正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇮🇷🇮🇱 Tehran vows to send Netanyahu to hell as four different stories compete to explain the CIA's Moscow trip Larry Johnson joined as two fronts heated up at once. First, Iran. With Israel bombing Lebanon daily and telling Washington the pilot-zone program has failed, Iran's top security official Mohsen...

287,645 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Netanyahu lays out Israel's terms for Lebanon after signing of surrender framework agreement, vows Israeli occupation will continue as long as Israel deems necessary —— Following the US-brokered framework agreement with Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israeli occupation forces will withdraw from only two pilot areas, insisting that Israel will remain in its self-declared "security zone" in southern Lebanon "for as long as necessary." Calling it a "tremendous achievement," Netanyahu said international pressure to force an Israeli withdrawal had failed, adding that Israel was "breaking Iran's diplomatic axis." Praising the Lebanese government's decision, Netanyahu described it as "an extremely courageous step," claiming that, for the first time in decades, Lebanon was effectively telling Hezbollah and Iran: "Get out. We're making peace with Israel, whether you like it or not." He claimed the move enjoys support among Lebanese Christians, Druze, Muslims, and even some Shias. Netanyahu also said the Lebanese Armed Forces must reform from within, as "there are jihadist elements within the army," and added that the Lebanese government knows it must deal with the issue, saying, "We will, of course, examine this in practice." Netanyahu also reiterated that Israel was never a party to the US-Iran memorandum of understanding, despite the document stating that it was signed by the United States, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and their allies in the current war. He said Israel nevertheless has its own interests, including on the nuclear issue, and is considering sending a delegation to Washington to present its position. Asked about the long-standing description of Lebanon as a political graveyard for Israeli leaders, Netanyahu dismissed the remark, saying, "Who cares?" He added: "Whether it's a political graveyard or not, I will do whatever is necessary to ensure the security and victory of the State of Israel. If we need to enter Lebanon, we will enter Lebanon. If we need to act forcefully there, we will."

The Cradle

17,355 次观看 • 3 个月前

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

32,717 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇦🇮🇷 Ukraine may have just made the biggest geopolitical gamble of the entire war. Economist Philip Pilkington believes Kyiv has realised the Iran war is swallowing Trump's attention, and has found a dangerous way to force itself back into the conversation. Start with the timing. Ukraine suddenly strikes an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea, Zelensky prepares to meet Trump, Laura Loomer travels to Kyiv and conducts a heavily promoted interview with him, and Trump reposts it. Then, almost overnight, pro-Ukraine voices begin repeating the same line: Iran has been at war with Ukraine since 2022 because it supplied Russia with drones. Philip believes this isn't random. His theory is that Ukraine is trying to reposition itself as useful to Trump’s current priority. The pitch is simple: Keep supporting us, and we will help you pressure Iran. That may be Kyiv’s best chance of regaining priority for U.S weapons, intelligence and political attention as the battlefield situation in Ukraine deteriorates. But Philip warns the strategy could produce something far more dangerous than its architects intend. If Ukraine continues attacking Iranian assets, Tehran may stop treating the Ukraine war and the Iran war as separate conflicts. And Iran has little reason to retaliate by firing missiles at Ukraine because Russia is already pounding Ukrainian territory every day. But Europe is a different matter. European countries manufacture weapons and drones for Ukraine, finance the war and provide the infrastructure that keeps Kyiv fighting. Philip thinks Iran could decide that European weapons factories are legitimate targets under the same logic Ukraine is now using against Iranian assets. Russia can't strike those facilities without risking a direct NATO confrontation, but Iran’s calculation may be different. America is already bombing it, so what additional threat is Europe going to make? Ukraine attacks Iran to regain Trump’s support, Iran retaliates by hitting targets in Europe, then EU governments are forced into the Middle East war. What begins as a clever attempt to win Trump back could end with Europe dragged directly into a war it never intended to fight. Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

331,145 次观看 • 2 个月前

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground

Going Underground

22,956 次观看 • 3 个月前