正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Testing some more Kling Elements. Kling AI These are just my second tries, but I can see huge potential here. Some elements are super accurate, while others are a bit off, but it depends on the subject or object you're using. Four Elements might be too much, but sometimes,... show more

Allar Haltsonen

13,882 subscribers

54,736 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 条评论

Cam Murdoch 🏝️ 的头像

Cam Murdoch 🏝️1 年前

@Kling_ai Why a black man eating chicken though?

Croudemar 的头像

Croudemar1 年前

I love these Minecraft Lego sets, especially the figures and the little enderman! Click an image below or see them all at:

Tabi Yume 的头像

Tabi Yume1 年前

@Kling_ai What pika droped is sick video inpainting👍

Allar Haltsonen 的头像

Allar Haltsonen1 年前

@Kling_ai Pika is also great ✌🏼

SaintsRJ 的头像

SaintsRJ1 年前

@Kling_ai Went nice! Pretty cool! Congrats!

Allar Haltsonen 的头像

Allar Haltsonen1 年前

@Kling_ai Thanks SaintsRJ!

Halim Alrasihi 的头像

Halim Alrasihi1 年前

@Kling_ai Delicious 😮‍💨

Allar Haltsonen 的头像

Allar Haltsonen1 年前

@Kling_ai My brother!!

This Frame Doesn't Exist 的头像

This Frame Doesn't Exist1 年前

@Kling_ai It's super powerful! How much do you think these 'cinematic, 4k and ultra realistic' could help get better results? (Just curious)

Allar Haltsonen 的头像

Allar Haltsonen1 年前

@Kling_ai I don’t know the be honest. Just testing out different prompts and sometimes it looks like it’s better.

Alex Patrascu 的头像

Alex Patrascu1 年前

@Kling_ai 🔥🔥🔥

Allar Haltsonen 的头像

Allar Haltsonen1 年前

@Kling_ai Thank you so much bro

相关视频

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

Seedance 2.0 VS Kling 3.0! 🔥 Essential comparison to understand the two best models on the market Conclusions and prompt: The generations are radically different, using the same initial and final frames and spaceship elements. I specified that it's a fast-paced, cinematic action scene. But Seedance has created a beautiful, relaxing, high-quality scene. The rendering of the ship's movements is sublime with Seedance; it's a dynamic, cinematic-quality 3D element. The Kling scene conveys the message better; I specified that it should splash in the water. The sounds are good; in Seedance, the sound quality is cinematic. I've added a third shot with Kling and a giant. I used Kling 3.0 at Higgsfield Prompt in comment:

hedoήist

43,612 次观看 • 4 个月前

Video Inpainting has now made it's way onto Kling. It's called Multi-Elements. You can now Swap, Add and Delete elements from a video to completely change the narrative. Here are some examples. I've always been a big fan of this technology and it's nice to see more companies exploring it as well. Kling AI Video inpainting results are done by making simple selections in a video with a text description to get an end result and it works very well!

Video Inpainting has now made it's way onto Kling. It's called Multi-Elements. You can now Swap, Add and Delete elements from a video to completely change the narrative. Here are some examples. I've always been a big fan of this technology and it's nice to see more companies exploring it as well. Kling AI Video inpainting results are done by making simple selections in a video with a text description to get an end result and it works very well!

Travis Davids

29,660 次观看 • 1 年前

Here is a fun idea to try. You can create these images with giant people/animals using Nano Banana Pro. Just adjust the elements in brackets and have fun! If you have the option to generate at 4K, definitely use it as it makes the tiny people look crisper. These types of images seem to animate best with Veo 3.1 from testing, but you can try with Kling 2.6 or Grok Imagine as well so have some fun! Feel free to show me your giant humans/animals. 🍌Universal Prompt: A highly detailed, photorealistic [CAMERA ANGLE, e.g., wide-angle shot, aerial shot looking down, extreme low-angle looking up] showing a colossal [DESCRIBE THE PERSON & CLOTHING] positioned in [SPECIFIC LOCATION/CITY/LANDSCAPE]. The giant is [ACTION - INTERACTING WITH THE ENVIRONMENT, e.g., sitting on a building, stepping over a bridge]. To establish the immense scale, tiny [TINY ELEMENTS: PEOPLE, CARS, OR BOATS] are visible near their [FEET/HANDS]. The lighting is [TIME OF DAY, e.g., golden hour, midday sun]. There are more visuals examples with prompts included in my 80 creative use cases document which you can view via this link completely for free. Look for use case 84.

Here is a fun idea to try. You can create these images with giant people/animals using Nano Banana Pro. Just adjust the elements in brackets and have fun! If you have the option to generate at 4K, definitely use it as it makes the tiny people look crisper. These types of images seem to animate best with Veo 3.1 from testing, but you can try with Kling 2.6 or Grok Imagine as well so have some fun! Feel free to show me your giant humans/animals. 🍌Universal Prompt: A highly detailed, photorealistic [CAMERA ANGLE, e.g., wide-angle shot, aerial shot looking down, extreme low-angle looking up] showing a colossal [DESCRIBE THE PERSON & CLOTHING] positioned in [SPECIFIC LOCATION/CITY/LANDSCAPE]. The giant is [ACTION - INTERACTING WITH THE ENVIRONMENT, e.g., sitting on a building, stepping over a bridge]. To establish the immense scale, tiny [TINY ELEMENTS: PEOPLE, CARS, OR BOATS] are visible near their [FEET/HANDS]. The lighting is [TIME OF DAY, e.g., golden hour, midday sun]. There are more visuals examples with prompts included in my 80 creative use cases document which you can view via this link completely for free. Look for use case 84.

Travis Davids

462,621 次观看 • 7 个月前

Okay, this one is the Grok Imagine version. But here’s something you need to note: I uploaded the character sheet I made with Nano Banana Pro as the base image. So it feels like this fake “Omni reference” kind of style, but it works 😄 Somehow, it’s much more consistent than uploading a still image of your scene with your character, because there’s a chance your character will morph a bit. By using your character sheet as the base model, it helps maintain consistency. The only problem is that when you do the img2vid prompt, you need to retell the setting, the action, the vibe and so on. But for me, I kind of like that approach, LOL 😆 Like I said, I’m getting lazy about animating images one by one. With this approach, I can just focus on dividing the shots, like shot 1: blabla, shot 2: bliblibli, shot 3: blublu, etc. Now for the comparison: In comparison with the Kling 3.0 Omni version, I feel that Grok Imagine is much more dynamic. But in terms of the character performance, it feels a bit over the top. It’s like the AI characters are acting it out 😁 Meanwhile, Kling 3.0 Omni feels much more realistic in terms of the acting and a bit more atmospheric. I honestly love both. If I want to fool around, I guess I’ll use Grok Imagine. But if I want more subtle realism and a candid feel, I’ll go with Kling 3.0.

Okay, this one is the Grok Imagine version. But here’s something you need to note: I uploaded the character sheet I made with Nano Banana Pro as the base image. So it feels like this fake “Omni reference” kind of style, but it works 😄 Somehow, it’s much more consistent than uploading a still image of your scene with your character, because there’s a chance your character will morph a bit. By using your character sheet as the base model, it helps maintain consistency. The only problem is that when you do the img2vid prompt, you need to retell the setting, the action, the vibe and so on. But for me, I kind of like that approach, LOL 😆 Like I said, I’m getting lazy about animating images one by one. With this approach, I can just focus on dividing the shots, like shot 1: blabla, shot 2: bliblibli, shot 3: blublu, etc. Now for the comparison: In comparison with the Kling 3.0 Omni version, I feel that Grok Imagine is much more dynamic. But in terms of the character performance, it feels a bit over the top. It’s like the AI characters are acting it out 😁 Meanwhile, Kling 3.0 Omni feels much more realistic in terms of the acting and a bit more atmospheric. I honestly love both. If I want to fool around, I guess I’ll use Grok Imagine. But if I want more subtle realism and a candid feel, I’ll go with Kling 3.0.

DAN · MXVDXN

16,764 次观看 • 4 个月前

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Finally got our hands on Seedance 2.0 (through YouArt) and ran it head-to-head with Kling AI 3.0. Here’s what stood out: Seedance 2.0’s physics feel stronger right away. The movement just looks more natural and realistic, especially in bigger physical actions. It also handles continuity across multiple shots from a single prompt better than I expected, which makes scene building a lot easier. And on the audio side, the lip sync generally holds up better than Kling. But here’s the tradeoff: Both models struggle with fine details. Background faces and smaller elements still get a bit messy. Seedance currently outputs at 720p, while Kling 3.0 supports 1080p, so Kling has the edge in overall sharpness. Even with upscaling, Seedance doesn’t fully recover those tiny details. Verdict🏆: Seedance 2.0 is a real step forward, especially for motion realism, but it’s definitely not the “end of Hollywood.” Check out our latest tutorial where we show you how to get access to this new model and take a deep look at the quality of this new AI Video Generator:

Curious Refuge

58,989 次观看 • 4 个月前

Designed this site in Fable 5 with just a few prompts. And no, this is not a lame post where I attach my actual (not AI) work on an AI post to get views by making fun of a launch. This is actually Fable 5, as you can clearly see (with some of the elements that scream AI generated). But man is it doing a great job!

Designed this site in Fable 5 with just a few prompts. And no, this is not a lame post where I attach my actual (not AI) work on an AI post to get views by making fun of a launch. This is actually Fable 5, as you can clearly see (with some of the elements that scream AI generated). But man is it doing a great job!

Asaad Mahmood - The Small Square

106,914 次观看 • 1 个月前

RUN RABBIT RUN 🐇 – VEO3 CHEAT SHEET – Part I ( 🔈Sound on) So, I’ve been more extensively testing Veo3 over the past few weeks, and I wanted to see how much dynamism I could get from the new model and how I could use motion and placement to consistently tell a story while changing universes each time. Now, my findings: 1/ First, it does feel more like a Veo2.5 than a full leap. But it’s a meaningful step forward, especially in motion and complexity. Maybe I'm a little jaded, but I expect new versions of models to be strong departures from the previous one. Veo2 was already great, this one feels like an evolution, not a revolution. 2/ My Veo2 Cheat Sheet still mostly apply for Veo3: For example, I still prompt the most important elements first (often style). Just as a reminder: 3/ It's pretty good at filling the gaps when you're writing simple prompts. For cool, out-of-the-box results, just describe short scenes, but be careful with consistency. Weird tradeoff, I guess. 4/ The token window is a LOT longer, so you can get more complex, multi-step actions from your prompt. Veo2 would often lose the thread, Veo3 can keep up with sequential and layered instructions. That’s a win. 5/ Camera motion is much better. Handheld, tracking, wide-angle moves, it holds together well. Still lacks control, but it’s a clear jump from Veo2. Definitely worth noting, especially given how many people have been experimenting with Higgsfield lately. 6/ Like Veo2, POV and fantasy prompts seem to lean into a game engine vibe. Not quite realism — more like stylized cutscenes or in-game shots. Sometimes it works, sometimes it’s distracting. 7/ Aspect ratio tip (thanks Kyle Salazar): want to reduce the black bars? Add “aspect ratio 1.85:1” at the start of your prompt. Haven’t tested it yet, but apparently it helps. -8/ You can generate 360° videos. Try “360 video,” “monoscopic,” or “equirectangular.” Not flawless (some seams), but it works surprisingly well. See my previous post for this. 9/ Prompting for aesthetics is still hit-or-miss. Consistency is tough. You can over-describe your characters and key elements to keep them stable throughout, but for style...especially animation, it’s still hard to maintain. Hopefully "ingredients" or style-locking features will help in the near future. 10/ Bodies and turning movements are still tricky. Fast actions still distort limbs, creates artifacts, etc... Most shot are fine, but if you push too much for extremely dynamic scenes, you'll definitely notice some distortions (some in this video too) - What’s still missing (but probably coming): – Image-to-video – Start/end frame control – Locking a voice to a character – Prompt ingredients or persistent visual logic This is just Part I :) I’ll keep posting notes as I go.

RUN RABBIT RUN 🐇 – VEO3 CHEAT SHEET – Part I ( 🔈Sound on) So, I’ve been more extensively testing Veo3 over the past few weeks, and I wanted to see how much dynamism I could get from the new model and how I could use motion and placement to consistently tell a story while changing universes each time. Now, my findings: 1/ First, it does feel more like a Veo2.5 than a full leap. But it’s a meaningful step forward, especially in motion and complexity. Maybe I'm a little jaded, but I expect new versions of models to be strong departures from the previous one. Veo2 was already great, this one feels like an evolution, not a revolution. 2/ My Veo2 Cheat Sheet still mostly apply for Veo3: For example, I still prompt the most important elements first (often style). Just as a reminder: 3/ It's pretty good at filling the gaps when you're writing simple prompts. For cool, out-of-the-box results, just describe short scenes, but be careful with consistency. Weird tradeoff, I guess. 4/ The token window is a LOT longer, so you can get more complex, multi-step actions from your prompt. Veo2 would often lose the thread, Veo3 can keep up with sequential and layered instructions. That’s a win. 5/ Camera motion is much better. Handheld, tracking, wide-angle moves, it holds together well. Still lacks control, but it’s a clear jump from Veo2. Definitely worth noting, especially given how many people have been experimenting with Higgsfield lately. 6/ Like Veo2, POV and fantasy prompts seem to lean into a game engine vibe. Not quite realism — more like stylized cutscenes or in-game shots. Sometimes it works, sometimes it’s distracting. 7/ Aspect ratio tip (thanks Kyle Salazar): want to reduce the black bars? Add “aspect ratio 1.85:1” at the start of your prompt. Haven’t tested it yet, but apparently it helps. -8/ You can generate 360° videos. Try “360 video,” “monoscopic,” or “equirectangular.” Not flawless (some seams), but it works surprisingly well. See my previous post for this. 9/ Prompting for aesthetics is still hit-or-miss. Consistency is tough. You can over-describe your characters and key elements to keep them stable throughout, but for style...especially animation, it’s still hard to maintain. Hopefully "ingredients" or style-locking features will help in the near future. 10/ Bodies and turning movements are still tricky. Fast actions still distort limbs, creates artifacts, etc... Most shot are fine, but if you push too much for extremely dynamic scenes, you'll definitely notice some distortions (some in this video too) - What’s still missing (but probably coming): – Image-to-video – Start/end frame control – Locking a voice to a character – Prompt ingredients or persistent visual logic This is just Part I :) I’ll keep posting notes as I go.

Henry Daubrez 🌸💀

14,683 次观看 • 1 年前

I screened this latest AI short in Paris for the Prompt Club alongside a great showcase for French AI filmmaking talent. I think we have reached a tipping point where the quality of the models is no longer an obstacle to telling the story. Sure, there are problems with detail at distance, dynamic movement, and more than one character speaking or doing complex movement at the same time but nothing a director with awareness of the models can’t overcome. Kling motion control is a massive unlock, in this short I am playing all the characters so it’s quite broad because I am not an actor, but I have seen it used with professional actors and it captures real nuanced human performance, with everything that brings. I will be employing professional actors for my films in the future. This was made predominantly with Kling 2.5, and 2.6 motion with some seedance shots on the wider 2-shots. We are there, now go make your thing!

I screened this latest AI short in Paris for the Prompt Club alongside a great showcase for French AI filmmaking talent. I think we have reached a tipping point where the quality of the models is no longer an obstacle to telling the story. Sure, there are problems with detail at distance, dynamic movement, and more than one character speaking or doing complex movement at the same time but nothing a director with awareness of the models can’t overcome. Kling motion control is a massive unlock, in this short I am playing all the characters so it’s quite broad because I am not an actor, but I have seen it used with professional actors and it captures real nuanced human performance, with everything that brings. I will be employing professional actors for my films in the future. This was made predominantly with Kling 2.5, and 2.6 motion with some seedance shots on the wider 2-shots. We are there, now go make your thing!

Uncanny Harry AI

10,201 次观看 • 5 个月前

My upcoming release of "Cinematic AI" has made me think about how bodies of work are formed. I think some are manifested and some are revealed. I think "Cinematic AI" falls into the latter category. It was not something I had a clear vision for and then created, but it was something that was revealed to me over time. I thought I saw a glimmer of it early on, but only after some time had past, could I see the body of work emerge. With a bit more context and watching great artists and how they work and think, it finally came to me that this series of 15-20 pieces that I had created could be a worthy collection to mint. AI art has been going through so many transformations from the early GAN work to Collaborative AI to now AI being widely accessible through platforms like MidJourney, Stable Diffusion, and many others. But one area that I have seen explode in recent months is cinematic AI. I distinguish this from animated AI, which has been around for a while, but cinematic AI is where the movements created by AI are getting closer to what you'd see in a movie or captured on a video camera. It still has a long way to go but it is getting more real than surreal as the technology develops. And this is where I seem to have found my groove, my home, my little corner in the artistic landscape. After Runway launched their image-to-video tool, it just blew my mind and I went down a deep rabbit hole and have created a new cinematic AI piece almost every other day for the past few months. I initially saw many of these pieces as just experiments, but with some time to reflect, I am seeing them as having the potential of being relevant pieces of artwork to mark this time in the development of AI. In some cases, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to create a similar piece again, since the tools I use are not in my control, but in the control of the AI platforms, who are constantly improving and evolving the tools. Given all of this, there is no better way to mark my place in time than on the blockchain. I truly believe that this body of work has the potential to be an important artifact of this era in AI and AI art. It is always hard to judge ones own work, but what I can do is permanently etch in time on an immutable public database saying that I created this. Only time will tell if the work has any value or is of any significance, but who created it and what was created cannot be disputed. I hope this gives you and especially collectors some perspective on the work I'll be releasing next week. I'm still very early in my artistic journey, but hopefully some of you will see promise in what I'm doing and maybe even put in a early bet on my art practice by bidding on a piece next week. Thanks to all of you who have supported me, taught me, advised me, been a friend to me. Much love and respect.🙏 ------------------------------------- CINEMATIC AI October 25, 2023 Marking on the blockchain, establishing historical provenance for a cinematic AI body of work. Minting on Transient Labs ERC-721TL Listing on SuperRare

My upcoming release of "Cinematic AI" has made me think about how bodies of work are formed. I think some are manifested and some are revealed. I think "Cinematic AI" falls into the latter category. It was not something I had a clear vision for and then created, but it was something that was revealed to me over time. I thought I saw a glimmer of it early on, but only after some time had past, could I see the body of work emerge. With a bit more context and watching great artists and how they work and think, it finally came to me that this series of 15-20 pieces that I had created could be a worthy collection to mint. AI art has been going through so many transformations from the early GAN work to Collaborative AI to now AI being widely accessible through platforms like MidJourney, Stable Diffusion, and many others. But one area that I have seen explode in recent months is cinematic AI. I distinguish this from animated AI, which has been around for a while, but cinematic AI is where the movements created by AI are getting closer to what you'd see in a movie or captured on a video camera. It still has a long way to go but it is getting more real than surreal as the technology develops. And this is where I seem to have found my groove, my home, my little corner in the artistic landscape. After Runway launched their image-to-video tool, it just blew my mind and I went down a deep rabbit hole and have created a new cinematic AI piece almost every other day for the past few months. I initially saw many of these pieces as just experiments, but with some time to reflect, I am seeing them as having the potential of being relevant pieces of artwork to mark this time in the development of AI. In some cases, I'm not sure if I'll ever be able to create a similar piece again, since the tools I use are not in my control, but in the control of the AI platforms, who are constantly improving and evolving the tools. Given all of this, there is no better way to mark my place in time than on the blockchain. I truly believe that this body of work has the potential to be an important artifact of this era in AI and AI art. It is always hard to judge ones own work, but what I can do is permanently etch in time on an immutable public database saying that I created this. Only time will tell if the work has any value or is of any significance, but who created it and what was created cannot be disputed. I hope this gives you and especially collectors some perspective on the work I'll be releasing next week. I'm still very early in my artistic journey, but hopefully some of you will see promise in what I'm doing and maybe even put in a early bet on my art practice by bidding on a piece next week. Thanks to all of you who have supported me, taught me, advised me, been a friend to me. Much love and respect.🙏 ------------------------------------- CINEMATIC AI October 25, 2023 Marking on the blockchain, establishing historical provenance for a cinematic AI body of work. Minting on Transient Labs ERC-721TL Listing on SuperRare

Chikai

21,488 次观看 • 2 年前

We're giving away the prompt we used to make this AI UGC video. Getting Sora 2 to output hyper-realistic, consistent footage isn't just about the tool. The prompt has to be structured in a very specific way... character description, cinematography, camera motion, lighting, dialogue, audio, authenticity keywords. Get it wrong and the footage looks off. Get it right and everything downstream becomes easier. We’re sharing the exact Claude template we use as step one of our AI UGC workflow. It takes a basic brief (who the subject is, where they are, what they're saying, what device it should look like, their accent) and structures all of that into the exact format Sora 2 needs automatically. It sits at the start of a full workflow that runs through Sora 2 for the hook, ElevenLabs for voice cloning, ChatGPT for subject consistency, Nano Banana for B-roll generation and Kling for animation. The whole thing is broken down in the latest D2C Diaries episode. But this prompt is the foundation. Without it, the rest of the workflow is harder than it needs to be. If you're building in this space or testing AI UGC for your brand, this is worth having. Retweet this post and comment PROMPT and I’ll send it over.

Joe Marston | Ecom Growth

17,457 次观看 • 4 个月前

So Runway Gen 4.5 finally adds image-to-video, the workflow most pros rely on for consistency. We put it head to head with Kling AI and Flow by Google VEO using the same reference images and prompts (below) to evaluate motion quality, stability, and cinematic realism. 1. Action/WaterPhysics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a man running in a shallow river. The camera is tracking the man from behind as he runs up the river. Handheld camera shake as the camera follows the man. 2. Fire Physics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of terrified woman running towards her burning barn. She abruptly stops, and puts in hands on her head as she watches her barn burn down. 3. VFX test prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a hooded figure. Flashes of purple magic and smoke whirl around the figure. The figure lifts its arms as the purple magic and smoke intensifies. 4. 2D Animation Test Prompt: 2D animated shot of a waiting at a bus stop in a thunderstorm. The man turns, walks to the bench, and sits down. 5. 3D Animation Test Prompt: 3D animated shot of an octopus. The octopus reaches into a coral and picks up a glowing white gem. 6. Conversation Test Prompt: slow camera push-in as two friends are having a conversation at a coffee shop Overall verdict: Despite the “world’s best” claim, Runway Gen 4.5 is not there yet. Prompt adherence is solid, but motion, physics, and cinematic realism still lag behind tools like Kling and VEO. Great platform, mid-tier model for now.

So Runway Gen 4.5 finally adds image-to-video, the workflow most pros rely on for consistency. We put it head to head with Kling AI and Flow by Google VEO using the same reference images and prompts (below) to evaluate motion quality, stability, and cinematic realism. 1. Action/WaterPhysics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a man running in a shallow river. The camera is tracking the man from behind as he runs up the river. Handheld camera shake as the camera follows the man. 2. Fire Physics Test Prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of terrified woman running towards her burning barn. She abruptly stops, and puts in hands on her head as she watches her barn burn down. 3. VFX test prompt: Cinematic, wide-shot of a hooded figure. Flashes of purple magic and smoke whirl around the figure. The figure lifts its arms as the purple magic and smoke intensifies. 4. 2D Animation Test Prompt: 2D animated shot of a waiting at a bus stop in a thunderstorm. The man turns, walks to the bench, and sits down. 5. 3D Animation Test Prompt: 3D animated shot of an octopus. The octopus reaches into a coral and picks up a glowing white gem. 6. Conversation Test Prompt: slow camera push-in as two friends are having a conversation at a coffee shop Overall verdict: Despite the “world’s best” claim, Runway Gen 4.5 is not there yet. Prompt adherence is solid, but motion, physics, and cinematic realism still lag behind tools like Kling and VEO. Great platform, mid-tier model for now.

Curious Refuge

25,538 次观看 • 5 个月前

$GOOGL CEO Sundar Pichai on the AI Bubble: "There is some irrationality in the current AI boom. The growth of AI investment has been an extraordinary moment. Asked what happens if the AI bubble pops, he said "I think NO company is going to be immune, including us." We can look back at the internet. There was clearly a lot of excess investment, but none of us would question whether the internet was profound. I expect AI to be the same. It is both rational and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this. AI is the most profound technology humankind has worked on. It will evolve and transition certain jobs, and people will need to adapt... the people who will do well are people who learn how to use these tools." Source: BBC

$GOOGL CEO Sundar Pichai on the AI Bubble: "There is some irrationality in the current AI boom. The growth of AI investment has been an extraordinary moment. Asked what happens if the AI bubble pops, he said "I think NO company is going to be immune, including us." We can look back at the internet. There was clearly a lot of excess investment, but none of us would question whether the internet was profound. I expect AI to be the same. It is both rational and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this. AI is the most profound technology humankind has worked on. It will evolve and transition certain jobs, and people will need to adapt... the people who will do well are people who learn how to use these tools." Source: BBC

Wall St Engine

406,054 次观看 • 8 个月前

Driving in Samson is stiff. These specific missions where you're tasked to destroy other cars are a pain in the butt to finish due to the input delay while driving. Driving straight forward is no issue, but as soon as there's a turn that you need to take or come to a stop. It feels like the car takes multiple seconds to respond, whenever that is by design or not, I don't like it. At first I suspected that this could be caused by frame-gen but I had it turned off from the beginning. There's also this damage boost mode while you're driving (reminds me of Franklin's driving focus in GTA V), you deal extra damage with a car but it didn't seem like it worked properly at all and also made the car even more difficult to control.

Driving in Samson is stiff. These specific missions where you're tasked to destroy other cars are a pain in the butt to finish due to the input delay while driving. Driving straight forward is no issue, but as soon as there's a turn that you need to take or come to a stop. It feels like the car takes multiple seconds to respond, whenever that is by design or not, I don't like it. At first I suspected that this could be caused by frame-gen but I had it turned off from the beginning. There's also this damage boost mode while you're driving (reminds me of Franklin's driving focus in GTA V), you deal extra damage with a car but it didn't seem like it worked properly at all and also made the car even more difficult to control.

NikTek

79,676 次观看 • 3 个月前

For me, this was the moment when Halo went from being a War Story with futuristic elements to a Sci-fi Superhero Story. It’s an impossible shot. The camera flies around and through objects, time speeds up and slows down at random, the camera anticipates events that are scripted instead of reacting to capture them, there is no sense of space or proximity or cause and effect... It's like they gave the camera to Superman. That's all fine in a Superhero Story, but it breaks the stakes of a War Story. If the audience perspective is not grounded, then the stakes of the story are not grounded. It's exciting and flashy, but has as much impact as a kid playing with dolls.

For me, this was the moment when Halo went from being a War Story with futuristic elements to a Sci-fi Superhero Story. It’s an impossible shot. The camera flies around and through objects, time speeds up and slows down at random, the camera anticipates events that are scripted instead of reacting to capture them, there is no sense of space or proximity or cause and effect... It's like they gave the camera to Superman. That's all fine in a Superhero Story, but it breaks the stakes of a War Story. If the audience perspective is not grounded, then the stakes of the story are not grounded. It's exciting and flashy, but has as much impact as a kid playing with dolls.

Aozolai

317,793 次观看 • 8 个月前

“It can be a disappointing end to the day, but can you take some consolation in thinking you were the quicker Mercedes car today?” Kimi: “I think we were quickest on track today. Okay Lewis at the end, he was very quick, but second stint we were super quick. […] And by the way, I'm very happy for him, for his win. It's good to see that he got his first win with Ferrari. But on my side, yeah, very disappointing. I feel a bit empty, to be fair, right now. But at the same time, these things happen. Happens to everyone and the most important is to come back stronger.”

“It can be a disappointing end to the day, but can you take some consolation in thinking you were the quicker Mercedes car today?” Kimi: “I think we were quickest on track today. Okay Lewis at the end, he was very quick, but second stint we were super quick. […] And by the way, I'm very happy for him, for his win. It's good to see that he got his first win with Ferrari. But on my side, yeah, very disappointing. I feel a bit empty, to be fair, right now. But at the same time, these things happen. Happens to everyone and the most important is to come back stronger.”

did kimi score points in f1 today?

374,171 次观看 • 1 个月前

kangmin instagram live 🩵 👤 hiphop puppycat was, well, a cute guy. i liked sanghyeonie so much. he would always be like, “hyung, do you want some snacks?” if i ask him, “sanghyeon-ah, can i have some of these almonds?” he'll say, “oh yes, please have some!” “what are these? where did you buy these?” “my mom and i made it! have some, hyung~” so i ended up eating about three times, and he was like, “hyung, why are you eating so much of these?” 👤 “ah, i'm sorry! i won't eat anymore!” but then i'll check it out the next day anyway. by then, the dorm arrangements had changed, and sanghyeon had originally been staying with leo hyung but he left [the snacks] in the room, so i'd been asking about it and eating it like three times, but he wouldn't take it with him. so i was like, “yah, sanghyeon-ah, why aren't you taking these?” and he just went, “oh, hyung, just go ahead and finish it!”

kangmin instagram live 🩵 👤 hiphop puppycat was, well, a cute guy. i liked sanghyeonie so much. he would always be like, “hyung, do you want some snacks?” if i ask him, “sanghyeon-ah, can i have some of these almonds?” he'll say, “oh yes, please have some!” “what are these? where did you buy these?” “my mom and i made it! have some, hyung~” so i ended up eating about three times, and he was like, “hyung, why are you eating so much of these?” 👤 “ah, i'm sorry! i won't eat anymore!” but then i'll check it out the next day anyway. by then, the dorm arrangements had changed, and sanghyeon had originally been staying with leo hyung but he left [the snacks] in the room, so i'd been asking about it and eating it like three times, but he wouldn't take it with him. so i was like, “yah, sanghyeon-ah, why aren't you taking these?” and he just went, “oh, hyung, just go ahead and finish it!”

🍭

50,701 次观看 • 9 个月前

A convoy of Mexican Army soldiers secures a rural road after a tense operation. In the middle of the scene sits an armored pickup truck, reinforced doors, steel plating, clearly modified for cartel activity. Cameras roll as soldiers methodically disable and destroy the vehicle, sending a clear message that it won’t be used again. Scenes like this are powerful but complicated. On one hand, it shows action and enforcement. On the other, it reminds us how deep and entrenched these conflicts are. Real change probably takes more than destroying vehicles, it takes dismantling the systems behind them. Does destroying equipment like this truly weaken organized crime, or is it just one visible moment in a much bigger fight?

A convoy of Mexican Army soldiers secures a rural road after a tense operation. In the middle of the scene sits an armored pickup truck, reinforced doors, steel plating, clearly modified for cartel activity. Cameras roll as soldiers methodically disable and destroy the vehicle, sending a clear message that it won’t be used again. Scenes like this are powerful but complicated. On one hand, it shows action and enforcement. On the other, it reminds us how deep and entrenched these conflicts are. Real change probably takes more than destroying vehicles, it takes dismantling the systems behind them. Does destroying equipment like this truly weaken organized crime, or is it just one visible moment in a much bigger fight?

Dr. CZ

406,270 次观看 • 5 个月前