Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

Testing animations with Claude Opus 5.5 on a recent essay of mine. This sample came from very basic prompts that provided almost no direction.

Jack

48,906 subscribers

10,226 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

AI UGC Tip: Feed GPT/Claude 5-10 prompts that generated a good UGC video and tell it to stay trained on these exact prompts. You'll get outputs like this almost every time with some slight tweaking needed. Also, claude gives infinitely worse output.

AI UGC Tip: Feed GPT/Claude 5-10 prompts that generated a good UGC video and tell it to stay trained on these exact prompts. You'll get outputs like this almost every time with some slight tweaking needed. Also, claude gives infinitely worse output.

mtvmald

59,984 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Another example of a quick, throwaway visual tool that I vibecoded to explore an idea (this time with Claude Fable). It exports video loops, and I can play around with colour, grain, direction... Took around 5 prompts and gave me a massive head start on a brand identity direction.

charlota

12,404 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

LongCat performed Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 level on real physics tasks for $0! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics Prompts: - A cannon demolishing a brick wall - A bowling ball knocking down the pins - A tornado that sucks in random objects Outputs: LongCat: 18,015 tokens, $0.00 Opus 4.8: 18,872 tokens, $0.48 GPT 5.5: 32,588 tokens, $0.98 GLM 5.2: 31,062 tokens, $0.09 On the physics LongCat came out ahead of Opus 4.8 and GLM 5.2 - cleaner collisions, nothing clipping or falling through. On detail and rendering it matched GPT 5.5, the best looking of the four. Getting this quality for free is wild!

atomic.chat

105,523 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

Salute to the Qwen team 🫡 We tested Qwen 3.7-Max, Gemini 3.5 Flash, GPT-5.5, and Claude Opus 4.7. The biggest shock came from Qwen. In less than a month (3.6 Max dropped April 20), Qwen went from the worst multimodal output on our sakura tree test, barely keeping up with Gemini, GPT, and Claude , to matching Gemini 3.5 Flash frame for frame on this soccer test, and outperforming GPT-5.5 and Claude Opus 4.7. It rendered a perfectly proportioned soccer player and the most lifelike ball in the entire test. Remarkable spatial reasoning. Also: Gemini 3.5 Flash is now faster than GPT-5.5, which used to be the fastest in our past tests.

GMI Cloud

75,785 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Claude Fable 5 is our first generally available Mythos-class model. It ships with new safety classifiers that may flag certain prompts in dual-use domains like cyber and bio. We've added fallbacks: a refused request retries on Claude Opus 4.8 instead of dead-ending.

Claude Fable 5 is our first generally available Mythos-class model. It ships with new safety classifiers that may flag certain prompts in dual-use domains like cyber and bio. We've added fallbacks: a refused request retries on Claude Opus 4.8 instead of dead-ending.

ClaudeDevs

465,716 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Anthropic engineer Lance Martin just shared /claude-api prompt-audit, a one-line Claude Code command that audits your skills, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md and prompts and proposes fixes based on the latest Opus 5.5 guidance. → Flags verification rituals like "double-check your work" that newer models don't need → Catches ALL-CAPS NEVER rules and other pressure language that makes the model rigid → Marks rules with no stated reason, and hard word caps on output, as candidates to rewrite or remove → Gives a report with file, line and quoted evidence, plus a proposed diff you can apply Source: Lance Martin

Anthropic engineer Lance Martin just shared /claude-api prompt-audit, a one-line Claude Code command that audits your skills, CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md and prompts and proposes fixes based on the latest Opus 5.5 guidance. → Flags verification rituals like "double-check your work" that newer models don't need → Catches ALL-CAPS NEVER rules and other pressure language that makes the model rigid → Marks rules with no stated reason, and hard word caps on output, as candidates to rewrite or remove → Gives a report with file, line and quoted evidence, plus a proposed diff you can apply Source: Lance Martin

0xMarioNawfal

52,516 Aufrufe • vor 10 Stunden

THIS IS A GOLD MINE I found a website with thousands of free Skills, plugins, and agents for Claude. These are not simple prompts. Real tools for sales, marketing, content creation, programming, databases, automation, analysis, and even crypto trading. Hundreds of Claude plugins that could easily be sold for money. All of it is free. If you use Claude, this is an entire arsenal you can start using today

THIS IS A GOLD MINE I found a website with thousands of free Skills, plugins, and agents for Claude. These are not simple prompts. Real tools for sales, marketing, content creation, programming, databases, automation, analysis, and even crypto trading. Hundreds of Claude plugins that could easily be sold for money. All of it is free. If you use Claude, this is an entire arsenal you can start using today

CyrilXBT

21,461 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

BREAKING: Anthropic just dropped Opus 4.8—and it is a MONSTER We've been testing for about a week Every 📧 and our verdict is they could've just called it Opus 5, it's that good. Here's our vibe check: - Beats GPT-5.5 on Senior Engineer bench. On our toughest benchmark Opus 4.8 scores a 63—a hair higher than GPT-5.5's score of 62, and a full 30 points higher than Opus 4.7. It tackled a ground-up rewrite of a production codebase, and actually built something that works. HOWEVER: Coding performance varied a lot at different reasoning levels. We recommend using it on xhigh for best results. - Incredibly good writer. Opus 4.8 scored a 79.6 on our writing benchmark—measuring models on real-world writing tasks we do all of the time like essay writing, promo email writing, and more. It beats GPT-5.5 by 6 points. It produces well-written prose with fewer "AI-isms". It's also very good at writing in your voice given the right context. HOWEVER: Writing performance also varied with reasoning levels. Medium reasoning had higher incidence of AI-isms—we found best results with high. - Beast at knowledge work. Opus 4.8 is very good at general knowledge work tasks like report creation, research and more. It produced the best PowerPoint one-shot we've ever seen on our deck generation benchmark. - Emotionally intelligent, willing to question the frame. I've also found it to be quite good at talking through psychological or interpersonal issues. It has a high EQ, and it's also good at not glazing and helping to expand your perspective. Its thought process feels extremely rich and dynamic. THE BAD: These days a model is only as good as its harness, and Codex is still a far superior harness to the Claude Desktop app. This has kept me using Codex + GPT-5.5 as my daily driver, but I am flipping back and forth a lot more between Codex and Claude. Anthropic is back baby! Read the rest on Every 📧:

Dan Shipper

354,673 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Hey #Catchers👽 Today we have prepared for you a small sample of the direction in which our development has moved. We're still working on the animations, but our Combat #AR is almost complete🚀 We hope you will appreciate #SpaceCatch progress 🔥 #PoGoKiller #Crypto #P2EGame

Hey #Catchers👽 Today we have prepared for you a small sample of the direction in which our development has moved. We're still working on the animations, but our Combat #AR is almost complete🚀 We hope you will appreciate #SpaceCatch progress 🔥 #PoGoKiller #Crypto #P2EGame

SpaceCatch

224,603 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

New Claude Sonnet 5 performs at GPT 5.5 level 6x cheaper! We gave 4 models the same prompt: build three self-contained HTML5 canvas scenes with real physics crash demos Prompts: - A car crashes into a brick wall - A wrecking ball destroys a house - A catapult throws a rock at a castle wall Outputs: Sonnet 5: 15,047 tokens, $0.15 Opus 4.8: 23,063 tokens, $0.58 Sonnet 4.6: 25,824 tokens, $0.39 GPT 5.5: 31,152 tokens, $0.94 Sonnet 5 did as well as Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5 on all three tests. In the wrecking ball test, it beat Opus 4.8. The cable moves smoothly and every hit connects. In the catapult test, it beat GPT 5.5. The rock always lands inside the wall. Sonnet 5 still needs better detail and graphics. But it used fewer tokens than every other model

atomic.chat

729,349 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Someone just broke the paywall on Claude Design… and almost no one noticed. It’s called Open Design. No subscription. No limits. No “Pro plan required.” Just raw access. 👉 Turn prompts into real UI/UX 👉 Generate designs with Claude 👉 Replace expensive design tools 👉 Fully customizable (open source) This isn’t a tool. It’s a shortcut around the entire design economy. Most people will ignore this. A few will build insane things with it. Guess which side wins. Save this before it explodes Repo:

Someone just broke the paywall on Claude Design… and almost no one noticed. It’s called Open Design. No subscription. No limits. No “Pro plan required.” Just raw access. 👉 Turn prompts into real UI/UX 👉 Generate designs with Claude 👉 Replace expensive design tools 👉 Fully customizable (open source) This isn’t a tool. It’s a shortcut around the entire design economy. Most people will ignore this. A few will build insane things with it. Guess which side wins. Save this before it explodes Repo:

Leonard Rodman

29,227 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Wait, is Claude Opus 4.8 actually a Fable 5?? Opus generated this. A 3D botanical DNA strand. No, it's not a video or a 3D asset. It's pure math using Three.js, running at 60fps ❤️‍🔥 Everything including petals and flowers is generated using custom geometry. Also responsive. That too done from a image reference. Fable or not, Claude is generally good at 3D stuff.

Wait, is Claude Opus 4.8 actually a Fable 5?? Opus generated this. A 3D botanical DNA strand. No, it's not a video or a 3D asset. It's pure math using Three.js, running at 60fps ❤️‍🔥 Everything including petals and flowers is generated using custom geometry. Also responsive. That too done from a image reference. Fable or not, Claude is generally good at 3D stuff.

The Bugged Dev

24,145 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

$35 OF FREE CLAUDE OPUS 5 CREDITS FOR A WEEK, NO CARD ANYWHERE • the credit > Sign up with Google and the trial activates on its own, nothing to claim manually: > Opus 5 sits alongside Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6 and Haiku on the same key. > The window runs a week from activation. • wiring it up > base url: > model id: claude-opus-5 > In OpenCode Desktop hit Ctrl+, and add a custom provider with the id aerolink. > The same key drops into Codex, Cursor and Claude Code with nothing else changed. One key, not locked to one client -> every tool that takes a custom OpenAI-compatible endpoint reads it the same way. It routes through a third-party proxy rather than an official Anthropic channel, so keep client work off it ↓

$35 OF FREE CLAUDE OPUS 5 CREDITS FOR A WEEK, NO CARD ANYWHERE • the credit > Sign up with Google and the trial activates on its own, nothing to claim manually: > Opus 5 sits alongside Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6 and Haiku on the same key. > The window runs a week from activation. • wiring it up > base url: > model id: claude-opus-5 > In OpenCode Desktop hit Ctrl+, and add a custom provider with the id aerolink. > The same key drops into Codex, Cursor and Claude Code with nothing else changed. One key, not locked to one client -> every tool that takes a custom OpenAI-compatible endpoint reads it the same way. It routes through a third-party proxy rather than an official Anthropic channel, so keep client work off it ↓

slash1s

21,080 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Testing Opus 5.5 on max effort. You're a world-class motion designer, and this is your 15-second résumé reel. Make it dynamic and confident: open with a striking hook in the first second, build through a sequence of distinct techniques (typography, shape play, camera moves, colour shifts), and land on a clean, memorable final frame. Pacing should feel like it's cut to music. Go crazy.

Testing Opus 5.5 on max effort. You're a world-class motion designer, and this is your 15-second résumé reel. Make it dynamic and confident: open with a striking hook in the first second, build through a sequence of distinct techniques (typography, shape play, camera moves, colour shifts), and land on a clean, memorable final frame. Pacing should feel like it's cut to music. Go crazy.

Daryl Patigas

65,612 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

After a weekend of testing and working on something with GPT-5.3-Codex & Opus 4.6, ChatGPT Pro + Claude Max 5x are still the best combo in my opinion Using Codex & Claude Code CLI running in tmux (the desktop apps are still a bit buggy) and they're accessible even on the go from iPhone with Termius (and VPN) Usually starting with GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh and Opus 4.6 in plan mode, discussing changes and options, and each writing their plans down to separate Markdown files Then letting GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh (or Opus 4.6) implement the changes as the first draft, then Opus 4.6 reviews them with a team of agents (works pretty well already with tmux even though still experimental) based on both prepared plans, fixes stuff, and then another review by GPT-5.3-Codex xhigh or vice versa Interesting that even Opus 4.6 still occasionally makes silly mistakes like wrong imports, partial or overly broad renaming of variables/functions, etc Fun fact, OpenAI apparently plans to use their Super Bowl ad to promote Codex - curious what that will look like

Tibor Blaho

29,794 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

✨ New samwho visual essay o'clock! ✨ Reservoir sampling is one of my favourite algorithms. It allows you to sample from a set without knowing the size of that set. I assume no prior knowledge, and use no math notation. Just beautiful visuals. Let me know what you think! ❤️

✨ New samwho visual essay o'clock! ✨ Reservoir sampling is one of my favourite algorithms. It allows you to sample from a set without knowing the size of that set. I assume no prior knowledge, and use no math notation. Just beautiful visuals. Let me know what you think! ❤️

Sam Rose

24,073 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

#Patanjali ghee Ghee sample collected : 2020 Sample failed : 2022 Judgement came : 2025 Fine imposed : Rs 1 lac Was the ghee withdrawn from market - no Will Lashkar-e- Noida channels who make a living on his ads show this news - no Hindus are in khatra from such babas & lalas

#Patanjali ghee Ghee sample collected : 2020 Sample failed : 2022 Judgement came : 2025 Fine imposed : Rs 1 lac Was the ghee withdrawn from market - no Will Lashkar-e- Noida channels who make a living on his ads show this news - no Hindus are in khatra from such babas & lalas

ηᎥ†Ꭵղ

126,668 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

TRUMP ON HIS 40 MINUTE PLUS CONVERSATION WITH MODI. "I had a very good talk with him and he's a friend of mine from India and he's doing great. We had a very good conversation."

TRUMP ON HIS 40 MINUTE PLUS CONVERSATION WITH MODI. "I had a very good talk with him and he's a friend of mine from India and he's doing great. We had a very good conversation."

Rahul Shivshankar

12,071 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten