the Barcelona that Ronaldo faced

The killeures that posted

Plus the funny thing is look at the point difference in those laliga titles,it's crazy that even with all the decisions against us we were still able to be right behind them and even won 2 in that time.

⚖️ The Negreira Case – Full Summary FC BARCELONA ARE THE MOST CORRUPTED CLUB IN THE WORLD 📌 What Is the Negreira Case? The Negreira Case refers to FC Barcelona’s payments over 17 years (2001–2018) to José María Enríquez Negreira, former vice president of the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA) in Spain. This body oversaw referee appointments and performance evaluations in Spanish football. Barça paid over €7.3 million to Negreira’s company, Dasnil 95 SL, reportedly for technical reports on referees. 🧾 Timeline of Events 2001–2018: FC Barcelona made repeated payments to Negreira’s companies. Negreira was an active vice president of the CTA during this time. 2019: Payments stopped after Negreira left his position. 2022–2023: Spanish tax authorities investigated Dasnil 95. Irregularities led to uncovering FC Barcelona's payments. February 2023: Spanish media reported the payments publicly. Prosecution was opened for possible corruption and sports fraud. March 2023: Barcelona, former presidents (Bartomeu, Rosell), and Negreira were charged with: Corruption in sport Unfair administration Falsification of documents 2023–2024: UEFA opened an investigation. The Spanish court accepted the case for review. Evidence showed payments but no proof of direct influence on match results. May 2024: The Barcelona Court dropped the bribery charge, stating Negreira was not a public official, which is required for bribery under Spanish law. The rest of the charges (corruption, document falsification, etc.) are still under investigation. 🧠 What Did Barcelona Say? Barcelona admitted to making the payments. Claimed they were for technical reports on referees to help the coaching staff. Said the reports were delivered verbally or in writing (no consistent proof has been found yet). Denied any attempt to influence referees or match outcomes. ✅ Confirmed facts: Payments happened — verified by tax records and bank transfers. Negreira was paid while holding a top position in the body that assigns referees in La Liga. 🧑‍⚖️ What Charges Were Made? In 2023, Spanish prosecutors formally charged FC Barcelona (and former presidents Bartomeu and Rosell) with: Bribery Sports corruption Unfair administration Document falsification 🧾 What Evidence Exists? Payments from FC Barcelona to Negreira’s companies are proven by tax records and bank transfers. 🚨 Bottom Line Barcelona is not proven guilty in court yet, but they are not INNOCENT either. They: Made suspicious, confirmed payments. Haven’t justified those payments clearly. Remain under investigation for corruption. ❌ Why Hasn’t FC Barcelona Been Punished? 1. ⚖️ Legal Process Still Ongoing The criminal investigation is not finished. The club and individuals are still under formal investigation. No final verdict = no punishment. 2. 🕒 Statute of Limitations in Sports Law Spanish sports laws only allow punishment within 3 years of the offense. Payments ended in 2018, so sporting authorities (like LaLiga or RFEF) can’t take action now. 🚨 Bribery Charge Dropped (May 2024) A Spanish court dropped the bribery charge because: Negreira wasn’t a public official — a legal requirement for bribery under Spanish law. This was a legal technicality, not a declaration of innocence. ⚠️ Important: This doesn’t mean Barcelona was found innocent — it just means the bribery law didn’t apply in this case. 🕵️ Why Hasn’t Barcelona Been Punished? ⏳ Legal case still ongoing – No final verdict yet. 📜 Sporting statute of limitations – In Spain, sports crimes older than 3 years can’t be punished by LaLiga or the Spanish Football Federation. 🔍 No proof of match-fixing – Without evidence of refereeing influence, authorities hesitate to impose heavy penalties. UEFA is still investigating – They could issue sanctions like banning Barcelona from European competitions, but they’re waiting on the legal case to conclude. ⚖️ Is FC Barcelona Guilty? IssueStatus Payments to Negreira✅ Proven 🧠 Bottom Line: Barcelona is not legally guilty yet, but clearly implicated. Payments were real, but their intent and effect remain unclear. The legal process continues, and criminal or UEFA sanctions are still possible. 🗓️ What Happened in May 2024? In May 2024, a Spanish court made a key ruling in the ongoing case against FC Barcelona. ✅ The court dropped the bribery charge against: FC Barcelona Former presidents (Bartomeu and Rosell) Negreira himself ❓ Why Was the Bribery Charge Dropped? In Spanish law, to charge someone with bribery, the person receiving the money (in this case, Negreira) must be considered a "public official" — someone who holds a position in a government or state-run institution. ⚖️ The court ruled that: Negreira was not a public official, because: The Technical Committee of Referees (CTA), where he worked, is part of the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF), which is a private sports body, not a government institution. 📌 Conclusion: Since Negreira wasn’t a public official, bribery laws don’t apply in this case — so that specific charge had to be dropped. 🧾 What Does It Mean That "Bribery Was Dropped Because Negreira Wasn’t a Public Official"? 🟡 Context: In Spanish criminal law, bribery (cohecho) requires that the person being bribed is a public official — someone who holds a government or public sector position. 👤 Who Is Negreira? José María Enríquez Negreira was the vice president of the Technical Committee of Referees (CTA). The CTA is linked to the Spanish Football Federation (RFEF), which is a private sporting body, not a government entity. ⚖️ What the Court Said: In May 2024, the court ruled that Negreira was not a public official under Spanish law. Therefore, Barcelona legally could not be charged with bribing him, because the crime of bribery doesn’t apply in this context. 🚫 Does This Mean Barcelona Is Innocent? No. The court didn’t say, “Barcelona did nothing wrong.” It only said: “You can’t use the bribery law in this case because the legal definition doesn’t fit.” So: The payment is real ✅ The intent is still unclear ❓ The law used (bribery) didn’t fit, so that charge was dropped ❌ 🧠 Simple Analogy: Imagine someone is accused of "stealing from a bank," but the building they took money from was technically not a bank, but a private office. They might still be guilty of theft — but not under the law called “bank robbery.” That’s what happened here. 🔄 What's Next? The case continues under other charges like: Corruption in sport Falsifying business records Unfair administration These charges do not require Negreira to be a public official, so Barcelona could still face punishment — but the legal process is ongoing. 🔑 Conclusion: Barcelona is not innocent yet. The bribery charge was dropped on a legal technicality (Negreira wasn’t a public official), but other serious charges are still under investigation.

Disgusting rat organization no wonder they it came out they paid refs

The Real Madrid that Messi faced

he won more international titles(10) in real madrid than domestic titles(6), and considering the fact that players get to dispute way less international titles every season compared to domestic titles it is a strange statistic, i wonder why that is...

Waimy

We will never beat them on propaganda

the varane challenge was soo shameless man 😹