Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

🚨🇺🇸 “THE AMERICAN 2025 NATIONAL SECURITY STRATEGY LOOKS DIFFERENT - BUT IT’S STILL NICE WORDS ON PAPER” Former CIA Intel Analyst Larry Johnson says the new 2025 national security strategy might sound like a big shift, but he thinks these documents are mostly nice language, not real instructions that... actually run U.S. policy. He argues most people couldn’t even tell you what the last strategies said under Biden, Trump, or Obama, and he contrasts that with China, where planning documents function like real blueprints with accountability. "There's no denying that there is a change in attitude reflected in what was published for the 2025 national security strategy. However, I challenge anybody in the entire universe, go back and tell me what the national security strategy was under Biden that was released in 2023. Tell me what it was under Trump, which was released, I believe, in 2017. What was it under Obama? What I'm illustrating is these documents are produced. They're nice words on paper, but they are not blueprints. This is not like China. When China puts together a 5-year plan, by God they do a 5-year plan. They hold people accountable: we're going to do this, and we're going to do this, and this is what we want. Yeah, it's supposedly a guideline of what they're going to do, but I always like to see: what are they actually going to do?" Larry Johnsonshow more

Mario Nawfal

2,705,675 subscribers

16,430 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Образование Наука и технологии

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST LAID IT STRAIGHT when asked why China launched a cyberattack on us He knows something we don't! Q: We just heard from the FBI recently that there was a major cyber attack attributed to China. TRUMP: "We do it to them. They do it to us." Q: Well, what was the last time we did a cyber attack in China? TRUMP: "I'm not going to tell you that, but we do them. They do us. It's been like that for a long time." Q: So it's not going to be addressed? TRUMP: "I'll address things, but you know, it is what it is. Look, China's China, they're never easy, but we're doing great with China. I'm the toughest person in China, anywhere in the world. I put on 100 percent tariff on Chinese cars."

🚨 PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST LAID IT STRAIGHT when asked why China launched a cyberattack on us He knows something we don't! Q: We just heard from the FBI recently that there was a major cyber attack attributed to China. TRUMP: "We do it to them. They do it to us." Q: Well, what was the last time we did a cyber attack in China? TRUMP: "I'm not going to tell you that, but we do them. They do us. It's been like that for a long time." Q: So it's not going to be addressed? TRUMP: "I'll address things, but you know, it is what it is. Look, China's China, they're never easy, but we're doing great with China. I'm the toughest person in China, anywhere in the world. I put on 100 percent tariff on Chinese cars."

Eric Daugherty

1,416,007 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

BARTIROMO: How is it possible that Democrats are winning the messaging argument on affordability? BESSENT: A lot of it is the mainstream media. What we in this administration are not going to do is what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know what they're feeling.

BARTIROMO: How is it possible that Democrats are winning the messaging argument on affordability? BESSENT: A lot of it is the mainstream media. What we in this administration are not going to do is what the Biden administration did and tell the American people they don't know what they're feeling.

Aaron Rupar

90,756 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

TRUMP’S MADMAN STRATEGY FOR IRAN: "However, we are going to, at this stage, reference you to the...National Security Archives...from the United States of America. What we believe is what's going on here is this is, as we've said there in our post, you can see it on your screens, in our reaction to President Trump's Truth Social, we've said. 'This is the Madman Strategy'. Now, some may be confused there. We're not actually calling President Trump mad. In fact, the chapter in the Radical Dispatch, within which the written version of this stream, that is, within which this will all be explained, will be called the 'Mad King Trump'. But we're not literally calling Trump mad. What we are referencing here, both by using the phrase the 'Mad King' and the Madman Strategy, is a well-established Kissinger-era national security doctrine, as you can see here from the website, the National Security Archive. There's an article there that's headlined 'Nixon, Kissinger and the Madman Strategy During the Vietnam War'. Now, what is that strategy? Well, we're going to read it for you now, just to clarify exactly what we believe President Trump is doing here. And obviously, when you understand this, you'll understand why that Mike Tyson clip in the context of intimidating the enemy was relevant as well. This is well-established military doctrine from the National Security Archive. Just reading there posted...29th of May, 2015, 'President Richard Nixon, and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, believed they could compel the other side to back down during crises in the Middle East and Vietnam by pushing so many chips into the pot that Nixon would seem crazy enough to go much further. According to newly declassified documents published today...in May 2015, in newly declassified documents published today by the National Security Archive, with madman diplomacy Nixon and Kissinger strove to end the Vietnam War on the most favourable terms possible in the shortest period of time practicable. An effort that culminated in a secret global nuclear alert in October of that year.' So this is on the National Security Archive published in 2015. It's an explanation of what the madman strategy is in military terms. And it's that strategy that we believe President Trump, let's dub him the Mad King, is deploying..." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED.

TRUMP’S MADMAN STRATEGY FOR IRAN: "However, we are going to, at this stage, reference you to the...National Security Archives...from the United States of America. What we believe is what's going on here is this is, as we've said there in our post, you can see it on your screens, in our reaction to President Trump's Truth Social, we've said. 'This is the Madman Strategy'. Now, some may be confused there. We're not actually calling President Trump mad. In fact, the chapter in the Radical Dispatch, within which the written version of this stream, that is, within which this will all be explained, will be called the 'Mad King Trump'. But we're not literally calling Trump mad. What we are referencing here, both by using the phrase the 'Mad King' and the Madman Strategy, is a well-established Kissinger-era national security doctrine, as you can see here from the website, the National Security Archive. There's an article there that's headlined 'Nixon, Kissinger and the Madman Strategy During the Vietnam War'. Now, what is that strategy? Well, we're going to read it for you now, just to clarify exactly what we believe President Trump is doing here. And obviously, when you understand this, you'll understand why that Mike Tyson clip in the context of intimidating the enemy was relevant as well. This is well-established military doctrine from the National Security Archive. Just reading there posted...29th of May, 2015, 'President Richard Nixon, and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, believed they could compel the other side to back down during crises in the Middle East and Vietnam by pushing so many chips into the pot that Nixon would seem crazy enough to go much further. According to newly declassified documents published today...in May 2015, in newly declassified documents published today by the National Security Archive, with madman diplomacy Nixon and Kissinger strove to end the Vietnam War on the most favourable terms possible in the shortest period of time practicable. An effort that culminated in a secret global nuclear alert in October of that year.' So this is on the National Security Archive published in 2015. It's an explanation of what the madman strategy is in military terms. And it's that strategy that we believe President Trump, let's dub him the Mad King, is deploying..." Maajid Nawaz for WARRIOR CREED.

أبو عمّار

36,311 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Are Roman Reigns and CM Punk going too inside? Bryan: "When this was over, all I can say is I was not more interested in the match." Dave: "I was. It's all a combination of storyline but you also want to get lines in there where you have people going 'oh they're shooting'... now they're not but that's the goal. Some people don't like that but in big grudge matches historically that is what you would do."

Are Roman Reigns and CM Punk going too inside? Bryan: "When this was over, all I can say is I was not more interested in the match." Dave: "I was. It's all a combination of storyline but you also want to get lines in there where you have people going 'oh they're shooting'... now they're not but that's the goal. Some people don't like that but in big grudge matches historically that is what you would do."

Wrestling Observer

16,015 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton tells me official FBI documents reveal that Thomas Matthew Crooks got into a confrontation with Trump supporters right before he tried to assassinate the President: "He climbs up on the roof [after that] and evidently, there was no security anywhere that paid attention to that or noticed it. There's some evidence that there was talk of a potential bomb device attached to a car linked to him. I don't know the detail of that. This is the sort of thing that's like, well, tell us. Give us the documents. And the documents are what they are. If we're misinterpreting them because of something you hid from us, unhide it and we'll fix the record, which is what we're trying to do."

Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton tells me official FBI documents reveal that Thomas Matthew Crooks got into a confrontation with Trump supporters right before he tried to assassinate the President: "He climbs up on the roof [after that] and evidently, there was no security anywhere that paid attention to that or noticed it. There's some evidence that there was talk of a potential bomb device attached to a car linked to him. I don't know the detail of that. This is the sort of thing that's like, well, tell us. Give us the documents. And the documents are what they are. If we're misinterpreting them because of something you hid from us, unhide it and we'll fix the record, which is what we're trying to do."

Glenn Beck

153,433 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

I invest in a lot of entrepreneurs that I don't like but I respect. I respect them and the only thing I care about is executional skills. The ability to say, "All right this is what I'm going to achieve this month" and then execute on it. When they hit their bumps which they all do, because whatever their plan was is not going to work, they have the ability to pivot. That what I look for.

I invest in a lot of entrepreneurs that I don't like but I respect. I respect them and the only thing I care about is executional skills. The ability to say, "All right this is what I'm going to achieve this month" and then execute on it. When they hit their bumps which they all do, because whatever their plan was is not going to work, they have the ability to pivot. That what I look for.

Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful

31,216 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨NEW: Caller *CLASHES* with Charlamagne over Trump's second term success so far🚨 CALLER: "I feel like this is one of the first presidents that's actually doing what they said they was going to do." "He doing everything he said he was going to do ... I feel like it's right for the country." CHARLAMAGNE: "Well, no. Not necessarily. Because he said on day one he was gon' bring the price of groceries down ... clearly people aren't feeling that relief yet in their pockets." CALLER: "Everybody know in your right mind there's no way somebody could do something instantly." "But in terms of what has happened within this year, it's crazy!" "It's no way that you could see the last four years and how garbage it was — and then look at just this first half of the year and think stuff is not going in a positive direction." Daily Caller

🚨NEW: Caller CLASHES with Charlamagne over Trump's second term success so far🚨 CALLER: "I feel like this is one of the first presidents that's actually doing what they said they was going to do." "He doing everything he said he was going to do ... I feel like it's right for the country." CHARLAMAGNE: "Well, no. Not necessarily. Because he said on day one he was gon' bring the price of groceries down ... clearly people aren't feeling that relief yet in their pockets." CALLER: "Everybody know in your right mind there's no way somebody could do something instantly." "But in terms of what has happened within this year, it's crazy!" "It's no way that you could see the last four years and how garbage it was — and then look at just this first half of the year and think stuff is not going in a positive direction." Daily Caller

Jason Cohen 🇺🇸

572,722 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trump seems intent on building a “tripolar world” between the US, Russia and China, former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken told journalist Fareed Zakaria. Fareed Zakaria: So, I know you're going to tell me that you don't like what's been happening under the Trump administration, but tell me, of all the things that have happened this year, what is the thing that you think is likely to leave the most lasting effect? What is the thing that you think will reverberate? Antony Blinken: I think we've got two challenges with the administration's approach. One is the one that you just talked about—it's in the National Security Strategy and it reflects the worldview that they're bringing to what they're doing. Fareed, I worked on National Security Strategy during the Clinton administration, during the Obama administration, during the Biden administration. We used to joke that rarely have so many worked so long on a document to be read by so few. This is maybe the one exception, and it's gotten a lot of attention. But this worldview that takes us away from what had been the animating principles of our foreign policy for 80 years—with lots of mistakes along the way, but a basic foundational premise—that enlightened self-interest was the way to go, that the success and strength of other countries could be our own and that the investments we made in that would redound positively to us. New markets for everything we wanted to sell, new partners to deal with all sorts of global challenges that no one country can deal with alone, new allies to deter aggression. We've moved away from that, and this tripolar world that the administration seems intent on establishing—the United States, Russia, China with spheres of influence—I understand the motivation for it, but I worry very much where it leads. Because you're a student of history, so am I. We know in this 19th-century view of the world—where great powers get to do what they want and everyone else has to suffer what they must—it is not a recipe for stability. It's not a recipe for peace. The big powers in their spheres inevitably want more, and the elbows get sharp, and then they're keeping down people in their own countries or people in countries within their sphere. People rebel against that, they push them down again, conflict inevitably boils over. 1/2

Trump seems intent on building a “tripolar world” between the US, Russia and China, former Secretary of State Anthony Blinken told journalist Fareed Zakaria. Fareed Zakaria: So, I know you're going to tell me that you don't like what's been happening under the Trump administration, but tell me, of all the things that have happened this year, what is the thing that you think is likely to leave the most lasting effect? What is the thing that you think will reverberate? Antony Blinken: I think we've got two challenges with the administration's approach. One is the one that you just talked about—it's in the National Security Strategy and it reflects the worldview that they're bringing to what they're doing. Fareed, I worked on National Security Strategy during the Clinton administration, during the Obama administration, during the Biden administration. We used to joke that rarely have so many worked so long on a document to be read by so few. This is maybe the one exception, and it's gotten a lot of attention. But this worldview that takes us away from what had been the animating principles of our foreign policy for 80 years—with lots of mistakes along the way, but a basic foundational premise—that enlightened self-interest was the way to go, that the success and strength of other countries could be our own and that the investments we made in that would redound positively to us. New markets for everything we wanted to sell, new partners to deal with all sorts of global challenges that no one country can deal with alone, new allies to deter aggression. We've moved away from that, and this tripolar world that the administration seems intent on establishing—the United States, Russia, China with spheres of influence—I understand the motivation for it, but I worry very much where it leads. Because you're a student of history, so am I. We know in this 19th-century view of the world—where great powers get to do what they want and everyone else has to suffer what they must—it is not a recipe for stability. It's not a recipe for peace. The big powers in their spheres inevitably want more, and the elbows get sharp, and then they're keeping down people in their own countries or people in countries within their sphere. People rebel against that, they push them down again, conflict inevitably boils over. 1/2

Yasmina

85,114 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

James Jones doesn’t believe the 49ers will win 9 games in 2025: “It’s not happening for the Niners this year. The Niners fans be on me saying I’m a hater and you know what, I’m done with that. They are going under. I think they are going to be, I wouldn’t say a bad football team, because I respect Kyle Shanahan and what they do, but I don’t see how they get to 9 [wins].” 🎥: @TheFacilityFS1

James Jones doesn’t believe the 49ers will win 9 games in 2025: “It’s not happening for the Niners this year. The Niners fans be on me saying I’m a hater and you know what, I’m done with that. They are going under. I think they are going to be, I wouldn’t say a bad football team, because I respect Kyle Shanahan and what they do, but I don’t see how they get to 9 [wins].” 🎥: @TheFacilityFS1

Coach Yac 🗣

83,853 просмотров • 1 год назад

Joe Giglio is devasted in what could've been the Phillies' last chance with this core: "I'm dejected. I'm sad. And I do feel like this was the end. Not that the franchise is done and they can't retool. {...} But I just feel like this group's run is never going to be the same. They're not a young team and every era has these teams where it's like they're good enough to win a championship, but they don't. And it kind of hit me as they walked off the field last night. I feel like we got one of those teams."

Joe Giglio is devasted in what could've been the Phillies' last chance with this core: "I'm dejected. I'm sad. And I do feel like this was the end. Not that the franchise is done and they can't retool. {...} But I just feel like this group's run is never going to be the same. They're not a young team and every era has these teams where it's like they're good enough to win a championship, but they don't. And it kind of hit me as they walked off the field last night. I feel like we got one of those teams."

SPORTSRADIO 94WIP

36,263 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

HILARIOUS 🚨: Reporter: “Iranian government threatened a bunch of U.S. companies in the region today.” President Trump: “With what? What did they threaten them with? BB guns or? They don't have much left to threaten.” Reporter: “My question for you is—” President Trump: “You made a statement. What did they threaten them with? I don't know. Tell me. How did they threaten them?” Reporter: “All I know is that they threatened them, sir.” President Trump: “What does that mean?” Reporter: “Fair enough.” President Trump: “They said something nasty?” Reporter: “Are you helping to back stop them?” President “Trump: You don't even know what the threat was. What was the threat? I haven't heard it. What was the threat? Did they say they're going to blow them up? You know what they're not going to do? They're not going to hit them with a nuclear weapon.”

HILARIOUS 🚨: Reporter: “Iranian government threatened a bunch of U.S. companies in the region today.” President Trump: “With what? What did they threaten them with? BB guns or? They don't have much left to threaten.” Reporter: “My question for you is—” President Trump: “You made a statement. What did they threaten them with? I don't know. Tell me. How did they threaten them?” Reporter: “All I know is that they threatened them, sir.” President Trump: “What does that mean?” Reporter: “Fair enough.” President Trump: “They said something nasty?” Reporter: “Are you helping to back stop them?” President “Trump: You don't even know what the threat was. What was the threat? I haven't heard it. What was the threat? Did they say they're going to blow them up? You know what they're not going to do? They're not going to hit them with a nuclear weapon.”

Dr Charlie Ward

1,689,966 просмотров • 21 дней назад

🚨🇺🇸ELON: THE 'WHAT DID YOU DO LAST WEEK EMAIL' WAS TO FIND OUT IF THESE FEDERAL WORKERS ARE ALIVE AND REAL “I think that email perhaps was misinterpreted as a performance review, but, actually, it was a pulse check review. Do you have a pulse? Do you have a pulse and 2 neurons? But what we are trying to get to the bottom of is we think there are a number of people on the government payroll who are dead, which is probably why they can't respond. And some people who are not real people, like, they're literally individuals that are collecting paychecks on a fictional individual.” Source: Florida's Voice News

🚨🇺🇸ELON: THE 'WHAT DID YOU DO LAST WEEK EMAIL' WAS TO FIND OUT IF THESE FEDERAL WORKERS ARE ALIVE AND REAL “I think that email perhaps was misinterpreted as a performance review, but, actually, it was a pulse check review. Do you have a pulse? Do you have a pulse and 2 neurons? But what we are trying to get to the bottom of is we think there are a number of people on the government payroll who are dead, which is probably why they can't respond. And some people who are not real people, like, they're literally individuals that are collecting paychecks on a fictional individual.” Source: Florida's Voice News

Mario Nawfal

2,103,699 просмотров • 1 год назад

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Logan Paul says he spent $562,000 on a Michael Jordan signed court, discovered it wasn’t what he was told, and thinks he’s uncovered something shady that could rattle the sports memorabilia market “I bought an 8 foot by 8 foot piece of Chicago Bulls floor court that was supposedly used during the second three, Last Dance, signed by Michael Jordan” “Turns out it is not what they say it is, and they will say it is what they say it is, it is objectively not what they say it is. So the only way for me to not move forward and have to pay $562,000, because they were making me do it by this certain date, was to file an injunction, which made SportsCenter news. It’s like, hold on a second, let me inspect this item and verify its authenticity first. And I tried so hard to verify that this thing was what they said it was, and that it was used during the years of 1994 to either 98 or 99. I could not do it. It didn’t check out” “As this house of cards was falling down, I discovered that this is just the tip of the iceberg in items that have been authenticated and actually don’t have the proof that they are what they say they are.” “I believe I’m sitting on a story that is going to rattle the sports market to the core. There’s been some just shady fucked up shit that’s happened, and it appears that one company in particular said things were used or are things that they actually are not. That is my opinion”

Third

53,682 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Jasmine Crockett backpedals on her statement from last year calling Latinos who voted for Trump 'slaves'. Jake Tapper: "Now, about the time that was published last year, around 1 million Latino voters in Texas were voting for Trump. Do they all have slave mentality?" Crockett: "No, and that's not what that said at all. To be clear, I did not say that every Latino has that type of mentality. I don't believe that the people that voted for Trump believe in what they're actually getting. That is number one. What Trump said is that he was going to kick out the bad guys. And that's what I was talking about."

Jasmine Crockett backpedals on her statement from last year calling Latinos who voted for Trump 'slaves'. Jake Tapper: "Now, about the time that was published last year, around 1 million Latino voters in Texas were voting for Trump. Do they all have slave mentality?" Crockett: "No, and that's not what that said at all. To be clear, I did not say that every Latino has that type of mentality. I don't believe that the people that voted for Trump believe in what they're actually getting. That is number one. What Trump said is that he was going to kick out the bad guys. And that's what I was talking about."

DeVory Darkins

226,121 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

"Promises made, promises kept." "Trump said he was going to secure the border, he did that." "Trump said he was going to put tariffs in place to generate revenue for America, he did that." "Trump said he was going to get gas prices lower, he did that." "I like people who do what they say they are going to do." Integrity and reliability!

"Promises made, promises kept." "Trump said he was going to secure the border, he did that." "Trump said he was going to put tariffs in place to generate revenue for America, he did that." "Trump said he was going to get gas prices lower, he did that." "I like people who do what they say they are going to do." Integrity and reliability!

AmericanPapaBear™

46,770 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

rosé: I’m not joking but there were so many people online who would tell me what to do with the way i put my makeup on the way I was dressed in stage they would like harass my hair and makeup team online. those people are people i love and that work with me and that’s part of my team and those are my best friends too. but I’ve felt the ache where when people on online I feel like they know what they’re doing they’re really mean to them and that like affects me and they be like do this to your hair, do that to your hair, why are you not doing this and that.

rosé: I’m not joking but there were so many people online who would tell me what to do with the way i put my makeup on the way I was dressed in stage they would like harass my hair and makeup team online. those people are people i love and that work with me and that’s part of my team and those are my best friends too. but I’ve felt the ache where when people on online I feel like they know what they’re doing they’re really mean to them and that like affects me and they be like do this to your hair, do that to your hair, why are you not doing this and that.

rosé pics

45,748 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

HILARIOUS: Reporter: “Iranian government threatened a bunch of U.S. companies in the region today.” President Trump: “With what? What did they threaten them with? BB guns or? They don't have much left to threaten.” Reporter: “My question for you is—” President Trump: “You made a statement. What did they threaten them with? I don't know. Tell me. How did they threaten them?” Reporter: “All I know is that they threatened them, sir.” President Trump: “What does that mean?” Reporter: “Fair enough.” President Trump: “They said something nasty?” Reporter: “Are you helping to back stop them?” President “Trump: You don't even know what the threat was. What was the threat? I haven't heard it. What was the threat? Did they say they're going to blow them up? You know what they're not going to do? They're not going to hit them with a nuclear weapon.”

HILARIOUS: Reporter: “Iranian government threatened a bunch of U.S. companies in the region today.” President Trump: “With what? What did they threaten them with? BB guns or? They don't have much left to threaten.” Reporter: “My question for you is—” President Trump: “You made a statement. What did they threaten them with? I don't know. Tell me. How did they threaten them?” Reporter: “All I know is that they threatened them, sir.” President Trump: “What does that mean?” Reporter: “Fair enough.” President Trump: “They said something nasty?” Reporter: “Are you helping to back stop them?” President “Trump: You don't even know what the threat was. What was the threat? I haven't heard it. What was the threat? Did they say they're going to blow them up? You know what they're not going to do? They're not going to hit them with a nuclear weapon.”

RedWave Press

3,964,260 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад