because it has been reported as a blow to the ANC. The Court held that the Commission has no power to exempt one party from a deadline that binds all others. The African National Congress agrees with that. We have never asked for an exemption. We have never asked for an extension. We are not asking for one now. What the UDF asked for and what the ANC asks for are different things, and Friday’s judgment is the clearest statement yet of that difference. And to those who have warned the Commission against giving the ANC “preferential treatment”, I say this plainly. The ANC wants none. Whatever relief the Court grants, the movement has asked that it apply to every affected party on the same terms — to the forty-four other parties as much as to us. If the ANC succeeds, two thousand and ninety-three candidates who are not ours succeed with us. That is the only kind of relief this movement would accept. Now let me speak about the Electoral Commission again. The Electoral Commission is a Chapter Nine institution of our Constitution. The African National Congress, more than any other organisation in this country, argued for it, negotiated it and built it. Through seven national elections and six local elections, the ANC has accepted every substantive result the Commission has declared — including the result of 2024, which took from this movement the majority it had held for thirty years. We accepted it on the night. We did not go to a stage and call the Commission a thief. That record is who we are, and it is not for sale in a dispute over six councils. So let me be clear about what the ANC is doing and what it is not doing. The ANC is not attacking the Electoral Commission. The ANC disagrees with the Commission on a point of law, and it has taken that disagreement to the court that Parliament created to hear it. Disagreement in a court is how a democracy respects an institution. Disagreement on a stage, with slogans, is how a democracy weakens one. The movement has chosen the court, respectfully. There are parties in this country who have used this matter to relitigate their own grievances against the Commission. The ANC will not join them, and it will not be used by them. Where the Commission is attacked for doing its work, this movement will defend it, as it has always defended it. We have a responsibility to the institutions of this state that the Commission’s other critics do not carry, and we will carry it even while we are in court against it. And there is a responsibility on all of us that goes beyond this matter. Forty-five parties used one channel and had challenges. That is a fact about the channel, whatever the Court decides about the law. After this election the ANC will go to the Party Liaison Committee and propose, for every party, that the electronic route carry a receipt; that its final step be prescribed in regulation, published in the Gazette, where every party can read it, and not only in software; and that a party be able to see the record of what the Commission holds from it. Not so that the ANC is spared next time. So that no party, large or small, ever again stands where forty-five parties stand this morning. #ANCMediaBriefing #SGMbalulaSpeaks #LGE2026VoteANC

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

14,268 次观看 • 12 天前