正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🇮🇷🇮🇱 Tehran vows to send Netanyahu to hell as four different stories compete to explain the CIA's Moscow trip Larry Johnson joined as two fronts heated up at once. First, Iran. With Israel bombing Lebanon daily and telling Washington the pilot-zone program has failed, Iran's top security official Mohsen...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,879,951 subscribers

287,645 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Washington Sent a Warning to Moscow. Putin Heard Weakness: CIA Director John Ratcliffe made an unannounced visit to Moscow on August 25 and met Russian intelligence chiefs. Washington wanted to signal it wasn’t exhausted by the war with Iran - and that a Ukraine-Russia escalation could pull the U.S. in. Signaling like that is risky with Moscow. You never know how the message will land. Putin read it as proof the U.S. was desperate for a deal. Russia then stepped up missile and drone strikes on Ukraine. Before talking to Moscow, you first have to know whether Putin even wants a ceasefire. He almost certainly doesn’t. In that case, nothing you offer matters.
0:55

Washington Sent a Warning to Moscow. Putin Heard Weakness: CIA Director John Ratcliffe made an unannounced visit to Moscow on August 25 and met Russian intelligence chiefs. Washington wanted to signal it wasn’t exhausted by the war with Iran - and that a Ukraine-Russia escalation could pull the U.S. in. Signaling like that is risky with Moscow. You never know how the message will land. Putin read it as proof the U.S. was desperate for a deal. Russia then stepped up missile and drone strikes on Ukraine. Before talking to Moscow, you first have to know whether Putin even wants a ceasefire. He almost certainly doesn’t. In that case, nothing you offer matters.

Global Strategy

16,447 次观看 • 23 天前

🇺🇸🇷🇺 The CIA director owns a private jet, so why did he fly a cargo plane to Moscow? Robert Barnes, Trump's former lawyer, laid out a theory that keeps surfacing across our guests. The director has a Gulfstream with secure communications and range to spare, yet took a C-17. Barnes argues the giveaway is what a C-17 carries that a G5 cannot, and points to a theory first floated by Commodore Steve Jeremy, that the trip was arranged to collect the bodies of CIA officers killed in Ukraine and recovered by Russia, brought home without ceremony. Two more details fuel it. The plane stopped in Riga on the way, which Barnes takes as a sign the Kremlin hadn't yet cleared him to land, and he agreed with the suggestion that Trump dispatched him personally, outside the usual White House channels. Washington and Moscow have both said nothing, four different newspapers printed four different explanations, and Barnes is reasoning from the aircraft backward. His read on why the cover stories came so fast? Because whatever happened in that room, it didn't go well. Brandon Weichert Robert Barnes
56:12

🇺🇸🇷🇺 The CIA director owns a private jet, so why did he fly a cargo plane to Moscow? Robert Barnes, Trump's former lawyer, laid out a theory that keeps surfacing across our guests. The director has a Gulfstream with secure communications and range to spare, yet took a C-17. Barnes argues the giveaway is what a C-17 carries that a G5 cannot, and points to a theory first floated by Commodore Steve Jeremy, that the trip was arranged to collect the bodies of CIA officers killed in Ukraine and recovered by Russia, brought home without ceremony. Two more details fuel it. The plane stopped in Riga on the way, which Barnes takes as a sign the Kremlin hadn't yet cleared him to land, and he agreed with the suggestion that Trump dispatched him personally, outside the usual White House channels. Washington and Moscow have both said nothing, four different newspapers printed four different explanations, and Barnes is reasoning from the aircraft backward. His read on why the cover stories came so fast? Because whatever happened in that room, it didn't go well. Brandon Weichert Robert Barnes

Mario Nawfal

292,363 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇮🇷🇮🇱 What just changed tonight? This is the first time Iran has struck Israel in response to an Israeli strike on a 3rd country. Not Iran itself, but Lebanon. The significance is structural. Iran's deterrence used to mean: strike Iran and Iran strikes back. Tonight it expanded to: strike Lebanon and Iran strikes back. That's a fundamentally different equation. One that extends Iranian hard power as a check on Israeli military action across the entire region, not just over Iranian territory. For decades Israel has operated with near-impunity because no regional power had both the capability and willingness to impose real costs on its military actions abroad. If that equation has genuinely shifted, every conflict in the region, including Palestine, has a new variable in it that wasn't there yesterday. If you still thought Israel is calling the shots think again. Source: Trita Parsi on Substack / Writer: Oliver
1:28

🇮🇷🇮🇱 What just changed tonight? This is the first time Iran has struck Israel in response to an Israeli strike on a 3rd country. Not Iran itself, but Lebanon. The significance is structural. Iran's deterrence used to mean: strike Iran and Iran strikes back. Tonight it expanded to: strike Lebanon and Iran strikes back. That's a fundamentally different equation. One that extends Iranian hard power as a check on Israeli military action across the entire region, not just over Iranian territory. For decades Israel has operated with near-impunity because no regional power had both the capability and willingness to impose real costs on its military actions abroad. If that equation has genuinely shifted, every conflict in the region, including Palestine, has a new variable in it that wasn't there yesterday. If you still thought Israel is calling the shots think again. Source: Trita Parsi on Substack / Writer: Oliver

Mario Nawfal

1,132,211 次观看 • 3 个月前

Netanyahu lays out Israel's terms for Lebanon after signing of surrender framework agreement, vows Israeli occupation will continue as long as Israel deems necessary —— Following the US-brokered framework agreement with Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israeli occupation forces will withdraw from only two pilot areas, insisting that Israel will remain in its self-declared "security zone" in southern Lebanon "for as long as necessary." Calling it a "tremendous achievement," Netanyahu said international pressure to force an Israeli withdrawal had failed, adding that Israel was "breaking Iran's diplomatic axis." Praising the Lebanese government's decision, Netanyahu described it as "an extremely courageous step," claiming that, for the first time in decades, Lebanon was effectively telling Hezbollah and Iran: "Get out. We're making peace with Israel, whether you like it or not." He claimed the move enjoys support among Lebanese Christians, Druze, Muslims, and even some Shias. Netanyahu also said the Lebanese Armed Forces must reform from within, as "there are jihadist elements within the army," and added that the Lebanese government knows it must deal with the issue, saying, "We will, of course, examine this in practice." Netanyahu also reiterated that Israel was never a party to the US-Iran memorandum of understanding, despite the document stating that it was signed by the United States, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and their allies in the current war. He said Israel nevertheless has its own interests, including on the nuclear issue, and is considering sending a delegation to Washington to present its position. Asked about the long-standing description of Lebanon as a political graveyard for Israeli leaders, Netanyahu dismissed the remark, saying, "Who cares?" He added: "Whether it's a political graveyard or not, I will do whatever is necessary to ensure the security and victory of the State of Israel. If we need to enter Lebanon, we will enter Lebanon. If we need to act forcefully there, we will."
0:24

Netanyahu lays out Israel's terms for Lebanon after signing of surrender framework agreement, vows Israeli occupation will continue as long as Israel deems necessary —— Following the US-brokered framework agreement with Lebanon, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israeli occupation forces will withdraw from only two pilot areas, insisting that Israel will remain in its self-declared "security zone" in southern Lebanon "for as long as necessary." Calling it a "tremendous achievement," Netanyahu said international pressure to force an Israeli withdrawal had failed, adding that Israel was "breaking Iran's diplomatic axis." Praising the Lebanese government's decision, Netanyahu described it as "an extremely courageous step," claiming that, for the first time in decades, Lebanon was effectively telling Hezbollah and Iran: "Get out. We're making peace with Israel, whether you like it or not." He claimed the move enjoys support among Lebanese Christians, Druze, Muslims, and even some Shias. Netanyahu also said the Lebanese Armed Forces must reform from within, as "there are jihadist elements within the army," and added that the Lebanese government knows it must deal with the issue, saying, "We will, of course, examine this in practice." Netanyahu also reiterated that Israel was never a party to the US-Iran memorandum of understanding, despite the document stating that it was signed by the United States, the Islamic Republic of Iran, and their allies in the current war. He said Israel nevertheless has its own interests, including on the nuclear issue, and is considering sending a delegation to Washington to present its position. Asked about the long-standing description of Lebanon as a political graveyard for Israeli leaders, Netanyahu dismissed the remark, saying, "Who cares?" He added: "Whether it's a political graveyard or not, I will do whatever is necessary to ensure the security and victory of the State of Israel. If we need to enter Lebanon, we will enter Lebanon. If we need to act forcefully there, we will."

The Cradle

17,355 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israeli generals are leaking that Netanyahu was warned Iran would never fold, and that leak may matter more to the war's next chapter than anything in Washington Most of our guests expect a bigger war this autumn. Robert Barnes thinks that fear rests on three shaky assumptions, and the third is the one nobody is pricing. The first is that America can absorb Iran's counterattacks, when the plan to destroy the launchers first has failed every time it's been tried. The second is that a president under pressure at home can afford another round. The third is Israel. Someone inside the IDF has leaked to the Hebrew press that Netanyahu was told Mossad's forecast of an Iranian collapse was false, that Iran would only harden, and that this was never shared with the CIA. Robert reads it as the pragmatic wing declaring itself, and he notes Israel has finally admitted the Haifa refinery was hit. If Netanyahu is replaced by a general who wants a mission with an exit, the appetite for an existential fight with Iran goes with him. Robert Barnes Brandon Weichert
49:22

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Israeli generals are leaking that Netanyahu was warned Iran would never fold, and that leak may matter more to the war's next chapter than anything in Washington Most of our guests expect a bigger war this autumn. Robert Barnes thinks that fear rests on three shaky assumptions, and the third is the one nobody is pricing. The first is that America can absorb Iran's counterattacks, when the plan to destroy the launchers first has failed every time it's been tried. The second is that a president under pressure at home can afford another round. The third is Israel. Someone inside the IDF has leaked to the Hebrew press that Netanyahu was told Mossad's forecast of an Iranian collapse was false, that Iran would only harden, and that this was never shared with the CIA. Robert reads it as the pragmatic wing declaring itself, and he notes Israel has finally admitted the Haifa refinery was hit. If Netanyahu is replaced by a general who wants a mission with an exit, the appetite for an existential fight with Iran goes with him. Robert Barnes Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

225,562 次观看 • 17 天前

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran met with Trump’s team. Less than 24 hours later, the message from Tehran was brutally simple: enough talking Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi's delegation met indirectly with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner through a mediator at the UN. But anyone hoping that meant a breakthrough may want to temper their expectations. Iran has now publicly laid out what it says must happen next: End aggressive U.S actions and the naval blockade. Release Iran's frozen and restricted assets. Accept a safe shipping arrangement through Hormuz agreed between Iran and Oman. And end the war on all fronts. Then Major General Mohsen Rezaei delivered the harder message: “Enough negotiations. Take action.” According to Rezaei, Iran has seven conditions, and Washington must accept them before Hormuz reopens and negotiations begin. He also warned Trump against another attack, threatened consequences for neighboring countries enforcing restrictions against Iran and again highlighted Tehran's claimed ability to detonate missiles above the USS George Washington. So we now have a fascinating contradiction. Iran is still communicating with Washington. But publicly, Tehran is behaving less like a country trying to negotiate the terms of a deal and more like one waiting for Washington to respond to terms it has already set. Brandon Weichert
50:13

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran met with Trump’s team. Less than 24 hours later, the message from Tehran was brutally simple: enough talking Iran's FM Abbas Araghchi's delegation met indirectly with Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner through a mediator at the UN. But anyone hoping that meant a breakthrough may want to temper their expectations. Iran has now publicly laid out what it says must happen next: End aggressive U.S actions and the naval blockade. Release Iran's frozen and restricted assets. Accept a safe shipping arrangement through Hormuz agreed between Iran and Oman. And end the war on all fronts. Then Major General Mohsen Rezaei delivered the harder message: “Enough negotiations. Take action.” According to Rezaei, Iran has seven conditions, and Washington must accept them before Hormuz reopens and negotiations begin. He also warned Trump against another attack, threatened consequences for neighboring countries enforcing restrictions against Iran and again highlighted Tehran's claimed ability to detonate missiles above the USS George Washington. So we now have a fascinating contradiction. Iran is still communicating with Washington. But publicly, Tehran is behaving less like a country trying to negotiate the terms of a deal and more like one waiting for Washington to respond to terms it has already set. Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

309,459 次观看 • 5 天前

BIG | 🇮🇷🇷🇺🇺🇸🇮🇱‼️‼️ Iran has reportedly turned to Russia for its newest generation of Geran attack drones, completing a remarkable reversal in a military partnership that originally began with Tehran supplying Shahed technology to Moscow for its war against Ukraine. According to the Financial Times, Iran asked Russia this year for advanced Geran drones for use in its ongoing conflict with Israel and the United States. Russia originally developed the Geran family from the Iranian-designed Shahed platform, but years of mass production and battlefield use against Ukraine have allowed Moscow to substantially modify and expand the system into newer variants. The reversal shows how the Russia-Iran military relationship has evolved from a largely one-way transfer of Iranian drone technology into a feedback loop benefiting both states. Ukraine became the testing ground where Moscow refined Iranian-origin systems under real combat conditions, and Tehran is now seeking access to the resulting Russian improvements for its own war. That deepening exchange creates another strategic challenge for Washington and its allies, as technologies developed and refined in one conflict can increasingly migrate into another. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:29

BIG | 🇮🇷🇷🇺🇺🇸🇮🇱‼️‼️ Iran has reportedly turned to Russia for its newest generation of Geran attack drones, completing a remarkable reversal in a military partnership that originally began with Tehran supplying Shahed technology to Moscow for its war against Ukraine. According to the Financial Times, Iran asked Russia this year for advanced Geran drones for use in its ongoing conflict with Israel and the United States. Russia originally developed the Geran family from the Iranian-designed Shahed platform, but years of mass production and battlefield use against Ukraine have allowed Moscow to substantially modify and expand the system into newer variants. The reversal shows how the Russia-Iran military relationship has evolved from a largely one-way transfer of Iranian drone technology into a feedback loop benefiting both states. Ukraine became the testing ground where Moscow refined Iranian-origin systems under real combat conditions, and Tehran is now seeking access to the resulting Russian improvements for its own war. That deepening exchange creates another strategic challenge for Washington and its allies, as technologies developed and refined in one conflict can increasingly migrate into another. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

31,981 次观看 • 15 天前

A US military aircraft quietly landed in Moscow and hours later, reportedly left with CIA Director John Ratcliffe on board. The C-17 reportedly flew from Latvia to Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport before returning to Riga later the same day. Soon after, footage of a diplomatic motorcade emerged. Neither Washington nor Moscow has officially confirmed the purpose of Ratcliffe’s reported visit. Possible explanations include Russia-Ukraine war de-escalation, negotiations over detained Americans, or other sensitive intelligence discussions. But one detail stands out: a senior Ukrainian official reportedly said Kyiv was asked to pause strikes on Russian targets while the US delegation was in Moscow. If true, this suggests the visit may have been far more sensitive than a routine diplomatic trip. So what was the CIA chief doing in Moscow and what was America trying to negotiate? #russia #ukraine #moscow #ukraine #cia #RussiaUkraine
2:46

A US military aircraft quietly landed in Moscow and hours later, reportedly left with CIA Director John Ratcliffe on board. The C-17 reportedly flew from Latvia to Moscow’s Vnukovo Airport before returning to Riga later the same day. Soon after, footage of a diplomatic motorcade emerged. Neither Washington nor Moscow has officially confirmed the purpose of Ratcliffe’s reported visit. Possible explanations include Russia-Ukraine war de-escalation, negotiations over detained Americans, or other sensitive intelligence discussions. But one detail stands out: a senior Ukrainian official reportedly said Kyiv was asked to pause strikes on Russian targets while the US delegation was in Moscow. If true, this suggests the visit may have been far more sensitive than a routine diplomatic trip. So what was the CIA chief doing in Moscow and what was America trying to negotiate? #russia #ukraine #moscow #ukraine #cia #RussiaUkraine

Srijan Pal Singh

10,681 次观看 • 1 个月前

⭕️ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Lebanon Agreement: 🔹“The most important point is that Israel will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon. This is a major achievement, and we will maintain our presence there as long as Hezbollah is not disarmed and as long as there is a threat to the State of Israel.” 🔹”This is also a major blow to Iran. Iran has been trying to force us to withdraw from southern Lebanon through pressure. In effect, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are telling them: this is none of your business. You have no role in Lebanon…” 🔹”We are allowing the Lebanese Army to begin deploying and taking control of territory. We are implementing two pilot zones, both recommended by the IDF: One is entirely outside the security zone, south of the Litani River, and the other is north of the Litani. A small part of that lies within the expanded security zone that we secured over the past two weeks, and which the IDF has made clear it no longer needs.” 🔹”We will continue to maintain the original security zone… We will not allow Hezbollah or civilians to enter it. That remains unchanged.” 🔹”Most importantly, Israel is making one thing clear: our security comes before everything else.”
1:30

⭕️ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Lebanon Agreement: 🔹“The most important point is that Israel will remain in the security zone in southern Lebanon. This is a major achievement, and we will maintain our presence there as long as Hezbollah is not disarmed and as long as there is a threat to the State of Israel.” 🔹”This is also a major blow to Iran. Iran has been trying to force us to withdraw from southern Lebanon through pressure. In effect, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are telling them: this is none of your business. You have no role in Lebanon…” 🔹”We are allowing the Lebanese Army to begin deploying and taking control of territory. We are implementing two pilot zones, both recommended by the IDF: One is entirely outside the security zone, south of the Litani River, and the other is north of the Litani. A small part of that lies within the expanded security zone that we secured over the past two weeks, and which the IDF has made clear it no longer needs.” 🔹”We will continue to maintain the original security zone… We will not allow Hezbollah or civilians to enter it. That remains unchanged.” 🔹”Most importantly, Israel is making one thing clear: our security comes before everything else.”

Drop Site

220,138 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Israel, Iran, Lebanon and the US. Here's the summary of today's escalation: ▪️Israel strikes Beirut suburbs: Israeli forces hit an apartment building in Dahieh, southern Beirut (a key Hezbollah area), killing at least 2 people and wounding others. Israel described it as a targeted operation against Hezbollah infrastructure following rocket and drone attacks from Lebanon. ▪️Iran hits back: Iran launched multiple waves of ballistic missiles and drones at northern Israel, its first direct attack on Israel since the April ceasefire. Israeli defenses intercepted most of the projectiles; no major casualties reported. ▪️Diplomatic fallout: Israeli officials are pushing for retaliation. Trump spoke with Netanyahu and urged restraint to protect ongoing talks with Iran. Israeli media reported Netanyahu appeared open to holding off immediate strikes. ▪️Meanwhile in Iraq: The IRGC conducted drone strikes on Iranian Kurdish opposition targets near Sulaymaniyah in northern Iraq. The region is on fire, and deterrence is being tested. Watch what Israel does before dawn tomorrow.
1:28

🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 Israel, Iran, Lebanon and the US. Here's the summary of today's escalation: ▪️Israel strikes Beirut suburbs: Israeli forces hit an apartment building in Dahieh, southern Beirut (a key Hezbollah area), killing at least 2 people and wounding others. Israel described it as a targeted operation against Hezbollah infrastructure following rocket and drone attacks from Lebanon. ▪️Iran hits back: Iran launched multiple waves of ballistic missiles and drones at northern Israel, its first direct attack on Israel since the April ceasefire. Israeli defenses intercepted most of the projectiles; no major casualties reported. ▪️Diplomatic fallout: Israeli officials are pushing for retaliation. Trump spoke with Netanyahu and urged restraint to protect ongoing talks with Iran. Israeli media reported Netanyahu appeared open to holding off immediate strikes. ▪️Meanwhile in Iraq: The IRGC conducted drone strikes on Iranian Kurdish opposition targets near Sulaymaniyah in northern Iraq. The region is on fire, and deterrence is being tested. Watch what Israel does before dawn tomorrow.

Mario Nawfal

95,355 次观看 • 3 个月前

The unplanned visit by CIA Director John Ratcliffe to Moscow was undoubtedly driven by specific and serious reasons. Upon returning from Moscow, Ratcliffe briefed the U.S. administration on the results of his visit. It is reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were also present at the White House meeting. Presumably, the CIA chief traveled to Moscow to warn Putin against any escalation targeting the Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. According to Politico, Ratcliffe also demanded that Moscow reduce its military and economic support for Iran and stop transfers of weapons and defense technologies. During the talks, the CIA director also reportedly urged Russia not to "overreact" to a possible tightening of sanctions against countries that maintain economic ties with Iran. Judging by the Kremlin’s reaction, it has no intention of reducing or halting the escalation. Do the U.S. and its allies have a Plan B? A rhetorical question.
0:23

The unplanned visit by CIA Director John Ratcliffe to Moscow was undoubtedly driven by specific and serious reasons. Upon returning from Moscow, Ratcliffe briefed the U.S. administration on the results of his visit. It is reported that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Gen. Dan Caine, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, were also present at the White House meeting. Presumably, the CIA chief traveled to Moscow to warn Putin against any escalation targeting the Baltic states - Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. According to Politico, Ratcliffe also demanded that Moscow reduce its military and economic support for Iran and stop transfers of weapons and defense technologies. During the talks, the CIA director also reportedly urged Russia not to "overreact" to a possible tightening of sanctions against countries that maintain economic ties with Iran. Judging by the Kremlin’s reaction, it has no intention of reducing or halting the escalation. Do the U.S. and its allies have a Plan B? A rhetorical question.

Anton Gerashchenko

351,198 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Netanyahu is reportedly bringing Trump fresh intel on Pickaxe Mountain... and the strike it argues for could push Iran to finally build the bomb The leak landed hours before the handshake. According to the New York Post, Netanyahu will present Trump with new intelligence alleging Iran is expanding activity at Pickaxe Mountain, with centrifuges said to have been moved into a fortified site near Natanz. Larry Johnson, thirty years across CIA and State, recognized the pipeline immediately: the same sourcing that has promised quick collapses and easy victories since February and delivered neither. His warning points the opposite direction from the briefing books. Five years ago, polling showed most Iranians opposed the bomb, standing behind their leadership's ruling that it was forbidden. The war reversed that. The prevailing view inside Iran now holds that a bomb was the ONE thing that would have kept the attackers away, and every fresh strike on the nuclear program hardens that conclusion instead of shaking it. Which is why one question hangs over tomorrow's meeting: "What do they do a week later when Iran actually detonates the nuke?" A raid can seal a mountain's doors... It cannot reseal a nation's decision. The strike meant to kill the program may be the strike that completes it. SonofNewAmericanRevolution
51:10

🇮🇱🇮🇷 Netanyahu is reportedly bringing Trump fresh intel on Pickaxe Mountain... and the strike it argues for could push Iran to finally build the bomb The leak landed hours before the handshake. According to the New York Post, Netanyahu will present Trump with new intelligence alleging Iran is expanding activity at Pickaxe Mountain, with centrifuges said to have been moved into a fortified site near Natanz. Larry Johnson, thirty years across CIA and State, recognized the pipeline immediately: the same sourcing that has promised quick collapses and easy victories since February and delivered neither. His warning points the opposite direction from the briefing books. Five years ago, polling showed most Iranians opposed the bomb, standing behind their leadership's ruling that it was forbidden. The war reversed that. The prevailing view inside Iran now holds that a bomb was the ONE thing that would have kept the attackers away, and every fresh strike on the nuclear program hardens that conclusion instead of shaking it. Which is why one question hangs over tomorrow's meeting: "What do they do a week later when Iran actually detonates the nuke?" A raid can seal a mountain's doors... It cannot reseal a nation's decision. The strike meant to kill the program may be the strike that completes it. SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

332,936 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran fired at an aircraft carrier and then explained the rest of the war in one sentence: whoever runs out of missiles first loses Nima Rostami Alkhorshid joined as today's exchange played out, three Iranian tankers disabled after missiles flew at a carrier, and three tankers hit in reply. He reads Tehran as hitting exactly what it aims at, so a handful of missiles at a carrier is a warning: "It's a war, but at the same time it's a game" The game is arithmetic. By his count Jordan burned 87 interceptors stopping about 15 Iranian missiles on Monday, from a reported stock of 800 left across America and Israel, which is why he doubts Israel dares hit Iran despite the holiday-week rumors, and why he reads Washington's silence after three Iranian strikes as empty magazines. Beirut remains Tehran's only stated red line, so it let Israel take the Hezbollah ridge and stayed focused on the strait. That strait is the whole war now: Iran keeps its grip, America keeps the blockade on Iranian ports, and Tehran says it will talk only on the MOU's terms or fight to the last day of this administration. Meanwhile the Gulf hosts are drifting away, Saudi Arabia is seeking an $8 billion loan, and the region is building its own security pact WITHOUT Washington in the room.
44:03

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Iran fired at an aircraft carrier and then explained the rest of the war in one sentence: whoever runs out of missiles first loses Nima Rostami Alkhorshid joined as today's exchange played out, three Iranian tankers disabled after missiles flew at a carrier, and three tankers hit in reply. He reads Tehran as hitting exactly what it aims at, so a handful of missiles at a carrier is a warning: "It's a war, but at the same time it's a game" The game is arithmetic. By his count Jordan burned 87 interceptors stopping about 15 Iranian missiles on Monday, from a reported stock of 800 left across America and Israel, which is why he doubts Israel dares hit Iran despite the holiday-week rumors, and why he reads Washington's silence after three Iranian strikes as empty magazines. Beirut remains Tehran's only stated red line, so it let Israel take the Hezbollah ridge and stayed focused on the strait. That strait is the whole war now: Iran keeps its grip, America keeps the blockade on Iranian ports, and Tehran says it will talk only on the MOU's terms or fight to the last day of this administration. Meanwhile the Gulf hosts are drifting away, Saudi Arabia is seeking an $8 billion loan, and the region is building its own security pact WITHOUT Washington in the room.

Mario Nawfal

326,811 次观看 • 23 天前

Ukrainian volunteer from Mariupol, Mykhailo Puryshev, said Russia’s FSB is blackmailing him by threatening his son, who lives in Russia, with either death or being sent to the front to fight against Ukraine. He said on social media that he was given two options: cooperate with the FSB and betray Ukraine, or refuse and lose his son. Mykhailo decided to go to Russia and try to save his son. "Once I’m in their hands, they can do whatever they want with me. But my son will live. And I hope they’ll leave him alone," he said. At the end of the video, the volunteer’s team said that at the time of publication, he was already on a plane to Moscow, where he was expected to undergo Russian "filtration." It is currently unknown where Mykhailo is after arriving in Russia or whether he managed to meet his son. Mykhailo has four children: two live in Ukraine and two in Russia. Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, Mykhailo has helped evacuate civilians from besieged Mariupol and assisted the Ukrainian Forces. In 2025, he joined Ukraine’s Defense Forces but was later discharged on health grounds. 📹: mykhailo.puryshev / Instagram
2:56

Ukrainian volunteer from Mariupol, Mykhailo Puryshev, said Russia’s FSB is blackmailing him by threatening his son, who lives in Russia, with either death or being sent to the front to fight against Ukraine. He said on social media that he was given two options: cooperate with the FSB and betray Ukraine, or refuse and lose his son. Mykhailo decided to go to Russia and try to save his son. "Once I’m in their hands, they can do whatever they want with me. But my son will live. And I hope they’ll leave him alone," he said. At the end of the video, the volunteer’s team said that at the time of publication, he was already on a plane to Moscow, where he was expected to undergo Russian "filtration." It is currently unknown where Mykhailo is after arriving in Russia or whether he managed to meet his son. Mykhailo has four children: two live in Ukraine and two in Russia. Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, Mykhailo has helped evacuate civilians from besieged Mariupol and assisted the Ukrainian Forces. In 2025, he joined Ukraine’s Defense Forces but was later discharged on health grounds. 📹: mykhailo.puryshev / Instagram

Anton Gerashchenko

50,523 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇮🇱🇮🇷 The nightmare scenario is not Iran firing back. It is what Israel might do after that. Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern says the chain is brutally simple: Israel keeps escalating, Iran eventually strikes harder, Israeli defenses run thin, and Netanyahu faces what he sees as an existential threat. “Israel may end up with an existential choice as to whether to use nuclear weapons.” He argues that anyone assuming Netanyahu would never cross that line should look at what he has already been willing to do in Gaza, Lebanon, and beyond. Once a leader believes survival is on the table, the old rules may stop mattering. Ray McGovern
2:22

🇮🇱🇮🇷 The nightmare scenario is not Iran firing back. It is what Israel might do after that. Former CIA analyst Ray McGovern says the chain is brutally simple: Israel keeps escalating, Iran eventually strikes harder, Israeli defenses run thin, and Netanyahu faces what he sees as an existential threat. “Israel may end up with an existential choice as to whether to use nuclear weapons.” He argues that anyone assuming Netanyahu would never cross that line should look at what he has already been willing to do in Gaza, Lebanon, and beyond. Once a leader believes survival is on the table, the old rules may stop mattering. Ray McGovern

Mario Nawfal

79,409 次观看 • 3 个月前

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 The United States is reportedly preparing for a large-scale military campaign against Iran that would go far beyond a limited retaliatory strike, according to Israeli outlet i24NEWS. The report states that Washington's preparations are not intended as a response to yesterday's attack, but rather as part of a broader, pre-planned military operation with significantly wider objectives. 🔹 According to the report, Israel is increasingly concerned that Iran could launch direct attacks against Israeli territory if upcoming U.S. operations cross what Tehran considers its strategic red lines. The reported preparations point to the possibility of a major escalation that could fundamentally reshape the regional security environment. If Washington moves beyond limited punitive strikes toward a sustained military campaign, Iran would likely face strong pressure to respond against both American and Israeli targets, increasing the risk that the conflict expands into a broader regional war involving multiple fronts and allied proxy forces. See the latest updates with us: Visioner
0:30

‼️🇺🇸🇮🇷🇮🇱 The United States is reportedly preparing for a large-scale military campaign against Iran that would go far beyond a limited retaliatory strike, according to Israeli outlet i24NEWS. The report states that Washington's preparations are not intended as a response to yesterday's attack, but rather as part of a broader, pre-planned military operation with significantly wider objectives. 🔹 According to the report, Israel is increasingly concerned that Iran could launch direct attacks against Israeli territory if upcoming U.S. operations cross what Tehran considers its strategic red lines. The reported preparations point to the possibility of a major escalation that could fundamentally reshape the regional security environment. If Washington moves beyond limited punitive strikes toward a sustained military campaign, Iran would likely face strong pressure to respond against both American and Israeli targets, increasing the risk that the conflict expands into a broader regional war involving multiple fronts and allied proxy forces. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

50,596 次观看 • 2 个月前

🇮🇷 The "defeated" Iran is exporting MORE oil than before the war, at a 20% premium. Fmr. CIA analyst Larry Johnson tears into the narrative that Iran's leadership has been eliminated and its military has capitulated, dismissing it all as delusional fantasies. The numbers back him up. Iran's oil exports climbed from 1.4 million barrels per day in February 2026 to 1.6 million now, and Tehran is pocketing a 20% premium on every sale. The military picture tells the same story. Larry says Iran's ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones remain intact and fully operational, proven by the recent large-scale retaliatory strike Iran unleashed in response to US military action. SonofNewAmericanRevolution
1:35

🇮🇷 The "defeated" Iran is exporting MORE oil than before the war, at a 20% premium. Fmr. CIA analyst Larry Johnson tears into the narrative that Iran's leadership has been eliminated and its military has capitulated, dismissing it all as delusional fantasies. The numbers back him up. Iran's oil exports climbed from 1.4 million barrels per day in February 2026 to 1.6 million now, and Tehran is pocketing a 20% premium on every sale. The military picture tells the same story. Larry says Iran's ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones remain intact and fully operational, proven by the recent large-scale retaliatory strike Iran unleashed in response to US military action. SonofNewAmericanRevolution

Mario Nawfal

83,723 次观看 • 2 个月前

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇
3:06

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford Watch the full interview in the quoted post below👇

Going Underground

32,717 次观看 • 4 个月前

🇺🇦🇮🇷 Ukraine may have just made the biggest geopolitical gamble of the entire war. Economist Philip Pilkington believes Kyiv has realised the Iran war is swallowing Trump's attention, and has found a dangerous way to force itself back into the conversation. Start with the timing. Ukraine suddenly strikes an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea, Zelensky prepares to meet Trump, Laura Loomer travels to Kyiv and conducts a heavily promoted interview with him, and Trump reposts it. Then, almost overnight, pro-Ukraine voices begin repeating the same line: Iran has been at war with Ukraine since 2022 because it supplied Russia with drones. Philip believes this isn't random. His theory is that Ukraine is trying to reposition itself as useful to Trump’s current priority. The pitch is simple: Keep supporting us, and we will help you pressure Iran. That may be Kyiv’s best chance of regaining priority for U.S weapons, intelligence and political attention as the battlefield situation in Ukraine deteriorates. But Philip warns the strategy could produce something far more dangerous than its architects intend. If Ukraine continues attacking Iranian assets, Tehran may stop treating the Ukraine war and the Iran war as separate conflicts. And Iran has little reason to retaliate by firing missiles at Ukraine because Russia is already pounding Ukrainian territory every day. But Europe is a different matter. European countries manufacture weapons and drones for Ukraine, finance the war and provide the infrastructure that keeps Kyiv fighting. Philip thinks Iran could decide that European weapons factories are legitimate targets under the same logic Ukraine is now using against Iranian assets. Russia can't strike those facilities without risking a direct NATO confrontation, but Iran’s calculation may be different. America is already bombing it, so what additional threat is Europe going to make? Ukraine attacks Iran to regain Trump’s support, Iran retaliates by hitting targets in Europe, then EU governments are forced into the Middle East war. What begins as a clever attempt to win Trump back could end with Europe dragged directly into a war it never intended to fight. Philip Pilkington
30:46

🇺🇦🇮🇷 Ukraine may have just made the biggest geopolitical gamble of the entire war. Economist Philip Pilkington believes Kyiv has realised the Iran war is swallowing Trump's attention, and has found a dangerous way to force itself back into the conversation. Start with the timing. Ukraine suddenly strikes an Iranian vessel in the Caspian Sea, Zelensky prepares to meet Trump, Laura Loomer travels to Kyiv and conducts a heavily promoted interview with him, and Trump reposts it. Then, almost overnight, pro-Ukraine voices begin repeating the same line: Iran has been at war with Ukraine since 2022 because it supplied Russia with drones. Philip believes this isn't random. His theory is that Ukraine is trying to reposition itself as useful to Trump’s current priority. The pitch is simple: Keep supporting us, and we will help you pressure Iran. That may be Kyiv’s best chance of regaining priority for U.S weapons, intelligence and political attention as the battlefield situation in Ukraine deteriorates. But Philip warns the strategy could produce something far more dangerous than its architects intend. If Ukraine continues attacking Iranian assets, Tehran may stop treating the Ukraine war and the Iran war as separate conflicts. And Iran has little reason to retaliate by firing missiles at Ukraine because Russia is already pounding Ukrainian territory every day. But Europe is a different matter. European countries manufacture weapons and drones for Ukraine, finance the war and provide the infrastructure that keeps Kyiv fighting. Philip thinks Iran could decide that European weapons factories are legitimate targets under the same logic Ukraine is now using against Iranian assets. Russia can't strike those facilities without risking a direct NATO confrontation, but Iran’s calculation may be different. America is already bombing it, so what additional threat is Europe going to make? Ukraine attacks Iran to regain Trump’s support, Iran retaliates by hitting targets in Europe, then EU governments are forced into the Middle East war. What begins as a clever attempt to win Trump back could end with Europe dragged directly into a war it never intended to fight. Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

331,145 次观看 • 2 个月前

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground
3:06

Israeli-British Historian Prof. Avi Shlaim: ‘The Trump-Netanyahu war on Iran is one of the most UNJUSTIFIED, SENSELESS and FOOLISH wars of the 21st century. There was absolutely no reason to go to war. This is an unlawful war. There was no Security Council resolution that mandated a war on Iran. There was no imminent threat from Iran to either Israel or America. So it was a decision taken by these two leaders to launch an attack on Iran. And the dominant personality here is Netanyahu. He’s the junior partner, but he’s the real architect of this war. He succeeded in dragging America into the war on Iran. And remember that Netanyahu was first elected as prime minister in 1996. For the last 30 years, Netanyahu has been demonising Iran and calling for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities. But no American president until Trump was stupid enough to fall for it. Now, Trump went along with this plan by Netanyahu, and we have seen the consequences. It’s been a war that has caused immense damage and destruction, inflicted a lot of suffering on civilians, and not just in Iran, but on Lebanon as well. And at the same time, Israel continues the genocide in Gaza and the ethnic cleansing of the West Bank. So what we are seeing is an Israeli success in dragging America into a war which is damaging to America, damaging to America’s Gulf allies, hugely damaging to the international economy, and undermines international law.’ -Prof. Avi Shlaim, Emeritus Professor of International Relations at the University of Oxford, on Going Underground

Going Underground

22,956 次观看 • 3 个月前