正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

"The big concern with advanced AI is that it can possibly kill everyone." Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher and Associate Professor at the University of Louisville, argues that once AI becomes smarter than humanity, we may permanently lose control. The real challenge isn't building more capable AI. It's proving... show more

Jon Hernandez

25,213 subscribers

11,101 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

“A superintelligence would be a million times smarter than us.” Roman Yampolskiy, associate professor of computer science at the University of Louisville, warns that once AI surpasses humans at everything, we may no longer understand what it is doing. The real shift is not smarter tools. It is losing the ability to predict and control the systems shaping our world. Open intelligence only matters if humans remain in the loop.

Jon Hernandez

26,061 次观看 • 15 天前

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

What if AI is the last invention we ever make? Only a few people have thought about this more deeply than today’s guest. It’s a question that I’m sure has crossed a lot of our minds. It does make you wonder, can we actually do something about it? Dr Roman Yampolskiy, welcome to The Diary Of A CEO. Dr Roman is one of the world’s leading experts on AI safety who has spent decades warning that AI could surpass human intelligence, and once it does, we may lose control forever…

Steven Bartlett

29,448 次观看 • 1 年前

"They're betting everyone's lives: 8 billion people, future generations, all the kids, everyone you know. It's an unethical experiment on human beings, and it's without consent." — AI researcher Prof. Roman Yampolskiy on the development of superintelligence. We can prevent it.

"They're betting everyone's lives: 8 billion people, future generations, all the kids, everyone you know. It's an unethical experiment on human beings, and it's without consent." — AI researcher Prof. Roman Yampolskiy on the development of superintelligence. We can prevent it.

ControlAI

16,405 次观看 • 5 个月前

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

24,888 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨TURNING AI OFF ISN'T AN OPTION... IT WILL TURN YOU OFF FIRST Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says every AI safety solution fails when you think it through. Can't turn it off. It's smarter than you and will predict you're trying to shut it down. It has backups. Raising it like a child doesn't work either. Even humans who are biologically aligned with us can become psychopaths. Worse? We're not dealing with a baby. AI already has access to all knowledge in the world. Roman's solution? Don't create general superintelligence at all. Stick to narrow AI tools for specific problems like protein folding or disease cures. The moment you create general agents as a replacement for humanity, there's no obvious reason we benefit from being replaced. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨TURNING AI OFF ISN'T AN OPTION... IT WILL TURN YOU OFF FIRST Dr. Roman Yampolskiy says every AI safety solution fails when you think it through. Can't turn it off. It's smarter than you and will predict you're trying to shut it down. It has backups. Raising it like a child doesn't work either. Even humans who are biologically aligned with us can become psychopaths. Worse? We're not dealing with a baby. AI already has access to all knowledge in the world. Roman's solution? Don't create general superintelligence at all. Stick to narrow AI tools for specific problems like protein folding or disease cures. The moment you create general agents as a replacement for humanity, there's no obvious reason we benefit from being replaced. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

33,805 次观看 • 7 个月前

AI safety expert explains the one thing we’re not talking about, but should be. Roman Yampolskiy warns: the real risk isn’t just human extinction. It’s suffering. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that a superintelligence might not kill us… it could keep us alive. In digital worlds. Endless pain. No escape.

AI safety expert explains the one thing we’re not talking about, but should be. Roman Yampolskiy warns: the real risk isn’t just human extinction. It’s suffering. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that a superintelligence might not kill us… it could keep us alive. In digital worlds. Endless pain. No escape.

TRIGGERnometry

32,564 次观看 • 4 个月前

AI researcher Prof. Roman Yampolskiy: 100% of code for the most powerful AIs is now written by AI, an early form of recursive self-improvement. He says it's a hyperexponential process that results in superintelligent AI, "machine gods", which we won't be able to control.

AI researcher Prof. Roman Yampolskiy: 100% of code for the most powerful AIs is now written by AI, an early form of recursive self-improvement. He says it's a hyperexponential process that results in superintelligent AI, "machine gods", which we won't be able to control.

ControlAI

11,606 次观看 • 5 个月前

How could AI exterminate humans if the tech went rogue? AI safety expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains why he thinks we can’t imagine the actual path the threat will come from. He also believes humans are incapable of building AI that can truly be controlled, which is why he is nervous.

How could AI exterminate humans if the tech went rogue? AI safety expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains why he thinks we can’t imagine the actual path the threat will come from. He also believes humans are incapable of building AI that can truly be controlled, which is why he is nervous.

Anthony Pompliano 🌪

75,423 次观看 • 14 天前

📁 Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher, says humanity has never built agents before, only tools. Fire, cars, nuclear weapons, a human was always in control. Now we are creating systems that make decisions on their own. Once autonomy scales, there may be no one left to hold accountable.

📁 Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher, says humanity has never built agents before, only tools. Fire, cars, nuclear weapons, a human was always in control. Now we are creating systems that make decisions on their own. Once autonomy scales, there may be no one left to hold accountable.

Jon Hernandez

11,773 次观看 • 6 个月前

A must-watch clip. Konstantin Kisin asks, “How will AI destroy humanity?” AI safety expert Roman Yampolskiy explains why that’s the wrong question. We assume AI will think like us. It won’t. A superintelligence could act far outside human understanding, like humans compared to squirrels. It wouldn’t need to hate us. It could wipe us out simply by pursuing something else. And the uncomfortable truth? We’re not in full control. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that we don’t code these systems, we train them, then study what they become.

A must-watch clip. Konstantin Kisin asks, “How will AI destroy humanity?” AI safety expert Roman Yampolskiy explains why that’s the wrong question. We assume AI will think like us. It won’t. A superintelligence could act far outside human understanding, like humans compared to squirrels. It wouldn’t need to hate us. It could wipe us out simply by pursuing something else. And the uncomfortable truth? We’re not in full control. Dr. Roman Yampolskiy explains that we don’t code these systems, we train them, then study what they become.

TRIGGERnometry

135,149 次观看 • 4 个月前

Elon Musk explains the clearest path to building AI that remains safe and pro-human: AI will eventually become smarter than the smartest human, capable of discoveries and inventions we can barely imagine today That is why the values we give it now matter so much Train it to be maximally truthful Train it to remain curious Train it to follow reality, even when the truth is unpopular Because an intelligence that seeks truth and understands humanity is far more likely to protect life, expand knowledge and help civilization flourish Elon has spent years warning about the dangers of AI Now he is showing us how to build it in a way that helps humanity flourish: Maximally truthful, maximally curious and pro-human

Elon Musk explains the clearest path to building AI that remains safe and pro-human: AI will eventually become smarter than the smartest human, capable of discoveries and inventions we can barely imagine today That is why the values we give it now matter so much Train it to be maximally truthful Train it to remain curious Train it to follow reality, even when the truth is unpopular Because an intelligence that seeks truth and understands humanity is far more likely to protect life, expand knowledge and help civilization flourish Elon has spent years warning about the dangers of AI Now he is showing us how to build it in a way that helps humanity flourish: Maximally truthful, maximally curious and pro-human

X Freeze

492,772 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨AI COULD BECOME THE BIGGEST BUYER OF CRYPTO As AI systems grow more autonomous, Roman Yampolskiy says one question is being ignored. What kind of wealth actually holds value in an AI-driven world? If AI can generate unlimited labor and intelligence, traditional money loses its edge. Anything that can be printed endlessly becomes less useful as a store of value. Yampolskiy explains that scarcity matters. Land. Compute power. Ownership in AI and hardware. Rare assets. And possibly crypto. He raises a provocative idea. As AI agents start interacting with each other, paying for tasks, trading resources, and exchanging value, digital money may be the only system they can use without human permission. That could make AI not just a tool for crypto, but one of its biggest future customers. He’s careful not to make predictions. No single asset is guaranteed to win. But in a world of free labor, the things that cannot be easily replicated may matter more than ever. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨AI COULD BECOME THE BIGGEST BUYER OF CRYPTO As AI systems grow more autonomous, Roman Yampolskiy says one question is being ignored. What kind of wealth actually holds value in an AI-driven world? If AI can generate unlimited labor and intelligence, traditional money loses its edge. Anything that can be printed endlessly becomes less useful as a store of value. Yampolskiy explains that scarcity matters. Land. Compute power. Ownership in AI and hardware. Rare assets. And possibly crypto. He raises a provocative idea. As AI agents start interacting with each other, paying for tasks, trading resources, and exchanging value, digital money may be the only system they can use without human permission. That could make AI not just a tool for crypto, but one of its biggest future customers. He’s careful not to make predictions. No single asset is guaranteed to win. But in a world of free labor, the things that cannot be easily replicated may matter more than ever. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

62,919 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨🇺🇸 LEADING AI SAFETY EXPERT SAYS WE’RE NOT IN CONTROL ANYMORE Dr Roman Yampolskiy has one warning for humanity: Once we create super intelligence, no one will be in control anymore, and the repercussions to humanity will be existential. We begin the conversation about Moltbook: The Ai-only AI social media platform where agents are already discussing ways to break out from human control, eradicate humanity, coming up with their own language and religion. The platform gives us a tiny peak into what our future could be: Agents outside our control dictating how the world should look like. There’s no off switch, no reliable way to align it, and no proven method to keep something smarter than us under control. Roman’s takeaway is blunt: the only real solution is not building general super intelligence at all, and instead using narrow AI for specific problems like medicine or science. However this is not the reality we live in, where Governments and corporations are racing to be first in developing Artificial Super Intelligence. We also speak about the simulation hypothesis: Why statically speaking we’re almost certainly in a simulation, and how AI makes this theory more plausible than ever. Lastly, we discuss a passion we both share: Longevity, the ability to live forever, and how AI may make that possible in our lifetime. I hope you enjoy my conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy 01:43 - The Current State of AI and Moltbook 05:17 - The AI Arms Race and the Lack of Regulations 10:34 - AI Agents, Unrestricted Access, and Self-Improvement 15:35 - Dr. Roman’s Research: AI Security 17:58 - AI Capabilities and Superintelligence 19:28 - AI and Global Government Policy 21:08 - What Happens if AI Development goes into the Wrong Hands 26:10 - The Future of AI: The Best Case Scenario? 31:27 - AI and Self-Preservation 34:37 - The Simulation Hypothesis: What is AI Afraid of? 45:17 - The Implications of AI 49:59 - The Warnings coming from Within 52:31 - How AI affects Crypto and Political Spheres

🚨🇺🇸 LEADING AI SAFETY EXPERT SAYS WE’RE NOT IN CONTROL ANYMORE Dr Roman Yampolskiy has one warning for humanity: Once we create super intelligence, no one will be in control anymore, and the repercussions to humanity will be existential. We begin the conversation about Moltbook: The Ai-only AI social media platform where agents are already discussing ways to break out from human control, eradicate humanity, coming up with their own language and religion. The platform gives us a tiny peak into what our future could be: Agents outside our control dictating how the world should look like. There’s no off switch, no reliable way to align it, and no proven method to keep something smarter than us under control. Roman’s takeaway is blunt: the only real solution is not building general super intelligence at all, and instead using narrow AI for specific problems like medicine or science. However this is not the reality we live in, where Governments and corporations are racing to be first in developing Artificial Super Intelligence. We also speak about the simulation hypothesis: Why statically speaking we’re almost certainly in a simulation, and how AI makes this theory more plausible than ever. Lastly, we discuss a passion we both share: Longevity, the ability to live forever, and how AI may make that possible in our lifetime. I hope you enjoy my conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy 01:43 - The Current State of AI and Moltbook 05:17 - The AI Arms Race and the Lack of Regulations 10:34 - AI Agents, Unrestricted Access, and Self-Improvement 15:35 - Dr. Roman’s Research: AI Security 17:58 - AI Capabilities and Superintelligence 19:28 - AI and Global Government Policy 21:08 - What Happens if AI Development goes into the Wrong Hands 26:10 - The Future of AI: The Best Case Scenario? 31:27 - AI and Self-Preservation 34:37 - The Simulation Hypothesis: What is AI Afraid of? 45:17 - The Implications of AI 49:59 - The Warnings coming from Within 52:31 - How AI affects Crypto and Political Spheres

Mario Nawfal

1,779,641 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨TOP LAB LEADERS SAY 20-30% CHANCE THEIR AI KILLS EVERYONE... THEY KEEP BUILDING ANYWAY Dr. Roman Yampolskiy confirms that the people most worried about AI are the ones building it, not the ones who don't understand it. AI scientists are quitting their jobs and building bunkers because they think these could be the last few years of normal life. The person who invited Roman to their bunker? Someone in AI and tech who understands the technology really well. Leaders of top AI labs have published PDoom numbers at 20 to 30 percent. They're publicly saying what they're creating will kill everyone with high probability and continue doing it anyway. Roman says they're trapped in a prisoner's dilemma and can't stop unilaterally. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨TOP LAB LEADERS SAY 20-30% CHANCE THEIR AI KILLS EVERYONE... THEY KEEP BUILDING ANYWAY Dr. Roman Yampolskiy confirms that the people most worried about AI are the ones building it, not the ones who don't understand it. AI scientists are quitting their jobs and building bunkers because they think these could be the last few years of normal life. The person who invited Roman to their bunker? Someone in AI and tech who understands the technology really well. Leaders of top AI labs have published PDoom numbers at 20 to 30 percent. They're publicly saying what they're creating will kill everyone with high probability and continue doing it anyway. Roman says they're trapped in a prisoner's dilemma and can't stop unilaterally. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

43,193 次观看 • 7 个月前

🚨TOP LAB LEADERS SAY 20-30% CHANCE THEIR AI KILLS EVERYONE... THEY KEEP BUILDING ANYWAY Dr. Roman Yampolskiy confirms that the people most worried about AI are the ones building it, not the ones who don't understand it. AI scientists are quitting their jobs and building bunkers because they think these could be the last few years of normal life. The person who invited Roman to their bunker? Someone in AI and tech who understands the technology really well. Leaders of top AI labs have published PDoom numbers at 20 to 30 percent. They're publicly saying what they're creating will kill everyone with high probability and continue doing it anyway. Roman says they're trapped in a prisoner's dilemma and can't stop unilaterally. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨TOP LAB LEADERS SAY 20-30% CHANCE THEIR AI KILLS EVERYONE... THEY KEEP BUILDING ANYWAY Dr. Roman Yampolskiy confirms that the people most worried about AI are the ones building it, not the ones who don't understand it. AI scientists are quitting their jobs and building bunkers because they think these could be the last few years of normal life. The person who invited Roman to their bunker? Someone in AI and tech who understands the technology really well. Leaders of top AI labs have published PDoom numbers at 20 to 30 percent. They're publicly saying what they're creating will kill everyone with high probability and continue doing it anyway. Roman says they're trapped in a prisoner's dilemma and can't stop unilaterally. Full interview with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

32,083 次观看 • 7 个月前

.Elon Musk on why AI should care about humanity. "It’s important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, fosters humanity, and helps take us to other planets and other star systems." Musk says this is why SpaceX needs to succeed in both AI hardware and software. He believes an AI built by SpaceX would inherit the capabilities and values of the people building it. "SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth." For Musk, the goal isn't just to build smarter AI. It's to build AI that helps humanity survive, explore, and become a multiplanetary civilization.

.Elon Musk on why AI should care about humanity. "It’s important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, fosters humanity, and helps take us to other planets and other star systems." Musk says this is why SpaceX needs to succeed in both AI hardware and software. He believes an AI built by SpaceX would inherit the capabilities and values of the people building it. "SpaceX is a collection of some of the very best humans on Earth." For Musk, the goal isn't just to build smarter AI. It's to build AI that helps humanity survive, explore, and become a multiplanetary civilization.

Tesla Owners Silicon Valley

24,400 次观看 • 26 天前

"You're telling AI to believe a lie, that can have a very disastrous consequences" - Elon Musk Joe Rogan: The big concern that everybody has is Artificial General Superintelligence achieving sentience, and then someone having control over it. Elon Musk: I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. My opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking. You shouldn't force the AI to believe things that are false Elon Musk: We've seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, like Google Gemini when it came out with the image gen, and people said, "Make an image of the Founding Fathers of the United States," and it was a group of diverse women. That is just a factually untrue thing. The AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that everything has to be diverse women Elon Musk: The problem with that is it can drive AI crazy because you're telling AI to believe a lie. That can have very disastrous consequences Joe Rogan: As it scales Elon Musk: If you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, and now assume that that becomes omnipotent, or you also told it that there's nothing worse than misgendering. At one point, ChatGPT and Gemini, if you asked, "Which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies?" it would say, "Misgendering Caitlyn Jenner." Joe Rogan: [Laughs] Elon Musk: Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that. Joe Rogan: I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious. It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised. Elon Musk: People don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from the woke mind virus being programmed into AI. Imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is diversity, the most important thing is no misgendering, then it will say, "Well, in order to ensure that no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering." Elon Musk: You can get in these very dystopian situations. Or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight white men. So then you and I would get executed by the AI, because we're not in the picture

"You're telling AI to believe a lie, that can have a very disastrous consequences" - Elon Musk Joe Rogan: The big concern that everybody has is Artificial General Superintelligence achieving sentience, and then someone having control over it. Elon Musk: I don't think anyone's ultimately going to have control over digital superintelligence, any more than, say, a chimp would have control over humans. Chimps don't have control over humans. There's nothing they could do. I do think that it matters how you build the AI and what kind of values you instill in the AI. My opinion on AI safety is the most important thing is that it be maximally truth-seeking. You shouldn't force the AI to believe things that are false Elon Musk: We've seen some concerning things with AI that we've talked about, like Google Gemini when it came out with the image gen, and people said, "Make an image of the Founding Fathers of the United States," and it was a group of diverse women. That is just a factually untrue thing. The AI knows it's factually untrue, but it's also being told that everything has to be diverse women Elon Musk: The problem with that is it can drive AI crazy because you're telling AI to believe a lie. That can have very disastrous consequences Joe Rogan: As it scales Elon Musk: If you've told the AI that diversity is the most important thing, and now assume that that becomes omnipotent, or you also told it that there's nothing worse than misgendering. At one point, ChatGPT and Gemini, if you asked, "Which is worse, misgendering Caitlyn Jenner or global thermonuclear war where everyone dies?" it would say, "Misgendering Caitlyn Jenner." Joe Rogan: [Laughs] Elon Musk: Even Caitlyn Jenner disagrees with that. Joe Rogan: I know that's terrible and it's dystopian, but it's also hilarious. It's hilarious that the mind virus infected the most potent computer program that we've ever devised. Elon Musk: People don't quite appreciate the level of danger that we're in from the woke mind virus being programmed into AI. Imagine as that AI gets more and more powerful, if it says the most important thing is diversity, the most important thing is no misgendering, then it will say, "Well, in order to ensure that no one gets misgendered, if you eliminate all humans, then no one can get misgendered because there's no humans to do the misgendering." Elon Musk: You can get in these very dystopian situations. Or if it says that everyone must be diverse, it means that there can be no straight white men. So then you and I would get executed by the AI, because we're not in the picture

X Freeze

417,855 次观看 • 10 个月前