正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Tested DeepSeek V4 Flash on ZenMux today Tried a more practical approach instead of just chatting. → Asked it to build a SaaS landing page → Generated full HTML, CSS, JS → Ran the code → got a working UI It handled layout, components, and styling pretty smoothly. Iteration...

Shruti_0810's profile picture

Shruti Codes

107,495 subscribers

69,532 次观看 • 4 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

I connected Pika MCP to Claude and made a full UGC ad video just by chatting normally. This is the kind of AI workflow that actually feels useful. From one idea to a ready ad in minutes. You can now give Claude a face, voice, name, and personality. It can also create podcasts, UGC ads, explainers, and more from a single prompt. Pika-fy your Claude Here’s how I did it :
0:45

I connected Pika MCP to Claude and made a full UGC ad video just by chatting normally. This is the kind of AI workflow that actually feels useful. From one idea to a ready ad in minutes. You can now give Claude a face, voice, name, and personality. It can also create podcasts, UGC ads, explainers, and more from a single prompt. Pika-fy your Claude Here’s how I did it :

aditii

168,270 次观看 • 3 个月前

My favorite way of interacting with Claude Code is to have it generate static HTML files as outputs (reports, explorations, code structure, mockups etc.) I wanted to iterate on the file by commenting in browser and having Claude update the output live. So, I built this Claude Skill👇 How it works: - Install Claude Code skill (ask it to clone repo) - Build an HTML page for anything (e.g. research coding agents and generate HTML report) - Ask it to make the page interactive That's it. CC will launch a localhost server and allow you to then leave comments on the page itself and once it updates, will give you a tour of changes. It's like Google Docs kind of comments/iteration but for HTML pages.
0:55

My favorite way of interacting with Claude Code is to have it generate static HTML files as outputs (reports, explorations, code structure, mockups etc.) I wanted to iterate on the file by commenting in browser and having Claude update the output live. So, I built this Claude Skill👇 How it works: - Install Claude Code skill (ask it to clone repo) - Build an HTML page for anything (e.g. research coding agents and generate HTML report) - Ask it to make the page interactive That's it. CC will launch a localhost server and allow you to then leave comments on the page itself and once it updates, will give you a tour of changes. It's like Google Docs kind of comments/iteration but for HTML pages.

Paras Chopra

215,661 次观看 • 3 个月前

You don’t need a dev team anymore. You need one prompt. Zoer takes your idea and turns it into a fully working app, not just code, but a real product you can use. Here’s what it handles for you: • Database (already structured) • Backend (logic + APIs) • Frontend (clean, production-ready UI) • Auth (Google + email login) • Deployment (live in one click) Most AI tools stop at “here’s your code.” Zoer goes further: It builds the entire system and puts it live. From: “build me a CRM / SaaS / tool” To: A real, working product you can open, test, and share. Try it → No setup. No configs. No extra tools. This is what building should feel like in 2026.
0:53

You don’t need a dev team anymore. You need one prompt. Zoer takes your idea and turns it into a fully working app, not just code, but a real product you can use. Here’s what it handles for you: • Database (already structured) • Backend (logic + APIs) • Frontend (clean, production-ready UI) • Auth (Google + email login) • Deployment (live in one click) Most AI tools stop at “here’s your code.” Zoer goes further: It builds the entire system and puts it live. From: “build me a CRM / SaaS / tool” To: A real, working product you can open, test, and share. Try it → No setup. No configs. No extra tools. This is what building should feel like in 2026.

Tanvir

18,160 次观看 • 4 个月前

Take any Python code and build a dynamic GUI on top of it by dragging and dropping components. Python is already the most popular language in the world. This makes it even better! The attached video is only 45 seconds. It will show you how it works. Here is the important part: You can now build an interface for your Python code without learning HTML, JavaScript, or CSS. Go to this link to try this: Remember to work smarter, not harder! Thanks to the team behind Taipy for partnering with me on this post.
0:45

Take any Python code and build a dynamic GUI on top of it by dragging and dropping components. Python is already the most popular language in the world. This makes it even better! The attached video is only 45 seconds. It will show you how it works. Here is the important part: You can now build an interface for your Python code without learning HTML, JavaScript, or CSS. Go to this link to try this: Remember to work smarter, not harder! Thanks to the team behind Taipy for partnering with me on this post.

Santiago

155,254 次观看 • 2 年前

most people spend hours describing what they want to Claude Code this guy just browsed a catalog of thousands of animated UI components, found one he liked, and hit "copy prompt" that's it. the prompt goes into Claude Code and it builds it. > 21st(.)dev - a library of community-made components built for React, Next.js, Tailwind > every component has a ready-made prompt attached > you pick the effect, copy, paste, done no describing animations from scratch. no explaining what "smooth scroll" or "hover glow" means. someone already figured out the exact prompt that produces it. gap between people who know this exists and people who don't is measured in hours per project full walkthrough in the article below
0:41

most people spend hours describing what they want to Claude Code this guy just browsed a catalog of thousands of animated UI components, found one he liked, and hit "copy prompt" that's it. the prompt goes into Claude Code and it builds it. > 21st(.)dev - a library of community-made components built for React, Next.js, Tailwind > every component has a ready-made prompt attached > you pick the effect, copy, paste, done no describing animations from scratch. no explaining what "smooth scroll" or "hover glow" means. someone already figured out the exact prompt that produces it. gap between people who know this exists and people who don't is measured in hours per project full walkthrough in the article below

monokern

64,484 次观看 • 1 个月前

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.
1:34

FIRST TEST Seedance 2.0! From my initial tests, this is one of the more impressive AI video models I’ve tried so far. Dynamic motion feels fluid, prompt adherence is solid, and the efficiency really stood out, very little iteration needed. Everything you see here was generated using just one reference image + one prompt. I also tested a 3×3 image grid with no prompt at all, and the results stayed surprisingly consistent. Another highlight: sound design is already included, and it actually works really well. Tested via BytePlus 👉 More detail and access link to try Seedance 2.0 is in the comments.

Dinda Prasetyo

45,450 次观看 • 6 个月前

Most AI video tools still feel like traditional editors with a few AI features added in. You still end up adjusting timelines, fixing frames, and spending time editing. But Hailuo AI felt different to me. I gave it a simple prompt and one image, and it generated a full video on its own. No complicated workflow, no manual editing just idea to video in minutes. The text-to-video results are surprisingly good, image-to-video transitions look smooth, and the overall output feels cinematic. What I liked most is the speed. You can quickly test ideas without getting stuck in editing. Try it here: #Hailuo
0:23

Most AI video tools still feel like traditional editors with a few AI features added in. You still end up adjusting timelines, fixing frames, and spending time editing. But Hailuo AI felt different to me. I gave it a simple prompt and one image, and it generated a full video on its own. No complicated workflow, no manual editing just idea to video in minutes. The text-to-video results are surprisingly good, image-to-video transitions look smooth, and the overall output feels cinematic. What I liked most is the speed. You can quickly test ideas without getting stuck in editing. Try it here: #Hailuo

Markandey Sharma

32,326 次观看 • 3 个月前

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below
1:22:03

Boris Cherny, the creator of Claude Code, just explained why the features most users never find are the ones that matter most in this podcast he breaks down not just how to use Claude, but what it all means for the next few years: > the right way to give Claude context before it starts working > why giving it too much information is just as bad as too little > how Claude Code is already changing how engineers build things > how the people who built Claude actually use it day to day based on this podcast and months of using Claude myself, I put together a guide on everything Claude can do that most people have no idea exists you can find it below

Anatoli Kopadze

22,524 次观看 • 3 个月前

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)
1:18

I just compared Claude Code vs Codex vs Cursor CLI The task was to build a Next.js app with Tailwind 4 and shadcn components to collect customer feedback and showcase it with a widget. I gave all three the same prompt and let them go for 30 minutes to see what they came up with. Claude Code with Opus 4.1 Even though I told it to set up the app in the existing project folder, it tried to create a directory for it. After I interrupted and told it not to do that, it built a demo form and landing page with no errors. I had to ask it to make the demo interactive so users could submit a testimonial and preview it. The landing page looked like AI and was pretty basic, but it worked and it was done in a fraction of the time of the others. Total tokens used: 33k Codex with GPT-5 At the end of the 30 minutes I just could not get Codex to produce a working app. It got stuck in a loop of not being able to set up Tailwind 4 and despite many, MANY, attempts, I ended up with a "failed to compile" error. Total tokens used: 102k Cursor Agent with GPT-5 This was the slowest agent by far and a couple of times I actually thought it got stuck in a loop and was close to Ctrl+C'ing to cancel it. The TUI is really nice though, especially how it shows diffs and it did eventually build a working app (after one or two slight errors that needed fixing) The demo was interactive and it had a very minimal design that looked bare but also a lot less like an "AI generated" app than the Opus 4.1 design. It also wasn't too chatty and just did what it needed to do! Code quality was on a par with Opus 4.1, but it did use 5.5x as many tokens to get there. Still cheaper than Opus on a direct comparison but not when you factor in a Claude Code Max subscription. Total tokens: 188k I'll be able to do a proper comparison and record some videos when I'm back from holiday but for now, Opus is still the more capable model out of the box and Claude Code is the more complete CLI product. It will be interesting to see how Cursor evolve their CLI though with commands and subagents because I think with GPT-5 they have a real shot at providing competition for Claude Code if they can optimise output to get similar quality with less tokens. Jump to 0:40 in the video to see the two apps. Which do you think is which? ;)

Ian Nuttall

195,173 次观看 • 1 年前

Grok Code just literally cloned the entire Netflix UI with a one shot prompt From the iconic Hero section to the interactive Carousel, all with a single prompt and a few web-sourced image links It’s not just fast, it's the most cost-effective SOTA model out there ➝ Input: Grok $0.20 vs Claude $3 (15x cheaper) ➝ Output: Grok $1.50 vs Claude $15 (10x cheaper) Here’s how you can do it in VS Code with Kilo Code Grok Code matches Claude Sonnet 4 in performance, but is 10-15x more cost-effective All this for less than $1 SOTA power, fractional cost
1:23

Grok Code just literally cloned the entire Netflix UI with a one shot prompt From the iconic Hero section to the interactive Carousel, all with a single prompt and a few web-sourced image links It’s not just fast, it's the most cost-effective SOTA model out there ➝ Input: Grok $0.20 vs Claude $3 (15x cheaper) ➝ Output: Grok $1.50 vs Claude $15 (10x cheaper) Here’s how you can do it in VS Code with Kilo Code Grok Code matches Claude Sonnet 4 in performance, but is 10-15x more cost-effective All this for less than $1 SOTA power, fractional cost

X Freeze

6,973,348 次观看 • 11 个月前

I just created this 36-second video in just five minutes with a simple prompt using Agent Mode in Grok Imagine All it took was a simple prompt, and it was made in just five minutes With a single image, it can generate matching scenes from different angles, build a full visual storyline, and even add subtitles. Grok Imagine Agent is one of the best tools for visual storytelling It's amazing how quickly you can now bring an idea to life just by expressing it in a few words The barrier between imagination and creation is getting smaller every day
0:36

I just created this 36-second video in just five minutes with a simple prompt using Agent Mode in Grok Imagine All it took was a simple prompt, and it was made in just five minutes With a single image, it can generate matching scenes from different angles, build a full visual storyline, and even add subtitles. Grok Imagine Agent is one of the best tools for visual storytelling It's amazing how quickly you can now bring an idea to life just by expressing it in a few words The barrier between imagination and creation is getting smaller every day

X Freeze

26,390 次观看 • 1 个月前

My ideas used to stay stuck at the script stage. Writing scenes was easy, but turning them into actual animated shots always felt heavy. Too many tools. Too much technical friction. The story would lose momentum halfway through. That changed when I spent time exploring CineV | 3D-Controlled AI Animation. What clicked for me was how it starts from a story, not a timeline or a blank canvas. You write first, then it builds a storyboard around that idea. From there, you can review shots, regenerate scenes, adjust expressions, tweak camera angles, and refine motion instead of accepting one random output. I found myself thinking more like a director than a prompt engineer. Choosing what shots worked, pacing scenes, and polishing moments without needing to animate everything from scratch. Less friction. Fewer compromises. More control over the final result. What stood out next was the flexibility. There’s a faster text to video flow when speed matters, and a more hands on storyboard and 3D edit mode when you care about camera work and continuity. You decide how deep you want to go. It still feels early and very creator focused, but the full workflow from script to export is already there. CineV feels less like a clip generator and more like a storytelling tool for anime style animation. Worth a look if you work with narrative ideas and want them to actually turn into finished scenes. Try it here:
0:43

My ideas used to stay stuck at the script stage. Writing scenes was easy, but turning them into actual animated shots always felt heavy. Too many tools. Too much technical friction. The story would lose momentum halfway through. That changed when I spent time exploring CineV | 3D-Controlled AI Animation. What clicked for me was how it starts from a story, not a timeline or a blank canvas. You write first, then it builds a storyboard around that idea. From there, you can review shots, regenerate scenes, adjust expressions, tweak camera angles, and refine motion instead of accepting one random output. I found myself thinking more like a director than a prompt engineer. Choosing what shots worked, pacing scenes, and polishing moments without needing to animate everything from scratch. Less friction. Fewer compromises. More control over the final result. What stood out next was the flexibility. There’s a faster text to video flow when speed matters, and a more hands on storyboard and 3D edit mode when you care about camera work and continuity. You decide how deep you want to go. It still feels early and very creator focused, but the full workflow from script to export is already there. CineV feels less like a clip generator and more like a storytelling tool for anime style animation. Worth a look if you work with narrative ideas and want them to actually turn into finished scenes. Try it here:

FELIX

122,203 次观看 • 7 个月前

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.
0:37

THIS GUY SPENT 5 MINUTES SETTING UP A $20 CLAUDE WORKSPACE AND TURNED 30 MINUTES OF DAILY PROMPT CHAOS INTO A SYSTEM Most people open Claude, type 1 messy prompt, rewrite it 10 times, get the same generic answer and call the model “bad.” He opens Claude Cowork, adds the project rules, past context, working files, examples, decisions and a clean place for the model to remember what it is doing. Same Claude. Same $20 tool. Completely different output. The funny part is there is no magic prompt here. No secret template. No “10x Claude” trick. Just the boring layer Karpathy keeps pointing at: context, memory and structure before output. A setup like this can save 30 minutes a day, which is 15 hours a month. If you use Claude for client work at $50 to $100/hour, that is $750 to $1,500/month in time you stop burning on repeated prompts. The model is real. The output is real. The edge is in not making Claude start from zero every single time.

Gipp 🦅

14,871 次观看 • 3 个月前

✨ To inspire more people to go build something now that we have AI to help us (especially non-tech people, cause I still know so many who are scared of building something): I added a [ BUILD IT ] button to It's like a mini-Lovable/Replit/v0: Any idea you see you like, you can click [ BUILD IT ], and it will use Opus 4.6 to build a landing page for it And then you can download the code it generated It's not a full startup of course, but a nice preview of what it can be, to give you an idea and inspire you to build it out further The code is live streamed also so you can see it being built 😊 Ironically this itself took me 1 hour to build with AI too Completely free and I pay for the tokens (please don't abuse it :D)
0:55

✨ To inspire more people to go build something now that we have AI to help us (especially non-tech people, cause I still know so many who are scared of building something): I added a [ BUILD IT ] button to It's like a mini-Lovable/Replit/v0: Any idea you see you like, you can click [ BUILD IT ], and it will use Opus 4.6 to build a landing page for it And then you can download the code it generated It's not a full startup of course, but a nice preview of what it can be, to give you an idea and inspire you to build it out further The code is live streamed also so you can see it being built 😊 Ironically this itself took me 1 hour to build with AI too Completely free and I pay for the tokens (please don't abuse it :D)

@levelsio

277,278 次观看 • 5 个月前

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!
1:02

Over the past year, a lot of the conversation has been around how quickly AI is changing the digital world. At the same time, it made us think about how little has changed in the physical one. Most products are still designed the same way, just with more features layered on top. We wanted to explore a different direction at Lusion. Instead of asking how to add intelligence, we asked what happens if you take things away. What remains when you strip a product back to its core purpose, and design it properly from there. Oryzo is our first attempt at that. It is a physical product, built with a very simple idea of how it should exist and behave. No dependency on external systems, no complexity for the sake of it. Just something that feels considered. Curious to hear what people think. Link is in the comment!

Lusion™

87,350 次观看 • 5 个月前

claude opus 4.5 is finally here, so we tested it against gemini 3 to see which one is the better at vibe coding we took a new startup idea and went from idea to landing page to prototype to ad creative in one sitting. you also see how The Boring Marketer uses claude skills to get the most out of claude opus 4.5 (and how you can do the same). if you’re wondering whether opus 4.5 is worth using, this 1hr tutorial will help you decide and learn how to get the most from it.
59:42

claude opus 4.5 is finally here, so we tested it against gemini 3 to see which one is the better at vibe coding we took a new startup idea and went from idea to landing page to prototype to ad creative in one sitting. you also see how The Boring Marketer uses claude skills to get the most out of claude opus 4.5 (and how you can do the same). if you’re wondering whether opus 4.5 is worth using, this 1hr tutorial will help you decide and learn how to get the most from it.

GREG ISENBERG

84,982 次观看 • 9 个月前

Claude Code + computer use is f*cking cracked 🤯 Build a landing page → Claude opens Chrome, looks at it, spots every issue, and fixes it — without you describing a single thing. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still vibe-coding landing pages and advertorials in Claude Code, then manually opening them in Chrome, spotting 15 things wrong, and describing every visual issue back to Claude one at a time. If you're building pages in Claude Code and your workflow looks like this — build the page, open it in Chrome, spot broken spacing, go back to Claude, type "the CTA button is too low and the hero image is cut off," wait for the fix, open Chrome again, find 3 new issues, describe those too ... Claude Code + computer use eliminates the entire loop: → Claude writes the full landing page or advertorial → Opens Chrome and navigates to it → Spots layout issues, broken spacing, off-brand colors, missing elements → Fixes everything and re-checks until the page looks right → Tests your Shopify product pages by clicking through like a real customer → Walks through your checkout flow and flags friction before customers hit it → You only see the finished, visually verified result No describing what you see on screen. No "the CTA button needs more contrast" back-and-forth. No being the eyeballs for an AI that can't see. What you get: → Landing pages and advertorials Claude builds AND visually QAs before you ever look at them → Product pages Claude clicks through — testing layout, images, and CTAs like a real user → HTML dashboards Claude opens and verifies the charts actually render → Checkout flows Claude walks through step by step to catch friction → All of it happening in one session — build, test, fix, done One prompt. Claude builds it, checks it, and fixes it. You just review the finished page. I put together a full playbook with the exact setup, the prompts, and 5 DTC workflows that use Claude Code + computer use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "CLAUDE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:20

Claude Code + computer use is f*cking cracked 🤯 Build a landing page → Claude opens Chrome, looks at it, spots every issue, and fixes it — without you describing a single thing. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who are still vibe-coding landing pages and advertorials in Claude Code, then manually opening them in Chrome, spotting 15 things wrong, and describing every visual issue back to Claude one at a time. If you're building pages in Claude Code and your workflow looks like this — build the page, open it in Chrome, spot broken spacing, go back to Claude, type "the CTA button is too low and the hero image is cut off," wait for the fix, open Chrome again, find 3 new issues, describe those too ... Claude Code + computer use eliminates the entire loop: → Claude writes the full landing page or advertorial → Opens Chrome and navigates to it → Spots layout issues, broken spacing, off-brand colors, missing elements → Fixes everything and re-checks until the page looks right → Tests your Shopify product pages by clicking through like a real customer → Walks through your checkout flow and flags friction before customers hit it → You only see the finished, visually verified result No describing what you see on screen. No "the CTA button needs more contrast" back-and-forth. No being the eyeballs for an AI that can't see. What you get: → Landing pages and advertorials Claude builds AND visually QAs before you ever look at them → Product pages Claude clicks through — testing layout, images, and CTAs like a real user → HTML dashboards Claude opens and verifies the charts actually render → Checkout flows Claude walks through step by step to catch friction → All of it happening in one session — build, test, fix, done One prompt. Claude builds it, checks it, and fixes it. You just review the finished page. I put together a full playbook with the exact setup, the prompts, and 5 DTC workflows that use Claude Code + computer use. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "CLAUDE" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

19,143 次观看 • 5 个月前

Building AI agents and tools is getting ridiculously easy! Here is a pretty impressive FREE and Open-Source AI agent builder that runs on your computer. It's a desktop app you can install on Mac or Windows. Link: • Free • 100% no-code: You can type what you want, and the tool will build everything for you. • You can use local models like DeepSeek or Qwen, or connect to cloud models like GPT-4o, Claude, or Gemini with your API key. • You can turn the tools you build into MCP Servers. I recorded a quick video to show you how easy it is to build something from scratch.
4:10

Building AI agents and tools is getting ridiculously easy! Here is a pretty impressive FREE and Open-Source AI agent builder that runs on your computer. It's a desktop app you can install on Mac or Windows. Link: • Free • 100% no-code: You can type what you want, and the tool will build everything for you. • You can use local models like DeepSeek or Qwen, or connect to cloud models like GPT-4o, Claude, or Gemini with your API key. • You can turn the tools you build into MCP Servers. I recorded a quick video to show you how easy it is to build something from scratch.

Santiago

56,815 次观看 • 1 年前