Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Sylvester Stallone says he wrote the original Rocky script in three and a half days Sistine: "But obviously it worked out, you wrote the script in three days? Four days?" Sylvester: "Three and a half days" "I tell young people that want to be writers, don't get so hung... show more

sara

2,756 subscribers

109,147 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

The difference a lot of people don't realize is that when you're a celebrity, 50% of the population doesn't like you. That's just how it is. They don't like you. But when you're a politician, 50% of the constituency hates you and two and a half percent of them want to kill you. That's the difference. There's always that two and a half percent lunatic fringe no matter where you are. It's pretty scary and it's tough on your family and that's why I have so much respect for politicians.

The difference a lot of people don't realize is that when you're a celebrity, 50% of the population doesn't like you. That's just how it is. They don't like you. But when you're a politician, 50% of the constituency hates you and two and a half percent of them want to kill you. That's the difference. There's always that two and a half percent lunatic fringe no matter where you are. It's pretty scary and it's tough on your family and that's why I have so much respect for politicians.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

24,897 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Mikel Arteta says even if he gives the players a break from each other then they would just meet up anyway: “That's the theory, and I wish we could be in Dubai. So, if we have one or two days, I guarantee you that we were in Dubai for a few days, even if it was for a few days, because everybody was dying for it. “But then you get very surprised because sometimes, when I give them the day off, and you think that they don't want to see each other, no? Then I find out that Eight players or ten were having dinner in somebody's house. They spent the whole afternoon together… “And that's the beauty of it, the fact that they want to be together because they feel like being together is the best thing that they can do. And that was the case this week as well in a lot of cases.”

Mikel Arteta says even if he gives the players a break from each other then they would just meet up anyway: “That's the theory, and I wish we could be in Dubai. So, if we have one or two days, I guarantee you that we were in Dubai for a few days, even if it was for a few days, because everybody was dying for it. “But then you get very surprised because sometimes, when I give them the day off, and you think that they don't want to see each other, no? Then I find out that Eight players or ten were having dinner in somebody's house. They spent the whole afternoon together… “And that's the beauty of it, the fact that they want to be together because they feel like being together is the best thing that they can do. And that was the case this week as well in a lot of cases.”

Connor Humm

414,911 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Watters on floods: There's a school of thought in the left that says the more people you have, the better results you get.. Look at the golden age of Hollywood. Back in the day they had one studio head. He was the risk taker and made all the decisions and had an army of writers and producers. He would approve a script and get it up. Then a box office hit. Today, I don't know, there's an army of executives that they have so many people making decisions that no decision ever gets done. So they just have to reboot old hits like that's why you have jurassic park 17.

Watters on floods: There's a school of thought in the left that says the more people you have, the better results you get.. Look at the golden age of Hollywood. Back in the day they had one studio head. He was the risk taker and made all the decisions and had an army of writers and producers. He would approve a script and get it up. Then a box office hit. Today, I don't know, there's an army of executives that they have so many people making decisions that no decision ever gets done. So they just have to reboot old hits like that's why you have jurassic park 17.

Acyn

52,446 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Trump is babbling complete nonsense “Hopefully they'll be able to get these expensive computers going. You know, the reason you use computers is to make time so that it's like fast. You don't use them so that you have to come up with an answer three days later. And that's a little scary when they say what, what are they doing? You use a computer because it calculates quickly and you use paper because you save cost, but the paper turns out to be much quicker than the computer”

Trump is babbling complete nonsense “Hopefully they'll be able to get these expensive computers going. You know, the reason you use computers is to make time so that it's like fast. You don't use them so that you have to come up with an answer three days later. And that's a little scary when they say what, what are they doing? You use a computer because it calculates quickly and you use paper because you save cost, but the paper turns out to be much quicker than the computer”

Headquarters

1,599,470 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Chris Williamson says the reason you can’t stay consistent might be sitting at the bottom of a wine glass “So many people want to build habits. They want to build a meditation routine, they want to go to the gym more consistently, they want to improve their eating habits. They don't realize that the thing that's stopping them from doing that is sat at the bottom of the glass of wine that they have four nights a week” “I think that 90 days would be the absolute minimum. 30 days isn't long enough. You need longer. Especially given that the hardest bit is the start, which means that you've paid all of the pain at the very beginning to not actually get any of the benefits of this being your new habit” “A huge proportion of people will not want to go back to drinking. They'll take time off, get into it, and realise I actually don't like this”

Chris Williamson says the reason you can’t stay consistent might be sitting at the bottom of a wine glass “So many people want to build habits. They want to build a meditation routine, they want to go to the gym more consistently, they want to improve their eating habits. They don't realize that the thing that's stopping them from doing that is sat at the bottom of the glass of wine that they have four nights a week” “I think that 90 days would be the absolute minimum. 30 days isn't long enough. You need longer. Especially given that the hardest bit is the start, which means that you've paid all of the pain at the very beginning to not actually get any of the benefits of this being your new habit” “A huge proportion of people will not want to go back to drinking. They'll take time off, get into it, and realise I actually don't like this”

Mikli

47,207 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Power has a secret. It doesn't come from armies. It doesn't come from money. It comes from three things. Secrecy. Trust. Coordination. The people who understand this form secret societies. Not because they are evil. Because they are rational. If you have information others don't have you have power others don't have. If you trust your allies completely and your enemies trust no one you will always win. If you can coordinate across governments across militaries across banks without anyone knowing you can move history itself. And the mechanism that allows all three to work together is eschatology. A shared script. A shared vision of how the world ends. They don't need to communicate. They don't need to agree. They just follow the script. And the script moves history forward. That is how secret societies work. That is how they always have.

Power has a secret. It doesn't come from armies. It doesn't come from money. It comes from three things. Secrecy. Trust. Coordination. The people who understand this form secret societies. Not because they are evil. Because they are rational. If you have information others don't have you have power others don't have. If you trust your allies completely and your enemies trust no one you will always win. If you can coordinate across governments across militaries across banks without anyone knowing you can move history itself. And the mechanism that allows all three to work together is eschatology. A shared script. A shared vision of how the world ends. They don't need to communicate. They don't need to agree. They just follow the script. And the script moves history forward. That is how secret societies work. That is how they always have.

Predictive History

10,283 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Randy Fine tells the Democrats to SHOVE IT after they try to censure him for supporting dogs over Muslims "We have to change how WE live in order to make immigrants more comfortable here?! That's NOT HOW IT WORKS." 🔥 "If Muslims don't want to have dogs, that's perfectly fine, but they don't get to tell ME I don't get to have one, and they certainly don't get to tell you in the United States of America that you don't get to have one." "That shouldn't be controversial. The fact that it is tells you how far the Democratic Party has fallen." He nailed it.

🚨 JUST IN: Rep. Randy Fine tells the Democrats to SHOVE IT after they try to censure him for supporting dogs over Muslims "We have to change how WE live in order to make immigrants more comfortable here?! That's NOT HOW IT WORKS." 🔥 "If Muslims don't want to have dogs, that's perfectly fine, but they don't get to tell ME I don't get to have one, and they certainly don't get to tell you in the United States of America that you don't get to have one." "That shouldn't be controversial. The fact that it is tells you how far the Democratic Party has fallen." He nailed it.

Eric Daugherty

387,968 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Kay Lee Ray fka Alba Fyre revealed that she has no 90 days non-compete clause: "My contract was up and I knew it was coming up and the decision whether I wanted to stay or not, I know some other people got fired and they have the 90 days clause, but because my contract was just ending it means I didn't have the 90 days and I was able and come to do this (EVE 150: History Makers / Rule Breakers) and do it as kind of a surprise, but it wasn't really a surprise, but yeah, really liked that it worked out this way." - Source: Daily Star

Kay Lee Ray fka Alba Fyre revealed that she has no 90 days non-compete clause: "My contract was up and I knew it was coming up and the decision whether I wanted to stay or not, I know some other people got fired and they have the 90 days clause, but because my contract was just ending it means I didn't have the 90 days and I was able and come to do this (EVE 150: History Makers / Rule Breakers) and do it as kind of a surprise, but it wasn't really a surprise, but yeah, really liked that it worked out this way." - Source: Daily Star

Sinneswandel 🌓

77,654 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Mark Cuban says there are four rules anyone must follow if they want to become a millionaire "If you want to be a millionaire, you can do it. But there's a couple of things you have to be able to accomplish. Rule number one, find something you can be good at and then be great at it." "Second, you have to know how to sell. Whatever it is you're good at, somebody's going to need that service. Someone's going to need that, whatever it is that you're creating. But you have to be able to sell because you don't want to be in a position where you're dependent on other people." "Number three, be curious and always be learning. Because the one thing that's certain about business is that it changes every single day." "And then the fourth thing, when you have that knowledge, when you have that ability to sell,"

Mark Cuban says there are four rules anyone must follow if they want to become a millionaire "If you want to be a millionaire, you can do it. But there's a couple of things you have to be able to accomplish. Rule number one, find something you can be good at and then be great at it." "Second, you have to know how to sell. Whatever it is you're good at, somebody's going to need that service. Someone's going to need that, whatever it is that you're creating. But you have to be able to sell because you don't want to be in a position where you're dependent on other people." "Number three, be curious and always be learning. Because the one thing that's certain about business is that it changes every single day." "And then the fourth thing, when you have that knowledge, when you have that ability to sell,"

Lunix Twin

176,247 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Sylvester Stallone says he turned down $265,000 for Rocky while he only had $106 in the bank "what they didn't count on is when a person hasn't had that type of money, you really don't miss it... if you haven't ridden in a Rolls Royce, you don't mind bouncing around in a Volkswagen" "I knew that if I sold it, even for $500,000, after the money was gone I would become very bitter for having sold out" "my one love was to at least fail on my own terms... I wanted to see if I could act" "we had about $106 in the bank... the rent was $300... I had a pregnant wife" "I wrote the script in about three and a half days because I could hear the wolf at the door literally... it was getting right down to scraping the old bottom of the barrel" ( Originally broadcast 23 January 1977 )

Sylvester Stallone says he turned down $265,000 for Rocky while he only had $106 in the bank "what they didn't count on is when a person hasn't had that type of money, you really don't miss it... if you haven't ridden in a Rolls Royce, you don't mind bouncing around in a Volkswagen" "I knew that if I sold it, even for $500,000, after the money was gone I would become very bitter for having sold out" "my one love was to at least fail on my own terms... I wanted to see if I could act" "we had about $106 in the bank... the rent was $300... I had a pregnant wife" "I wrote the script in about three and a half days because I could hear the wolf at the door literally... it was getting right down to scraping the old bottom of the barrel" ( Originally broadcast 23 January 1977 )

spoiler

687,531 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

1703. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 A man sat in a room and wrote a pamphlet mocking the government. It was so sharp, so clever, both sides believed it was real. When they found out who wrote it, they arrested him. His name was Daniel Defoe. They sentenced him to the pillory. Three days. Three public squares. Your head and hands locked in wood. You couldn’t move. You couldn’t hide. The crowd threw whatever they wanted. Some people died in it. On the first day, the crowd came. Defoe was locked in. He waited for the stones. They threw flowers. They drank to his health. They bought copies of his pamphlet. Right there, in front of the authorities. He served all three days. All three crowds did the same thing. He went home. And kept writing. He wrote Robinson Crusoe. The pillory was abolished in 1837. The people decided it was beneath them. A country that once locked a man in wood for writing the truth… Tore it down because the people said so. Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

1703. 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 A man sat in a room and wrote a pamphlet mocking the government. It was so sharp, so clever, both sides believed it was real. When they found out who wrote it, they arrested him. His name was Daniel Defoe. They sentenced him to the pillory. Three days. Three public squares. Your head and hands locked in wood. You couldn’t move. You couldn’t hide. The crowd threw whatever they wanted. Some people died in it. On the first day, the crowd came. Defoe was locked in. He waited for the stones. They threw flowers. They drank to his health. They bought copies of his pamphlet. Right there, in front of the authorities. He served all three days. All three crowds did the same thing. He went home. And kept writing. He wrote Robinson Crusoe. The pillory was abolished in 1837. The people decided it was beneath them. A country that once locked a man in wood for writing the truth… Tore it down because the people said so. Be part of us. Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

Proudofus.uk

135,963 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Bam Adebayo GOES IN on the critics that says his 83 point game performance is unethical: "For the couch coaches, I mean, if you're in my shoes and you have, first of all, y'all are blaming me. You should be blaming the head coach. Get that first. I was not the one letting me go one-on-one the whole game until I had 70, and then you started to send a double. At that point, I got 70 with, like, what? nine minutes left to go in the game you think i'm not going for it like like and that's the thing that's crazy when they talk about the unethical part of the basketball i'm like if i have 70 points with 9 minutes to go Who would just be like, you know, coach, just take me out. Yeah, right. Anybody in my shoes with nine minutes left? Okay. A minute? All right. Nine? Yeah, I'm going for it. You can't be mad at that. If you are mad, I don't care because a lot of people, they're upset because if they did play, they never had a chance to get that close to chasing greatness. And then if you get that close to chasing greatness, that's the point of chasing it so you can surpass it. And some of the people have never played basketball. So like if you've been in the backyard and you and a couple of your homies have been playing 21 and you got 19. You're not going to get an easy look off. And four, they're going to talk about the free throws. It's not like I shoot 15 free throws a game. It's not like I average 10 free throws a game. You can watch the film. I was legitimately getting fouled every time. So I went to the free throw line."

Ahmed/The Ears/IG: BigBizTheGod 🇸🇴

373,778 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The respect of capital. If you want to be wealthy, you have to respect money. You have to understand where it fits in your life. And you have to understand that the way to get rich is not to spend it, to save it and let it grow. This is the key to success. I've been saying it for decades. You save twenty percent of your income in perpetuity, put it into the market, and you leave it alone. You start doing it in your late twenties, even if you just got the average salary, by the time you're sixty-five, you have one and a half to two million bucks. Stock market does that. You do it. But the reason most people can't is they don't have the discipline to save. They buy too much stuff they don't need.

The respect of capital. If you want to be wealthy, you have to respect money. You have to understand where it fits in your life. And you have to understand that the way to get rich is not to spend it, to save it and let it grow. This is the key to success. I've been saying it for decades. You save twenty percent of your income in perpetuity, put it into the market, and you leave it alone. You start doing it in your late twenties, even if you just got the average salary, by the time you're sixty-five, you have one and a half to two million bucks. Stock market does that. You do it. But the reason most people can't is they don't have the discipline to save. They buy too much stuff they don't need.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

56,849 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

Neil Oliver: "Al Gore and and and the rest of them, they've all got beachfront property...I think the reality is that they know, like the rest of us do, that yes we have climate change, the climate is changeable, the climate is variable like it always has been. But this nonsense about a climate crisis and about a world at boiling point and a world about to burst into flames is errant nonsense." "Putting solar panels everywhere and then the next thing is let's turn down the power of the sun. There's no joined up thinking about it at all. And it is gross hypocrisy. If any of these people meant it, if any of these people, they speak so passionately about the danger that we're all in, they would be living the life themselves as an example. That's how you lead." "It's like Saint Francis of Assisi, you know, was born into wealth. He was he was a rich man's son and he lived the life of a rich man's son until until he got religion, until he got Christianity, and then he gave away everything. And he lived a life of poverty, and he insisted that all of his followers live a life of poverty thereafter. Now that's how you do it. That's that's the way that you get that message across." "You live the life first. And if if by living that life you inspire other people, then they live likewise. But the fact that these people want to preach this nonsense from the bridge of the private jets, or from their goodness only knows what nuclear powered submarines that they want to cut about the world in is just rank hypocrisy." "I've reached a point in my life where I have faith in next to no one. I look out to everyone who's to whom I have to listen on the, coming out of the official mouthpieces. And I find almost all of them completely intolerable."

Neil Oliver: "Al Gore and and and the rest of them, they've all got beachfront property...I think the reality is that they know, like the rest of us do, that yes we have climate change, the climate is changeable, the climate is variable like it always has been. But this nonsense about a climate crisis and about a world at boiling point and a world about to burst into flames is errant nonsense." "Putting solar panels everywhere and then the next thing is let's turn down the power of the sun. There's no joined up thinking about it at all. And it is gross hypocrisy. If any of these people meant it, if any of these people, they speak so passionately about the danger that we're all in, they would be living the life themselves as an example. That's how you lead." "It's like Saint Francis of Assisi, you know, was born into wealth. He was he was a rich man's son and he lived the life of a rich man's son until until he got religion, until he got Christianity, and then he gave away everything. And he lived a life of poverty, and he insisted that all of his followers live a life of poverty thereafter. Now that's how you do it. That's that's the way that you get that message across." "You live the life first. And if if by living that life you inspire other people, then they live likewise. But the fact that these people want to preach this nonsense from the bridge of the private jets, or from their goodness only knows what nuclear powered submarines that they want to cut about the world in is just rank hypocrisy." "I've reached a point in my life where I have faith in next to no one. I look out to everyone who's to whom I have to listen on the, coming out of the official mouthpieces. And I find almost all of them completely intolerable."

Camus

17,019 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST UNLEASHED "Everything they have is so CRAZY, but the fact that they don't want to sign voter ID is another issue, it's a big issue! The fact that they don't have proof of citizenship, that they want transgender for everybody, that they want men in women's sports." "So the only way, they assume, the only way they can win is to cheat!" "When you have men in women's sports, it's fine, it's wonderful. By the way, I worked very hard with the Olympic Committee and got that terminated for the Olympics. Very nice." "Now, girls won't have to get beat up in the boxing ring like they did last time. If you saw those fights, two people that transitioned beat the hell out of everyone, out of other people, women. It was not a pretty sight to watch." "So I worked very hard with the Olympic Committee and we were able to get that out. So the Olympics will not have men in women's sports."

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST UNLEASHED "Everything they have is so CRAZY, but the fact that they don't want to sign voter ID is another issue, it's a big issue! The fact that they don't have proof of citizenship, that they want transgender for everybody, that they want men in women's sports." "So the only way, they assume, the only way they can win is to cheat!" "When you have men in women's sports, it's fine, it's wonderful. By the way, I worked very hard with the Olympic Committee and got that terminated for the Olympics. Very nice." "Now, girls won't have to get beat up in the boxing ring like they did last time. If you saw those fights, two people that transitioned beat the hell out of everyone, out of other people, women. It was not a pretty sight to watch." "So I worked very hard with the Olympic Committee and we were able to get that out. So the Olympics will not have men in women's sports."

Eric Daugherty

16,431 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

"They don't want to be thrown out of the club." Adam Carolla dissects the Hollywood lockstep leftism on display at the Grammys on Sunday: "If those people started saying, we support Trump, guess who's out? Yeah, you’re f*cking out." "Whatever the subject, you guys, here's what it is. And this will prevent you from getting kicked out of the club." "Now we're going to have an award show, and you get up there and whoever praises whatever your policies are the loudest — oh, and by the way, we hate Trump." "So you got to say something sh*tty about him. And then something great about Black Lives Matter or whatever that thing is." "Whoever does that the best is going to stay in the club the longest." "So now you have a decision to make, you know, one of three things. You can either go up there and do ICE out and nobody's illegal. You’ll be fine." “Or you can go up there and just be neutral, not say anything. But that will make people wonder if you should be in the club." “Or you can touch that third rail and say you love ICE and love Trump, in which case you're 100% out and you're going to get booed off the stage." "So why are they all in the exact same place all the time? And the answer is they're not. They don't want to be thrown out of the club.”

"They don't want to be thrown out of the club." Adam Carolla dissects the Hollywood lockstep leftism on display at the Grammys on Sunday: "If those people started saying, we support Trump, guess who's out? Yeah, you’re fcking out." "Whatever the subject, you guys, here's what it is. And this will prevent you from getting kicked out of the club." "Now we're going to have an award show, and you get up there and whoever praises whatever your policies are the loudest — oh, and by the way, we hate Trump." "So you got to say something shtty about him. And then something great about Black Lives Matter or whatever that thing is." "Whoever does that the best is going to stay in the club the longest." "So now you have a decision to make, you know, one of three things. You can either go up there and do ICE out and nobody's illegal. You’ll be fine." “Or you can go up there and just be neutral, not say anything. But that will make people wonder if you should be in the club." “Or you can touch that third rail and say you love ICE and love Trump, in which case you're 100% out and you're going to get booed off the stage." "So why are they all in the exact same place all the time? And the answer is they're not. They don't want to be thrown out of the club.”

Western Lensman

48,008 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

Brian Kight

38,031 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce