Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

‼️ Testing The .30 06. Theory We Know: • Inconclusive ballistics on the bullet fragment. • The full autopsy still hidden after 10 months. (Signs Tha The Prosecution Doesn't Have Much)

Coyote of Wallstreet

51,586 subscribers

32,194 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

You should look at exactly what Candace Owens doesn't want you to see. The ATF report confirms the .30 caliber class bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson owned. This is extremely significant because it undercuts this narrative that a .30-06 round couldn't possibly have killed Charlie Kirk. The “inconclusive” part of the ATF report means the bullet jacket fragment from Charlie's body was too damaged to match or exclude when compared to ballistics markings on a bullet test fired by law enforcement from Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This doesn’t mean the bullet wasn’t fired from that rifle. It means there wasn’t enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or exclude it with a bullet test fired from Tyler Robinson's rifle. This happens in 20-66% of cases when there's a bullet jacket fragment recovered from an autopsy. But the .30 caliber class round is consistent with the type of .30-06 rifle Tyler Robinson used. Candace claims the ATF did not hand over any of this analysis or data to the defense—this is false. We know the defense cited this ATF report in their January 9, 2026 filing.

Liz Wheeler

46,467 views • 3 months ago

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.

The Daily Mail headline claiming “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson” is FAKE NEWS. That's not what the court filings said at all. Court filings indicating the ATF ballistic comparison was “inconclusive.” Which means there wasn't enough ballistics data on the bullet jacket fragment to determine whether it matched or didn't match Tyler Robinson’s rifle. This is a totally common result for a ballistics analysis, inconclusive results happen in these cases between 20-66% of the time, and it means NOTHING. But—the ATF report did contain a very interesting piece of information. The court filings reveal the existence of the bullet jacket fragment itself. Not an in-tact bullet. A fragment. Which means the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk fragmented. Which explains the lack of an exit wound.

Liz Wheeler

16,328 views • 4 months ago

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

Liz Wheeler

19,316 views • 4 months ago

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION BOMBSHELL REPORT!!!🚨 Ballistics Prove Kirk WAS NOT Shot With A .30-06! If An Autopsy Was Not Performed Or Is Not Released, And The Bullet That They Claim To Have In Evidence Is Not Produced To The Public, Then We Know That The Official Story Concerning Charlie Kirk's Assassination Is A Lie! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia Joins Alex Jones To Break Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation!

🚨CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION BOMBSHELL REPORT!!!🚨 Ballistics Prove Kirk WAS NOT Shot With A .30-06! If An Autopsy Was Not Performed Or Is Not Released, And The Bullet That They Claim To Have In Evidence Is Not Produced To The Public, Then We Know That The Official Story Concerning Charlie Kirk's Assassination Is A Lie! Ballistics Expert & Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia Joins Alex Jones To Break Critical Developments In The Charlie Kirk Assassination Investigation!

Alex Jones

522,376 views • 10 months ago

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

CONFIRMED: Charlie Kirk's NECK DID STOP the bullet and was shot from the front, BUT it was NOT from a .30-06 round. It was a SMALLER ROUND. This just FLIPPED the ENTIRE case on it's head because we now know that the gun the FBI showed us is NOT the gun that shot the bullet that killed Charlie. - The front wound is a CONFIRMED "ENTRANCE WOUND," but not caused by a .30=06 caliber bullet. - Charlie's neck/bones did stop the bullet because a fragment was found beneath the skin where they said they did. - An AUTOPSY always shows the gun and caliber in the report if it is confirmed by the doctor, but NO GUN or CALIBER detail were listed at ALL on Charlie's autopsy because it was NOT a .30-06 caliber bullet. - This is why Charlie's neck/bones DID stop the bullet because it was a SMALLER ROUND from a DIFFERENT GUN. Everything you are hearing is what MANY of US have TOLD you from the very beginning. cc: Candace Owens

The SCIF

590,339 views • 10 months ago

Baron Coleman explains why "the .30-06 bullet theory makes ZERO sense..." Baron Coleman

Baron Coleman explains why "the .30-06 bullet theory makes ZERO sense..." Baron Coleman

Julian Dorey

34,076 views • 12 days ago

🚨BREAKING: .30-caliber bullet fragments recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy. "Did you measure the diameter of the bullet?" "Yes." "What was your reading?" ".286 to .301 inches." "Based on the class characteristics, what weapons could have fired the bullet?" "There were several different .30 caliber class firearms that could have fired the bullet."

🚨BREAKING: .30-caliber bullet fragments recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy. "Did you measure the diameter of the bullet?" "Yes." "What was your reading?" ".286 to .301 inches." "Based on the class characteristics, what weapons could have fired the bullet?" "There were several different .30 caliber class firearms that could have fired the bullet."

KanekoaTheGreat

273,403 views • 1 month ago

‼️🇺🇸: Tyler Robinson's defense calls out ATF/FBI for wanting to use a discontinued "destructive (in their own words)" testing method on Charlie Kirk bullet after THEY FAILED TO MATCH THE BULLET TO TYLER ROBINSON. 👀 This method has been proven to be inaccurate, and since it destroys the fragment, the defense can not independently verify the results. In other words, if the judge allows it, we will know, THE FIX IS IN. 🤨

‼️🇺🇸: Tyler Robinson's defense calls out ATF/FBI for wanting to use a discontinued "destructive (in their own words)" testing method on Charlie Kirk bullet after THEY FAILED TO MATCH THE BULLET TO TYLER ROBINSON. 👀 This method has been proven to be inaccurate, and since it destroys the fragment, the defense can not independently verify the results. In other words, if the judge allows it, we will know, THE FIX IS IN. 🤨

Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸

68,297 views • 4 months ago

We don't accept the fedjacketing from dipshits who jumped from conspiracy theory to conspiracy theory to arrive at the conclusion that Charlie Kirk is still alive (?) These idiots know nothing about ballistics and can't explain why Mossad would've planted the wrong gun.

We don't accept the fedjacketing from dipshits who jumped from conspiracy theory to conspiracy theory to arrive at the conclusion that Charlie Kirk is still alive (?) These idiots know nothing about ballistics and can't explain why Mossad would've planted the wrong gun.

1stclassclips

70,347 views • 8 months ago

🆘EXPOSED: ATF Report Released In New Defense MOTION In Tyler Robinson Case —Proof The FBI is DESPERATE to Destroy their PLANTED Evidence 👀 The "Magic Bullet" narrative just took a catastrophic hit, and the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. We already know the official timeline is built on manufactured evidence. We caught them with the mathematically impossible 7:57 PM Discord confession. We caught them passing off AI-enhanced stairwell photos. We caught them lying about the 9:00 AM doorbell camera timeline thanks to Baron Coleman’s shadow analysis. Now, we have obtained a new legal motion from Tyler Robinson’s defense team regarding the alleged bullet fragment pulled from Charlie Kirk’s body, and the level of federal fuckery is breathtaking. Let’s break down exactly why they are lying to you and why this document actually destroys their entire narrative and how the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. 1⃣ The State claims Charlie Kirk was killed by a .30-06 round from a Mauser rifle. But the newly revealed ATF lab report from September 17, 2025, destroys that theory entirely. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. The ATF explicitly wrote: "Firearms that produce general rifling characteristics similar to those observed on the Exhibit 6A bullet jacket fragment include numerous makes and models." It doesn't prove it came from Tyler's rifle. It proves the fragment is a planted prop designed to roughly match the narrative of the gun they are framing the patsy with, without ever providing a definitive "Source Identification." 2⃣ The ATF Admits It’s a Bust: The ATF examined the deformed bullet jacket fragment (Exhibit 6A) recovered from the autopsy. Their official conclusion? Inconclusive. The fragment could not be identified or excluded as having been fired from the Exhibit 1 Mauser rifle. The rifling characteristics observed on the fragment match "numerous makes and models" of firearms. There was neither sufficient agreement nor sufficient disagreement of individual characteristics to link it to the weapon. 3⃣ Because the ATF report is exculpatory, the State is now moving the fragment to the FBI lab for Virtual Comparison Microscopy (VCM). But here is the insane part: the FBI examiner admitted the fragment is "fragile". To scan it, the FBI claims it may be necessary to use pliers or similar gripping tools to fold back portions of the jacket. The FBI noted that when they received the fragment from the ATF, a small portion was already detached, implying the ATF already bent and altered the evidence. The FBI admitted that using pliers could leave marks and that it is possible additional pieces of the fragment may inadvertently become detached. 4⃣ Tyler Robinson's defense team naturally asked to have their own expert present for this highly destructive process, or at the very least, to have the FBI videotape the examination. The FBI's response? Absolutely not. Their policies do not allow a defense examiner to be present or for the examination to be videotaped. The Reality Check 🧨 Why is the FBI so desperate to take a pair of pliers to a fragile piece of evidence behind closed doors without any cameras rolling? Because they know the fragment doesn't match the rifle. As we have extensively documented, the physics of the wound channel and the lack of a massive exit wound strongly suggest Charlie wasn't hit with a .30-06 bullet at all. The evidence points to a PETN explosive that detonated under his shirt and propelled into his neck. If Charlie was killed by a planted explosive device, then this "fragment" was staged. And now, the FBI is using the guise of "forensic testing" to permanently alter and destroy the fragment with pliers before an independent defense expert can examine it. They are manufacturing the crime scene right in front of us. 👇 SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. Demand that the FBI drop the pliers and allow independent testing.

🆘EXPOSED: ATF Report Released In New Defense MOTION In Tyler Robinson Case —Proof The FBI is DESPERATE to Destroy their PLANTED Evidence 👀 The "Magic Bullet" narrative just took a catastrophic hit, and the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. We already know the official timeline is built on manufactured evidence. We caught them with the mathematically impossible 7:57 PM Discord confession. We caught them passing off AI-enhanced stairwell photos. We caught them lying about the 9:00 AM doorbell camera timeline thanks to Baron Coleman’s shadow analysis. Now, we have obtained a new legal motion from Tyler Robinson’s defense team regarding the alleged bullet fragment pulled from Charlie Kirk’s body, and the level of federal fuckery is breathtaking. Let’s break down exactly why they are lying to you and why this document actually destroys their entire narrative and how the Feds are scrambling to literally destroy the evidence before anyone can look closer. 1⃣ The State claims Charlie Kirk was killed by a .30-06 round from a Mauser rifle. But the newly revealed ATF lab report from September 17, 2025, destroys that theory entirely. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. Calling a fragment ".30-caliber class" is completely generic. The ATF explicitly wrote: "Firearms that produce general rifling characteristics similar to those observed on the Exhibit 6A bullet jacket fragment include numerous makes and models." It doesn't prove it came from Tyler's rifle. It proves the fragment is a planted prop designed to roughly match the narrative of the gun they are framing the patsy with, without ever providing a definitive "Source Identification." 2⃣ The ATF Admits It’s a Bust: The ATF examined the deformed bullet jacket fragment (Exhibit 6A) recovered from the autopsy. Their official conclusion? Inconclusive. The fragment could not be identified or excluded as having been fired from the Exhibit 1 Mauser rifle. The rifling characteristics observed on the fragment match "numerous makes and models" of firearms. There was neither sufficient agreement nor sufficient disagreement of individual characteristics to link it to the weapon. 3⃣ Because the ATF report is exculpatory, the State is now moving the fragment to the FBI lab for Virtual Comparison Microscopy (VCM). But here is the insane part: the FBI examiner admitted the fragment is "fragile". To scan it, the FBI claims it may be necessary to use pliers or similar gripping tools to fold back portions of the jacket. The FBI noted that when they received the fragment from the ATF, a small portion was already detached, implying the ATF already bent and altered the evidence. The FBI admitted that using pliers could leave marks and that it is possible additional pieces of the fragment may inadvertently become detached. 4⃣ Tyler Robinson's defense team naturally asked to have their own expert present for this highly destructive process, or at the very least, to have the FBI videotape the examination. The FBI's response? Absolutely not. Their policies do not allow a defense examiner to be present or for the examination to be videotaped. The Reality Check 🧨 Why is the FBI so desperate to take a pair of pliers to a fragile piece of evidence behind closed doors without any cameras rolling? Because they know the fragment doesn't match the rifle. As we have extensively documented, the physics of the wound channel and the lack of a massive exit wound strongly suggest Charlie wasn't hit with a .30-06 bullet at all. The evidence points to a PETN explosive that detonated under his shirt and propelled into his neck. If Charlie was killed by a planted explosive device, then this "fragment" was staged. And now, the FBI is using the guise of "forensic testing" to permanently alter and destroy the fragment with pliers before an independent defense expert can examine it. They are manufacturing the crime scene right in front of us. 👇 SHARE THIS EVERYWHERE. Demand that the FBI drop the pliers and allow independent testing.

Project Constitution

52,190 views • 4 months ago

HOLY SH*T: Candace Owens just said the bullet fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk's neck was not definitively from a .30-60. She says his death certificate should have specified what caliber bullet fatally stuck him, and it doesn't. However, Charlie's neck did stop a bullet.

HOLY SH*T: Candace Owens just said the bullet fragment recovered from Charlie Kirk's neck was not definitively from a .30-60. She says his death certificate should have specified what caliber bullet fatally stuck him, and it doesn't. However, Charlie's neck did stop a bullet.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

38,803 views • 10 months ago

NEW BALLISTICS REPORT IN CHARLIE KIRK'S TRIAL: "NOT NEW TO DEFENSE" "That report was done months and months ago. Revealed that bullet...it was 30 caliber. They h ave the info they need...against the delay the defense has asked for. It is time to press on." Libby Emmons Jack Posobiec

NEW BALLISTICS REPORT IN CHARLIE KIRK'S TRIAL: "NOT NEW TO DEFENSE" "That report was done months and months ago. Revealed that bullet...it was 30 caliber. They h ave the info they need...against the delay the defense has asked for. It is time to press on." Libby Emmons Jack Posobiec

Real America's Voice (RAV)

16,652 views • 4 months ago

0% of ballistics tests have shown the FBI 30-06 narrative. 0% That’s why they all have to say “OMG hunt much?!?! You’re sooo stupid.” Ok so show it. “Show it?! OMG look at my math!!! And look at my smug face!!! That’s all the proof I need!!!!” Literally ZERO chance the 30-06 did what they say it did.

0% of ballistics tests have shown the FBI 30-06 narrative. 0% That’s why they all have to say “OMG hunt much?!?! You’re sooo stupid.” Ok so show it. “Show it?! OMG look at my math!!! And look at my smug face!!! That’s all the proof I need!!!!” Literally ZERO chance the 30-06 did what they say it did.

Owen Benjamin 🐻

320,506 views • 8 months ago

Former Army Ranger Matt Tardio came on today to debunk the "exploding microphone" theory and explain the science behind the .30-06 bullet that killed Charlie. We don't like doing segments like this one, but it's necessary to fight the cultists committed to helping Tyler Robinson escape justice at all costs.

Former Army Ranger Matt Tardio came on today to debunk the "exploding microphone" theory and explain the science behind the .30-06 bullet that killed Charlie. We don't like doing segments like this one, but it's necessary to fight the cultists committed to helping Tyler Robinson escape justice at all costs.

Blake Neff

882,961 views • 24 days ago

@realemilycompagno on Democrats RAGING after the DNC releases a SLOPPY autopsy report. Didn't we know all of this already? 🤔

@realemilycompagno on Democrats RAGING after the DNC releases a SLOPPY autopsy report. Didn't we know all of this already? 🤔

The Five

14,503 views • 2 months ago

Objective Analysis of the Charlie Kirk .30-06 Ballistics Joseph Scott Morgan, a highly experienced Medicolegal Death Investigator, joins Julian Dorey for a full examination of the Charlie Kirk ballistics. He addresses the absence of an exit wound, the physics behind the shirt movement, and has interesting things to say about the "exploding mic". Go watch the full video:

Objective Analysis of the Charlie Kirk .30-06 Ballistics Joseph Scott Morgan, a highly experienced Medicolegal Death Investigator, joins Julian Dorey for a full examination of the Charlie Kirk ballistics. He addresses the absence of an exit wound, the physics behind the shirt movement, and has interesting things to say about the "exploding mic". Go watch the full video:

Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

19,942 views • 20 days ago

Candace on the bullet evidence: 9/25 — Too fragmented to match Tyler's rifle 10/10 — Stopped by Charlie's neck; a fragment was recovered 12/18 — Actually a frangible bullet, designed to turn to powder 4/1 — "Bullet now conveniently reduced to a fragment"🤡 Video: Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

Candace on the bullet evidence: 9/25 — Too fragmented to match Tyler's rifle 10/10 — Stopped by Charlie's neck; a fragment was recovered 12/18 — Actually a frangible bullet, designed to turn to powder 4/1 — "Bullet now conveniently reduced to a fragment"🤡 Video: Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

KanekoaTheGreat

107,219 views • 4 months ago

Howard Lutnick on the Intel, $INTC, deal: How much money have we made? $40 billion, 3 months... The US is entitled to 10% of their company... the chairman says: you have a deal!"

Howard Lutnick on the Intel, $INTC, deal: How much money have we made? $40 billion, 3 months... The US is entitled to 10% of their company... the chairman says: you have a deal!"

unusual_whales

448,443 views • 8 months ago

I have found what happened to the bullet in Charlie Kirk's neck. I am challenging Ian Carroll to review the evidence I present in this video and change his view on his position that 30-06 is inconsistent with the injuries of Charlie. In summary, the bullet had a yaw of repose induced by the angle of elevation of the shooting position. This increased yaw of repose still allowed enough energy to pierce the skin at the entry point of the bullet, but induced a tumbling of the bullet internally. As it tumbled, it reached an angled approach toward what would have been the exit skin point. Being angled at the point of exit, the bullet couldn't pierce through the back of the skin, so it instead stretched the skin. The skin's elasticity as it returned part of the stretch energy to the bullet threw it back inside Charlie's body, traveling only minimally and getting stopped around the spinal cord. My position on the plausibility and in fact likelihood of this scenario is based on mathematical ballistics modeling, live tests of 30-06 bullets, several hunter reports as well as personal surgical experience and finally, video from the assassination itself. This is an ironclad destruction of Ian Carroll's claim to Nicholas J. Fuentes that the 30-06 story is implausible. It is indeed very likely, and I respectfully ask Ian Carroll, whom I respect, to review his stance in light of this evidence. Full show at:

I have found what happened to the bullet in Charlie Kirk's neck. I am challenging Ian Carroll to review the evidence I present in this video and change his view on his position that 30-06 is inconsistent with the injuries of Charlie. In summary, the bullet had a yaw of repose induced by the angle of elevation of the shooting position. This increased yaw of repose still allowed enough energy to pierce the skin at the entry point of the bullet, but induced a tumbling of the bullet internally. As it tumbled, it reached an angled approach toward what would have been the exit skin point. Being angled at the point of exit, the bullet couldn't pierce through the back of the skin, so it instead stretched the skin. The skin's elasticity as it returned part of the stretch energy to the bullet threw it back inside Charlie's body, traveling only minimally and getting stopped around the spinal cord. My position on the plausibility and in fact likelihood of this scenario is based on mathematical ballistics modeling, live tests of 30-06 bullets, several hunter reports as well as personal surgical experience and finally, video from the assassination itself. This is an ironclad destruction of Ian Carroll's claim to Nicholas J. Fuentes that the 30-06 story is implausible. It is indeed very likely, and I respectfully ask Ian Carroll, whom I respect, to review his stance in light of this evidence. Full show at:

Jean-François Gariépy 🧬

323,775 views • 8 months ago

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely! According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀 On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter. In other words, there's no match! This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.

🚨Baron Coleman just uncovered a crucial detail that undermines the 30-06 narrative completely! According to this expert’s testimony, the range for size of the bullet recovered from Charlie was between .286 and .301 inches in diameter. 👀 On the other hand, a 30-06 bullet is a projectile that measures .308 inches in diameter. In other words, there's no match! This expert’s testimony eliminates the possibility that the bullet was a 30-06, thereby exonerating Tyler Robinson of all charges.

Travis

172,231 views • 1 month ago