🇻🇪🇺🇸🇨🇳 The Bloomberg analysis makes one thing painfully clear: The U.S. didn’t capture Venezuela’s oil, it captured a geopolitical illusion. For years, Washington convinced itself that: • Venezuela was sitting on “300 billion barrels of the world’s most desired reserves” • China depended heavily on Venezuelan crude • Cutting... Maduro off would create a global shock None of that is true. 1. Venezuela’s so-called “massive reserves” are mostly paper barrels. The oil is ultra-heavy, ultra-costly, and requires massive refining capacity. 2. China wasn’t the loser. China’s strategy was structural. For years it: • shifted refining toward lighter Middle Eastern crude • reduced reliance on heavy oil from 38% → 27% • diversified importing channels • built massive floating and onshore storage • upgraded refineries to handle any blend 3. The real winners? OPEC middleweights, who happily fill the gap and stabilize prices. 4. The real losers? U.S. consumers, now tied to ultra-heavy crude with massive processing costs. Meanwhile, Venezuela’s bonds pumped, floating-storage oil soared, and exports quietly redirected to India, Spain, even the U.S. itself. It was a repeat of the Iraq playbook without the gold to show for it. America grabbed the headline. Everyone else grabbed the profit.show more

𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦

57,560 subscribers

Share Download