Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

The bottleneck in coding is now the time it takes a human to review agent-generated code. But existing review UIs don't work well for agents. So we built a new one into Amp.

Beyang

12,435 subscribers

63,082 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

We've built a massive verification bottleneck: • 72% of developers use AI to generate code every day • 96% of them don't fully trust it Writing code is now free. All the work now is verifying that the code does what it's supposed to. According to a new State of Code Survey, almost half of the respondents believe the number one skill that will matter most in the coming years is "reviewing and validating AI-generated code for quality and security". Not prompt engineering or vibe-coding, but checking AI's work.

We've built a massive verification bottleneck: • 72% of developers use AI to generate code every day • 96% of them don't fully trust it Writing code is now free. All the work now is verifying that the code does what it's supposed to. According to a new State of Code Survey, almost half of the respondents believe the number one skill that will matter most in the coming years is "reviewing and validating AI-generated code for quality and security". Not prompt engineering or vibe-coding, but checking AI's work.

Santiago

16,299 views • 7 months ago

Introducing Bottleneck: Code review for hyper engineers - Faster loads. Github is slow and crashes. Bottleneck is desktop native, uses smart caches, never lags. - Built for coding agents. Group PRs by prompt, agent, or contributor. - Superhuman shortcuts. Keybinds for everything Looking for testers! Waitlist or/DM me

Introducing Bottleneck: Code review for hyper engineers - Faster loads. Github is slow and crashes. Bottleneck is desktop native, uses smart caches, never lags. - Built for coding agents. Group PRs by prompt, agent, or contributor. - Superhuman shortcuts. Keybinds for everything Looking for testers! Waitlist or/DM me

Alex Reibman 🖇️

71,146 views • 11 months ago

Today we're launching REVIEW.FAST, speeding up human review of AI generated code 3X. AI changed the world, sped up writing code, but shifted the bottleneck to review. If you can speed up code review, you can ship more. It's as simple as that.

Today we're launching REVIEW.FAST, speeding up human review of AI generated code 3X. AI changed the world, sped up writing code, but shifted the bottleneck to review. If you can speed up code review, you can ship more. It's as simple as that.

Louis Knight-Webb

46,271 views • 8 months ago

more and more work is moving into coding agents, I don't live in my editor anymore but you gotta keep an eye on these little goblins, they write bad code. so we built a diff viewer in opencode! available now

more and more work is moving into coding agents, I don't live in my editor anymore but you gotta keep an eye on these little goblins, they write bad code. so we built a diff viewer in opencode! available now

James Long

183,073 views • 2 months ago

Claude Code tip: create an agent that specialises in code review and security. Then add a new memory entry with a nickname for it so you can call it anytime. My code review and security agent is called Big Tony.

Claude Code tip: create an agent that specialises in code review and security. Then add a new memory entry with a nickname for it so you can call it anytime. My code review and security agent is called Big Tony.

Richie

135,574 views • 7 months ago

Anthropic engineer showed how one person can run 5 AI agents, that code, test, review, and deploy at the same time. In 30 minutes they built the whole thing live in one session. Here's what they cover: > when to use one agent vs a full team > how to split work so agents don't step on each other > the exact framework for deciding what each agent handles that's exactly why, I put together a guide on building agent teams that actually work. full guide in the article below 👇

Anthropic engineer showed how one person can run 5 AI agents, that code, test, review, and deploy at the same time. In 30 minutes they built the whole thing live in one session. Here's what they cover: > when to use one agent vs a full team > how to split work so agents don't step on each other > the exact framework for deciding what each agent handles that's exactly why, I put together a guide on building agent teams that actually work. full guide in the article below 👇

darkzodchi

843,371 views • 2 months ago

Temporal CEO Samar Birwadker says GitHub was designed for humans, but is now at the mercy of agents. "Agents are starting to get more and more long-lived, more asynchronous, and more mission-critical." "For example, if you pick coding agents alone, is something like GitHub was designed for humans collaborate and create [pull requests] right now." "Now a lot of code is being generated by these agents, and they're the ones creating these PRs essentially, and even code review process is being automated by other agents." "So now this entire system backend, which is being built for human consumption, is now at the mercy of these agents kind of using it for their own coordination and collaboration."

Temporal CEO Samar Birwadker says GitHub was designed for humans, but is now at the mercy of agents. "Agents are starting to get more and more long-lived, more asynchronous, and more mission-critical." "For example, if you pick coding agents alone, is something like GitHub was designed for humans collaborate and create [pull requests] right now." "Now a lot of code is being generated by these agents, and they're the ones creating these PRs essentially, and even code review process is being automated by other agents." "So now this entire system backend, which is being built for human consumption, is now at the mercy of these agents kind of using it for their own coordination and collaboration."

MTS

26,902 views • 3 months ago

Agents can one shot mobile apps, but testing is still the bottleneck. So we built a CLI that gives Claude Code the one thing it was missing - eyes and hands The best part? t's fully vision-based: - No scripts, no selectors, no element IDs - It interacts with the app exactly like a human would Claude now writes code → tests it on the app → sees what broke → fixes it Spawn a cloud agent, go to sleep, and wake up knowing it actually worked.

Agents can one shot mobile apps, but testing is still the bottleneck. So we built a CLI that gives Claude Code the one thing it was missing - eyes and hands The best part? t's fully vision-based: - No scripts, no selectors, no element IDs - It interacts with the app exactly like a human would Claude now writes code → tests it on the app → sees what broke → fixes it Spawn a cloud agent, go to sleep, and wake up knowing it actually worked.

Landseer Enga

86,958 views • 5 months ago

LeetCode is dead. Developers don't write code line-by-line anymore. They orchestrate AI agents working in parallel, review AI-generated code, and make architectural decisions. That's the job now. But most interview processes haven't caught up. They still test algorithm memorization instead of AI fluency, code review, and judgment. We're building assessments for next-gen hiring that mirror how developers actually work. Here's how we think about it:

LeetCode is dead. Developers don't write code line-by-line anymore. They orchestrate AI agents working in parallel, review AI-generated code, and make architectural decisions. That's the job now. But most interview processes haven't caught up. They still test algorithm memorization instead of AI fluency, code review, and judgment. We're building assessments for next-gen hiring that mirror how developers actually work. Here's how we think about it:

HackerRank

344,122 views • 4 months ago

I’ve been working on dunk. It’s a terminal diff reviewer where you mark issues inline, then let a coding agent fix them. It started as a fork of hunk, but I stripped it down to the loop I need: review → my comments → agent fixes I’m spending time reviewing code and leaving comments for agents rather than writing code myself. But in most tools, that feedback loop still feels broken. dunk is a simple way to make it work across Claude Code, Codex, Pi, etc.

I’ve been working on dunk. It’s a terminal diff reviewer where you mark issues inline, then let a coding agent fix them. It started as a fork of hunk, but I stripped it down to the loop I need: review → my comments → agent fixes I’m spending time reviewing code and leaving comments for agents rather than writing code myself. But in most tools, that feedback loop still feels broken. dunk is a simple way to make it work across Claude Code, Codex, Pi, etc.

Amir Salihefendić

13,156 views • 3 months ago

I paid the $500 for Devin, the mega hyped AI coding agent, so you don't have to here's an in depth review of how it compares to Cursor:

I paid the $500 for Devin, the mega hyped AI coding agent, so you don't have to here's an in depth review of how it compares to Cursor:

Steve (Builder.io)

368,136 views • 1 year ago

Code review, but faster. Introducing Diffs. A new way to review PRs, directly inside Linear. • Realtime updates • Guided reviews with Al (beta) • Focused notifications • Iterate with coding agents • Threaded comments

Code review, but faster. Introducing Diffs. A new way to review PRs, directly inside Linear. • Realtime updates • Guided reviews with Al (beta) • Focused notifications • Iterate with coding agents • Threaded comments

Linear

8,157,767 views • 2 months ago

Cursor shipped a /thermo-nuclear-code-review for the TOUGHEST AI code review possible. But is it any good? Let's dive in:

Cursor shipped a /thermo-nuclear-code-review for the TOUGHEST AI code review possible. But is it any good? Let's dive in:

Matt Pocock

135,453 views • 2 months ago

Turn any website into an AI-readable design system. Here's how: Google recently introduced the DESIGN.md specification: a file that helps AI agents understand a product’s design system. So we built a free tool for designers. Paste any website URL and Masumi’s DESIGN.md Generator extracts the brand’s colors, typography, components, spacing, and visual rules into an editable DESIGN.md file. Your designer can review it, tweak it, and hand it to Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, or any AI coding agent so the generated UI stays on-brand. Links below

albina

26,087 views • 3 months ago

New: Coding sessions on mobile Keep work moving from the Linear mobile app. Review code changes, comment on specific lines, and send feedback directly to the agent.

New: Coding sessions on mobile Keep work moving from the Linear mobile app. Review code changes, comment on specific lines, and send feedback directly to the agent.

Linear

61,723 views • 19 days ago

We built Claude Code into a browser & whiteboard! It's called Decode Decode It’s the fastest & best way to give UX feedback to Claude Code while coding locally & enables it to review & test changes itself See thread👇to learn how whiteboards makes it an even better browser

We built Claude Code into a browser & whiteboard! It's called Decode Decode It’s the fastest & best way to give UX feedback to Claude Code while coding locally & enables it to review & test changes itself See thread👇to learn how whiteboards makes it an even better browser

Francois Laberge

162,633 views • 10 months ago

Claude Code is the best coding agent on the market, but there is a catch: you have to keep your terminal open. This is why we built Terragon: use Claude Code as a background agent.

Claude Code is the best coding agent on the market, but there is a catch: you have to keep your terminal open. This is why we built Terragon: use Claude Code as a background agent.

Sawyer Hood

151,045 views • 1 year ago

We're launching Niteshift – the full-stack cloud for coding agents Verification is the new bottleneck. Software teams can now define their dev environment and verification tools once. Then run any frontier agent in the cloud: Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode

We're launching Niteshift – the full-stack cloud for coding agents Verification is the new bottleneck. Software teams can now define their dev environment and verification tools once. Then run any frontier agent in the cloud: Claude Code, Codex, or OpenCode

Sajid Mehmood

91,334 views • 2 months ago

I built a multimodal AI Coding Agent team with multi-agents. It has 3 AI agents working together as a team to generate and execute the code: 1. Coding Agent using o-3 mini 2. Vision Agent using Gemini 3. Code Execution Agent using o-3 mini and E2B 100% Opensource Code.

I built a multimodal AI Coding Agent team with multi-agents. It has 3 AI agents working together as a team to generate and execute the code: 1. Coding Agent using o-3 mini 2. Vision Agent using Gemini 3. Code Execution Agent using o-3 mini and E2B 100% Opensource Code.

Shubham Saboo

42,281 views • 1 year ago

We've been tracking AI code review tools across OSS, and a new category is emerging. We're calling it "Deep Review": → Standard AI review: PR-level, fast, human in the loop → Deep Review: repo-wide context, runs autonomously in the background 🧵👇

We've been tracking AI code review tools across OSS, and a new category is emerging. We're calling it "Deep Review": → Standard AI review: PR-level, fast, human in the loop → Deep Review: repo-wide context, runs autonomously in the background 🧵👇

Martian

40,887 views • 4 months ago