Terms like “settled science”, “computer model projections”, and “conference negotiations” make up the majority of curriculum for future climate science graduates. Smells like brainwashing to me!!!!

I admit to being brainwashed in the laws of physics by taking a physics degree at Oxford in 1976. I admit to being brainwashed in the precepts of the modern scientific method by taking a PhD in Physics at Imperial in 1980.

You and your fellow illiterate cattle are free to show your working disproving the scientific consensus any time you like.

Fake “climate scientist” Anika Sweetland (aka Anika Sherborne) had a previous scam as a “Quantum Healer” where she claimed to “heal remotely.” Her “Energetic Alchemist” website is now defunct but lives on at:

Aren't you the former model and event planner who has no scientific education? Everything is a model (see, you weren't so special) from how we run businesses to how we design bridges.

What was your degree in? Any chance of providing the degree certificate please?

People who think that climate researchers don't understand climate science well enough to produce accurate models can develop their own models and make predictions that, if they are correct, will be even MORE accurate.

You are ignorant. Lol.

You're serving word salad with disinformation dressing.🤨 FYI, aside from many other replies here pointing out your inability to grasp climate science doesn't disprove the entire field, you work for the CO2 Coalition, a fossil fuel industry mouthpiece:

You silly sausage 🤣

No such thing as settled science it`s only settled until something new comes along that proves differently. That`s the entire ethos of science.

Bullshit queen. Who pays you for this?

That is simply not true.

“Oh my God, like this climate stuff is SOOOO hard to understand, like what’s carbon dioxide. I had to take Chem 101 for my marketing degree and it was like total geek stuff, like who cares about molecules, I have some cute frat boys to hook up with!”

Inaccurate and misleading. Your video and post present a false dichotomy: either pure hypothesis-testing with zero policy context, or indoctrination. Real science education includes both fundamentals and applications. Dissenting views exist and are published (though rare in climate attribution); the field isn’t monolithic. Climate science rests on observable data and established physics, not faith in models or summits. Programs should prepare graduates for research, data analysis, and informed decision-making, not uncritical activism. Your post exaggerates for effect and doesn’t hold up against actual program structures very well, does it? Follow REAL data and findings. Not Anika and the CO2 Coalition. #ClimateBrawl

Fortunately for science your understanding is not a prerequisite....

Smells like someone skiped their algebra classes to me!!!!

An evidence free manufactured crisis for political purposes. But scientists are the same as everyone else. They have a mortgage to pay and families to feed. But climate science now is not an argument over data, it is an argument over VIRTUE, and being virtuous will land you a job, whereas being accurate probably won't.

You are a brainless ape.

Making it really hard to dissipate the dumb blonde stereotype...

IMO and WMO for DEIC and BEIC Jakarta and India colonial control and NSSM 200 Intergovernmental from 1919 predates the war with Postal Service Reichelderfer to ENMOD to MEDEA and JASOn gordon Macdoanld Harrison brown Paul ehrlich verhulst Raymond pearl.

The history of climate alarm is transhuman eugenics nightmare of NSSM 200 Rockefeller Determinism based on X Club Huxley Tyndal and Greg Bateson OSS letters to Donovan to keep India in control he said worse. David Price Weaponized Anthropology nothing else. They don't even know their origins!

History of Technocracy, cybernetics, DARPA, CIA and Climate Alarm Includes Walter Scott, Howard Scott, Joshua Haldeman, Elon Musk, Lithium vs. Aluminum, Margret Mead, William Welch Kellog, Rockefeller, NSSM 200 and Greg Bateson – Media Logging

Yeah, let's make up a curriculum with stuff we don't know! I mean professors should be clairvoyant, not just present their students with research challenges.

This was labelled 'sensitive content'.

Also smells like manipulation and exploitation of raw data to serve one's own purpose.

Exactly cybernetic apparatus from Determinism Malthusian BS mostly if you look at Greg Bateson Von Nuemann history and Bell Labs Unchained Goddess after pv panels limits to growth NSSm 200 enmod treaty