Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

That coochie biting she made him nut two or three times real quick in the park. #ebonyslut #ebony #slut #public #سالب_الرياضً #ebonypyt #موجب_الرِياض #سالب_الرياضً #cute #blackgirls #bbw #blacktaboo #blackslut #creampie #wataa #cnc #bbl #thick #deepthroat

Ask4quaa's profile picture

john wetherspoon

90,848 subscribers

479,087 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

NSFW#ebonyslut#ebony#slut#public#سالب_الرياضً#ebonypyt#موجب_الرِياض#سالب_الرياضً#cute#blackgirls#bbw#blacktaboo#blackslut#creampie#wataa#cnc#bbl#thick#deepthroat
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

When it comes to dating, there’s always this debate—drinks versus dinner versus coffee, all of that. My view is pretty simple: if you’re going to go out for drinks, especially at a cocktail bar, you might as well just get dinner. By the time you’ve had two or three rounds, you’ve basically spent the same amount of time and money you would have on a main course and a drink anyway. I think part of the hesitation—especially for guys—is not wanting to invest in a full dinner. There’s this feeling of, “Do I really want to spend two or three hours with this person if I’m not even sure I’ll like them?” And that’s fair. But at the same time, there’s some interesting research suggesting that people actually feel closer to each other when they share a meal. So if you do like the person, dinner can be a better starting point for building something real. The way around that initial uncertainty is simple. If you don’t know the person—say you met on an app—just do a quick FaceTime call first. Five or ten minutes. It’s basically a vibe check. You get a sense of the chemistry, and you can see if they actually look like their pictures. I was in an Uber a couple weeks ago in Austin, and my driver—she was probably in her fifties, recently divorced—was telling me about going on dates. She said half the time the guy’s photos show him with hair, and then she meets him and he’s bald. And she was like, “I’m not trying to date a bald man. If he goes bald while we’re together, fine, but I’m not starting there.” And I told her the same thing: just do a quick FaceTime call beforehand. It solves a lot of that. So my basic recommendation is: quick FaceTime call, then dinner. Skip the whole “let’s just grab drinks and feel it out” approach. If you’re going to meet, just have a normal date.
1:33

When it comes to dating, there’s always this debate—drinks versus dinner versus coffee, all of that. My view is pretty simple: if you’re going to go out for drinks, especially at a cocktail bar, you might as well just get dinner. By the time you’ve had two or three rounds, you’ve basically spent the same amount of time and money you would have on a main course and a drink anyway. I think part of the hesitation—especially for guys—is not wanting to invest in a full dinner. There’s this feeling of, “Do I really want to spend two or three hours with this person if I’m not even sure I’ll like them?” And that’s fair. But at the same time, there’s some interesting research suggesting that people actually feel closer to each other when they share a meal. So if you do like the person, dinner can be a better starting point for building something real. The way around that initial uncertainty is simple. If you don’t know the person—say you met on an app—just do a quick FaceTime call first. Five or ten minutes. It’s basically a vibe check. You get a sense of the chemistry, and you can see if they actually look like their pictures. I was in an Uber a couple weeks ago in Austin, and my driver—she was probably in her fifties, recently divorced—was telling me about going on dates. She said half the time the guy’s photos show him with hair, and then she meets him and he’s bald. And she was like, “I’m not trying to date a bald man. If he goes bald while we’re together, fine, but I’m not starting there.” And I told her the same thing: just do a quick FaceTime call beforehand. It solves a lot of that. So my basic recommendation is: quick FaceTime call, then dinner. Skip the whole “let’s just grab drinks and feel it out” approach. If you’re going to meet, just have a normal date.

Rob Henderson

65,361 次观看 • 3 个月前

Ever had to buy a lock… for your own bathroom… because of your own child? This mom was at Lowe’s picking up a $156 Kwikset smart code lock after hitting her absolute limit. She’s asked her son multiple times not to go into that particular bathroom, but he kept using it anyway. She has three bathrooms and two kids at home — one son leaves the bathroom an absolute disaster every single time.Piles of flossers next to the trash can, never cleaning up, ignoring requests to bleach it… even after she gave him his own bathroom. When she walked in the last time and it was still disgusting (after she’d specifically asked him to clean it), that was it. She keeps saying how absurd it feels — but sometimes boundaries have to be this clear. I'm trying to figure out why she didn't take away his video games until either the bathroom was cleaned or he stopped using the bathroom entirely. Real talk, parents… have you ever had to go to extreme measures like this with your kids over cleanliness, disrespect, or just plain teenage chaos?
3:42

Ever had to buy a lock… for your own bathroom… because of your own child? This mom was at Lowe’s picking up a $156 Kwikset smart code lock after hitting her absolute limit. She’s asked her son multiple times not to go into that particular bathroom, but he kept using it anyway. She has three bathrooms and two kids at home — one son leaves the bathroom an absolute disaster every single time.Piles of flossers next to the trash can, never cleaning up, ignoring requests to bleach it… even after she gave him his own bathroom. When she walked in the last time and it was still disgusting (after she’d specifically asked him to clean it), that was it. She keeps saying how absurd it feels — but sometimes boundaries have to be this clear. I'm trying to figure out why she didn't take away his video games until either the bathroom was cleaned or he stopped using the bathroom entirely. Real talk, parents… have you ever had to go to extreme measures like this with your kids over cleanliness, disrespect, or just plain teenage chaos?

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

276,408 次观看 • 3 个月前

There’s a “cute guy” on the plane… and suddenly the entire crew is invested... A woman spots him mid-flight and decides; this is her moment. Heart racing, hands shaking, she grabs a napkin and says: “I’ve never been more scared in my life.” Then plot twist… The flight attendants step in like a full-on hype squad; coaching her, encouraging her, helping her write the note like it’s a rom-com happening at 30,000 feet. She delivers it. And the internet HOLDS ITS BREATH… No text back. But TWO FaceTimes… and a flood of messages after the video went viral. Not the ending she expected, but somehow, an even bigger moment. This wasn’t just about one guy… it turned into a reminder that sometimes the boldest moves aren’t about the outcome; they’re about having the courage to try. Be real—would you ever shoot your shot like this on a plane… or are you staying quiet and wondering “what if” forever? And do you think the crew crossed a line… or made the moment unforgettable?
0:34

There’s a “cute guy” on the plane… and suddenly the entire crew is invested... A woman spots him mid-flight and decides; this is her moment. Heart racing, hands shaking, she grabs a napkin and says: “I’ve never been more scared in my life.” Then plot twist… The flight attendants step in like a full-on hype squad; coaching her, encouraging her, helping her write the note like it’s a rom-com happening at 30,000 feet. She delivers it. And the internet HOLDS ITS BREATH… No text back. But TWO FaceTimes… and a flood of messages after the video went viral. Not the ending she expected, but somehow, an even bigger moment. This wasn’t just about one guy… it turned into a reminder that sometimes the boldest moves aren’t about the outcome; they’re about having the courage to try. Be real—would you ever shoot your shot like this on a plane… or are you staying quiet and wondering “what if” forever? And do you think the crew crossed a line… or made the moment unforgettable?

Dr.L

3,566,189 次观看 • 4 个月前

There have been plenty of accusations thrown my way, but this one stands out, a pastor going public with claims he hasn’t brought to me or backed up. Scripture sets a clear standard: “Do not admit a charge against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses.” 1 Timothy 5:19 And also: “The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.” Proverbs 18:17. P.S. . Here’s where I stand. Scott has been on The Jeff & Bill Show many times without hesitation. It’s a respected platform, and Jeff and Bill represent different perspectives which is exactly what you want. This doesn’t need a moderator. No middleman. Just two men, live, having a real conversation. The only condition is this we address it all. Scott has made claims that I’m corrupt. There have been allegations coming from his camp and those supporting him. If we’re going to sit down, we put it all on the table and deal with it directly, in front of the people. If we can’t do that man to man, that says something about one or both of us. I don’t need a controlled environment. I don’t need conditions beyond the truth being addressed. I’m ready to show up, speak plainly, and let the people decide. Jeff and Bill can host, it’s their show. That’s more than fair. Remember, it was on their show that he said this, it will be on their show he defends his positions or course corrects as an honorable man and apologizes.
1:22

There have been plenty of accusations thrown my way, but this one stands out, a pastor going public with claims he hasn’t brought to me or backed up. Scripture sets a clear standard: “Do not admit a charge against an elder except on the evidence of two or three witnesses.” 1 Timothy 5:19 And also: “The one who states his case first seems right, until the other comes and examines him.” Proverbs 18:17. P.S. . Here’s where I stand. Scott has been on The Jeff & Bill Show many times without hesitation. It’s a respected platform, and Jeff and Bill represent different perspectives which is exactly what you want. This doesn’t need a moderator. No middleman. Just two men, live, having a real conversation. The only condition is this we address it all. Scott has made claims that I’m corrupt. There have been allegations coming from his camp and those supporting him. If we’re going to sit down, we put it all on the table and deal with it directly, in front of the people. If we can’t do that man to man, that says something about one or both of us. I don’t need a controlled environment. I don’t need conditions beyond the truth being addressed. I’m ready to show up, speak plainly, and let the people decide. Jeff and Bill can host, it’s their show. That’s more than fair. Remember, it was on their show that he said this, it will be on their show he defends his positions or course corrects as an honorable man and apologizes.

Victor Marx

13,221 次观看 • 3 个月前

With The January 6th Footage Being Released Today By Speaker Johnson Proving Literal Treason, Now Seems Like The Perfect Time To Reflect On This On The Record Evidence That Nancy Pelosi Spoke With The Chief of the Capitol Police SEVERAL TIMES On Jan 6th. Nancy Pelosi Was Briefed About What Was Going On 🚨 “A second set here. In a press conference on January 7th, Speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. I am calling for the resignation of the Chief of the Capitol Police, Mr. Sund, and I have received notice from Mr. Irving that he will be submitting his resignation. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol, but according to your transcribed interview... You're on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Well, let me just say this. Many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely and so with such concern for the staff, for the members, for the Capitol, for the Capitol of the United States. Many of them and they deserve our gratitude. But there was a failure of leadership at the top of the Capitol Police. And I think Mr. Sund... uh... he hasn't even called us since this happened i had made aware that i would be saying that we're calling for his resignation can you explain that discrepancy? yeah that is uh... that that is correct i spoke to speaker Pelosi three times uh... that evening and she went on national tv and said i'd never spoken to her but i spoke to her three times the three uh... three times were the first time when i went over to brief at the secure location. I had called House Sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the Vice President. I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the Capitol. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with Mr. Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 534 where I first briefed Speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location, as I was walking away I met up with Mr. Stanger and we started walking over to the Senate to go brief the Senate when Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my second call with Speaker Pelosi. Questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers, I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by 7 p.m. and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 6.25 p.m. I was over at the Senate from the secure location, I mean from where the Senate had been sequestered, and on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over or off site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have been call number three with Speaker Pelosi. So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls, so Speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. That is correct, sir. Let me just say this, many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely.” The real Insurrection at the Capitol done by the Feds and a Treasonous group of people within our own government to subvert American Tax Payers votes for the REAL elected President of the United States, Donald Trump. Release the J6 was a success. Now we need punishments. #J6Footage
2:57

With The January 6th Footage Being Released Today By Speaker Johnson Proving Literal Treason, Now Seems Like The Perfect Time To Reflect On This On The Record Evidence That Nancy Pelosi Spoke With The Chief of the Capitol Police SEVERAL TIMES On Jan 6th. Nancy Pelosi Was Briefed About What Was Going On 🚨 “A second set here. In a press conference on January 7th, Speaker Pelosi called for your resignation on national television. I am calling for the resignation of the Chief of the Capitol Police, Mr. Sund, and I have received notice from Mr. Irving that he will be submitting his resignation. Speaker Pelosi also stated that she had not talked to you since the initial breach of the Capitol, but according to your transcribed interview... You're on the phone with Speaker Pelosi a few times. Well, let me just say this. Many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely and so with such concern for the staff, for the members, for the Capitol, for the Capitol of the United States. Many of them and they deserve our gratitude. But there was a failure of leadership at the top of the Capitol Police. And I think Mr. Sund... uh... he hasn't even called us since this happened i had made aware that i would be saying that we're calling for his resignation can you explain that discrepancy? yeah that is uh... that that is correct i spoke to speaker Pelosi three times uh... that evening and she went on national tv and said i'd never spoken to her but i spoke to her three times the three uh... three times were the first time when i went over to brief at the secure location. I had called House Sergeant Arms Irving, told him I was going over to brief the Vice President. I was also going over to do a personal assessment of the Capitol. At that point, things were getting under control. Went over there, briefed him on when we can get them back into chambers with Mr. Irving being fully aware. He said he wanted to get Speaker Pelosi on the phone. He made a phone call from his cell phone at approximately 534 where I first briefed Speaker Pelosi. The second call was when I left that location, as I was walking away I met up with Mr. Stanger and we started walking over to the Senate to go brief the Senate when Jennifer Hemingway, I believe it was Jennifer Hemingway, handed me the cell phone and it was Emily Barrett's cell phone calling her and it was Speaker Pelosi on the other line. This is my second call with Speaker Pelosi. Questioning the information I'd given to Vice President Pence about when we can get back into chambers, I assured her that information was correct. I could get them back into chambers by 7 p.m. and the call ended. That was call number two. Call number three was 6.25 p.m. I was over at the Senate from the secure location, I mean from where the Senate had been sequestered, and on a cell phone using Robert Karam's cell phone, they dialed leadership who was over or off site at a secure location, and I briefed all of the leadership of the plans to get them back into chambers. That would have been call number three with Speaker Pelosi. So you didn't have one call, you didn't have two calls, you had three calls, so Speaker Pelosi's comments that she didn't speak to you are inaccurate. That is correct, sir. Let me just say this, many of our Capitol Police just acted so bravely.” The real Insurrection at the Capitol done by the Feds and a Treasonous group of people within our own government to subvert American Tax Payers votes for the REAL elected President of the United States, Donald Trump. Release the J6 was a success. Now we need punishments. #J6Footage

Wall Street Apes

855,914 次观看 • 2 年前

I do not feel any pity for this Roby Ekpo guy for the simple reason that he did everything that you must not do as a man. 1. He married a divorcee. Every man in his right senses knows that you should never marry a divorced woman or a single mother. You should only sleep with them 3 to 5 times and discard them exactly the way their initial husband did. A man must start a family, not join one. 2. He married her after just five months of dating. A marriage proposal that a woman got on a platter will never be appreciated. If she had to wait for at least two years before getting the marriage proposal from him, she probably would have appreciated the marriage more. 3. He cried over a woman. The only reason you should cry over a woman is if she dies and was good to you when she was alive. 4. He couldn't satisfy her in bed. This is solely because the woman he married has been with multiple men and cannot be satisfied by one man anymore. This is why you should only marry a woman you met as a virgin and who is between the ages of 19 and 23 when you start dating her. 5. He sent her abroad while he remained in Nigeria. A woman that you send abroad will find your replacement in less than 3 months. And if she must go abroad, let her go with majorly her own money or with a loan from you (through proxies). Never fully foot the bill so that when she leaves, you will at least get your money back. 6. He is not polygamous. You can do everything right and a woman will still cheat on you, but when you have about three other women who will easily replace her, you will not go through so much heartbreak and definitely not cry on a podcast. 7. He said the Mayowa lady made him hate Nedu and other people who did not offend him. Once a woman can control who you can and cannot relate with, she has successfully made you her slave. As a man, you must be able to relate with whoever you want whether your woman likes it or not. She can either live with it or pack and leave. I wish him well but he is the perfect representation of a foolish man.
0:56

I do not feel any pity for this Roby Ekpo guy for the simple reason that he did everything that you must not do as a man. 1. He married a divorcee. Every man in his right senses knows that you should never marry a divorced woman or a single mother. You should only sleep with them 3 to 5 times and discard them exactly the way their initial husband did. A man must start a family, not join one. 2. He married her after just five months of dating. A marriage proposal that a woman got on a platter will never be appreciated. If she had to wait for at least two years before getting the marriage proposal from him, she probably would have appreciated the marriage more. 3. He cried over a woman. The only reason you should cry over a woman is if she dies and was good to you when she was alive. 4. He couldn't satisfy her in bed. This is solely because the woman he married has been with multiple men and cannot be satisfied by one man anymore. This is why you should only marry a woman you met as a virgin and who is between the ages of 19 and 23 when you start dating her. 5. He sent her abroad while he remained in Nigeria. A woman that you send abroad will find your replacement in less than 3 months. And if she must go abroad, let her go with majorly her own money or with a loan from you (through proxies). Never fully foot the bill so that when she leaves, you will at least get your money back. 6. He is not polygamous. You can do everything right and a woman will still cheat on you, but when you have about three other women who will easily replace her, you will not go through so much heartbreak and definitely not cry on a podcast. 7. He said the Mayowa lady made him hate Nedu and other people who did not offend him. Once a woman can control who you can and cannot relate with, she has successfully made you her slave. As a man, you must be able to relate with whoever you want whether your woman likes it or not. She can either live with it or pack and leave. I wish him well but he is the perfect representation of a foolish man.

Ayo-Elesho

15,301 次观看 • 3 个月前

$4,500 in stolen perfume, a chaotic police brawl, and a "she’s pregnant!" scream that didn't stop the cuffs. ​This Ulta Beauty shoplifting takedown went from 0 to 100 real quick. ​Here is the wild story of Amira and Sierra—and how hitting the same store three times completely backfired: Two young women, Amira and Sierra, were confronted by law enforcement outside an Ulta Beauty store. Officers arrived at the scene following reports that the individuals had entered the establishment and allegedly shoplifted merchandise. According to police statements, this was the third time the suspects had targeted the retail location. ​Upon being approached by the investigating officers, the confrontation quickly escalated. Amira refused to comply with requests to step aside for questioning or provide her identification. She repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, stating that she was waiting for roadside assistance after locking her keys in her vehicle. As the officers continued their investigation, they noted that the suspects were in possession of bags containing a large quantity of merchandise. The tension reached a peak when officers attempted to detain Amira for further inquiry and obstruction. ​The situations for both suspects unfolded as follows: ​Amira became highly combative, physically resisting the officers' attempts to place her in handcuffs. She screamed, pulled away, and actively fought back against multiple officers trying to secure her. During the struggle, Sierra intervened, filming the encounter on her phone. She repeatedly yelled at the officers to stop, claiming that she was pregnant and that their physical force could cause injury. Despite the warnings and shouting from both women, officers proceeded to force Amira into the back of a police cruiser. ​Once secured inside the police vehicle, Amira continued her aggressive behavior by violently kicking the interior components of the cruiser, causing damage to the door panel and window area. ​An inventory of the bags carried by the women revealed that they had accumulated over $4,500 worth of luxury fragrances from their alleged shoplifting incidents. Following the incident, both individuals were taken into custody and faced numerous criminal charges: ​Amira's Charges ​Shoplifting (Two counts) ​Obstructing the Administration of Law ​Resisting Arrest ​Aggravated Assault on a Law Enforcement Officer ​Disorderly Conduct ​Criminal Mischief (relating to the police vehicle damage) Sierra's Charges ​Shoplifting (Two counts) ​Obstructing the Administration of Law ​Resisting Arrest ​Hindering Apprehension Play stupid games, win 6 different criminal charges. It turns out "customer loyalty" doesn't apply to hitting the same Ulta three times.
11:21

$4,500 in stolen perfume, a chaotic police brawl, and a "she’s pregnant!" scream that didn't stop the cuffs. ​This Ulta Beauty shoplifting takedown went from 0 to 100 real quick. ​Here is the wild story of Amira and Sierra—and how hitting the same store three times completely backfired: Two young women, Amira and Sierra, were confronted by law enforcement outside an Ulta Beauty store. Officers arrived at the scene following reports that the individuals had entered the establishment and allegedly shoplifted merchandise. According to police statements, this was the third time the suspects had targeted the retail location. ​Upon being approached by the investigating officers, the confrontation quickly escalated. Amira refused to comply with requests to step aside for questioning or provide her identification. She repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, stating that she was waiting for roadside assistance after locking her keys in her vehicle. As the officers continued their investigation, they noted that the suspects were in possession of bags containing a large quantity of merchandise. The tension reached a peak when officers attempted to detain Amira for further inquiry and obstruction. ​The situations for both suspects unfolded as follows: ​Amira became highly combative, physically resisting the officers' attempts to place her in handcuffs. She screamed, pulled away, and actively fought back against multiple officers trying to secure her. During the struggle, Sierra intervened, filming the encounter on her phone. She repeatedly yelled at the officers to stop, claiming that she was pregnant and that their physical force could cause injury. Despite the warnings and shouting from both women, officers proceeded to force Amira into the back of a police cruiser. ​Once secured inside the police vehicle, Amira continued her aggressive behavior by violently kicking the interior components of the cruiser, causing damage to the door panel and window area. ​An inventory of the bags carried by the women revealed that they had accumulated over $4,500 worth of luxury fragrances from their alleged shoplifting incidents. Following the incident, both individuals were taken into custody and faced numerous criminal charges: ​Amira's Charges ​Shoplifting (Two counts) ​Obstructing the Administration of Law ​Resisting Arrest ​Aggravated Assault on a Law Enforcement Officer ​Disorderly Conduct ​Criminal Mischief (relating to the police vehicle damage) Sierra's Charges ​Shoplifting (Two counts) ​Obstructing the Administration of Law ​Resisting Arrest ​Hindering Apprehension Play stupid games, win 6 different criminal charges. It turns out "customer loyalty" doesn't apply to hitting the same Ulta three times.

✨️Serenitee♡Sam✨️

39,656 次观看 • 2 个月前

A White Lifeguard, Two Black Teens, and a City That Spun the Bullet: Douglass Park Pool Shooting by drkugler June 28, 2025 (Chicago) A white lifeguard shot two Black teens at a West Side pool. One is dead. One is in intensive care. The city’s response? Obfuscation, distraction, and a propaganda blitz to protect its institutions. At 7:03 p.m. on June 26, gunfire erupted near the Douglass Park pool and fieldhouse. Fifteen-year-old Marjay Dotson was shot in the back and died. Fourteen-year-old Jeremy Herred, a student at UIC College Prep and cousin of Laquan McDonald—the 17-year-old whose police killing in 2014 sparked national protests—was shot in the neck and remains hospitalized with possible brain damage. The shooter is confirmed as a 55-year-old white lifeguard employed by the Chicago Park District. A concealed carry holder and military trained, he told responding officers: “Those two kids attacked me and followed me. I defended myself. I have a license.” He was found kneeling beside his bicycle with a 9mm handgun on the pavement next to him. One witness confirmed the teens approached him near the bike. He reached into his bag and fired two shots. "He was knelt down with his hand overtop of his gun. His right hand on top of his gun, his left hand on top of his backpack," said witness Lydia Abraham. "He seemed calm. He seemed normal." Sent in from a reader ... "I believe last year that same man had an altercation at that same pool involved troubled youth and had to close and shut down the park early toward the end of summer due to the same acts and threats of violence towards him and his staff." While the lifeguard had been detained, no one has been charged. The Manufactured Narrative Within hours, the media-industrial complex went to work. Block Club Chicago, which branded the shooting a racist hate crime before police confirmed the shooter’s identity, framed the story with emotional quotes, racial outrage, and a ready-made legal villain. Attorney Jeff Neslund, who represented the McDonald family in their civil suit, is now calling for hate crime charges: “There’s absolutely no justification ever to shoot someone in the back, let alone a child.” Park District officials issued a bland statement. Alderwoman Monique Scott, a former Park District employee herself, added: “I can’t see myself waking up, taking a weapon to work, and firing at children.” But no one has addressed the root cause: Why did a city employee feel compelled to bring a gun to work at a public pool? If his fear was justified, this is a collapse of city safety. If it wasn’t, then the Park District hired a man incapable of handling the job. Either way, the system failed—again. Employee Protection or Executable Offense? According to Illinois law (720 ILCS 5/12-3.05), assaulting a government employee—like a lifeguard—is a felony. If the teens physically confronted the lifeguard prior to the shooting, as the suspect claims, it may form the legal basis for a self-defense case. But if the teens were retreating or non-threatening when the shots were fired, then the lifeguard escalated a conflict into a homicide. What is clear: city systems sent this man to supervise children—armed—without any backup, de-escalation plan, or meaningful oversight. The Week Started with a Murder on the CTA — and Ended in Bloodshed Across Chicago’s Public Spaces If city officials want to portray Douglass Park as an isolated tragedy, they’re ignoring the week that led up to it—and the systemwide failure that followed. It started with a murder on the CTA. On Wednesday, June 25, 42-year-old Jason Rowinski was stabbed to death during an argument aboard a CTA Blue Line train near Rosemont. His attacker, 66-year-old Lawrence Strother, plunged a sharp object into his thigh—likely hitting a major artery. Rowinski bled out and died. Strother was arrested hours later and charged with First Degree Murder. That same night, less than an hour later, another mass shooting unfolded inside Ogden Park in Englewood. At 6:52 p.m., gunfire erupted in the 6500 block of South Throop Street, near the park’s swimming pool. A 25-year-old man, a 32-year-old woman, and a 37-year-old man were all shot multiple times by an unknown assailant. Their bloodied clothes, shoes, and hats were left strewn across the pavement as first responders rushed them to the University of Chicago Hospital in serious condition. Police recovered a black sedan, doors open, near the scene. Bullet casings littered the street. A dozen officers processed evidence while local violence interrupters from Integrity & Fidelity Peacekeepers showed up to try to prevent retaliation. “This goes on a lot,” said outreach worker Jason Perry. “We try our best to keep it down as much as possible.” No arrests. No press conferences. No justice. Then, just 24 hours later, came Douglass Park, where a 55-year-old white city employee shot two unarmed Black teens—killing Marjay Dotson and critically wounding Jeremy Herred. And hours after that, CPD fired a shot during a crowd incident in Armstrong Park in Bronzeville. On June 26, at approximately 10:28 p.m., CPD officers approached a large, unruly gathering in Armstrong (Lillian Hardin) Park at 4400 S. St. Lawrence. When an offender pushed an officer and fled, a foot pursuit ensued. The suspect ran around a building and advanced on the officer, who discharged one round. No injuries were reported. A suspect was arrested. The incident is under investigation. Three parks. One train. Four days. Six people attacked with extreme violence. Two dead. No city official held accountable. Yet the mayor shows up with talking points, and the Park District dares to claim: “In spite of this tragic event, Douglass Park remains a safe and vibrant community anchor.” It isn’t. And if parks, pools, and trains are no longer safe for children, working families, or even city employees—then what is? This wasn’t a tragic week. It was a warning shot. And the city is still trying to spin it. The Bottom Line This was not a random act. It was not unforeseeable. It was not isolated. It was the logical result of a broken city placing workers and children into chaotic, violent, under-resourced environments—and then letting them fend for themselves. Two teens were shot. One died. A lifeguard pulled the trigger. The city spun the story. And now, the public is left to bury the truth: Chicago’s parks are not safe. And neither is the system that pretends they are. References Homicide, Person Shot – 1400 block of Sacramento (26 June 2025 7:03 p.m.) Chicago shooting: 3 shot, seriously injured in Ogden Park (25 June 2025) Man fatally stabbed on CTA Blue Line – Jason Rowinski (25 June 2025) Police-involved shooting, Armstrong Park – 4400 S. St. Lawrence (26 June 2025) While there are many rumors floating around ChitownCrimeChasers Facebook post (27 June 2025) Lifeguard tells police teens attacked him (27 June 2025) Families call for hate crime investigation (27 June 2025) Lifeguard questioned, video exists (27 June 2025 11:56 p.m.) Police report confirms lifeguard shooter (27 June 2025) Illinois Criminal Code 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(c) Aggravated Battery Based On Status Of Victim (d) A person commits aggravated battery when, in committing a battery, other than by discharge of a firearm, he or she knows the individual battered to be any of the following: (6) An officer or employee of the State of Illinois, a unit of local government, or a school district, while performing his or her official duties. 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(b) Aggravated Battery Based On Location (c) A person commits aggravated battery when, in committing a battery, other than by the discharge of a firearm, he or she is or the person battered is on or about a public way, public property, a public place of accommodation or amusement, a sports venue, a domestic violence shelter, or in a church, synagogue, mosque, or other building, structure, or place used for religious worship. Video Credit Two Teens Shot, One Fatally at Douglass Park by Lifeguard North Lawndale, Chicago Douglass Park Jun 26 7:10:55 PM CDT #ChicagoScanner #Crime #chicago
0:20

A White Lifeguard, Two Black Teens, and a City That Spun the Bullet: Douglass Park Pool Shooting by drkugler June 28, 2025 (Chicago) A white lifeguard shot two Black teens at a West Side pool. One is dead. One is in intensive care. The city’s response? Obfuscation, distraction, and a propaganda blitz to protect its institutions. At 7:03 p.m. on June 26, gunfire erupted near the Douglass Park pool and fieldhouse. Fifteen-year-old Marjay Dotson was shot in the back and died. Fourteen-year-old Jeremy Herred, a student at UIC College Prep and cousin of Laquan McDonald—the 17-year-old whose police killing in 2014 sparked national protests—was shot in the neck and remains hospitalized with possible brain damage. The shooter is confirmed as a 55-year-old white lifeguard employed by the Chicago Park District. A concealed carry holder and military trained, he told responding officers: “Those two kids attacked me and followed me. I defended myself. I have a license.” He was found kneeling beside his bicycle with a 9mm handgun on the pavement next to him. One witness confirmed the teens approached him near the bike. He reached into his bag and fired two shots. "He was knelt down with his hand overtop of his gun. His right hand on top of his gun, his left hand on top of his backpack," said witness Lydia Abraham. "He seemed calm. He seemed normal." Sent in from a reader ... "I believe last year that same man had an altercation at that same pool involved troubled youth and had to close and shut down the park early toward the end of summer due to the same acts and threats of violence towards him and his staff." While the lifeguard had been detained, no one has been charged. The Manufactured Narrative Within hours, the media-industrial complex went to work. Block Club Chicago, which branded the shooting a racist hate crime before police confirmed the shooter’s identity, framed the story with emotional quotes, racial outrage, and a ready-made legal villain. Attorney Jeff Neslund, who represented the McDonald family in their civil suit, is now calling for hate crime charges: “There’s absolutely no justification ever to shoot someone in the back, let alone a child.” Park District officials issued a bland statement. Alderwoman Monique Scott, a former Park District employee herself, added: “I can’t see myself waking up, taking a weapon to work, and firing at children.” But no one has addressed the root cause: Why did a city employee feel compelled to bring a gun to work at a public pool? If his fear was justified, this is a collapse of city safety. If it wasn’t, then the Park District hired a man incapable of handling the job. Either way, the system failed—again. Employee Protection or Executable Offense? According to Illinois law (720 ILCS 5/12-3.05), assaulting a government employee—like a lifeguard—is a felony. If the teens physically confronted the lifeguard prior to the shooting, as the suspect claims, it may form the legal basis for a self-defense case. But if the teens were retreating or non-threatening when the shots were fired, then the lifeguard escalated a conflict into a homicide. What is clear: city systems sent this man to supervise children—armed—without any backup, de-escalation plan, or meaningful oversight. The Week Started with a Murder on the CTA — and Ended in Bloodshed Across Chicago’s Public Spaces If city officials want to portray Douglass Park as an isolated tragedy, they’re ignoring the week that led up to it—and the systemwide failure that followed. It started with a murder on the CTA. On Wednesday, June 25, 42-year-old Jason Rowinski was stabbed to death during an argument aboard a CTA Blue Line train near Rosemont. His attacker, 66-year-old Lawrence Strother, plunged a sharp object into his thigh—likely hitting a major artery. Rowinski bled out and died. Strother was arrested hours later and charged with First Degree Murder. That same night, less than an hour later, another mass shooting unfolded inside Ogden Park in Englewood. At 6:52 p.m., gunfire erupted in the 6500 block of South Throop Street, near the park’s swimming pool. A 25-year-old man, a 32-year-old woman, and a 37-year-old man were all shot multiple times by an unknown assailant. Their bloodied clothes, shoes, and hats were left strewn across the pavement as first responders rushed them to the University of Chicago Hospital in serious condition. Police recovered a black sedan, doors open, near the scene. Bullet casings littered the street. A dozen officers processed evidence while local violence interrupters from Integrity & Fidelity Peacekeepers showed up to try to prevent retaliation. “This goes on a lot,” said outreach worker Jason Perry. “We try our best to keep it down as much as possible.” No arrests. No press conferences. No justice. Then, just 24 hours later, came Douglass Park, where a 55-year-old white city employee shot two unarmed Black teens—killing Marjay Dotson and critically wounding Jeremy Herred. And hours after that, CPD fired a shot during a crowd incident in Armstrong Park in Bronzeville. On June 26, at approximately 10:28 p.m., CPD officers approached a large, unruly gathering in Armstrong (Lillian Hardin) Park at 4400 S. St. Lawrence. When an offender pushed an officer and fled, a foot pursuit ensued. The suspect ran around a building and advanced on the officer, who discharged one round. No injuries were reported. A suspect was arrested. The incident is under investigation. Three parks. One train. Four days. Six people attacked with extreme violence. Two dead. No city official held accountable. Yet the mayor shows up with talking points, and the Park District dares to claim: “In spite of this tragic event, Douglass Park remains a safe and vibrant community anchor.” It isn’t. And if parks, pools, and trains are no longer safe for children, working families, or even city employees—then what is? This wasn’t a tragic week. It was a warning shot. And the city is still trying to spin it. The Bottom Line This was not a random act. It was not unforeseeable. It was not isolated. It was the logical result of a broken city placing workers and children into chaotic, violent, under-resourced environments—and then letting them fend for themselves. Two teens were shot. One died. A lifeguard pulled the trigger. The city spun the story. And now, the public is left to bury the truth: Chicago’s parks are not safe. And neither is the system that pretends they are. References Homicide, Person Shot – 1400 block of Sacramento (26 June 2025 7:03 p.m.) Chicago shooting: 3 shot, seriously injured in Ogden Park (25 June 2025) Man fatally stabbed on CTA Blue Line – Jason Rowinski (25 June 2025) Police-involved shooting, Armstrong Park – 4400 S. St. Lawrence (26 June 2025) While there are many rumors floating around ChitownCrimeChasers Facebook post (27 June 2025) Lifeguard tells police teens attacked him (27 June 2025) Families call for hate crime investigation (27 June 2025) Lifeguard questioned, video exists (27 June 2025 11:56 p.m.) Police report confirms lifeguard shooter (27 June 2025) Illinois Criminal Code 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(c) Aggravated Battery Based On Status Of Victim (d) A person commits aggravated battery when, in committing a battery, other than by discharge of a firearm, he or she knows the individual battered to be any of the following: (6) An officer or employee of the State of Illinois, a unit of local government, or a school district, while performing his or her official duties. 720 ILCS 5/12-3.05(b) Aggravated Battery Based On Location (c) A person commits aggravated battery when, in committing a battery, other than by the discharge of a firearm, he or she is or the person battered is on or about a public way, public property, a public place of accommodation or amusement, a sports venue, a domestic violence shelter, or in a church, synagogue, mosque, or other building, structure, or place used for religious worship. Video Credit Two Teens Shot, One Fatally at Douglass Park by Lifeguard North Lawndale, Chicago Douglass Park Jun 26 7:10:55 PM CDT #ChicagoScanner #Crime #chicago

SubX.News®

88,397 次观看 • 1 年前

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.
0:24

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 次观看 • 6 个月前

EXCLUSIVE — Video captures disputed statement during January 24 ICE protest Video recorded during a January 24 protest captures a moment that raises questions about how allegations of political violence are documented on scene and later characterized in local news reporting. In raw, unedited video recorded at Elizabeth Caruthers Park, a background voice can be heard saying, “The guy in the blue shirt punched Tommy.” The statement is partially obscured by crowd noise but remains audible in the footage. The voice appears to belong to Jennifer Singh (Jennifer Singh), a reporter for KATU who joined the station last fall and was present at the scene. The statement appears to reference Thomas Allen (Tommyboi4209), a counter-protester whom oceanplot recorded being followed by a dozen or more people for much of the protest as it moved through the park. Read in context, the background statement alleges that Allen was struck by another individual. Video from the same period shows Allen being closely trailed by members of the crowd, as well as a man wearing a blue shirt running aggressively toward him. The footage does not independently confirm that Allen was struck. In subsequent reporting attributed to Singh, the incident was characterized differently. KATU reported that “crews also observed a counter-protester identified as Thomas Allen pepper spraying at least three protesters, who seemingly attempted to keep him away from the rally,” and noted that Allen “was arrested by Portland Police in the past during other anti-ICE protests.” The report did not reference an allegation that Allen was struck and instead presented Allen primarily as the source of violence. Allegations of violence at political protests carry significant weight, particularly in a charged national climate where such claims can shape public perception and justify escalation. When on-scene statements are captured on video but later framed differently in broadcast reporting, questions arise about how real-time observations are translated into definitive public narratives. Accurate and complete characterization of these moments is critical to maintaining public trust and ensuring that claims of political violence are reported with appropriate context and care. oceanplot contacted Jennifer Singh for comment regarding the discrepancy between the statement captured on video and her subsequent reporting. She did not respond by publication time.
3:21

EXCLUSIVE — Video captures disputed statement during January 24 ICE protest Video recorded during a January 24 protest captures a moment that raises questions about how allegations of political violence are documented on scene and later characterized in local news reporting. In raw, unedited video recorded at Elizabeth Caruthers Park, a background voice can be heard saying, “The guy in the blue shirt punched Tommy.” The statement is partially obscured by crowd noise but remains audible in the footage. The voice appears to belong to Jennifer Singh (Jennifer Singh), a reporter for KATU who joined the station last fall and was present at the scene. The statement appears to reference Thomas Allen (Tommyboi4209), a counter-protester whom oceanplot recorded being followed by a dozen or more people for much of the protest as it moved through the park. Read in context, the background statement alleges that Allen was struck by another individual. Video from the same period shows Allen being closely trailed by members of the crowd, as well as a man wearing a blue shirt running aggressively toward him. The footage does not independently confirm that Allen was struck. In subsequent reporting attributed to Singh, the incident was characterized differently. KATU reported that “crews also observed a counter-protester identified as Thomas Allen pepper spraying at least three protesters, who seemingly attempted to keep him away from the rally,” and noted that Allen “was arrested by Portland Police in the past during other anti-ICE protests.” The report did not reference an allegation that Allen was struck and instead presented Allen primarily as the source of violence. Allegations of violence at political protests carry significant weight, particularly in a charged national climate where such claims can shape public perception and justify escalation. When on-scene statements are captured on video but later framed differently in broadcast reporting, questions arise about how real-time observations are translated into definitive public narratives. Accurate and complete characterization of these moments is critical to maintaining public trust and ensuring that claims of political violence are reported with appropriate context and care. oceanplot contacted Jennifer Singh for comment regarding the discrepancy between the statement captured on video and her subsequent reporting. She did not respond by publication time.

oceanplot

42,859 次观看 • 6 个月前

Today, May 27, on the same day EU foreign ministers are meeting in Limassol to discuss the possibility of direct dialogue with Russia, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel said in the WDR 0630 podcast that she hopes the war in Ukraine will end "in 10 years - and in such a way that Ukraine is an independent, free, and sovereign country." This is Merkel’s third public appearance on the same platform within ten days, and it coincides with active discussions in Brussels over who could represent the EU in negotiations with Moscow. Merkel’s candidacy as an unofficial diplomatic actor has a fundamental problem: she is simultaneously the most acceptable and the least legitimate option. Her very appearance in the public space looks staged. She's made three public appearances on the same platform within ten days. On May 18, at the WDR Europaforum, Merkel said that Europe is "not using its diplomatic potential sufficiently", then, later that day, she rejected the idea of taking on an official mediator role. Today, May 27, on the WDR 0630 podcast, Angela Merkel said she hopes the war will end "in 10 years." Between these two appearances, Politico published an EU shortlist: Angela Merkel, Alex Stubb, Mario Draghi, and Putin’s negotiator Kirill Dmitriev publicly reacted to Merkel's remarks. The Kremlin is listening to her. The coincidence with the Brussels discussions is too much to be an accident. Merkel is acceptable for this role because she is not discredited like Schröder and not viewed as an enemy by Moscow like Kaja Kallas. But this is a passive quality: "not the worst option" is not the same as "the right choice." The Minsk process is not merely a "ballast," as Brussels diplomats softly describe it. It is a failure that Russia took use of to prepare for a full-scale invasion. Merkel herself admitted in a 2022 interview that Minsk gave Ukraine "time to strengthen itself." But this is simultaneously an admission that the negotiations were conducted not for peace, but for delay. If this is her diplomatic methodology, then Merkel is not suited for a role that requires a real settlement. Merkel is no longer in power - and she herself emphasized this as an argument against her official candidacy. But then another question arises: what is her mandate in the unofficial track? Who authorized her? To whom is she accountable? An unofficial channel without an institutional anchor is either a private initiative the Kremlin can ignore, or parallel diplomacy that undermines the EU’s official position. And, finally, today’s statement about "10 years" undermines Merkel's own claim that Europe is failing to use its diplomatic potential. If a person calling for more active diplomacy is herself setting a decade-long horizon, then this is either an absence of strategy or preparation of public opinion for a frozen conflict. Neither option makes Merkel a strong diplomatic actor.
0:28

Today, May 27, on the same day EU foreign ministers are meeting in Limassol to discuss the possibility of direct dialogue with Russia, former German Chancellor Angela Merkel said in the WDR 0630 podcast that she hopes the war in Ukraine will end "in 10 years - and in such a way that Ukraine is an independent, free, and sovereign country." This is Merkel’s third public appearance on the same platform within ten days, and it coincides with active discussions in Brussels over who could represent the EU in negotiations with Moscow. Merkel’s candidacy as an unofficial diplomatic actor has a fundamental problem: she is simultaneously the most acceptable and the least legitimate option. Her very appearance in the public space looks staged. She's made three public appearances on the same platform within ten days. On May 18, at the WDR Europaforum, Merkel said that Europe is "not using its diplomatic potential sufficiently", then, later that day, she rejected the idea of taking on an official mediator role. Today, May 27, on the WDR 0630 podcast, Angela Merkel said she hopes the war will end "in 10 years." Between these two appearances, Politico published an EU shortlist: Angela Merkel, Alex Stubb, Mario Draghi, and Putin’s negotiator Kirill Dmitriev publicly reacted to Merkel's remarks. The Kremlin is listening to her. The coincidence with the Brussels discussions is too much to be an accident. Merkel is acceptable for this role because she is not discredited like Schröder and not viewed as an enemy by Moscow like Kaja Kallas. But this is a passive quality: "not the worst option" is not the same as "the right choice." The Minsk process is not merely a "ballast," as Brussels diplomats softly describe it. It is a failure that Russia took use of to prepare for a full-scale invasion. Merkel herself admitted in a 2022 interview that Minsk gave Ukraine "time to strengthen itself." But this is simultaneously an admission that the negotiations were conducted not for peace, but for delay. If this is her diplomatic methodology, then Merkel is not suited for a role that requires a real settlement. Merkel is no longer in power - and she herself emphasized this as an argument against her official candidacy. But then another question arises: what is her mandate in the unofficial track? Who authorized her? To whom is she accountable? An unofficial channel without an institutional anchor is either a private initiative the Kremlin can ignore, or parallel diplomacy that undermines the EU’s official position. And, finally, today’s statement about "10 years" undermines Merkel's own claim that Europe is failing to use its diplomatic potential. If a person calling for more active diplomacy is herself setting a decade-long horizon, then this is either an absence of strategy or preparation of public opinion for a frozen conflict. Neither option makes Merkel a strong diplomatic actor.

Anton Gerashchenko

35,400 次观看 • 2 个月前

A man deposited a fake junk mail check for $95,000 as a joke. The bank cleared it. Six lawyers told him it was legally his money. He gave it all back anyway. – Patrick Combs was 29, living in San Francisco in 1995 with $200 in his bank account when a junk mail letter arrived offering him a get-rich-quick scheme. – Inside was a promotional fake check made out in his name for $95,093.35. Printed across the front in clear letters: NOT NEGOTIABLE. – In a moment of dark humor he signed the back with a smiley face and deposited it at an ATM. – He expected the bank to call him laughing. They never called. – Ten days later he checked his balance. $101,217.34. The check had cleared. – The promotional check was so close in design to a real check that it legally qualified as one under banking law. – By the time the bank realized what had happened it was legally too late to recall the funds. – Combs called his brother who told him to move the money immediately. – He tried to withdraw $95,000 in cash. He learned three things. All the large safe deposit boxes were taken, $500 bills no longer existed, and $95,000 in $100 bills did not fit in a small box. – He got a cashier's check instead and locked it in a safe-deposit box. – When the bank finally came for the money a month later they accused him of fraud and threatened police. – He refused to return anything until they admitted in writing that they had made the mistake, not him. – Six different lawyers reviewed his case and told him the money was legally his to keep. – The bank and Combs went to war for five months. He gave interviews on television and in newspapers. The public loved him. – He eventually gave every dollar back. All he wanted in return was a signed letter clearing him of any wrongdoing and lunch with the bank president. He got the letter but not the lunch. – He turned the entire story into a one-man show called Man 1 Bank 0 and performed it 2,000 times across the world. A man deposited a fake check as a joke with a smiley face signature. The tenth-largest bank in America cleared it.
0:26

A man deposited a fake junk mail check for $95,000 as a joke. The bank cleared it. Six lawyers told him it was legally his money. He gave it all back anyway. – Patrick Combs was 29, living in San Francisco in 1995 with $200 in his bank account when a junk mail letter arrived offering him a get-rich-quick scheme. – Inside was a promotional fake check made out in his name for $95,093.35. Printed across the front in clear letters: NOT NEGOTIABLE. – In a moment of dark humor he signed the back with a smiley face and deposited it at an ATM. – He expected the bank to call him laughing. They never called. – Ten days later he checked his balance. $101,217.34. The check had cleared. – The promotional check was so close in design to a real check that it legally qualified as one under banking law. – By the time the bank realized what had happened it was legally too late to recall the funds. – Combs called his brother who told him to move the money immediately. – He tried to withdraw $95,000 in cash. He learned three things. All the large safe deposit boxes were taken, $500 bills no longer existed, and $95,000 in $100 bills did not fit in a small box. – He got a cashier's check instead and locked it in a safe-deposit box. – When the bank finally came for the money a month later they accused him of fraud and threatened police. – He refused to return anything until they admitted in writing that they had made the mistake, not him. – Six different lawyers reviewed his case and told him the money was legally his to keep. – The bank and Combs went to war for five months. He gave interviews on television and in newspapers. The public loved him. – He eventually gave every dollar back. All he wanted in return was a signed letter clearing him of any wrongdoing and lunch with the bank president. He got the letter but not the lunch. – He turned the entire story into a one-man show called Man 1 Bank 0 and performed it 2,000 times across the world. A man deposited a fake check as a joke with a smiley face signature. The tenth-largest bank in America cleared it.

Aisar

3,105,399 次观看 • 1 个月前

Excellent Breakdown Of The Mysterious “Suicide” Of The Hero Police Officer Who Saved 4 Lives During Oklahoma City Bombing Right before he ‘Committed Suicide’ he said, “They're not telling the truth about what's going on down there” “One year after the Oklahoma City bombings, this officer who saved four lives was found unalived under very strange circumstances. On April 19th, 1995, Sergeant Terrence Yeakey responded to calls that a bomb had gone off in the Murroff Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City. Sergeant Yakey was the first person to respond that day and was able to save four people before the second floor collapsed and he injured his back so severely he wasn't able to continue. An hour and a half later, police arrested Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who were anti-government extremists. A year after the bombing, Sergeant Yakey and 90 other officers were selected to receive the city's medal of valor, but just three days before the ceremony, he was found unalived in a field near his hometown of El Reno, Oklahoma. His car was found abandoned along the side of a dirt road, and there was a lot of blood in the car, but his body was found about a mile into the field off of that road. No gun was found on the scene, but he had been shot in the head and he was covered in cuts as well. According to one report, quote, "While still inside his Ford Probe that he had parked on a lonely country road, Yakey slashed himself 11 times on both forearms, twice on his throat, then apparently seeking an even more private place to end his life, he crawled 8,000 feet through rough terrain and climbed a fence before putting a gun to his head, which apparently took him to the hereafter.” He didn't leave a note, there was no investigation or autopsy, but police still immediately ruled that he had taken his own life. Terry had an ex-wife named Tanya who was the mother of his children and she claimed when she picked him up from the hospital after the bombing, he quote, started crying and It's not what they're saying it is. They're not telling the truth about what's going on down there, but wouldn't elaborate any further. She claimed that two or three days after the bombing, he asked her to take him back to the site so he could check for something under the daycare center, but they were turned away. She claimed that his supervisor made him rewrite his report on the bombing and that he started showing up at her house at very strange hours and acting very anxious and afraid. She'd said he'd started gathering up all of their insurance paperwork for her to keep, he wanted them to get remarried so that her daughters would be protected if something happened to him, and she said that he, quote, knew something was coming fast and was trying to protect his family, but he wasn't fast enough. After he passed, she went bankrupt and lost their house, and she said she knew for sure if he'd planned to take his life, he would have made sure that they were taken care of first. His daughters didn't receive a cent of his pension. And Tonya said that the police department was much more concerned with promoting a narrative that he took his own life because he felt guilty for not being able to save more people during the bombing and that he was estranged from his wife and children, which was simply not true. So do you think that he took his own life or do you think somebody took it for him? And either way, why was there no investigation or autopsy performed?”
2:58

Excellent Breakdown Of The Mysterious “Suicide” Of The Hero Police Officer Who Saved 4 Lives During Oklahoma City Bombing Right before he ‘Committed Suicide’ he said, “They're not telling the truth about what's going on down there” “One year after the Oklahoma City bombings, this officer who saved four lives was found unalived under very strange circumstances. On April 19th, 1995, Sergeant Terrence Yeakey responded to calls that a bomb had gone off in the Murroff Federal Building in downtown Oklahoma City. Sergeant Yakey was the first person to respond that day and was able to save four people before the second floor collapsed and he injured his back so severely he wasn't able to continue. An hour and a half later, police arrested Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, who were anti-government extremists. A year after the bombing, Sergeant Yakey and 90 other officers were selected to receive the city's medal of valor, but just three days before the ceremony, he was found unalived in a field near his hometown of El Reno, Oklahoma. His car was found abandoned along the side of a dirt road, and there was a lot of blood in the car, but his body was found about a mile into the field off of that road. No gun was found on the scene, but he had been shot in the head and he was covered in cuts as well. According to one report, quote, "While still inside his Ford Probe that he had parked on a lonely country road, Yakey slashed himself 11 times on both forearms, twice on his throat, then apparently seeking an even more private place to end his life, he crawled 8,000 feet through rough terrain and climbed a fence before putting a gun to his head, which apparently took him to the hereafter.” He didn't leave a note, there was no investigation or autopsy, but police still immediately ruled that he had taken his own life. Terry had an ex-wife named Tanya who was the mother of his children and she claimed when she picked him up from the hospital after the bombing, he quote, started crying and It's not what they're saying it is. They're not telling the truth about what's going on down there, but wouldn't elaborate any further. She claimed that two or three days after the bombing, he asked her to take him back to the site so he could check for something under the daycare center, but they were turned away. She claimed that his supervisor made him rewrite his report on the bombing and that he started showing up at her house at very strange hours and acting very anxious and afraid. She'd said he'd started gathering up all of their insurance paperwork for her to keep, he wanted them to get remarried so that her daughters would be protected if something happened to him, and she said that he, quote, knew something was coming fast and was trying to protect his family, but he wasn't fast enough. After he passed, she went bankrupt and lost their house, and she said she knew for sure if he'd planned to take his life, he would have made sure that they were taken care of first. His daughters didn't receive a cent of his pension. And Tonya said that the police department was much more concerned with promoting a narrative that he took his own life because he felt guilty for not being able to save more people during the bombing and that he was estranged from his wife and children, which was simply not true. So do you think that he took his own life or do you think somebody took it for him? And either way, why was there no investigation or autopsy performed?”

Wall Street Apes

1,971,852 次观看 • 2 年前

Nairobi Man Loses Items Worth Ksh400K After Night Out With Woman A man is seeking public assistance to identify a woman he accuses of drugging him and stealing personal belongings worth over Ksh 400,000 during an encounter that began at a Nairobi club. The complainant claims that after meeting the woman at the club they proceeded to his residence where the alleged theft occurred. He says CCTV footage from both the club and the apartment premises has been retrieved but does not clearly show the woman’s face, which has made identification difficult. Frustrated by what he describes as police inaction, the man is now appealing to the public to help trace the suspect. "Hey Cyprian. I have an issue that I may need your help in identifying a face that stole my items worth Ksh400,000 plus. If you are willing to share out so I can get help on this matter, since the police seem not willing to help out, let me know please. Met this girl at a club after a few drinks we went home and from there we continued drinking. That's when she added something to my drink and stole my MacBook, 1 iPhone 15 Pro Max and two other phones, three pairs of new sneakers, Apple Watch, among other items including foodstuffs that were in the fridge. Reported to the police, collected the footage at our premises but the face ain’t clear enough. She was also avoiding the cameras. Also managed to get the footage from the club, which wasn’t clear either. The police seem to be avoiding this case or rather are playing it low. That’s why I was requesting if possible I can share the footage with you to help me identify her or someone who can enhance the footage to clarity. The lady with the greenish dress."
0:53

Sensitive content

Nairobi Man Loses Items Worth Ksh400K After Night Out With Woman A man is seeking public assistance to identify a woman he accuses of drugging him and stealing personal belongings worth over Ksh 400,000 during an encounter that began at a Nairobi club. The complainant claims that after meeting the woman at the club they proceeded to his residence where the alleged theft occurred. He says CCTV footage from both the club and the apartment premises has been retrieved but does not clearly show the woman’s face, which has made identification difficult. Frustrated by what he describes as police inaction, the man is now appealing to the public to help trace the suspect. "Hey Cyprian. I have an issue that I may need your help in identifying a face that stole my items worth Ksh400,000 plus. If you are willing to share out so I can get help on this matter, since the police seem not willing to help out, let me know please. Met this girl at a club after a few drinks we went home and from there we continued drinking. That's when she added something to my drink and stole my MacBook, 1 iPhone 15 Pro Max and two other phones, three pairs of new sneakers, Apple Watch, among other items including foodstuffs that were in the fridge. Reported to the police, collected the footage at our premises but the face ain’t clear enough. She was also avoiding the cameras. Also managed to get the footage from the club, which wasn’t clear either. The police seem to be avoiding this case or rather are playing it low. That’s why I was requesting if possible I can share the footage with you to help me identify her or someone who can enhance the footage to clarity. The lady with the greenish dress."

Cyprian, Is Nyakundi

96,755 次观看 • 1 年前

Duke Lacrosse Accuser Finally Admits: "I Made Up a Story That Wasn't True" Crystal Mangum, the former stripper at the center of the 2006 Duke University lacrosse scandal, admitted Thursday to fabricating the story that three players raped her during a team party. Speaking from the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women, Mangum confessed in an interview with the independent media outlet “Let’s Talk With Kat.” “[I] made up a story that wasn’t true,” Mangum said. Mangum explained that she made up the allegation because she “wanted validation from people and not from God.” “They trusted me that I wouldn’t betray their trust, and I testified falsely against them by saying that they raped me when they didn’t, and that was wrong,” Magnum added. Mangum, now 46 and serving a prison sentence for the second-degree murder of her boyfriend in 2013, sought forgiveness from the players she accused—David Evans, Collin Finnerty, and Reade Seligmann. Referring to them as her “brothers” in a biblical sense, she said, “I want them to know that I love them, and they didn’t deserve that. I hope that they can forgive me.” Her admission marks the first time she has publicly acknowledged fabricating the rape allegations, nearly two decades after the case shocked the nation. The Duke lacrosse case gained national attention in 2006. Former Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong fueled the tension by asserting that the assault was “racially motivated,” despite a lack of evidence. DNA tests later exonerated the players, but Nifong’s misconduct, including withholding exculpatory evidence, led to his disbarment in 2007. The charges against the players were dismissed in April 2007, with then-North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper declaring the trio innocent. The fallout from the case extended beyond the courtroom. Former Duke President Richard Brodhead faced criticism for his handling of the situation, which included suspending the accused players and canceling the lacrosse season. Brodhead later apologized, admitting, “We did not get it right, causing the families to feel abandoned when they most needed support.” The players subsequently sued Brodhead and Duke University, settling for an undisclosed amount. Casey Johnson, a professor of history at Brooklyn College and co-author of a book on the case "Until Proven Innocent," criticized the news media's shameful handling of the case and the appalling behavior of the Duke faculty. "This case exposed unprecedented misconduct, not just by Nifong, but also by Duke faculty members," he said. "Some faculty members exploited the situation to advance ideological agendas, disregarding fairness, due process, or an impartial evaluation of evidence." "Their actions, alongside one-sided media coverage—most notably by The New York Times —created a narrative of guilt based on stereotypes and assumptions," he continued. "This relentless media bias cemented public opinion before the facts were fully understood." "The Times coverage, which included more than a hundred articles and opinion pieces, portrayed the players as guilty, reinforcing harmful assumptions about privilege, race, and class," he added. "For the players and their families, the ordeal was a harrowing experience. It highlighted how deeply flawed systems in law enforcement, media, and academia could combine to destroy reputations and lives." Professor Johnson summed up the sobering lesson of the Duke Lacrosse case, which has unfortunately been ignored by news media that have pushed countless race hoaxes and have incited riots. "We saw a kind of mob mentality that took hold of the activist wing of the Duke faculty, which culminated in an April 2006 statement signed by 88 Duke faculty members, called the Group of 88, in which before any charges even had been filed, these 88 faculty members took out a full-page ad in the Duke campus newspaper," he said. "They unequivocally asserted that something had happened to Crystal Mangum," he continued. "She was claiming rape. The lacrosse players said nothing happened. They said that they would continue their activism regardless of what the court decided or what the police said. And they thanked public protesters for not waiting and making themselves heard." "And the highest-profile public protest that had occurred at that point had been a march in front of the captain's house in which a protester had carried large signs urging the castration of the lacrosse captains." "So this was a complete abandonment of any pretense of objectivity, of any interest in the truth."
12:24

Duke Lacrosse Accuser Finally Admits: "I Made Up a Story That Wasn't True" Crystal Mangum, the former stripper at the center of the 2006 Duke University lacrosse scandal, admitted Thursday to fabricating the story that three players raped her during a team party. Speaking from the North Carolina Correctional Institution for Women, Mangum confessed in an interview with the independent media outlet “Let’s Talk With Kat.” “[I] made up a story that wasn’t true,” Mangum said. Mangum explained that she made up the allegation because she “wanted validation from people and not from God.” “They trusted me that I wouldn’t betray their trust, and I testified falsely against them by saying that they raped me when they didn’t, and that was wrong,” Magnum added. Mangum, now 46 and serving a prison sentence for the second-degree murder of her boyfriend in 2013, sought forgiveness from the players she accused—David Evans, Collin Finnerty, and Reade Seligmann. Referring to them as her “brothers” in a biblical sense, she said, “I want them to know that I love them, and they didn’t deserve that. I hope that they can forgive me.” Her admission marks the first time she has publicly acknowledged fabricating the rape allegations, nearly two decades after the case shocked the nation. The Duke lacrosse case gained national attention in 2006. Former Durham County District Attorney Mike Nifong fueled the tension by asserting that the assault was “racially motivated,” despite a lack of evidence. DNA tests later exonerated the players, but Nifong’s misconduct, including withholding exculpatory evidence, led to his disbarment in 2007. The charges against the players were dismissed in April 2007, with then-North Carolina Attorney General Roy Cooper declaring the trio innocent. The fallout from the case extended beyond the courtroom. Former Duke President Richard Brodhead faced criticism for his handling of the situation, which included suspending the accused players and canceling the lacrosse season. Brodhead later apologized, admitting, “We did not get it right, causing the families to feel abandoned when they most needed support.” The players subsequently sued Brodhead and Duke University, settling for an undisclosed amount. Casey Johnson, a professor of history at Brooklyn College and co-author of a book on the case "Until Proven Innocent," criticized the news media's shameful handling of the case and the appalling behavior of the Duke faculty. "This case exposed unprecedented misconduct, not just by Nifong, but also by Duke faculty members," he said. "Some faculty members exploited the situation to advance ideological agendas, disregarding fairness, due process, or an impartial evaluation of evidence." "Their actions, alongside one-sided media coverage—most notably by The New York Times —created a narrative of guilt based on stereotypes and assumptions," he continued. "This relentless media bias cemented public opinion before the facts were fully understood." "The Times coverage, which included more than a hundred articles and opinion pieces, portrayed the players as guilty, reinforcing harmful assumptions about privilege, race, and class," he added. "For the players and their families, the ordeal was a harrowing experience. It highlighted how deeply flawed systems in law enforcement, media, and academia could combine to destroy reputations and lives." Professor Johnson summed up the sobering lesson of the Duke Lacrosse case, which has unfortunately been ignored by news media that have pushed countless race hoaxes and have incited riots. "We saw a kind of mob mentality that took hold of the activist wing of the Duke faculty, which culminated in an April 2006 statement signed by 88 Duke faculty members, called the Group of 88, in which before any charges even had been filed, these 88 faculty members took out a full-page ad in the Duke campus newspaper," he said. "They unequivocally asserted that something had happened to Crystal Mangum," he continued. "She was claiming rape. The lacrosse players said nothing happened. They said that they would continue their activism regardless of what the court decided or what the police said. And they thanked public protesters for not waiting and making themselves heard." "And the highest-profile public protest that had occurred at that point had been a march in front of the captain's house in which a protester had carried large signs urging the castration of the lacrosse captains." "So this was a complete abandonment of any pretense of objectivity, of any interest in the truth."

Kyle Becker

140,248 次观看 • 1 年前

Ultra-critical to note: The Constitution is still (unlawfully) suspended because of COVID. Figures like RFK Jr. and Sen. Ron Johnson know COVID was a military operation but are still framing it as a botched public health response. (Tweet 1/5) Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Sarah Westall (Sarah Westall) how "we're [still] in the Twilight Zone" post COVID, as nearly everyone in government—from both sides of the aisle—are pretending that COVID was a public health event when it was, in fact, a military operation. "[A] military framework was used [for COVID], and the public was lied to, as if [it was] a public health event," Latypova says. She notes that while figures like RFK Jr. and Senator Ron Johnson are willing to talk about the "botching" of the COVID response, they refuse to address "the castle" of—unlawful—laws surrounding public health emergencies that completely negate the Constitution. Although Latypova doesn't mention it in this clip, take as one example of the unlawful laws that make up the "castle" of unlawful laws that suspend constitutional rights the PREP Act. The PREP Act, passed in 2005 under George Bush, negates American citizens' right to petition the government for redress of grievances, which is explicitly protected by the First Amendment. I.e. the PREP Act says you can't sue "covered persons" (e.g., "vaccine" manufacturers, doctors, pharmacy personnel) involved in the administration or use of "covered countermeasures" (e.g., "vaccines") in response to public health emergencies. —> This. Liability. Protection. Is. Not. Constitutional. <— "We're in the Twilight Zone. Everyone pretends on both sides of the aisle. I'm accusing both Democrats, Republicans, everyone in Congress [of pretending COVID is a public health response instead of a military operation]," Latypova says. "Since...December 2022, we [have] had sufficient evidence to demonstrate this is a military operation. That [a] military framework was used, and the public was lied to, as if [COVID were] a public health event." "We...compiled this material at the request of Senator Johnson of Wisconsin," Latypova adds. "Senator Johnson, actually, his staffers, set up a Zoom call with me and Katherine [Watt] and a few other people. And he asked us, 'Can you put together a memo for me and, the package of evidence, which we've done?' And it's a two-page memo describing this—what laws have been utilized [for the military operation]... I published all of this and sent it to him in December, 2022. Nothing happened after that." Latypova adds, "As you know, he held several hearings before and after. And to give him credit, he invited me to one, but I couldn't make the schedule. But he's held several hearings, with very high-profile so-called freedom leaders, discussing how COVID was [a] public health response [that] was botched...[but] this wasn't a public health anything, and he knows it." "I give him a lot of credit for calling attention to the victims of this [military operation]," Latypova says. "You know, I'm very grateful that he gave any attention to this, but this wasn't a secret. We've published it many times. I gave it to him. I [also] gave this information to RFK Jr. too. I have a podcast with him recorded—two podcasts, actually. And he knows all of this also...But still, the public perception is being managed, and I don't know what he's gonna do about it." Latypova goes on to say: 'What['s happening] right now is the public opinion is getting managed back into this box of, 'This was a public health event,' and 'This was a public health response. Some mistakes were made, some overreach. Let's fix those things.' But they won't do anything about the castle. The castle is these laws that they're using. These, essentially, military martial law[s] that they have pulled. They suspended the Constitution. They haven't unsuspended it yet. I haven't seen any evidence of this...[And] they've written a mountain of law[s], to do exactly this, starting even maybe in the 1800s. "My friend, Katherine [Watt], started going back and tracing all these legal changes, specifically around the vaccines, even going back to the 1700s. And you can see how this, like, machine is morphing—meaning the federal government, which the Constitution actually is the document that limits the federal government very severely...But [what] they've done since, you know, the late 1700s or or even, you know, mid 1800s, they've done the complete opposite of it. So now the federal government is everything, pretty much. And what they've done in this last last episode [COVID], is they further merged the power of separate federal agencies that are supposed to be separate, supposed to be separately, you know, constrained and regulated. They're not. So since then, they've merged 11 federal agencies into what's called PEMSI [?]. It's a pandemic enterprise."
4:48

Ultra-critical to note: The Constitution is still (unlawfully) suspended because of COVID. Figures like RFK Jr. and Sen. Ron Johnson know COVID was a military operation but are still framing it as a botched public health response. (Tweet 1/5) Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art") describes for Sarah Westall (Sarah Westall) how "we're [still] in the Twilight Zone" post COVID, as nearly everyone in government—from both sides of the aisle—are pretending that COVID was a public health event when it was, in fact, a military operation. "[A] military framework was used [for COVID], and the public was lied to, as if [it was] a public health event," Latypova says. She notes that while figures like RFK Jr. and Senator Ron Johnson are willing to talk about the "botching" of the COVID response, they refuse to address "the castle" of—unlawful—laws surrounding public health emergencies that completely negate the Constitution. Although Latypova doesn't mention it in this clip, take as one example of the unlawful laws that make up the "castle" of unlawful laws that suspend constitutional rights the PREP Act. The PREP Act, passed in 2005 under George Bush, negates American citizens' right to petition the government for redress of grievances, which is explicitly protected by the First Amendment. I.e. the PREP Act says you can't sue "covered persons" (e.g., "vaccine" manufacturers, doctors, pharmacy personnel) involved in the administration or use of "covered countermeasures" (e.g., "vaccines") in response to public health emergencies. —> This. Liability. Protection. Is. Not. Constitutional. <— "We're in the Twilight Zone. Everyone pretends on both sides of the aisle. I'm accusing both Democrats, Republicans, everyone in Congress [of pretending COVID is a public health response instead of a military operation]," Latypova says. "Since...December 2022, we [have] had sufficient evidence to demonstrate this is a military operation. That [a] military framework was used, and the public was lied to, as if [COVID were] a public health event." "We...compiled this material at the request of Senator Johnson of Wisconsin," Latypova adds. "Senator Johnson, actually, his staffers, set up a Zoom call with me and Katherine [Watt] and a few other people. And he asked us, 'Can you put together a memo for me and, the package of evidence, which we've done?' And it's a two-page memo describing this—what laws have been utilized [for the military operation]... I published all of this and sent it to him in December, 2022. Nothing happened after that." Latypova adds, "As you know, he held several hearings before and after. And to give him credit, he invited me to one, but I couldn't make the schedule. But he's held several hearings, with very high-profile so-called freedom leaders, discussing how COVID was [a] public health response [that] was botched...[but] this wasn't a public health anything, and he knows it." "I give him a lot of credit for calling attention to the victims of this [military operation]," Latypova says. "You know, I'm very grateful that he gave any attention to this, but this wasn't a secret. We've published it many times. I gave it to him. I [also] gave this information to RFK Jr. too. I have a podcast with him recorded—two podcasts, actually. And he knows all of this also...But still, the public perception is being managed, and I don't know what he's gonna do about it." Latypova goes on to say: 'What['s happening] right now is the public opinion is getting managed back into this box of, 'This was a public health event,' and 'This was a public health response. Some mistakes were made, some overreach. Let's fix those things.' But they won't do anything about the castle. The castle is these laws that they're using. These, essentially, military martial law[s] that they have pulled. They suspended the Constitution. They haven't unsuspended it yet. I haven't seen any evidence of this...[And] they've written a mountain of law[s], to do exactly this, starting even maybe in the 1800s. "My friend, Katherine [Watt], started going back and tracing all these legal changes, specifically around the vaccines, even going back to the 1700s. And you can see how this, like, machine is morphing—meaning the federal government, which the Constitution actually is the document that limits the federal government very severely...But [what] they've done since, you know, the late 1700s or or even, you know, mid 1800s, they've done the complete opposite of it. So now the federal government is everything, pretty much. And what they've done in this last last episode [COVID], is they further merged the power of separate federal agencies that are supposed to be separate, supposed to be separately, you know, constrained and regulated. They're not. So since then, they've merged 11 federal agencies into what's called PEMSI [?]. It's a pandemic enterprise."

Sense Receptor

15,244 次观看 • 1 年前

The Story Of Malaika Agba – The Woman Who Claimed To Be God Almighty in Alaafia Street Mushin Malaika Agba is known as a sheer terror and resides on Alafia Street by Isolo Road Junction in Mushin, Lagos State in south western part of Nigeria where she holds what I will call an absolute control over her followers and worshippers while simultaneously casting a shadow of gloom and doom upon the neighborhood. As at the time I watched her clip then, she had about 800 -1,000 worshippers but as it stands today, I do not know how many worshippers are still under her overpowering influence. Malaika Agba whose real name is Olayinka Oladipupo was based at Oke Moni at Isiwo-Ijebu in Ogun State. She was born in the same house in Mushin where she declared herself to be a God. As a young lady, she got married and had four kids, three of her kids have all di..ed and she is left with only one daughter. Her church has been described to look like the Cherubim and Seraphim. Her own church is named New Jerusalem Church and located around Alaafia Junction in Mushin, Lagos State, Nigeria. Its services are laced with fast-paced songs, members wearing colourful robes all singing the praises of the almighty and all-knowing Malaika Agba. Infact her church congregation where literary worshiping her after she proclaim herself as God. Malaika Agba is still very much alive and is running her church with a strong grip on her followers and worshippers. She is also accused of sleeping with her church members especially the male. She commands them to sleep with her and they always obey her command. She has no doubt in her mind as she makes the shocking claim that she is God and this same statement she made very clear in her interview with Kola Olawuyi. Actually, what really brought Malaika Agba to limelight was a criminal case filed against her. A 21-year-old girl named Bosede Olaniyi had died in Malaika’s home under very questionable circumstances. The girl was adopted by Malaika Agba when she was around 12 years old. Malaika Agba claimed she knew the mother of the child on a mountain where they prayed but did not really know of the father. She adopted the girl in 1997 and the girl was with her until around 2005 when she died all of a sudden and swiftly buried at the Matori Cemetery on the orders of Malaika Agba who said she was in a service when they called her and told her of Bose’s deth. Malaika Agba later confess that she used to do what she called ‘spiritual surgeries’ for her followers to ‘evacuate the dirtiness in their stomachs’. She had initially claimed that Bose ded after complaining of malaria. Following the outcry from the public, the corpse of the late Bose was exhu..med few weeks after her burial and taken to the Military Hospital at Awolowo Road in Ikoyi, Lagos where forensic pathologists said they notice an accumulation of bacteria around her heart and that under her elbow was a gaping hole of an injection. Malaika Agba later stated that it is true that means that she use to inject her followers when it was time for the ‘spiritual surgery’ What she injected them with cannot be ascertained as at the time of filling this report. Malaika Agba was arrested and detained at the Police Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Headquarters in Panti, Lagos State where she made all her confessions. But at that moment, the case died out and she was freed due to her influence and clout. Kola Olawuyi himself said he had to turn down the heat on the matter because if he pressed on with it, she would have been charged with murder and would most likely go to jail or even worse and that he did not want Nigerians to accuse him of being the one to orchestrate the ja.iling or exe.cution of another person. So he let the case d.|e a natural d.e.a.t.h and many people never heard of Malaika Agba again. Kola Olawuyi later dai and his very resourceful investigative journalism platform faded away. But my interest in the case never waned at any point as I always
8:10

The Story Of Malaika Agba – The Woman Who Claimed To Be God Almighty in Alaafia Street Mushin Malaika Agba is known as a sheer terror and resides on Alafia Street by Isolo Road Junction in Mushin, Lagos State in south western part of Nigeria where she holds what I will call an absolute control over her followers and worshippers while simultaneously casting a shadow of gloom and doom upon the neighborhood. As at the time I watched her clip then, she had about 800 -1,000 worshippers but as it stands today, I do not know how many worshippers are still under her overpowering influence. Malaika Agba whose real name is Olayinka Oladipupo was based at Oke Moni at Isiwo-Ijebu in Ogun State. She was born in the same house in Mushin where she declared herself to be a God. As a young lady, she got married and had four kids, three of her kids have all di..ed and she is left with only one daughter. Her church has been described to look like the Cherubim and Seraphim. Her own church is named New Jerusalem Church and located around Alaafia Junction in Mushin, Lagos State, Nigeria. Its services are laced with fast-paced songs, members wearing colourful robes all singing the praises of the almighty and all-knowing Malaika Agba. Infact her church congregation where literary worshiping her after she proclaim herself as God. Malaika Agba is still very much alive and is running her church with a strong grip on her followers and worshippers. She is also accused of sleeping with her church members especially the male. She commands them to sleep with her and they always obey her command. She has no doubt in her mind as she makes the shocking claim that she is God and this same statement she made very clear in her interview with Kola Olawuyi. Actually, what really brought Malaika Agba to limelight was a criminal case filed against her. A 21-year-old girl named Bosede Olaniyi had died in Malaika’s home under very questionable circumstances. The girl was adopted by Malaika Agba when she was around 12 years old. Malaika Agba claimed she knew the mother of the child on a mountain where they prayed but did not really know of the father. She adopted the girl in 1997 and the girl was with her until around 2005 when she died all of a sudden and swiftly buried at the Matori Cemetery on the orders of Malaika Agba who said she was in a service when they called her and told her of Bose’s deth. Malaika Agba later confess that she used to do what she called ‘spiritual surgeries’ for her followers to ‘evacuate the dirtiness in their stomachs’. She had initially claimed that Bose ded after complaining of malaria. Following the outcry from the public, the corpse of the late Bose was exhu..med few weeks after her burial and taken to the Military Hospital at Awolowo Road in Ikoyi, Lagos where forensic pathologists said they notice an accumulation of bacteria around her heart and that under her elbow was a gaping hole of an injection. Malaika Agba later stated that it is true that means that she use to inject her followers when it was time for the ‘spiritual surgery’ What she injected them with cannot be ascertained as at the time of filling this report. Malaika Agba was arrested and detained at the Police Criminal Investigation Department (CID) Headquarters in Panti, Lagos State where she made all her confessions. But at that moment, the case died out and she was freed due to her influence and clout. Kola Olawuyi himself said he had to turn down the heat on the matter because if he pressed on with it, she would have been charged with murder and would most likely go to jail or even worse and that he did not want Nigerians to accuse him of being the one to orchestrate the ja.iling or exe.cution of another person. So he let the case d.|e a natural d.e.a.t.h and many people never heard of Malaika Agba again. Kola Olawuyi later dai and his very resourceful investigative journalism platform faded away. But my interest in the case never waned at any point as I always

36kinniun media👑 🦁 🕊

41,857 次观看 • 7 个月前

‡ The Dishonest Disruptor Confirms My Points Mike Repole Stable belatedly responded to this recent post of mine: As is typically the case, he failed to respond to any of the clearly articulated, fact-based criticisms that I provided, which serves as clear confirmation of one of the chief criticisms that I described in the post, namely that he has been, at least in our exchanges, consistently unwilling, or unable to admit having made mistakes. He also continued to display exactly the type of dishonesty that I have repeatedly argued reflects poorly on him, and degrades his efforts to affect change in the industry. The ad hominems – his stock and trade when he is unable to argue the substance of an issue – are par for the course. But this warrants a specific mention: "There’s real vision. Real strategy. Real solutions. "I’m sorry I didn’t run them by you first. "Maybe go back and watch the podcast we did together, the one where I laid out actual answers to fix this industry and you sat there stunned." Hmmm...does the combination of vitriol, childish insults, and the vague threats of lawsuits, constitute a "real" strategy? If he were to actually succeed in blowing up the organizations that he has been targeting, what would come next? Has he ever explained publicly how he imagines them to be replaced? And the podcast reference? Well, that's a doozy, and it's not the first or second time that Mike has dishonestly asserted, or implied that I never offer solutions. I've embedded a clip from the podcast to which he refers. Note that I provided a couple of minutes worth of ideas for solutions to various industry problems, some of which are uncommon, and have never been among those floated by Mike. And remember, he accused me (above) of sitting in stunned silence, while he laid out solutions! 😂 (An amusing pedantic note: he attempted to correct me when I mentioned that there are four identical Grade I Derby preps that are run within the span of one week, by interjecting that there are "only three". He was wrong: Arkansas Derby, Florida Derby, Bluegrass, SA Derby) *** To his credit, Mike occasionally shows the ability to be self-deprecating in public. Numerous times he has said "Am I an a**hole? Yes.", as a way of owning up to his, at times, abrasive personality. My suggestion is that he should update that line in order to more accurately reflect his weaknesses: Am I an a**hole, who has difficulty admitting mistakes, and tends to be dishonest when I am unable to argue the substance of serious criticism? Yes. As a final note, some apparently have the impression that Mike and i somehow are on different sides. That is false, as we agree on many of the broad strokes of major issues, including the industry's need for radical reform. I have also spoken publicly on problems in the industry for decades. My criticisms of Mike (and others) are not, in essence, a "defense" of the organizations that he attacks, but rather a reminder that the facts, and honest argumentation, matter.
2:56

‡ The Dishonest Disruptor Confirms My Points Mike Repole Stable belatedly responded to this recent post of mine: As is typically the case, he failed to respond to any of the clearly articulated, fact-based criticisms that I provided, which serves as clear confirmation of one of the chief criticisms that I described in the post, namely that he has been, at least in our exchanges, consistently unwilling, or unable to admit having made mistakes. He also continued to display exactly the type of dishonesty that I have repeatedly argued reflects poorly on him, and degrades his efforts to affect change in the industry. The ad hominems – his stock and trade when he is unable to argue the substance of an issue – are par for the course. But this warrants a specific mention: "There’s real vision. Real strategy. Real solutions. "I’m sorry I didn’t run them by you first. "Maybe go back and watch the podcast we did together, the one where I laid out actual answers to fix this industry and you sat there stunned." Hmmm...does the combination of vitriol, childish insults, and the vague threats of lawsuits, constitute a "real" strategy? If he were to actually succeed in blowing up the organizations that he has been targeting, what would come next? Has he ever explained publicly how he imagines them to be replaced? And the podcast reference? Well, that's a doozy, and it's not the first or second time that Mike has dishonestly asserted, or implied that I never offer solutions. I've embedded a clip from the podcast to which he refers. Note that I provided a couple of minutes worth of ideas for solutions to various industry problems, some of which are uncommon, and have never been among those floated by Mike. And remember, he accused me (above) of sitting in stunned silence, while he laid out solutions! 😂 (An amusing pedantic note: he attempted to correct me when I mentioned that there are four identical Grade I Derby preps that are run within the span of one week, by interjecting that there are "only three". He was wrong: Arkansas Derby, Florida Derby, Bluegrass, SA Derby) *** To his credit, Mike occasionally shows the ability to be self-deprecating in public. Numerous times he has said "Am I an a**hole? Yes.", as a way of owning up to his, at times, abrasive personality. My suggestion is that he should update that line in order to more accurately reflect his weaknesses: Am I an a**hole, who has difficulty admitting mistakes, and tends to be dishonest when I am unable to argue the substance of serious criticism? Yes. As a final note, some apparently have the impression that Mike and i somehow are on different sides. That is false, as we agree on many of the broad strokes of major issues, including the industry's need for radical reform. I have also spoken publicly on problems in the industry for decades. My criticisms of Mike (and others) are not, in essence, a "defense" of the organizations that he attacks, but rather a reminder that the facts, and honest argumentation, matter.

Tinky

14,648 次观看 • 5 个月前

Disruptive teens turn a day at the beach into cuffs in a cop car. We are at Euclid Beach Park in Cleveland, Ohio. A group of three teens were harassing the life guards in a scene that started with the male from the group harassing one of the female life guards. When the female life guard walked away and went into the guard shack, the three teens continued to where one threw a shoe at the life guard supervisor. ​When Cleveland Police officers rolled up onto the sand, things went from zero to sixty immediately. The responding officer noted that as he approached, he witnessed the suspect in the black hoodie throw the shoe at the lifeguard. ​When the officer ordered her to put her hands behind her back, she and her companions instantly resisted. The officer had to unholster his taser to gain compliance, eventually wrestling the woman in the black hoodie to the ground to detain her. As the primary arrest was happening, the other two teens repeatedly stepped into the officer's space and ignored orders to back away. ​The girl in the white shirt was warned multiple times she’d be arrested for obstruction. Once both women were seated they repeatedly refused to provide their names or Social Security numbers, adding a "failure to identify" to their growing list of problems. As the officer was walking the first suspect back to the cruiser she continued to resist struggle as you can hear the arresting officer yelling, "You spit in my face!" and "She kicked me and spit in my face!" While the suspect denied it, the allegation took a bad situation and made it exponentially worse. The individuals involved were taken into custody and slapped with a laundry list of serious charges, including: ​Assault on a Lifeguard (for the shoe throw) ​Assault on a Peace Officer (for the alleged kicking and spitting) ​Obstruction of Official Business ​Resisting Arrest ​Failure to Identify ​The ever growing desire to make a scene is what dragged these teens into this situation, and it is very clear that this is how they were raised to behave.
7:42

Disruptive teens turn a day at the beach into cuffs in a cop car. We are at Euclid Beach Park in Cleveland, Ohio. A group of three teens were harassing the life guards in a scene that started with the male from the group harassing one of the female life guards. When the female life guard walked away and went into the guard shack, the three teens continued to where one threw a shoe at the life guard supervisor. ​When Cleveland Police officers rolled up onto the sand, things went from zero to sixty immediately. The responding officer noted that as he approached, he witnessed the suspect in the black hoodie throw the shoe at the lifeguard. ​When the officer ordered her to put her hands behind her back, she and her companions instantly resisted. The officer had to unholster his taser to gain compliance, eventually wrestling the woman in the black hoodie to the ground to detain her. As the primary arrest was happening, the other two teens repeatedly stepped into the officer's space and ignored orders to back away. ​The girl in the white shirt was warned multiple times she’d be arrested for obstruction. Once both women were seated they repeatedly refused to provide their names or Social Security numbers, adding a "failure to identify" to their growing list of problems. As the officer was walking the first suspect back to the cruiser she continued to resist struggle as you can hear the arresting officer yelling, "You spit in my face!" and "She kicked me and spit in my face!" While the suspect denied it, the allegation took a bad situation and made it exponentially worse. The individuals involved were taken into custody and slapped with a laundry list of serious charges, including: ​Assault on a Lifeguard (for the shoe throw) ​Assault on a Peace Officer (for the alleged kicking and spitting) ​Obstruction of Official Business ​Resisting Arrest ​Failure to Identify ​The ever growing desire to make a scene is what dragged these teens into this situation, and it is very clear that this is how they were raised to behave.

Giggling Ganon

71,794 次观看 • 2 个月前

This spring my 80lb golden doodle got into a coyote den in the green space right in Bismarck here. We were walking in the green space near my house right at sun down…and as always, I let him run loose to chase pheasants and grouse. I lost track of him for awhile and then I heard a bunch of barking…and since we always see yotes out there trying to lure him in, I knew exactly what was happening… I could hear the barking turn more into fighting yip and yelp noises off in the distance while I was running around trying to find them. I’d have to stop running to be able listen and make sure I was headed in the right direction. Finally, when I got farther down the hill closer to all the noises, my dog Kirby popped out of the tall grass about 200 yards away with three of yotes chasing him and nipping at his heels. I’m guessing he heard me yelling and tried to run toward me, but because they were biting at him he stopped and turned to face all three. He pinned down one that bull rushed him and then he bit and tossed another over his shoulder that also bull rushed him, but right at that moment the biggest one bit his back leg and Kirby let out a big yelp. He spun around and bit that one which backed up and they squared up as the other two tried to regroup. The one Kirby bit and tossed stayed lying down, so I’m assuming it was injured. Kirby’s bit spot was right on the top middle of its spine and it also landed square on its neck/head. That was the only part of the fighting I actually saw as I was sprinting down the last stretch of the hill toward them, so maybe 45 seconds of it. I arrived right when he was squaring off with the biggest one. Right as I got there the yotes backed off a little, but surprisingly not much. Then two more showed up as I was leashing him. So now five of them were circled around us, backing off only a little bit when I yelled and kicked at them. Acting kind of like little mini ugly wolves. As we jogged out, they kept sneaking up behind us and from the sides trying to get at Kirby still. And Kirby was still in a “let me at em” mode which made the jog out difficult lol. After about 1/2 a mile of that, we finally got near the end of the green space and near the street and street lights. So the yotes finally dropped back about 50 yards, and slowed down. That’s when I took this video. But they still followed us into the neighborhood and through the park to my front step, just watching us. Some or all of them may or may not be alive anymore. Tamed city yotes don’t act the same as normal yotes so they’re better off dead for everyone’s sake.
0:22

This spring my 80lb golden doodle got into a coyote den in the green space right in Bismarck here. We were walking in the green space near my house right at sun down…and as always, I let him run loose to chase pheasants and grouse. I lost track of him for awhile and then I heard a bunch of barking…and since we always see yotes out there trying to lure him in, I knew exactly what was happening… I could hear the barking turn more into fighting yip and yelp noises off in the distance while I was running around trying to find them. I’d have to stop running to be able listen and make sure I was headed in the right direction. Finally, when I got farther down the hill closer to all the noises, my dog Kirby popped out of the tall grass about 200 yards away with three of yotes chasing him and nipping at his heels. I’m guessing he heard me yelling and tried to run toward me, but because they were biting at him he stopped and turned to face all three. He pinned down one that bull rushed him and then he bit and tossed another over his shoulder that also bull rushed him, but right at that moment the biggest one bit his back leg and Kirby let out a big yelp. He spun around and bit that one which backed up and they squared up as the other two tried to regroup. The one Kirby bit and tossed stayed lying down, so I’m assuming it was injured. Kirby’s bit spot was right on the top middle of its spine and it also landed square on its neck/head. That was the only part of the fighting I actually saw as I was sprinting down the last stretch of the hill toward them, so maybe 45 seconds of it. I arrived right when he was squaring off with the biggest one. Right as I got there the yotes backed off a little, but surprisingly not much. Then two more showed up as I was leashing him. So now five of them were circled around us, backing off only a little bit when I yelled and kicked at them. Acting kind of like little mini ugly wolves. As we jogged out, they kept sneaking up behind us and from the sides trying to get at Kirby still. And Kirby was still in a “let me at em” mode which made the jog out difficult lol. After about 1/2 a mile of that, we finally got near the end of the green space and near the street and street lights. So the yotes finally dropped back about 50 yards, and slowed down. That’s when I took this video. But they still followed us into the neighborhood and through the park to my front step, just watching us. Some or all of them may or may not be alive anymore. Tamed city yotes don’t act the same as normal yotes so they’re better off dead for everyone’s sake.

KC NoDak Brim 🇺🇸

82,686 次观看 • 1 个月前